Develop Reference

Trouble with Addition Assignment in Array from Firebase

I have a scenario where i need to query multiple collections at once and retrieve the values based on the collection name. I use Promise.all to do so and it works accordingly like so
var dbPromises = [];
dbPromises.push(
admin.firestore().collection("collection1").where("user_id", "==", uid).get(),
admin.firestore().collection("collection2").where("user_id", "==", uid).get(),
admin.firestore().collection("collection3").where("user_id", "==", uid).get(),
);
const promiseConst = await Promise.all(dbPromises);
promiseConst.forEach((qs) => {
if (qs.size > 0) {
if (qs.query._queryOptions.collectionId == "collection1") {
qs.docs.map((doc) => {
valuesArr1.push(doc.data().arr);
});
} else if (qs.query._queryOptions.collectionId == "Collection2") {
qs.docs.map((doc) => {
valuesArr2.push(doc.data());
});
} else if (qs.query._queryOptions.collectionId == "collection3") {
qs.docs.map((doc) => {
valuesArr3.push(doc.data());
});
}
} else {
return
}
});
for (var i=0; i < valuesArr1.length; i++) {
if (valuesArr1[i].desiredData) {
console.log('datas from for loop on datas array', valuesArr1[i].desiredData)
globalVariable += `<img src="${valuesArr1[i].desiredData}">`;
}
}
Once I do this I map the query snapshot I get and am able to retrieve the values up to this point like so
From the first collection I retrieve an array from a firestore document and then the following collections i just retrieve all documents from the collections. This all 'works' in that when I console.log into the functions console the data shows up exactly as expected. It's only when I want to iterate over the data and assign the results to a global variable to use elsewhere that strange behavior occurs.
The console.log shows the desired data in the functions console with no issues, but the output when I interpolate that data into the html and send it off in nodemailer I get the following result
undefined is always the first in the response when i use the += addition assignment operator, but if i just use the = assignment operator there's no undefined but I obviously don't get all the data I'm expecting.
There are no undefined values or documents in the collections that I'm retrieving, I've checked thoroughly and even deleted documents to make sure of it. After days of researching I've come to the conclusion it has to do with the asynchronous nature of the promise I'm working with and the data not being immediately ready when I iterate it.
Can someone help me understand what I'm doing wrong and how to fix it in node?

I figured out a solution to my problem and would like to share it in hopes it saves a future viewer some time.
Before, I was storing the results of the array from Firebase inside a global variable. To save some head scratching I'll post the code again below.
var globalVariableArray = []
var globalVariable
var dbPromises = [];
dbPromises.push(
admin.firestore().collection("DataCollection").where("user_id", "==", uid).get()
);
const promiseConst = await Promise.all(dbPromises);
promiseConst.forEach((qs) => {
if (qs.size > 0) {
if (qs.query._queryOptions.collectionId == "DataCollection") {
Promise.all(
qs.docs.map(doc => {
globalVariableArray = doc.data().arrayWithDesiredData;
})
);
}
else {
return
}
});
globalVariableArray.map(gv => {
globalVariable += `<p>gv.desiredData</p>` // <--- Right here is where the problem area was
})
var mailOptions = {
from: foo#blurdybloop.com,
to: 'bar#blurdybloop.com
subject: 'Almost but not quite',
html: `${globalVariable}`
};
The above code give the expected output, but the output would always have undefined first before the data showed. This happened no matter how the array from Firebase was iterated over.
After strengthening my Google-Fu, I worked out the following solution
var globalVariableArray = []
var globalVariable
var dbPromises = [];
dbPromises.push(
admin.firestore().collection("DataCollection").where("user_id", "==", uid).get()
);
const promiseConst = await Promise.all(dbPromises);
promiseConst.forEach((qs) => {
if (qs.size > 0) {
if (qs.query._queryOptions.collectionId == "DataCollection") {
Promise.all(
qs.docs.map(doc => {
globalVariableArray = doc.data().arrayWithDesiredData;
})
);
}
else {
return
}
});
var mailOptions = {
from: foo#blurdybloop.com,
to: 'bar#blurdybloop.com
subject: 'It works!!',
html: `${globalVariableArray.map(dataIWantedAllAlong => <p>dataIWantedAllAlong.desiredData</p> )}` <--- Here I simply loop through the array inside the interpolation blocks and voila! no more undefined showing up in the results
};
I perform the loop inside the brackets where I interpolate the dynamic data and am no longer getting that pesky undefined showing up in my emails.
Safe travels and happy coding to you all!

Wait for all Firebase data query requests before executing code

I am trying to fetch data from different collections in my cloud Firestore database in advance before I process them and apply them to batch, I created two async functions, one to capture the data and another to execute certain code only after all data is collected, I didn't want the code executing and creating errors before the data is fetched when i try to access the matchesObject after the async function to collect data is finished, it keeps saying "it cannot access a property matchStatus of undefined", i thought took care of that with async and await? could anyone shed some light as to why it is undefined one moment
axios.request(options).then(function(response) {
console.log('Total matches count :' + response.data.matches.length);
const data = response.data;
var matchesSnapshot;
var marketsSnapshot;
var tradesSnapshot;
var betsSnapshot;
matchesObject = {};
marketsObject = {};
tradesObject = {};
betsObject = {};
start();
async function checkDatabase() {
matchesSnapshot = await db.collection('matches').get();
matchesSnapshot.forEach(doc => {
matchesObject[doc.id] = doc.data();
console.log('matches object: ' + doc.id.toString())
});
marketsSnapshot = await db.collection('markets').get();
marketsSnapshot.forEach(doc2 => {
marketsObject[doc2.id] = doc2.data();
console.log('markets object: ' + doc2.id.toString())
});
tradesSnapshot = await db.collection('trades').get();
tradesSnapshot.forEach(doc3 => {
tradesObject[doc3.id] = doc3.data();
console.log('trades object: ' + doc3.id.toString())
});
betsSnapshot = await db.collection('bets').get();
betsSnapshot.forEach(doc4 => {
betsObject[doc4.id] = doc4.data();
console.log('bets object: ' + doc4.id.toString())
});
}
async function start() {
await checkDatabase();
// this is the part which is undefined, it keeps saying it cant access property matchStatus of undefined
console.log('here is matches object ' + matchesObject['302283']['matchStatus']);
if (Object.keys(matchesObject).length != 0) {
for (let bets of Object.keys(betsObject)) {
if (matchesObject[betsObject[bets]['tradeMatchId']]['matchStatus'] == 'IN_PLAY' && betsObject[bets]['matched'] == false) {
var sfRef = db.collection('users').doc(betsObject[bets]['user']);
batch11.set(sfRef, {
accountBalance: admin.firestore.FieldValue + parseFloat(betsObject[bets]['stake']),
}, {
merge: true
});
var sfRef = db.collection('bets').doc(bets);
batch12.set(sfRef, {
tradeCancelled: true,
}, {
merge: true
});
}
}
}
});

There are too many smaller issues in the current code to try to debug them one-by-one, so this refactor introduces various tests against your data. It currently won't make any changes to your database and is meant to be a replacement for your start() function.
One of the main differences against your current code is that it doesn't unnecessarily download 4 collections worth of documents (two of them aren't even used in the code you've included).
Steps
First, it will get all the bet documents that have matched == false. From these documents, it will check if they have any syntax errors and report them to the console. For each valid bet document, the ID of it's linked match document will be grabbed so we can then fetch all the match documents we actually need. Then we queue up the changes to the user's balance and the bet's document. Finally we report about any changes to be done and commit them (once you uncomment the line).
Code
Note: fetchDocumentById() is defined in this gist. Its a helper function to allow someCollectionRef.where(FieldPath.documentId(), 'in', arrayOfIds) to take more than 10 IDs at once.
async function applyBalanceChanges() {
const betsCollectionRef = db.collection('bets');
const matchesCollectionRef = db.collection('matches');
const usersCollectionRef = db.collection('users');
const betDataMap = {}; // Record<string, BetData>
await betsCollectionRef
.where('matched', '==', false)
.get()
.then((betsSnapshot) => {
betsSnapshot.forEach(betDoc => {
betDataMap[betDoc.id] = betDoc.data();
});
});
const matchDataMap = {}; // Record<string, MatchData | undefined>
// betIdList contains all IDs that will be processed
const betIdList = Object.keys(betDataMap).filter(betId => {
const betData = betDataMap[betId];
if (!betData) {
console.log(`WARN: Skipped Bet #${betId} because it was falsy (actual value: ${betData})`);
return false;
}
const matchId = betData.tradeMatchId;
if (!matchId) {
console.log(`WARN: Skipped Bet #${betId} because it had a falsy match ID (actual value: ${matchId})`);
return false;
}
if (!betData.user) {
console.log(`WARN: Skipped Bet #${betId} because it had a falsy user ID (actual value: ${userId})`);
return false;
}
const stakeAsNumber = Number(betData.stake); // not using parseFloat as it's too lax
if (isNaN(stakeAsNumber)) {
console.log(`WARN: Skipped Bet #${betId} because it had an invalid stake value (original NaN value: ${betData.stake})`);
return false;
}
matchDataMap[matchId] = undefined; // using undefined because its the result of `doc.data()` when the document doesn't exist
return true;
});
await fetchDocumentsById(
matchesCollectionRef,
Object.keys(matchIdMap),
(matchDoc) => matchDataMap[matchDoc.id] = matchDoc.data()
);
const batch = db.batch();
const queuedUpdates = 0;
betIdList.forEach(betId => {
const betData = betDataMap[betId];
const matchData = matchDataMap[betData.tradeMatchId];
if (matchData === undefined) {
console.log(`WARN: Skipped /bets/${betId}, because it's linked match doesn't exist!`);
continue;
}
if (matchData.matchStatus !== 'IN_PLAY') {
console.log(`INFO: Skipped /bets/${betId}, because it's linked match status is not "IN_PLAY" (actual value: ${matchData.matchStatus})`);
continue;
}
const betRef = betsCollectionRef.doc(betId);
const betUserRef = usersCollectionRef.doc(betData.user);
batch.update(betUserRef, { accountBalance: admin.firestore.FieldValue.increment(Number(betData.stake)) });
batch.update(betRef, { tradeCancelled: true });
queuedUpdates += 2; // for logging
});
console.log(`INFO: Batch currently has ${queuedUpdates} queued`);
// only uncomment when you are ready to make changes
// batch.commit();
}
Usage:
axios.request(options)
.then(function(response) {
const data = response.data;
console.log('INFO: Total matches count from API:' + data.matches.length);
return applyBalanceChanges();
}

How to break the for loop using state

I have code as below.
I need to break the loop when first match is found.
const [isCodeValid, setIsCodeValid] = useState(false);
for (let i = 0; i < properyIds.length; i++) {
if (isCodeValid) {
break; // this breaks it but had to click twice so state would update
}
if (!isCodeValid) {
firestore().collection(`properties`)
.doc(`${properyIds[i]}`)
.collection('companies').get()
.then(companies => {
companies.forEach(company => {
if (_.trim(company.data().registrationCode) === _.trim(registrationCode.toUpperCase())) {
console.log("should break here")
// updating state like this wont take effect right away
// it shows true on second time click. so user need to click twice right now.
setIsCodeValid(true);
}
});
})
}
}
state won't update right away so if (!isCodeValid) only works on second click.
Once I find match I need to update state or variable so I can break the for loop.
I tried to use a variable but its value also not changing in final if condition, I wonder what is the reason? can anyone please explain ?

You should try and rewrite your code such that you will always call setIsCodeValid(value) once. In your case it could be called multiple times and it might not get called at all
const [isCodeValid, setIsCodeValid] = useState(false);
function checkForValidCode() {
// map to an array of promises for companies[]
const companiesPromises = properyIds.map(propertyId =>
firestore()
.collection(`properties`)
.doc(propertyId)
.collection('companies').get())
Promise.all(companiesPromises)
// flatten the 2d array to single array, re-create to JS array because of firestores internal types?
.then(companiesArray => [...companiesArray].flatMap(v => v))
// go through all companies to find a match
.then(companies =>
companies.find(
company => _.trim(company.data().registrationCode) === _.trim(registrationCode.toUpperCase())
))
.then(foundCompany => {
// code is valid if we found a matching company
setIsCodeValue(foundCompany !== undefined)
})
}

Try something like this:
import { useState } from 'react';
function YourComponent({ properyIds }) {
const [isCodeValid, setIsCodeValid] = useState(false);
async function handleSignupClick() {
if (isCodeValid) {
return;
}
for (let i = 0; i < properyIds.length; i++) {
const companies = await firestore()
.collection(`properties`)
.doc(`${properyIds[i]}`)
.collection('companies')
.get();
for (const company of companies.docs) {
if (_.trim(company.data().registrationCode) === _.trim(registrationCode.toUpperCase())) {
setIsCodeValid(true);
return;
}
}
}
}
return (<button onClick={handleSignupClick}>Sign Up</button>);
}
If you await these checks, that will allow you to sequentially loop and break out with a simple return, something you can't do inside of a callback. Note that if this is doing database queries, you should probably show waiting feedback while this is taking place so the user knows that clicking did something.
Update:
You may want to do all these checks in parallel if feasible so the user doesn't have to wait. Depends on your situation. Here's how you'd do that.
async function handleSignupClick() {
if (isCodeValid) {
return;
}
const allCompanies = await Promise.all(
properyIds.map(id => firestore()
.collection(`properties`)
.doc(`${properyIds[i]}`)
.collection('companies')
.get()
)
);
setIsCodeValid(
allCompanies.some(companiesSnapshot =>
companiesSnapshot.docs.some(company =>
_.trim(company.data().registrationCode) === _.trim(registrationCode.toUpperCase())
)
)
);
}

Can you not break it after setIsCodeValid(true);?

Use some:
companies.some(company => {
return _.trim(company.data().registrationCode) === _.trim(registrationCode.toUpperCase());
});
If some and forEach are not available then companies is not an array but an array-like object. To iterate through those, we can use for of loop:
for (const company of companies){
if (_.trim(company.data().registrationCode) === _.trim(registrationCode.toUpperCase())) {
// do something
break;
}
}

I tired below and it worked for me to break the loop.
I declared and tried to change this variable let codeValid and it was just not updating its value when match found. (not sure why)
But all of a sudden I tried and it just works.
I didnt change any actual code except for variable.
let codeValid = false;
let userInformation = []
for (let i = 0; i < properties.length; i++) {
console.log("called")
const companies = await firestore().collection(`properties`)
.doc(`${properties[i].id}`)
.collection('companies').get()
.then(companies => {
companies.forEach(company => {
if (_.trim(company.data().registrationCode) === _.trim(registrationCode.toUpperCase())) {
// a += 1;
codeValid = true;
userInformation.registrationCode = registrationCode.toUpperCase();
userInformation.companyName = company.data().companyName;
userInformation.propertyName = properties[i].propertyName;
}
});
})
if (codeValid) {
break;
}
}

Calling Json Objects With Parameters Passed to Function

I've run into an interesting dilemma- I want to write a function which, given a couple parameters, will return an object/parameter in a JSON response based on the value of another.
Snippet 1 shows a way that I could do it with simple case checking:
function callf() {
return f("name", "project_id", "sampleName");
}
function f(Where, Return, Is) {
var options = {
"option1": "asdf",
"option2": "asdf"
}
var url = "..."
var response = UrlFetchApp.fetch(url, options);
var jsonResponse = JSON.parse(response.getContentText());
for (i in jsonResponse) {
if (Where == "object1") {
//Instead of dynamically calling the object, use case testing to call the desired object.
if (jsonResponse[i].object1 == Is) {
if (Return = "returnValue1") {
return jsonResponse[i].returnValue1;
} else if (Return = "returnValue2") {
return jsonResponse[i].returnValue2;
}
}
} else if (Where == "object2") {
if (jsonResponse[i].object2 == Is) {
if (Return = "returnValue1") {
return jsonResponse[i].returnValue1;
} else if (Return = "returnValue2") {
return jsonResponse[i].returnValue2;
}
}
}
}
However, with doing it the way above, I have to account for every possible object that the json response contains, that would be a pain. I want to find an alternative where I can simply pass the a string representing the object I want to return from a function like the snippet below:
function callf(){
return f("name","project_id","sampleName");
}
function f(Where,Return,Is){
var options = {
"option1":"asdf",
"option2":"asdf"
}
var url = "..."
var response = UrlFetchApp.fetch(url,options);
var jsonResponse = JSON.parse(response.getContentText());
for(i in jsonResponse){
if(jsonResponse[i].(Where)==Is){
return jsonResponse[i].(Return);
}
}
}
How might I accomplish this?

Just like you're accessing json with i variable as key using square brackets,
for(var i in jsonResponse){
if(jsonResponse[i][Where]==Is){
return jsonResponse[i][Return];
}
}

for loop in recursive function

I am facing critical issue in recursive function. This is my recursive function:
iterateJson(data, jsonData, returnedSelf) {
var obj = {
"name": data.groupName,
"size": 4350,
"type": data.groupType
};
if (data.parentGroupName == jsonData.name) {
jsonData.children.push(obj);
} else {
if (jsonData.children) {
for (var i = 0; i < jsonData.children.length; i++) {
if (data.parentGroupName == jsonData.children[i].name) {
jsonData.children[i].children.push(obj);
elementFound = true;
break;
}
}
if (elementFound) {
return jsonData;
} else {
if (jsonData.children) {
for (i = 0; i < jsonData.children.length; i++) {
if (elementFound) {
return jsonData;
} else {
jsonData = jsonData.children[i];
jsonData = returnedSelf.iterateJson(data, jsonData, returnedSelf);
}
}
}
}
}
}
return jsonData;
},
Now the problem is that, in the second for loop, (jsonData.children.length)
my jsonData is getting changed. how to retain the parent jsonData .
Hope my question is clear.
Editing to make it more precise.
suppose initially jsondata has 5 elements and i enter the loop took first children as new jsonData and call this function again. so when the condition will get fulfilled, it should return to for loop and jsonData should have that initial element of 5 data. rather than that, it is having new json data which is first child element of original jsonData.
My ask is how to retain that parent jsonData with 5 element.

As I Do not know about input data but
jsonData = jsonData.children[i];
jsonData = returnedSelf.iterateJson(data, jsonData, returnedSelf);
This are only lines who can override jsonData.