Develop Reference

Get list of open connections from JS SignalR client?

I have a site I'm developing, and I open quite a few connections to my SignalR hub. Sometimes, a call to HubConnection.start hangs, and I suspect it's because the client's at some kind of open connection limit. Is there a way I can get a list of all open SignalR connections from the JS client side?

When working with websockets should I open a new websocket connection for every different task? Or should I do everything within one connection?

I work with socket.io in my react app, and I have a back-end expressJS server. My question is, should I open a new websocket connection for every functionality separately, or should I use just one connection for multiple things? Like for example I have a chat component where users can send chat messages between one another, but I also want to make a web socket for notifications listener and online status. I wonder wether not to open new connections for that and keep things separate or just to have one connection (this would hopefully save server recourses) and make different calls to that connection?

Socket.IO has the concept of namespaces which you can use to differentiate different aspects of your application.
Internally, it will actually share a WebSocket (assuming it isn't using HTTP long-polling) for all namespaces.
There's otherwise nothing wrong with a new WebSocket, besides having your server to perform more work, since there's another socket to handle and keep track of.

Socket.io and Node.Js multiple servers

I'm new to Web Sockets in general, but get the main concept.
I am trying to build a simple multiplayer game and would like to have a server selection where I can run sockets on multiple IPs and it will connect the client through that, to mitigate connections in order to improve performance, this is hypothetical in the case of there being thousands of players at once, but would like some insight into how this would work and if there are any resources I can use to integrate this before hand, in order to prevent extra work at a later date. Is this at all possible, as I understand it Node.Js runs on a server and uses the Socket.io dependencies to create sockets within that, so I can't think of a possible solution to route it through another server unless I had multiple sites running it separately.

The first question I have is this:
Are you hosting on AWS or in a local datacenter?
The reason I ask is because SOCKET.io requires sticky sessions to work properly across multiple servers. Due to the fact that SOCKET.io will attempt to upgrade each connection, and because that upgrade request must reach the original server that authorized the session, you'll need to route websocket (TCP) connections back to that original server via sticky sessions. Unfortunately AWS makes this extremely tricky and will require you to learn how to:
A) Modify elastic load balancer policies to forward protocol information
B) Split apart TCP connections from standard web requests using something like HA PROXY or NGINX. This is necessary in order to handle web socket UPGRADE requests properly, as you will be setting TCP to sticky and web requests to round-robin.
C) Attach your socket.io configuration to a common storage source, like Redis (elasticache).
Once you've figured out what's needed for AWS (or if you've got full control over request routing at your local datacenter), you'll want to architect your SOCKET application to use multicast rooms rather than direct socket messaging.
Example:
To send a message to users in game #4444, emit a message to room 'games:4444', rather than direct to the user's socket.
If your socket instance is configured using REDIS, REDIS will automatically take care of maintaining lists of people who are connected to your 'games:4444' channel. Otherwise you'll need to maintain the list yourself using a database or other shared mechanism.
Other than that, there are plenty of resources online that can help you figure out each step along the way. I'd start with understanding something like HA PROXY and how it can help split apart your SOCKETS from your web requests.

Is this WebSockets approach correct?

I want to create this routine:
I access the /receiver (Receiver)
Receiver is listening for 'hello' event
I access the /emitter (Emitter) from another tab
Emitter fires the 'hello' event
Receiver says alert("Hello world") when 'hello' event is fired
Is it possible using WebSockets? I want to make the API server with Python, and the client with JavaScript.

webSockets connect client and server. The do not directly connect two web pages in two different tabs.
It is possible that two web pages in two different tabs could each connect to the server and the server could then route messages sent from one web page to the other web page. That's how a typical chat program works (which is a classic demo app for webSockets).
Yes, this is possible to build with a server in Python and client in Javascript web page.
You can certainly find many libraries written for webSockets in Python with your own search. Browser Javascript already has webSocket support built in. Many people choose to use socket.io which is a higher-level library built on top of webSocket and there are implementations for socket.io in many languages (including Javascript for the browser and Python for the server).

WebSocket is used when you need a persistent, web-friendly connection with or without a browser. If you just need to merely communicate among tabs in the same browser instance, you can use localStorage (which fires an StorageEvent event) even if you are offline.
If you potentially need the emitter to be accessed by another browser out on the web, or if the emitter was not a browser web-app (e.g., an IoT use case), then you would need WebSocket. Then one good solution would be a simple publish/subscribe mechanism using WebSocket. Here's a good Angular library that a colleague wrote that might help you:
https://github.com/kaazing/tutorials
Full disclosure: I work for Kaazing

For a push notification, is a websocket mandatory?

I have PHP on the server side, and HTML and javascript on the client side.
I am making an app where a stakeholder types a message that is broadcasted to multiple recievers of a group in real time.
I did some research on google and I understand I need to use WebSockets or Comet for real time push notifications. Is WebSocket or Comet mandatory for sending mass notifications to users?
Is my understanding correct? Any references to start with?

If the client is a browser, then the ONLY two ways a standard browser can connect to a server is via an Ajax (e.g. http) request or a webSocket connection. So, if you want a client to get notified of something from the outside world it has to use one of those two mechanisms.
HTTP requests are transitory. The client makes a request of a server, the server responds. HTTP requests are perfect for the client requesting information from the server. They are not very good at the server sending information to the client because normally the client is not connected. There are hacks and work-arounds where the client "polls" the server on some interval and maybe even the server uses longer running requests to try to simulate a "push" type system, but they are sub-optimal hacks at best.
webSockets are continuous connections. The client connects and the connection remains in place for as long as both sides want. This allows either side the ability to send a message to the other side whenever they want. That means the server can "push" data to the client whenever it wants. webSockets are efficient for push connections and are recommended (this is one of the main things they were designed for).
Comet is a library that was originally built for using HTTP to try to "hack" or "simulate" push before webSockets were invented and then before they were widely supported. I can think of no reason why one would want to use Comet instead of a webSocket unless you had such an old browser that webSocket was not supported.
So, if you are trying to do "realtime server push" to a browser, then you must have a continuously connected socket from the client which means webSocket (or something built on top of webSocket like socket.io).
For phone apps where you have access to the phone SDK, you can use the "push" system built into the OS to push some messages from server to client. This isn't quite the same as the two way webSocket channel, but since you asked about "push notifications", the OS push services available in both Android and IOS could also be an option for pushing notifications from server to client. Here's info on iOS notifications and Google Cloud Messaging
As of 2016, one can also use Server-sent events in all modern browsers except Microsoft browsers (not supported yet in Edge or IE) to push data from server to client. Here's a browser compatibility table. Server-sent events use a long lasting HTTP connection, a special MIME type and a supporting client in order to be able to send events from server to client at any time. Unlike webSockets, server-sent events are one way only (from server to client). A client would then use a traditional Ajax call in order to be able to send data to a server (whereas with a webSocket data can be sent either way over the same webSocket connection).
Here's a good description of how server-sent events work: How do server-sent events actually work?

Is your client application a SPA? (Single Page application)?
It's very important because if not, you have to consider that everytime a client change page, connection with websocket server will be lost.
In this case you have to manage a queue because if stakeholder send a multicast request when one client is disconnected, client won't receive nothing.
Polling won't solve this situation too and it's an orrible solution because mobile clients (for example) with typical internet plan, will consume megabytes for unuseful "ping" traffic.
A real example of polling is a child in a car asking his dad every minute if they are arrived to a destination!
So, Is there a solution without using spa?
Yes, using a "shared storage" between stakeholder and clients, and using websocket only for "wake up" online clients saying: Hey there is something new, go to check!
Everytime a client open a page it will receive from backend also not-read notifications, taken from the storage.
When a stakeholder want to notify something, it will just store the notification message in the shared storage and send a "pulse" to notification server.
Notification server will forward the "pulse" to online clients (just in case someone is stuck reading a page).
If a "pulse" is lost because a client is changing page there is no problem because the client will bring notifications from the storage.
Every page will contain this logic:
Retrive number or unread notifications (server side)
Connect to the notification server after 5 seconds (javascript side).
Hope it helps.

I would suggest that using webSockets is a more efficient way compared to other options, why is this? Well when a client receives a notification that there's a change in the server there is no need to create an AJAX call to the server to get that change, it can be sent to the client with the same webSocket connection more easily than AJAX. This means efficient code and a faster running App!