Develop Reference

using splice inside 2D Array in Javascript

I've created this 2D array, and I'm trying to delete the rows that are having 5 "ones" or more,
I tried it with splice (a.splice(j,1)) but it doesn't work . I think because when using this method it changes the whole quantity of rows and that's affects the for loops.
Is it because I don't use splice correctly or should I use different method ?
Thanks !
a = Array(7).fill(0).map(x => Array(10).fill(0))
for (let i = 0; i < 5; i++) {
a[1][i + 2] = 1;
a[4][i + 2] = 1;
a[5][i + 2] = 1;
}
console.log(a);
let count = 0;
for (let j = 0; j < 7; j++) {
for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
if (a[j][i] == 1) {
count = count + 1;
}
}
if (count > 4) {
console.log("Line" + j);
// a.splice(j,1);
}
count = 0;
// a.splice(j,1);
}

Your splice is correct but you move forward through the array (j is incremented). To do this type of operation you need to move backward through the array (j is decremented) - this way the changing array indices don't intefere with your loop.
See the example below:
a = Array(7).fill(0).map(x => Array(10).fill(0))
for (let i=0; i<5; i++) {
a[1][i+2] = 1;
a[4][i+2] = 1;
a[5][i+2] = 1;
}
console.log("Original array");
console.log(a);
for (let j = a.length - 1; j > 0; j--) {
var count;
for (let i = 0; i < a[j].length; i++) {
if (a[j][i] === 1) {
count += 1
}
}
if (count > 4) {
a.splice(j, 1);
}
count = 0;
}
console.log("Filtered array");
console.log(a);

Correct merge sort

So... If I input:
4 1 5 3
INSTEAD OF 1,3,4,5
I GET [ 4, 1, 5, 3 ]
Following is the code for merge sort but for the last comparison the program doesn't fetch updated (1,4) (3,5) value rather (4,1) (5,3) thus giving the wrong result.
var a = [4, 1, 5, 3];
q(a);
function q(a) {
var start = 0;
var n = a.length;
var length = parseInt(n / 2);
if (n < 2) {
return n;
}
var l = [], r = [];
for (i = 0; i < length; i++) {
l[i] = a[i]; //left array
}
for (i = 0, j = length; j < n; i++ , j++) {
r[i] = a[j]; //right array
}
q(l); //merge sort left array
q(r); //merge sort right array
comp(l, r);
}
function comp(l, r) {
var k = [], m = 0, i = 0, j = 0;
while (i < ((l.length)) && j < ((r.length))) {
if (l[i] < r[j]) {
k[m] = l[i];
i++;
m++
}
else {
k[m] = r[j];
j++;
m++
}
}
while (i != (l.length)) {
k[m] = l[i];
m++;
i++;
}
while (j != (r.length)) {
k[m] = r[j];
m++;
j++;
}
console.log(k); //for final output it is [ 4, 1, 5, 3 ] instead of [1,3,4,5]
}

You have a couple small problems. The main one is that you are returning the wrong thing from your edge condition:
if (n < 2) {
return n; // n is just a length; doesn't make sense to return it.
}
n is the length, you really want to return the small array here:
if (n < 2) {
return a; // return the array instead
}
Also, you need to pass the result of the recursive call to your comp function. Right now you're just returning the original lists with:
comp(l, r)
Something like this would work better:
let l_sort = q(l); //merge sort left array
let r_sort = q(r); //merge sort right array
return comp(l_sort, r_sort); // merge the arrays when recursion unwinds.
And you need to return things for recursion to work.
Put all together:
function q(a) {
var start = 0;
var n = a.length;
var length = parseInt(n / 2);
if (n < 2) {
return a;
}
var l = [],
r = [];
for (i = 0; i < length; i++) {
l[i] = a[i]; //left array
}
for (i = 0, j = length; j < n; i++, j++) {
r[i] = a[j]; //right array
}
let l_sort = q(l); //merge sort left array
let r_sort = q(r); //merge sort right array
return comp(l_sort, r_sort);
}
function comp(l, r) {
var k = [],
m = 0,
i = 0,
j = 0;
while (i < ((l.length)) && j < ((r.length))) {
if (l[i] < r[j]) {
k[m] = l[i];
i++;
m++
} else {
k[m] = r[j];
j++;
m++
}
}
while (i != (l.length)) {
k[m] = l[i];
m++;
i++;
}
while (j != (r.length)) {
k[m] = r[j];
m++;
j++;
}
return k
}
console.log(q([4, 1, 5, 3]).join(','));
console.log(q([5, 4, 3, 2, 1]).join(','));
console.log(q([2, 3]).join(','));
console.log(q([3, 2]).join(','));
console.log(q([1]).join(','));

How many times needed to Sort a number in an Array Javascript

I want to count how many times needed for an array to be sorted
var array = [4,2,3,1]
var yourCounter = 0;
for (var i = 0; i < array.length; i++) {
for (var j = 1; j < array.length-j; j++)
if (array[j - 1] > array[j]) {
yourCounter++;
} }
it will return 4 , it should be 5
but if I input array [1,2,3] will correctly return 0 , and if I input array [3,2,1] it will correctly return 3

You could take the given code and swap the values while counting.
for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
for (int j = 0; j < n - 1; j++) {
// Swap adjacent elements if they are in decreasing order
if (a[j] > a[j + 1]) {
swap(a[j], a[j + 1]);
}
}
}
var array = [4, 2, 3, 1],
counter = 0,
i, j, n = array.length;
for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
for (j = 0; j < n - 1; j++) {
if (array[j] > array[j + 1]) {
[array[j + 1], array[j]] = [array[j], array[j + 1]];
++counter;
}
}
}
console.log(counter);
console.log(array);

I found the solution
var a = [4,2,3,1]
function sortArray(a){
let swapCount = 0;
let swapOccurred = true;
let index = 0;
while (swapOccurred == true && index < a.length){
swapOccurred == false;
if (a[index] > a[index+1]){
let holder = a[index]
a[index] = a[index+1];
a[index+1] = holder;
swapOccurred == true;
swapCount ++;
index = -1;
}
index ++
}
function countSwaps(a) {
let swapCount = 0;
[a, swapCount] = sortArray(a)
console.log(swapCount)
}
return [a, swapCount]
}

Performance: why is the first implementation of the same algorithm significantly faster

The algorithm is taken from LeetCode: https://leetcode.com/problems/maximum-product-of-word-lengths/description/
Here is the jsperf I created (I have some local tests which gives the same result): https://jsperf.com/maximum-product-of-word-lengths
Here is the first "slow" implementation:
function maxProduct (words) {
if (!words || !words.length) return 0;
let len = words.length;
let values = [];
// console.log(values)
for (let i = 0; i < len; ++i) {
let tmp = words[i];
let num = 0, len = tmp.length;
for (let j = 0; j < len; ++j) {
num |= 1 << (tmp.charCodeAt(j) - 'a'.charCodeAt(0));
}
values[i] = {
num: num,
len: tmp.length
};
}
let maxProduct = 0;
for (let i = 0; i < len; ++i) {
for (let j = 0; j < len; ++j) {
if ((values[i].num & values[j].num) == 0) {
maxProduct = Math.max(maxProduct, values[i].len * values[j].len);
}
}
}
return maxProduct;
};
Here is the "fast" implementation:
function maxProductFast (words) {
var temp = [];
for(var i = 0; i < words.length; i++){
var tempObj = {};
tempObj.item = words[i];
var num = 0;
for(var j = 0; j < words[i].length; j++){
num |= 1 << (words[i].charCodeAt(j) - 97);
}
tempObj.num = num;
temp.push(tempObj);
}
var res = 0;
for(var i = 0; i < temp.length; i++){
for(var j = i + 1; j < temp.length; j++){
var item1 = temp[i];
var item2 = temp[j];
if((item1.num & item2.num) == 0) {
res = Math.max(res, item1.item.length * item2.item.length);
}
}
}
return res;
}

They're not the same. The second algorithm has a loop with a complexity of (n*(n+1))/2 where each progressive step is from i+1 to the length of temp. the first algorithm has a two nested for loops each with a cost of n^2. the complexity of both will reduce to O(n^2). I believe that both of these will have a similar performance with a significantly large enough set.
The reason you would do n+1 for each sub iteration is because you are trying to find the max of any pair of items. if you place your elements in a grid you will notice that any diagonal pair a_3 * a_2 = a_2 * a_3 produces the same value. you can basically halve the collection and save a few cycles.

How to program Pascal's Triangle in Javascript - confusion re Arrays

I'm having a little trouble with my attempt at this problem. Code Below:
function pasc(n){
var result = [[1]];
for (var row = 1; row < n; row++){
for (var col = 1; col <= row; col++){
result[row][col] = result[row - 1][col] + result[row - 1][col - 1];
}
}
return result;
}
pasc(10)
for (var i = 0; i < result.length; i++){
document.write(result[i]+"<br>");
}
It seems the problem hinges on assigning values to an array using an expression like myArray[1][1] = "foo"
I'm confused about this because I can do this: var myArray = []; myArray[4] = "foo" which seems to suggest that an element can be created at an arbitrary position in a 1 dimensional array, but not with 2 dimensions.
Any help with clearing up my misconceptions appreciated.

The Pascal's Triangle can be printed using recursion
Below is the code snippet that works recursively.
We have a recursive function pascalRecursive(n, a) that works up till the number of rows are printed. Each row is a element of the 2-D array ('a' in this case)
var numRows = 10,
triangle,
start,
stop;
// N is the no. of rows/tiers
// a is the 2-D array consisting of the row content
function pascalRecursive(n, a) {
if (n < 2) return a;
var prevRow = a[a.length-1];
var curRow = [1];
for (var i = 1; i < prevRow.length; i++) {
curRow[i] = prevRow[i] + prevRow[i-1];
}
curRow.push(1);
a.push(curRow);
return pascalRecursive(n-1, a); // Call the function recursively
}
var triangle = pascalRecursive(numRows, [[1]]);
for(var i = 0; i < triangle.length; i++)
console.log(triangle[i]+"\n");

JavaScript doesn't have two-dimensional arrays. What it does have is arrays that happen to contain other arrays. So, yes, you can assign a value to any arbitrary position in an array, and the array will magically make itself big enough, filling in any gaps with 'undefined'... but you can't assign a value to any position in a sub-array that you haven't explicitly created yet. You have to assign sub-arrays to the positions of the first array before you can assign values to the positions of the sub-arrays.
Replacing
for (var row = 1; row < n; row++){
for (var col = 1; col <= row; col++){
with
for (var row = 1; row < n; row++){
result[row] = [];
for (var col = 1; col <= row; col++){
should do it. Assuming all of your indexing logic is correct, anyway. You've got some problems there, too, since your initial array only contains a single value, so result[row][col] = result[row - 1][col] + result[row - 1][col - 1]; is accessing at least one cell that has never been defined.

Thanks Logan R. Kearsley. I have now solved it:
function pasc(n){
var result = [];
result[0] = [1];
result[1] = [1,1];
for (var row = 2; row < n; row++){
result[row] = [1];
for (var col = 1; col <= row -1; col++){
result[row][col] = result[row-1][col] + result[row-1][col-1];
result[row].push(1);
}
}
return result;
}
for (var i = 0; i < pasc(10).length; i++){
document.write(pasc(10)[i]+"<br>");
console.log(pasc(10)[i]+"<br>");
}

you can create Pascal's triangle using below code:
function pascal(n) {
var arr = [];
if (n == 1) {
arr[0] = [];
arr[0][0] = 1;
} else if (n == 2) {
arr[0] = [];
arr[0][0] = 1;
arr[1] = [];
arr[1][0] = 1;
arr[1][1] = 1;
} else if (n > 2) {
arr[0] = [];
arr[1] = [];
arr[0][0] = 1;
arr[1][0] = 1;
arr[1][1] = 1;
for (i = 2; i < n; i++) {
arr[i] = [];
arr[i][0] = 1;
for (j = 1; j < i; j++) {
arr[i][j] = arr[i - 1][j - 1] + arr[i - 1][j];
}
arr[i][j] = 1;
}
}
console.log(arr);
for (i = 0; i < arr.length; i++) {
console.log(arr[i].join(' '))
}
}
function pascal(n) {
var arr = [];
if (n == 1) {
arr[0] = [];
arr[0][0] = 1;
} else if (n == 2) {
arr[0] = [];
arr[0][0] = 1;
arr[1] = [];
arr[1][0] = 1;
arr[1][1] = 1;
} else if (n > 2) {
arr[0] = [];
arr[1] = [];
arr[0][0] = 1;
arr[1][0] = 1;
arr[1][1] = 1;
for (i = 2; i < n; i++) {
arr[i] = [];
arr[i][0] = 1;
for (j = 1; j < i; j++) {
arr[i][j] = arr[i - 1][j - 1] + arr[i - 1][j];
}
arr[i][j] = 1;
}
}
console.log(arr);
for (i = 0; i < arr.length; i++) {
console.log(arr[i].join(' '))
}
}
pascal(5)

This function will calculate Pascal's Triangle for "n" number of rows. It will create an object that holds "n" number of arrays, which are created as needed in the second/inner for loop.
function getPascalsTriangle(n) {
var arr = {};
for(var row = 0; row < n; row++) {
arr[row] = [];
for(var col = 0; col < row+1; col++) {
if(col === 0 || col === row) {
arr[row][col] = 1;
} else {
arr[row][col] = arr[row-1][col-1] + arr[row-1][col];
}
}
}
return arr;
}
console.log(getPascalsTriangle(5));

Floyd triangle
You can try the following code for a Floyd triangle
var prevNumber=1,i,depth=10;
for(i=0;i<depth;i++){
tempStr = "";j=0;
while(j<= i){
tempStr = tempStr + " " + prevNumber;
j++;
prevNumber++;
}
console.log(tempStr);
}

You can create arbitrary 2d arrays and store it in there and return the correct Pascal.
JavaScript does not have a special syntax for creating multidimensional arrays. A common workaround is to create an array of arrays in nested loops.
source
Here is my version of the solution
function pascal(input) {
var result = [[1], [1,1]];
if (input < 0) {
return [];
}
if (input === 0) {
return result[0];
}
for(var j = result.length-1; j < input; j++) {
var newArray = [];
var firstItem = result[j][0];
var lastItem = result[j][result[j].length -1];
newArray.push(firstItem);
for (var i =1; i <= j; i++) {
console.log(result[j][i-1], result[j][i]);
newArray.push(sum(result[j][i-1], result[j][i]));
}
newArray.push(lastItem);
result.push(newArray);
}
return result[input];
}
function sum(one, two) {
return one + two;
}

Here is the code i created for pascal triangle in javascript
'use strict'
let noOfCoinFlipped = 5
let probabiltyOfnoOfHead = 2
var dataStorer = [];
for(let i=0;i<=noOfCoinFlipped;i++){
dataStorer[i]=[];
for(let j=0;j<=i;j++){
if(i==0){
dataStorer[i][j] = 1;
}
else{
let param1 = (j==0)?0:dataStorer[i-1][j-1];
let param2 = dataStorer[i-1][j]?dataStorer[i-1][j]:0;
dataStorer[i][j] = param1+param2;
}
}
}
let totalPoints = dataStorer[noOfCoinFlipped].reduce((s,n)=>{return s+n;})
let successPoints = dataStorer[noOfCoinFlipped][probabiltyOfnoOfHead];
console.log(successPoints*100/totalPoints)
Here is the link as well
http://rextester.com/TZX59990

This is my solve:
function pascalTri(n){
let arr=[];
let c=0;
for(let i=1;i<=n;i++){
arr.push(1);
let len=arr.length;
if(i>1){
if(i>2){
for(let j=1;j<=(i-2);j++){
let idx=(len-(2*i)+j+2+c);
let val=arr[idx]+arr[idx+1];
arr.push(val);
}
c++;
}
arr.push(1);
}
}
return arr;
}
let pascalArr=pascalTri(7);
console.log(pascalArr);

here is the pattern for n = 3
#
##
###
here is js code to print this.
function staircase(n) {
for(var i=0 ; i<n ; i++) {
for(var j=n-1 ; j>i ; j--)
process.stdout.write(" ");
for(var k=0 ; k<=i; k++) {
process.stdout.write("#");
}
process.stdout.write("\n");
}
}

class PascalTriangle {
constructor(n) {
this.n = n;
}
factoriel(m) {
let result = 1;
if (m === 0) {
return 1;
}
while (m > 0) {
result *= m;
m--;
}
return result;
}
fill() {
let arr = [];
for (let i = 0; i < this.n; i++) {
arr.push([]);
}
for (let i = 0; i < arr.length; i++) {
for (let j = 0; j <= i; j++) {
arr[i].push(this.factoriel(i) / (this.factoriel(j) * this.factoriel(i - j)));
}
}
return arr;
}
}

var m = prompt("enter number:");
var arrMain = new Array();
for (var i = 0; i < m; i++) {
arrMain[i] = [];
}
for (var i = 0; i < m; i++) {
if (i == 0) {
arrMain[i] = [1];
} else if (i == 1) {
(arrMain[i]) = [1, 1];
} else {
for (var j = 0; j <= i; j++) {
if (j == 0 || j == arrMain[i - 1].length) {
arrMain[i][j] = 1;
} else {
arrMain[i][j] = arrMain[i - 1][j] + arrMain[i - 1][j - 1];
}
}
}
document.write(arrMain[i] + "<br>");
}

This is my take on this problem by gaining access to the previous row.
const generate = numRows => {
const triangle = [[1]]
for (let i = 1; i < numRows; i++) {
// Previous row
const previous = triangle[i - 1]
// Current row
const current = new Array(i + 1).fill(1)
// Populate the current row with the previous
// row's values
for (let j = 1; j < i; j++) {
current[j] = previous[j - 1] + previous[j]
}
// Add to triangle result
triangle.push(current)
}
return triangle
}