Develop Reference

Edit multiple objects in array using mongoose (MongoDB)

So I tried several ways, but I can't, I can modify several objects with the same key but I can't modify any with different keys, if anyone can help me is quite a complex problem
{
id: 123,
"infos": [
{ name: 'Joe', value: 'Disabled', id: 0 },
{ name: 'Adam', value: 'Enabled', id: 0 }
]
};
In my database I have a collection with an array and several objects inside which gives this.
I want to modify these objects, filter by their name and modify the value.
To give you a better example, my site returns me an object with the new data, and I want to modify the database object with the new object, without clearing the array, the name key never changes.
const object = [
{ name: 'Joe', value: 'Hey', id: 1 },
{ name: 'Adam', value: 'None', id: 1 }
];
for(const obj in object) {
Schema.findOneAndUpdate({ id: 123 }, {
$set: {
[`infos.${obj}.value`]: "Test"
}
})
}
This code works but it is not optimized, it makes several requests, I would like to do everything in one request, and also it doesn't update the id, only the value.
If anyone can help me that would be great, I've looked everywhere and can't find anything
My schema structure
new Schema({
id: { "type": String, "required": true, "unique": true },
infos: []
})
I use the $addToSet method to insert objects into the infos array

Try This :
db.collection.update({
id: 123,
},
{
$set: {
"infos.$[x].value": "Value",
"infos.$[x].name": "User"
}
},
{
arrayFilters: [
{
"x.id": {
$in: [
1
]
}
},
],
multi: true
})
The all positional $[] operator acts as a placeholder for all elements in the array field.
In $in you can use dynamic array of id.
Ex :
const ids = [1,2,..n]
db.collection.update(
//Same code as it is...
{
arrayFilters: [
{
"x.id": {
$in: ids
}
},
],
multi: true
})
MongoPlayGround Link : https://mongoplayground.net/p/Tuz831lkPqk

Maybe you look for something like this:
db.collection.update({},
{
$set: {
"infos.$[x].value": "test1",
"infos.$[x].id": 10,
"infos.$[y].value": "test2",
"infos.$[y].id": 20
}
},
{
arrayFilters: [
{
"x.name": "Adam"
},
{
"y.name": "Joe"
}
],
multi: true
})
Explained:
You define arrayFilters for all names in objects you have and update the values & id in all documents ...
playground

How does one create custom filter conditions for array items upon ever newly computed query-data?

I have a filter object that is returned by query params
url = /all?channels=calls,text&calls=voicemail,missed
const query = {
channels: 'calls,texts',
calls: 'voicemail,missed',
};
I then have an array of objects that come in from a socket.
const arr = [
{
id: 1,
channel: 'SMS',
sent: '2021-08-22T03:21:18.41650+0000',
sender: {
contactType: 'business',
},
recipients: [
{
contactType: 'corporate',
},
],
direction: 'INBOUND',
},
{
id: 2,
channel: 'VOICE',
sent: '2021-08-20T23:15:56.00000+0000',
sender: {
contactType: 'business',
},
recipients: [
{
contactType: 'corporate',
},
],
callDetails: {
answered: false,
voicemail: true,
},
direction: 'INBOUND',
},
{
id: 3,
channel: 'VOICE',
sent: '2021-08-20T23:15:56.00000+0000',
sender: {
contactType: 'business',
},
recipients: [
{
contactType: 'corporate',
},
],
callDetails: {
answered: true,
voicemail: false,
},
direction: 'INBOUND',
},
{
id: 4,
channel: 'VOICE',
sent: '2021-08-20T23:15:56.00000+0000',
sender: {
contactType: 'business',
},
recipients: [
{
contactType: 'corporate',
},
],
callDetails: {
answered: false,
voicemail: false,
},
direction: 'INBOUND',
},
];
I want to filter out the objects that match the filters but the query obj isn't friendly enough to just map the arr through.
With the query obj shared above, i should return the objects id:1 and id:2 and id:4 from arr, since those object meet the criteria of sms, voicemail, & missed
I assume i need a modified query obj that has to have various conditions available for each property, i.e calls: voicemail === callDetails.voicemail === true or calls: received === callDetails.answered === true
I've seen lots of examples on how to filter an array of objects with multiple match-criteria, but with the req of the property having multiple conditions, i've hit a wall.
thanks for the help

The main idea is to provide kind of a rosetta stone which does bridge/map the query specific syntax with any list item's specific data structure. Thus one will end up writing a map which takes a query's structure into account but ensures for each necessary query endpoint an item specific filter condition/function.
The query function should simply filter the item list by applying a list of logical OR conditions, thus using some for returning the boolean filter value.
Which leaves one of implementing a helper method which collects ... via Object.entries and Array.prototype.flatMap as well as via String.prototype.split and Array.prototype.map ... the function endpoints from the above introduced requirements configuration/map, based on the query object, provided by the system. Thus this helper might be named resolveQuery.
const sampleList = [{
id: 1,
channel: 'SMS',
direction: 'INBOUND',
}, {
id: 2,
channel: 'VOICE',
callDetails: {
answered: false,
voicemail: true,
},
direction: 'INBOUND',
}, {
id: 3,
channel: 'VOICE',
callDetails: {
answered: true,
voicemail: false,
},
direction: 'INBOUND',
}, {
id: 4,
channel: 'VOICE',
callDetails: {
answered: false,
voicemail: false,
},
direction: 'INBOUND',
}];
// prepare a `requirements` map which ...
// - on one hand maps `query`-syntax to a list items's structure
// - and on the other hand does so by providing an item specific
// filter condition/function for each necessary query endpoint.
const requirements = {
channels: {
texts: item => item.channel === 'SMS',
},
calls: {
voicemail: item => item.channel === 'VOICE' && !!item.callDetails.voicemail,
missed: item => item.channel === 'VOICE' && !item.callDetails.answered,
},
}
// const query = {
// channels: 'calls,texts',
// calls: 'voicemail,missed',
// };
function resolveQuery(requirements, query) {
const reject = item => false;
// create/collect a list of filter condition/functions
// which later will be applied as logical OR via `some`.
return Object
.entries(query)
.flatMap(([ groupKey, groupValue ]) =>
// e.g groupKey => 'channels',
// groupValue => 'calls,texts'
groupValue
.split(',')
.map(requirementKey =>
// e.g requirementKey => 'calls'
// or requirementKey => 'texts'
requirements?.[groupKey]?.[requirementKey?.trim()] ?? reject
)
);
}
function queryFromItemList(itemList, requirements, query) {
const conditionList = resolveQuery(requirements, query);
console.log(
'conditionList ... [\n ',
conditionList.join(',\n '),
'\n]'
);
return itemList.filter(item =>
conditionList.some(condition => condition(item))
);
}
console.log(
queryFromItemList(sampleList, requirements, {
channels: 'calls,texts',
calls: 'voicemail,missed',
})
);
.as-console-wrapper { min-height: 100%!important; top: 0; }

How to conditionally add a field based on match a field with an array Mongo

I'm trying to create a pipeline to add a field based in a condition:
I have a field called helpful which is an array that will contain a list of id's, what I want to do is add a field depending if a given ID is insided that array
an example of the data structure may be this:
{
helpful: [ 5ecd62230a180f0017dc5342 ],
verifiedPurchase: false,
_id: 5f789010e07e4033342c7307,
title: 'text',
body: 'text',
rating: 3,
user: {
_id: 5ecd62230a180f0017dc5342,
name: 'store11',
picture: 'pictureurl'
},
replies: [],
updatedAt: 2020-10-03T18:04:48.026Z,
createdAt: 2020-10-03T14:52:00.410Z,
helpfulCount: 1,
helpfulForMe: false
},
I already tried with this pipeline
{
$addFields:{
helpfulForMe: {
$cond: {
if: {"$in":[user, "$helpful"] } ,
then: true,
else: false,
}
}
}
},
and this one
"$addFields": {
"helpfulForMe" : {
"$in":[
['5ecd62230a180f0017dc5342'], "$helpful"
]
}
}
},
but both returned false even when I set a matching ID
I hope to get a good fix from you guys. Thanks

You can try if your input is array of ids,
$reduce to iterate loop of helpful array and check condition if id in user array then return true otherwise false
let user = ["5ecd62230a180f0017dc5342"];
{
$addFields: {
helpfulForMe: {
$reduce: {
input: "$helpful",
initialValue: false,
in: {
$cond: [{ $in: ["$$this", user] }, true, "$$value"]
}
}
}
}
}
Playground

Need to count a joined table rows sequelize

I am using sequelize to query on a sqlserver database. I have two tables:
data: columns - id, name, team, type
history:columns - id, node, date, status, data_id(foreignkey)
and a relation
history.belongsTo(data, {foreignKey: 'data_id'}
data.hasMany(history, {foreignKey: 'data_id'})
My query is:
dataModel.findAll({
attributes: ['name'],
include: [{
model:historyModel
}]
})
My result looks like this:
[
{
name: "1",
history: [
{
...
}
]
},
{
name: "2",
history: [
{
...
}
]
}
]`
I want that instead of the history array I will have the count of history objects in each one. The query in sql is:
select data.name, count(history.data_id) count
from history
inner join data on data.id=history.data_id
group by history.data_id, data.name

You can do it this way:
dataModel.findAll({
attributes: {
include: [[Sequelize.fn("COUNT", Sequelize.col("history.data_id")), "historyModelCount"]]
},
include: [{
model: historyModel, attributes: []
}],
group: ['data.id']
});

Sequelize conditional inclusion of where clause nodejs

I have this code, which has multiple where clause:
Time_Sheet_Details.findAll({
include: [
{
model: timesheetNotesSubcon,
required: false,
attributes:["note","file_name", "id", "working_hrs", "timestamp", "has_screenshot", "notes_category"]
},
{
model: Timesheet,
attributes:["id","leads_id","userid"],
where: {leads_id: filters.leads_id}, // Client
include:[
{
model: Lead_Info, attributes:["id","fname","lname","email","hiring_coordinator_id","status"],
where: {hiring_coordinator_id: {$in: filters.sc_id}}, // SC
include:[{
model: adminInfoSchema,
required: false,
attributes:["admin_id","admin_fname", "admin_lname", "admin_email", "signature_contact_nos", "signature_company"],
}]
},
{
model:Personal_Info,attributes:["userid","fname","lname","email"],
where: {userid: filters.subcon_id}, // Subcon
}
]
}],
where: {
reference_date: filters.reference_date
},
order:[
["id","DESC"]
],
offset:((page-1)*limit),
limit : limit,
subQuery:false
}).then(function(foundObject){
willFulfillDeferred.resolve(foundObject);
});
The where clause is the one with the comment Client, SC and Subcon. However, what is the best approach if those where clause is optional? I am using that for search filter. So if filters.leads_id is null then the where: {leads_id: filters.leads_id}, // Client should not be included in the query. Same with the others. The only solution I can think of is repeat those code blocks for each scenario of not null parameters but that's to repetitive and not practical.
Any other approach or solutions?

If I understand correctly, I think as a first step, you should define your respective where clauses, conditionally upon wether or not each specific search criteria is set:
const clientWhere = filters.leads_id ? {leads_id: filters.leads_id} : {}
const scWhere = filters.sc_id ? {hiring_coordinator_id: {$in: filters.sc_id}} : {}
const subconWhere = filters.subcon_id ? {userid: filters.subcon_id} : {}
So at this point if a search option isn't set, there'll just be an empty object as the where clause.
Next, use those pre-defined where clause objects in your query:
Time_Sheet_Details.findAll({
include: [
{
model: timesheetNotesSubcon,
required: false,
attributes:["note","file_name", "id", "working_hrs", "timestamp", "has_screenshot", "notes_category"]
},
{
model: Timesheet,
attributes:["id","leads_id","userid"],
where: clientWhere, // Client
include:[
{
model: Lead_Info, attributes:["id","fname","lname","email","hiring_coordinator_id","status"],
where: scWhere, // SC
include:[{
model: adminInfoSchema,
required: false,
attributes:["admin_id","admin_fname", "admin_lname", "admin_email", "signature_contact_nos", "signature_company"],
}]
},
{
model:Personal_Info,attributes:["userid","fname","lname","email"],
where: subconWhere, // Subcon
}
]
}],
where: {
reference_date: filters.reference_date
},
order:[
["id","DESC"]
],
offset:((page-1)*limit),
limit : limit,
subQuery:false
}).then(function(foundObject){
willFulfillDeferred.resolve(foundObject);
});