I use WeatherAPI's service, which returns the weather forecast given the city name
The URL looks like this https://api.weatherapi.com/v1/forecast.json?key=[API_KEY]&q=tokyo&aqi=no
After trying to paste that URL into my browser and pasting the result into a JSON beautifier, here's the result
Here's the weird part. I tried using axios to fetch the information from my app and printing it out, this is what it gave me
It was unable to fetch forecastday and instead gave me a [Object], which didn't make any sense to me since it worked just fine on my browser
Here's my code (sorry for the spaghetti formatting)
https://pastebin.com/9eJQy5Bf
I tried reinstalling the library, using proxies but the result remained the same.
forecast.forecastday is an object array, to access a property from a particular object, you have to specify the index of the object in the array.
For example if you want the date property of the first object.
const data = {
forecast: {
forecastday: [{
date: "2022-04-03"
}]
}
}
const date = data.forecast.forecastday[0].date; // index [0] = first element
console.log(date);
If you would have multiple days, you could loop over them or use a function like map() to get the specific items.
const data = {
forecast: {
forecastday: [{
date: "2022-04-03",
date_epoch: 123456789
},
{
date: "2022-04-04",
date_epoch: 123456789
}
]
}
}
const dates = data.forecast.forecastday.map(({ date }) => {
return { date }
});
console.log(dates);
Related
I receive JSON data from the service, but the keys change in the data with each request, below I will give an example in three versions.
Exmaple 1:
{
"trackingPayloads": {
"Rltyn4gLRIWRKj9kS0YpWXytG81GZwcPWjEE7f31ALlq": "{"title":"Red Shoes","index":3,"id":"17777","type":"category"}',
"ywtA6OyM0hzVZZvnUjxoxJDI1Er9ArfNr8XKyi1D5Zzk": "{"title":"White Shoes","index":3,"id":"17777","type":"category"}',
}
}
Example 2:
{
"trackingPayloads": {
"36tW7DqZ3H9KKBEAumZmowmUwmDRmVCjQgv5zi9GM3Kz": "{"title":"Red Shoes","index":3,"id":"17777","type":"category"}',
"OgtE51n3YtvrVXWLFjPmpnRt2k5DExF7ovxmBTZrZ6wV": "{"title":"White Shoes","index":3,"id":"17777","type":"category"}',
}
}
Example 3:
{
"trackingPayloads": {
"k2toY29glt2JEp9Wi1X5M7ocno0E0mS4JQVyDuGyQ2rM": "{"title":"Red Shoes","index":3,"id":"17777","type":"category"}'",
"5ef2ec3c3573eebecc9690b69619ec7b9c93b609": "{"title":"White Shoes","index":3,"id":"17777","type":"category"}',
}
}
As you can see, the data included in the keys does not change since I am requesting the same information, but the key will change with each request.
Please help, what are the options to get the data Title, Index and any other content in these keys using node js?
Only one option came to my mind - to rename the keys upon receipt in 1,2,3 ... and then get data from them, but this needs to be done dynamically, since about 120 requests per minute are made, you need to get this data quickly, there are no options to save it to a file (I didn’t understand how)
UPDATE, added my code.
I am attaching an example of my code, the idea is to eventually get the data I need from the right keys from trackingPayloads, please help with the code <3
const AwaitAPIResponse = await ProductAPI(product_sku);
const $ = cheerio.load(AwaitAPIResponse);
const JSONDATA = [];
$('pre').each(function() {
JSONDATA.push($(this).text());
});
const ProductJson = JSON.parse(JSONDATA[0]) // this is where I get all the data
const MainJson = ProductJson["trackingPayloads"] // here I go to the trackingPayloads you saw above
How can I get the data I need?
You can use Object.keys() to get all the different keys of an object and use a loop to go through them.
Therefore, you can rework this code in such a way that each of the values is stored as an element in an array, maybe makes the data easier to work with:
const convert = object => {
const ret = []
for (const key of Object.keys(object)) {
ret.push(object[key])
}
return ret
}
This will give you following result for your use case:
[{"title":"Red Shoes","index":3,"id":"17777","type":"category"},
{"title":"Red Shoes","index":3,"id":"17777","type":"category"}]
The way you'd call this is as follows:
const some_parsed_json = {
"k2toY29glt2JEp9Wi1X5M7ocno0E0mS4JQVyDuGyQ2rM": {
title:"Red Shoes",
index:3,
id:"17777",
type:"category"
},
"5ef2ec3c3573eebecc9690b69619ec7b9c93b609": {
title:"Red Shoes",
index:3,
id:"17777",
type:"category"
}
}
const json_object_values = convertor(some_parsed_json)
If you don't car about the key you could use Object.values on the received object to get the values
Object.values(payload)
// With your example it will return:
// [{"title":"Red Shoes","index":3,"id":"17777","type":"category"},
// {"title":"Red Shoes","index":3,"id":"17777","type":"category"}]
or in a more complete example
async function getParsedValues() {
const responseString = await service.getData(); // '{"trackingPayloads":{"Rltyn4gLRIWRKj9kS0YpWXytG81GZwcPWjEE7f31ALlq":{"title":"Red Shoes","index":3,"id":"17777","type":"category"},"ywtA6OyM0hzVZZvnUjxoxJDI1Er9ArfNr8XKyi1D5Zzk":{"title":"White Shoes","index":3,"id":"17777","type":"category"}}}'
const parsedResponse = JSON.parse(responseString); // { trackingPayloads: { Rltyn4gLRIWRKj9kS0YpWXytG81GZwcPWjEE7f31ALlq: { title:'RedShoes', index: 3, id: '17777', type: 'category' }, ywtA6OyM0hzVZZvnUjxoxJDI1Er9ArfNr8XKyi1D5Zzk:{title:'WhiteShoes', index: 3, id: '17777', type: 'category' } }}
const values = Object.values(parsedResponse); // [{"title":"Red Shoes","index":3,"id":"17777","type":"category"}, {title:'WhiteShoes', index: 3, id: '17777', type: 'category' }]
return values;
}
I have a table that is dynamically generated using PHP and a MySQL table/database... I also have figured out how to use filters. The problem is that it only lets you use one filter at a time... Here is a screenshot of what I mean: screenshot
You can only filter by description or by date... not both.
Is there some way to do this? I can't really provide you any HTML/JavaScript code as you won't see anything because the table data comes from a database but let me know if you need any more detail...
Thanks!
If I understood your question properly, you can do something like this:
Let's assume we have an array of objects
const data = [
{
id: 0,
date: '1609084588132',
description: 'something'
},
{
id: 1,
date: '1609087588132',
description: 'anything'
},
{
id: 2,
date: '1609087588132',
description: 'anything'
}
]
And to filter this array by two properties, you can do something like:
const filteredData = data.filter((item) => {
if (item.date > 'some date' && item.description.includes('anyth')) {
return true;
}
return false;
});
console.log(filteredData)
I think you got an idea, we filtered the array above with two conditions: id must be bigger than 0 and description string must contain 'anyth'.
I'm currently trying Firestore, and I'm stuck at something very simple: "updating an array (aka a subdocument)".
My DB structure is super simple. For example:
proprietary: "John Doe",
sharedWith:
[
{who: "first#test.com", when:timestamp},
{who: "another#test.com", when:timestamp},
],
I'm trying (without success) to push new records into shareWith array of objects.
I've tried:
// With SET
firebase.firestore()
.collection('proprietary')
.doc(docID)
.set(
{ sharedWith: [{ who: "third#test.com", when: new Date() }] },
{ merge: true }
)
// With UPDATE
firebase.firestore()
.collection('proprietary')
.doc(docID)
.update({ sharedWith: [{ who: "third#test.com", when: new Date() }] })
None works. These queries overwrite my array.
The answer might be simple, but I could'nt find it...
Firestore now has two functions that allow you to update an array without re-writing the entire thing.
Link: https://firebase.google.com/docs/firestore/manage-data/add-data, specifically https://firebase.google.com/docs/firestore/manage-data/add-data#update_elements_in_an_array
Update elements in an array
If your document contains an array field, you can use arrayUnion() and
arrayRemove() to add and remove elements. arrayUnion() adds elements
to an array but only elements not already present. arrayRemove()
removes all instances of each given element.
Edit 08/13/2018: There is now support for native array operations in Cloud Firestore. See Doug's answer below.
There is currently no way to update a single array element (or add/remove a single element) in Cloud Firestore.
This code here:
firebase.firestore()
.collection('proprietary')
.doc(docID)
.set(
{ sharedWith: [{ who: "third#test.com", when: new Date() }] },
{ merge: true }
)
This says to set the document at proprietary/docID such that sharedWith = [{ who: "third#test.com", when: new Date() } but to not affect any existing document properties. It's very similar to the update() call you provided however the set() call with create the document if it does not exist while the update() call will fail.
So you have two options to achieve what you want.
Option 1 - Set the whole array
Call set() with the entire contents of the array, which will require reading the current data from the DB first. If you're concerned about concurrent updates you can do all of this in a transaction.
Option 2 - Use a subcollection
You could make sharedWith a subcollection of the main document. Then
adding a single item would look like this:
firebase.firestore()
.collection('proprietary')
.doc(docID)
.collection('sharedWith')
.add({ who: "third#test.com", when: new Date() })
Of course this comes with new limitations. You would not be able to query
documents based on who they are shared with, nor would you be able to
get the doc and all of the sharedWith data in a single operation.
Here is the latest example from the Firestore documentation:
firebase.firestore.FieldValue.ArrayUnion
var washingtonRef = db.collection("cities").doc("DC");
// Atomically add a new region to the "regions" array field.
washingtonRef.update({
regions: firebase.firestore.FieldValue.arrayUnion("greater_virginia")
});
// Atomically remove a region from the "regions" array field.
washingtonRef.update({
regions: firebase.firestore.FieldValue.arrayRemove("east_coast")
});
You can use a transaction (https://firebase.google.com/docs/firestore/manage-data/transactions) to get the array, push onto it and then update the document:
const booking = { some: "data" };
const userRef = this.db.collection("users").doc(userId);
this.db.runTransaction(transaction => {
// This code may get re-run multiple times if there are conflicts.
return transaction.get(userRef).then(doc => {
if (!doc.data().bookings) {
transaction.set({
bookings: [booking]
});
} else {
const bookings = doc.data().bookings;
bookings.push(booking);
transaction.update(userRef, { bookings: bookings });
}
});
}).then(function () {
console.log("Transaction successfully committed!");
}).catch(function (error) {
console.log("Transaction failed: ", error);
});
Sorry Late to party but Firestore solved it way back in aug 2018 so If you still looking for that here it is all issues solved with regards to arrays.
https://firebase.googleblog.com/2018/08/better-arrays-in-cloud-firestore.htmlOfficial blog post
array-contains, arrayRemove, arrayUnion for checking, removing and updating arrays. Hope it helps.
To build on Sam Stern's answer, there is also a 3rd option which made things easier for me and that is using what Google call a Map, which is essentially a dictionary.
I think a dictionary is far better for the use case you're describing. I usually use arrays for stuff that isn't really updated too much, so they are more or less static. But for stuff that gets written a lot, specifically values that need to be updated for fields that are linked to something else in the database, dictionaries prove to be much easier to maintain and work with.
So for your specific case, the DB structure would look like this:
proprietary: "John Doe"
sharedWith:{
whoEmail1: {when: timestamp},
whoEmail2: {when: timestamp}
}
This will allow you to do the following:
var whoEmail = 'first#test.com';
var sharedObject = {};
sharedObject['sharedWith.' + whoEmail + '.when'] = new Date();
sharedObject['merge'] = true;
firebase.firestore()
.collection('proprietary')
.doc(docID)
.update(sharedObject);
The reason for defining the object as a variable is that using 'sharedWith.' + whoEmail + '.when' directly in the set method will result in an error, at least when using it in a Node.js cloud function.
#Edit (add explanation :) )
say you have an array you want to update your existing firestore document field with. You can use set(yourData, {merge: true} ) passing setOptions(second param in set function) with {merge: true} is must in order to merge the changes instead of overwriting. here is what the official documentation says about it
An options object that configures the behavior of set() calls in DocumentReference, WriteBatch, and Transaction. These calls can be configured to perform granular merges instead of overwriting the target documents in their entirety by providing a SetOptions with merge: true.
you can use this
const yourNewArray = [{who: "first#test.com", when:timestamp}
{who: "another#test.com", when:timestamp}]
collectionRef.doc(docId).set(
{
proprietary: "jhon",
sharedWith: firebase.firestore.FieldValue.arrayUnion(...yourNewArray),
},
{ merge: true },
);
hope this helps :)
addToCart(docId: string, prodId: string): Promise<void> {
return this.baseAngularFirestore.collection('carts').doc(docId).update({
products:
firestore.FieldValue.arrayUnion({
productId: prodId,
qty: 1
}),
});
}
i know this is really old, but to help people newbies with the issue
firebase V9 provides a solution using the arrayUnion and arrayRemove
await updateDoc(documentRef, {
proprietary: arrayUnion( { sharedWith: [{ who: "third#test.com", when: new Date() }] }
});
check this out for more explanation
Other than the answers mentioned above. This will do it.
Using Angular 5 and AngularFire2. or use firebase.firestore() instead of this.afs
// say you have have the following object and
// database structure as you mentioned in your post
data = { who: "third#test.com", when: new Date() };
...othercode
addSharedWith(data) {
const postDocRef = this.afs.collection('posts').doc('docID');
postDocRef.subscribe( post => {
// Grab the existing sharedWith Array
// If post.sharedWith doesn`t exsit initiated with empty array
const foo = { 'sharedWith' : post.sharedWith || []};
// Grab the existing sharedWith Array
foo['sharedWith'].push(data);
// pass updated to fireStore
postsDocRef.update(foo);
// using .set() will overwrite everything
// .update will only update existing values,
// so we initiated sharedWith with empty array
});
}
We can use arrayUnion({}) method to achive this.
Try this:
collectionRef.doc(ID).update({
sharedWith: admin.firestore.FieldValue.arrayUnion({
who: "first#test.com",
when: new Date()
})
});
Documentation can find here: https://firebase.google.com/docs/firestore/manage-data/add-data#update_elements_in_an_array
Consider John Doe a document rather than a collection
Give it a collection of things and thingsSharedWithOthers
Then you can map and query John Doe's shared things in that parallel thingsSharedWithOthers collection.
proprietary: "John Doe"(a document)
things(collection of John's things documents)
thingsSharedWithOthers(collection of John's things being shared with others):
[thingId]:
{who: "first#test.com", when:timestamp}
{who: "another#test.com", when:timestamp}
then set thingsSharedWithOthers
firebase.firestore()
.collection('thingsSharedWithOthers')
.set(
{ [thingId]:{ who: "third#test.com", when: new Date() } },
{ merge: true }
)
If You want to Update an array in a firebase document.
You can do this.
var documentRef = db.collection("Your collection name").doc("Your doc name")
documentRef.update({
yourArrayName: firebase.firestore.FieldValue.arrayUnion("The Value you want to enter")});
Although firebase.firestore.FieldValue.arrayUnion() provides the solution for array update in firestore, at the same time it is required to use {merge:true}. If you do not use {merge:true} it will delete all other fields in the document while updating with the new value. Here is the working code for updating array without loosing data in the reference document with .set() method:
const docRef = firebase.firestore().collection("your_collection_name").doc("your_doc_id");
docRef.set({yourArrayField: firebase.firestore.FieldValue.arrayUnion("value_to_add")}, {merge:true});
If anybody is looking for Java firestore sdk solution to add items in array field:
List<String> list = java.util.Arrays.asList("A", "B");
Object[] fieldsToUpdate = list.toArray();
DocumentReference docRef = getCollection().document("docId");
docRef.update(fieldName, FieldValue.arrayUnion(fieldsToUpdate));
To delete items from array user: FieldValue.arrayRemove()
If the document contains a nested object in the form of an array, .dot notation can be used to reference and update nested fields.
Node.js example:
const users = {
name: 'Tom',
surname: 'Smith',
favorites: {
sport: 'tennis',
color: 'red',
subject: 'math'
}
};
const update = await db.collection('users').doc('Tom').update({
'favorites.sport': 'snowboard'
});
or Android sdk example:
db.collection("users").document("Tom")
.update(
'favorites.sport': 'snowboard'
);
There is a simple hack in firestore:
use path with "." as property name:
propertyname.arraysubname.${id}:
db.collection("collection")
.doc("docId")
.update({arrayOfObj: fieldValue.arrayUnion({...item})})
I'm using vue multiselect for a project with laravel.
The selected values are saved in the database in this way.
['value_on','value_two','value_three', and so on...]
In the part where the user can do the updates I need to display the values coming from the database.
This is the object I need to create
sizeValue: [
{size: 'val_one},
{size: 'val_two},
{size: 'val_three}
...and so on
]
Right now I just have an empty array where I should loop the data from the database.
//This is the empty array
sizeValue: [];
//This is the array coming from the server it will return['val_one','val_two','val_three',...and so on]
product.sizes
Since I don't have much experience with javascript I would like to ask how I can get this result
sizeValue: [
{size: 'val_one},
{size: 'val_two},
{size: 'val_three}
...and so on
]
looping the values (product.sizes) coming from the DB in the empty sizeValue.
you could simply create the sizeValue as a computed property and use the javascript map function.
This could look like this:
<script>
export default {
computed: {
sizeValue() {
return this.product.sizes.map(productSize => {
return {
size: productSize
};
});
}
}
};
</script>
Hope this helps :)
In my React application, I have a filter component. Everytime I apply filters, I am calling an api by passing the selected filter values from Front End. Filter component has checkboxes so when I am selecting multiple values, it is being passed as an array of strings currently. I want to send the selected filter values as string instead of Array of Strings. I have total 2 filters- Date, Name. In my Parent component, the filters param in handleFilterChange will have all two values i.e Name as Array of Strings and Date as String which I am sending in request payload as part of filterCondition object. I want to change Name alone to String.
ParentComponent.js-
const ParentComponent = props => {
const [filterObj, setFilterObj] = useState({});
const handleFilterChange = filters => {
console.log(filters); // Show the filter values-Date(String), Name(Array of Strings)
const reqParams ={
id,
filterCondition: filters // An object with Name(Array) and date(string)
}
setFilterObj(filterObj);
//API call which will pass filters in request params
fetchApi(reqParams);
};
return (
<ChildComponent onChange={handleFilterChange} />
);
}
fetchApi will always send name and Date in filterCondition object. My code is working fine, the only change I want to do now is to change Array to String for name.Currently, with the above code my request structure looks like this-
Current Request Structure-
{
id:1,
filterCondition: {
name: ['XYZ', 'ABC'],
date: '2020-06-29T00:00:00'
}
}
I want my request to be like below-
Expected request structure-
{
id:1,
filterCondition: {
name: 'XYZ, ABC',
date: '2020-06-29T00:00:00'
}
}
Can someone help me understand how can I achieve the above expected request structure.
To convert Array to String you can use join(separator) function
var obj = {
id:1,
filterCondition: {
name: ['XYZ', 'ABC'].join(','),
date: '2020-06-29T00:00:00'
}
}
console.log(obj);