When fetching data I'm getting: Can't perform a React state update on an unmounted component. The app still works, but react is suggesting I might be causing a memory leak.
This is a no-op, but it indicates a memory leak in your application. To fix, cancel all subscriptions and asynchronous tasks in a useEffect cleanup function."
Why do I keep getting this warning?
I tried researching these solutions:
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/AbortSignal
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/AbortController
but this still was giving me the warning.
const ArtistProfile = props => {
const [artistData, setArtistData] = useState(null)
const token = props.spotifyAPI.user_token
const fetchData = () => {
const id = window.location.pathname.split("/").pop()
console.log(id)
props.spotifyAPI.getArtistProfile(id, ["album"], "US", 10)
.then(data => {setArtistData(data)})
}
useEffect(() => {
fetchData()
return () => { props.spotifyAPI.cancelRequest() }
}, [])
return (
<ArtistProfileContainer>
<AlbumContainer>
{artistData ? artistData.artistAlbums.items.map(album => {
return (
<AlbumTag
image={album.images[0].url}
name={album.name}
artists={album.artists}
key={album.id}
/>
)
})
: null}
</AlbumContainer>
</ArtistProfileContainer>
)
}
Edit:
In my api file I added an AbortController() and used a signal so I can cancel a request.
export function spotifyAPI() {
const controller = new AbortController()
const signal = controller.signal
// code ...
this.getArtist = (id) => {
return (
fetch(
`https://api.spotify.com/v1/artists/${id}`, {
headers: {"Authorization": "Bearer " + this.user_token}
}, {signal})
.then(response => {
return checkServerStat(response.status, response.json())
})
)
}
// code ...
// this is my cancel method
this.cancelRequest = () => controller.abort()
}
My spotify.getArtistProfile() looks like this
this.getArtistProfile = (id,includeGroups,market,limit,offset) => {
return Promise.all([
this.getArtist(id),
this.getArtistAlbums(id,includeGroups,market,limit,offset),
this.getArtistTopTracks(id,market)
])
.then(response => {
return ({
artist: response[0],
artistAlbums: response[1],
artistTopTracks: response[2]
})
})
}
but because my signal is used for individual api calls that are resolved in a Promise.all I can't abort() that promise so I will always be setting the state.
For me, clean the state in the unmount of the component helped.
const [state, setState] = useState({});
useEffect(() => {
myFunction();
return () => {
setState({}); // This worked for me
};
}, []);
const myFunction = () => {
setState({
name: 'Jhon',
surname: 'Doe',
})
}
Sharing the AbortController between the fetch() requests is the right approach.
When any of the Promises are aborted, Promise.all() will reject with AbortError:
function Component(props) {
const [fetched, setFetched] = React.useState(false);
React.useEffect(() => {
const ac = new AbortController();
Promise.all([
fetch('http://placekitten.com/1000/1000', {signal: ac.signal}),
fetch('http://placekitten.com/2000/2000', {signal: ac.signal})
]).then(() => setFetched(true))
.catch(ex => console.error(ex));
return () => ac.abort(); // Abort both fetches on unmount
}, []);
return fetched;
}
const main = document.querySelector('main');
ReactDOM.render(React.createElement(Component), main);
setTimeout(() => ReactDOM.unmountComponentAtNode(main), 1); // Unmount after 1ms
<script src="//cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/react/16.8.3/umd/react.development.js"></script>
<script src="//cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/react-dom/16.8.3/umd/react-dom.development.js"></script>
<main></main>
For example, you have some component that does some asynchronous actions, then writes the result to state and displays the state content on a page:
export default function MyComponent() {
const [loading, setLoading] = useState(false);
const [someData, setSomeData] = useState({});
// ...
useEffect( () => {
(async () => {
setLoading(true);
someResponse = await doVeryLongRequest(); // it takes some time
// When request is finished:
setSomeData(someResponse.data); // (1) write data to state
setLoading(false); // (2) write some value to state
})();
}, []);
return (
<div className={loading ? "loading" : ""}>
{someData}
<Link to="SOME_LOCAL_LINK">Go away from here!</Link>
</div>
);
}
Let's say that user clicks some link when doVeryLongRequest() still executes. MyComponent is unmounted but the request is still alive and when it gets a response it tries to set state in lines (1) and (2) and tries to change the appropriate nodes in HTML. We'll get an error from subject.
We can fix it by checking whether compponent is still mounted or not. Let's create a componentMounted ref (line (3) below) and set it true. When component is unmounted we'll set it to false (line (4) below). And let's check the componentMounted variable every time we try to set state (line (5) below).
The code with fixes:
export default function MyComponent() {
const [loading, setLoading] = useState(false);
const [someData, setSomeData] = useState({});
const componentMounted = useRef(true); // (3) component is mounted
// ...
useEffect( () => {
(async () => {
setLoading(true);
someResponse = await doVeryLongRequest(); // it takes some time
// When request is finished:
if (componentMounted.current){ // (5) is component still mounted?
setSomeData(someResponse.data); // (1) write data to state
setLoading(false); // (2) write some value to state
}
return () => { // This code runs when component is unmounted
componentMounted.current = false; // (4) set it to false when we leave the page
}
})();
}, []);
return (
<div className={loading ? "loading" : ""}>
{someData}
<Link to="SOME_LOCAL_LINK">Go away from here!</Link>
</div>
);
}
Why do I keep getting this warning?
The intention of this warning is to help you prevent memory leaks in your application. If the component updates it's state after it has been unmounted from the DOM, this is an indication that there could be a memory leak, but it is an indication with a lot of false positives.
How do I know if I have a memory leak?
You have a memory leak if an object that lives longer than your component holds a reference to it, either directly or indirectly. This usually happens when you subscribe to events or changes of some kind without unsubscribing when your component unmounts from the DOM.
It typically looks like this:
useEffect(() => {
function handleChange() {
setState(store.getState())
}
// "store" lives longer than the component,
// and will hold a reference to the handleChange function.
// Preventing the component to be garbage collected after
// unmount.
store.subscribe(handleChange)
// Uncomment the line below to avoid memory leak in your component
// return () => store.unsubscribe(handleChange)
}, [])
Where store is an object that lives further up the React tree (possibly in a context provider), or in global/module scope. Another example is subscribing to events:
useEffect(() => {
function handleScroll() {
setState(window.scrollY)
}
// document is an object in global scope, and will hold a reference
// to the handleScroll function, preventing garbage collection
document.addEventListener('scroll', handleScroll)
// Uncomment the line below to avoid memory leak in your component
// return () => document.removeEventListener(handleScroll)
}, [])
Another example worth remembering is the web API setInterval, which can also cause memory leak if you forget to call clearInterval when unmounting.
But that is not what I am doing, why should I care about this warning?
React's strategy to warn whenever state updates happen after your component has unmounted creates a lot of false positives. The most common I've seen is by setting state after an asynchronous network request:
async function handleSubmit() {
setPending(true)
await post('/someapi') // component might unmount while we're waiting
setPending(false)
}
You could technically argue that this also is a memory leak, since the component isn't released immediately after it is no longer needed. If your "post" takes a long time to complete, then it will take a long time to for the memory to be released. However, this is not something you should worry about, because it will be garbage collected eventually. In these cases, you could simply ignore the warning.
But it is so annoying to see the warning, how do I remove it?
There are a lot of blogs and answers on stackoverflow suggesting to keep track of the mounted state of your component and wrap your state updates in an if-statement:
let isMountedRef = useRef(false)
useEffect(() => {
isMountedRef.current = true
return () => {
isMountedRef.current = false
}
}, [])
async function handleSubmit() {
setPending(true)
await post('/someapi')
if (!isMountedRef.current) {
setPending(false)
}
}
This is not an recommended approach! Not only does it make the code less readable and adds runtime overhead, but it might also might not work well with future features of React. It also does nothing at all about the "memory leak", the component will still live just as long as without that extra code.
The recommended way to deal with this is to either cancel the asynchronous function (with for instance the AbortController API), or to ignore it.
In fact, React dev team recognises the fact that avoiding false positives is too difficult, and has removed the warning in v18 of React.
You can try this set a state like this and check if your component mounted or not. This way you are sure that if your component is unmounted you are not trying to fetch something.
const [didMount, setDidMount] = useState(false);
useEffect(() => {
setDidMount(true);
return () => setDidMount(false);
}, [])
if(!didMount) {
return null;
}
return (
<ArtistProfileContainer>
<AlbumContainer>
{artistData ? artistData.artistAlbums.items.map(album => {
return (
<AlbumTag
image={album.images[0].url}
name={album.name}
artists={album.artists}
key={album.id}
/>
)
})
: null}
</AlbumContainer>
</ArtistProfileContainer>
)
Hope this will help you.
I had a similar issue with a scroll to top and #CalosVallejo answer solved it :) Thank you so much!!
const ScrollToTop = () => {
const [showScroll, setShowScroll] = useState();
//------------------ solution
useEffect(() => {
checkScrollTop();
return () => {
setShowScroll({}); // This worked for me
};
}, []);
//----------------- solution
const checkScrollTop = () => {
setShowScroll(true);
};
const scrollTop = () => {
window.scrollTo({ top: 0, behavior: "smooth" });
};
window.addEventListener("scroll", checkScrollTop);
return (
<React.Fragment>
<div className="back-to-top">
<h1
className="scrollTop"
onClick={scrollTop}
style={{ display: showScroll }}
>
{" "}
Back to top <span>⟶ </span>
</h1>
</div>
</React.Fragment>
);
};
I have getting same warning, This solution Worked for me ->
useEffect(() => {
const unsubscribe = fetchData(); //subscribe
return unsubscribe; //unsubscribe
}, []);
if you have more then one fetch function then
const getData = () => {
fetch1();
fetch2();
fetch3();
}
useEffect(() => {
const unsubscribe = getData(); //subscribe
return unsubscribe; //unsubscribe
}, []);
This error occurs when u perform state update on current component after navigating to other component:
for example
axios
.post(API.BASE_URI + API.LOGIN, { email: username, password: password })
.then((res) => {
if (res.status === 200) {
dispatch(login(res.data.data)); // line#5 logging user in
setSigningIn(false); // line#6 updating some state
} else {
setSigningIn(false);
ToastAndroid.show(
"Email or Password is not correct!",
ToastAndroid.LONG
);
}
})
In above case on line#5 I'm dispatching login action which in return navigates user to the dashboard and hence login screen now gets unmounted.
Now when React Native reaches as line#6 and see there is state being updated, it yells out loud that how do I do this, the login component is there no more.
Solution:
axios
.post(API.BASE_URI + API.LOGIN, { email: username, password: password })
.then((res) => {
if (res.status === 200) {
setSigningIn(false); // line#6 updating some state -- moved this line up
dispatch(login(res.data.data)); // line#5 logging user in
} else {
setSigningIn(false);
ToastAndroid.show(
"Email or Password is not correct!",
ToastAndroid.LONG
);
}
})
Just move react state update above, move line 6 up the line 5.
Now state is being updated before navigating the user away. WIN WIN
there are many answers but I thought I could demonstrate more simply how the abort works (at least how it fixed the issue for me):
useEffect(() => {
// get abortion variables
let abortController = new AbortController();
let aborted = abortController.signal.aborted; // true || false
async function fetchResults() {
let response = await fetch(`[WEBSITE LINK]`);
let data = await response.json();
aborted = abortController.signal.aborted; // before 'if' statement check again if aborted
if (aborted === false) {
// All your 'set states' inside this kind of 'if' statement
setState(data);
}
}
fetchResults();
return () => {
abortController.abort();
};
}, [])
Other Methods:
https://medium.com/wesionary-team/how-to-fix-memory-leak-issue-in-react-js-using-hook-a5ecbf9becf8
If the user navigates away, or something else causes the component to get destroyed before the async call comes back and tries to setState on it, it will cause the error. It's generally harmless if it is, indeed, a late-finish async call. There's a couple of ways to silence the error.
If you're implementing a hook like useAsync you can declare your useStates with let instead of const, and, in the destructor returned by useEffect, set the setState function(s) to a no-op function.
export function useAsync<T, F extends IUseAsyncGettor<T>>(gettor: F, ...rest: Parameters<F>): IUseAsync<T> {
let [parameters, setParameters] = useState(rest);
if (parameters !== rest && parameters.some((_, i) => parameters[i] !== rest[i]))
setParameters(rest);
const refresh: () => void = useCallback(() => {
const promise: Promise<T | void> = gettor
.apply(null, parameters)
.then(value => setTuple([value, { isLoading: false, promise, refresh, error: undefined }]))
.catch(error => setTuple([undefined, { isLoading: false, promise, refresh, error }]));
setTuple([undefined, { isLoading: true, promise, refresh, error: undefined }]);
return promise;
}, [gettor, parameters]);
useEffect(() => {
refresh();
// and for when async finishes after user navs away //////////
return () => { setTuple = setParameters = (() => undefined) }
}, [refresh]);
let [tuple, setTuple] = useState<IUseAsync<T>>([undefined, { isLoading: true, refresh, promise: Promise.resolve() }]);
return tuple;
}
That won't work well in a component, though. There, you can wrap useState in a function which tracks mounted/unmounted, and wraps the returned setState function with the if-check.
export const MyComponent = () => {
const [numPendingPromises, setNumPendingPromises] = useUnlessUnmounted(useState(0));
// ..etc.
// imported from elsewhere ////
export function useUnlessUnmounted<T>(useStateTuple: [val: T, setVal: Dispatch<SetStateAction<T>>]): [T, Dispatch<SetStateAction<T>>] {
const [val, setVal] = useStateTuple;
const [isMounted, setIsMounted] = useState(true);
useEffect(() => () => setIsMounted(false), []);
return [val, newVal => (isMounted ? setVal(newVal) : () => void 0)];
}
You could then create a useStateAsync hook to streamline a bit.
export function useStateAsync<T>(initialState: T | (() => T)): [T, Dispatch<SetStateAction<T>>] {
return useUnlessUnmounted(useState(initialState));
}
Try to add the dependencies in useEffect:
useEffect(() => {
fetchData()
return () => { props.spotifyAPI.cancelRequest() }
}, [fetchData, props.spotifyAPI])
Usually this problem occurs when you showing the component conditionally, for example:
showModal && <Modal onClose={toggleModal}/>
You can try to do some little tricks in the Modal onClose function, like
setTimeout(onClose, 0)
This works for me :')
const [state, setState] = useState({});
useEffect( async ()=>{
let data= await props.data; // data from API too
setState(users);
},[props.data]);
I had this problem in React Native iOS and fixed it by moving my setState call into a catch. See below:
Bad code (caused the error):
const signupHandler = async (email, password) => {
setLoading(true)
try {
const token = await createUser(email, password)
authContext.authenticate(token)
} catch (error) {
Alert.alert('Error', 'Could not create user.')
}
setLoading(false) // this line was OUTSIDE the catch call and triggered an error!
}
Good code (no error):
const signupHandler = async (email, password) => {
setLoading(true)
try {
const token = await createUser(email, password)
authContext.authenticate(token)
} catch (error) {
Alert.alert('Error', 'Could not create user.')
setLoading(false) // moving this line INTO the catch call resolved the error!
}
}
Similar problem with my app, I use a useEffect to fetch some data, and then update a state with that:
useEffect(() => {
const fetchUser = async() => {
const {
data: {
queryUser
},
} = await authFetch.get(`/auth/getUser?userId=${createdBy}`);
setBlogUser(queryUser);
};
fetchUser();
return () => {
setBlogUser(null);
};
}, [_id]);
This improves upon Carlos Vallejo's answer.
useEffect(() => {
let abortController = new AbortController();
// your async action is here
return () => {
abortController.abort();
}
}, []);
in the above code, I've used AbortController to unsubscribe the effect. When the a sync action is completed, then I abort the controller and unsubscribe the effect.
it work for me ....
The easy way
let fetchingFunction= async()=>{
// fetching
}
React.useEffect(() => {
fetchingFunction();
return () => {
fetchingFunction= null
}
}, [])
options={{
filterType: "checkbox"
,
textLabels: {
body: {
noMatch: isLoading ?
:
'Sorry, there is no matching data to display',
},
},
}}
I have code that looks something like:
// File1
async function fetchData() {
const data = await fetch(...);
setState({ data });
return data;
}
// File2
useEffect(() => {
(async () => {
const data = await fetchData();
setState({ data });
})();
});
This triggers 2 React commits in 1 task. This makes my app less than 60FPS. Ideally, I'd like to batch the 2 setStates. Currently, it looks like this:
Pink represents React commits (DOM operations). The browser doesn't have a chance to repaint until the second commit is done. I can give the browser a chance to repaint by adding await new Promise(succ => setTimeout(succ, 0)); between the setStates, but it'll be better if I could batch the commits.
It's also pretty much impossible to refactor this, since the useState exists in separate files.
I tried unstable_batchedUpdates but it doesn't work with async.
You can group fetchData, when fetchData is called with the same argument the cache is checked for a promise and that promise is returned instead of creating a new one (make a new fetch).
When the promise resolves then that cache entry is removed so when component mounts again it will fetch again. To change this behaviour you can pass a different cache object to the group funciton.
//group function (will always return promise)
const createGroup = (cache) => (
fn,
getKey = (...x) => JSON.stringify(x)
) => (...args) => {
const key = getKey(args);
let result = cache.get(key);
if (result) {
return result;
}
//no cache
result = Promise.resolve(fn.apply(null, args)).then(
(r) => {
cache.resolved(key); //tell cache promise is done
return r;
},
(e) => {
cache.resolve(key); //tell cache promise is done
return Promise.reject(e);
}
);
cache.set(key, result);
return result;
};
//cache that removes cache entry after resolve
const createCache = (cache = new Map()) => {
return {
get: (key) => cache.get(key),
set: (key, value) => cache.set(key, value),
//remove cache key when resolved
resolved: (key) => cache.delete(key),
//to keep cache:
//resolved: () => 'NO_OP',
};
};
//fetch data function
const fetchData = (...args) => {
console.log('fetch data called with', args);
return new Promise((resolve) =>
setTimeout(() => resolve(args), 1000)
);
};
//grouped fetch data
const groupedFetchData = createGroup(createCache())(
fetchData
);
groupedFetchData(1, 2, 3).then((resolve) =>
console.log('resolved with:', resolve)
);
groupedFetchData(1, 2, 3).then((resolve) =>
console.log('resolved with:', resolve)
);
I think you should be able to so something along the lines of this, the aim being to cache the calls for a certain amount of time and then pass them all to unstable_batchedUpdates at once.
import { unstable_batchedUpdates } from 'reactDOM'
import raf from 'raf'
const cache = []
let rafId = null
function setBatchedState(setState, data) {
cache.push({ setState, data })
if(!rafId) {
rafId = raf(() => {
unstable_batchedUpdates(() => {
cache.forEach(({setState, data}) => setState(data))
})
rafId = null
cache = []
})
}
}
export default setBatchedState
This is using requestAnimationFrame to debounce the calls to unstable_batchedUpdates, you may prefer to use setTimeout depending on your use case.
Within my React component, I have an async request which dispatches an action to my Redux store which is called within the useEffect hook:
const loadFields = async () => {
setIsLoading(true);
try {
await dispatch(fieldsActions.fetchFields(user.client.id));
} catch (error) {
setHasError(true);
}
setIsLoading(false);
}
useEffect(() => { if(isOnline) { loadFields() } }, [dispatch, isOnline]);
The action requests data via a fetch request:
export const fetchFields = clientId => {
return async dispatch => {
try {
const response = await fetch(
Api.baseUrl + clientId + '/fields',
{ headers: { 'Apiauthorization': Api.token } }
);
if (!response.ok) {
throw new Error('Something went wrong!');
}
const resData = await response.json();
dispatch({ type: SET_FIELDS, payload: resData.data });
} catch (error) {
throw error;
}
}
};
export const setFields = fields => ({
type : SET_FIELDS,
payload : fields
});
When this is rendered within the React app it results in the following warning:
Can't perform a React state update on an unmounted component. This is a no-op, but it indicates a memory leak in your application. To fix, cancel all subscriptions and asynchronous tasks in %s.%s, a useEffect cleanup function
I believe this occurs because the promise doesn't have a "clean-up" function. But I am unsure where to place this? Should I have some logic within LoadFields()? Or must this be done within the useEffect hook?
This tutorial which will help you to resolve your issue.
Quick example: with Promises
function BananaComponent() {
const [bananas, setBananas] = React.useState([])
React.useEffect(() => {
let isSubscribed = true
fetchBananas().then( bananas => {
if (isSubscribed) {
setBananas(bananas)
}
})
return () => isSubscribed = false
}, []);
return (
<ul>
{bananas.map(banana => <li>{banana}</li>)}
</ul>
)
}
Quick example: with async/await (Not the best one but that should work with an anonymous function)
function BananaComponent() {
const [bananas, setBananas] = React.useState([])
React.useEffect(() => {
let isSubscribed = true
async () => {
const bananas = await fetchBananas();
if (isSubscribed) {
setBananas(bananas)
}
})();
return () => isSubscribed = false
}, []);
return (
<ul>
{bananas.map(banana => <li>{banana}</li>)}
</ul>
)
}
First issue
If your useEffect() fetches data acynchronously then it would be a very good idea to have a cleanup function to cancel the non-completed fetch. Otherwise what could happen is like that: fetch takes longer than expected, meantime the component is re-rendered for whatever reason. Maybe because its parent is re-rendered. The cleanup of useEffect runs before re-render and the useEffect itself runs after re-render. To avoid having another fetch inflight it's better to cancel the previous one. Sample code:
const [data, setData] = useState();
useEffect(() => {
const controller = new AbortController();
const fetchData = async () => {
try {
const apiData = await fetch("https://<yourdomain>/<api-path>",
{ signal: controller.signal });
setData(apiData);
} catch (err) {
if (err.name === 'AbortError') {
console.log("Request aborted");
return;
}
}
};
fetchData();
return () => {
controller.abort();
}
});
Second issue
This code
return async dispatch => {
will not work because neither dispatch nor Redux store support async actions. The most flexible and powerful way to handle this issue is to use middleware like redux-saga. The middleware lets you:
dispatch 'usual' sync actions to Redux store.
intercept those sync actions and in response make one or several async calls doing whatever you want.
wait until async call(s) finish and in response dispatch one or several sync actions to Redux store, either the original ones which you intercepted or different ones.
I have a component which does some SQLite loads in it's componentDidMount() function
async componentDidMount() {
try {
const user = await this.userDao.getUserData();
const setupNeeded = user === null;
if( setupNeeded ) {
this.setState({
status : 'setup'
});
}
else {
this.setState({
status : 'ready',
seed: user.seed
})
}
} catch (e) {
logger.error("Error during db query", e);
this.setState({
status: 'corrupted'
});
}
}
And I would like to test the rendered result after the call to getUserData() has been resolved, and the state has been set accordingly.
Now in my test, I have the actual call to the database mocked away, so the Promise should be resolved immediately, yet testing like this does not work as expected:
Initially, I tried it like this:
test('Should render SetNewPasswordScreen', async () => {
const tree = await renderer.create(<IndexScreen/>);
const json = tree.toJSON();
// expect stuff
});
However the json in this case contains the data of the initial render() call.`
Doing it like this will work:
test('Should render SetNewPasswordScreen', (done) => {
const tree = renderer.create(<IndexScreen/>);
setTimeout(() => {
const json = tree.toJSON();
// expect stuff
}, 5000);
});
But this is not ideal, because I am just guessing that after 5 seconds everything will be done, but I don't know. Also, it's less then suitable if a test takes 5 seconds to finish. (I used 5 seconds arbitrarily, probably it will also work with much less since the async call is mocked anyway, but I can never really know)
My question is if anybody has a better idea of how to solve this issue?
it('should render setNewPassWordScreen', async () => {
const tree = await renderer.create(<IndexScreen/>);
const instance = tree.getInstance();
await instance.componentDidMount();
// expect other stuff.
});
Little late for the party but faced the issues as well. Here is a handy shortcut function I use with the adviced usage of act:
import renderer from "react-test-renderer"
import { ReactElement } from "react"
import { act } from "#testing-library/react-native"
export const expectToMatchSnapshot = async (component: ReactElement) => {
let tree
await act(async () => {
tree = renderer.create(component)
})
expect(tree.toJSON()).toMatchSnapshot()
}
In your case you should only then add:
test("should render ***", async () => {
await expectToMatchSnapshot(<IndexScreen/>)
}
you could use the wait for expect package:
https://www.npmjs.com/package/wait-for-expect
test('Should render SetNewPasswordScreen', async (done) => {
const tree = renderer.create(<IndexScreen/>);
await waitForExpect(() => {
const json = tree.toJSON();
// expect stuff
});
});
mind the function passed into the test('...', fn) is now an async function.