I'm having a regex problem when input
That's the requirement: limit 10 characters (numbers) including dots, and only 1 dot is allowed
My current code is only 10 characters before and after the dot.
^[0-9]{1,10}\.?[0-9]{0,10}$
thank for support.
You could assert 10 chars in the string being either . or a digit.
Then you can match optional digits, and optionally match a dot and again optional digits:
^(?=[.\d]{10}$)\d*(?:\.\d*)?$
The pattern matches:
^ Start of string
(?=[.\d]{10}$) Positive lookahead, assert 10 chars . or digit till the end of string
\d* Match optional digits
(?:\.\d*)? Optionally match a `. and optional digits
$ End of string
See a regex demo.
If the pattern should not end on a dot:
^(?=[.\d]{10}$)\d*(?:\.\d+)?$
Regex demo
The decimal point throws a wrench into most single pattern approaches. I would probably use an alternation here:
^(?:\d{1,10}|(?=\d*\.)(?!\d*\.\d*\.)[0-9.]{2,11})$
This pattern says to match:
^ from the start of the number
(?:
\d{1,10} a pure 1 to 10 digit integer
| OR
(?=\d*\.) assert that one dot is present
(?!\d*\.\d*\.) assert that ONLY one dot is present
[0-9.]{2,11} match a 1 to 10 digit float
)
$ end of the number
You can use a lookahead to achieve your goals.
First, looking at your regex, you've used [0-9] to represent all digit characters. We can shorten this to \d, which means the same thing.
Then, we can focus on the requirement that there be only one dot. We can test for this with the following pattern:
^\d*\.?\d*$
\d* means any number of digit characters
\.? matches one literal dot, optionally
\d* matches any number of digit characters after the dot
$ anchors this to the end of the string, so the match can't just end before the second dot, it actually has to fail if there's a second dot
Now, we don't actually want to consume all the characters involved in this match, because then we wouldn't be able to ensure that there are <=10 characters. Here's where the lookahead comes in: We can use the lookahead to ensure that our pattern above matches, but not actually perform the match. This way we verify that there is only one dot, but we haven't actually consumed any of the input characters yet. A lookahead would look like this:
^(?=\d*\.?\d*$)
Next, we can ensure that there are aren't more than 10 characters total. Since we already made sure there are only dots and digits with the above pattern, we can just match up to 10 of any characters for simplicity, like so:
^.{1,10}$
Putting these two patterns together, we get this:
^(?=\d*\.?\d*$).{1,10}$
This will only match number inputs which have 10 or fewer characters and have no more than one dot.
If you would like to ensure that, when there is a dot, there is also a digit accompanying it, we can achieve this by adding another lookahead. The only case that meets this condition is when the input string is just a dot (.), so we can just explicitly rule this case out with a negative lookahead like so:
(?!\.$)
Adding this back in to our main expression, we get:
^(?=\d*\.?\d*$)(?!\.$).{1,10}$
Related
What could I use as a regex that validates floating point numbers?
The numbers could be negative and cannot start by 0 (unless it is a real 0, or a 0 followed by decimal points such in 0.00123)
On the other hand, the regex should validate partial/uncompleted numbers. For example:
''(empty string) is valid
- is valid (it could still be a valid number with appropiate user input)
0 is valid (as 0.1 could be valid)
0.0 is valid, for the same previous reason
-0.000 is valid
-01 is not valid
.2 is not valid
I tried with this regexp:
^(-|-?0\.?[0-9]*|-?[1-9][0-9]*\.?[0-9]*|)$
It allows me to discard all non-numeric values and still allow fractional values, but how to implement the possibility that the user cannot enter numbers in the format -0232, but can enter -0.232
If I get it right, you want a regex that validates "could-be-a-future-decimal" numbers. So (empty string) -, -0, 0 and 0.... should be valid.
You may use this regex:
^-?(?:(?!0\d)\d+\.?\d*)?$
You have a demo here.
Explained:
^ # Start of string
-? # an optional minus
(?: # non-capturing group
(?!0\d) # whatever comes next, it cannot be 0 + number
\d+ # at least one number
\.? # optional dot
\d* # any quantity of numbers
)? # previous group is optional
$
Also, bear in mind that the previous thing is a regex object. So you should try to use it like this in javascript:
/myregex/
However, javascript also allows using string-based regexes (which by your comments it seems that is what you want...)
In that case you can use the new RegExp syntax. However, bear in mind that since you'll be using a string, you need to scape any characters a string should scape.
For example, you may use:
function return_some_regex_string() {
// NOTE backslashes had to be scaped since this is a string,
// not a real regex object
return '^-?(?:(?!0\\d)\\d+\\.?\\d*)?$';
}
console.log("0.123".match(new RegExp(return_some_regex_string())));
console.log("-03233".match(new RegExp(return_some_regex_string())));
console.log("333-3334".match(new RegExp(return_some_regex_string())));
But, at the same time, you could already return the regex object, which seems a simpler way to work than using string-based regexes:
function return_some_regex() {
return /^-?(?:(?!0\d)\d+\.?\d*)?$/;
}
console.log("0.123".match(return_some_regex()));
console.log("-03233".match(return_some_regex()));
console.log("333-3334".match(return_some_regex()));
You could match an optional hyphen, followed by either a floating point or match a number starting with 1-9
^-?(?:\d+\.\d+|[1-9]\d*|0\.?)$
The pattern will match
^ Start of string
-? Optional hyphen
(?: Non capture group
\d+\.\d+ Match 1+ digits, dot and 1+ digits
| Or
[1-9]\d* Match a digit 1-9 and 0+ digits 0-9
| Or
0\.? Match a zero and optional dot
) Close group
$ End of string
Regex demo
let pattern = /^-?(?:\d+\.\d+|[1-9]\d*|0\.?)$/;
["-0123",
"0123123",
"-03123123",
"1234",
"-0.234",
"0.4",
"0.3312312",
"1",
"-1234",
"0",
"0."
].forEach(s => console.log(`${s} match:${pattern.test(s)}`));
If you want to match an empty string or just a single hyphen, you can also make the second part optional.
^-?(?:\d+\.\d+|[1-9]\d*|0\.?)?$
Regex demo
I have an input that I want to apply validation to. User can type any integer (positive or negative) numbers separated with a comma. I want to
Some examples of allowed inputs:
1,2,3
-1,2,-3
3
4
22,-33
Some examples of forbidden inputs:
1,,2
--1,2,3
-1,2,--3
asdas
[]\%$1
I know a little about regex, I tried lots of ways, they're not working very well see this inline regex checker:
^[-|\d][\d,][\d]
You can use
^(?:-?[0-9]+(?:,(?!$)|$))+$
https://regex101.com/r/PAyar7/2
-? - Lead with optional -
[0-9]+ - Repeat digits
(?:,(?!$)|$)) - After the digits, match either a comma, or the end of the string. When matching a comma, make sure you're not at the end of the string with (?!$)
As per your requirements I'd use something simple like
^-?\d+(?:,-?\d+)*$
at start ^ an optional minus -? followed by \d+ one or more digits.
followed by (?:,-?\d+)* a quantified non capturing group containing a comma, followed by an optional hyphen, followed by one or more digits until $ end.
See your updated demo at regex101
Another perhaps harder to understand one which might be a bit less efficient:
^(?:(?:\B-)?\d+,?)+\b$
The quantified non capturing group contains another optional non capturing group with a hyphen preceded by a non word boundary, followed by 1 or more digits, followed by optional comma.
\b the word boundary at the $ end ensures, that the string must end with a word character (which can only be a digit here).
You can test this one here at regex101
I'm trying to write a RegExp to match only 8 digits, with one optional comma maybe hidden in-between the digits.
All of these should match:
12345678
12,45678
123456,8
Right now I have:
^[0-9,]{8}
but of course that erroneously matches 012,,,67
Example:
https://regex101.com/r/dX9aS9/1
I know optionals exist but don't understand how to keep the 8 digit length applying to the comma while also keeping the comma limited to 1.
Any tips would be appreciated, thanks!
To match 8 char string that can only contain digits and an optional comma in-between, you may use
^(?=.{8}$)\d+,?\d+$
See the regex demo
The lookahead will require the string to contain 8 chars. ,? will make matching a comma optional, and the + after \d will require at least 1 digit before and after an optional comma.
If you need to match a string that has 8 digits and an optional comma, you can use
^(?:(?=.{9}$)\d+,\d+|\d{8})$
See the regex demo
Actually, the string will have 9 characters in the string (if it has a comma), or just 8 - if there are only digits.
Explanation:
^ - start of string
(?:(?=.{9}$)\d+,\d+|\d{8}) - 2 alternatives:
(?=.{9}$)\d+,\d+ - 1+ digits followed with 1 comma followed with 1+ digits, and the whole string matched should be 9 char long (8 digits and 1 comma)
| - or
\d{8} - 8 digits
$ - end of string
See the Java code demo (note that with String#matches(), the ^ and $ anchors at the start and end of the pattern are redundant and can be omitted since the pattern is anchored by default when used with this method):
List<String> strs = Arrays.asList("0123,,678", "0123456", // bad
"01234,567", "01234567" // good
);
for (String str : strs)
System.out.println(str.matches("(?:(?=.{9}$)\\d+,\\d+|\\d{8})"));
NOTE FOR LEADING/TRAILING COMMAS:
You just need to replace + (match 1 or more occurrences) quantifiers to * (match 0 or more occurrences) in the first alternative branch to allow leading/trailing commas:
^(?:(?=.{9}$)\d*,\d*|\d{8})$
See this regex demo
You can use following regex if you want to let trailing comma:
^((\d,?){8})$
Demo
Otherwise use following one:
^((\d,?){8})(?<!,)$
Demo
(?<!,) is a negative-lookbehind.
/^(?!\d{0,6},\d{0,6},\d{0,6})(?=\d[\d,]{6}\d).{8}$/
I guess this cooperation of positive and negative look-ahead does just what's asked. If you remove the start and end delimiters and set the g flag then it will try to match the pattern along decimal strings longer than 8 characters as well.
Please try http://regexr.com/3d63m
Explanation: The negative look ahead (?!\d{0,6},\d{0,6},\d{0,6}) tries not to find any commas side by side if they have 6 or less decimal characters in between while the positive look ahead (?=\d[\d,]{6}\d) tries to find 6 decimal or comma characters in between two decimal characters. And the last .{8} selects 8 characters.
I have regular expression which is working fine for decimal .
In below expression I want to remove decimal match to validate Integer
^-?(\d*)(,\d{1,3})*(?:[,]|([.]\d{0,2}))?$
Valid Match : 1,000 & 111, & -1000,00
Invalid Match : -,1 & 1,,,,
Use
^-?(?:\d{1,3}(?:,\d{3})*|\d+)?,?$
|---1---|
|---2-----|
|-3-|
The ^ asserts the position at the start of the string and $ asserts the position at the string end. -? matches an optional -. Part 1 matches 1 to 3 digits, Part 2 matches 0+ sequences of , followed with 3 digits, part 3 is an alternative to Part 1 & 2 combined and matches just 1+ digits. The whole number pattern is optional since the (?:...|...) is quantified with ? - one or zero occurrences.
The ,? before $ allows an optional comma at the end, delete if not required (you mentioned you need to allow 100, in the comments).
See the regex demo
I'm using this regex to match some strings:
^([^\s](-)?(\d+)?(\.)?(\d+)?)$/
I'm confusing about why it's permitted to enter two dots, like ..
What I understand is that only allowed to put 1 dash or none (-)?
Any digits with no limit or none (\d+)?
One dot or none (\.)?
Why is allowed to put .. or even .4.6?
Testing done in http://www.regextester.com/
[^\s] means anything that is not a whitespace. This includes dots. Trying to match .. will get you:
[^\s] matches .
(-)? doesn't match
(\d+)? doesn't match
(\.)? matches .
(\d+)? doesn't match
I'll assume you wanted to match numbers (possibly negative/floating):
^-?\d+(\.\d+)?$
^([^\s](-)?(\d+)?(\.)?(\d+)?)$/
Assert position at the beginning of the string ^
Match the regex below and capture its match into backreference number 1 ([^\s](-)?(\d+)?(\.)?(\d+)?)
Match any single character that is NOT present in the list below and that is NOT a line break character (line feed) [^\s]
A single character from the list “\s” (case sensitive) \s
Match the regex below and capture its match into backreference number 2 (-)?
Between zero and one times, as few or as many times as needed to find the longest match in combination with the other quantifiers or alternatives ?
Match the character “-” literally -
Match the regex below and capture its match into backreference number 3 (\d+)?
Between zero and one times, as few or as many times as needed to find the longest match in combination with the other quantifiers or alternatives ?
MySQL does not support any shorthand character classes \d+
Between one and unlimited times, as few or as many times as needed to find the longest match in combination with the other quantifiers or alternatives +
Match the regex below and capture its match into backreference number 4 (\.)?
Between zero and one times, as few or as many times as needed to find the longest match in combination with the other quantifiers or alternatives ?
Match the character “.” literally \.
Match the regex below and capture its match into backreference number 5 (\d+)?
Between zero and one times, as few or as many times as needed to find the longest match in combination with the other quantifiers or alternatives ?
MySQL does not support any shorthand character classes \d+
Between one and unlimited times, as few or as many times as needed to find the longest match in combination with the other quantifiers or alternatives +
Assert position at the very end of the string $
Match the character “/” literally /
Created with RegexBuddy
As I mentioned in my comment, [^\n] is a negated character class that matches .. and as there is another (\.)? pattern, the regex can match 2 consecutive dots (since all of the parts except for [^\s] are optional).
In order not to match strings like .4.5 or .. you just need to add the . to the [^\n] negated character class:
^([^\s.](-)?(\d+)?(\.)?(\d+)?)$
^
See demo. This will not let any . in the initial capturing group.
You can use a lookahead to only disallow the first character as a dot:
^(?!\.)([^\s](-)?(\d+)?(\.)?(\d+)?)$
See another demo
All explanation is available at the online regex testers:
In order to match the numbers in the format you expect, use:
^(?:[-]?\d+\.?\d*|-)$
Human-readable explanation:
^ - start of string and then there are 2 alternatives...
[-]? - optional hyphen
\d+ - 1 or more digits
\.? - optional dot
\d* - 0 or more digits
| -OR-
- - a hyphen
$ - end of string
See demo