replace multiple words in string based on an array [duplicate] - javascript

I want to replace the smart quotes like ‘, ’, “ and ” to regular quotes. Also, I wanted to replace the ©, ® and ™. I used the following code. But it doesn't help.
Kindly help me to resolve this issue.
str.replace(/[“”]/g, '"');
str.replace(/[‘’]/g, "'");

Use:
str = str.replace(/[“”]/g, '"');
str = str.replace(/[‘’]/g, "'");
or to do it in one statement:
str = str.replace(/[“”]/g, '"').replace(/[‘’]/g,"'");
In JavaScript (as in many other languages) strings are immutable - string "replacement" methods actually just return the new string instead of modifying the string in place.
The MDN JavaScript reference entry for replace states:
Returns a new string with some or all matches of a pattern replaced by a replacement.
…
This method does not change the String object it is called on. It simply returns a new string.

replace return the resulting string
str = str.replace(/["']/, '');

The OP doesn't say why it isn't working, but there seems to be problems related to the encoding of the file. If I have an ANSI encoded file and I do:
var s = "“This is a test” ‘Another test’";
s = s.replace(/[“”]/g, '"').replace(/[‘’]/g,"'");
document.writeln(s);
I get:
"This is a test" "Another test"
I converted the encoding to UTF-8, fixed the smart quotes (which broke when I changed encoding), then converted back to ANSI and the problem went away.
Note that when I copied and pasted the double and single smart quotes off this page into my test document (ANSI encoded) and ran this code:
var s = "“This is a test” ‘Another test’";
for (var i = 0; i < s.length; i++) {
document.writeln(s.charAt(i) + '=' + s.charCodeAt(i));
}
I discovered that all the smart quotes showed up as ? = 63.
So, to the OP, determine where the smart quotes are originating and make sure they are the character codes you expect them to be. If they are not, consider changing the encoding of the source so they arrive as “ = 8220, ” = 8221, ‘ = 8216 and ’ = 8217. Use my loop to examine the source, if the smart quotes are showing up with any charCodeAt() values other than those I've listed, replace() will not work as written.

To replace all regular quotes with smart quotes, I am using a similar function. You must specify the CharCode as some different computers/browsers default settings may identify the plain characters differently ("",",',').
Using the CharCode with call the ASCII character, which will eliminate the room for error across different browsers, and operating systems. This is also helpful for bilingual use (accents, etc.).
To replace smart quotes with SINGLE QUOTES
function unSmartQuotify(n){
var name = n;
var apos = String.fromCharCode(39);
while (n.indexOf("'") > -1)
name = name.replace("'" , apos);
return name;
}
To find the other ASCII values you may need. Check here.

Related

Why the .replace() and toUppercase() did not work in the second function? [duplicate]

I want to replace the smart quotes like ‘, ’, “ and ” to regular quotes. Also, I wanted to replace the ©, ® and ™. I used the following code. But it doesn't help.
Kindly help me to resolve this issue.
str.replace(/[“”]/g, '"');
str.replace(/[‘’]/g, "'");
Use:
str = str.replace(/[“”]/g, '"');
str = str.replace(/[‘’]/g, "'");
or to do it in one statement:
str = str.replace(/[“”]/g, '"').replace(/[‘’]/g,"'");
In JavaScript (as in many other languages) strings are immutable - string "replacement" methods actually just return the new string instead of modifying the string in place.
The MDN JavaScript reference entry for replace states:
Returns a new string with some or all matches of a pattern replaced by a replacement.
…
This method does not change the String object it is called on. It simply returns a new string.
replace return the resulting string
str = str.replace(/["']/, '');
The OP doesn't say why it isn't working, but there seems to be problems related to the encoding of the file. If I have an ANSI encoded file and I do:
var s = "“This is a test” ‘Another test’";
s = s.replace(/[“”]/g, '"').replace(/[‘’]/g,"'");
document.writeln(s);
I get:
"This is a test" "Another test"
I converted the encoding to UTF-8, fixed the smart quotes (which broke when I changed encoding), then converted back to ANSI and the problem went away.
Note that when I copied and pasted the double and single smart quotes off this page into my test document (ANSI encoded) and ran this code:
var s = "“This is a test” ‘Another test’";
for (var i = 0; i < s.length; i++) {
document.writeln(s.charAt(i) + '=' + s.charCodeAt(i));
}
I discovered that all the smart quotes showed up as ? = 63.
So, to the OP, determine where the smart quotes are originating and make sure they are the character codes you expect them to be. If they are not, consider changing the encoding of the source so they arrive as “ = 8220, ” = 8221, ‘ = 8216 and ’ = 8217. Use my loop to examine the source, if the smart quotes are showing up with any charCodeAt() values other than those I've listed, replace() will not work as written.
To replace all regular quotes with smart quotes, I am using a similar function. You must specify the CharCode as some different computers/browsers default settings may identify the plain characters differently ("",",',').
Using the CharCode with call the ASCII character, which will eliminate the room for error across different browsers, and operating systems. This is also helpful for bilingual use (accents, etc.).
To replace smart quotes with SINGLE QUOTES
function unSmartQuotify(n){
var name = n;
var apos = String.fromCharCode(39);
while (n.indexOf("'") > -1)
name = name.replace("'" , apos);
return name;
}
To find the other ASCII values you may need. Check here.

What are the actual uses of ES6 Raw String Access?

What are the actual uses of String.raw Raw String Access introduced in ECMAScript 6?
// String.raw(callSite, ...substitutions)
function quux (strings, ...values) {
strings[0] === "foo\n"
strings[1] === "bar"
strings.raw[0] === "foo\\n"
strings.raw[1] === "bar"
values[0] === 42
}
quux `foo\n${ 42 }bar`
String.raw `foo\n${ 42 }bar` === "foo\\n42bar"
I went through the below docs.
http://es6-features.org/#RawStringAccess
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/template_strings
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/String/raw
http://www.2ality.com/2015/01/es6-strings.html
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dn889830(v=vs.94).aspx
The only the thing that I understand, is that it is used to get the raw string form of template strings and used for debugging the template string.
When this can be used in real time development? They were calling this a tag function. What does that mean?
What concrete use cases am I missing?
The best, and very nearly only, use case for String.raw I can think of is if you're trying to use something like Steven Levithan's XRegExp library that accepts text with significant backslashes. Using String.raw lets you write something semantically clear rather than having to think in terms of doubling your backslashes, just like you can in a regular expression literal in JavaScript itself.
For instance, suppose I'm doing maintenance on a site and I find this:
var isSingleUnicodeWord = /^\w+$/;
...which is meant to check if a string contains only "letters." Two problems: A) There are thousands of "word" characters across the realm of human language that \w doesn't recognize, because its definition is English-centric; and B) It includes _, which many (including the Unicode consortium) would argue is not a "letter."
So if we're using XRegExp on the site, since I know it supports \pL (\p for Unicode categories, and L for "letter"), I might quickly swap this in:
var isSingleUnicodeWord = XRegExp("^\pL+$"); // WRONG
Then I wonder why it didn't work, facepalm, and go back and escape that backslash, since it's being consumed by the string literal.
Easy enough in that simple regex, but in something complicated, remembering to double all those backslashes is a maintenance pain. (Just ask Java programmers trying to use Pattern.)
Enter String.raw:
let isSingleUnicodeWord = XRegExp(String.raw`^\pL+$`);
Example:
let isSingleUnicodeWord = XRegExp(String.raw`^\pL+$`); // L: Letter
console.log(isSingleUnicodeWord.test("Русский")); // true
console.log(isSingleUnicodeWord.test("日本語")); // true
console.log(isSingleUnicodeWord.test("العربية")); // true
console.log(isSingleUnicodeWord.test("foo bar")); // false
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/xregexp/3.1.1/xregexp-all.min.js"></script>
Now I just kick back and write what I mean. I don't even really have to worry about ${...} constructs used in template literals to do substitution, because the odds of my wanting to apply a quantifier {...} to the end-of-line assertion ($) are...low. So I can happily use substitutions and still not worry about backslashes. Lovely.
Having said that, though, if I were doing it a lot, I'd probably want to write a function and use a tagged template instead of String.raw itself. But it's surprisingly awkward to do correctly:
// My one-time tag function
function xrex(strings, ...values) {
let raw = strings.raw;
let max = Math.max(raw.length, values.length);
let result = "";
for (let i = 0; i < max; ++i) {
if (i < raw.length) {
result += raw[i];
}
if (i < values.length) {
result += values[i];
}
}
console.log("Creating with:", result);
return XRegExp(result);
}
// Using it, with a couple of substitutions to prove to myself they work
let category = "L"; // L: Letter
let maybeEol = "$";
let isSingleUnicodeWord = xrex`^\p${category}+${maybeEol}`;
console.log(isSingleUnicodeWord.test("Русский")); // true
console.log(isSingleUnicodeWord.test("日本語")); // true
console.log(isSingleUnicodeWord.test("العربية")); // true
console.log(isSingleUnicodeWord.test("foo bar")); // false
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/xregexp/3.1.1/xregexp-all.min.js"></script>
Maybe the hassle is worth it if you're using it in lots of places, but for a couple of quick ones, String.raw is the simpler option.
First, a few things:
Template strings is old name for template literals.
A tag is a function.
String.raw is a method.
String.raw `foo\n${ 42 }bar\` is a tagged template literal.
Template literals are basically fancy strings.
Template literals can interpolate.
Template literals can be multi-line without using \.
String.raw is required to escape the escape character \.
Try putting a string that contains a new-line character \n through a function that consumes newline character.
console.log("This\nis\nawesome"); // "This\nis\nawesome"
console.log(String.raw`This\nis\nawesome`); // "This\\nis\\nawesome"
If you are wondering, console.log is not one of them. But alert is. Try running these through http://learnharmony.org/ .
alert("This\nis\nawesome");
alert(String.raw`This\nis\nawesome`);
But wait, that's not the use of String.raw.
Possible uses of String.raw method:
To show string without interpretation of backslashed characters (\n, \t) etc.
To show code for the output. (As in example below)
To be used in regex without escaping \.
To print windows director/sub-directory locations without using \\ to much. (They use \ remember. Also, lol)
Here we can show output and code for it in single alert window:
alert("I printed This\nis\nawesome with " + Sring.raw`This\nis\nawesome`);
Though, it would have been great if It's main use could have been to get back the original string. Like:
var original = String.raw`This is awesome.`;
where original would have become: This\tis \tawesome.. This isn't the case sadly.
References:
http://exploringjs.com/es6/ch_template-literals.html
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/String/raw
Template strings can be useful in many situations which I will explain below. Considering this, the String.raw prevents escapes from being interpreted. This can be useful in any template string in which you want to contain the escape character but do not want to escape it. A simple example could be the following:
var templateWithBackslash = String.raw `someRegExp displayed in template /^\//`
There are a few things inside that are nice to note with template strings.
They can contain unescaped line breaks without problems.
They can contain "${}". Inside these curly braces the javascript is interpreted instead.
(Note: running these will output the result to your console [in browser dev tools])
Example using line breaks:
var myTemplate = `
<div class="myClass">
<pre>
My formatted text
with multiple lines
{
asdf: "and some pretty printed json"
}
</pre>
</div>
`
console.log(myTemplate)
If you wanted to do the above with a normal string in Javascript it would look like the following:
var myTemplate = "\
<div class="myClass">\
<pre>\
My formatted text\
with multiple lines\
{\
asdf: "and some pretty printed json"\
}\
</pre>\
</div>"
console.log(myTemplate)
You will notice the first probably looks much nicer (no need to escape line breaks).
For the second I will use the same template string but also insert the some pretty printed JSON.
var jsonObj = {asdf: "and some pretty printed json", deeper: {someDeep: "Some Deep Var"}}
var myTemplate = `
<div class="myClass">
<pre>
My formatted text
with multiple lines
${JSON.stringify(jsonObj, null, 2)}
</pre>
</div>
`
console.log(myTemplate)
In NodeJS it is extremely handy when it comes to filepath handling:
var fs=require('fs');
var s = String.raw`C:\Users\<username>\AppData\Roaming\SomeApp\someObject.json`;
var username = "bob"
s=s.replace("<username>",username)
fs.readFile(s,function(err,result){
if (err) throw error;
console.log(JSON.parse(result))
})
It improves readability of filepaths on Windows. \ is also a fairly common separator, so I can definitely see why it would be useful in general. However it is pretty stupid how \ still escapes `... So ultimately:
String.raw`C:\Users\` //#==> C:\Users\`
console.log(String.raw`C:\Users\`) //#==> SyntaxError: Unexpected end of input.
In addition to its use as a tag, String.raw is also useful in implementing new tag functions as a tool to do the interleaving that most people do with a weird loop. For example, compare:
function foo(strs, ...xs) {
let result = strs[0];
for (let i = 0; i < xs.length; ++i) {
result += useFoo(xs[i]) + strs[i + 1];
}
return result;
}
with
function foo(strs, ...xs) {
return String.raw({raw: strs}, ...xs.map(useFoo));
}
The Use
(Requisite knowledge: tstring §.)
Instead of:
console.log(`\\a\\b\\c\\n\\z\\x12\\xa9\\u1234\\u00A9\\u{1234}\\u{00A9}`);
.you can:
console.log(String.raw`\a\b\c\n\z\x12\xa9\u1234\u00A9\u{1234}\u{00A9}`);
"Escaping"
<\\u> is fine, yet <\u> needs "escaping", eg:
console.log(String.raw`abc${'\\u'}abc`);
.Dit <\\x>, <\x>,
<console.log(String.raw`abc${`\\x`}abc`)>;
.<\`>, <`>, <console.log(String.raw`abc${`\``}abc`)>;
.<\${>, <${&>, <console.log(String.raw`abc${`$\{`}abc`)>;
.<\\1> (till <\\7>), <\1>, <console.log(String.raw`abc${`\\1`}abc`)>;
.<\\>, endunit <\>, <console.log(String.raw`abc${`\\`}`)>.
Nb
There's also a new "latex" string. Cf §.
I've found it to be useful for testing
my RegExps. Say I have a RegExp which
should match end-of-line comments because
I want to remove them. BUT, it must not
match source-code for a regexp like /// .
If your code contains /// it is not the
start of an EOL comment but a RegExp, as
per the rules of JavaScript syntax.
I can test whether my RegExp in variable patEOLC
matches or doesn't /// with:
String.raw`/\//` .match (patEOLC)
In other words it is a way to let my
code "see" code the way it exists in
source-code, not the way it exists
in memory after it has been read
into memory from source-code, with
all backslashes removed.
It is a way to "escape escaping" but
without having to do it separately
for every backslash in a string, but
for all of them at the same time.
It is a way to say that in a given
(back-quoted) string backslash
shall behave just like any other
character, it has no special
meaning or interpretation.

How to ignore escape characters in javascript?

I have the following string:
var str = '\x27';
I have no control on it, so I cannot write it as '\\x27' for example. Whenever I print it, i get:
'
since 27 is the apostrophe. When I call .length on it, it gives me 1. This is of course correct, but how can I treat it like a not escaped string and have it print literally
\x27
and give me a length of 4?
I'm not sure if you should do what you are trying to do, but this is how it works:
var s = '\x27';
var sEncoded = '\\x' + s.charCodeAt(0).toString(16);
s is a string that contains one character, the apostrophe. The character code as a hexadecimal number is 27.
After the assignment var str = '\x27';, you can't tell where the contents of str came from. There's no way to find out whether a string literal was assigned, or whether the string literal contained an escape sequence. All you have is a string containing a single apostrophe character (Unicode code point U+0027). The original assignment could have been
var str = '\x27'; // or
var str = "'"; // or
var str = String.fromCodePoint(3 * 13);
There's simply no way to tell.
That said, your question looks like an XY problem. Why are you trying to print \x27 in the first place?

Splitting string with javascript using '>' character

I acknowledge that this question has probably been asked so many times before and I have tried searching all over StackOverflow for a solution, but so far nothing has worked for me.
I want to split a string but it's not working properly and spitting out individual characters as each item in an array. The string I have from my CMS uses ">" characters to separate and I am using regEx to replace the 'greater than' symbol - with a comma, which works. Sourced this solution from Regex that detects greater than ">" and less than "<" in a string
However, the arrays remain incorrectly formed, like the split() function does not even work:
var myString = "TEST Public Libraries Connect > News Blog > A new item"
var regEx = /<|>/g;
var myNewString = (myString.replace(regEx,","))
alert(myNewString);
myNewString.split(",");
alert(myNewString[0]);
alert(myNewString[1]);
alert(myNewString[2]);
I've put it up in a Fiddle as well, just confused as to why the split won't work properly. Is it because there is spaces in the string?
This should work:
var myNewString = myString.split(">");
https://jsfiddle.net/2j56cva0/3/
In your fiddle, you were splitting myNewString instead of the actual string.
myNewString.split(",");
You need to assign the result of the split to something. It does not just change the string itself into an array.
var parts = myNewString.split(",");

jquery .replace(/./g, "") do not work for me but others

I found this snippet somewhere and it works like a charm:
var n = parseInt(e.find("span.favNum").text().replace(/./g, "")) + 1;
If I do it in a similar way it doesn't work anymore.
I do the following:
<div id ="test">6.987</div>
var test = $("#test");
var r = test.text().replace(/./g, "");
console.log("wrong ", r);
I know that I can replace it also like this:
var r = test.text().replace(".", "");
This works.
I would like to understand why the "stolen" snippet is working.
Any idea?
http://jsfiddle.net/nJZMf/3/
The original script is found here: http://wp-svbtle.themeskult.com/
You will find the snippet by viewing the source of index.html and searching for .replace.
You need to escape the "."
test.text().replace(/\./g, "");
The reason that the code in the page you linked to works, where yours doesn't, is that it's not the same regular expression. Here's what I found in that page (and similar code in several places)
r = n.text().replace( /,/g, "" )
where r is a jQuery object.
Note that the regular expression has a , inside the //, not a . like the code you had trouble with.
Comma is not a special character in regular expressions, so it needs no special treatment. Period has a special meaning. As the other answers pointed out, it matches all characters, and you need to prefix it with \ if you want to match . only.
Also note that .replace() is not jQuery code, it's JavaScript.
jQuery's .text() method returns a JavaScript String value. So anything you do with that string - such as the .replace() call - is actually a JavaScript String method.
The distinction is important when you want to research a problem: a search for "javascript string replace" will get you better information than "jquery replace".
It has to be var r = test.text().replace(/\./g, ""); instead of var r = test.text().replace(/./g, ""); because you need to escape the . in order for it to be replaced.
http://jsfiddle.net/mrk1989/nJZMf/4/
Solution because I add \ in var r = test.text().replace(/\./g, "");
The problem was that you did not escape dot.
But keep in mind that:
.replace(".", "");
.replace(/\./g, "");
are two different things.
For example: https://jsfiddle.net/rmhpkz9n/1/

Categories

Resources