Webpack unexpected token react native - javascript

I'm trying to integrate a connection to Ledger nano X devices, into a native Swift package. Unfortunately Ledger only provide an SDK as a ReactNative module. I dislike ReactNative and really don't want to integrate it into my entire Swift package, and force it onto my users, just for this one library.
I've had limited success in the past converting NodeModules into plain .js files that I can run directly with iOS's JavascriptContext. I've used webpack to bundle it up into a single plain js file (no require, import, export etc keywords). Adding a native Swift wrapper around that lets me keep all the messy dev setup and tools out of my project and just leverage the plain JS when needed for small use-cases. I've very little experience with this and what i've done in the past isn't working, hours of googling hasn't gotten me any closer.
Building the entire Ledgerjs with webpack was throwing up errors, since I only need pieces of it I started trying to get one of the sub-packages #ledgerhq/react-native-hw-transport-ble to build. I forked the project and added this webpack.config.js
const webpack = require('webpack');
const path = require('path');
module.exports = {
entry: {
"ledger_transport_ble": ['./src/awaitsBleOn.ts', './src/BleTransport.ts', './src/monitorCharacteristic.ts', './src/remapErrors.ts', './src/timer.ts', './src/types.ts']
},
mode: 'production',
module: {
rules: [
{
test: /\.ts$/,
use: 'ts-loader',
exclude: /node_modules/
},
{
test: /\.(js|jsx)$/,
use: 'babel-loader',
exclude: /node_modules/
}
]
},
devtool: 'source-map',
resolve: {
extensions: ['.tsx', '.ts', '.js', '.jsx'],
modules: ['node_modules'],
fallback: {
"stream": require.resolve("stream-browserify")
}
},
output: {
filename: '[name].js',
path: path.resolve(__dirname, 'dist'),
library: ['[name]'],
libraryTarget: "var"
},
plugins: [
new webpack.ProvidePlugin({ Buffer: ['buffer', 'Buffer'] })
],
};
with this .babelrc
{
"presets": [
"#babel/preset-env",
"#babel/preset-react",
"#babel/preset-flow"
]
}
and I get back this error:
ERROR in ./node_modules/react-native-ble-plx/index.js 11:7
Module parse failed: Unexpected token (11:7)
You may need an appropriate loader to handle this file type, currently no loaders are configured to process this file. See https://webpack.js.org/concepts#loaders
| export { State, LogLevel, ConnectionPriority, ScanCallbackType, ScanMode } from './src/TypeDefinition'
|
> export type {
| Subscription,
| DeviceId,
# ./src/BleTransport.ts 87:29-60
Instructions online where to add the .babelrc file that I added above, but it made no difference. Have I missed a step somewhere? Or is there something else I should be doing?

Related

Importing a Javascript with Raw-Loader and alias with Webpack

I have a TypeScript project (Project A) which uses Webpack to create a bundle with target node.
This application needs to consume a Javascript file which is the output bundle of another project (Project B). This project emits, always via Webpack, a Javascript library for the browser with target web.
However, Project A needs to import this Javascript file raw, just as a string. It needs the content of the file, it does not need to access its types and functions.
Project structure
The webpack.config.js in Project A is as follows>
const path = require("path");
module.exports = {
target: "node",
module: {
rules: [
{
test: /\.tsx?$/,
use: "ts-loader",
exclude: /node_modules/,
},
{
test: /\.js$/,
use: "raw-loader",
},
],
},
resolve: {
alias: {
Jsfile$: path.resolve(__dirname, "../projb/dist/bundle.js"),
},
extensions: [".ts", ".js", "..."],
},
output: {
filename: "bundle.js",
path: path.resolve(__dirname, "dist"),
library: {
name: "bundle",
type: "umd",
},
globalObject: "this",
},
};
Project B build script instructs Webpack to create a bundle with target web to be placed inside projb/dist/bundle.js.
As you can see, I try to use the raw-loader in Project A and I use an alias.
The problem
The file I have in Project A which is trying to import the JS file is:
import jsfile from "Jsfile";
But it is not working, giving me error:
ERROR in C:\Users\myuser\Documents\myproj\proja\src\file_importer.ts
./src/file_importer.ts 3:24-34
[tsl] ERROR in C:\Users\myuser\Documents\myproj\proja\src\file_importer.ts(3,25)
TS2307: Cannot find module 'Jsfile' or its corresponding type declarations.
What am I doing wrong?

Are typescript project references necessary if transpiling with babel? (Electron project with Webpack)

I am still in the process of setting up my project configuration so I don't have any errors to work with right now, but if I am understanding the Typescript docs correctly...
It seems like Project references TypeScript Docs - Project references are not that necessary if transpiling with babel-loader in webpack. (I'm working in VSCode)
I am trying to convert an Electron app to TypeScript and currently reorganizing the folder structure so I have minimal issues.
I am trying to understand if I am on the right track and if I can avoid including "references" and instead just use "extends" to get the functionality I want.🤔
Here is my project structure ignoring all files that are not tsconfig files:
./tsconfig.json
./tsconfig-base.json
./main/tsconfig.json
./src/client/tsconfig.json
./__tests__
./__tests__/__client__/tsconfig.json
./__tests__/__main__/tsconfig.json
In this structure ./tsconfig.json would really just be for references like the example on Microsoft's Github
Electron Main Process and related files are in ./main. The tsconfig here will set "module":"commonjs" for working in node. I think it will also extend from the ./tsconfig-base.json
Electron Renderer Process and my React-Redux app files are in ./src/client. The tsconfig here sets "module":"es2015" or "module":"ESNEXT" for working with es modules. I think it will also extend from the ./tsconfig-base.json
The ./__tests__/__client__/tsconfig.json and ./__tests__/__main__/tsconfig.json would just be duplicates of the non tests folder versions similarly extending from the base config in ./
Webpack config is already set up to handle creating separate bundles for main and renderer processes so that the entire app can be in TypeScript. Is there any reason I should be using "references" in my files in the main or client folders?
Sample snippets of the Webpack config before I switch the tnry files to be .ts files (dev):
const rendererInclude = path.resolve(__dirname, "src");
const mainInclude = path.resolve(__dirname, "main");
Main Process:
module.exports = [
{
mode: "development",
entry: path.join(__dirname, "main", "swell.js"),
output: {
path: path.join(__dirname, "dist"),
filename: "main-bundle.js",
},
target: "electron-main",
node: {
__dirname: false,
__filename: false,
},
resolve: {
extensions: [".ts", ".tsx", ".js", ".json"],
},
module: {
rules: [
{
test: /\.(ts|js)x?$/,
loader: "babel-loader",
include: mainInclude,
exclude: /node_modules/,
}
] } ... },
continued to Renderer Process:
{
mode: "development",
entry: path.join(__dirname, "src", "index.js"),
output: {
path: path.join(__dirname, "dist"),
filename: "renderer-bundle.js",
},
target: "electron-renderer",
resolve: {
extensions: [".ts", ".tsx", ".js", ".json"],
},
module: {
rules: [
{
test: /\.(ts|js)x?$/,
loader: "babel-loader",
include: rendererInclude,
exclude: /node_modules/,
]} ...} ]
Project Reference will help you solve some problems in case where your test projects import src/main modules.
This is what Project Reference solves:
There’s no built-in up-to-date checking, so you end up always running tsc twice
Invoking tsc twice incurs more startup time overhead
tsc -w can’t run on multiple config files at once
read more about Project References

BabelJS is processing the wrong files when working with Webpack 4

I started from a configuration consisting of both webpack 3 and a similarly old babel version. It can be found in the following repo:
https://github.com/konradmi/react-loadable-ssr-code-splitting
I updated both webpack and babel to their latest versions, as well as all the node modules, and migrated the old configuration accordingly. This issue could stem from any of these.
Once I finished migrating, I noticed all the babel plugins traverse my webpack configs files (which are in a separate nested folder) instead of the actual js source files which are properly processed by webpack. (I verified it by doing some logging inside of the babel plugins).
The result is the same regardless of whether I'm using .babelrc or not.
The webpack config files used to be at the root of the project as you can see in the repo I linked to above, and now they are inside of a nested "config" folder.
At first I thought it might be the cause of this issue, so I tried the following:
Using path.resolve() in the entry point in order to use an absolute path to make sure it wouldn't possibly be re-interpreted by babel from a string relative to who knows where.
Putting the webpack config files back in the root of the project and building from that path.
In all the variations I've tried - webpack always does its job perfectly, while babel is traversing the wrong files. I'm not even sure how it's possible, babel-loader should be traversing the files which it got from the previous webpack rule, which emitted the correct files.
Here's my current Webpack 4 config files concatenated into 1 file and stripped of irrelevant rules and plugins for your convenience:
const webpack = require('webpack')
const path = require('path')
const webpackNodeExternals = require('webpack-node-externals')
module.exports = {
name: 'server',
target: 'node',
externals: [webpackNodeExternals()],
entry: './src/server.tsx',
output: {
filename: 'bundle.js',
chunkFilename: '[name].js',
path: path.resolve(__dirname, '../build')
},
mode: 'development',
stats: 'verbose',
resolve: {
extensions: ['.ts', '.tsx', '.js', '.jsx']
},
module: {
rules: [
{
test: /\.jsx?$/,
exclude: /node_modules/,
use: [
{
loader: 'babel-loader',
options: {
babelrc: false,
presets: [
[
'#babel/env',
{
'targets': {
'browsers': ['last 2 versions']
},
'debug': false
}
],
'#babel/preset-react'
],
plugins: [
'#babel/plugin-syntax-dynamic-import',
'#babel/plugin-proposal-class-properties',
'#babel/plugin-transform-object-assign',
'react-loadable/babel'
]
}
}
]
},
{
test: /\.tsx?$/,
exclude: /node_modules/,
use: [
{
loader: 'ts-loader'
}
]
}
]
}
}
I was importing webpack in my server source code, the files babel was going over were webpack imports which I added there in the source code. It couldn't find anything else other than those imports because due to previous rules webpack was exporting a bundle with evals containing the processed code (dev mode settings). The babel plugin wasn't looking for eval statements, so the only thing I could see was the processing of webpack related imports.

webpack bundle size vs requirejs bundle size

I'm trying to migrate a requireJS based app to webpack.
This app doesn't have many dependencies - actually it only needs a promise polyfill - and I've already figured out how to make webpack using the minified one.
The bundle size with requireJS used to be 43KB, when using webpack it's 121KB.
While 121KB isn't really huge it is a notable size increase.
From running webpack --display-reasons --display-modules I have learned that there seems to be some node_module dependencies included in my bundle. Way more than I expected.
I see things like buffer, readable-stream, stream-http, stream-browserify, core-util-is, buffer-shims, ...
Is this expected / part of the webpack wrapper code?
Is there anything I can do to exclude these dependencies?
This is my webpack.config.js:
var webpack = require('webpack');
module.exports = {
entry: {
"mynexuz": "./js/mynexuz-api.js",
"kws": "./js/kws-api.js",
"main": "./js/main.js",
"quest": "./js/quest.js"
},
output: {
filename: "./dist/[name]-bundle.js",
},
plugins: [
new webpack.optimize.UglifyJsPlugin({
compress: {
warnings: false
}
}),
new webpack.DefinePlugin({
'process.env': {
'NODE_ENV': JSON.stringify('production'),
}
})
],
node: {
//stream: false,
//process: false,
//global: false
},
// Enable sourcemaps for debugging webpack's output.
devtool: "source-map",
resolve: {
modules: ['js', 'js/lib', 'node_modules'],
// Add '.ts' and '.tsx' as resolvable extensions.
extensions: [".webpack.js", ".web.js", ".ts", ".tsx", ".js"]
},
module: {
loaders: [
// All output '.js' files will have any sourcemaps re-processed by 'source-map-loader'.
{
test: /\.js$/,
loader: "source-map-loader",
exclude: /node_modules/
},
// All files with a '.ts' or '.tsx' extension will be handled by 'awesome-typescript-loader'.
{
test: /\.tsx?$/,
loader: "awesome-typescript-loader",
exclude: /node_modules/
}
]
},
};
This doesn't work for all libraries you are using, but when possible you can save on file size by only importing the actual function/component you need to use.
Here is an example with lodash
import has from 'lodash/has';
That way above will ONLY import the has method.
However if you do either of the following:
import { has } from 'lodash';
Or
import _ from 'lodash';
Then you will import ALL of the lodash library which will bump up your file size.
However with other libraries (i.e. current version of moment.js) it's not so simple to import just the PART of the library you need.
There are a few other ways to try to solve this problem (i.e. tweaking your webpack settings) but I would start with this method.
After looking deeper into the issue I've found the reason for the large size of the bundle. In true requireJS style I had:
define(['http', 'config'], function (Http, Config) { ... });
This 'http' thing was supposed to refer to my own library, but webpack resolved this to some NPM module, bringing in all the aforementioned dependencies.
I've now changed the code to:
define(['./http', 'config'], function (Http, Config) { ... });
And the bundle sizes are back to around 44KB.

Webpack exclude entries for CommonsChunkPlugin

I am trying to set up webpack production configuration. All looks well. However, I realized that while using the commons chunk plugin, it covers all the files in common as expected. What I want to do is, separation of common library modules and common application modules. My config file is :
module.exports = {
entry: {
lib: ["react", "react-dom"],
app: "./ui-v2/app/app.js",
app2: "./ui-v2/app/app2.js"
},
output: {
path: path.join(__dirname, "target/ui/v2"),
filename: "/app/[name].[chunkhash].min.js"
},
module: {
loaders: [
{
test: /\.js$/,
exclude: /node_modules/,
loader: "babel-loader"
},
{
test: /\.(png|jpg|svg)/,
loader: "file-loader?name=img/[name].[hash].[ext]"
// loaders: ["url", "image-webpack"]
},
{
test: /\.scss$/,
loader: ExtractTextPlugin.extract("style-loader", "css-loader!autoprefixer-loader!sass-loader", {
publicPath: __dirname
})
},
{
test: /\.(woff|woff2|ttf|eot)$/,
loader: "file-loader?name=fonts/[name].[hash].[ext]"
}
]
},
plugins: [
clean,
new webpack.optimize.CommonsChunkPlugin("common", "app/common.[chunkhash].js"),
new webpack.ProvidePlugin({
React: "react",
ReactDOM: "react-dom",
$: "jquery",
_: "lodash"
}),
new webpack.optimize.UglifyJsPlugin({
compress: {
warnings: false
sourceMap: true
},
mangle: {
except: ["exports", "import", "$", "_", "require", "React", "ReactDOM"]
}
}),
new ExtractTextPlugin("styles/[name].[contenthash].css"),
new Manifest()
]
}
Basically I have 3 modules in the app; app.js, app2.js and a common component user.js.
What I want to achieve is to bundle all library related files like react, react-dom, lodash, etc in a lib bundle, and common application components like user.js in a common bundle. In order to do this, I thought there might be an option to exclude the files that I don't want them to go to "common" file. If I use this output, what is the point for long term caching files for library bundles because whenever I get a common component in my project, they will go into the common bundle and the content hash will be different, but nothing changes in this library files like react, jquery, lodash, etc.
Anyway, what I have at the end of build process is everything still goes into the common bundle and lib has nothing and the file sizes are :
app.<hash>.min.js -> 3.05KB
app2.<hash>.min.js -> 3.05KB
lib.<hash>.min.js -> 165 Bytes (has almost nothing!)
common.<hash>.js -> 678 KB
Is there any way to achieve what I want or what would be the best approach to a production build in similar cases? Thank you!
Its because the first parameter for CommonsChunkPlugin is "common" where it should be "lib". The plugin picks up the entry with a name matching with the value of its first parameter.
A simple example config picked from webpack's wiki -
var webpack = require("webpack");
module.exports = {
entry: {
app: "./app.js",
vendor: ["jquery", "underscore", ...],
},
output: {
filename: "bundle.js"
},
plugins: [
new webpack.optimize.CommonsChunkPlugin(/* chunkName= */"vendor", /* filename= */"vendor.bundle.js")
]
};
Note that the "vendor" entry is again specified in CommonsChunkPlugin
You should check out Webpack's DLL Plugin.
https://github.com/webpack/webpack/blob/cb3d8e2097503c7245c5dda5b7a6e9d63421a72b/examples/dll/README.md
With this plugin you bundle up common 3rd party vendor dependencies such as React and friends in a DLL, which is essentially just a JSON Manifest that goes along with your requires wrapped in webpack context and cached to disk.
In your project code, you would have your shared components which depend on React and friends, and you would have your application code which depend on your shared components as well as react and friends.
Your project would incorporate the DLL Reference plugin as you can see here:
https://github.com/webpack/webpack/blob/cb3d8e2097503c7245c5dda5b7a6e9d63421a72b/examples/dll-user/README.md
This will see to it that your shared components and your application code pull React and other 3rd party modules from the same DLL bundle. This can help improve build times and the performance of the dev server and hot module reloading.

Categories

Resources