Related
let pppp = {
name: "duanxiao",
age: 1,
job: {
title: "~~~"
}
};
let ppppCopy = {};
({
name: ppppCopy.name,
age: ppppCopy.age,
job: ppppCopy.job
} = pppp);
pppp.job.title = "Hacker";
console.log(pppp);
console.log(ppppCopy);
The output values are the same.
Why modifying the value of one object, the other object will also be modified?
Whenever I modify the value of one object, the value of the other object is also modified.
Because you pppp and ppppCopy holds the same reference of job property. Changing at one location will impact another. You can achieve your intended outcome with below code using ES6 spread operator,
let pppp = {
name: "duanxiao",
age: 1,
job: {
title: "~~~"
}
};
const ppppCopy = {
...pppp,
job: { ...pppp.job },
};
With this, updating pppp.job.title will not impact ppppCopy.job.title.
You can also use the traditional way like JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(pppp)), but you need to be more cautious while using this approach as it strips down the function property
In JS, and many other languages, you have data types that store by value, like Number and other primitive types. Some data types stored by reference, like Arrays, Object.
By destructing pppp you just passing the reference to the inner job object, and not duplicating it, so technically its the same job object in pppp and ppppCopy.
Here I added a manipulation to a primitive, and you can see that there is a difference.
let pppp = {
name: "duanxiao",
age: 1,
job: {
title: "~~~"
}
};
let ppppCopy = {};
({
name: ppppCopy.name,
age: ppppCopy.age,
job: ppppCopy.job
} = pppp);
pppp.job.title = "Hacker";
pppp.age = 123;
console.log(pppp);
console.log(ppppCopy);
Here is another good answer related
The only way is to use JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(pppp));
name: "duanxiao",
age: 1,
job: {
title: "~~~"
}
};
let ppppCopy = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(pppp));
pppp.job.title = "Hacker";
console.log(pppp);
console.log(ppppCopy);
Since objects are non-primitive data types javascript makes a reference of the original object when you make a copy using the assignment operator as you have done in your case. In order to avoid shallow copying you can use the spread operator i.e. let copy = { ...original} or you can use the assign method i.e. let copy = Object.assign({}, original) but both of these fail when you have a nested object. In order to deep copy a nested object you need to do it as Edoardo pointed out above but that will fail too when there is a function in your object. Ravindra's method can also be used, but it will be a hassle when you have multiple nested objects.
The best way to do it in my opinion is to use lodash _.cloneDeep() method. You can read more about it here
This question already has answers here:
How to determine equality for two JavaScript objects?
(82 answers)
Closed 2 years ago.
I have a javascript object on my DB, its personal data, this is the structure:
const storedUserData = {
name: "John",
sirname:"Doe",
phone: "666-666-66666",
streetName: "Fake Street",
streetNumber: "123",
zipCode: "90125"
}
and I have a separate object, which has the same structure, which basically is on the front end, and its the result of reading form data.
const formData = {
name: "John",
sirname:"Doe",
phone: "666-666-66666",
streetName: "Fake Street",
streetNumber: "123",
zipCode: "90125"
}
Basically, when the user clicks submit I want to check if there are differences between the stored object storedUserData, above, and the new object, formData. If there are differences, save the differences to the DB.
Of course, I could go on like this for each property, since there are few:
if(storedUserData.name !== formData.name) {
pushDataToDb()
}
but its the lazy approach, and I want to do it correctly. I've been reading into object keys, but I cant figure it out. How could I successfully loop between each property of both items comparing them, and then only if there is a change between the two properties I would push to DB.
Thank you.
You could use a loop as you mentioned above,
function isEquivalent(a, b) {
// Create arrays of property names
var aProps = Object.getOwnPropertyNames(a);
var bProps = Object.getOwnPropertyNames(b);
// If number of properties is different,
// objects are not equivalent
if (aProps.length != bProps.length) {
return false;
}
for (var i = 0; i < aProps.length; i++) {
var propName = aProps[i];
// If values of same property are not equal,
// objects are not equivalent
if (a[propName] !== b[propName]) {
return false;
}
}
// If we made it this far, objects
// are considered equivalent
return true;
}
Read more about it here
i am not getting proper the return after insertgraph in objection.js
i am getting the result like :
[
User {
name: 'Santosh Devi',
city: 'Suratgarh',
number: '9898987458',
userroles: UserRoles { role_id: 2, user_id: 37 },
id: 37
}
]
where i want the result like :
[
{
name: 'Santosh Devi',
city: 'Suratgarh',
number: '9898987458',
userroles: { role_id: 2, user_id: 37 },
id: 37
}
]
There are few ways to get rid of the specific class references:
1. JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(result))
This will rebuild the object by first converting the whole object to a string (in JSON format), and then by doing the reverse -- creating a new object from a string. As this string format (JSON) does not store custom class information, it achieves your purpose. However, if your object has functions, symbols, then these will be omitted. Also Map and Set will become empty objects. For a more complete list of restrictions. See JSON.stringify
2. Deep Clone
There are several deep-clone functions out there, that may or may not do what you expect. Some will still try to maintain the original prototype references, so that it would not benefit you. You can find some here: How to Deep clone in javascript. For your case, this one would do the job:
function deepClone(obj, hash = new WeakMap()) {
if (Object(obj) !== obj) return obj; // primitives
if (hash.has(obj)) return hash.get(obj); // cyclic reference
const result = Array.isArray(obj) ? [] : {};
hash.set(obj, result);
return Object.assign(result, ...Object.keys(obj).map(
key => ({ [key]: deepClone(obj[key], hash) }) ));
}
You call it as newResult = deepClone(result).
The advantage here, is that it supports cyclic references, which JSON.stringify cannot handle. Also, there is no string conversion happening, which really is not necessary. You can extend this function to keep deal with some class instances that you like to stay that way. See how you can support Date, RegExp, Map, Set, ... in this answer. But don't do the "catch-all" line.
3. Change the prototype
With this strategy you mutate the result in-place.
function removeClasses(obj, hash = new WeakSet()) {
if (Object(obj) !== obj) return; // primitives
if (hash.has(obj)) return; // cyclic reference
hash.add(obj);
if (Array.isArray(obj)) Object.setPrototypeOf(obj, Array.prototype);
else Object.setPrototypeOf(obj, Object.prototype);
for (let value of Object.values(obj)) {
removeClasses(value, hash);
}
}
Call it as removeClasses(result), and afterwards result will have been "fixed". Again, this method does not use a conversion to string. As it does not create a new object either, it consumes less memory. But on the other hand you mutate an object, and some would advise against that.
I get from the server a list of objects
[{name:'test01', age:10},{name:'test02', age:20},{name:'test03', age:30}]
I load them into html controls for the user to edit.
Then there is a button to bulk save the entire list back to the database.
Instead of sending the whole list I only want to send the subset of objects that were changed.
It can be any number of items in the array. I want to do something similar to frameworks like Angular that mark an object property like "pristine" when no change has been done to it. Then use that flag to only post to the server the items that are not "pristine", the ones that were modified.
Here is a function down below that will return an array/object of changed objects when supplied with an old array/object of objects and a new array of objects:
// intended to compare objects of identical shape; ideally static.
//
// any top-level key with a primitive value which exists in `previous` but not
// in `current` returns `undefined` while vice versa yields a diff.
//
// in general, the input type determines the output type. that is if `previous`
// and `current` are objects then an object is returned. if arrays then an array
// is returned, etc.
const getChanges = (previous, current) => {
if (isPrimitive(previous) && isPrimitive(current)) {
if (previous === current) {
return "";
}
return current;
}
if (isObject(previous) && isObject(current)) {
const diff = getChanges(Object.entries(previous), Object.entries(current));
return diff.reduce((merged, [key, value]) => {
return {
...merged,
[key]: value
}
}, {});
}
const changes = [];
if (JSON.stringify(previous) === JSON.stringify(current)) {
return changes;
}
for (let i = 0; i < current.length; i++) {
const item = current[i];
if (JSON.stringify(item) !== JSON.stringify(previous[i])) {
changes.push(item);
}
}
return changes;
};
For Example:
const arr1 = [1, 2, 3, 4]
const arr2 = [4, 4, 2, 4]
console.log(getChanges(arr1, arr2)) // [4,4,2]
const obj1 = {
foo: "bar",
baz: [
1, 2, 3
],
qux: {
hello: "world"
},
bingo: "name-o",
}
const obj2 = {
foo: "barx",
baz: [
1, 2, 3, 4
],
qux: {
hello: null
},
bingo: "name-o",
}
console.log(getChanges(obj1.foo, obj2.foo)) // barx
console.log(getChanges(obj1.bingo, obj2.bingo)) // ""
console.log(getChanges(obj1.baz, obj2.baz)) // [4]
console.log(getChanges(obj1, obj2)) // {foo:'barx',baz:[1,2,3,4],qux:{hello:null}}
const obj3 = [{ name: 'test01', age: 10 }, { name: 'test02', age: 20 }, { name: 'test03', age: 30 }]
const obj4 = [{ name: 'test01', age: 10 }, { name: 'test02', age: 20 }, { name: 'test03', age: 20 }]
console.log(getChanges(obj3, obj4)) // [{name:'test03', age:20}]
Utility functions used:
// not required for this example but aid readability of the main function
const typeOf = o => Object.prototype.toString.call(o);
const isObject = o => o !== null && !Array.isArray(o) && typeOf(o).split(" ")[1].slice(0, -1) === "Object";
const isPrimitive = o => {
switch (typeof o) {
case "object": {
return false;
}
case "function": {
return false;
}
default: {
return true;
}
}
};
You would simply have to export the full list of edited values client side, compare it with the old list, and then send the list of changes off to the server.
Hope this helps!
Here are a few ideas.
Use a framework. You spoke of Angular.
Use Proxies, though Internet Explorer has no support for it.
Instead of using classic properties, maybe use Object.defineProperty's set/get to achieve some kind of change tracking.
Use getter/setting functions to store data instead of properties: getName() and setName() for example. Though this the older way of doing what defineProperty now does.
Whenever you bind your data to your form elements, set a special property that indicates if the property has changed. Something like __hasChanged. Set to true if any property on the object changes.
The old school bruteforce way: keep your original list of data that came from the server, deep copy it into another list, bind your form controls to the new list, then when the user clicks submit, compare the objects in the original list to the objects in the new list, plucking out the changed ones as you go. Probably the easiest, but not necessarily the cleanest.
A different take on #6: Attach a special property to each object that always returns the original version of the object:
var myData = [{name: "Larry", age: 47}];
var dataWithCopyOfSelf = myData.map(function(data) {
Object.assign({}, data, { original: data });
});
// now bind your form to dataWithCopyOfSelf.
Of course, this solution assumes a few things: (1) that your objects are flat and simple since Object.assign() doesn't deep copy, (2) that your original data set will never be changed, and (3) that nothing ever touches the contents of original.
There are a multitude of solutions out there.
With ES6 we can use Proxy
to accomplish this task: intercept an Object write, and mark it as dirty.
Proxy allows to create a handler Object that can trap, manipulate, and than forward changes to the original target Object, basically allowing to reconfigure its behavior.
The trap we're going to adopt to intercept Object writes is the handler set().
At this point we can add a non-enumerable property flag like i.e: _isDirty using Object.defineProperty() to mark our Object as modified, dirty.
When using traps (in our case the handler's set()) no changes are applied nor reflected to the Objects, therefore we need to forward the argument values to the target Object using Reflect.set().
Finally, to retrieve the modified objects, filter() the Array with our proxy Objects in search of those having its own Property "_isDirty".
// From server:
const dataOrg = [
{id:1, name:'a', age:10},
{id:2, name:'b', age:20},
{id:3, name:'c', age:30}
];
// Mirror data from server to observable Proxies:
const data = dataOrg.map(ob => new Proxy(ob, {
set() {
Object.defineProperty(ob, "_isDirty", {value: true}); // Flag
return Reflect.set(...arguments); // Forward trapped args to ob
}
}));
// From now on, use proxied data. Let's change some values:
data[0].name = "Lorem";
data[0].age = 42;
data[2].age = 31;
// Collect modified data
const dataMod = data.filter(ob => ob.hasOwnProperty("_isDirty"));
// Test what we're about to send back to server:
console.log(JSON.stringify(dataMod, null, 2));
Without using .defineProperty()
If for some reason you don't feel comfortable into tapping into the original object adding extra properties as flags, you could instead populate immediately
the dataMod (array with modified Objects) with references:
const dataOrg = [
{id:1, name:'a', age:10},
{id:2, name:'b', age:20},
{id:3, name:'c', age:30}
];
// Prepare array to hold references to the modified Objects
const dataMod = [];
const data = dataOrg.map(ob => new Proxy(ob, {
set() {
if (dataMod.indexOf(ob) < 0) dataMod.push(ob); // Push reference
return Reflect.set(...arguments);
}
}));
data[0].name = "Lorem";
data[0].age = 42;
data[2].age = 31;
console.log(JSON.stringify(dataMod, null, 2));
Can I Use - Proxy (IE)
Proxy - handler.set()
Global Objects - Reflect
Reflect.set()
Object.defineProperty()
Object.hasOwnProperty()
Without having to get fancy with prototype properties you could simply store them in another array whenever your form control element detects a change
Something along the lines of:
var modified = [];
data.forEach(function(item){
var domNode = // whatever you use to match data to form control element
domNode.addEventListener('input',function(){
if(modified.indexOf(item) === -1){
modified.push(item);
}
});
});
Then send the modified array to server when it's time to save
Why not use Ember.js observable properties ? You can use the Ember.observer function to get and set changes in your data.
Ember.Object.extend({
valueObserver: Ember.observer('value', function(sender, key, value, rev) {
// Executes whenever the "value" property changes
// See the addObserver method for more information about the callback arguments
})
});
The Ember.object actually does a lot of heavy lifting for you.
Once you define your object, add an observer like so:
object.addObserver('propertyKey', targetObject, targetAction)
My idea is to sort object keys and convert object to be string to compare:
// use this function to sort keys, and save key=>value in an array
function objectSerilize(obj) {
let keys = Object.keys(obj)
let results = []
keys.sort((a, b) => a > b ? -1 : a < b ? 1 : 0)
keys.forEach(key => {
let value = obj[key]
if (typeof value === 'object') {
value = objectSerilize(value)
}
results.push({
key,
value,
})
})
return results
}
// use this function to compare
function compareObject(a, b) {
let aStr = JSON.stringify(objectSerilize(a))
let bStr = JSON.stringify(objectSerilize(b))
return aStr === bStr
}
This is what I think up.
It would be cleanest, I’d think to have the object emit an event when a property is added or removed or modified.
A simplistic implementation could involve an array with the object keys; whenever a setter or heck the constructor returns this, it first calls a static function returning a promise; resolving: map with changed values in the array: things added, things removed, or neither. So one could get(‘changed’) or so forth; returning an array.
Similarly every setter can emit an event with arguments for initial value and new value.
Assuming classes are used, you could easily have a static method in a parent generic class that can be called through its constructor and so really you could simplify most of this by passing the object either to itself, or to the parent through super(checkMeProperty).
I have this Javascript object.
req.session
In my code I add properties to this object. These properties can be other objects, arrays, or just plain strings.
req.session.savedDoc = someObject;
req.session.errors = ['someThing', 'anotherThing', 'thirdThing'];
req.session.message = 'someString'
If I later would like to erase all added properties of this object, what is the easiest/best way?
There must be a better way than this?
// Delete all session values
delete req.session.savedDoc;
delete req.session.errors;
delete req.session.message;
#VisioN's answer works if you want to clear that specific reference, but if you actually want to clear an object I found that this works:
for (var variableKey in vartoClear){
if (vartoClear.hasOwnProperty(variableKey)){
delete vartoClear[variableKey];
}
}
There are two possible solutions to the problem:
Assign an empty object
req.session = {};
The garbage collector will clean the memory automatically. This variant is super fast and will work in most cases, however, you need to use it with caution, as it may keep the references to the objects in memory. This caveat is described in the TLDR section below.
Delete properties one-by-one
Object.keys(object).forEach(key => delete object[key]);
This will clean the object by going through every non-prototype property and deleting it. It's safer but slower. You need to decide if it makes sense for you to use it in a particular case.
TLDR
Any solution given above will do the job for the author in the current situation, as well as any other valid solution provided in this question. It mainly depends on the way how the developer wants to manipulate the deprecated data.
Session object may contain data that is linked by different variable, and setting a new empty object to req.session will not break the reference to the old data, so the old data will be available where it is still required. Although the correct way to keep old data is to clone the initial object, real-life scenarios can be different. Let's look at the following example:
req.session.user = { name: "Alexander" }; // we store an object in the session
var session = req.session; // save reference to the session in a variable
console.log( req.session, session ); // {user: Object}, {user: Object}
req.session = {}; // let's replace session with a new object
console.log( req.session, session ); // {}, {user: Object}
We still can fetch old data from session variable but req.session is empty: here setting a new object works as a sort of alternative to deep cloning. The garbage collector will not remove data from the old req.session object as it is still referenced by the session variable.
Deep cleaning of the object with:
Object.keys(object).forEach(key => delete object[key]);
... will explicitly remove all values from the req.session object and, since session variable is linked to the same object, session will become empty as well. Let's see how it works:
req.session.user = { name: "Alexander" }; // we store an object in the session
var session = req.session; // save reference to the session in a variable
console.log( req.session, session ); // {user: Object}, {user: Object}
Object.keys(req.session).forEach(key => delete req.session[key]);
console.log( req.session, session ); // {}, {}
As you can see now, in both cases we get empty objects.
From speed and memory perspectives setting a new empty object will be much faster than cleaning the old object property by property, however memory-wise if the old data is still referenced somewhere, the new object approach won't free up memory that old data is consuming.
It's quite obvious that choosing the approach to take is mostly up to your coding scenario but in most cases req.session = {}; will do the job: it is fast and short. However, if you keep references to the original object in other variables, you may consider using deep implicit object properties deletion.
I can see only one correct solution for removing own properties from object:
for (var x in objectToClean) if (objectToClean.hasOwnProperty(x)) delete objectToClean[x];
If you want to use it more than once, you should create a cleaning function:
function deleteProperties(objectToClean) {
for (var x in objectToClean) if (objectToClean.hasOwnProperty(x)) delete objectToClean[x];
}
For your case the usage would be:
deleteProperties(req.session);
This solution removes properties from the object wherever it's referenced and keeping the old reference.
Example:
Using empty object assignment:
var x = {a: 5};
var y = x;
x = {}; // x will be empty but y is still {a: 5}, also now reference is gone: x !== y
Using cleaning method:
var x = {a: 5};
var y = x;
deleteProperties(x); // x and y are both empty and x === y
If you want to delete all properties without touching methods you can use :
for(var k in req.session) if(!req.session[k].constructor.toString().match(/^function Function\(/)) delete req.session[k];
You can use a map instead if you care about performance like so
const map = new Map()
map.set("first", 1)
map.set("second", 1)
map.clear()
This is a O(1) operation, so even if you have a huge object you do not need to iterate x times to delete the entries.
I've done it like this
var
i,
keys = Object.keys(obj);
for(i = 0; i < keys.length; i++){
delete obj[keys[i]];
}
You could add it to Object (prototype's not ideal here) - will be static.
Object.defineproperties(Object, {
'clear': function(target){
var
i,
keys = Object.keys(target);
for(i = 0; i < keys.length; i++){
delete target[keys[i]];
}
}
});
Then you can clear random objects with
Object.clear(yourObj);
yourObj = {} replaces the reference to a new object, the above removes it's properties - reference is the same.
The naive object = {} method is okay for vanilla Object, but it deletes prototypes of custom objects.
This method produces an empty object that preserves prototypes, using Object.getPrototypeOf() and Object.create():
emptyObj = Object.create(Object.getPrototypeOf(obj), {});
Example:
class Custom extends Object {
custom() {}
}
let custom = new Custom();
custom.foo = "bar";
console.log(custom.constructor.name, custom);
// Custom {"foo": "bar"}
// naive method:
let objVanilla = {}
console.log(objVanilla.constructor.name, objVanilla);
// Object {}
// safe method:
objSafe = Object.create(Object.getPrototypeOf(custom), {});
console.log(objSafe.constructor.name, objSafe);
// Custom {}
This script removes property recursively except for the data reported in vector.
You need the lodash library
-- Function:
function removeKeysExcept(object, keysExcept = [], isFirstLevel = true) {
let arrayKeysExcept = [],
arrayNextKeysExcept = {};
_.forEach(keysExcept, (value, i) => {
let j = value.split('.');
let keyExcept = j[0];
arrayKeysExcept.push(keyExcept);
j.shift();
if (j.length) {
j = j.join('.');
if (!arrayNextKeysExcept[keyExcept]) {
arrayNextKeysExcept[keyExcept] = [];
}
arrayNextKeysExcept[keyExcept].push(j);
}
})
_.forEach(arrayNextKeysExcept, (value, key) => {
removeKeysExcept(object[key], value, false);
});
if (isFirstLevel) {
return;
}
Object.keys(object).forEach(function (key) {
if (arrayKeysExcept.indexOf(key) == -1) {
delete object[key];
}
});
}
Run so:
-- Removes all properties except the first level and reported in the vector:
removeKeysExcept(obj, ['department.id','user.id']);
-- Removes all properties
removeKeysExcept(obj, ['department.id','user.id'], false);
-- Example:
let obj = {
a: {
aa: 1,
ab: {
aba: 21
}
},
b: 10,
c: {
ca: 100,
cb: 200
}
};
removeKeysExcept(obj, ['a.ab.aba','c.ca']);
/*OUTPUT: {
a: {
ab: {
aba: 21
}
},
b: 10,
c: {
ca: 100,
}
};*/
removeKeysExcept(obj, ['a.ab.aba','c.ca'], false); //Remove too firt level
/*OUTPUT: {
a: {
ab: {
aba: 21
}
},
c: {
ca: 100,
}
};*/
removeKeysExcept(obj);
/*OUTPUT: {b:10};*/
removeKeysExcept(obj, [], false); //Remove too firt level
/*OUTPUT: {};*/