Redux action doesn't dispatch after page refresh - javascript

I have an issue with redux and probably useEffect(I am not sure where my mistake is). I am trying to get information from PokeAPI and store information in the redux state. The problem is that the information about pokemons don't include pokemon types(fire, water, etc.), to solve this I am sending requests to fetch those types from a different endpoint and I want to include these types of specific pokemon to redux state.
1-redux state without types of pokemons
2-redux state with types of pokemons
My goal is to have a state like in the second picture with types. But when I refresh the page, I only acquire the first picture(actions aren't dispatching). When I change something in my code and save it, I get types as well. I suspect that my problem is in the useEffect, but I couldn't find a solution without creating some nasty loops.
Note: Page parameter in fetchData coming from PokeAPI, it basically returns 15 pokemon for every page.(For now I am just experimenting on the first page)
This is my first question in stackoverflow, I already searched for similar questions but those were dealing with different aspects, so I decided to ask myself.
PokemonList.js --> this is where I need those types
import React, { useEffect } from 'react';
import { ListGroup, ListGroupItem } from "react-bootstrap";
import { useDispatch, useSelector } from 'react-redux';
import _ from "lodash";
import { GetPokemonList, GetSpecificPokemon } from '../redux/actions/PokemonAction';
import { Button } from 'react-bootstrap';
const PokemonList = () => {
const dispatch = useDispatch();
const pokemonList = useSelector(state => state.PokemonList);
useEffect(() => {
const fetchData = (page = 1) => {
dispatch(GetPokemonList(page));
}
fetchData();
}, [dispatch]);
useEffect(() => {
const fetchTypes = () => {
pokemonList.data.forEach(pokemon => {
dispatch(GetSpecificPokemon(pokemon.name));
});
}
fetchTypes();
}, [dispatch]);
const showData = () => {
if (!_.isEmpty(pokemonList.data)) {
return (
<div className="pokemon-list-wrapper">
{pokemonList.data.map((pokemon, index) => {
return (
<div className="pokemon-list-element" key={index}>
<ListGroup>
<ListGroupItem action href={`/pokemon/${pokemon.name}`} variant="success">{pokemon.name}
<Button style={{ float: "right" }}>Test</Button>
</ListGroupItem>
</ListGroup>
</div>
)
})}
</div>
)
}
if (pokemonList.loading) {
return <p>Loading...</p>
}
if (pokemonList.errorMessage !== "") {
return <p>{pokemonList.errorMessage}</p>
}
};
return (
<div>
{showData()}
</div>
)
};
export default PokemonList;
PokemonAction.js
import axios from "axios"
export const GetPokemonList = (page) => async (dispatch) => {
try {
dispatch({
type: "POKEMON_LIST_LOADING"
});
const perPage = 15;
const offset = (page * perPage) - perPage;
const res = await axios.get(`https://pokeapi.co/api/v2/pokemon?limit=${perPage}&offset=${offset}`);
dispatch({
type: "POKEMON_LIST_SUCCESS",
payload: res.data
});
} catch (e) {
dispatch({
type: "POKEMON_LIST_FAIL"
});
}
}
export const GetSpecificPokemon = (name) => async (dispatch) => {
try {
const res = await axios.get(`https://pokeapi.co/api/v2/pokemon/${name}`);
dispatch({
type: "SPECIFIC_POKEMON_SUCCESS",
payload: res.data
});
} catch (e) {
dispatch({
type: "SPECIFIC_POKEMON_FAIL"
});
}
}
PokemonListReducer.js
const initialState = {
data: [],
loading: false,
errorMessage: "",
count: 0
};
const PokemonListReducer = (state = initialState, action) => {
switch (action.type) {
case "POKEMON_LIST_LOADING":
return {
...state,
loading: true,
errorMessage: ""
};
case "POKEMON_LIST_FAIL":
return {
...state,
loading: false,
errorMessage: "unable to get pokemon"
};
case "POKEMON_LIST_SUCCESS":
return {
...state,
loading: false,
data: action.payload.results,
errorMessage: "",
count: action.payload.count
};
case "SPECIFIC_POKEMON_SUCCESS":
const typesMap = action.payload.types.map((type) => {
return type.type.name;
})
return {
...state,
data: state.data.map((pokemon) => pokemon.name === action.payload.name
? {...pokemon, types: typesMap}
: pokemon
),
loading: false,
errorMessage: ""
}
case "SPECIFIC_POKEMON_FAIL":
return {
...state,
loading: false,
errorMessage: "unable to get pokemon"
};
default:
return state
}
}
export default PokemonListReducer;

This is happening because your second useEffect does not wait for your first useEffect to finish and because of that the pokemon list is empty. On code change, since the state already has the pokemon list pre-filled, the second useEffect finds the list and does it's thing. You have to guarantee that the second action is caller right after the first one in order for this to work properly. One way to do this is to dispatch the GetSpecificPokemon action for each pokemon before finishing the GetPokemonList action. Something like this should work:
export const GetPokemonList = (page) => async (dispatch) => {
try {
dispatch({
type: "POKEMON_LIST_LOADING"
});
const perPage = 15;
const offset = (page * perPage) - perPage;
const res = await axios.get(`https://pokeapi.co/api/v2/pokemon?limit=${perPage}&offset=${offset}`);
dispatch({
type: "POKEMON_LIST_SUCCESS",
payload: res.data
});
res.data.result.forEach(pokemon => {
dispatch(GetSpecificPokemon(pokemon.name));
});
} catch (e) {
dispatch({
type: "POKEMON_LIST_FAIL"
});
}
}
Note that you won't be needing the second useEffect if you are doing this. You might also have to change displaying/not displaying the loader part yourself.
Another way is to add pokemonList as the second object in the useEffect's array parameter. I haven't tested it yet but this should work. For example:
useEffect(() => {
const fetchTypes = () => {
pokemonList.data.forEach(pokemon => {
dispatch(GetSpecificPokemon(pokemon.name));
});
}
fetchTypes();
}, [dispatch, pokemonList]);
This will call the useEffect whenever there is a change in pokemonList. In your implementation, useEffect is only called once since the value of dispatch never really changes after that. Adding pokemonList to the array results in the useEffect being called when there is a change in pokemonList also. Use this approach if you want the GetPokemonList action to always be separate from GetSpecificPokemon action i.e there are cases when both are not called together. If both are always called together then the first approach is cleaner.
That being said, these implementations actually result in a lot of network calls. The best way is to avoid the second call if possible (change your UI accordingly?) since you do not have any control over the API. If you do have control over the API you could include the extra data in the first request's response.
Edit: Here is the batch logic
const p = pokemonList.map(({ name }) =>
axios.get(`https://pokeapi.co/api/v2/pokemon/${name}`)
);
const res = await Promise.all(p);
const data = res.map((r) => ({
...r.data,
types: r.data.types.map((type) => type.type.name) // the logic you were using for types
}));
dispatch({
type: "SPECIFIC_POKEMON_SUCCESS",
payload: data
});
And then update the state in the reducer like
case "SPECIFIC_POKEMON_SUCCESS":
return {
...state,
data: action.payload,
loading: false,
errorMessage: ""
};

Related

how to check if the current item is available in the cart list in reactjs

I am working on a reactjs ecommerce app for that I need to check in productDetail Page is the product is already available in cart page. Both of the components have different api endpoint. I am not sure how to do that. I am using react-redux for state management.
CartActions.js
export const getItemsAddedToCart = () => dispatch => {
dispatch({
type: cartActionTypes.GET_CART_LOAD
});
new _rest()
.get(URLConstants.urls.GET_ALL_ITEMS_IN_CART)
.then(response => {
dispatch({
type: cartActionTypes.GET_CART_SUCCESS,
payload: response.data
});
})
.catch(err => {
dispatch({
type: cartActionTypes.GET_CART_ERROR,
error: err
});
});
};
export const IsItemInCart = (pId) => ({
type: cartActionTypes.CHECK_ITEM_IN_CART,
pId
});
These are my actions inside productDetails page i am passing product id inside IsItemIncart. Then In reducer I am trying to look into cart ans update state.
CartReducer.js
const initialState = {
loading: false,
loaded: false,
error: null,
itemsInCart: null,
pagination: null,
totalamount: 0,
checkedItems: [],
paymentStatus: "NIL_TRANSACTION",
order: {
addressId: "NIL",
paymentType: "NIL"
},
isItemInCart: false,
bulkOrderData: []
};
export default function (state = initialState, action) {
switch (action.type) {
case cartActionTypes.GET_CART_LOAD:
return {
...state,
loading: false
};
case cartActionTypes.GET_CART_SUCCESS:
return {
...state,
loaded: true,
loading: false,
totalItemInCart: action.payload._embedded.cartResourceList.length,
itemsInCart: action.payload._embedded.cartResourceList,
totalamount: action.payload._embedded.cartResourceList.reduce(
(acc, item) => {
return item.totalAmount + acc;
},
0
),
pagination: action.payload.page
};
case cartActionTypes.CHECK_ITEM_IN_CART:
const findItem = state.itemsInCart.findIndex(
productId => productId === action.pid
);
return {
...state,
isItemInCart: true,
/*
* Check For Item In Cart Here
* */
};
Here is My reducer I want to check them here which i am not sure how to do that.
In CartAction.js
export const IsItemInCart = (productId) => {
return (dispatch, getState) => {
// you can use your cart reducer name instead of cartData
const cartData = getState().cartData;
// match your productId with your products in cart
const product = cartData.find((singleProductInCart) => {return singleProductInCart.productId === productId});
// then proceed further depending on you get product or not
}
}
Actions in redux are meant to transform the state as you've done with getItemsAddedToCart. IsItemInCart is not how you should use actions as checking whether a particular item is in the cart is a derived property that can be calculated outside the store (in the component or otherwise) like below:
import React from 'react';
import { connect } from 'react-redux';
import { getItemsAddedToCart } from './CartActions';
// these will get mapped to the components props
// using the connect function from react-redux
const mapDispatchToProps = (dispatch) => ({
fetchCartItems: () => dispatch(getItemsAddedToCart())
})
const mapStateToProps = (state, props) => ({
cartList: state.cart.itemsInCart,
});
class ExampleComponent extends React.Component {
constructor(props) {
super(props);
// if has not been fetched yet
if (!this.props.cartList) {
this.props.fetchCartItems();
}
}
checkItemInCart(pID) {
return this.props.cartList.find(
(product) => product.id === pID);
}
....
....
}
export default connect(mapStateToProps, mapDispatchToProps)(ExampleComponent);
Read usage with react.

Async redux action to fetch data is causing component to reload and cause react to react max depth in reload

I am trying to create a component that allows detecting changes in the redux store. Once the shouldUpdateData flag is set in the store, the component responsible for updating should fetch the data by using an async action creator. In my case, either the error "Maximum updates have reached" occurs or the update never happens.
Depending on the dispatch function stopFetching() (turns off the shouldUpdateData flag), the error or outcome changes. If I do the dispatch inside the action creator there are endless updates. If the code is used as it is below, no update occurs.
The reason I used the useSelector() hook from 'react-redux' is to detect a change in the store for the loading attribute.
Thank you in advance.
Here is the action creator:
export function updateDataAsync(id) {
return function (dispatch) {
// dispatch(fetchDataRequest());
return fetch(`/api/user/${id}/data`, {
method: "GET",
headers: {
'Accept': 'application/json',
'Content-Type': 'application/json'
}
})
.then(res => res.json())
.then(
(result) => {
let {projects, notes} = result;
// New data and dispatch function
dispatch(fetchDataSuccess({projects, notes}));
},
(error) => { dispatch(fetchDataFailure(error)) }
)
}
}
Here is the reducer for this action creator:
export function savedData(state = DATA_INITIAL_STATE, action) {
switch(action.type) {
case FETCH_STATES.FETCH_DATA_REQUEST:
return {
...state,
loading: true
}
case FETCH_STATES.FETCH_DATA_SUCCESS:
return {
loading: false,
data: action.data,
error: ''
}
case FETCH_STATES.FETCH_DATA_FAILURE:
return {
loading: false,
data: {},
error: action.error.message
}
default:
return state;
}
}
The React component that is doing the update:
function StoreUpdater({ update, userId, shouldUpdate, startFetch, stopFetch, children }) {
const loading = useSelector(state => state.savedData.loading);
let reqSent = useRef(false);
useEffect(()=>{
if(!reqSent && shouldUpdate) {
startFetch();
update(userId)
reqSent.context = true;
}
})
return loading ? <LoadingAnimation /> : children;
}
const mapStateToProps = (state) => {
return {
userId: state.user.id,
shouldUpdate: state.shouldUpdateData // The flag that should trigger the update
}
}
const mapDispatchToProps = (dispatch) => {
return {
stopFetch: () => { dispatch(setShouldFetchData(false)) },
update: (id) => { dispatch(updateDataAsync(id)) },
startFetch: () => dispatch(fetchDataRequest()),
}
}
export default connect(mapStateToProps, mapDispatchToProps)(StoreUpdater);
You dint pass any dependency to useEffect so it will be called on every render which is causing infinite renders
change useEffect to
useEffect(()=>{
if(!reqSent && shouldUpdate) {
startFetch();
update(userId)
reqSent.context = true;
}
},[])
For complete information regarding useEffect refer this link
The reference I created inside the component responsible of the updates, was causing the problem. The reference was preventing the update dispatch to occur due to the if statement being false.
mapStateToProps and mapDispatchToProps were react-redux higher order functions to connect classes components into the store. there equalants at functional components are useSelector and useDispatch. re-write your HOC redux adaption into hooks, and add [ dependency ] at useEffect usage
function StoreUpdater({ update, userId, shouldUpdate, startFetch, stopFetch, children }) {
const loading = useSelector(state => state.savedData.loading);
const userId = useSelector(state => state.user.id);
const shouldUpdate = useSelector(state => state.shouldUpdateData);
let reqSent = useRef(false);
const dispatch = useDispatch() // import from 'react-redux'
useEffect(()=>{
if(!reqSent && shouldUpdate) {
dispatch(startFetch());
dispatch(update(userId));
reqSent.context = true;
}
}, [reqSent, shouldUpdate, startFetch, dispatch, update, userId])
return loading ? <LoadingAnimation /> : children;
}
export default StoreUpdater ;

Access the state of my redux app using redux hooks

I am migrating my component from a class component to a functional component using hooks. I need to access the states with useSelector by triggering an action when the state mounts. Below is what I have thus far. What am I doing wrong? Also when I log users to the console I get the whole initial state ie { isUpdated: false, users: {}}; instead of just users
reducers.js
const initialState = {
isUpdated: false,
users: {},
};
const generateUsersObject = array => array.reduce((obj, item) => {
const { id } = item;
obj[id] = item;
return obj;
}, {});
export default (state = { ...initialState }, action) => {
switch (action.type) {
case UPDATE_USERS_LIST: {
return {
...state,
users: generateUsersObject(dataSource),
};
}
//...
default:
return state;
}
};
action.js
export const updateUsersList = () => ({
type: UPDATE_USERS_LIST,
});
the component hooks I am using
const users = useSelector(state => state.users);
const isUpdated = useSelector(state => state.isUpdated);
const dispatch = useDispatch();
useEffect(() => {
const { updateUsersList } = actions;
dispatch(updateUsersList());
}, []);
first, it will be easier to help if the index/store etc will be copied as well. (did u used thunk?)
second, your action miss "dispatch" magic word -
export const updateUsersList = () =>
return (dispatch, getState) => dispatch({
type: UPDATE_USERS_LIST
});
it is highly suggested to wrap this code with { try } syntax and be able to catch an error if happened
third, and it might help with the console.log(users) error -
there is no need in { ... } at the reducer,
state = intialState
should be enough. this line it is just for the first run of the store.
and I don't understand where { dataSource } comes from.

Awaiting Redux Action w/ React Hooks

I'm trying to handle a form submission to show a loading component when the data fetch is occuring. I'd like to display the data when it's been loaded into my Redux store.
Right now, I've set up my component to use React hooks. While the data loads into my redux store successfully, I'm not sure how to "await" the result of the action being completed. Here's a simplified version of what my component looks like:
const DataPage = (props) => {
const [isLoading, setIsLoading] = useState(false);
const [isError, setError] = useState(false);
useEffect(() => { // Reset Filters when dataSource changes...
setError(false);
setIsLoading(false);
}, [dataSource]);
const handleSubmit = (e, { dataSource }) => {
e.preventDefault();
setError(false)
setIsLoading(true);
//// IDEALLY THIS IS WHERE THE FIX WOULD GO? TURN THIS INTO ASYNC/AWAIT?
props.fetchData({ dataSource, token: localStorage.JWT_TOKEN });
};
return (
<div className="dataPage">
<form className="dataPage__filters" onSubmit={(e) => handleSubmit(e, { dataSource })}>
<DataSelector dataSource={dataSource} setDataSource={setDataSource}/>
<button className="button">
Search
</button>
</form>
{isError && <div>Something went wrong...</div>}
{ isLoading ? ( <div>...Loading </div> ) : (
<div className="dataPage__table">
<DataTable /> // This is connected to my redux-store separately through 'connect'
</div>
)}
</div>
);
};
const mapDispatchToProps = (dispatch) => ({
fetchData: ({ dataSource, token }) => dispatch(startFetchData({ dataSource, token }))
});
export default connect(null, mapDispatchToProps)(DataPage);
The relevant actions (startFetchData, and setData) are located in another file, and look like this:
export const setData = (data) => ({
type: "SET_DATA",
data
});
export const startFetchData = ({ dataSource, filter, filterTarget, token }) => {
return (dispatch) => {
axios.get(`${'http://localhost:8081'}/api/${dataSource}`, { headers: { authorization: token }})
.then((res) => {
dispatch(setData(result));
});
}
};
I'd like to be able to do this without introducing any new dependencies if possible.
A note for those using TypeScript: If you want to await a promise returned by an action using useDispatch() you may see TypeScript complaining about an unnecessary await.
In this case make sure to add the correct typing (see ThunkDispatch) to useDispatch via generics.
Also with useEffect() with async-await syntax make sure to wrap your async code in another closure because useEffect() expects a void return value and Typescript otherwise complains about you returning a Promise.
const dispatch = useDispatch<ThunkDispatch<any, any, Action>>();
useEffect(() => {
(async () => {
const myResult = await dispatch(...);
const anotherResult = await dispatch(...);
// ...
})();
});
I recommend you to use redux-thunk middleware. It's really easy and useful library to able your action to be, instead of objects, functions (including async functions). I'll give you an example:
Store.js
import { createStore, applyMiddleware } from 'redux';
import thunk from 'redux-thunk';
import rootReducer from './reducers/index';
import api from './services/api';
// Note: this API requires redux#>=3.1.0
const store = createStore(
rootReducer,
// With extra argument, in this case, my API):
applyMiddleware(thunk.withExtraArgument(api));
);
AuthDuck.js
Giving this duck (types, actions and reducers in the same file, see more here)
// ----------------------------------------------------------------
// Types
// ----------------------------------------------------------------
const Types = {
SIGN_IN_START: 'SIGN_IN_START',
SIGN_IN_SUCCESS: 'SIGN_IN_SUCCESS',
SIGN_IN_FAIL: 'SIGN_IN_FAIL'
};
// ----------------------------------------------------------------
// Actions
// ----------------------------------------------------------------
const signin = function (user) {
// LOOK HERE!
// Redux Thunk able you to return a function instead of an object.
return async function (dispatch, getState, api) {
try {
dispatch({ type: Types.SIGN_IN_START });
const token = await api.access.signin(user);
dispatch({ type: Types.SIGN_IN_SUCCESS, payload: token });
} catch (error) {
dispatch({ type: Types.SIGN_IN_FAIL, payload: error });
}
};
};
export const Actions = { signin };
// ----------------------------------------------------------------
// Reducers
// ----------------------------------------------------------------
export default function reducer(state, action) {
switch (action.type) {
case VeasyCalendarTypes.SIGN_IN_START:
return { ...state, isLoading: true };
case VeasyCalendarTypes.SIGN_IN_SUCCESS:
return { ...state, isLoading: false, token: action.payload };
case VeasyCalendarTypes.SIGN_IN_FAIL:
return { ...state, isLoading: false, error: action.payload };
default:
return state;
}
};
I hope to helped you, let me know if it worked for your case :)
Best regards

Unable to read state updated by useReducer hook in context provider

I am using useReducer hook to manage my state, but it seems like I have a problem with reading updated state in my context provider.
My context provider is responsible to fetch some remote data and update the state based on responses:
import React, { useEffect } from 'react';
import useAppState from './useAppState';
export const AppContext = React.createContext();
const AppContextProvider = props => {
const [state, dispatch] = useAppState();
const initialFunction = () => {
fetch('/some_path')
.then(res => {
dispatch({ type: 'UPDATE_STATE', res });
});
};
const otherFunction = () => {
fetch('/other_path')
.then(res => {
// why is `state.stateUpdated` here still 'false'????
dispatch({ type: 'DO_SOMETHING_ELSE', res });
});
}
};
const actions = { initialFunction, otherFunction };
useEffect(() => {
initialFunction();
setInterval(otherFunction, 30000);
}, []);
return (
<AppContext.Provider value={{ state, actions }}>
{props.children}
</AppContext.Provider>
)
};
export default AppContextProvider;
and useAppState.js is very simple as:
import { useReducer } from 'react';
const useAppState = () => {
const reducer = (state, action) => {
switch (action.type) {
case 'UPDATE_STATE':
return {
...state,
stateUpdated: true,
};
case 'DO_SOMETHING_ELSE':
return {
...state,
// whatever else
};
default:
throw new Error();
}
};
const initialState = { stateUpdated: false };
return useReducer(reducer, initialState);
};
export default useAppState;
The question is, as stated in the comment above, why is state.stateUpdated in context provider's otherFunction still false and how could I access state with latest changes in the same function?
state will never change in that function
The reason state will never change in that function is that state is only updated on re-render. Therefore, if you want to access state you have two options:
useRef to see a future value of state (you'll have to modify your reducer to make this work)
const updatedState = useRef(initialState);
const reducer = (state, action) => {
let result;
// Do your switch but don't return, just modify result
updatedState.current = result;
return result;
};
return [...useReducer(reducer, initialState), updatedState];
You could reset your setInterval after every state change so that it would see the most up-to-date state. However, this means that your interval could get interrupted a lot.
const otherFunction = useCallback(() => {
fetch('/other_path')
.then(res => {
// why is `state.stateUpdated` here still 'false'????
dispatch({ type: 'DO_SOMETHING_ELSE', res });
});
}
}, [state.stateUpdated]);
useEffect(() => {
const id = setInterval(otherFunction, 30000);
return () => clearInterval(id);
}, [otherFunction]);

Categories

Resources