So I want to create a dynamic key in a js object. I know I can create it like this but id doesn't fullfil my requirements
return {
[dynamicKey]: value
}
But the problem is I want something like this
return {
[dynamicKey]_id: value
}
but it doesn't let me, I tried concatenating but it didn't work.
return {
[dynamicKey] + '_id': value
}
I've also searched online for a solution but couldn't find any.
you need to put your _id string inside of the square brackets or as part of the dinamicKey var.
return {
[dinamicKey + '_id']: value
}
dinamicKey += '_id';
return {
[dinamicKey]: value
}
Any expression in the square braces will be executed just like a normal expression.
So how about this:
return {
[dinamicKey + '_id']: value
}
Related
I already searched for similar issues but I didn't find anything that could help me yet.
I'm trying to reach a picture path (using JSON format) depending on the material type of the picked element. Actually, my code is built like this:
if (globalData.Material.Mat_type == "OSCILLOSCOPE") {
var picture = (globalData.Material.Oscilloscope.picture);
}
if (globalData.Material.Mat_type == "ALIMENTATION") {
var picture = (globalData.Material.Alim.picture);
}
But not optimized at all, so Im trying to make it this way :
var mat_type = (globalData.Material.Mat_type);
var picture = (globalData.Material[mat_type].picture);
But it doesn't work... Got some exception:
TypeError : globalData.Material[mat_type] is undefined.
I already tried a lot of things, have you got any idea? Thanks!
I outlined the issue with character case in the comment under the question, so presumably adjusting value of globalData.Material.Mat_type could do the trick:
var mat_type =
globalData.Material.Mat_type.charAt(0).toUpperCase() +
globalData.Material.Mat_type.substr(1).toLowerCase();
I can also see that this general rule may not be applicable in all cases. If it's not a typo, it won't work for the second case where Mat_type == "ALIMENTATION", because then you try to access Alim property of Material instead of Alimentation. In this case you could access property by prefix:
function pictureOf(material) {
if (!material || !String(material.Mat_type)) {
return null;
}
let mat_type = String(material.Mat_type).toUpperCase();
for (var propertyName in material) {
if (mat_type.startsWith(propertyName.toUpperCase())) {
return material[propertyName].picture || null;
}
}
return null;
}
console.log(pictureOf({
Mat_type: "OSCILLOSCOPE",
Oscilloscope: {
picture: "picture of oscilloscope"
}
}));
console.log(pictureOf({
Mat_type: "ALIMENTATION",
Alim: {
picture: "picture of alimentation"
}
}));
But this kind of approach can be error prone, if multiple properties share the same prefix. There's also a hidden issue with case-insensitive prefix matching in case you use some special unicode characters in property names. Lastly this method is not efficient, because it has to iterate over all properties of the object (worst case scenario). It can be replaced with much safer property mapping:
const matTypeMapping = {
"ALIMENTATION": "Alim"
};
function pictureOf(material) {
if (!material || !String(material.Mat_type)) {
return null;
}
let matType = String(material.Mat_type);
// find property mapping or apply general rule, if mapping not defined
let propertyName = matTypeMapping[matType] ||
matType.charAt(0).toUpperCase() + matType.substr(1).toLowerCase();
return material[propertyName].picture || null;
}
console.log(pictureOf({
Mat_type: "OSCILLOSCOPE",
Oscilloscope: {
picture: "picture of oscilloscope"
}
}));
console.log(pictureOf({
Mat_type: "ALIMENTATION",
Alim: {
picture: "picture of alimentation"
}
}));
NB: To avoid headaches, maybe you should prefer strict equality operator over loose equality operator.
Problem Solved
Peter Wolf was right ! It was a case-sensitive issue
I actually don't know how to promote his comment, sorry for this..
Anyway, thank you guys !
var mat_type = (globalData.Material.Mat_type);
if(mat_type!==undefined)
var picture = (globalData.Material[mat_type].picture)
Just do an existential check before accessing the value, for keys that may not be present.
I have an array of strings like so: ['foo', 'bar', 'foo/*/test'] and a random URL like this: http://www.example.com/foo/bar?test=123/another=one#test.
The URL may or may not contain a query or a hash prop.
Is there a regex or simple functionality to check the URL, in the URL contains any of those values in the array?
I am aware of the String.prototype.includes function so we could just do:
let path = location.pathname and then path.includes('foo'), but I want strings that contain the structure of foo/*/bar/ to be of higher importance.
For example if the URL is like this: http://www.example.com/foo/1234/test, the function should only return for the value foo/*/test instead of directly return with the foo value inside of the array.
So as soon as I have a string inside of the array which contains a / or something, I want this value to check first or give this the top prio so to speak.
Thanks!
Since the formatting inside a reply is all messed up, I have to post it like this:
#VincentDecaux totally understand.My first thoughts would have been sth like this:
function checkUrl(url, arr) {
const checkForPaths = arr.filter(val => val.match(/[\/](\w+)/ig));
if (checkForPaths.length) {
return true;
}
const filteredArray = arr.filter(val => url.includes(val));
if (filteredArray.length) {
return true;
}
return false;
}
This might already work since I only want the function to return true/false in order to display sth. on the page depemding on this.
I have an array that looks something like this.
Users : {
0 : { BidderBadge: "somestuff", Bidders: 6, }
1 : { BidderBadge: "somemorestuff", Bidders: 7,}
}
I want to search the array using lodash to find a value inside of each of the user objects.
Specifically, I want to use values from another similar array of objects to find the value.
var bidArray = [];
_.each(this.vue.AllUsers, function(user) {
_.each(this.vue.Bids, function(bid) {
if(user.BidderBadge == bid.Badge) {
bidArray.push(user);
}
});
});
This is what I have and it works, but I want to do it using only one loop instead of two. I want to use something like _.indexOf. Is that possible?
If you want to avoid nesting, you just have to modify Azamantes' solution a bit
var bidders = this.vue.Bids.reduce(function(acc, bid) {
return acc[bid.BidderBadge] = true;
}, {});
var bidArray = this.vue.AllBidders.filter(function(bidder) {
return !!bidders[bidder.Badge];
});
It is difficult to give an accurate answer with an example that doesn't coincide with the input that your provide.
Anyway, supposing your data structures were more or less like this ones, you could solve the problem with lodash _.intersectionWith.
Intersect both arrays using a comparator that checks the correct object properties. Also, take into account that users must go first in the intersection due to the fact that you're interested in its values.
function comparator(user, bid) {
return user.BidderBadge === bid.Badge;
}
console.log(_.intersectionWith(users, bids, comparator));
Here's the fiddle.
I have this
var matches = bookmarks.filter(function(x) {
return _.contains(x.get("tags"), 'apple');
});
Which will return the bookmark objects that have the apple tags
I want to put an array there instead to pull and all the bookmarks that have the matching values, similar to this
var matches = bookmarks.filter(function(x) {
return _.contains(x.get("tags"), ['apple','orange']);
});
This doesn't work, any way to get it to work?
EDIT: Im sorry, bookmarks is a collection and im trying to return the models that have the apple and orange tags
If tags is a string, your code it would be
return _.indexOf(x.get("tags"), ['apple','orange']) > -1;
Example with indexOf : jsFiddle
If tags is an array, you can use intersection
return _.intersection(['apple','orange'], x.get("tags")).length > 0;
Example with intersection: jsFiddle
There doesn't seem to be a function for that in underscore. However, you can easily combine other functions to accomplish this:
_.mixin({
containsAny: function(arr, values) {
// at least one (.some) of the values should be in the array (.contains)
return _.some(values, function(value) {
return _.contains(arr, value);
});
}
});
I'm running into a maddening problem where I set a variable to point to a jQuery selector, such as: var foobar=jQuery(this); I then pass this variable to a function to be worked on. Let's simplify a little and say the function looks like this:
function SetFieldValue (selector) {
selector.val('test');
console.log ( selector );
console.log ( jQuery('#' + selector.attr('id')) );
}
In this situation if you assume that:
the selector is always a form element (and therefore val() is a valid operation)
the selector does resolve to a single dom element which has an 'id' attribute
You would then expect the two console.log statements to output the same result, right? Well I'm running into a situation where this condition only happens about 90% of the time.
In order to give more context I've created a short screencast demonstrating the problem:
SCREENCAST LINK
For reference purposes, here's the actual SetFieldValue code that is shown in the screencast:
function SetFieldValue ( domObject, value ) {
// as a safety function, check if a string representation of the domObject was passed in and convert it to a jQuery object if it was
if ( jQuery.type(domObject) === "string") {
console.log ("Value passed into SetFieldValue was a string representation so converting to jQuery object");
domObject = jQuery(domObject);
}
if ( jQuery.inArray (domObject.prop('tagName').toLowerCase(),['input' , 'select' , 'textarea']) >= 0 ) {
console.log ("setting to value attribute: " + value);
if ( domObject.hasAttr('id') ) {
domObject.val(value);
//jQuery('#' + domObject.attr('id')).val(value);
} else {
domObject.attr('value',value);
}
console.log ("Using jQuery ID it is set to: " + jQuery('#' + domObject.attr('id')).val() );
console.log ("Using jQuery selector variable it is set to: " + domObject.val() );
} else {
console.log ("setting to html attribute");
domObject.html( value );
}
return domObject;
}
Lets examine the code a bit.
First assigning back to a parameter is not a good practice adding a var at the start of your function would be a lot better, as scope can be lost.
//Suggestion change parameter to domItem
var domObject
Your missing an error handler for when the parameter is not String.
when identifying the type use
<VARNAME>.constructor.toString().match(/function (\w*)/)[1] === "<TYPE>"
It's more efficient and handles custom types.
No need for all the logic in assignment of value attribute. Any dom Object can be made to have a value attribute. also not sure why you are setting the val versus the value.
domObject.attr('value',value);
It is at this point that I can see your code could really use some documentation to help explain purpose
If you are explicitly only wanting to set value on Input fields and set value as innerhtml on non input fields then yes the logic would be needed but could be simplified to ... as the value doesn't need to be detected to overwritten.
if (jQuery.inArray (domObject.prop('tagName').toLowerCase(), ['input' , 'select' , 'textarea']) >= 0) {
domObject.attr('value',value);
} else {
domObject.html( value );
}
No Idea why you are returning the domObject out.
So a quick rewrite without the return and keeping most of the logic adding error handling results in
/*jslint sloppy: true*/
/*global jQuery*/
function SetFieldValue(domString, value) {
// as a safety function, check if a string representation of the domObjects was passed in and convert it to a jQuery object if it was
var domObjects, index;
//errorhandling
if (domString === undefined || domString === null) {
throw {error : "domString must have a value."};
}
if (domString.constructor.toString().match(/function (\w*)/)[1] !== "string") {
if (domString.constructor.toString().match(/function (\w*)/)[1].match(/HTML[a-zA-Z]*Element/) === null) {
throw {error : "domString expected to be String or domObjects"};
}
} else {
if (jQuery(domString).length === 0) {
throw {error : "domString does not resolve to a detectable domObjects."};
}
}
//errorhandling
//action
if (domString.constructor.toString().match(/function (\w*)/)[1].match(/HTML[a-zA-Z]*Element/)) {
//made as an array to normalize as jQuery returns an array allows code to be simplified
domObjects = [domString];
} else {
domObjects = jQuery(domString);
}
//given that domObjects are an array need to step through the array
for (index = domObjects.length - 1; index >= 0; index -= 1) {
if (
jQuery.inArray(
domObjects[index].tagName.toLowerCase(),
['input', 'select', 'textarea']
) >= 0
) {
if (domObjects[index].hasAttr('id')) {
domObjects[index].val(value);
} else {
domObjects[index].attr('value', value);
}
} else {
domObjects[index].html(value);
}
}
}
The above passes JSLint
I know I didn't provide enough context for people to really dig into this problem but I have in the end solved it. What was the issue? Well it was #Kobi who first asked is the DOM element's ID unique ... to which I happily reported it was. And it had been but in fact that WAS the problem. Jesus. It's always the obvious things that you then go onto overlook that get you in trouble.
Anyway, thanks for your patience and help.