As a beginner still in JS, I have to crack someone else's code that is not documented, obviously.
At some point this code arrives to the function that is supposed to build an object.
let obj = {
catName:"cat",
catAge: someAge,
catLength: "one half of a meter no one cares how many cm",
...
}
This object is then sent to another function that is assigning keys to the table names to print out this object in .csv format against column names (to be able to open it in Excel for example)
The datamodel is saved in a separate JS file.
function that would parse to csv format uses this:
const pathtoFile = `////directories/cat.csv`;
const globalParser = new Parser({
header: !fs.existsSync(pathtoFile),
delimiter: ";",
excelStrings: false,
fields: ReportFields, //here is where the object data model comes from
});
const data = globalParser.parse(**catOBJ**) + "\n"; //catObj here is exactly what arrives and what is to be parsed
if (!fs.existsSync(pathtoFile)) {
fs.mkdirpSync(tmpcatReportsPath);
fs.writeFileSync(pathtoFile, data, "utf-8");
} else {
fs.appendFileSync(pathtoFile, data, "utf-8");
}
Problem:
I need to make sure that even if I do not know some of the values for some keys( ex: catLength), I can still assure that the object will get to .csv format and instead of this column name I will simply have ""
Questions:
Does it look more reasonable to you that I first fetch this template object , create an instance of it and then assign the parameters I know to it and then send it to the function?
if not, how do you proceed to make sure that the values that are not known are positioned as "" if I do not have a clue what these key-names are?
how do you proceed to make sure that the values that are not known are positioned as "" if I do not have a clue what these key-names are?
1) To obtain the keys of an object you should ouse the Object.keys() function, which returns an array with keys like ['catName', 'catAge', 'catLength', ...].
2) Once you have the keys of the object, you should map each of them and check if there is a null value:
let keys = Object.keys(obj); // Get array of keys
let result = {};
// Iterate all keys
keys.forEach(key => {
result[key] = (obj[key] == null ? "" : obj[key]);
});
Notice that using obj[key] == null will also catch undefined values.
You can try the code in the snippet:
let obj = {
catName: "cat",
catAge: 5,
catLength: "one half of a meter no one cares how many cm",
catColor: null // Need to catch this
};
let keys = Object.keys(obj);
let result = {};
keys.forEach(key => {
result[key] = (obj[key] == null ? "" : obj[key]);
});
console.log(result);
Related
I'm making a dictionary of words, so there are 1,000,000+ words.
The problem comes when I need to store the word constructor. I know this is a reserved word in javascript, but I need to add it to the dictionary.
var dictionary = {}
console.log(dictionary ['word_1'])
//undefined, this is good
console.log(dictionary ['word_2'])
//undefined, this is good
console.log(dictionary ['constructor'])
//[Function: Object]
// this cause initialization code to break
How can I fix this? I could muck with the it like key=key+"_" but that seems bad. Is there anything else I can do?
Instead of using a JS object, you could use the built-in Map type which uses strings/symbols as keys and does not conflict with any existing properties.
Replace
var dictionary = {} with var dictionary = new Map()
Override the constructor key as undefined
According to the MDN Object.prototype page, the only thing that isn't hidden by the __fieldname__ schema is the "constructor field". Thus, you could just initialize your objects via { 'constructor': undefined }.
However, you would have to make sure that in your for .. in statements would filter out all keys with undefined as their value, as it would pick up constructor as a "valid" key (even though it wouldn't before you specifically set it to undefined). I.E.
for(var key in obj) if(obj[key] !== undefined) { /* do things */ }
Check for types when getting/setting
Otherwise, you could just check the type when you 'fetch' or 'store' it. I.E.
function get(obj, key) {
if(typeof obj[key] !== 'function') // optionally, `&& typeof obj[key] !== 'object')`
return obj[key];
else
return undefined;
}
I think you should store all words and translation of them in an array. When you need to translate a word, you can use find method of Array.
For example:
var dict = [
{ word: "abc", translated: "xyz" },
...
];
Then:
var searching_word = "abc";
var translation = dict.find(function (item) {
return item.word == searching_word;
});
console.log(translation.translated);
// --> xyz
To achieve expected result , use below option of using index to get value of any key value
var dictionary = {};
var dictionary1 = {
constructor: "test"
};
//simple function to get key value using index
function getVal(obj, val) {
var keys = Object.keys(obj);
var index = keys.indexOf(val);//get index of key, in our case -contructor
return obj[keys[index]]; // return value using indec of that key
}
console.log(getVal(dictionary, "constructor"));//undefined as expected
console.log(getVal(dictionary1, "constructor"));//test
console.log(dictionary["word_1"]);
//undefined, this is good
console.log(dictionary["word_2"]);
//undefined, this is good
codepen - https://codepen.io/nagasai/pen/LOEGxM
For testing , I gave one object with key-constructor and other object without constructor.
Basically I am getting the index of key first and getting value using index
I want to create data structure like that.
Var ans =[{"b":[1,2]},{"g":[100,2]}]
I want to create a new object within list if key not exists in list ans.
Else if key exists in one object of ans list then I want to add new values into the object of ans list
For Example:
Example 1) new data c:{2000}
then
Var ans =[{"b":[1,2]},{"g":[100,2]},{c:[2000]}]
Example 2) new data g:{50}
then
Var ans =[{"b":[1,2]},{"g":[100,2,500]},{c:[2000]}]
I am a beginner in node js, understand array, object concept, but not getting exact logic!
Thanks!
You can try following:
Logic
Filter array based on key
Check if object with mentioned key exists or not.
If yes, push value to this array.
If not, create a dummy object and push this object to original array.
Correction, when you do .push({key: value}), key will be considered as string.
Alternates
If you are using ES6, .push({ [key] : value })
Create a dummy object var o = {}. Set key and value to it o[key] = value and push this object.
Optimisations
Instead of setting value like obj[key] = value, since we will be operating on arrays, try obj[key] = [].concat(value). This will enable you to pass value as number or array of values.
Instead of checking the existence of value in .filter, try Array.isArray to check if value exists and is of type array.
Custom function
function checkAndPush(array, key, value) {
var filteredList = array.filter(function(o) {
return Array.isArray(o[key]);
});
filteredList.length > 0 ? filteredList[0][key].push(value) : array.push({
[key]: [].concat(value)
});
return array;
}
var ans =[{"b":[1,2]},{"g":[100,2]}]
console.log(checkAndPush(ans, "c", [2,3]))
console.log(checkAndPush(ans, "c", 4));
Prototype function
Array.prototype.checkAndPush = function(key, value) {
var filteredList = this.filter(function(o) {
return Array.isArray(o[key]);
});
var dummy = {}
dummy[key] = [].concat(value)
filteredList.length > 0 ? filteredList[0][key].push(value) : this.push(dummy);
// or ES6: this.push({ [key]: [].concat(value) })
return this;
}
var ans =[{"b":[1,2]},{"g":[100,2]}]
console.log(ans.checkAndPush("c", [2,3]))
console.log(ans.checkAndPush("c", 4));
If you are dealing with objects as your values
ans[key] = ans[key] || []
ans[key].push(value)
Note, this works because your values will be an array. If they could be primatives then you would use hasOwnProperty to check.
if (ans.hasOwnProperty(key)) {
// Add this to your key somehow
} else {
// initialize the key with your value
}
Node.js is nothing but a library built on javascript. You can do anything using javascript type of progmming. However push and pop method should be able to help you to deal with nodejs array.
ans[key].push(value)
I have a function which takes a list of dictionaries [{}] as an argument. It manipulates this list of dicts by adding a new key: value pair to it where value is again a list of dictionaries. This is what the function looks like, I've added comments to explain it.
function addFilesToProjects(nonUniqueArray, lists) {
var fileList = [{}]; //this will contain the list of dictionaries that I want to add as a key to the array 'nonUniqueArray'
var filesArray = []; //this was just for testing purposes because I want to access the modified version of nonUniqueArray outside the function, which I'm not able to (it shows undefined for the new key:value pair)
for (var i = 0; i < nonUniqueArray.length; i++) {
lists.forEach(function (list) {
fileNameString = JSON.stringify(list['name']).slice(2, -2);
if (fileNameString.indexOf(nonUniqueArray[i]['title']) !== -1 && fileNameString !== nonUniqueArray[i]['title']) {
fileList.push({
'name': fileNameString
});
}
});
nonUniqueArray[i]['files'] = fileList;
//this logs out the right key:value pair to the console
console.log(nonUniqueArray[i]);
filesArray.push(nonUniqueArray[i]);
while (fileList.length > 0) {
fileList.pop();
}
}
//however, now I get everything as before except the new 'files' key has empty list [] as its value :(
console.log(nonUniqueArray);
return filesArray;
}
I have no clue why is this happening, can someone help?
You seem to think that you are adding a copy of fileList into each dictionary, but in fact are adding the same fileList into each (that is, each is a reference to the same object) so that, as #vlaz points out, when you empty out the original, you are in fact emptying out what appears in each dictionary.
I am learning functional programming in Javascript and using Ramda. I have this object
var fieldvalues = { name: "hello there", mobile: "1234",
meta: {status: "new"},
comments: [ {user: "john", comment: "hi"},
{user:"ram", comment: "hello"}]
};
to be converted like this:
{
comments.0.comment: "hi",
comments.0.user: "john",
comments.1.comment: "hello",
comments.1.user: "ram",
meta.status: "new",
mobile: "1234",
name: "hello there"
}
I have tried this Ramda source, which works.
var _toDotted = function(acc, obj) {
var key = obj[0], val = obj[1];
if(typeof(val) != "object") { // Matching name, mobile etc
acc[key] = val;
return acc;
}
if(!Array.isArray(val)) { // Matching meta
for(var k in val)
acc[key + "." + k] = val[k];
return acc;
}
// Matching comments
for(var idx in val) {
for(var k2 in val[idx]) {
acc[key + "." + idx + "." + k2] = val[idx][k2];
}
}
return acc;
};
// var toDotted = R.pipe(R.toPairs, R.reduce(_toDotted, {}));
var toDotted = R.pipe(R.toPairs, R.curry( function(obj) {
return R.reduce(_toDotted, {}, obj);
}));
console.log(toDotted(fieldvalues));
However, I am not sure if this is close to Functional programming methods. It just seems to be wrapped around some functional code.
Any ideas or pointers, where I can make this more functional way of writing this code.
The code snippet available here.
UPDATE 1
Updated the code to solve a problem, where the old data was getting tagged along.
Thanks
A functional approach would
use recursion to deal with arbitrarily shaped data
use multiple tiny functions as building blocks
use pattern matching on the data to choose the computation on a case-by-case basis
Whether you pass through a mutable object as an accumulator (for performance) or copy properties around (for purity) doesn't really matter, as long as the end result (on your public API) is immutable. Actually there's a nice third way that you already used: association lists (key-value pairs), which will simplify dealing with the object structure in Ramda.
const primitive = (keys, val) => [R.pair(keys.join("."), val)];
const array = (keys, arr) => R.addIndex(R.chain)((v, i) => dot(R.append(keys, i), v), arr);
const object = (keys, obj) => R.chain(([v, k]) => dot(R.append(keys, k), v), R.toPairs(obj));
const dot = (keys, val) =>
(Object(val) !== val
? primitive
: Array.isArray(val)
? array
: object
)(keys, val);
const toDotted = x => R.fromPairs(dot([], x))
Alternatively to concatenating the keys and passing them as arguments, you can also map R.prepend(key) over the result of each dot call.
Your solution is hard-coded to have inherent knowledge of the data structure (the nested for loops). A better solution would know nothing about the input data and still give you the expected result.
Either way, this is a pretty weird problem, but I was particularly bored so I figured I'd give it a shot. I mostly find this a completely pointless exercise because I cannot picture a scenario where the expected output could ever be better than the input.
This isn't a Rambda solution because there's no reason for it to be. You should understand the solution as a simple recursive procedure. If you can understand it, converting it to a sugary Rambda solution is trivial.
// determine if input is object
const isObject = x=> Object(x) === x
// flatten object
const oflatten = (data) => {
let loop = (namespace, acc, data) => {
if (Array.isArray(data))
data.forEach((v,k)=>
loop(namespace.concat([k]), acc, v))
else if (isObject(data))
Object.keys(data).forEach(k=>
loop(namespace.concat([k]), acc, data[k]))
else
Object.assign(acc, {[namespace.join('.')]: data})
return acc
}
return loop([], {}, data)
}
// example data
var fieldvalues = {
name: "hello there",
mobile: "1234",
meta: {status: "new"},
comments: [
{user: "john", comment: "hi"},
{user: "ram", comment: "hello"}
]
}
// show me the money ...
console.log(oflatten(fieldvalues))
Total function
oflatten is reasonably robust and will work on any input. Even when the input is an array, a primitive value, or undefined. You can be certain you will always get an object as output.
// array input example
console.log(oflatten(['a', 'b', 'c']))
// {
// "0": "a",
// "1": "b",
// "2": "c"
// }
// primitive value example
console.log(oflatten(5))
// {
// "": 5
// }
// undefined example
console.log(oflatten())
// {
// "": undefined
// }
How it works …
It takes an input of any kind, then …
It starts the loop with two state variables: namespace and acc . acc is your return value and is always initialized with an empty object {}. And namespace keeps track of the nesting keys and is always initialized with an empty array, []
notice I don't use a String to namespace the key because a root namespace of '' prepended to any key will always be .somekey. That is not the case when you use a root namespace of [].
Using the same example, [].concat(['somekey']).join('.') will give you the proper key, 'somekey'.
Similarly, ['meta'].concat(['status']).join('.') will give you 'meta.status'. See? Using an array for the key computation will make this a lot easier.
The loop has a third parameter, data, the current value we are processing. The first loop iteration will always be the original input
We do a simple case analysis on data's type. This is necessary because JavaScript doesn't have pattern matching. Just because were using a if/else doesn't mean it's not functional paradigm.
If data is an Array, we want to iterate through the array, and recursively call loop on each of the child values. We pass along the value's key as namespace.concat([k]) which will become the new namespace for the nested call. Notice, that nothing gets assigned to acc at this point. We only want to assign to acc when we have reached a value and until then, we're just building up the namespace.
If the data is an Object, we iterate through it just like we did with an Array. There's a separate case analysis for this because the looping syntax for objects is slightly different than arrays. Otherwise, it's doing the exact same thing.
If the data is neither an Array or an Object, we've reached a value. At this point we can assign the data value to the acc using the built up namespace as the key. Because we're done building the namespace for this key, all we have to do compute the final key is namespace.join('.') and everything works out.
The resulting object will always have as many pairs as values that were found in the original object.
I have an array of objects like so
myobj= [{"item1" : info in here},{"item2" : info in here}, {"item3" : info in here}]
I'm trying to modify one, but I only know its key. I need to pinpoint the item1 object so I can change its value (the values are random and I don't know them, so I can't rely upon them).
If I could just get the index of the item it would be pretty easy: myobj[index].value = "newvalue".
Maybe using the index isn't the best way, so if it isn't, I'm open to other ideas.
I was thinking I could try something like
myobj.objectVar
Where objectVar is the key I'm being passed (item1, for example), however this does not work, possibly because it's a variable? Is it possible to use a variable like this maybe?
If it helps, I'm using underscore.js as well.
Your guess at a solution doesn't work because you're not accessing the individual objects, you're accessing an array of objects, each of which has a single property.
To use the data in the format you've got now, you need to iterate over the outer array until you find the object that contains the key you're after, and then modify its value.
myobj= [{"item1" : info in here},{"item2" : info in here}, {"item3" : info in here}]
function setByKey(key, value) {
myObj.forEach(function (obj) {
// only works if your object's values are truthy
if (obj[key]) {
obj[key] = value;
}
});
}
setByKey('item1', 'new value');
Of course, the far better solution is to stop using an array of single-property objects, and just use one object with multiple properties:
myobj= {"item1" : info in here, "item2" : info in here, "item3" : info in here};
Now, you can simply use myObject.item1 = "some new value" and it will work fine.
You can write a function like,
function getElementsHavingKey(key) {
var objectsHavingGivenKey = [];
//loop through all the objects in the array 'myobj'
myobj.forEach(function(individualObject) {
//you can use 'hasOwnProperty' method to find whether the provided key
// is present in the object or not
if(individualObject.hasOwnProperty(key)) {
// if the key is present, store the object having the key
// into the array (many objects may have same key in it)
objectsHavingGivenKey.push(individualObject);
}
});
// return the array containing the objects having the keys
return objectsHavingGivenKey;
}
If you only want to get the index of elements having the given key
You can do something like this,
function getIndexesOfElementsHavingKey(key) {
var objectsHavingGivenKey = [];
//loop through all the objects in the array 'myobj'
myobj.forEach(function(individualObject, index) {
//you can use 'hasOwnProperty' method to find whether the provided key
// is present in the object or not
if(individualObject.hasOwnProperty(key)) {
//push index of element which has the key
objectsHavingGivenKey.push(index);
}
});
// returns the array of element indexes which has the key
return objectsHavingGivenKey;
}
Try this code:
function changeObj( obj, key, newval )
{
for( var i=0, l=obj.length; i<j; i++)
{
if( key in obj[i] )
{
obj[i] = newval;
return;
}
}
}
var myObjArray= [{"item1" : "info in here"},{"item2" : "info in here"}, {"item3" : "info in here"}]
To find and add new value to the object inside an array:
myObjArray.forEach(function(obj) {
for(var key in obj) {
// in case you're matching key & value
if(key === "item1") {
obj[key] = "update value";
// you can even set new property as well
obj.newkey = "New value";
}
}
});
You can access objects the same using their index, even the object inside the original object.
Is this kind of what your looking for:
var otherObj = [{"oitem":"oValue"}];
var myobj= [{"item1" : otherObj},{"item2" : "2"}, {"item3" : "tesT"}];
myobj[0].item1[0].oitem = "newvalue";
alert(myobj[0].item1[0].oitem);