Closed. This question is not reproducible or was caused by typos. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question was caused by a typo or a problem that can no longer be reproduced. While similar questions may be on-topic here, this one was resolved in a way less likely to help future readers.
Closed 1 year ago.
Improve this question
Below is a small code snippet. Can't really understand what mistake I am making, but two false when ORed (||) is resulting into true. Can someone help me please?
Here is the code:
let result = {isVerified: 'verified'}
console.log(result.isVerified, !result.isVerified, result.isVerified !== 'verified', ((!result.isVerified) || (result.isverified !== 'verified')));
I am using node version v14.16.1
try using this code
You have writen isVerified as isverified
let result = { isVerified: "verified" };
console.log(
result.isVerified,
!result.isVerified,
result.isVerified !== "verified",
!result.isVerified || result.isVerified !== "verified"
);
Related
Closed. This question is not reproducible or was caused by typos. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question was caused by a typo or a problem that can no longer be reproduced. While similar questions may be on-topic here, this one was resolved in a way less likely to help future readers.
Closed 1 year ago.
Improve this question
I'm trying to return a Boolean value based on truthy of a given condition from an arrow function. The code is look like following
checkIsBasicInformationCompleted() {
const info = this.basicInformation;
const valid = () => {return !!(info.firstName && info.lastName && info.email && info.phone);};
console.log(valid);
},
But here instead of returning true/false, this function is printing itself. Can anybody explain the thing running here ? And how can I get a true/false value here ?
Fiddle sample: https://jsfiddle.net/tebz4Lc3/
You are printing a reference to the function here, use console.log( valid() ) to actually execute the function and print the return value.
console.log(valid());
This is how the logging should be.
Closed. This question is not reproducible or was caused by typos. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question was caused by a typo or a problem that can no longer be reproduced. While similar questions may be on-topic here, this one was resolved in a way less likely to help future readers.
Closed 6 years ago.
Improve this question
This is happening on an angular application I'm building. If a user enters 80 into an HTML input, it always seems to get this comparison wrong.
var x = '80';
var y = 150.9800;
/* Returns incorrect answer */
if (parceFloat(x) < y) {
return true;
} else {
return false;
}
You need to use ParseFloat() not parceFloat() ...
parceFloat is not an existing function.
parceFloat() is not a function, the function is parseFloat()
A simple typo is all the error there is.
Closed. This question is not reproducible or was caused by typos. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question was caused by a typo or a problem that can no longer be reproduced. While similar questions may be on-topic here, this one was resolved in a way less likely to help future readers.
Closed 6 years ago.
Improve this question
var input = message.content.toUpperCase();
if(input.indexOf("!")
{
bot.sendMessage(message, "!!!");
}
Help would be great, also earlier input was defined earlier
The String#indexOf method returns the index if found else returns -1. In your case .indexOf("!") return 0 and it's a false value and if statement never gets executed,so update your condition based on that.
if(input.indexOf("!") > -1)
or
if(input.indexOf("!") != -1)
Closed. This question is not reproducible or was caused by typos. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question was caused by a typo or a problem that can no longer be reproduced. While similar questions may be on-topic here, this one was resolved in a way less likely to help future readers.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
Can someone please explain why this code isn't working?
(it has been simplified for this example)
$(document).ready(function () {
var test = 'broken';
test = test.replace('broken','working');
console.log(test); // working
var field = $('[for="tournament_name"]').html();
console.log(field); // Tournament Name:
console.log(typeof field); // string
field = field.relpace(':',''); // Uncaught TypeError: undefined is not a function
});
I don't understand why it is saying replace() is undefined?
I did read through the docs, what am I missing here?
Maybe it's a typo:
relpace --> replace
Closed. This question is not reproducible or was caused by typos. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question was caused by a typo or a problem that can no longer be reproduced. While similar questions may be on-topic here, this one was resolved in a way less likely to help future readers.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
So, I have the script below and it successfully checks the values of the inputs when I click on a div with onclick="checkInputs()" inside.
But when I click the div again, it doesn't run the code. would I have to put return false; after it?
function checkInputs() {
if (document.getElementById("emailAdressInput").Value === "ADRESSHERE" && document.getElementById("passwordInput").Value === "PassHere")
{
document.getElementById("notifier").innerHTML = "Login Successful!";
}
else
{
document.getElementById("notifier").innerHTML = "Login Unsuccessful.";
}
}
To get the value of element you should use value not Value
document.getElementById("passwordInput").value
instead of
document.getElementById("passwordInput").Value;
UPDATE
Here is your working DEMO
The strict operator === checks for type also, If you put passHere instead of PassHere it reurns false.