i was wondering how to make a variable go up over time, ive tried to do this -->
var i = 1;
var c = document.getElementById("click");
function workers() {
if (click >= workers*50000)) {
click += -(workers*50000)
click += i++
c.innerHTML = click;
}
}
but it hasnt worked, how do i fix this?
you could do this
let i = 0;
// instead of 2000 insert the frequency of the wanted update (in milliseconds)
const incrementInterval = setInterval(() => i++, 2000)
// when you want it to stop it
clearInterval(incrementInterval)
anyway, i don't really understand how the code supplied with the question has anything to do with it
You have an element and a variable 'click', which tells me you're really not wanting to grow over time per se, but rather grow with every click.
Another difficulty is finding out what you're trying to do with multiplying by 50000. I am assuming you are trying to reset the count after 50000.
One big thing you're missing is the actual association of the click event to your 'click' HTML element. Below, I'm using addEventListener to do that. From there, I'm resetting the counter to '1' if 'i' goes above '5' (I use 5 just to show the reset in a reasonable number of clicks). Then I take the value of 'i' and put it into the innerHTML label of the element that triggered the event.
var i = 1;
document
.getElementById("click")
.addEventListener('click', function(e) {
if (i > 5)
i = 1;
e.target.innerHTML = `click: ${i++}`;
})
<div id='click'>click<div>
Define your question better. What is your goal? What has your code achieved? What result are you getting and how is it different than your expectations? What is 'i' meant to be used for? How does it interact with the function? Why are you multiplying it with 50000? Is workers a separate variable that's globally defined and not shown? Communication is an important skill in this field, and comments are often helpful tools to document your code for others to understand.
I think an alternative answer could be formatted in this way:
let i = 0;
function increment(){
i++;
document.querySelector('h3').textContent = i
}
document.querySelector('button').addEventListener('click',increment)
<button>Click Me</button>
<h3>0</h3>
Related
I have a code where I draw an object when the mouse is clicked using mouseClicked = function(){} and then I need to have a number to show how many objects have been drawn. the problem is that the number won't increase. what do I do?
Rather than declaring and incrementing a global variable - you could set the count as a HTML 5 data attribute on the button and then on clicking the button, get the data attribute value, increment it and update the display and the new count on the button.
Note that data-attributes are always strings - hence the need for the parseInt() method, though if I was being a purist - I would have put the radix in as well, but that defaults to 10 - so no need in this case.
It is always better to avoid global variable when possible and data attributes offer a very conveniant way of storing local data.
Thanks to #Sven.hig for the skeletn code of the solution - which I then modified to my approach.
var res=document.getElementById("res")
var btn=document.getElementById("btn")
btn.addEventListener("click",()=>{
const newCount = parseInt(btn.getAttribute('data-count'))+1;
res.textContent = newCount;
btn.setAttribute('data-count', newCount)
})
<div id="res"></div>
<button id="btn" data-count="0">Draw</button>
Here is a simple example that will give you an idea about how to increment a counter
var res=document.getElementById("res")
var btn=document.getElementById("btn")
var count=1
btn.addEventListener("click",()=>{
res.textContent=count
count++
})
<div id="res"></div>
<button id="btn">Draw</button>
If the count variable is defined inside the mouseClicked function as the title say, you are recreating it in every mouseClick. In this case, you should define it outter the function with value = 0 and, inside the function, sum 1 to that value. Anyway, like the comments say, it's necessary that you include the code to your question to give a better answer.
this is an easy way to counter the clicks on a html document.
let counter = 0;
document.onclick = () => {
counter++;
console.log(counter);
}
WHAT I WANT TO HAPPEN
So what I want to happen is function partA() to click button [z] every 2 seconds. The button that is being clicked should change, because the script is a looping script, so for instance. The first loop, it would click button 1, then button 2, then button 3, because var z = 1 + i++. Is this possible? z is supposed to equal the number 1, plus the loop number. This should loop as long as variable i is less than 50.
WHAT IS HAPPENING
It works properly, looping and all, if I test the script without variable z. However, without variable z, I have to manually change the number that would equal z, which is painstaking, and annoying.
var z = 1 + i++
for(i=0;i<50;i++) {
setInterval(partA, 2000);
function partA() {
buttons = document.getElementsByTagName('button');
document.getElementsByTagName('button')[z].click();
}
}
Should i++ be defined another way? The error I'm getting when running the script in console is:
Uncaught ReferenceError: i is not defined (...)
at :2:13
at Object.InjectedScript._evaluateOn (:878:140)
at Object.InjectedScript._evaluateAndWrap (:811:34)
at Object.InjectedScript.evaluate (:667:21)
There's a couple of suggestions I could advise with your code so I'll try and address each one individually.
Firstly define your function outside of your loop. If you would like to know the reasons behind this please read: Don't make functions within a loop
Secondly you should really declare i as a variable to set the scope to which it applies. Some good information on this is at: Declaring variables without var keyword
Thirdly when you run your loop you could run the code inside an IIFE. The reason for this is when you run setInterval, by the time it runs i will actually be 3 (or the last number of your loop). This is due to the asynchronous nature of setInterval, and that the reference to i is bound to the function, not the value of i.
Example
for(var i=0;i<3;i++) {
(function(i) {
setInterval(clickButton(i), 2000);
})(i)
}
function clickButton(idx) {
return function() {
buttons = document.getElementsByTagName('button');
document.getElementsByTagName('button')[idx].click();
}
}
JSBin Demo
http://jsbin.com/harigewuze/edit?html,js,output
Why are you trying to define z outside the loop? Just use i.
for (var i = 0; i < 50; i++) {
...
document.getElementsByTagName('button')[i].click();
}
without changing your code too much I would write it like this...
you know its looping 50 times, you know i is incrementing from 0 to 49, use i to change the button name and you don't need z...
for(i=0;i<50;i++) {
setInterval(partA, 2000);
function partA() {
buttons = document.getElementsByTagName('button');
document.getElementsByTagName('button')[i + 1].click();
}
}
1) This is how you want your code to look like :
var z;
for(i=0;i<50;i++) {
z=i;
setInterval(partA, 2000);
}
function partA() {
buttons = document.getElementsByTagName('button');
document.getElementsByTagName('button')[z].click();
}
2) Unfortunately, in javascript you have a problem with this code due to the fact of scopes. My recommendation is to read this link first http://www.mennovanslooten.nl/blog/post/62 and understand how it works.
If you did understand it, then thumb up..you just promoted yourself to a higher level in javascript ;)
3) If you are still having issues, post it on JSFiddle
I'm having some issues with simulating live typing with jQuery. My Javascript is as follows (with a live demo here).
$(document).ready(function () {
var keystrokes = [];
var value = "";
var counter = 0;
window.setInterval(pushKeystrokes, 100);
function pushKeystrokes() {
keystrokes.push({
value: value
});
}
$("#test").keyup(function () {
value = $(this).val();
});
$("#button").click(function () {
$("#test").val("");
$.each(keystrokes, function () {
window.setTimeout(function () {
$("#test").val(keystrokes[counter].value);
}, 100 * counter);
counter++;
});
});
});
This is supposed to wait for input to a text field called test, and as soon as a button is clicked, it should clear that text field and simulate typing the characters the user typed in real-time. For some reason, my call to setTimeout only produces the very last value in the array.
However, if I set Math.random as the value of the text field in the setTimeout instead of keystrokes[counter].value, it seems to update fine every 100 milliseconds as it should. What exactly am I doing wrong? I'm guessing it has something to do with scope.
Edit:
Sorry I wasn't clear. I would like to preserve delays in user action, i.e. waiting a few seconds before typing, typing words at different speeds, etc. Is this still possible?
I've edited the code you posted in your JSBin, modified a few things here and there.
The logic behind the rewritten script is added in the form of comments.
Here's an example
Try this example http://jsbin.com/eVOcOku/4/.
In your example you have additional issue with timeInterval.
There are a few problems you're having here, some to do with unnecessary code, and some to do with the nature of setTimeout
First of all the pushKeyStrokes() function seems dodgy; it only checks every 100 ms? Besides, it's not needed because later you can just go through the string provided by the input once the button is pressed, and you can do that using charAt.
Secondly, you're referring to the value "counter" within your setTimeout function, but by the time that function is called the counter value will have reached the length of the input string; counter++ will already have been called every time before the first call to the character display function is even made!
In any case, I modified your JS Bin; hope it makes sense and let me know if you have any questions:
$(document).ready(function() {
var value = "";
$test = $("#test");
$("#button").click(function() {
value = $test.val();
$test.val("");
for (var i = 0; i < value.length; i++)
{
window.setTimeout(addChar, 100 * i, value.charAt(i));
}
function addChar(char)
{
$test.val($test.val() + char);
}
});
});
I have a game I'm creating where lights run around the outside of a circle, and you must try and stop the light on the same spot three times in a row. Currently, I'm using the following code to loop through the lights and turn them "on" and "off":
var num_lights = 20;
var loop_speed = 55;
var light_index = 0;
var prevent_stop = false; //If true, prevents user from stopping light
var loop = setTimeout(startLoop, loop_speed);
function startLoop() {
prevent_stop = false;
$(".light:eq(" + light_index + ")").css("background-color", "#fff");
light_index++;
if(light_index >= num_lights) {
light_index = 0;
}
$(".light:eq(" + light_index + ")").css("background-color", "red");
loop = setTimeout(startLoop, loop_speed);
}
function stopLoop() {
clearTimeout(loop);
}
For the most part, the code seems to run pretty well, but if I have a video running simultaneously in another tab, the turning on and off of the lights seems to chug a bit. Any input on how I could possibly speed this up would be great.
For an example of the code from above, check out this page: http://ericditmer.com/wheel
When optimizing the thing to look at first is not doing twice anything you only need to do once. Looking up an element from the DOM can be expensive and you definitely know which elements you want, so why not pre-fetch all of them and void doing that multiple times?
What I mean is that you should
var lights = $('.light');
So that you can later just say
lights.eq(light_index).css("background-color", "red");
Just be sure to do the first thing in a place which keeps lights in scope for the second.
EDIT: Updated per comment.
I would make a global array of your selector references, so they selector doesn't have to be executed every time the function is called. I would also consider swapping class names, rather than attributes.
Here's some information of jQuery performance:
http://www.componenthouse.com/article-19
EDIT: that article id quite old though and jQuery has evolved a lot since. This is more recent: http://blog.dynatrace.com/2009/11/09/101-on-jquery-selector-performance/
You could try storing the light elements in an array instead of using a selector each time. Class selectors can be a little slow.
var elements = $('.light');
function startLoop() {
prevent_stop = false;
$(elements[light_index]).css('background-color', '#fff');
...
}
This assumes that the elements are already in their intended order in the DOM.
One thing I will note is that you have used a setTimeout() and really just engineered it to behave like setInterval().
Try using setInterval() instead. I'm no js engine guru but I would like to think the constant reuse of setTimeout has to have some effect on performance that would not be present using setInterval() (which you only need to set once).
Edit:
Curtousy of Diodeus, a related post to back my statement:
Related Stack Question - setTimeout() vs setInterval()
OK, this includes some "best practice" improvements, if it really optimizes the execution speed should be tested. At least you can proclaim you're now coding ninja style lol
// create a helper function that lend the array reverse function to reverse the
// order of a jquery sets. It's an object by default, not an array, so using it
// directly would fail
$.fn.reverse = Array.prototype.reverse;
var loop,
loop_speed = 55,
prevent_stop = false,
// prefetch a jquery set of all lights and reverses it to keep the right
// order when iterating backwards (small performance optimization)
lights = $('.light').reverse();
// this named function executes as soon as it's initialized
// I wrapped everything into a second function, so the variable prevent_stop is
// only set once at the beginning of the loop
(function startLoop() {
// keep variables always in the scope they are needed
// changed the iteration to count down, because checking for 0 is faster.
var num_lights = light_index = lights.length - 1;
prevent_stop = false;
// This is an auto-executing, self-referencing function
// which avoids the 55ms delay when starting the loop
loop = setInterval((function() {
// work with css-class changing rather than css manipulation
lights.eq( light_index ).removeClass('active');
// if not 0 iterate else set to num_lights
light_index = (light_index)? --light_index:num_lights;
lights.eq( light_index ).addClass('active');
// returns a referenze to this function so it can be executed by setInterval()
return arguments.callee;
})(), loop_speed);
})();
function stopLoop() {
clearInterval(loop);
}
Cheers neutronenstern
I wanted to write a javascript code that will slide a div in specific direction, distance and in some given time. I wrote this small script. but doesn't work at all. Instead browser gets slow. No change in position is visible.
Can someone tell me how to achieve the result ? I know there are many ready made libraries that can do this easily. But I just wanted to give it a try.
<script type="text/javascript" language="javascript">
var element = '';
var slidePerMS = '';
function slideIt(ele, direction, distance, slideDuration){
element = ele;
var i=0;
slidePerMS = distance / (slideDuration*1000);
for(i=0; i<3000; i++){
setTimeout("changePosition()",1);
}
}
function changePosition(){
var currElement = document.getElementById(element);
currElement.style.left = "'"+slidePerMS+"px'";
}
</script>
SOO many things wrong with that code it's not even funny... Let's see...
You are trying to render a 1,000 FPS animation. This is simply impossible for a browser.
You are passing a string as parameter to setTimeout, which is as evil as eval.
You set slidePerMS once but never change it after, resulting in the div being moved to the exact same spot over and over.
You are setting the style with extra quotes inside - do you put quotes in a CSS file?
That's to name but a few. Try this instead:
<script type="text/javascript" language="javascript">
function slideIt(elem, direction, distance, slideDuration){
var elmt = document.getElementById(elem),
i=0, step = distance / (slideDuration*20),
stepper = setInterval(function() {
i = Math.min(distance,i+step);
elmt.style.left = i+'px';
if( i == distance) clearInterval(stepper);
},50);
}
</script>
You have many problems.
You are treating setTimeout as if it was sleep. Don't do that. It isn't like sleep at all, it runs a function after a given period of time, but doesn't pause the execution of anything else.
This means you just hammer the function repeatedly 3000 times, which is what is locking up the browser.
Instead of using a for loop, you should be using setInterval.
Don't pass a string to setInterval (or setTimeout), it gets evaled, which is slow and hard to debug, and it breaks scope. Pass a function instead.
Inside changePosition you are trying to use a variable called slidePerMS, which is undefined because it is defined in the scope of slideIt.
You are also trying to set left to "'123px'". You can't quote your values in CSS.
Get rid of both the 's.
This is why you can't see any change. Invalid values are ignored in CSS.