I am having problems while trying to test effects in my Angular 11 project. I use the karma runner. It would seem that when I dispatch an action in my tests, the effects does't seem to respond to it.
import { TestBed } from '#angular/core/testing';
import { of } from 'rxjs';
import { provideMockActions } from '#ngrx/effects/testing';
import {
SimpleActionTypes,
} from '../actions/simple.action';
import {SimpleEffects} from './simple.effect';
import {MockStore, provideMockStore} from '#ngrx/store/testing';
import {Store} from '#ngrx/store';
describe('SimpleEffects', () => {
let actions$: any;
let effects: SimpleEffects;
let store: MockStore<Store>;
beforeEach(() => {
TestBed.configureTestingModule({
providers: [
SimpleEffects,
provideMockActions(() => actions$),
provideMockStore() ,
],
});
store = TestBed.inject(MockStore);
effects = TestBed.inject(SimpleEffects);
});
it('should be created', () => {
expect(effects).toBeTruthy();
});
it('should fire with a default price', (done) => {
// Mock the action that we use to activate the effect
actions$ = of(SimpleActionTypes.UnavailablePrice);
// Subscribe to the effect
effects.getPriceAfterLocalCartUpdate.subscribe((res) => {
// the expected results verification
expect(res).toEqual(SimpleActionTypes.ComputePrice);
// And all done !
done();
});
});
});
I have tried many ways to enter the subscribe part of my effect (using marbles hot cold ...), but it doesn't seem to work. I have a failure indicating :
"SimpleEffects should fire with a default price FAILED
Error: Timeout - Async function did not complete within 5000ms (set by jasmine.DEFAULT_TIMEOUT_INTERVAL)"
The micro project is hosted here : https://github.com/Ushelajyan/simple-ngrx-testing-effects
Thank you in advance for your help.
You override actions$ within your test (it-block). Unfortunately the TestBed.configureTestingModule() gets executed inside a beforeEach block, which happens right before the it-block gets executed.
import { TestBed } from '#angular/core/testing';
import { of } from 'rxjs';
import { provideMockActions } from '#ngrx/effects/testing';
import {
SimpleActionTypes,
} from '../actions/simple.action';
import {SimpleEffects} from './simple.effect';
import {MockStore, provideMockStore} from '#ngrx/store/testing';
import {Store} from '#ngrx/store';
describe('SimpleEffects', () => {
let store: MockStore<Store>;
const createEffects = (actions$) => {
TestBed.configureTestingModule({
providers: [
SimpleEffects,
provideMockActions(() => actions$),
provideMockStore() ,
],
});
store = TestBed.inject(MockStore);
return TestBed.inject(SimpleEffects);
};
it('should be created', () => {
const effects = createEffects(of(undefined));
expect(effects).toBeTruthy();
});
it('should fire with a default price', (done) => {
// Mock the action that we use to activate the effect
const actions$ = of(SimpleActionTypes.UnavailablePrice);
// Create the effect with your given mock
const effects = createEffects(actions$)
effects.getPriceAfterLocalCartUpdate.subscribe((res) => {
// the expected results verification
expect(res).toEqual(SimpleActionTypes.ComputePrice);
// And all done !
done();
});
});
});
This should do the trick.
I added a createEffect function that configures your TestBed properly with the given actions$ mock and returns a new instance of SimpleEffects.
This instance can then be used to subscribe to its defined effects.
Related
I have a component and a Pinia store which contains a state and some actions. The code works perfectly fine in browser and in E2E (cypress) tests, but fail on unit tests. I'm using vue-testing-utils and vitest.
The store function can be called fine from the unit test when the button is clicked, but if the function is in the mounted or main script, it fails the test
src/components/UsersComponent.vue
<script setup>
import { onMounted } from 'vue'
import { useUsersStore } from '#/stores/users.store'
const usersStore = useUsersStore()
// usersStore.resetStatus() // <- This fails in the unit test
onMounted(() => {
usersStore.resetStatus() // <- This fails in the unit test
})
function changeStatus() {
usersStore.changeStatus() // <- This passes in the unit test
}
</script>
<template>
<div>
<p>Status: {{ usersStore.status }}</p>
<button #click="changeStatus()">Change Status</button>
</div>
</template>
src/stores/users.store.js
import { defineStore } from 'pinia'
import { usersAPI } from '#/gateways'
export const useUsersStore = defineStore({
id: 'users',
persist: true,
state: () => ({
status: 'ready',
}),
getters: {},
actions: {
resetStatus() {
this.status = 'ready'
},
changeStatus() {
this.status = 'loading'
},
},
})
src/components/tests/UsersComponent.spec.js
import { describe, it, expect, vi, beforeEach } from 'vitest'
import { mount } from '#vue/test-utils'
import { createTestingPinia } from '#pinia/testing'
import UsersComponent from '#/components/UsersComponent.vue'
import { useUsersStore } from '#/stores/users.store'
const wrapper = mount(UsersComponent, {
global: {
plugins: [createTestingPinia({ createSpy: vi.fn() })],
},
})
const usersStore = useUsersStore()
describe('UsersComponent', () => {
it('store function is called', async () => {
// arrange
const spy = vi.spyOn(usersStore, 'resetStatus')
const button = wrapper.find('button')
// act
await button.trigger('click')
// assert
expect(spy).toHaveBeenCalled()
})
})
The unit tests return 2 different error. The first is a console log when the function tries to run in onMounted() and the second is what vitest returns.
stderr | unknown test
[Vue warn]: Unhandled error during execution of mounted hook
at <UsersComponent ref="VTU_COMPONENT" >
at <VTUROOT>
FAIL src/components/__tests__/UsersComponent.spec.js [ src/components/__tests__/UsersComponent.spec.js ]
TypeError: usersStore.resetStatus is not a function
❯ src/components/UsersComponent.vue:16:14
16|
17| <template>
18| <div>
| ^
19| <p>Status: {{ usersStore.status }}</p>
20| <button #click="changeStatus()">Change Status</button>
I know this example is a little basic and doesn't really serve a purpose, but I'm wondering how I can have store functions inside the onMounted() (or similar places) without it breaking all my unit tests.
Maybe this can be useful to you:
describe('UsersComponent', () => {
it('changeStatus function is called', async () => {
const wrapper = mount(UsersComponent, {
mounted: vi.fn(), // With this you mock the onMounted
global: {
plugins: [createTestingPinia({
initialState: { // Initialize the state
users: { status: 'ready' },
}
})]
}
})
// Spy the method you call...
const spy = vi.spyOn(wrapper.vm, 'changeStatus');
wrapper.vm.changeStatus()
expect(spy).toHaveBeenCalled()
expect(spy).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1)
})
})
I want to create a test with Cypress that has a React component that uses an auth library (#okta/okta-react) with a HOC (withOktaAuth).
My component looks like this:
// Welcome.js
import { withOktaAuth } from '#okta/okta-react'
const Welcome = ({authState}) => {
return <div>{authState.isAuthenticated ? 'stubbed' : 'not working'}</div>
}
export default withOktaAuth(Welcome)
I tried to make a test like so:
// test.js
import * as OktaReact from '#okta/okta-react'
const withOktaAuthStub = Component => {
Component.defaultProps = {
...Component.defaultProps,
authState: {
isAuthenticated: true,
isPending: false
},
authService: {
accessToken: '123'
}
}
return Component
}
describe('Test auth', () => {
before(() => {
cy.stub(OktaReact, 'withOktaAuth').callsFake(withOktaAuthStub)
})
it('Stubs auth', () => {
cy.visit('/welcome')
cy.contains('stubbed')
})
})
When I run the test, the component still does not use the stubbed function. Any help is very much appreciated!
It's been 2 years that this questions was submitted, but for those who still encounters that error, Cypress provides a guide about Okta e2e testing: https://docs.cypress.io/guides/end-to-end-testing/okta-authentication#Adapting-the-back-end
I want to test that one of my ES6 modules calls another ES6 module in a particular way. With Jasmine this is super easy --
The application code:
// myModule.js
import dependency from './dependency';
export default (x) => {
dependency.doSomething(x * 2);
}
And the test code:
//myModule-test.js
import myModule from '../myModule';
import dependency from '../dependency';
describe('myModule', () => {
it('calls the dependency with double the input', () => {
spyOn(dependency, 'doSomething');
myModule(2);
expect(dependency.doSomething).toHaveBeenCalledWith(4);
});
});
What's the equivalent with Jest? I feel like this is such a simple thing to want to do, but I've been tearing my hair out trying to figure it out.
The closest I've come is by replacing the imports with requires, and moving them inside the tests/functions. Neither of which are things I want to do.
// myModule.js
export default (x) => {
const dependency = require('./dependency'); // Yuck
dependency.doSomething(x * 2);
}
//myModule-test.js
describe('myModule', () => {
it('calls the dependency with double the input', () => {
jest.mock('../dependency');
myModule(2);
const dependency = require('../dependency'); // Also yuck
expect(dependency.doSomething).toBeCalledWith(4);
});
});
For bonus points, I'd love to make the whole thing work when the function inside dependency.js is a default export. However, I know that spying on default exports doesn't work in Jasmine (or at least I could never get it to work), so I'm not holding out hope that it's possible in Jest either.
Edit: Several years have passed and this isn't really the right way to do this any more (and probably never was, my bad).
Mutating an imported module is nasty and can lead to side effects like tests that pass or fail depending on execution order.
I'm leaving this answer in its original form for historical purposes, but you should really use jest.spyOn or jest.mock. Refer to the jest docs or the other answers on this page for details.
Original answer follows:
I've been able to solve this by using a hack involving import *. It even works for both named and default exports!
For a named export:
// dependency.js
export const doSomething = (y) => console.log(y)
// myModule.js
import { doSomething } from './dependency';
export default (x) => {
doSomething(x * 2);
}
// myModule-test.js
import myModule from '../myModule';
import * as dependency from '../dependency';
describe('myModule', () => {
it('calls the dependency with double the input', () => {
dependency.doSomething = jest.fn(); // Mutate the named export
myModule(2);
expect(dependency.doSomething).toBeCalledWith(4);
});
});
Or for a default export:
// dependency.js
export default (y) => console.log(y)
// myModule.js
import dependency from './dependency'; // Note lack of curlies
export default (x) => {
dependency(x * 2);
}
// myModule-test.js
import myModule from '../myModule';
import * as dependency from '../dependency';
describe('myModule', () => {
it('calls the dependency with double the input', () => {
dependency.default = jest.fn(); // Mutate the default export
myModule(2);
expect(dependency.default).toBeCalledWith(4); // Assert against the default
});
});
You have to mock the module and set the spy by yourself:
import myModule from '../myModule';
import dependency from '../dependency';
jest.mock('../dependency', () => ({
doSomething: jest.fn()
}))
describe('myModule', () => {
it('calls the dependency with double the input', () => {
myModule(2);
expect(dependency.doSomething).toBeCalledWith(4);
});
});
Fast forwarding to 2020, I found this blog post to be the solution: Jest mock default and named export
Using only ES6 module syntax:
// esModule.js
export default 'defaultExport';
export const namedExport = () => {};
// esModule.test.js
jest.mock('./esModule', () => ({
__esModule: true, // this property makes it work
default: 'mockedDefaultExport',
namedExport: jest.fn(),
}));
import defaultExport, { namedExport } from './esModule';
defaultExport; // 'mockedDefaultExport'
namedExport; // mock function
Also one thing you need to know (which took me a while to figure out) is that you can't call jest.mock() inside the test; you must call it at the top level of the module. However, you can call mockImplementation() inside individual tests if you want to set up different mocks for different tests.
To mock an ES6 dependency module default export using Jest:
import myModule from '../myModule';
import dependency from '../dependency';
jest.mock('../dependency');
// If necessary, you can place a mock implementation like this:
dependency.mockImplementation(() => 42);
describe('myModule', () => {
it('calls the dependency once with double the input', () => {
myModule(2);
expect(dependency).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
expect(dependency).toHaveBeenCalledWith(4);
});
});
The other options didn't work for my case.
Adding more to Andreas' answer. I had the same problem with ES6 code, but I did not want to mutate the imports. That looked hacky. So I did this:
import myModule from '../myModule';
import dependency from '../dependency';
jest.mock('../dependency');
describe('myModule', () => {
it('calls the dependency with double the input', () => {
myModule(2);
});
});
And added file dependency.js in the " __ mocks __" folder parallel to file dependency.js. This worked for me. Also, this gave me the option to return suitable data from the mock implementation. Make sure you give the correct path to the module you want to mock.
The question is already answered, but you can resolve it like this:
File dependency.js
const doSomething = (x) => x
export default doSomething;
File myModule.js
import doSomething from "./dependency";
export default (x) => doSomething(x * 2);
File myModule.spec.js
jest.mock('../dependency');
import doSomething from "../dependency";
import myModule from "../myModule";
describe('myModule', () => {
it('calls the dependency with double the input', () => {
doSomething.mockImplementation((x) => x * 10)
myModule(2);
expect(doSomething).toHaveBeenCalledWith(4);
console.log(myModule(2)) // 40
});
});
None of the answers here seemed to work for me (the original function was always being imported rather than the mock), and it seems that ESM support in Jest is still work in progress.
After discovering this comment, I found out that jest.mock() does not actually work with regular imports, because the imports are always run before the mock (this is now also officially documented). Because of this, I am importing my dependencies using await import(). This even works with a top-level await, so I just have to adapt my imports:
import { describe, expect, it, jest } from '#jest/globals';
jest.unstable_mockModule('../dependency', () => ({
doSomething: jest.fn()
}));
const myModule = await import('../myModule');
const dependency = await import('../dependency');
describe('myModule', async () => {
it('calls the dependency with double the input', () => {
myModule(2);
expect(dependency.doSomething).toBeCalledWith(4);
});
});
I solved this another way. Let's say you have your dependency.js
export const myFunction = () => { }
I create a depdency.mock.js file besides it with the following content:
export const mockFunction = jest.fn();
jest.mock('dependency.js', () => ({ myFunction: mockFunction }));
And in the test, before I import the file that has the dependency, I use:
import { mockFunction } from 'dependency.mock'
import functionThatCallsDep from './tested-code'
it('my test', () => {
mockFunction.returnValue(false);
functionThatCallsDep();
expect(mockFunction).toHaveBeenCalled();
})
I tried all the solutions and none worked or were showing lots of TS errors.
This is how I solved it:
format.ts file:
import camelcaseKeys from 'camelcase-keys'
import parse from 'xml-parser'
class Format {
parseXml (xml: string) {
return camelcaseKeys(parse(xml), {
deep: true,
})
}
}
const format = new Format()
export { format }
format.test.ts file:
import format from './format'
import camelcaseKeys from 'camelcase-keys'
import parse from 'xml-parser'
jest.mock('xml-parser', () => jest.fn().mockReturnValue('parsed'))
jest.mock('camelcase-keys', () => jest.fn().mockReturnValue('camel cased'))
describe('parseXml', () => {
test('functions called', () => {
const result = format.parseXml('XML')
expect(parse).toHaveBeenCalledWith('XML')
expect(camelcaseKeys).toHaveBeenCalledWith('parsed', { deep: true })
expect(result).toBe('camel cased')
})
})
I made some modifications on #cam-jackson original answer and side effects has gone. I used lodash library to deep clone the object under test and then made any modification I want on that object. But be ware that cloning heavy objects can have negative impact on test performance and test speed.
objectUndertest.js
const objectUnderTest = {};
export default objectUnderTest;
objectUnderTest.myFunctionUnterTest = () => {
return "this is original function";
};
objectUndertest.test.js
import _ from "lodash";
import objectUndertest from "./objectUndertest.js";
describe("objectUndertest", () => {
let mockObject = objectUndertest;
beforeEach(() => {
mockObject = _.cloneDeep(objectUndertest);
});
test("test function", () => {
mockObject.myFunctionUnterTest = () => {
return "this is mocked function.";
};
expect(mockObject.myFunctionUnterTest()).toBe("this is mocked function.");
});
});
I'm trying to test a simple component, that looks like this
import React, { PureComponent } from 'react'
import PropTypes from 'prop-types'
import styles from './styles.css'
export class App extends PureComponent {
handleClick = (event) => {
const { loadGreetings } = this.props
loadGreetings()
}
render () {
const { hi } = this.props
return (
<section>
<h1 className={styles.earlyDawn}>{hi}</h1>
<button onClick={this.handleClick}>Handshake</button>
</section>
)
}
}
App.propTypes = {
hi: PropTypes.string,
loadGreetings: PropTypes.func
}
export default App
Here is my test file
import React from 'react'
import {App} from './index'
import {shallow} from 'Enzyme'
describe('Testing App container...', () => {
let props
beforeEach(() => {
props = {
loadGreetings: jest.fn().mockName('loadGreetings'),
hi: 'Hi from test'
}
})
test('should handle click on the button', () => {
const wrapper = shallow(<App {...props}/>)
const buttonHi = wrapper.find('button')
const instance = wrapper.instance()
expect(buttonHi.length).toBe(1)
jest.spyOn(instance, 'handleClick')
buttonHi.simulate('click')
expect(props.loadGreetings).toHaveBeenCalled()
expect(instance.handleClick).toHaveBeenCalled()
})
})
So the problem is in the second toHaveBeenCalled assertion that fails all the time. However, first toHaveBeenCalled seems to be working, which bothers me, because props.loadGreetings is called inside instance.handleClick. Could you please help me to find what may be the problem?
Dependencies: "react": "16.9.0", "react-dom": "16.9.0", "babel-jest": "^24.8.0", "enzyme": "^3.10.0", "jest": "^24.8.0",
A simpler approach would be to pass in some initial props and test your component based upon those initial props -- you'll also manipulate those props to add more assertions.
Here's a working example (click on the Tests tab to run the tests):
components/App/index.js
import React, { PureComponent } from "react";
import PropTypes from "prop-types";
class App extends PureComponent {
handleClick = () => {
this.props.loadGreetings();
};
render() {
const { message } = this.props;
return (
<section className="app">
<h1>{message}</h1>
<button onClick={this.handleClick}>Handshake</button>
</section>
);
}
}
App.propTypes = {
message: PropTypes.string,
loadGreetings: PropTypes.func
};
export default App;
components/App/App.test.js
import React from "react";
import { shallow } from "enzyme";
import App from "./index";
// define the passed in function here for easier testing below
const loadGreetings = jest.fn();
// initial props to pass into 'App'
const initProps = {
message: "hi",
loadGreetings
};
describe("Testing App container...", () => {
let wrapper;
beforeEach(() => {
// this resets the wrapper with initial props defined above
wrapper = shallow(<App {...initProps} />);
});
afterEach(() => {
// this clears any calls to the mocked function
// and thereby resets it
loadGreetings.mockClear();
});
it("renders without errors", () => {
expect(wrapper.find(".app").exists()).toBeTruthy();
expect(loadGreetings).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(0);
});
it("initially renders a 'hi' message and then a 'goodbye' message", () => {
expect(wrapper.find("h1").text()).toEqual("hi");
// manipulating the initial 'message' prop
wrapper.setProps({ message: "goodbye" });
expect(wrapper.find("h1").text()).toEqual("goodbye");
});
it("should call 'loadGreetings' when the 'Handshake' button is clicked", () => {
// since we passed in 'loadGreetings' as a jest function
// we expect it to be called when the 'Handshake' button is
// clicked
wrapper.find("button").simulate("click");
expect(loadGreetings).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
});
});
Not recommended (see below), but you can spy on the class method -- you'll have to work with instances, forceUpdate the instance, then invoke the handleClick method either manually, wrapper.instance().handleClick(), or indirectly via some element's event handler: wrapper.find("button").simulate("click") or wrapper.find("button").props().onClick().
The reason I don't recommend this testing strategy is that you're testing a React implementation (testing whether or not the element's event handler invokes your callback function). Instead, you can avoid that by asserting against whether or not a prop function is called and/or a prop/state change happens. This is a more standard and direct approach to testing the component -- as that is what we care about; we care that the props and/or state changes based upon some user action. In other words, by making assertions against the 'loadGreetings' prop being called we're already testing that the onClick event handler works.
Working example:
App.test.js (same testing as above, with the exception of this test):
it("should call 'loadGreetings' when the 'Handshake' button is clicked", () => {
const spy = jest.spyOn(wrapper.instance(), "handleClick"); // spying on the method class
wrapper.instance().forceUpdate(); // required to ensure the spy is placed on the method
wrapper.find("button").simulate("click");
expect(spy).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
const mockedFn = jest.fn(); // setting the method as a mocked fn()
wrapper.instance().handleClick = mockedFn;
wrapper.instance().forceUpdate(); // required to update the method instance with a mocked fn
wrapper.find("button").simulate("click");
expect(mockedFn).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
});
I have a React Native component which communicates with a custom iOS class, so I make use of NativeModules en NativeEventEmitter to send commands to and receive commands from the native code.
import {NativeModules, NativeEventEmitter} from 'react-native';
/* inside the constructor I do some setup: */
const { NetworkManager } = NativeModules;
const emitter = new NativeEventEmitter(NetworkManager);
/* here I subscribe to an event from the emitter */
public startDiscovery() {
const deviceFoundSubscription = this._emitter.addListener(
"DeviceDiscovered",
(device) => this.deviceFound(device)
);
this.NetworkManager.startDiscovery();
}
This code works just fine, but now I wanted to write some tests with Jest and this is where I am stuck. How would I go ahead to write a test for the event listener? I want to simulate a DeviceDiscovered event in a Jest test, and then assert that the listener is called.
To solve my problem I have mocked RCTDeviceEventEmitter by using an everyday JS EventEmitter:
const EventEmitter = require('EventEmitter');
const RCTDeviceEventEmitter = require('RCTDeviceEventEmitter');
/**
* Mock the NativeEventEmitter as a normal JS EventEmitter.
*/
export class NativeEventEmitter extends EventEmitter {
constructor() {
super(RCTDeviceEventEmitter.sharedSubscriber);
}
}
Than in my setupFile for jest I imported the mock to replace the react-native implementation.
import NativeEventEmitter from './__mocks__/nativeEventEmitter';
import { NativeModules } from 'react-native';
// Mock for my native module where I create a spy for the methods
const mockNativeModules = {
NetworkManager: {
startDiscovery: jest.fn(),
stopDiscovery: jest.fn(),
connectToHost: jest.fn(),
sendMessage: jest.fn()
}
};
// Mock every native module you use
Object.keys(mockNativeModules).forEach((module => {
jest.doMock(module, () => mockNativeModules[module], { virtual:true });
}));
jest.doMock('NativeModules', () => mockNativeModules);
jest.mock('NativeEventEmitter');
And than finally my actual test code:
import {
NativeModules,
NativeEventEmitter,
} from 'react-native';
import { DiscoveryService } from '/services/discoveryService';
import { device1, device2 } from './../fixtures/devices';
const nativeEventEmitter = new NativeEventEmitter();
describe('Discovery Service', () => {
beforeEach(() => {
discoveryService.deviceDiscovered = jest.fn();
discoveryService.startDiscovery();
});
test('Should call startDiscovery on Native Module NetworkManager', () => {
nativeEventEmitter.emit('DeviceDiscovered', device);
expect(NativeModules.NetworkManager.startDiscovery).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
expect(discoveryService.serverFound).toHaveBeenCalledWith(device1);
});
test('Should handle multiple discoveries', () => {
nativeEventEmitter.emit('DeviceDiscovered', device1);
expect(discoveryService.serverFound).toHaveBeenCalledWith(device1);
nativeEventEmitter.emit('DeviceDiscovered', device2)
expect(discoveryService.deviceFound).toHaveBeenCalledWith(device2);
});
});
in your jest/setup.js
add your relative path:
jest.mock(
'../node_modules/react-native/Libraries/EventEmitter/NativeEventEmitter',
);
jest.mock('react-native/Libraries/EventEmitter/NativeEventEmitter.js', () => {
const { EventEmitter } = require('events');
return EventEmitter;
});