I have found this error while trying to build another React app. So I am only asking the main issue here in a demo app, I might not be able to change any rendering methods here since it is not the actual project.
Issue in simplified form -> I was building a app where two count will be shown and a + button will be there next to that count value. When the button is clicked the count should be increased by 1. Unfortunately when I try to click on the button the value is increasing only the first time. After that the value is not even changing. But when I am implementing the same using Class component its working as expected.
Functional Component
import React, { useState } from "react";
function Page(props) {
const [count, setCount] = useState(0);
const [content, setContent] = useState({
button: (value) => {
return <button onClick={() => handlePlus(value)}>+</button>;
},
});
function handlePlus(value) {
console.log("value=", value);
const data = count + 1;
setCount((count) => data);
}
return (
<div>
<span>Functional Component Count = {count}</span>
{content.button(10)} // 10 will be replaced with another variable
</div>
);
}
export default Page;
Class Component
import React, { Component } from "react";
class PageClass extends Component {
state = {
count: 0,
content: {
button: (value) => {
return (
<button onClick={() => this.handlePlus(value)}>+</button>
);
},
},
};
handlePlus = (value) => {
console.log("value=", value);
this.setState({ count: this.state.count + 1 });
};
render() {
return (
<div>
<span>Class Component Count = {this.state.count}</span>
{this.state.content.button(10)} // 10 will be replaced with another variable
</div>
);
}
}
export default PageClass;
App.js
import "./App.css";
import Page from "./components/Page";
import PageClass from "./components/PageClass";
function App() {
return (
<div className="App">
<Page />
<PageClass />
</div>
);
}
export default App;
However, If I replace that content state variable with normal const variable type and it is working as expected.
Below is working when I am not using any hooks to render the button.
But this is not helpful for my case.
const content = {
content: () => {
console.log(count);
return <button onClick={() => handlePlus(value)}>+</button>;
},
};
I was trying to create some re-usable components and hence I wanted to have that function in state variable which return button tag, so that I can implements some other logic there.
The value will be missing since you're passing a hard-coded 10.
I'd recommend simplifying the handlePlus to just:
setCount(c => c + 1);
Then set the onclick like so:
<button onClick={handlePlus}>+</button>
And your code will work as expected as you can see in this snippet:
const { useState } = React;
const Example = () => {
const [count, setCount] = useState(0);
const [content, setContent] = useState({
content: (value) => {
return <button onClick={handlePlus}>+</button>;
},
});
function handlePlus(value) {
setCount(c => c + 1);
}
return (
<div>
<span>{count}</span>
{content.content(10)}
</div>
);
}
ReactDOM.render(<Example />, document.getElementById("react"));
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/react/17.0.1/umd/react.production.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/react-dom/17.0.1/umd/react-dom.production.min.js"></script>
<div id="react"></div>
That said, I'd recommend removing the button from the hook, and just render it yourself:
const { useState } = React;
const Example = () => {
const [count, setCount] = useState(0);
function handlePlus(value) {
setCount(c => c + 1);
}
return (
<div>
<span>{count}</span>
<button onClick={handlePlus}>+</button>
</div>
);
}
ReactDOM.render(<Example />, document.getElementById("react"));
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/react/17.0.1/umd/react.production.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/react-dom/17.0.1/umd/react-dom.production.min.js"></script>
<div id="react"></div>
See React documentation about the c => c + 1 syntax
I am using useref to display dynamic content
let refValue= useRef(null);
When there is new data, the data is getting overlapped with old data which has to be cleared, but the old data is still retaining with ref, how do i overcome this and clear the old data
Since refs do not notify when it changes you can use a callback.
Documentation: useRef Documentation
Here is an example using a callback.
Bear in mind that you probably don't need to pass the dependency in the callback, in the example I did it to force the change.
const {
useState,
useEffect,
useCallback,
} = React;
const CompWithRef = ({title}) => {
const [myRef, setRef] = useState(null);
const myRefCallback = useCallback(node => {
if (node !== null) {
setRef(title);
}
}, [title]);
return (
<div>
<p ref={myRefCallback}>Prop title = {title} </p>
<p>When your ref changes update state, ref state value = {myRef}</p>
</div>)
};
const Example = () => {
const [title, setTitle] = useState('initial title');
setTimeout(function(){ setTitle("Title is updated"); }, 3000);
return (
<CompWithRef title={title}/>
);
};
ReactDOM.render( <Example /> ,
document.getElementById("react")
);
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/react/17.0.1/umd/react.production.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/react-dom/17.0.1/umd/react-dom.production.min.js"></script>
<div id="react"></div>
I have a modern react application using the context api and many hooks, i use the context to store global values for my application, this values or the context itself should never directly re-render other components, the context itself has a its own getter/setter in form of the UseState hook/s which is what is called from the consumer components to be used, if any component is dependent on the context data a separate state in this component itself is created and state is then being properly handled.
My concrete question in my case how bad is it to directly mutate the object i have stored in the context?
for example from any random consumer component changing the context object as follows:
const handlerFunction = () => {contextObjData.value = "Something"};
Instead of the "intended" react way:
const handlerFunction = () => {setContextObjData(...contextObjData, value: "Something")};
To me it seems overkill to each time save the entire object again but maybe someone can give me another perspective and some insights.
Side question kind of nooby but i am not sure, is there a difference between these two:
const handlerFunction = () => {setContextObjData(...contextObjData, value: "Something")};
const handlerFunction = () => {setContextObjData(prevState => ({...contextObjData, value: "Something"}));
A state change will trigger a render. When you mutate something then React won't detect that the state has changed and will not re render.
The handlerFunction examples matter only if you want to optimize it using useCallback but the way you do it it is broken either way (syntax error and not using prevState in the second example).
//handlerFunction will be re created every render
const handlerFunction = () =>
setContextObjData({
...contextObjData,
value: 'Something',
});
//handler function will only be created on mount
const optimizedHandler = React.useCallback(
() =>
setContextObjData((prevState) => ({
...prevState,
value: 'Something',
})),
[] //empty dependency, only create optimizedHandler on mount
);
//broken handler, using stale closure will give you liner warning
const brokenHandler = React.useCallback(
() =>
//callback only used on mount so has contextObjData
// as it was when mounted (stale closure)
setContextObjData({
...contextObjData, //needs contextObjData in closure scope
value: 'Something',
}),
[] //empty dependency, but contextObjData will be a stale closure
);
Pure components will only re render when props change, state change or return value from useSelector or useContext change.
When you pass a callback as a prop to a child and your component re renders without the child needing to re render you can optimize a passed callback with useCallback so the child doesn't get needlessly re rendered:
//Child is a pure component
const Child = React.memo(function Increment({ increment }) {
const r = React.useRef(0);
r.current++;
return (
<button onClick={increment}>
rendered: {r.current} times, click to increment
</button>
);
});
const Parent = () => {
const [count, setCount] = React.useState(1);
const increment = React.useCallback(
() => setCount((c) => c + 1),
[]
);
React.useEffect(() => {
const t = setInterval(() => increment(), 1000);
return () => clearInterval(t);
}, [increment]);
return (
<div>
<h4>{count}</h4>
<Child increment={increment} />
</div>
);
};
ReactDOM.render(
<Parent />,
document.getElementById('root')
);
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/react/16.8.4/umd/react.production.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/react-dom/16.8.4/umd/react-dom.production.min.js"></script>
<div id="root"></div>
Here is an example how mutation will break re rendering:
const CounterContext = React.createContext();
const CounterProvider = ({ children }) => {
console.log('render counter provider');
const [c, setC] = React.useState({ count: 0 });
const increment = React.useCallback(
() =>
setC((c) => {
console.log('broken:', c.count);
c.count++;
return c;
}), //broken, context users never re render
[]
);
return (
<CounterContext.Provider value={[c, increment]}>
{children}
</CounterContext.Provider>
);
};
const App = () => {
console.log('render App');
const [count, increment] = React.useContext(
CounterContext
);
return (
<div>
<h4>count: {count.count}</h4>
<button onClick={increment}>+</button>
</div>
);
};
ReactDOM.render(
<CounterProvider>
<App />
</CounterProvider>,
document.getElementById('root')
);
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/react/16.8.4/umd/react.production.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/react-dom/16.8.4/umd/react-dom.production.min.js"></script>
<div id="root"></div>
Consider this basic form fields component with a custom form hook to handle input changes:
import React, { useState, useCallback } from 'react';
const useFormInputs = (initialState = {})=> {
const [values, setValues] = useState(initialState);
const handleChange = useCallback(({ target: { name, value } }) => {
setValues(prev => ({ ...prev, [name]: value }));
}, []);
const resetFields = useCallback(() =>
setValues(initialState), [initialState]);
return [values, handleChange, resetFields];
};
const formFields = [
{ name: 'text', placeholder: 'Enter text...', type: 'text', text: 'Text' },
{ name: 'amount', placeholder: 'Enter Amount...', type: 'number',
text: 'Amount (negative - expense, positive - income)' }
];
export const AddTransaction = () => {
const [values, handleChange, resetFields] = useFormInputs({
text: '', amount: ''
});
return <>
<h3>Add new transaction</h3>
<form>
{formFields.map(({ text, name, ...attributes }) => {
const inputProps = { ...attributes, name };
return <div key={name} className="form-control">
<label htmlFor={name}>{text}</label>
<input {...inputProps} value={values[name]}
onChange={handleChange} />
</div>;
})}
<button className="btn">Add transaction</button>
</form>
<button className="btn" onClick={resetFields}>Reset fields</button>
</>;
};
Is there really any reason / advantage for me to use useCallback to cache the function in my custom hook? I read the docs, but I just coudln't grasp the idea behind this usage of useCallback. How exactly it memoizes the function between renders? How exactly does ti work, and should I use it?
Inside the same custom hook, you can see the new values state being updated by spreading the previous state and creating a new object like so: setValues(prev => ({ ...prev, [name]: value }));
Would there be any difference if I did this instead? setValues({ ...prev, [name]: value })
as far as I can tell, doesn't look like it has any difference right? I am simply accessing the state directly.. Am I wrong?
Your first question:
In your case it doesn't matter because everything is rendered in the same component. If you have a list of things that get an event handler then useCallback can save you some renders.
In the example below the first 2 items are rendered with an onClick that is re created every time App re renders. This will not only cause the Items to re render it will also cause virtual DOM compare to fail and React will re create the Itms in the DOM (expensive operation).
The last 2 items get an onClick that is created when App mounts and not re created when App re renders so they will never re render.
const { useState, useCallback, useRef, memo } = React;
const Item = memo(function Item({ onClick, id }) {
const rendered = useRef(0);
rendered.current++;
return (
<button _id={id} onClick={onClick}>
{id} : rendered {rendered.current} times
</button>
);
});
const App = () => {
const [message, setMessage] = useState('');
const onClick = (e) =>
setMessage(
'last clicked' + e.target.getAttribute('_id')
);
const memOnClick = useCallback(onClick, []);
return (
<div>
<h3>{message}</h3>
{[1, 2].map((id) => (
<Item key={id} id={id} onClick={onClick} />
))}
{[1, 2].map((id) => (
<Item key={id} id={id} onClick={memOnClick} />
))}
</div>
);
};
ReactDOM.render(<App />, document.getElementById('root'));
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/react/16.8.4/umd/react.production.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/react-dom/16.8.4/umd/react-dom.production.min.js"></script>
<div id="root"></div>
Another example is when you want to call a function in an effect that also needs to be called outside of the effect so you can't put the function inside the effect. You only want to run the effect when a certain value changes so you can do something like this.
//fetchById is (re) created when ID changes
const fetchById = useCallback(
() => console.log('id is', ID),
[ID]
);
//effect is run when fetchById changes so basically
// when ID changes
useEffect(() => fetchById(), [fetchById]);
Your second question:
The setValues({ ...prev, [name]: value }) will give you an error because you never defined pref but if you meant: setValues({ ...values, [name]: value }) and wrap the handler in a useCallback then now your callback has a dependency on values and will be needlessly be re created whenever values change.
If you don't provide the dependency then the linter will warn you and you end up with a stale closure. Here is an example of the stale closure as counter.count will never go up because you never re create onClick after the first render thus the counter closure will always be {count:1}.
const { useState, useCallback, useRef } = React;
const App = () => {
const [counts, setCounts] = useState({ count: 1 });
const rendered = useRef(0);
rendered.current++;
const onClick = useCallback(
//this function is never re created so counts.count is always 1
// every time it'll do setCount(1+1) so after the first
// click this "stops working"
() => setCounts({ count: counts.count + 1 }),
[] //linter warns of missing dependency count
);
return (
<button onClick={onClick}>
count: {counts.count} rendered:{rendered.current}
</button>
);
};
ReactDOM.render(<App />, document.getElementById('root'));
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/react/16.8.4/umd/react.production.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/react-dom/16.8.4/umd/react-dom.production.min.js"></script>
<div id="root"></div>
According to the docs:
componentDidUpdate() is invoked immediately after updating occurs. This method is not called for the initial render.
We can use the new useEffect() hook to simulate componentDidUpdate(), but it seems like useEffect() is being ran after every render, even the first time. How do I get it to not run on initial render?
As you can see in the example below, componentDidUpdateFunction is printed during the initial render but componentDidUpdateClass was not printed during the initial render.
function ComponentDidUpdateFunction() {
const [count, setCount] = React.useState(0);
React.useEffect(() => {
console.log("componentDidUpdateFunction");
});
return (
<div>
<p>componentDidUpdateFunction: {count} times</p>
<button
onClick={() => {
setCount(count + 1);
}}
>
Click Me
</button>
</div>
);
}
class ComponentDidUpdateClass extends React.Component {
constructor(props) {
super(props);
this.state = {
count: 0,
};
}
componentDidUpdate() {
console.log("componentDidUpdateClass");
}
render() {
return (
<div>
<p>componentDidUpdateClass: {this.state.count} times</p>
<button
onClick={() => {
this.setState({ count: this.state.count + 1 });
}}
>
Click Me
</button>
</div>
);
}
}
ReactDOM.render(
<div>
<ComponentDidUpdateFunction />
<ComponentDidUpdateClass />
</div>,
document.querySelector("#app")
);
<script src="https://unpkg.com/react#16.7.0-alpha.0/umd/react.development.js"></script>
<script src="https://unpkg.com/react-dom#16.7.0-alpha.0/umd/react-dom.development.js"></script>
<div id="app"></div>
We can use the useRef hook to store any mutable value we like, so we could use that to keep track of if it's the first time the useEffect function is being run.
If we want the effect to run in the same phase that componentDidUpdate does, we can use useLayoutEffect instead.
Example
const { useState, useRef, useLayoutEffect } = React;
function ComponentDidUpdateFunction() {
const [count, setCount] = useState(0);
const firstUpdate = useRef(true);
useLayoutEffect(() => {
if (firstUpdate.current) {
firstUpdate.current = false;
return;
}
console.log("componentDidUpdateFunction");
});
return (
<div>
<p>componentDidUpdateFunction: {count} times</p>
<button
onClick={() => {
setCount(count + 1);
}}
>
Click Me
</button>
</div>
);
}
ReactDOM.render(
<ComponentDidUpdateFunction />,
document.getElementById("app")
);
<script src="https://unpkg.com/react#16.7.0-alpha.0/umd/react.development.js"></script>
<script src="https://unpkg.com/react-dom#16.7.0-alpha.0/umd/react-dom.development.js"></script>
<div id="app"></div>
You can turn it into custom hooks, like so:
import React, { useEffect, useRef } from 'react';
const useDidMountEffect = (func, deps) => {
const didMount = useRef(false);
useEffect(() => {
if (didMount.current) func();
else didMount.current = true;
}, deps);
}
export default useDidMountEffect;
Usage example:
import React, { useState, useEffect } from 'react';
import useDidMountEffect from '../path/to/useDidMountEffect';
const MyComponent = (props) => {
const [state, setState] = useState({
key: false
});
useEffect(() => {
// you know what is this, don't you?
}, []);
useDidMountEffect(() => {
// react please run me if 'key' changes, but not on initial render
}, [state.key]);
return (
<div>
...
</div>
);
}
// ...
I made a simple useFirstRender hook to handle cases like focussing a form input:
import { useRef, useEffect } from 'react';
export function useFirstRender() {
const firstRender = useRef(true);
useEffect(() => {
firstRender.current = false;
}, []);
return firstRender.current;
}
It starts out as true, then switches to false in the useEffect, which only runs once, and never again.
In your component, use it:
const firstRender = useFirstRender();
const phoneNumberRef = useRef(null);
useEffect(() => {
if (firstRender || errors.phoneNumber) {
phoneNumberRef.current.focus();
}
}, [firstRender, errors.phoneNumber]);
For your case, you would just use if (!firstRender) { ....
Same approach as Tholle's answer, but using useState instead of useRef.
const [skipCount, setSkipCount] = useState(true);
...
useEffect(() => {
if (skipCount) setSkipCount(false);
if (!skipCount) runYourFunction();
}, [dependencies])
EDIT
While this also works, it involves updating state which will cause your component to re-render. If all your component's useEffect calls (and also all of its children's) have a dependency array, this doesn't matter. But keep in mind that any useEffect without a dependency array (useEffect(() => {...}) will be run again.
Using and updating useRef will not cause any re-renders.
#ravi, yours doesn't call the passed-in unmount function. Here's a version that's a little more complete:
/**
* Identical to React.useEffect, except that it never runs on mount. This is
* the equivalent of the componentDidUpdate lifecycle function.
*
* #param {function:function} effect - A useEffect effect.
* #param {array} [dependencies] - useEffect dependency list.
*/
export const useEffectExceptOnMount = (effect, dependencies) => {
const mounted = React.useRef(false);
React.useEffect(() => {
if (mounted.current) {
const unmount = effect();
return () => unmount && unmount();
} else {
mounted.current = true;
}
}, dependencies);
// Reset on unmount for the next mount.
React.useEffect(() => {
return () => mounted.current = false;
}, []);
};
a simple way is to create a let, out of your component and set in to true.
then say if its true set it to false then return (stop) the useEffect function
like that:
import { useEffect} from 'react';
//your let must be out of component to avoid re-evaluation
let isFirst = true
function App() {
useEffect(() => {
if(isFirst){
isFirst = false
return
}
//your code that don't want to execute at first time
},[])
return (
<div>
<p>its simple huh...</p>
</div>
);
}
its Similar to #Carmine Tambasciabs solution but without using state :)
function useEffectAfterMount(effect, deps) {
const isMounted = useRef(false);
useEffect(() => {
if (isMounted.current) return effect();
else isMounted.current = true;
}, deps);
// reset on unmount; in React 18, components can mount again
useEffect(() => {
isMounted.current = false;
});
}
We need to return what comes back from effect(), because it might be a cleanup function. But we don't need to determine if it is or not. Just pass it on and let useEffect figure it out.
In an earlier version of this post I said resetting the ref (isMounted.current = false) wasn't necessary. But in React 18 it is, because components can remount with their previous state (thanks #Whatabrain).
I thought creating a custom hook would be overkill and I didn't want to muddle my component's readability by using the useLayoutEffect hook for something unrelated to layouts, so, in my case, I simply checked to see if the value of my stateful variable selectedItem that triggers the useEffect callback is its original value in order to determine if it's the initial render:
export default function MyComponent(props) {
const [selectedItem, setSelectedItem] = useState(null);
useEffect(() => {
if(!selectedItem) return; // If selected item is its initial value (null), don't continue
//... This will not happen on initial render
}, [selectedItem]);
// ...
}
This is the best implementation I've created so far using typescript. Basically, the idea is the same, using the Ref but I'm also considering the callback returned by useEffect to perform cleanup on component unmount.
import {
useRef,
EffectCallback,
DependencyList,
useEffect
} from 'react';
/**
* #param effect
* #param dependencies
*
*/
export default function useNoInitialEffect(
effect: EffectCallback,
dependencies?: DependencyList
) {
//Preserving the true by default as initial render cycle
const initialRender = useRef(true);
useEffect(() => {
let effectReturns: void | (() => void) = () => {};
// Updating the ref to false on the first render, causing
// subsequent render to execute the effect
if (initialRender.current) {
initialRender.current = false;
} else {
effectReturns = effect();
}
// Preserving and allowing the Destructor returned by the effect
// to execute on component unmount and perform cleanup if
// required.
if (effectReturns && typeof effectReturns === 'function') {
return effectReturns;
}
return undefined;
}, dependencies);
}
You can simply use it, as usual as you use the useEffect hook but this time, it won't run on the initial render. Here is how you can use this hook.
useNoInitialEffect(() => {
// perform something, returning callback is supported
}, [a, b]);
If you use ESLint and want to use the react-hooks/exhaustive-deps rule for this custom hook:
{
"rules": {
// ...
"react-hooks/exhaustive-deps": ["warn", {
"additionalHooks": "useNoInitialEffect"
}]
}
}
#MehdiDehghani, your solution work perfectly fine, one addition you have to do is on unmount, reset the didMount.current value to false. When to try to use this custom hook somewhere else, you don't get cache value.
import React, { useEffect, useRef } from 'react';
const useDidMountEffect = (func, deps) => {
const didMount = useRef(false);
useEffect(() => {
let unmount;
if (didMount.current) unmount = func();
else didMount.current = true;
return () => {
didMount.current = false;
unmount && unmount();
}
}, deps);
}
export default useDidMountEffect;
Simplified implementation
import { useRef, useEffect } from 'react';
function MyComp(props) {
const firstRender = useRef(true);
useEffect(() => {
if (firstRender.current) {
firstRender.current = false;
} else {
myProp = 'some val';
};
}, [props.myProp])
return (
<div>
...
</div>
)
}
You can use custom hook to run use effect after mount.
const useEffectAfterMount = (cb, dependencies) => {
const mounted = useRef(true);
useEffect(() => {
if (!mounted.current) {
return cb();
}
mounted.current = false;
}, dependencies); // eslint-disable-line react-hooks/exhaustive-deps
};
Here is the typescript version:
const useEffectAfterMount = (cb: EffectCallback, dependencies: DependencyList | undefined) => {
const mounted = useRef(true);
useEffect(() => {
if (!mounted.current) {
return cb();
}
mounted.current = false;
}, dependencies); // eslint-disable-line react-hooks/exhaustive-deps
};
For people who are having trouble with React 18 strict mode calling the useeffect on the initial render twice, try this:
// The init variable is necessary if your state is an object/array, because the == operator compares the references, not the actual values.
const init = [];
const [state, setState] = useState(init);
const dummyState = useRef(init);
useEffect(() => {
// Compare the old state with the new state
if (dummyState.current == state) {
// This means that the component is mounting
} else {
// This means that the component updated.
dummyState.current = state;
}
}, [state]);
Works in development mode...
function App() {
const init = [];
const [state, setState] = React.useState(init);
const dummyState = React.useRef(init);
React.useEffect(() => {
if (dummyState.current == state) {
console.log('mount');
} else {
console.log('update');
dummyState.current = state;
}
}, [state]);
return (
<button onClick={() => setState([...state, Math.random()])}>Update state </button>
);
}
ReactDOM.createRoot(document.getElementById("app")).render(
<React.StrictMode>
<App />
</React.StrictMode>
);
<script crossorigin src="https://unpkg.com/react#18/umd/react.development.js"></script>
<script crossorigin src="https://unpkg.com/react-dom#18/umd/react-dom.development.js"></script>
<div id="app"></div>
And in production.
function App() {
const init = [];
const [state, setState] = React.useState(init);
const dummyState = React.useRef(init);
React.useEffect(() => {
if (dummyState.current == state) {
console.log('mount');
} else {
console.log('update');
dummyState.current = state;
}
}, [state]);
return (
<button onClick={() => setState([...state, Math.random()])}>Update state </button>
);
}
ReactDOM.createRoot(document.getElementById("app")).render(
<React.StrictMode>
<App />
</React.StrictMode>
);
<script crossorigin src="https://unpkg.com/react#18/umd/react.production.min.js"></script>
<script crossorigin src="https://unpkg.com/react-dom#18/umd/react-dom.production.min.js"></script>
<div id="app"></div>
If you want to skip the first render, you can create a state "firstRenderDone" and set it to true in the useEffect with empty dependecy list (that works like a didMount). Then, in your other useEffect, you can check if the first render was already done before doing something.
const [firstRenderDone, setFirstRenderDone] = useState(false);
//useEffect with empty dependecy list (that works like a componentDidMount)
useEffect(() => {
setFirstRenderDone(true);
}, []);
// your other useEffect (that works as componetDidUpdate)
useEffect(() => {
if(firstRenderDone){
console.log("componentDidUpdateFunction");
}
}, [firstRenderDone]);
All previous are good, but this can be achieved in a simplier way considering that the action in useEffect can be "skipped" placing an if condition(or any other ) that is basically not run first time, and still with the dependency.
For example I had the case of :
Load data from an API but my title has to be "Loading" till the date were not there, so I have an array, tours that is empty at beginning and show the text "Showing"
Have a component rendered with different information from those API.
The user can delete one by one those info, even all making the tour array empty again as the beginning but this time the API fetch is been already done
Once the tour list is empty by deleting then show another title.
so my "solution" was to create another useState to create a boolean value that change only after the data fetch making another condition in useEffect true in order to run another function that also depend on the tour length.
useEffect(() => {
if (isTitle) {
changeTitle(newTitle)
}else{
isSetTitle(true)
}
}, [tours])
here my App.js
import React, { useState, useEffect } from 'react'
import Loading from './Loading'
import Tours from './Tours'
const url = 'API url'
let newTours
function App() {
const [loading, setLoading ] = useState(true)
const [tours, setTours] = useState([])
const [isTitle, isSetTitle] = useState(false)
const [title, setTitle] = useState("Our Tours")
const newTitle = "Tours are empty"
const removeTours = (id) => {
newTours = tours.filter(tour => ( tour.id !== id))
return setTours(newTours)
}
const changeTitle = (title) =>{
if(tours.length === 0 && loading === false){
setTitle(title)
}
}
const fetchTours = async () => {
setLoading(true)
try {
const response = await fetch(url)
const tours = await response.json()
setLoading(false)
setTours(tours)
}catch(error) {
setLoading(false)
console.log(error)
}
}
useEffect(()=>{
fetchTours()
},[])
useEffect(() => {
if (isTitle) {
changeTitle(newTitle)
}else{
isSetTitle(true)
}
}, [tours])
if(loading){
return (
<main>
<Loading />
</main>
)
}else{
return (
<main>
<Tours tours={tours} title={title} changeTitle={changeTitle}
removeTours={removeTours} />
</main>
)
}
}
export default App
const [dojob, setDojob] = useState(false);
yourfunction(){
setDojob(true);
}
useEffect(()=>{
if(dojob){
yourfunction();
setDojob(false);
}
},[dojob]);