Develop Reference

Performing the same operation on multiple selectors, elegantly?

On the project I'm working on, I've been writing a little JavaScript object. One of its behaviors involve removing any children in a series of classes, as such:
function Foo () {
var $a = $('.a'),
$b = $('.b'),
// ...etc...
$n = $('.n');
$a.remove();
$b.remove();
// ...etc again...
$n.remove();
}
While there are some ways to revise this to be more easily maintainable (putting the selectors into a single array springs instantly to mind), I'm wondering if there's any elegant way to perform the .remove() operation on a series of selectors, as such:
function FooPrime() {
var selectors = [
'.a',
'.b',
// ...
'.n'
];
// Perform remove on all given selectors?
$(selectors).remove();
}
Thus, Question: What are some ways I could perform a single jQuery operation on a number of selectors?
EDIT: here is a JSFiddle to show a cut-down version of the problem context.

You can separate the selectors with commas:
$(selectors.join(',')).remove();
The comma has that purpose in straight ordinary CSS selector syntax.

Thanks for showing your DOM, you should avoid making big lists of classes to select when you can add multiple classes to elements and create a specific class for the elements you want to target... or target via association to other elements. This would be a more clean and efficient way to do it.
By association
Basically for the selector I just have this:
$("#test-callout").find("div").not(".callout-main").remove();
Fiddle
This assumes that you do not have any other div's besides .callout-main and the target div in test-callout. If you do you can modify the selector chain a bit to compensate.
By adding another class
Your arrow creation code was like this:
function calculateArrow() {
var arrowClass;
if(pub.isLeft) {
arrowClass = 'callout-arrow-left';
} else {
arrowClass = 'callout-arrow-right';
}
pub.$callout.append('<div class="' + arrowClass + '"></div>');
}
Modify it to be like this:
function calculateArrow() {
$arrow = $("<div>")
.addClass("callout-arrow")
.addClass(pub.isLeft ? "callout-arrow-left" : "callout-arrow-right");
pub.$callout.append($arrow);
}
Then your selector can be simply:
$("#test-callout").find(".callout-arrow").remove();
Fiddle
If you are interested in a complete refactor - I reduced your CalloutObject from 53 to 17 lines and it still works the same.
Fiddle

jquery selector for multiple classes

I have elements in my DOM with class="LiveVal:variablepart" and i would like to write a JQuery selector that works even if the elements have other classes on tom of the above. Eg. class="header LiveVal:varablepart" or class="LiveVal:varablepart header".
It works fro me if LiveVal is the first class with:
$('[class^=LiveVal:]').each(function ( intIndex ) { somefunction });
but obviously not if another class is before LiveVal.
In the function I need to extract the variable part. I planned to do like this:
theclass = $( this ).attr('class');
varpart = theclass.replace('\bLiveVal:(.+?)[\s]', '$1');
..but alas, it doesn't match. I've tested the regex on http://gskinner.com/RegExr/ where it seems to work, but it doesn't in javascript !?
Any help would be greatly appreciated.

This will check if a class name contains 'LiveVal:'
$('[class*=LiveVal:]').each(function ( intIndex ) { somefunction });
EDIT
did not realise you had that requirement (although a good one). You can do this instead: $('[class^="LiveVal:"], [class*=" LiveVal:"]')
Here is a fiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/wY8Mh/

It might be somewhat faster to do this with an explicit filter:
$("*").filter(function() { return /\bLiveVal:/.test(this.className); }).something();
It depends on whether the native "querySelectorAll" does the work, and does it quickly. This also would avoid the "FooLiveVal" problem.
It's worth noting that in an HTML5 world, it might be better to use a "data-LiveVal" attribute to store that "variable part" information on your elements. Then you could just say:
$('[data-LiveVal]').something();
In the HTML, it'd look like this:
<div class='whatever' data-LiveVal='variable part'>
Since version 1.5, jQuery will fetch stuff in a "data-foo" attribute when you pass the tail of the attribute (the part after "data-") to the ".data()" method:
var variablePart = $(this).data('LiveVal');
The ".data()" method will not, however, update the "data-foo" property when you store a new "variable part".
edit — if you want the value that's stuffed into the class after your property name prefix ("LivaVal:"), you can extract it like this:
var rLiveVal = /\bLiveVal:(\S*)\b/;
$('*').filter(function() { return rLiveVal.test(this.className); }).each(function() {
var variablePart = rLiveVal.exec(this.className)[1];
//
// ... do something ...
//
});
(or some variation on that theme).

Help me implementing addClassName in my JavaScript project the right way

I find myself often needing addClassName and removeClassName functions for Elements. However, I dare not to extend the native Element due to potential collisions. So, now I am wondering what to do.
I took a look at ExtJS, and it achieves this like:
var element = document.getElementById('...');
var elem = new Ext.Element(element);
elem.addClass('something');
I like the idea of not extending the native Element here, but I do not really like the idea of wrapping the element so hard over a custom object, because now I can't do several things like setAttribute easily, for example:
var element = document.getElementById('...');
var elem = new Ext.Element(element);
elem.addClass('something');
elem.setAttribute('src', '...'); // Fails
However, I could do:
var element = document.getElementById('...');
element.setAttribute('src', '...');
var elem = new Ext.Element(element);
elem.addClass('something');
but to me this does not look really nice. It looks a bit complex instead.
Are there any other alternative ways I could use besides wrapping the element around my own object that offers me these cool methods?

Just check if there's already an implementation defined. I'm pretty sure addClassName is not going to have a different signature than you have at the moment.
if (!node.prototype.addClassName) {
node.prototype.addClassName = function addClassName(name) {
// your code
}
}

Setting properties on anonymous DOM elements through JavaScript?

Let's say I'm generating markup through server-side code. I'm generating a bunch of HTML tags but I want to add custom client-side behavior.
With JavaScript (if I had a reference to the DOM node) I could have written:
var myDOMNode = ...
myDOMNode.myCustomAttribute = "Hi!";
Now the issue here is that I don't want to qualify every element with an unique id just to initialize data. And it's really strange to me, that there's not an easier and unobtrusive way to attach client-side behavior.
If I'm remembing this correctly, this is valid IE stuff.
<div onload="this.myCustomAttribute='Hi!'"></div>
If I was able to do this, I should be able to access it's "data context" though the identifier 'myCustomAttribute', which is really what I want.

The following will work but not validate:
<div myattribute="myvalue"></div>
But if you are injecting it into the HTML with Javascript, then perhaps that's not concern for you. Otherwise, you can use something like jQuery to process the elements before adding them to the DOM:
$(elements).each(function(){
$(this).attr('myattribute','myvalue');
});

First off you should access custom attributes using the getAttribute and setAttribute methods if you want your code to work on other browsers than IE.
As to your event handler question that really depends on how you add the event handler.
Assigning a function directly to the elements onXXXX property would allow you access the the element via this.
If you use IE's attachEvent you can't use this, you can access the element that generated the event using event.srcElementbut that may be child element of the div. Hence you will need to test for the existance of myCustomAttribute and search up the ancestors until you find it.

I do appricate the input but I've finally figured this out and it's the way I go about initialization that has been the thorn in my side.
What you never wan't do is to pollute your global namespace with a bunch of short lived identifiers. Any time you put id="" on an element you're doing exactly that (same thing for any top level function). By relying on jQuery, HTML5 data and CSS there's a solution to my problem which I think is quite elegant.
What I do is that I reserve a CSS class for a specific behavior and then use HTML5 data to parameterize the behavior. When the document is ready, I query the document (using Query) for the CSS class that represents the behavior and initialize the client-side behavior.
I've been doing a lot of ASP.NET and within this context both the id="" and name="" belongs to ASP.NET and is pretty useless for anything else than internal ASP.NET stuff. What you typically find yourself doing is to get at a server-side property called ClientID you can refer to this from client-side JavaScript, it's a lot of hassle. They made it easier in 4.0 but fundamentally I think it's pretty much broken.
Using this hybrid of CSS, HTML5 data and jQuery solves this problem altogether. Here's an example of an attached behavior that uses regular expressions to validate the input of a textbox.
<input type="text" class="-input-regex" data-regex="^[a-z]+$" />
And here's the script:
$(function () {
function checkRegex(inp) {
if (inp.data("regex").test(inp.val()))
inp.data("good-value", inp.val());
else
inp.val(inp.data("good-value"));
}
$(".-input-regex")
.each(function () {
// starting with jQuery 1.5
// you can get at HTML5 data like this
var inp = $(this);
var pattern = inp.data("regex");
inp.data("regex", new RegExp(pattern));
checkRegex(inp);
})
.keyup(function (e) {
checkRegex($(this));
})
.change(function (e) {
checkRegex($(this));
})
.bind("paste", undefined, function (e) {
checkRegex($(this));
})
;
});
Totally clean, no funky id="" or obtrusive dependency.

In HTML5 there are HTML5 data attributes introduced exactly for the case.
<!DOCTYPE html>
<div data-my-custom-attribute='Hi!'></div>
is now corect, validating html. You can use any name starting with data- in any quantity.
There is jQuery .data method for interaction with them. Use .data( key ) to get, .data(key, value) to set data-key attribute. For example,
$('div').each(function () {
$(this).html($(this).data('myCustomAttribute')).data('processed', 'OK');
});

How about this?
<script>
function LoadElement(myDiv)
{
alert(this.myCustomAttribute);
}
</script>
<div onload="LoadElement(this)"></div>
not tested btw

Since you're trying to do this for multiple elements, you may try name attributes and getElementsByName.
<div name="handleonload">...</div>
window.onload = function () {
var divs = document.getElementsByName('handleonload');
for (var i = 0; i < divs.length; i += 1) {
divs[i].foo = 'bar';
}
};
Alternatively, you can use selectors, using libraries (such as jQuery and Prototype) and their respective iterators. This will also allow for you to search by other attributes (such as class).
Though, be cautious with your terminology:
obj.property = value;
<tag attribute="value">

<div style="width:100px;height:100px;border:solid black 1px" myCustomAttribute='Hi!' onclick="alert(myCustomAttribute);"></div>

The onload event is used for server side events. Its not part of the standard html element events.

Take a look at the following functions (especially the walk_the_dom one):
// walk_the_DOM visits every node of the tree in HTML source order, starting
// from some given node. It invokes a function,
// passing it each node in turn. walk_the_DOM calls
// itself to process each of the child nodes.
var walk_the_DOM = function walk(node, func) {
func(node);
node = node.firstChild;
while (node) {
walk(node, func);
node = node.nextSibling;
}
};
// getElementsByAttribute takes an attribute name string and an optional
// matching value. It calls walk_the_DOM, passing it a
// function that looks for an attribute name in the
// node. The matching nodes are accumulated in a
// results array.
var getElementsByAttribute = function (att, value) {
var results = [];
walk_the_DOM(document.body, function (node) {
var actual = node.nodeType === 1 && node.getAttribute(att);
if (typeof actual === 'string' &&
(actual === value || typeof value !== 'string')) {
results.push(node);
}
});
return results;
};
With the above two functions at hand, now we can do something like this:
some link
<script>
var els = getElementsByAttribute('dreas');
if (els.length > 0) {
els[0].innerHTML = 'changed text';
}
</script>
Notice how now I am making finding that particular element (which has an attribute called dreas) without using an id or a class name...or even a tag name

Looks like jQuery is the best bet for this one based on my searching. You can bind an object to a DOM node by:
var domNode = ...
var myObject = { ... }
$(domNode).data('mydata', mymyObj);
then you can call the data back up the same way, using your key.
var myObect = $(domNode).data('mydata');
I assume you could also store a reference to this within this object, but that may be more info then you really want. Hope I could help.

Unique element ID, even if element doesn't have one

I'm writing a GreaseMonkey script where I'm iterating through a bunch of elements. For each element, I need a string ID that I can use to reference that element later. The element itself doesn't have an id attribute, and I can't modify the original document to give it one (although I can make DOM changes in my script). I can't store the references in my script because when I need them, the GreaseMonkey script itself will have gone out of scope. Is there some way to get at an "internal" ID that the browser uses, for example? A Firefox-only solution is fine; a cross-browser solution that could be applied in other scenarios would be awesome.
Edit:
If the GreaseMonkey script is out of scope, how are you referencing the elements later? They GreaseMonkey script is adding events to DOM objects. I can't store the references in an array or some other similar mechanism because when the event fires, the array will be gone because the GreaseMonkey script will have gone out of scope. So the event needs some way to know about the element reference that the script had when the event was attached. And the element in question is not the one to which it is attached.
Can't you just use a custom property on the element? Yes, but the problem is on the lookup. I'd have to resort to iterating through all the elements looking for the one that has that custom property set to the desired id. That would work, sure, but in large documents it could be very time consuming. I'm looking for something where the browser can do the lookup grunt work.
Wait, can you or can you not modify the document? I can't modify the source document, but I can make DOM changes in the script. I'll clarify in the question.
Can you not use closures? Closuses did turn out to work, although I initially thought they wouldn't. See my later post.
It sounds like the answer to the question: "Is there some internal browser ID I could use?" is "No."

The answer is no, there isn't an internal id you can access. Opera and IE (maybe Safari?) support .sourceIndex (which changes if DOM does) but Firefox has nothing of this sort.
You can simulate source-index by generating Xpath to a given node or finding the index of the node from document.getElementsByTagName('*') which will always return elements in source order.
All of this requires a completely static file of course. Changes to DOM will break the lookup.
What I don't understand is how you can loose references to nodes but not to (theoretical) internal id's? Either closures and assignments work or they don't. Or am I missing something?

Closure is the way to go. This way you'll have exact reference to the element that even will survive some shuffling of DOM.
Example for those who don't know closures:
var saved_element = findThatDOMNode();
document.body.onclick = function()
{
alert(saved_element); // it's still there!
}
If you had to store it in a cookie, then I recommend computing XPath for it (e.g. walk up the DOM counting previous siblings until you find element with an ID and you'll end up with something like [#id=foo]/div[4]/p[2]/a).
XPointer is W3C's solution to that problem.

A bit confused by the wording of your question - you say that you "need a string ID that [you] can use to reference that element later, " but that you "can't store the references in [your] script because when [you] need them, the GreaseMonkey script itself will have gone out of scope."
If the script will have gone out of scope, then how are you referencing them later?!
I am going to ignore the fact that I am confused by what you are getting at and tell you that I write Greasemonkey scripts quite often and can modify the DOM elements I access to give them an ID property. This is code you can use to get a pseudo-unique value for temporary use:
var PseudoGuid = new (function() {
this.empty = "00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000";
this.GetNew = function() {
var fourChars = function() {
return (((1 + Math.random()) * 0x10000)|0).toString(16).substring(1).toUpperCase();
}
return (fourChars() + fourChars() + "-" + fourChars() + "-" + fourChars() + "-" + fourChars() + "-" + fourChars() + fourChars() + fourChars());
};
})();
// usage example:
var tempId = PseudoGuid.GetNew();
someDomElement.id = tempId;
That works for me, I just tested it in a Greasemonkey script myself.
UPDATE: Closures are the way to go - personally, as a hard-core JavaScript developer, I don't know how you didn't think of those immediately. :)
myDomElement; // some DOM element we want later reference to
someOtherDomElement.addEventListener("click", function(e) {
// because of the closure, here we have a reference to myDomElement
doSomething(myDomElement);
}, false);
Now, myDomElement is one of the elements you apparently, from your description, already have around (since you were thinking of adding an ID to it, or whatever).
Maybe if you post an example of what you are trying to do, it would be easier to help you, assuming this doesn't.

UPDATE: Closures are indeed the answer. So after fiddling with it some more, I figured out why closures were initially problematic and how to fix it. The tricky thing with a closure is you have to be careful when iterating through the elements not to end up with all of your closures referencing the same element. For example, this doesn't work:
for (var i = 0; i < elements.length; i++) {
var element = elements[i];
var button = document.createElement("button");
button.addEventListener("click", function(ev) {
// do something with element here
}, false)
}
But this does:
var buildListener = function(element) {
return function(ev) {
// do something with event here
};
};
for (var i = 0; i < elements.length; i++) {
var element = elements[i];
var button = document.createElement("button");
button.addEventListener("click", buildListener(element), false)
}
Anyway, I decided not to select one answer because the question had two answers: 1) No, there are no internal IDs you can use; 2) you should use closures for this. So I simply upvoted the first people to say whether there were internal IDs or who recommended generating IDs, plus anyone who mentioned closures. Thanks for the help!

If you can write to the DOM (I'm sure you can). I would solve this like this:
Have a function return or generate an ID:
//(function () {
var idCounter = new Date().getTime();
function getId( node ) {
return (node.id) ? node.id : (node.id = 'tempIdPrefix_' + idCounter++ );
}
//})();
Use this to get ID's as needed:
var n = document.getElementById('someid');
getId(n); // returns "someid"
var n = document.getElementsByTagName('div')[1];
getId(n); // returns "tempIdPrefix_1224697942198"
This way you don't need to worry about what the HTML looks like when the server hands it to you.

If you're not modifying the DOM you can get them all by indexed order:
(Prototype example)
myNodes = document.body.descendants()
alert(document.body.descendants()[1].innerHTML)
You could loop through all of the nodes and give them a unique className that you could later select easily.

You can set the id attribute to a computed value. There is a function in the prototype library that can do this for you.
http://www.prototypejs.org/api/element/identify
My favorite javascript library is jQuery. Unfortunately jQuery does not have a function like identify. However, you can still set the id attribute to a value that you generate on your own.
http://docs.jquery.com/Attributes/attr#keyfn
Here is a partial snippet from jQuery docs that sets id for divs based on the position in the page:
$(document).ready(function(){
$("div").attr("id", function (arr) {
return "div-id" + arr;
});
});

You can generate a stable, unique identifier for any given node in a DOM with the following function:
function getUniqueKeyForNode (targetNode) {
const pieces = ['doc'];
let node = targetNode;
while (node && node.parentNode) {
pieces.push(Array.prototype.indexOf.call(node.parentNode.childNodes, node));
node = node.parentNode
}
return pieces.reverse().join('/');
}
This will create identifiers such as doc/0, doc/0/0, doc/0/1, doc/0/1/0, doc/0/1/1 for a structure like this one:
<div>
<div />
<div>
<div />
<div />
</div>
</div>
There are also a few optimisations and changes you can make, for example:
In the while loop, break when that node has an attribute you know to be unique, for example #id
Not reverse() the pieces, currently it is just there to look more like the DOM structure the ID's are generated from
Not include the first piece doc if you don't need an identifier for the document node
Save the identifier on the node in some way, and reuse that value for child nodes to avoid having to traverse all the way up the tree again.
If you're writing these identifiers back to XML, use another concatenation character if the attribute you're writing is restricted.

Use mouse and/or positional properties of the element to generate a unique ID.

In javascript, you could attach a custom ID field to the node
if(node.id) {
node.myId = node.id;
} else {
node.myId = createId();
}
// store myId
It's a bit of hack, but it'll give each and every node an id you can use. Of course, document.getElementById() won't pay attention to it.

You can also use pguid (page-unique identifier) for unique identifier generation:
pguid = b9j.pguid.next() // A unique id (suitable for a DOM element)
// is generated
// Something like "b9j-pguid-20a9ff-0"
...
pguid = b9j.pguid.next() // Another unique one... "b9j-pguid-20a9ff-1"
// Build a custom generator
var sequence = new b9j.pguid.Sequence({ namespace: "frobozz" })
pguid = sequence.next() "frobozz-c861e1-0"
http://appengine.bravo9.com/b9j/documentation/pguid.html

I 'think' I've just solved a problem similar to this. However, I'm using jQuery in a browser DOM environment.
var objA = $("selector to some dom element");
var objB = $("selector to some other dom element");
if( objA[0] === objB[0]) {
//GREAT! the two objects point to exactly the same dom node
}

OK, there is no ID associated to DOM element automatically.
DOM has a hierarchycal structure of elements which is the main information.
From this perspective, you can associate data to DOM elements with jQuery or jQLite. It can solve some issues when you have to bind custom data to elements.