Develop Reference

Newbie: Javascript constructor and scope-context issue

I'm confused as to what the problem is with context in a JS constructor. Within the ctor I have a function declared. Before the call to that function this is set to the context of the ctor. Inside the function the value of this is set to window. I don't understand why. In the HTML the ctor is called with 'new'.
function MyCtor() {
var myFunc = function() {
debugger; // #2
// code for myFunc
}
debugger; // #1
myFunc();
debugger; // #3
}
At debugger #1, this is set to MyCtor. At #2 this is window. And at #3 it is back to MyCtor.
I'm sure I'm missing something basic here, but I've read a lot on scope and context; obviously not enough.

The this object is one of the most annoyingly hard-to-understand concepts in Javascript. And that's quite a contest to win... First off, you have to understand that it will be specific to each function you call - the context in which you call myFunc won't set it how you want it. Here's one way you can do it:
function MyCtor() {
this.myFunc = function() {
debugger; // #2
// code for myFunc
}
debugger; // #1
this.myFunc();
debugger; // #3
}
Generally, there are only a few situations in which you can rely upon a function's this to be a particular value. All of them to my knowledge:
objectToBeThis.aFunction = function() { ... } // declare this function as
// an object property at any time -
objectToBeThis.aFunction();
Or, not used as often is:
aFunction.call(objectToBeThis, extraArgument1, extraArgument2);
When a named, but not "owned" function (ie, var functionName = function(), or function functionName()) is called, then it will have window as its this argument. This part I'm less sure of as a certainty, but I just wouldn't use this inside such a method.
As in the case of your code, there's also "new MyCtor" - in which a new object is created to be returned, and that object is set to this inside of the constructor method.

call a js function based on the argument passed

I'm trying to call a js function within another one, but use the argument to specify the function. ie depending on the argument passed, it will call a different function
function toggle(n){
if (sessionStorage['toggle'+n]== 0){
check+n();
}
else
}
So, for example, if the argument 'Balloons' was passed as n, then it will call the function checkBalloons(). "check+n();" is not currently working here. Sorry for my lack of simple js syntax!

If the function is defined in the global scope (browser) you can do:
window["check"+n]();
or some tenants like Node.js you would access it from global object.
global["check"+n]();
if it is a part of some other object then you would do the same.
obj["check"+n]();
Functions and properties defined on an object can be accessed using [] convention as well. i.e obj["propFuncName"] will give you reference to it, so in case of methods you add () to invoke it.

If the function is global, you would do this:
window["check" + n]();
or, you could put your function in an object like so:
myNamespace = {};
myNamespace.checkSomething = function(){ /* ... */ }
// call it like this:
myNamespace["check" + n]();

The answers thus far are correct, but lack explanation.
In JavaScript, you cannot call a function by name when that name is a string. What you can do is retrieve a value from an object by name, and if that value happens to be a function, you can then call it. For example:
var myObject = {};
myObject.myFunction = function() { alert('test!'); };
// Get the property on `myObject` called `myFunction`
var theFunctionLookup = myObject['myFunction'];
// Since that property was a function, you can call it!
theFunctionLookup();
In the browser, functions that are defined in the global scope are attached to the window object. For example, this works:
function myFunction() { alert('test'); }
var theFunctionLookup = window['myFunction'];
theFunctionLookup();
You can shorten the last two lines into one:
function myFunction() { alert('test'); }
// Look up and call the function in one line.
window['myFunction']();
For the same reasons, you can use a dynamically-calculated string to look up functions.
function checkBalloon() {
alert('checking balloon');
}
function toggle(n){
if (sessionStorage['toggle'+n]== 0){
window['check' + n]();
check+n();
}
}
toggle('Balloon');

if you do this way:
if (sessionStorage['toggle'+n]== 0){
window["check" + n]();
}
will work

How do I make a nonexistent (non-member, non-global) method invocable without using eval?

Let's start from the code:
function say(name) {
var ghost=function () {
function ghost() {
alert('!');
};
return body;
};
eval("var body=''+"+name+';');
eval(name+('=('+ghost).replace('body', body)+')();');
eval(name+'();');
}
function Baal() {
if ('undefined'===typeof ghost) {
say('Baal');
return;
}
ghost();
}
say('Baal'); // or just Baal();
Looks like that saying the devil's name invoke his presence (well, maybe he needs somebody for spiritual possession) ..
As you can see the ghost doesn't exist along with Baal, but we can invoke it since there're evals in say(name).
say(name) reassigns Baal to its code body as a closure and makes it captured a ghost method, that's how things work. But I'm trying to avoid eval ..
So .. let me reword the question:
How do I make a nonexistent(and not a member or global) method invocable without using eval?

Let me rephrase your question, just to make sure I’ve got it. Given a function, you want to put a new variable in its scope, without that scope being the global scope or a scope shared between the caller and the subject, without using eval (or the equivalent new Function and other hacks depending on the environment).
You can’t.
In the case you just mentioned, you could define one function, base(), that uses arguments.callee.caller.
Don’t do that.

The short answer: You don't.
That scope is not available. If you were to attach the scope then it would be available inside of the scope used. You could then access the method handles. I assume this is not what you were looking for, but here is what that would look like. demo
function say(name){
var methods = {};
methods.Baal = function(){
alert("!");
};
return methods[name];//this could invoke as well: methods[name]()
}
var handle = say('Baal');
handle();
What your evals break down to is something along these lines (although with dynamic content from string building - this is the end result)
function say(name) {
var Baal = (function () {
function ghost() {
alert('!');
};
return function(){
if ('undefined'===typeof ghost) {
say('Baal');
return;
}
ghost();
}
})();
Baal();
}
say('Baal'); // or just Baal();
Note that the meat of what happens here is from the function Baal, namely that it calls a hardcoded ghost() which in turn calls a hardcoded alert. Why go through all of this trouble to access a hardcoded function?
A better way would be to inject this function as a callback which expects some parameters to be injected.
jsFiddle Demo
function say(callback){
var params = "!";
if( typeof callback == "function" ){
callback(params);
}
}
say(function(params){
alert(params);
});

It's very difficult for me to read through your code and figure out what you are trying to accomplish with it, but it appears that you are trying to introduce a variable into the current scope so that you can call it. You cannot do this in javascript with the method that you demonstrated. Scoping only ever "flows down". By that I mean that a variable or function defined within a function will only be available to that function and any other functions defined therein. Your function named ghost will only ever be available within the function where it is defined, regardless of when that function is evaluated.
What you can do, however, is write a function that returns a function. You can then call that function and assign the result to a variable in the scope where you want to expose functionality. Doing that would look something like this.
function defineSpecialAlert() {
return function(name) {
alert(name + "!");
};
}
var newlyDefinedMethod = defineSpecialAlert();
newlyDefinedMethod("Baal");

So if I understand, it seems like you want to create an alias of eval: Something like
#Note this code is not intended as a solution, but demonstrates
#an attempt that is guaranteed to fail.
#
function myAlias(ctx) {
eval.call(ctx, 'var ghost = 42');
}
myAlias(this);
alert(ghost);
Javascript allows many funky sleight-of-hand tricks especially with closures, but this is maybe the one impossible thing that javascript cannot do. I've tried at length to do this exact same thing, and I can tell you that you'll run into nothing but complaints from the browser, saying that eval cannot be re-contexted or aliased in any way.

How to execute a method passed as parameter to function

I want to write my own function in JavaScript which takes a callback method as a parameter and executes it after the completion, I don't know how to invoke a method in my method which is passed as an argument. Like Reflection.
example code
function myfunction(param1, callbackfunction)
{
//do processing here
//how to invoke callbackfunction at this point?
}
//this is the function call to myfunction
myfunction("hello", function(){
//call back method implementation here
});

You can just call it as a normal function:
function myfunction(param1, callbackfunction)
{
//do processing here
callbackfunction();
}
The only extra thing is to mention context. If you want to be able to use the this keyword within your callback, you'll have to assign it. This is frequently desirable behaviour. For instance:
function myfunction(param1, callbackfunction)
{
//do processing here
callbackfunction.call(param1);
}
In the callback, you can now access param1 as this. See Function.call.

I too came into same scenario where I have to call the function sent as parameter to another function.
I Tried
mainfunction('callThisFunction');
First Approach
function mainFuntion(functionName)
{
functionName();
}
But ends up in errors. So I tried
Second Approach
functionName.call().
Still no use. So I tried
Third Approach
this[functionName]();
which worked like a champ. So This is to just add one more way of calling. May be there may be problem with my First and Second approaches, but instead googling more and spending time I went for Third Approach.

function myfunction(param1, callbackfunction)
{
//do processing here
callbackfunction(); // or if you want scoped call, callbackfunction.call(scope)
}

object[functionName]();
object: refers to the name of the object.
functionName: is a variable whose value we will use to call a function.
by putting the variable used to refer to the function name inside the [] and the () outside the bracket we can dynamically call the object's function using the variable. Dot notation does not work because it thinks that 'functionName' is the actual name of the function and not the value that 'functionName' holds. This drove me crazy for a little bit, until I came across this site. I am glad stackoverflow.com exists <3

All the examples here seem to show how to declare it, but not how to use it. I think that's also why #Kiran had so many issues.
The trick is to declare the function which uses a callback:
function doThisFirst(someParameter, myCallbackFunction) {
// Do stuff first
alert('Doing stuff...');
// Now call the function passed in
myCallbackFunction(someParameter);
}
The someParameter bit can be omitted if not required.
You can then use the callback as follows:
doThisFirst(1, myOtherFunction1);
doThisFirst(2, myOtherFunction2);
function myOtherFunction1(inputParam) {
alert('myOtherFunction1: ' + inputParam);
}
function myOtherFunction2(inputParam) {
alert('myOtherFunction2: ' + inputParam);
}
Note how the callback function is passed in and declared without quotes or brackets.
If you use doThisFirst(1, 'myOtherFunction1'); it will fail.
If you use doThisFirst(1, myOtherFunction3()); (I know there's no parameter input in this case) then it will call myOtherFunction3 first so you get unintended side effects.

Another way is to declare your function as anonymous function and save it in a variable:
var aFunction = function () {
};
After that you can pass aFunction as argument myfunction and call it normally.
function myfunction(callbackfunction) {
callbackfunction();
}
myfunction(aFunction);
However, as other answers have pointed out, is not necessary, since you can directly use the function name. I will keep the answer as is, because of the discussion that follows in the comments.

I will do something like this
var callbackfunction = function(param1, param2){
console.log(param1 + ' ' + param2)
}
myfunction = function(_function, _params){
_function(_params['firstParam'], _params['secondParam']);
}
Into the main code block, It is possible pass parameters
myfunction(callbackfunction, {firstParam: 'hello', secondParam: 'good bye'});

callbackfunction = () => {}
callbackfunction2(){
}
function myfunction1(callbackfunction) {
callbackfunction();
}
//Exe
myfunction1(callbackfunction);
myfunction1(callbackfunction2.bind(this));

Super basic implementation for my use case based on some excellent answers and resources above:
/** Returns the name of type member in a type-safe manner. **(UNTESTED)** e.g.:
*
* ```typescript
* nameof<Apple>(apple => apple.colour); // Returns 'colour'
* nameof<Apple>(x => x.colour); // Returns 'colour'
* ```
*/
export function nameof<T>(func?: (obj: T) => any): string {
const lambda = ' => ';
const funcStr = func.toString();
const indexOfLambda = funcStr.indexOf(lambda);
const member = funcStr.replace(funcStr.substring(0, indexOfLambda) + '.', '').replace(funcStr.substring(0, indexOfLambda) + lambda, '');
return member;
}

Unable to use "class" methods for callbacks in JavaScript

I'm having a really rough time wrapping my head around prototypes in JavaScript.
Previously I had trouble calling something like this:
o = new MyClass();
setTimeout(o.method, 500);
and I was told I could fix it by using:
setTimeout(function() { o.method(); }, 500);
And this works. I'm now having a different problem, and I thought I could solve it the same way, by just dropping in an anonymous function. My new problem is this:
MyClass.prototype.open = function() {
$.ajax({
/*...*/
success: this.some_callback,
});
}
MyClass.prototype.some_callback(data) {
console.log("received data! " + data);
this.open();
}
I'm finding that within the body of MyClass.prototype.some_callback the this keyword doesn't refer to the instance of MyClass which the method was called on, but rather what appears to be the jQuery ajax request (it's an object that contains an xhr object and all the parameters of my ajax call, among other things).
I have tried doing this:
$.ajax({
/* ... */
success: function() { this.some_callback(); },
});
but I get the error:
Uncaught TypeError: Object #<an Object> has no method 'handle_response'
I'm not sure how to properly do this. I'm new to JavaScript and the concept of prototypes-that-sometimes-sort-of-behave-like-classes-but-usually-don't is really confusing me.
So what is the right way to do this? Am I trying to force JavaScript into a paradigm which it doesn't belong?

Am I trying to force JavaScript into a paradigm which it doesn't belong?
When you're talking about Classes yes.
So what is the right way to do this?
First off, you should learn how what kind of values the this keyword can contain.
Simple function call
myFunc(); - this will refer to the global object (aka window) [1]
Function call as a property of an object (aka method)
obj.method(); - this will refer to obj
Function call along wit the new operator
new MyFunc(); - this will refer to the new instance being created
Now let's see how it applies to your case:
MyClass.prototype.open = function() {
$.ajax({ // <-- an object literal starts here
//...
success: this.some_callback, // <- this will refer to that object
}); // <- object ends here
}
If you want to call some_callback method of the current instance you should save the reference to that instance (to a simple variable).
MyClass.prototype.open = function() {
var self = this; // <- save reference to the current instance of MyClass
$.ajax({
//...
success: function () {
self.some_callback(); // <- use the saved reference
} // to access instance.some_callback
});
}
[1] please note that in the new version (ES 5 Str.) Case 1 will cause this to be the value undefined
[2] There is yet another case where you use call or apply to invoke a function with a given this

Building on #gblazex's response, I use the following variation for methods that serve as both the origin and target of callbacks:
className.prototype.methodName = function(_callback, ...) {
var self = (this.hasOwnProperty('instance_name'))?this.instance_name:this;
if (_callback === true) {
// code to be executed on callback
} else {
// code to set up callback
}
};
on the initial call, "this" refers to the object instance. On the callback, "this" refers to your root document, requiring you to refer to the instance property (instance_name) of the root document.