Can we explicitly and specifically catch Puppeteer (Chromme/Chromium) error net::ERR_ABORTED? Or is string matching the only option currently?
page.goto(oneClickAuthPage).catch(e => {
if (e.message.includes('net::ERR_ABORTED')) {}
})
/* "net::ERROR_ABORTED" occurs for sub-resources on a page if we navigate
* away too quickly. I'm specifically awaiting a 302 response for successful
* login and then immediately navigating to the auth-protected page.
*/
await page.waitForResponse(res => res.url() === href && res.status() === 302)
page.goto(originalRequestPage)
Ideally, this would be similar to a potential event we could catch with page.on('requestaborted')
I'd recommend putting your api calls and so in a trycatch block
If it fails, you catch the error, like you are currently doing. But it just looks a bit nicer
try {
await page.goto(PAGE)
} catch(error) {
console.log(error) or console.error(error)
//do specific functionality based on error codes
if(error.status === 300) {
//I don't know what app you are building this in
//But if it's in React, here you could do
//setState to display error messages and so forth
setError('Action aborted')
//if it's in an express app, you can respond with your own data
res.send({error: 'Action aborted'})
}
}
If there are not specific error codes in the error responses for when Puppeteer is aborted, it means that Puppeteer's API has not been coded to return data like that, unfortunately :')
It's not too uncommon to do error messages checks like you are doing in your question. It's, unfortunately, the only way we can do it, since this is what we're given to work with :'P
Related
I am triggering a bad request on purpose from my backend. The backend using express is answering properly as expected with:
[...]
.catch((error) => {
res.statusCode = 400;
res.json({
msg: "This is some error",
err: error,
});
});
My question is: Is the 400 always showing up in browser console? I thought I handled the error the right way.
And why do I have to retrieve the data in the frontend with
// 400:
function (data) {
var data = data.responseJSON.msg);
}
instead of (similar to 200:)
// 400:
function (data) {
var data = data.msg);
}
I am just wondering, if I do something wrong.
Thanks for any advice
When fetching data asynchronously, any response other than a 2** response code gets handled by a .catch block. So any other response whether it be 4** or 5** gets caught by the catch block and for that reason if you're using a library like Axios or the likes the response from the backend will be in the error.response or data.response in your case.
I wasn't aware of what you're using to carry out the asynchronous fetching of data i.e. Fetch Api so my answer is a generic response and also is the above code complete?
In my experience any error from whatever weither it be am asynchronous call that generates an error always gets logged to the console, but you can from the front end handle those errors in the catch block
The problem is when the console.log tries to output the error, the string representation is printed, not the object structure, so you do not see the .response property or in your case the .responseJSON
By catching your error with an catch block .catch() or if you using async / await you should, usually, wrap the code inside of an try / catch to catch the error otherwise it will always output this red error in the console
In my app ( i'm using next.js but it's more a general question ) i have a button that updates number of likes when clicked (+1). Here is relevant part of code:
const handleLikeClick = () => {
setNumberLikes(numberLikes + 1)
fetch('/api/updateLikes?origin=so-filter', {
method: 'POST'
})
}
And my API:
import { connectToDatabase } from '../../utils/mongodb'
export default async (req, res) => {
try {
const { db } = await connectToDatabase()
const { origin } = req.query
if (req.method === 'POST') {
await db.collection('likes').findOneAndUpdate({ page: origin }, { $inc: { likes: 1 }})
res.status(200)
}
}
catch (err) {
res.status(500)
}
}
I don't really care much if this POST request fails or not, therefore, i'm not checking for it and there is no additional logic if it actually fails. Is it a bad practice to do so ? Should i actually res.status(200).json({success:'updated'}) and .then my fetch request? Thank you.
Depends on what you want to achieve at the user level.
Although the result doesn't influence the flow of your program and doesn't break it, most of the times there is some importance to let the fetcher/user know what happened with the request.
Sometimes (like in your case) it can have an impact to the user experience. In your example, in case of failure, I think the user should get an error message or some sort of visualization that the like didn't cast, so he could try again or at least know that there was a problem.
(I'm pretty sure Facebook, Youtube, and StackOverflow just grays out upvoted or likes if something went wrong. In StackOverflow you even get a message with the specific error).
Edit
Code-wise it will work just fine since you are care to give a returned status code in any case (of success or failure).
From the documents:
The Promise returned from fetch() won’t reject on HTTP error status even if the response is an HTTP 404 or 500. Instead, it will resolve normally (with ok status set to false), and it will only reject on network failure or if anything prevented the request from completing.`
(Notice that you will want to handle network failures though).
I'm trying to log an error from a subscribe, but the error seems... incomplete?
I've never seen this kind of problem, nor could I find anything on Google. The code is the following:
this._http.post(this.urlPath, email).subscribe(
res => {
// stuff
},
err => {
console.log(err) // <- I need to log this
}
);
It works to an extent. When I open the browser's console, in order to check the error, what I get is this:
The thing is, it seems like there's missing information here. If I open the Network tab, the response for this same request looks like this:
As you can see, the real response has more information. I've tried using {observe: "response"}, but to no avail. I should note that if I try using fetch, the response comes complete, but I'd rather use HttpClient.
What is going on here?
When you receive a http error status code you can't access to the payload returned by the service by the same way that in a success case. Is like an special object.
But you can acccess to it doing some like this, using a pipe in your service and an error handler. This is a minimal example of it:
your.service.ts
...
handleError(error) {
return throwError(error.error);
}
return this.http.get ... the rest of your request.pipe(
catchError(this.handleError)
);
...
And where you consume your service, in err you can acces to full response that your error request contains.
...
, error => {
console.warn(error);
}
Or better than, you can throw the entire object to access to the error (response body) and the rest of params, like status code.
I have a route where i send to the api the day and h to verify in database if there is an opening in a schedule, if is not the api is sending 406. And i'm getting in console 406 error.
How should i handle that error to have a clean console?
You can simply wrap an api call into try-catch and simply don't to do anything with e in catch part.
try { ... you code here ... } catch(e){}
If you are using Axios for API calls you can create a global interceptor and return a response based on your status code to your component.
This would go in your main.js.
axios.interceptors.response.use(null, function(error) {
console.log(error);
if(err.response.status === 406){
//your code here.
}
return Promise.reject(error);
});
you can wrap your call in a try{} catch(e) {} to handle what happens after the error happens
but it is impossible to prevent the browser from showing the error in the console programmatically because of the potential risk that a script might misuse the errored requests to hide its activities from the user.
check_time(day,hour){
var fields = {};
fields.day = parseInt(day);
fields.hour = parseInt(hour);
try {
this.$http.post('courses/check', fields)
} catch {
this.$store.dispatch('alert', {'message': 'Already exist a course in this interval.'});
}
}
I've got a handleSubmit function that fetches data from my backend as part of a larger component. I'd like to send the error information to my redux store and/or local component when the back-end fails, but am unable to do so.
The handleSubmit function looks like this (it's using React hooks, which are wired up correctly. Can post the full component if that is useful):
const handleSubmit = async (e, { dataSource, filter, filterTarget }) => {
e.preventDefault();
setIsLoading(true);
setErrorValue(null);
setError(false);
const token = localStorage.JWT_TOKEN;
const link = filterTarget === "Identifier" ? `http://localhost:8081/api/${dataSource}/${filter}`: `http://localhost:8081/api/${dataSource}?filter=${filter}&filterTarget=${filterTarget}`;
try {
let data = await axios.get(link, { headers: { authorization: token }});
props.setData(data);
setError(false);
setIsLoading(false);
} catch (err){
setErrorValue(err.message);
setError(true);
setIsLoading(false);
};
};
I'm intentionally making bad requests through the form, which will trigger an error in my backend. These are handled through my custom Express middleware function, which looks like this (I'll add more once I get this framework to work):
handleOtherError: (error, req, res, next) => { // Final custom error handler, with no conditions. No need to call next() here.
console.log("This error handler is firing!");
return res.status(500).json({
message: error.message,
type: "ServerError"
});
}
I know that this function is firing because the console.log statement is appearing on my server, and if I change the status code, so does the status code error on the front-end in my Google Chrome console.
In fact, if I go to the network tab, the correct error information appears for my request. Here's the video of me making a bad request:
However, when I try to access the err.message on my front-end, I'm not able to do so. The err.message in my try/catch handler for the handleSubmit function only ever gives me the Request failed with status code XXX
What am I doing wrong?
See https://github.com/axios/axios#handling-errors
You can access the response by using err.response.data.message, not err.message.
Found the answer posted elsewhere: https://github.com/axios/axios/issues/960
Apparently, to get the message, you have to use err.response.data.message
Simply using "err" will only give you a basic string respresentation of the error.