I'm trying to figure out if it's possible to customize Ribbon in Word programatically using Word JavaScript API. I went through the documentation and couldn't figure it out. I'm also curious if it's even possible right now.
What I'd like to achieve is to disable one of the items within Revision Tab. There's a property on the Office object called Office.ribon, which provides requestUpdate(input) method, which should enable this kind of functionality. Although it looks like the RibbonApi is not fully supported yet in Word as stated in the documentation. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/office/dev/add-ins/reference/requirement-sets/ribbon-api-requirement-sets
Is there any alternative how to achieve this goal? It might be possible to do it in manifest.xml, but I'm not sure how to get the specific ID of that item. Only IDs of those top-level Tabs are documented, but not their buttons, dropdowns, etc. It also looks like it's only possible to customize only my own custom items, where I specify the ID by myself. Is it also possible to edit a state of those native Office components, like disabling a button within a Tab?
It seems like a basic operation which could already be a part of the API. Can anybody confirm that it's really impossible to do it so far or is there some kind of a workaround at least?
Thank you.
There is currently no way to programmatically change the ribbon in Word. We are working on enhanced ribbon customization, but I would not expect them to be available in Word before mid-2021 and they may not include the option of disabling a built-in ribbon button.
Related
Is there a way to set the active tab for a facebook page plugin with multiple tabs ? (timeline,messages,events)
The docs don't mention anything about any endpoints and the html structure doesn't have any static id's or classes.
Something like fb_page.setActiveTab('messages'); would be amazing but from what I've searched so far, there's nothing as such.
No, there is no such method available.
The plugin however seems to respect the order in which you supply the tabs you want to show - the first one you mention is always the active one, placed on the very left (at least in LTR languages).
So you could replace the plugin instance with a new one, that has the tabs parameter filled with tab names in the “right” order, to kind-of achieve the effect. (Since that will switch the order of tabs the user sees, it might not be the best idea though, could get confusing.)
Also, this behavior does not seem to be documented - so it might stop working this way at any time.
I have a website that has merged with another. It is a high ranking website so instead of using a redirect or similar I would like to keep the website online as is so that it does not affect SEO.
I want it so that when users visit the website it appears grayed out and a central box is shown with a message saying that the website has moved to www.newsite.com and they are not able to click any buttons etc. on the page.
Is it possible using jQuery or similar?
This is possible with jQuery modal, but to be quite honest your best bet really is to issue a permanent redirect (301) to the new site. You can likewise go to each of the major search engines and use their webmaster tools to indicate the site has moved. Your SEO ranking might dip briefly but the search engines really do recognize the fact that sites and content move these days, and the ranking won't be permanently affected.
You could do this however you like. JavaScript is probably not needed here. Create a simple modal, and style it in such a way that it looks how you have envisioned.
There are jQuery plugins to do this kind of thing, but honestly that's going to be more work to hook up and create more overhead than you would just making your own.
If you need some CSS help to accomplish this, let me know and I'll update my answer.
You can hide Everything in body and append a div and style it like an modal or something as you like
$(document).ready(function(){
node = $("<div id='modal'>Site has been Moved moved etc.. </div>")
$("body").append(node);
$("body *").not("modal").hide();
});
css
#modal{
/*style modal here */
}
Doing what you say will likely damage the SEO, however is possible with some simple css an jquery as long as the user has scripting active. CSS and HTML can achieve the majority of what you want without the need for Jquery or scripting.
A properly implemented 301 redirect will ensure google maps across and acknowledges the movements of pages from one domain to another. BUt you need to do this properly.
I am using dijit.form.Select as a replacement for the HTML SELECT.
I am unable to get it to allow me to select an item purely by typing as you can with the HTML version. Ie, if you have a list of US states you can hit C several times to select Conneticut. What am I missing? TIA
And yet, it works on the web page below....
http://archive.dojotoolkit.org/nightly/dojotoolkit/dijit/tests/form/test%5FSelect.html
When designing a select element that is visually consistent with a UI theme, CSS is often not powerful enough to completely control the look of select element, as some browsers treat CSS stylings on a select element differently. So the next best thing for many is to develop a faux-select with javascript so that way you have a better looking select element.
What you're left with is something that looks like a select element, but isn't, and the real select is hidden nearby, typically.
That means that there is a good possibility that when the developer was making that javascript version of the select element, they didn't do their diligence to at least program the minimum features that come native with the HTML version. (after all, it would be a lot of work to do string searching and sorting on a keyup event... and i'm not surprised they didn't do it)
to add insult to injury, sometimes the plugin actually allows for the change event on the native select to still be focused beneath the surface, which is why your typing works sometimes.
A chap named Bob Tarling has solved my problem. Much obliged Bob!!
See this link for his solution http://dojo-toolkit.33424.n3.nabble.com/Sharing-a-solution-for-type-ahead-in-Select-and-help-request-to-adapt-tt3995899.html#none
I am developing some javascript code that will replace a standard select element with a javascript controlled dropdown menu which will redirect users to a particular page. The standard select element must work when JS is disabled
An example of what I want to achieve is here: www.play.com
What I have noticed with this site is that they simply position the select element behind the javascript alternative. This means that both controls are available to screen readers and keyboard users.
Does anyone have any experience of setting such functionality up and have any suggestions for the best methods to ensure accessibility?
Plain links would be your starting setup, as they work to take users to new pages without any additional scripting required.
You can put them in a container ul, and then use javascript in a 'progressive enhancement' way to turn the list into a dropdown (by re-writing the html) for the people who've got it turned on. This way, a user without javascript turned on will have no problems, and the majority of users will see your drop-down menu.
Even better, don't use a select menu for navigation. It's not really semantically correct, and requires more work to make it operable and robust.
Try something like the Suckerfish drop-down menus which are based on nested lists: http://www.htmldog.com/articles/suckerfish/ or if you want a bit of jQuery fun: http://users.tpg.com.au/j_birch/plugins/superfish/#sample1
I am building a web application that will have a fair bit of forms. The html forms are generated using php.
One of the things I came across is this:
I have a drop down box for the user to select his country. Once he selects the country, a call is made to the server to fetch a list of states within that country and populate it in a drop down box.
Initially, I thought I could provide 2 options:
An enhanced jquery version where ajax is used to fetch the states and the populate it in a drop down.
Where javascript is not availiable, the whole page is submitted to the server and then rerendered with the new states in the drop down.
However, onChange() requires javascript. So if someone where to visit the form without javascript enabled, there's no way we can deal with the second option, since javascript is required to submit a form using onChange().
What are some ways to deal with this? My only solution at the moment is to just make javascript mandatory. Users without javascript enabled will see a message saying that the page will not work properly.
Some sites:
Hotmail.com - Refuses to show anything except a "javascript is required message"
Facebook.com - Tells us we should use the mobile version of the site.
Google Maps - Does not work. No message to say javascript is required.
Gmail - Falls back to basic html.
Google account - Does not work. No message to say javascript is required.
Is it acceptable to require users to have javascript enabled at the current state of the web (august 2011)?
Just came across this possible solution:
http://cita.disability.uiuc.edu/html-best-practices/auto/onchange.php
I could perhaps add a button which the user can use to select their country. This should allow us to reload and render the form with the states drop down without any javascript.
You can provide a drop-down of states and tell the user to leave it blank if not applicable. If JavaScript is enabled, it can remove the drop-down until a country where it is applicable is selected.
No, it is not acceptable to require JavaScript; many security-conscious users use NoScript, for example, and would prefer not to turn it off.
By default you should load all possible values into the second dropdown, then clear them out on page load with Javascript. That way people without Javascript enabled can still choose the correct option.
I'm guaranteed to take flak for this, but whether you support no-JS or not should be your call. If you think your userbase is likely to have a sizeable portion of people who disable JS, then you should give them a site that works, but not optimally. If you think most of them will be running with "normal" (air quotes are important there) browsers, then you may consider dropping support for no-JS users.
I am NOT a professional developer, so take my input accordingly. Here are my observations:
I support a website for a wedding cake vendor. Upon observing the competition, all the more appealing sites are embellished (tastefully) with slideshows, dropdowns, animations, interactive form validation, etc.
When scouting for methods to incorporate these features into our site, I found that mostly every classy method was based in javascript.
Figuring it was better to present ourselves as the classy act we are (humble smile), I have decided to require users to have javascript enabled. We've been up for 7 years, and I have not received any complaints. All work on mobile devices.
A compromise option is to start with your State drop-down populated with the states of whatever country your business is in, e.g., all US states, with an extra option (preferably at the top of the list) that says "Other, non-[yourcountrynamehere]". Next to the State drop-down have a text input where the user can type the name of their state if it's not in the list. If JavaScript is enabled then on document-ready you can hide the text input and go with your Ajax solution. Without JavaScript the user has a fully functional page that doesn't even need a reload.
What I ended up doing is to add a button beside the drop down that says "select country". Users without javascript will see this button. Upon clicking it, the page will reload with the list of states rendered.
For users without javascript, this button is hidden, and selecting a country will automatically render a new drop down containing the relevant states.