I am using react-bootstrap-table2, to make tables, I have encounter an issue i.e
I want o have a checkbox inside my table, so I am following This, mention in the documentation, but I am getting unexpected result.
My code
For selecting the row
const selectRow = {
mode: 'checkbox',
clickToSelect: true,
classes: 'selection-row',
};
Table rendering
<BootstrapTable
keyField="id"
data={tableData[0].rowsData}
columns={tableData[0].columnsData}
selectRow={selectRow}
/>
I Think issue is coming because of my data, as it is nested one And I am rendering it, but I am not able to resolve it.
My data
let tableData = [
{
rowsData: [
{
fname: "john",
lname: "smith"
},
{
fname: "steve",
lname: "warn"
},
{
fname: "michel",
lname: "clark"
}
],
columnsData: [
{
dataField: "fname",
text: "First name",
sort: true
},
{
dataField: "lname",
text: "last Name",
sort: true
}
]
}
];
Here is my code sandbox link This
You're telling keyField="id" yet each of your rowsData has no id. Give each of them an id and it should work.
Related
I am working on an offer letter template that will replace/modify Dynamic Data Points like Name, Address, Role, Salary, etc based on the candidate selected from a list of candidates. There is a fixed syntax for a dynamic data points i.e they will be enclosed within <<>>, for example :
Welcome to the family, <<Name>>
You will be paid <<Salary>> for the duration of your employment.
In other words, these few data points will change by selecting the candidate we want to offer the job and the rest of the template will remain the same. Here is a demo to help you understand.
This is a dummy array I have created with 1 template, In the real-world app, I can have many templates with different clauseNames, so I am looking for a permanent fix.
.ts file, Template List :
[{
templateId: 1,
templateName: "Offer",
clauses: [
{
clauseName: "Introduction",
clauseId: 1,
texts: [
{
text: "Hello <<Name>>, Welcome to the Machine",
textId: 1,
}]
},
{
clauseName: "Address",
clauseId: 2,
texts: [
{
text: "<<Address>>",
textId: 2,
}]
},
{
clauseName: "Date Of Joining",
clauseId: 3,
texts: [
{
text: "You can join us on <<DateOfJoining>>",
textId: 3,
}]
},
]
}]
and here is the candidate list,
candidateList = [
{ name: "Simba", address: "Some Random Cave" },
{ name: "Doe John", address: "line 4, binary avenue, Mobo" },
{ name: "B Rabbit", address: "8 mile road, Detroit" },
{ name: "Peter Griffin", address: "Spooner Street" },
{ name: "Speedy Gonzales", address: "401, hole 34, Slyvester Cat Road" },
{ name: "Morty", address: "Time Machine XYZ" },
{ name: "Brock", address: "pokeball 420, Medic center" },
]
You can use regular expressions to replace those placeholders such as:
var result = text.text.replace(/\<\<(.*?)\>\>/g, function(match, token) {
return candidate[token.toLowerCase()];
});
One way to incorporate this to your display is by creating a property that returns the formatted text.
I have updated your stackblitz here.
Take a look at this demo
I have modified the logic in below method:
showTeplate(name,address,doj) {
this.clauseList = [];
for (let a of this.templateList) {
if (a.clauses != null) {
for (let cl of a.clauses) {
const tempObj = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(cl));
tempObj.texts.forEach(textObj => {
textObj.text = textObj.text.replace("<<Name>>",name);
textObj.text = textObj.text.replace("<<Address>>",address);
textObj.text = textObj.text.replace("<<DateOfJoining>>",doj);
})
this.clauseList.push(tempObj)
}
}
}
console.log("Clause list", this.clauseList)
}
I have dynamic children input fields that need to be rendered in a function, but when they are, then they are not included in inputData properly/not under the parent input field's key. When the children are included directly in the inputFields, it works as expected, but I can't use a function within the children array with Zapier.
Here is the inputData currently, when the line items are rendered in a function, the LI_ denotes that it is a child input key -
"inputData": {
"supplier": "1",
"LI_budget": 1,
"LI_tax": 1,
"company": "1",
"currency": "1",
"LI_price": "1",
"LI_description": "1"
}
I'm expecting ("parent" is the inputField parent key here):
"inputData": {
"supplier": "1",
"parent": [{
"LI_budget": 1,
"LI_tax": 1,
"LI_price": "1",
"LI_description": "1"
}],
"company": "1",
"currency": "1",
}
This is the function I'm using to pull in the parent and children input fields:
const getLineItems = async (z, bundle) => {
let lineItem = {
key: 'parent',
children: [{
key: 'LI_description',
label: 'Description',
required: true
},
{
key: 'LI_budget',
required: true,
label: 'Budget',
dynamic: 'budget.id'
},
{
key: 'LI_price',
required: true,
type: 'number',
label: 'Unit price',
helpText: 'Example: 50.25'
},
{
key: 'LI_tax',
required: true,
label: 'Tax Rate',
dynamic: 'tax_rate.id'
},
]
}
return [lineItem];
};
There are dynamic fields generated in the getLineItems function that I took out to simplify. TIA
Caleb here from Zapier Platform Support. This is a tough one! We have a pretty long-standing issue report on our platform for supporting custom fields with parent keys (it boils down to a chicken vs the egg problem that really makes my head spin when I read the discussion on the issue). Your inputFields function is spot-on, it's just a matter of properly storing it in the bundle on our part.
I think we could cobble together a workaround to unflatten it. Before I do that though, could you give this a test in the editor and submit actual line items from a previous step to this step? I'm not sure what the inputData looks like (e.g. if multiple items are split like 1,2,3 or in some other fashion). If you want to iterate on this, it might be better to switch over to our public developer Slack (http://zpr.io/ttvdr); then we can post the results here for the next person to run into this. 😁
I have a Kendo grid where I'm trying to add a delete feature. My datasource looks like:
var datasource = new kendo.data.DataSource({
transport: {
read: {
url: Router.action("Admin", "GetScansForMailItem", { mailItemIdnt: detailinit.data.MailItemIdnt }),
dataType: "json"
},
destroy: {
url: Router.action("Admin", "DeleteScan"),
type: "post"
}
},
model: {
id: "ScanIdnt",
fields: {
ScanIdnt: {editable: false, nullable: false}
}
},
pageSize: 5
});
I added the model part because this answer, however it made no difference.
The actual grid looks like:
.kendoGrid({
dataSource: datasource
scrollable: false,
sortable: true,
pageable: true,
editable: "inline",
columns: [{
field: "ScanIdnt",
title: "Scan ID"
}, {
field: "CreatedDate",
title: "Created",
template: "#= kendo.parseDate(CreatedDate, 'yyyy/MM/dd') #"
}, {
field: "ScanDocumentRelativePath",
title: "File Path",
template: "<a href='/CAMP/Admin/Download?scanIdnt=#= ScanIdnt #'>#= ScanDocumentRelativePath.substring(1) #</a>"
}, {
field: "ScanUserIdnt",
title: "Scanned By"
},{
command: "destroy",
title: ""
}]
});
Strangely, clicking the delete button removes the from the gird on the UI, but there is absolutely no Ajax call is made the the destroy URL. I can't seem to figure out why. Any ideas?
EDIT I'd like to point out that this grid is in fact a nested grid inside of another grid (like here) I discovered that the parent grid handles actually makes a call, but to the wrong function. For some reason, it clicking delete on a to level item calls the read function of the nested grid, however, the nested grids do nothing
Figured it out (sorta). While I think there were many issues with my code and the grid, It seems that when it came down to it, Kendo didn't like how I had my data.
In the Kendo docs related to hierarchical grids, the data for the child grid is stored in a field of the data for the parent. For example, given the following JSON:
"ParentItems": [
{
"Id": 12345 ,
"Name": "Test1",
"ChildItems": [
{"Id": 1, "Name": "Test"},
{"Id": 2, "Name": "Test"}
]
},
{
"Id": 12346 ,
"Name": "Test2",
"ChildItems": [
{"Id": 1, "Name": "Test"},
{"Id": 2, "Name": "Test"}
]
}
]
In the parent grid, each ParentItem would display it's respective ChildItems in the child grid.
On the other hand, I was pulling both data sets separately. Basically, I pulled the ParentItems like:
"ParentItems": [
{
"Id": 12345,
"Name" : "Test1"
},
{
"Id": 12346,
"Name" : "Test2"
}
]
And then made a second request to pull the child items, based on the parent's id.
"ChildItems": [
{"Id": 1, "Name": "Test", "ParentId": "12345"},
{"Id": 2, "Name": "Test", "ParentId": "12345"}
]
I was able to modify the server side code to serve the data like in the very first example and managed to get things working. The specific document that helped me out can be found here
I'm looking at this template to build a web application: https://js.devexpress.com/Demos/WidgetsGallery/Demo/PivotGrid/FieldChooser/AngularJS/Light/
In the example there are static data. I have to retrieve them from the server. So, I wrote this:
$scope.testData = [];
$scope.pivotGridDataSource = new DevExpress.data.PivotGridDataSource({
fields: [{
caption: "Nome",
dataField: "fullName",
area: "row"
}, {
caption: "Country",
dataField: "country",
area: "column"
}, {
caption: "Count",
dataField: "countOne",
dataType: "number",
summaryType: "sum",
area: "data"
}],
store: $scope.testData
});
$scope.pivotGridOptions = {
allowSortingBySummary: true,
allowSorting: true,
allowFiltering: true,
showBorders: true,
dataSource: $scope.pivotGridDataSource,
fieldChooser: {
enabled: false
}
},
$scope.fieldChooserOptions = {
dataSource: $scope.pivotGridDataSource,
texts: {
allFields: "All",
columnFields: "Columns",
dataFields: "Data",
rowFields: "Rows",
filterFields: "Filter"
},
width: 400,
height: 400,
bindingOptions: {
layout: "layout"
}
};
// Now I call the server to retrieve data
$scope.getTestData = () => {
$scope.testData.length = 0;
result.forEach(e => {
$scope.testData.push(e);
);
$scope.pivotGridDataSource.reload();
}
$scope.getTestData();
The problem is that when the data are loaded, in the Fields below it shows just the fields written at the beginning (so the name, the count and the country). But I saw in the demo that it should be display ALL parameters of the object.
For example, if the object is so structured:
{ "name": "Test1", "country": "Germany", "creationDate": "xxx", "surname": "yyy" }
So, I expect that in the fields there should be ALL parameters, so name, country, creationDate, surname. So, I did this at the beginning:
I changed $scope.testData = [] into:
$scope.testData = [{ "name": "", "country": "", "creationDate": "", "surname": "" }]
so the component will preparare all fields. And this works. But what if the server gives me back an Object that has another parameters? How can I display them?
I tried so after the calling and before the reload():
let fields = $scope.pivotGridDataSource.fields();
let newField = {
llowExpandAll: false,
allowFiltering: true,
allowSorting: true,
allowSortingBySummary: true,
caption: "This is a new field",
dataField: "newField",
dataType: "string",
displayFolder: "",
index: fields.length
}
$scope.pivotGridDataSource.fields().push(newField);
$scope.pivotGridDataSource.reload();
But it doesn't work yet. Worse, it does not even initialize the Pivot.
The fieldChooser uses the store fields, in this case $scope.testData fields, in your code I see your store is first declared (as null or with some format as you described) and then you have a function to fill it.
I don't know how your code looks and why you create your store that way, but that is basically your problem (the flow).
In the sample code the flow is:
Store with data (static in this case)
PivotGridDataSource
FieldChooser
In your code the flow is:
Store (empty)
PivotGridDataSource
FieldChooser
Store (fill) --> at this point your FieldChooser has been initialized with the fields of the empty version of your store so not much to do (in Jquery you could re-create your object, you dan do it using Jquery within AngularJs see a simple code sample here and below)
$('#chartContainer').dxChart('instance').dispose();
$('#chartContainer').dxPieChart({
...
});
To avoid all of this you can just use the DevExpress.data.CustomStore and your flow will be basically identical to the demo.
give a JSON data like this
{ name: { firstname: 'First Name', lastname: 'Last Name' } }
How can I load this data into ExtJS form field?
First Name: [ First Name ]
Last Name: [ Last Name ]
UPDATE:
after using this technique I arrived at second challenge when post my change back to the server Ext generate json in this format
{ "firstname": "New first name", "lastname": "New last name"}
// instead of
{ "name": { "firstname": "...", "lastname": "..."} }
is it expected behavior or is there anyway I can tell Ext to serialize the object back to the nest form, regards.
P.S: my Edit.js taking from Ext MVC application guide http://localhost/extjs/docs/index.html#!/guide/application_architecture
I suggest you map this into two separate fields in your model definition:
Ext.define("Person", {
extend: "Ext.data.Model",
fields: [
{name: "firstname", mapping: "name.firstname"},
{name: "lastname", mapping: "name.lastname"}
]
});