Develop Reference

foreach Statements with a function

ok I am trying to answer a question and learning to code. regarding an array and using foreach statements the function must remain as this "function animalNames" must stay somewhere but apparently, I am doing something wrong because I get it returned as undefined. even through it produces the correct array back could someone look at it and let me know what i have done wrong.
attached is a picture of the code and array and question that i answered. this is how i wrote my function.
const displayNames = [];
zooAnimals.forEach(function animalNames(element){
var display = "name: " + element.animal_name + ", " + "scientific: " + element.scientific_name
displayNames.push(display);
})
console.log(displayNames);
again i get the correct array back and the data looks correct...but animalNames comes back as undefined...i cannot remove this portion i am to keep it there but i do not know what to do with it.

try this, it defines a function animalNames as separate function
const displayNames = [];
const zooAnimals = [
{animal_name:"Jackel",scientific_name:"Canine"}
]
function animalNames({animal_name, scientific_name}){
return `name: ${animal_name}, scientific: ${scientific_name}`
}
zooAnimals.forEach((element)=>{
displayNames.push(animalNames(element));
})
console.log(displayNames);

I believe you are following this challenge. In this case, make sure to read the instructions properly:
The zoos want to display both the scientific name and the animal name in front of the habitats.
Use animalNames to populate and return the displayNames array with only the animal name and scientific name of each animal.
displayNames will be an array of strings, and each string should follow this pattern: "name: {name}, scientific: {scientific name}"
So from the instructions you are expected to create a function animalNames() that creates an array named displayNames and returns this array from within your function animalNames(). The array displayNames contains strings of the sturcture name: animal_name, scientific: scientific_name.
// you could set zooAnimals as a required parameter in your function
// but as it is defined in the same file you can access it directly as well
function animalNames() {
const displayNames = [];
// you have to do the forEach on zooAnimals here
zooAnimals.forEach(animal => displayNames.push(`name: ${animal.animal_name}, scientific: ${animal.scientific_name}`))
// return an array
return displayNames;
}
The way you did it, the function animalsName() is an anonymous function that only exists within the zooAnimals.forEach() call. Therefore, it is undefined.

Function returning object instead of Array, unable to .Map

I'm parsing an order feed to identify duplicate items bought and group them with a quantity for upload. However, when I try to map the resulting array, it's showing [object Object], which makes me think something's converting the return into an object rather than an array.
The function is as follows:
function compressedOrder (original) {
var compressed = [];
// make a copy of the input array
// first loop goes over every element
for (var i = 0; i < original.length; i++) {
var myCount = 1;
var a = new Object();
// loop over every element in the copy and see if it's the same
for (var w = i+1; w < original.length; w++) {
if (original[w] && original[i]) {
if (original[i].sku == original[w].sku) {
// increase amount of times duplicate is found
myCount++;
delete original[w];
}
}
}
if (original[i]) {
a.sku = original[i].sku;
a.price = original[i].price;
a.qtty = myCount;
compressed.push(a);
}
}
return compressed;
}
And the JS code calling that function is:
contents: compressedOrder(item.lineItems).map(indiv => ({
"id": indiv.sku,
"price": indiv.price,
"quantity": indiv.qtty
}))
The result is:
contents: [ [Object], [Object], [Object], [Object] ]
When I JSON.stringify() the output, I can see that it's pulling the correct info from the function, but I can't figure out how to get the calling function to pull it as an array that can then be mapped rather than as an object.
The correct output, which sits within a much larger feed that gets uploaded, should look like this:
contents:
[{"id":"sku1","price":17.50,"quantity":2},{"id":"sku2","price":27.30,"quantity":3}]
{It's probably something dead simple and obvious, but I've been breaking my head over this (much larger) programme till 4am this morning, so my head's probably not in the right place}

Turns out the code was correct all along, but I was running into a limitation of the console itself. I was able to verify this by simply working with the hard-coded values, and then querying the nested array separately.
Thanks anyway for your help and input everyone.

contents: compressedOrder(item.lineItems).map(indiv => ({
"id": indiv.sku,
"price": indiv.price,
"quantity": indiv.qtty
}))
In the code above the compressedOrder fucntion returns an array of objects where each object has sku, price and qtty attribute.
Further you are using a map on this array and returning an object again which has attributes id, price and quantity.
What do you expect from this.

Not sure what exactly solution you need but I've read your question and the comments, It looks like you need array of arrays as response.
So If I've understood your requirement correctly and you could use lodash then following piece of code might help you:
const _ = require('lodash');
const resp = [{key1:"value1"}, {key2:"value2"}].map(t => _.pairs(t));
console.log(resp);
P.S. It is assumed that compressedOrder response looks like array of objects.

How to convert arrays to objects in javascript?

How could I rewrite this code to object javascript. Since Array usage is prohibed, I can only use objects here. Insted of pushing values to array, I would like to push this values into objects.
var container = [];
document.addEventListener("submit", function(e){
e.preventDefault();
});
window.addEventListener("load",function(){
var submit = document.getElementsByClassName("btn-primary");
submit[0].addEventListener("click",add,false);
document.getElementById("pobrisi").addEventListener("click",deleteAll,false);
var dateElement = document.getElementById('datum');
dateElement.valueAsDate = new Date();
var today = new Date();
var dd = today.getDate();
var mm = today.getMonth()+1;
var yyyy = today.getFullYear();
if(dd<10){
dd='0'+dd
}
if(mm<10){
mm='0'+mm
}
today = yyyy+'-'+mm+'-'+dd;
dateElement.setAttribute("min",today);
});
function add() {
var title = document.getElementById("title").value;
var type = document.getElementById("type").value;
var datum = document.getElementById("datum").value.split("-");
datum = datum[2]+". "+datum[1]+". "+datum[0];
var data = new Book(title,type,datum);
container.push(data.add());
display();
}
function display(data) {
var destination = document.getElementById("list");
var html = "";
for(var i =0;i <container.length; i++) {
html +="<li>"+container[i]+"</li>";
}
destination.innerHTML = html;
}
function deleteAll(){
container=[];
document.getElementById("list").innerHTML="";
}
Wondering if is possible to write this code whitout any array usage.

initial remarks
The problem here, in my estimation, is that you haven't learned the fundamentals of data abstraction yet. If you don't know how to implement an array, you probably shouldn't be depending on one quite yet. Objects and Arrays are so widespread because they're so commonly useful. However, if you don't know what a specific data type is affording you (ie, what convenience does it provide?), then it's probable you will be misusing the type
If you take the code here but techniques like this weren't covered in your class, it will be obvious that you received help from an outside source. Assuming the teacher has a curriculum organized in a sane fashion, you should be able to solve problems based on the material you've already covered.
Based on your code, it's evident you really have tried much, but why do you think that people here will come up with an answer that your teacher will accept? How are we supposed to know what you can use?
a fun exercise nonetheless
OK, so (we think) we need an Array, but let's pretend Arrays don't exist. If we could get this code working below, we might not exactly have an Array, but we'd have something that works like an array.
Most importantly, if we could get this code working below, we'd know what it takes to make a data type that can hold a dynamic number of values. Only then can we begin to truly appreciate what Array is doing for us.
// make a list
let l = list(1) // (1)
// push an item on the end
l = push(l, 2) // (1 2)
// push another item on the end
l = push(l, 3) // (1 2 3)
// display each item of the list
listeach(l, function (x) {
console.log(x)
})
// should output
// 1
// 2
// 3
runnable demo
All we have to do is make that bit of code (above) work without using any arrays. I'll restrict myself even further and only use functions, if/else, and equality test ===. I see these things in your code, so I'm assuming it's OK for me to use them too.
But am I supposed to believe your teacher would let you write code like this? It works, of course, but I don't think it brings you any closer to your answer
var empty = function () {}
function isEmpty (x) {
return x === empty
}
function pair (x,y) {
return function (p) {
return p(x,y)
}
}
function head (p) {
return p(function (x,y) {
return x
})
}
function tail (p) {
return p(function (x,y) {
return y
})
}
function push (l, x) {
if (isEmpty(l))
return list(x)
else
return pair(head(l), push(tail(l), x))
}
function list (x) {
return pair(x, empty)
}
function listeach (l, f) {
if (isEmpty(l))
return null
else
(f(head(l)), listeach(tail(l), f))
}
// make a list
let l = list(1) // (1)
// push an item on the end
l = push(l, 2) // (1 2)
// push another item on the end
l = push(l, 3) // (1 2 3)
// display each item of the list
listeach(l, function (x) {
console.log(x)
})
closing remarks
It appears as tho you can use an Object in lieu of an Array. The accepted answer (at this time) shows a very narrow understanding of how an object could be used to solve your problem. After this contrived demonstration, are you confident that you are using Objects properly and effectively?
Do you know how to implement an object? Could you fulfill this contract (below)? What I mean by that, is could you write the functions object, set, and get such that the following expressions evaluated to their expected result?
In case it's not obvious, you're not allowed to use Object to make it happen. The whole point of the exercise is to make a new data type that you don't already have access to
m = object() // m
set(m, key, x) // m
get(m, key) // x
set(m, key2, y) // m
get(m, key2) // y
set(m, key3, set(object(), key4, z)) // m
get(get(m, key3), key4) // z
I'll leave this as an exercise for you and I strongly encourage you to do it. I think you will learn a lot in the process and develop a deep understanding and appreciation for what higher-level data types like Array or Object give to you

Since this is a homework I feel like I shouldn't solve it for you, but rather help you in the right direction.
Like Slasher mentioned you can use objects
With JavaScript object one book would look something like
const book = {
title: 'my awesome title',
type: 'novel'
};
book is the object
title is a property with a value 'my awesome title'
type is a property with a value 'novel'
But objects can also have other objects as values. Something like
const BookShelf= {
Book1: {
Title: 'my awesome title',
Type: 'novel'
},
Book2: {
Title: 'my horrible title',
Type: 'sci-fi'
}
};
You can reference the books in the bookshelf in two ways
const book1 = BookShelf.Book1 // Returns the book1 object
const title1 = Book1.Title; // Get the title
const sametitle = BookShelf.Book1.Title // Returns title for book1, same as above.
You can also use brackets:
const book1 = BookShelf['Book1'];
const title1 = BookShelf['Book1']['Title];
You can even make new properties on a object like this:
const Book3 = {
Title: 'running out of ideas'
Type: 'memoir'
};
BookShelf['Book3'] = Book3;
Now the BookShelf has a Book3 property. So your BookShelf object looks like
const BookShelf= {
Book1: {
Title: 'my awesome title',
Type: 'novel'
},
Book2: {
Title: 'my horrible title',
Type: 'sci-fi'
},
Book3 = {
Title: 'running out of ideas'
Type: 'memoir'
};
};
That should get you started :)

JavaScript Objects is a good way to go
1- define a new object:
var myVar = {};
or
var myVar = new Object();
2- usage
// insert a new value, it doesn't matter if the value is a string or int or even another object
// set a new value
myVar.myFirstValue="this is my first value";
// get existing value and do what ever you want with it
var value = myVar.myFirstValue

How can I use underscore in name of dynamic object variable

Website that I'm making is in two different languages each data is saved in mongodb with prefix _nl or _en
With a url I need to be able to set up language like that:
http://localhost/en/This-Is-English-Head/This-Is-English-Sub
My code look like that:
var headPage = req.params.headPage;
var subPage = req.params.subPage;
var slug = 'name';
var slugSub = 'subPages.slug_en';
var myObject = {};
myObject[slugSub] = subPage;
myObject[slug] = headPage;
console.log(myObject);
Site.find(myObject,
function (err, pages) {
var Pages = {};
pages.forEach(function (page) {
Pages[page._id] = page;
});
console.log(Pages);
});
After console.log it I get following:
{ 'subPages.slug_en': 'This-Is-English-Sub',
name: 'This-Is-English-Head' }
Is you can see objectname subPages.slug_en is seen as a String insteed of object name..
I know that javascript does not support underscores(I guess?) but I'm still looking for a fix, otherwise i'll be forced to change all underscores in my db to different character...
Edit:
The final result of console.log need to be:
{ subPages.slug_en: 'This-Is-English-Sub',
name: 'This-Is-English-Head' }
Insteed of :
{ 'subPages.slug_en': 'This-Is-English-Sub',
name: 'This-Is-English-Head' }
Otherwise it does not work

The reason you are seeing 'subPages.slug_en' (with string quotes) is because of the . in the object key, not the underscore.
Underscores are definitely supported in object keys without quoting.
Using subPages.slug_en (without string quotes) would require you to have an object as follows:
{ subPages: {slug_en: 'This-Is-English-Sub'},
name: 'This-Is-English-Head' }
Which you could set with the following:
myObject['subPages']['slug_en'] = subPage;
Or simply:
myObject.subPages.slug_en = subPage;

How to concat buffers with delimiter in node.js?

I'm trying to concat two buffers with a space in between them in Node.js.
Here is my code.
var buff1 = new Buffer("Jumping");
var buff2 = new Buffer("Japang");
var buffSpace = new Buffer(1);
buffSpace[0] = "32";
var newBuff = Buffer.concat([buff1, buffSpace, buff2], (buff1.length + buff2.length + buffSpace.length));
console.log(newBuff.toString());
As per official doc, the first argument will be the Array list of Buffer objects. Hence I've created buffSpace for space.
Class Method: Buffer.concat(list[, totalLength])
list : Array List of Buffer objects to concat
totalLength: Number Total length of the buffers when concatenated
I'm getting the result as expected but not sure whether it is right way to do so. Please suggest if any better solution to achieve the same.

There are three changes I would suggest.
First, if you are using Node v6, use Buffer.from() instead of new Buffer(), as the latter is deprecated.
Second, you don't need to pass an argument for totalLength to Buffer.concat(), since it will be calculated automatically from the length of all of the buffers passed. While the docs note it will be faster to pass a total length, this will really only be true if you pass a constant value. What you are doing above is computing the length and then passing that, which is what the concat() function will do internally anyway.
Finally, I would recommend putting this in a function that works like Array.prototype.join(), but for buffers.
function joinBuffers(buffers, delimiter = ' ') {
let d = Buffer.from(delimiter);
return buffers.reduce((prev, b) => Buffer.concat([prev, d, b]));
}
And you can use it like this:
let buf1 = Buffer.from('Foo');
let buf2 = Buffer.from('Bar');
let buf3 = Buffer.from('Baz');
let joined = joinBuffers([buf1, buf2, buf3]);
console.log(joined.toString()); // Foo Bar Baz
Or set a custom delimiter like this:
let joined2 = joinBuffers([buf1, buf2, buf3], ' and ');
console.log(joined2.toString()); // Foo and Bar and Baz

Read the Buffer stream and save it to file as:
const data = [];
req.on('data', stream => {
data.push(stream);
});
req.on('close', () => {
const parsedData = Buffer.concat(data).toString('utf8');
fs.writeFileSync('./test.text', parsedData);
});