I'm trying to add a class on load to an HTML element which is going to be rendered with a functional component in React. When I try to do this with useEffect() it doesn't work since the function runs before I can have access to the element and returns undefined. I've been researching this a whole lot and still can't find a solution. I'm trying something like this:
function myComponent() {
useEffect(() => {
const el = document.querySelectorAll(".item");
const firstEl = el[0];
const lastEl = el[el.length -1];
firstEl.classList.add("red"); // Add class to the first element with class .item
lastEl.classList.add("blue"); // Add class to the last element with class .item
}, [])
return (
<div> // We don't know how many items there are going to be, for simplicity here are three span's
<span className="item">1</span>
<span className="item">2</span>
<span className="item">3</span>
</div>
);
}
This would be fairly easy in plain HTML and javascript, but I'm having difficulties making the code inside useEffect() have access to the elements in the component.
PD: For simplicity, I'm setting the items as three <span>'s, but in reality the items are conditionally rendered and I do not know how many of them are they going to be. Also, I'm aware that you could achieve something similar using css child selectors, and I wish I could use them, the example I gave is just a simplification of the code to make the problem easier to understand, but in my specific case, I need to use javascript selectors and I also need a way to do it in ReactJS.
As I understood, your question is a simplified form of the situation.
You probably have an array of items and you are going to render them.
There is no need to select the first and last item in this way. you can simply filter the valid items for render, then map through them, finally add the proper className to the elements you want. you can find the first and last elements by checking their index inside the map.
Related
In a nutshell I'm trying to target an element within the DOM, then inject a class on the fly to later alter that element.
The situation is as follows, I am working with an application that has predetermined mark up (Manage Engine). It's a tool for system work flows, creating a centralized portal for ticket logging, asset management blah blah. So I use the tool to create templates for end users to log service requests. This is accessed via a web interface portal which in turn obviously has mark up.
So far I have been able to alter specific things such as background colors on table headers for example. I achieve this by creating a rule to fire within that template upon load time. So essentially I am allowing the template to load with its predetermined code and then I am applying a for loop to alter the code once it has loaded. (Hacky I know, however its working really well).
The issue I'm running into now is that certain things within the mark up are generic (no class or id associated to the element). My plan is to target that specific generic element as a variable then add my own class to it upon load. Is there a way to target an element that has a class and then target the child elements within, save that child as a variable to then add a class on the fly with javascript. Please see example below.
<tr class=test1>
<td>
<input>
<input>
<input>
</td>
<tr/>
So with the example above what I am trying to achieve is add my own class with JavaScript to the <td> element. Obviously if i target just <td> it will alter all <td> elements within the markup. Can i get to that specific <td> via the <tr> parent with the test1 class. I am currently unable to use any jquery requests as the base code can not be touched.
Again I know this is a little backwards and hacky but it does work with anything I can specifically target (has a class or id). I need to be able to do this with pure JavaScript. Any suggestions or help is greatly appreciated, apologies if this is a noob approach or question, first time posting in a forum. Let me know if further examples or information is required.
document.querySelector("body").children can get all child elements of body
step1: Select the class. The variable t1 will contain an Array of tr elements.
var t1 = document.querySelector('.test1');
step2: Get the first value from the array t1. So, tr_el1 contains one tr element.
var tr_el1 = t1[0];
step3: Get the children of tr. td_el contains an Array of td elements.
var td_el = tr_el1.children;
Now you can use the td from the td_el array
var tr = document.getElementsByClassName('test1')[0]
var td = tr.children[0]
var inputs = Array.prototype.slice.apply(td.children)
Now you got your inputs inside an array. You're welcome ;-)
Thanks a lot for the assistance, really appreciate it. The examples above helped me build a hybrid that although not exact has given me the outcome i needed.
var parent = document.querySelector(".roweven").children;
var nS;
for (nS = 0; nS < parent.length; nS++) {
parent[nS].style.position = "absolute";
parent[nS].style.width = "100%";
}
I am yet to wrap this up in a function but working as intended. Thanks again :) :)
I see on jquery documentation that I can use .parent() to filter my matched elements based on the parent. But in the process, the final result I get is the set of parent elements, not the original set of elements. So I see that I can use filter to achieve what I want. But I found so few documentation about how to use filter to filter based on the parent.
For example, my html is:
<div id="social">
Facebook<br/>
Twitter<br/>
</div>
<div id="topsites">
Facebook<br/>
Stack Overflow<br/>
</div>
I want to get a set of elements, which consist of <a> tag that has facebook in it's href attribute, but within the social div parents.
I suspect the code will be something like this:
$('a[href*="facebook"]').filter( ... ).click(function() {
});
But I have absolutely no idea what to put on the filter. "parent#social" ?
Another way to put it is to use filter function.
$('a[href*="facebook"]').filter(function(index) {
return ...
}
.click(function() {
});
I also don't know what code to put on the ... . Is it something like this.parent.id == "social" ? If possible, I prefer the first form, but if the solution can only be achieved by using the second form (filter function) then it's okay. Thank you very much.
.parent() doesn't filter, it traverses. It takes a jQuery object, that lists an array (of size [0, n) ), and generates a new jQuery object with each element's parent.
Getting a jQuery object with the list you're looking for is much simpler though...
CSS Selectors, which jQuery is based upon (with various extensions) are heirarchical by nature. That means selecting specific children of some parent(s) is quite trivial. a CSS selector to pick the element you want is:
#social a[href*="facebook"]
and if you use this inside a jQuery constructor, you'll get you object:
$('#social a[href*="facebook"]')
I want to get a set of elements, which consist of <a> tag that has facebook in it's href attribute, but within the social div parents.
No need of filter here,
$('#social a[href*="facebook"]')
will do.
I read through several threads without find a clear answer.
I'm using a JavaScript library (Drinks.js) to put several widgets on my webpage.
The following code will add one single item to my div element pnlThermo:
function create(item) {
var thermo = Drinks.createElement('display');
thermo.setAttribute('id', item);
thermo.setAttribute('label', item);
Drinks.appendChild('pnlThermo', thermo);
}
Well, now I want to add several items to the same div element. No matter if I use a for cycle or call the function explicitly only the first item will be rendered. For example:
create('T1');
create('T2');
create('T3');
leads to show T1 only.
Perhaps I missed something, I'm quite new to JavaScript programming.
Thanks in advanced.
The reference manual ( http://goincompany.com/DTManual01.pdf ) says :
After you have created the HTML element, you have to append it to an
HTML container. In order to do this you have to use the appendChild
function, provided by the Drinks class. Drinks.appendChild('body',
gauge); 'body' is the id of the HTML container. If the parent is an
instrument, this function doesn't work. We have to use the appendChild
method of the instrument, but we'll see this later.
Seems to imply that the first parameter needs to be an HTML tagname, which makes little sense
but then the library is a little wierd IMHO.
I am creating an array of div tags inside the player table div. I'm getting all div tags with class .players. The divs with class name .players have input fieds and a link field inside. I want to be able to manipulate these (remove, add class, etc...)
What I thought would work would be something like:
$(divarray[j]+' .link').hide();
$(divarray[j]+' a').remove('.link');
But it's not working. Any thoughts? I'm sure it's something simple but it's my first time at JS :)
var divarray = $('#player-table > .players');
for( var j = 0; j < 10; j++){
$(divarray[j]).removeClass("players");
$(divarray[j]).addClass("selected_players");
$('#debug').append(divarray[j]);
$(divarray[j]+' a').hide();
}
First of all, you cannot just concatenate jQuery objects or DOM nodes with strings to create new selectors. jQuery provides methods for this kind of situations, where you already have an object or DOM node and want to find other related nodes.
Second, with jQuery there are much better ways to process a set of elements. Here is your code in more jQuery-like way. This is just an example, because I don't know the HTML structure. You have to adjust it so that it selects and applies to the correct elements.
$('#player-table > .players').slice(0,10) // gets the first 10 elements
.removeClass("players") // removes the class from all of them
.addClass("selected_players") // adds the class
.find('a').hide().end() // finds all descendant links and hides them
.appendTo('#debug'); // appends all elements to `#debug`
As you maybe see, there is only one semicolon at the last line. That means this whole code block is just one statement, but splitting it up over several lines increases readability.
It works because of the fluent interface, a concept which jQuery heavily makes use of. It lets you avoid creating jQuery objects over and over again, like you do ($(divarray[j])).
Another advantage is that you can work on the whole set of elements at once and don't have to iterate over every element explicitly like you have to do with "normal" DOM manipulation methods.
For learning JavaScript, I recommend the MDN JavaScript Guide.
jQuery has a couple of tutorials and a very good API documentation.
Read them thoroughly to understand the basics. You cannot expect to be able to use a tool without reading its instructions first.
Try this istructions
$(divarray[j]).find('.link').hide();
$(divarray[j]).find('a').remove('.link');
Try also
$(divarray[j]).find('.link:first').hide();
If you need to work only on the first element
Hope it helps
I'm curious if anyone knows why this piece of jQuery code doesn't remove the images?
var a = $('#tblMain').clone().remove('img');
The table is being selected. This is trying to take the table on the webpage and export to excel but I do not want the images to export.
Thank you,
Do it like this:
$("#tblMain").clone().find("img").remove();
EDIT: Okay, here's the problem:
selector: A selector expression that
filters the set of matched elements to
be removed.
http://api.jquery.com/remove/
The img in .remove('img') is to filter the set of items in the jquery object, NOT to find elements within the items themselves. In this case, the jquery object contains only one item, the cloned table. Therefore, .remove('img') removes nothing, since the jquery object does not contain any images (only images within items it contains).
I don't know what's happening behind the scenes, but you're referring to some variable called img whilst you most probably just want to select all img elements. In that case, you ought to use a selector as a string:
var a = $('#tblMain').clone().remove('img');
EDIT: .clone.remove does not seem to work indeed. I used this workaround which actually works:
.find('img').each(function() {$(this).remove()});