Using ES6 modules in Express - javascript

Is there a way to
write my code using ES6 modules in Express app;
without reverting to babel or #std/esm ?
once I am committed to app.js of Express, I can't find a way to get out of it.
This seems like something that should be already on the web, but all I can find is above options (transpiling, esm).

With node.js, you HAVE to tell it that your main file you are loading is an ESM module. There are a couple ways to do that. The simplest is to just give the main file a .mjs file extension.
// app.mjs
import express from 'express';
const app = express();
app.get("/", (req, res) => {
res.send("hello");
});
app.listen(80);
Then, start your program with:
node app.mjs
This works - I just ran it with node v14.4.0:. The others ways to do it are discussed in the link I previously gave you here. Per that documentation, there are three ways to specify you are loading an ESM module as the top-level module file:
Files ending in .mjs.
Files ending in .js when the nearest parent package.json file contains a top-level field "type" with a value of "module".
Strings passed in as an argument to --eval, or piped to node via STDIN, with the flag --input-type=module.

Related

Node.js - get directory of routes.js

I have my server.js file at let's say directory: /dir1
I start the server with node server.js.
I have my file routes.js in directory /dir1/app/.
I want to get the directory of the server.js file.
I am not too sure how to do this. I can place code that tells me the location of the current script. But what is the current script?
A web app makes use of multiple files. So how do i get the dir of server.js?
EDIT: Here is a code example:
// routes.js
const spawn = require('child_process').spawn;
const fs = require('fs');
module.exports = function(app)
{
//the file upload button does a POST the the '/' route
//i left the arrow function notation for reference
app.post('/', (req, res) => {
if (req.files)
{
var pathAndFileName = '/home/user1/Desktop/app/dataLocation/'+fileName;
As you can see, pathAndFileName is hardcoded.
It works on my system, but it does not for every system.
So i would like to be to get the location of the server.js file (in /dir1), inside the app.js file, so i can the append to the directory the '/dataLocation' + fileName.
If routes.js is in:
/home/user1/Desktop/app/dir1
And, server.js is in:
/home/user1/Desktop/app
And, then the file you're trying to get to is in:
/home/user1/Desktop/app/dataLocation
Then, from routes.js, you can get the directory of server.js with this:
const serverjsDir = path.join(__dirname, ".."); // go up one level
Or, you could get the whole path your edit seems to be looking for (in a dataLocation subdirectory below where server.js is) with this:
const pathAndFileName = path.join(__dirname, '../dataLocation', fileName).
More detail
If you're using CommonJS modules (that use require()), then you can get the current script's directory with __dirname and then it's up to you to know where other resources are relative to your own directory so you can navigate up or down the directory hierarchy from __dirname. For example, if you want to get access to a file main.css in another directory at the same directory level as your script file, you could construct at path like this:
let filePath = path.join(__dirname, "../css/main.css");
But what is the current script?
The current script is the script that contains the code that is accessing __dirname.
A web app makes use of multiple files. Since the place where i want to embed the location (in its code) is located inside routes.js, i guess this is where is should target, am i correct?
It's not clear to me exactly what you mean here. If you can provide a specific example showing what code located in what directory wants to access what file located in what other directory, then we could offer you the precise code to get to that file.
If the code that wants to access this other file is in routes.js, then the location of routes.js would be in __dirname and you would build a relative path from that location as shown above.
To help you understand, __dirname is not a global variable. It's a module-specific variable that contains a different value for every single module location in your project. So, whatever code is running in whatever module will have access to it's own copy of __dirname that specifies the location of that specific code.
To get access routes.js, if it is a module, Im assuming you are using Import or Require, and you could use
require(./app/routes);
If you were to go back a directory, you use ../ as many times as needed. If this is not the answer you were looking for, either reply or someone else may answer

Import JSON file in NodeJs using es6

Hi i'm currently learning nodejs and I try to import a json file like this :
'use strict'
import data from 'users.json'
console.log(data)
Each time I get this error "Cannot find package 'users.json'"
But if I read the file with fs it worked so can you explain me how to do please
try :
import data from './users'
which is the es6 method of doing things or if you want an older syntax method you can try
const data = require('./users')
Okay so the explanation just is this, those fullstops and forward slash are used to indicate relative paths to the file the import is being called from, which means somethings you'd see something like for example ../file/help. The ./ means go up one directory ../ means go up two directories and so on. The name after the slash just tells your program the folder to go in to look for the file to import from so ./folder means go up one directory and enter into the folder directory and so on.
Almost forgot to mention, you should not import from a json file or a text file or any other file that does not have a .js extention(of which you do not actually have to specify) unless absolutely neccessary. To deal with files in node you have to use the fs library.
const fs =require('fs')
....
fs.readFile('./users.json','utf-8',(err,jsonString)=>{
const data = JSON.parse(jsonString);
//whatever other code you may fanacy
}
take a look at the fs module for a list of awesome features you can use to play with files
While the selected answer is correct, here's an explanation that I hope might add some clarity:
import MyModule from 'some-module'
is ES6 import syntax, as opposed to the older CommonJS syntax, which uses require.
CommonJS's require can be used to import files generally; ES6's import statement is more specific, and is generally used for importing js files which meet the criteria for being a module (having an export statement), or specific assets such as CSS sheets. Unlike require, it won't generally work for reading in files that are not modules.
You can't mix CommonJS require and ES6 import in the same file (at least not easily), so if you're using ES6 import and wish to read a file, do so with fs.readFileSync or a similar method. If the file is a json string, you'll need to parse it with JSON.parse().
If you want to use ES6 (NOT CommonJS) module system but want to use the Node.js version which is less than V18 (supports direct json import) then use the below approach.
import { createRequire } from "module";
const require = createRequire(import.meta.url); // construct the require method
const data = require("users.json"); // Now you can use require method in ES6
console.log(data)

Node module dependency

I am new to Nodejs and javascript and not sure yet how to ask the right question.
My main file has a var express = require('express'); on top of it. I am also creating a module that I will be requiring in my main file. I know that module also require the express module. Do I have to import the express module into it or the main file will take care of that?
Modules are completely self contained. Every module has to import the dependencies it needs.

require is not defined? Node.js [duplicate]

This question already has answers here:
Client on Node.js: Uncaught ReferenceError: require is not defined
(11 answers)
Closed 5 months ago.
Just started working with Node.js. In my app/js file, I am doing something like this:
app.js
var http = require('http');
http.createServer(function (request, response) {
response.writeHead(200, {'Content-Type': 'text/plain'});
response.end('Am I really running a server?!');
}).listen(8080, '127.0.0.1');
console.log('running server!');
When I'm in my terminal and run node app.js, the console spits out 'running server!', but in my browser I get, Uncaught ReferenceError: require is not defined.
Can someone explain to me why in the terminal, it works correctly but in the browser, it doesn't?
I am using the node's http-server to serve my page.
This can now also happen in Node.js as of version 14.
It happens when you declare your package type as module in your package.json. If you do this, certain CommonJS variables can't be used, including require.
To fix this, remove "type": "module" from your package.json and make sure you don't have any files ending with .mjs.
In the terminal, you are running the node application and it is running your script. That is a very different execution environment than directly running your script in the browser. While the Javascript language is largely the same (both V8 if you're running the Chrome browser), the rest of the execution environment such as libraries available are not the same.
node.js is a server-side Javascript execution environment that combines the V8 Javascript engine with a bunch of server-side libraries. require() is one such feature that node.js adds to the environment. So, when you run node in the terminal, you are running an environment that contains require().
require() is not a feature that is built into the browser. That is a specific feature of node.js, not of a browser. So, when you try to have the browser run your script, it does not have require().
There are ways to run some forms of node.js code in a browser (but not all). For example, you can get browser substitutes for require() that work similarly (though not identically).
But, you won't be running a web server in your browser as that is not something the browser has the capability to do.
You may be interested in browserify which lets you use node-style modules in a browser using require() statements.
As Abel said, ES Modules in Node >= 14 no longer have require by default.
If you want to add it, put this code at the top of your file:
import { createRequire } from 'module';
const require = createRequire(import.meta.url);
Source: https://nodejs.org/api/modules.html#modules_module_createrequire_filename
Node.JS is a server-side technology, not a browser technology. Thus, Node-specific calls, like require(), do not work in the browser.
See browserify or webpack if you wish to serve browser-specific modules from Node.
Just remove "type":"module" from your package.json.
I solve this by doing this steps:-
step 1: create addRequire.js file at the project root.
step 2: inside addRequire.js add this lines of code
import { createRequire } from "module";
const require = createRequire(import.meta.url);
global.require = require; //this will make require at the global scobe and treat it like the original require
step 3: I imported the file at the app.js file head
import "./start/addRequire.js";
now you have require beside import across the whole project and you can use both anywhere.
Point 1: Add require() function calling line of code only in the app.js file or main.js file.
Point 2: Make sure the required package is installed by checking the pacakage.json file. If not updated, run "npm i".
My mistake: I installed ESLint to my project and made a mistake when I filled out the questionnaire and chose wrong type of modules)
Maybe it will be helpful for someone))
What type of modules does your project use? ยท * commonjs
I solve it, by removing below line from package.json file
"type": "module"
Hope it will solve the problem.

I'd like to reuse code from another module in my Nodejs backend

I'm using the Yeoman Generator Angular Fullstack and I'd like to reuse JS code from different directories within my server directory. I'm referencing the file that has the functions I want like:
var something = require('/.path');
I get the error: "Cannot find module" in my terminal.
I tried a number of variations of the path working through all of the levels from server level down to file level where the given functions are contained. I looked at a few tutorials:
http://www.sitepoint.com/understanding-module-exports-exports-node-js/
AND
https://www.launchacademy.com/codecabulary/learn-javascript/node/modules
I clearly missed something. Each module of my nodejs has a controller with an exports.create function. All of my code for each module is contained within my exports.create function accept for other required modules. I have no problem requiring underscore or other libraries in my Node/Bower modules by the way.
To be as detailed as can be, I expected
var something = require('./directory/directory.controller.js');
var something = require('/.path');
The path you are using is likely incorrect. Probably you want to open the file called path.js contained in the same folder of the file from which you are importing it. In order to do that, you should change the import as follows :
var something = require('./path');
./path is a relative path where . stands for current directory.
/.path is an absolute path. In this case require is importing a hidden file in the root directory. I guess is not what you want.

Categories

Resources