Develop Reference

CKEditor - Editable content CSS interferes with editor toolbar styling

I'm using CKEditor to allow users to edit HTML documents. I need to allow the users to be able to place any kind of CSS or HTML into their documents. When the user's document CSS has !important rules they change the styling of the CKEditor toolbar.
This can be seen here: https://jsfiddle.net/hqpfjzyr/1/
Click on the "Link Preview" and you'll see the buttons of the toolbar are also red.
This behavior is described by the CKEditor docs here (https://docs.ckeditor.com/ckeditor4/latest/guide/skin_sdk_reset.html) but I can't seem to figure out how to apply it. My skin stylesheet includes a reset.css but it doesn't seem to affect the styling.
The only thing that I can think of is to add more CSS targeting the toolbar and explicitly setting every attribute to the correct value with !important rules but that seems like a daunting task.
What am I missing here?

This behavior is described by the CKEditor docs here (https://docs.ckeditor.com/ckeditor4/latest/guide/skin_sdk_reset.html) but I can't seem to figure out how to apply it. My skin stylesheet includes a reset.css but it doesn't seem to affect the styling.
What is described on CKEditor docs doesn't include case with !important flag, because it can't work like you want to. This flag overwrites other css rules including ones in reset file. If you still want to use !important inside editor you might consider to use classic editor instead of inline. Change CKEDITOR.inline( to CKEDITOR.replace. How does that help? Classic editor is rendered inside iframe, which has separate styles that can't affect anything outside it.

Is it possible to override CSS in js

I am using a link generated from a RSS converter (webrss.com), which sits inside a javascript tag at the end of my html. I have needed to convert an RSS feed to HTML for displaying on some digital signage. It works great, except I am having trouble overriding its default styles. I can change .li and .a styles but not font-size in the body or html tags.
I have looked everywhere for a solution and have tried using !important in my CSS but it isn't working. I would like to use an external style sheet and have it override all styles in the js tag at the end of my html.
Is this possible? I'm new to this and am stuck, please help!

Possible they are setting some of the styles inline on the elements eg. <span style="font-size:12px">contents</span> using JS themselves. If they are, there is no way to override it with CSS you'll have to use js your self to override their styles.

Basically, specificity and valid css can be your issue.
Specificity: You can inspect element to see what styles are applying. Assuming your css code is valid, it will show up for the selected element, below the css rules taking precedence above your own. Something like "li {font-size: 11px !important;}" should take precedence above all others, unless there is a more specific selector using the important piece as well.
Validity: For all html elements (li, a, body, html), you select them by just writing them out (ie "html {color: red;}" NOT ".html {color: red;}". I see you've mentioned .li and .a in your question, which may have just been an accident. Note that the dot is not necessary unless it is a class name assigned (ie. ). Check if your css is even listed in the inspector for that element to check if your css is valid.
You can override inline styles with css. The important tag trumps the inline style. See http://css-tricks.com/override-inline-styles-with-css/

The best way to override rule in JS is using CSSOM, I found this lib may help:
https://github.com/cssobj/cssobj
It's render CSSOM from JS, and you can change rules directly from JS.

Disabling Bootstrap CSS inside a certain container, stop overriding css

I am currently using bootstrap and knockoutjs to display a webpage that has a live preview of some data. For instance, a user enters a title, in a textbox, on the left hand side. Then, the right hand side of the page updates to format that text based on some other settings. So it might be something like <h1>{title}</h1> or it might be <u>{title}</u>. However, all that is requested from the user, at this point, is the title in plain text.
The issue is, as the preview is actually a HTML document created by the users. So, some of the bootstrap CSS overrides the CSS specified by the users. So the above <h1> will inherit bootstraps h1 CSS class, rather than using whatever is in the users HTML template. This means at the time of using the created document, the preview may differ to what is actually happening.
JSFiddle example: http://jsfiddle.net/Piercy/4fcmk/
HTML:
<div class="content">
<h1>Header 1</h1>
<div id="Preview">
<!-- Start Html Template -->
<style>
.header
{
color: red;
}
</style>
<h1 class="header">Header Class</h1>
<!-- End Html Template -->
</div>
</div>
CSS:
.content h1
{
color: blue;
}
The user would expect "Header Class" to be red as they do not know anything about the content css. In my code i am using bootstrap but this shows a simplified version of the issue. Normally, you would just make the CSS more specific but because the user doesn't know about bootstrap (or in the jsFiddle example content) we can't really expect them to modify the CSS.
I need to try figure a way to either stop a certain container (preview div in the jsFiddle) using the stylesheet thats being used by it's parent or figure a way i can modify the bootstrap CSS so that overriding issues are less likely.
Of course, sticking it in an iframe would accomplish this but then I will have issues trying to access and modify the preview.
I am open to all ideas, just want to try find the most appropriate way to deal with this situation. I found this rather difficult to put down on paper so I apologise if it is hard to understand.

To my understanding, there is no way to tell CSS to not inherit styles. However, here's an interesting idea for a workaround.
Take the bootstrap.css file and drop it into your CSS preprocessor of choice (I used LESS).
Next, wrap ALL of the styles with an ID or class of bootstrap like this:
#bootstrap { ...all the bootstrap styles go here. }
Then, save it as a .less file and compile it. Your result will be all the bootstrap styles inheriting from #bootstrap or .bootstrap (depending whether you used an ID or class to wrap bootstrap's styles).
Finally, wrap whatever markup in your template that your users will not be editing in a div and give this div an id of #bootstrap or class of .bootstrap, and include only the bootstrap file we just processed using LESS.
That takes care of the user's CSS not inheriting from bootstrap. However, your users can still write styles that bootstrap will inherit. To get around this, wrap the user's content in an id or class of something like #user or .user and ask them to begin all of their styles with .user > likes this:
.user > h1 {color: red;}
.user > p {font-size: 18px;}
This should separate your HTML template's styles from your users' styles - it just takes a little bit more work from your users.
Here's a jsfiddle to demonstrate:

Is their a way to add separate CSS and JS files for a particular part of web page

Is there any way to add separate CSS and Javascript files those work for only particular section of a page and don't affect any other part of the page?
I am attempting to add the following to my web page:
http://codecanyon.net/item/sliderjs-js-framework-for-slider-development/full_screen_preview/1617841
When I used it, the CSS and JS files affect my whole web page.
I don't want this to be happened. I want to add a slider without changing my site totally.
Is there any way to get it working without adding all of the slider's CSS and JS code to my webpage?

Its possible to do this using an iframe as a sort of sandbox. But it begs the question, what are you trying to "protect" the page from? If you have name conflicts, you're best fixing those rather than sandboxing the slider.

If you want to have JS and CSS specific to a certain part of a page, and you don't know JS and CSS, the only way is through iframes.
If you've made the CSS yourself, you can just add a prefix to apply it to on certain sections. Not like this:
p {color:pink}
instead, add a prefix, like this:
#menu p {color:pink}
#content p {color:black}
Your JS should only apply to elements based on id, unless your using something like jQuery. If you're using jQuery you can apply changes only to certain elements in the same way as CSS. eg.
Not like this:
jQuery('p').slider();
instead, add a prefix, like this:
jQuery('#content p').slider();

You can use iframes for this. Create a new page with your CSS and JS file included in it and call that page from iframe.

My styles get overridden by the html I get with ajax

I am building a mass mailer system where you can see a preview of the email before it is sent. I render the email html into a preview box using jquery -- $().html(theHtml).
Html emails use all inline css for their styles. When I fill the html, it overrides some of my css.
I am looking for a solution to completely stop this from happening. Is there any way to self contain the email html/css so it does not affect the entire document?
I understand that adding !important to my styles will do the trick, but it is not a very scalable option.
Thanks in advance.

Unfortunately !important is the only way to override an inline style - that's just how specificity works.
However you might be able to get around it by making all of the "wrapper" CSS (e.g. the CSS for YOUR page, not the HTML email preview) more specific by using IDs and classes etc so that their styles don't get overridden by generic style declarations embedded in the HTML email.
I'm a little confused though - are you trying to override "inline" styles (as in elements with the style="your css here" attribute) or embedded CSS (e.g. "your css here")? If it's the latter, just make important stuff more specific in your own CSS.
Some more info about specificity: http://coding.smashingmagazine.com/2007/07/27/css-specificity-things-you-should-know/
Using an iframe as Sander suggested might be a simpler solution than trying to restructure your CSS specificity rules though.

Are you using the same class/id names for your website and the emails? This should not be the case.

I highly recommend using a pseudo-namespace for your CSS.
Basically, add an arbitrary prefix to your CSS that won't be contained in the inlined 3rd-party content: <div class='foo'> becomes <div class='myapp-foo'>
Having used this practice on our projects recently, it requires only a bit more discipline, but makes the app easier to manage for embedding other content.