react hooks first dispatch causes other muplitple dispatch to fire twice

react hooks first dispatch causes other muplitple dispatch to fire twice - javascript

Wherener I add more that one dispatch to useEffect() it causes all of the following to fire twice. Example below.
Here is the full code. Remove comments in any other order you want
ps. idk how to make it run as a code snippet
pps. I've used this question as an example
import React, { useReducer, useEffect } from "react";
const url = `https://picsum.photos/v2/list?page=3&limit=1`;
function reducer(data, action) {
console.log('reducer triggered', action.type);
switch (action.type) {
case "INITIALIZE":
console.log(action.payload, "Initialize");
return action.payload;
case "ADD_NEW":
const newData = { ...data };
newData.info = newData.info || [];
newData.info.push({});
console.log(newData);
return newData;
case "INI2":
return action.payload;
case "INI3":
return action.payload;
default:
return
}
}
function App() {
const [data, dispatch] = useReducer(reducer, null);
useEffect(() => {
//dispatch({type: "INI2"}); // uncommment this to get 2 reducer messages from each below
console.log("here");
fetch(url)
.then(async response => {
dispatch({type: "INITIALIZE",payload: (await response.json())});
//dispatch({type: "INI3"}); // uncomment this to see that every new dispatch is doubled after first one
})
.catch(error => {console.log(error);});
}, []);
const addNew = () => {
dispatch({ type: "ADD_NEW" });
};
return (
<>
<div>{data ? JSON.stringify(data) : "No Data Yet"}</div>
<button onClick={addNew}>Test</button>
</>
);
}
export default App

This is just a result of React.StrictMode being present in your App
According to the React Documentation
Strict mode can’t automatically detect side effects for you, but it
can help you spot them by making them a little more deterministic.
This is done by intentionally double-invoking the functions
And Functions passed to useState, useMemo, or useReducer are part of double invocation, which is why you see that behavior in your case
Expected Working demo without React.StrictMode

Related

context api - useEffect doesn't fire on first render - react native

The useEffect doesn't fire on first render, but when I save the file (ctrl+s), the state updates and the results can be seen.
What I want to do is, when I'm in GameScreen, I tap on an ICON which takes me to WalletScreen, from there I can select some items/gifts (attachedGifts - in context) and after finalising I go back to previous screen i.e. GameScreen with gifts attached (attachedGifts!==null), now again when I tap ICON and go to WalletScreen it should show me the gifts that were attached so that I could un-attach them or update selection (this is being done in the useEffect below in WalletScreen), but the issue is, although my attachedGifts state is updating, the useEffect in WalletScreen does not fire immediately when navigated, when I hit ctrl+s to save the file, then I can see my selected/attached gifts in WalletScreen.
code:
const Main = () => {
return (
<GiftsProvider>
<Stack.Screen name='WalletScreen' component={WalletScreen} />
<Stack.Screen name='GameScreen' component={GameScreen} />
</GiftsProvider>
)
};
const GameScreen = () => {
const { attachedGifts } = useGifts(); //coming from context - GiftsProvider
console.log('attached gifts: ', attachedGifts);
return ...
};
const WalletScreen = () => {
const { attachedGifts } = useGifts();
useEffect(() => { // does not fire on initial render, after saving the file, then it works.
if (attachedGifts !== null) {
let selectedIndex = -1
let filteredArray = data.map(val => {
if (val.id === attachedGifts.id) {
selectedIndex = walletData.indexOf(val);
setSelectedGiftIndex(selectedIndex);
return {
...val,
isSelect: val?.isSelect ? !val?.isSelect : true,
};
} else {
return { ...val, isSelect: false };
}
});
setData(filteredArray);
}
}, [attachedGifts]);
const attachGiftsToContext = (obj) => {
dispatch(SET_GIFTS(obj));
showToast('Gifts attached successfully!');
navigation?.goBack(); // goes back to GameScreen
}
return (
// somewhere in between
<TouchableOpacity onPress={attachGiftsToContext}>ATTACH</TouchableOpacity>
)
};
context:
import React, { createContext, useContext, useMemo, useReducer } from 'react';
const GiftsReducer = (state: Object | null, action) => {
switch (action.type) {
case 'SET_GIFTS':
return action.payload;
default:
return state;
}
};
const GiftContext = createContext({});
export const GiftsProvider = ({ children }) => {
const initialGiftState: Object | null = null;
const [attachedGifts, dispatch] = useReducer(
GiftsReducer,
initialGiftState,
);
const memoedValue = useMemo(
() => ({
attachedGifts,
dispatch,
}),
[attachedGifts],
);
return (
<GiftContext.Provider value={memoedValue}>
{children}
</GiftContext.Provider>
);
};
export default function () {
return useContext(GiftContext);
}
Output of console.log in GameScreen:
attached gifts: Object {
"reciptId": "baNlCz6KFVABxYNHAHasd213Fu1",
"walletId": "KQCqSqC3cowZ987663QJboZ",
}
What could possibly be the reason behind this and how do I solve this?
EDIT
Added related code here: https://snack.expo.dev/uKfDPpNDr

From the docs
When you call useEffect in your component, this is effectively queuing
or scheduling an effect to maybe run, after the render is done.
After rendering finishes, useEffect will check the list of dependency
values against the values from the last render, and will call your
effect function if any one of them has changed.
You might want to take a different approach to this.
There is not much info, but I can try to suggest to put it into render, so it might look like this
const filterAttachedGifts = useMemo(() => ...your function from useEffect... , [attachedGitfs])
Some where in render you use "data" variable to render attached gifts, instead, put filterAttachedGifts function there.
Or run this function in component body and then render the result.
const filteredAttachedGifts = filterAttachedGifts()
It would run on first render and also would change on each attachedGifts change.
If this approach doesn't seems like something that you expected, please, provide more code and details
UPDATED
I assume that the problem is that your wallet receive attachedGifts on first render, and after it, useEffect check if that value was changed, and it doesn't, so it wouldn't run a function.
You can try to move your function from useEffect into external function and use that function in 2 places, in useEffect and in wallet state as a default value
feel free to pick up a better name instead of "getUpdatedArray"
const getUpdatedArray = () => {
const updatedArray = [...walletData];
if (attachedGifts !== null) {
let selectedIndex = -1
updatedArray = updatedArray.map((val: IWalletListDT) => {
if (val?.walletId === attachedGifts?.walletIds) {
selectedIndex = walletData.indexOf(val);
setSelectedGiftIndex(selectedIndex);
setPurchaseDetailDialog(val);
return {
...val,
isSelect: val?.isSelect ? !val?.isSelect : true,
};
} else {
return { ...val, isSelect: false };
}
});
}
return updatedArray;
}
Then use it here
const [walletData, setWalletData] = useState(getUpdatedArray());
and in your useEffect
useEffect(() => {
setWalletData(getUpdatedArray());
}, [attachedGifts]);
That update should cover the data on first render. That might be not the best solution, but it might help you. Better solution require more code\time etc.

reactjs passing value to useEffect from useSelector

I am building a reactjs app
I want to get my user id from redux state
using useSelector and pass it to useEffect
My code
UserReducer
export function userReducer(state = { token: "", user: {} }, action) {
switch (action.type) {
case "LOGIN":
return action.payload;
case "LOGOUT":
return action.payload;
default:
return state;
}
}
ViewTransaction.jsx
const ViewTransaction = () => {
const user_id = useSelector((state) => state.user.user.id);
const params = useParams();
useEffect(() => {
setLoading(true);
PendingServices.getPendingTransaction(
`localhost:8000/user/transaction/pending/get-transaction/${params.id}?user_id=${user_id}`
)
.then((response) => {})
.catch((error) => {})
.finally(() => {
setLoading(false);
});
}, []);
return (
<div>transaction</div>
)
}
export default ViewTransaction;
user_id is showing undefined.

You need to pass user_id in useEffects dependency array and check if its defined or nod... because on first render its undefined because redux didnt provided it yet
useEffect(() => {
if(user_id){
setLoading(true);
PendingServices.getPendingTransaction(
`localhost:8000/user/transaction/pending/get-transaction/${params.id}?user_id=${user_id}`
)
.then((response) => {})
.catch((error) => {})
.finally(() => {
setLoading(false);
});
}
}, [user_id]);

Like Drew wrote in the comment above your dependency array is missing variables. React tries to be smart about not calling hooks in vain, and by passing it no dependencies you let it assume that the call to the method in useEffect will always be the same, and that it can cache and reuse the result of the invocation. Since user_id is undefined initially, when no one have logged in, the result of useEffect with an undefined user is cached.
By adding user_id and params.id in the dep array you're telling React that "each time these variables change, the result of the method should also change", so it will invalidate the cached useEffect result and run the method again.
I'd recommend using this eslint plugin to automatically help catch these cases: https://www.npmjs.com/package/eslint-plugin-react-hooks

Not able to figure out this error: Can't perform a React state update on an unmounted component [duplicate]

Problem
I am writing an application in React and was unable to avoid a super common pitfall, which is calling setState(...) after componentWillUnmount(...).
I looked very carefully at my code and tried to put some guarding clauses in place, but the problem persisted and I am still observing the warning.
Therefore, I've got two questions:
How do I figure out from the stack trace, which particular component and event handler or lifecycle hook is responsible for the rule violation?
Well, how to fix the problem itself, because my code was written with this pitfall in mind and is already trying to prevent it, but some underlying component's still generating the warning.
Browser console
Warning: Can't perform a React state update on an unmounted component.
This is a no-op, but it indicates a memory leak in your application.
To fix, cancel all subscriptions and asynchronous tasks in the componentWillUnmount
method.
in TextLayerInternal (created by Context.Consumer)
in TextLayer (created by PageInternal) index.js:1446
d/console[e]
index.js:1446
warningWithoutStack
react-dom.development.js:520
warnAboutUpdateOnUnmounted
react-dom.development.js:18238
scheduleWork
react-dom.development.js:19684
enqueueSetState
react-dom.development.js:12936
./node_modules/react/cjs/react.development.js/Component.prototype.setState
react.development.js:356
_callee$
TextLayer.js:97
tryCatch
runtime.js:63
invoke
runtime.js:282
defineIteratorMethods/</prototype[method]
runtime.js:116
asyncGeneratorStep
asyncToGenerator.js:3
_throw
asyncToGenerator.js:29
Code
Book.tsx
import { throttle } from 'lodash';
import * as React from 'react';
import { AutoWidthPdf } from '../shared/AutoWidthPdf';
import BookCommandPanel from '../shared/BookCommandPanel';
import BookTextPath from '../static/pdf/sde.pdf';
import './Book.css';
const DEFAULT_WIDTH = 140;
class Book extends React.Component {
setDivSizeThrottleable: () => void;
pdfWrapper: HTMLDivElement | null = null;
isComponentMounted: boolean = false;
state = {
hidden: true,
pdfWidth: DEFAULT_WIDTH,
};
constructor(props: any) {
super(props);
this.setDivSizeThrottleable = throttle(
() => {
if (this.isComponentMounted) {
this.setState({
pdfWidth: this.pdfWrapper!.getBoundingClientRect().width - 5,
});
}
},
500,
);
}
componentDidMount = () => {
this.isComponentMounted = true;
this.setDivSizeThrottleable();
window.addEventListener("resize", this.setDivSizeThrottleable);
};
componentWillUnmount = () => {
this.isComponentMounted = false;
window.removeEventListener("resize", this.setDivSizeThrottleable);
};
render = () => (
<div className="Book">
{ this.state.hidden && <div className="Book__LoadNotification centered">Book is being loaded...</div> }
<div className={this.getPdfContentContainerClassName()}>
<BookCommandPanel
bookTextPath={BookTextPath}
/>
<div className="Book__PdfContent" ref={ref => this.pdfWrapper = ref}>
<AutoWidthPdf
file={BookTextPath}
width={this.state.pdfWidth}
onLoadSuccess={(_: any) => this.onDocumentComplete()}
/>
</div>
<BookCommandPanel
bookTextPath={BookTextPath}
/>
</div>
</div>
);
getPdfContentContainerClassName = () => this.state.hidden ? 'hidden' : '';
onDocumentComplete = () => {
try {
this.setState({ hidden: false });
this.setDivSizeThrottleable();
} catch (caughtError) {
console.warn({ caughtError });
}
};
}
export default Book;
AutoWidthPdf.tsx
import * as React from 'react';
import { Document, Page, pdfjs } from 'react-pdf';
pdfjs.GlobalWorkerOptions.workerSrc = `//cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/pdf.js/${pdfjs.version}/pdf.worker.js`;
interface IProps {
file: string;
width: number;
onLoadSuccess: (pdf: any) => void;
}
export class AutoWidthPdf extends React.Component<IProps> {
render = () => (
<Document
file={this.props.file}
onLoadSuccess={(_: any) => this.props.onLoadSuccess(_)}
>
<Page
pageNumber={1}
width={this.props.width}
/>
</Document>
);
}
Update 1: Cancel throttleable function (still no luck)
const DEFAULT_WIDTH = 140;
class Book extends React.Component {
setDivSizeThrottleable: ((() => void) & Cancelable) | undefined;
pdfWrapper: HTMLDivElement | null = null;
state = {
hidden: true,
pdfWidth: DEFAULT_WIDTH,
};
componentDidMount = () => {
this.setDivSizeThrottleable = throttle(
() => {
this.setState({
pdfWidth: this.pdfWrapper!.getBoundingClientRect().width - 5,
});
},
500,
);
this.setDivSizeThrottleable();
window.addEventListener("resize", this.setDivSizeThrottleable);
};
componentWillUnmount = () => {
window.removeEventListener("resize", this.setDivSizeThrottleable!);
this.setDivSizeThrottleable!.cancel();
this.setDivSizeThrottleable = undefined;
};
render = () => (
<div className="Book">
{ this.state.hidden && <div className="Book__LoadNotification centered">Book is being loaded...</div> }
<div className={this.getPdfContentContainerClassName()}>
<BookCommandPanel
BookTextPath={BookTextPath}
/>
<div className="Book__PdfContent" ref={ref => this.pdfWrapper = ref}>
<AutoWidthPdf
file={BookTextPath}
width={this.state.pdfWidth}
onLoadSuccess={(_: any) => this.onDocumentComplete()}
/>
</div>
<BookCommandPanel
BookTextPath={BookTextPath}
/>
</div>
</div>
);
getPdfContentContainerClassName = () => this.state.hidden ? 'hidden' : '';
onDocumentComplete = () => {
try {
this.setState({ hidden: false });
this.setDivSizeThrottleable!();
} catch (caughtError) {
console.warn({ caughtError });
}
};
}
export default Book;

Here is a React Hooks specific solution for
Error
Warning: Can't perform a React state update on an unmounted component.
Solution
You can declare let isMounted = true inside useEffect, which will be changed in the cleanup callback, as soon as the component is unmounted. Before state updates, you now check this variable conditionally:
useEffect(() => {
let isMounted = true; // note mutable flag
someAsyncOperation().then(data => {
if (isMounted) setState(data); // add conditional check
})
return () => { isMounted = false }; // cleanup toggles value, if unmounted
}, []); // adjust dependencies to your needs
const Parent = () => {
const [mounted, setMounted] = useState(true);
return (
<div>
Parent:
<button onClick={() => setMounted(!mounted)}>
{mounted ? "Unmount" : "Mount"} Child
</button>
{mounted && <Child />}
<p>
Unmount Child, while it is still loading. It won't set state later on,
so no error is triggered.
</p>
</div>
);
};
const Child = () => {
const [state, setState] = useState("loading (4 sec)...");
useEffect(() => {
let isMounted = true;
fetchData();
return () => {
isMounted = false;
};
// simulate some Web API fetching
function fetchData() {
setTimeout(() => {
// drop "if (isMounted)" to trigger error again
// (take IDE, doesn't work with stack snippet)
if (isMounted) setState("data fetched")
else console.log("aborted setState on unmounted component")
}, 4000);
}
}, []);
return <div>Child: {state}</div>;
};
ReactDOM.render(<Parent />, document.getElementById("root"));
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/react/16.13.0/umd/react.production.min.js" integrity="sha256-32Gmw5rBDXyMjg/73FgpukoTZdMrxuYW7tj8adbN8z4=" crossorigin="anonymous"></script>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/react-dom/16.13.0/umd/react-dom.production.min.js" integrity="sha256-bjQ42ac3EN0GqK40pC9gGi/YixvKyZ24qMP/9HiGW7w=" crossorigin="anonymous"></script>
<div id="root"></div>
<script>var { useReducer, useEffect, useState, useRef } = React</script>
Extension: Custom useAsync Hook
We can encapsulate all the boilerplate into a custom Hook, that automatically aborts async functions in case the component unmounts or dependency values have changed before:
function useAsync(asyncFn, onSuccess) {
useEffect(() => {
let isActive = true;
asyncFn().then(data => {
if (isActive) onSuccess(data);
});
return () => { isActive = false };
}, [asyncFn, onSuccess]);
}
// custom Hook for automatic abortion on unmount or dependency change
// You might add onFailure for promise errors as well.
function useAsync(asyncFn, onSuccess) {
useEffect(() => {
let isActive = true;
asyncFn().then(data => {
if (isActive) onSuccess(data)
else console.log("aborted setState on unmounted component")
});
return () => {
isActive = false;
};
}, [asyncFn, onSuccess]);
}
const Child = () => {
const [state, setState] = useState("loading (4 sec)...");
useAsync(simulateFetchData, setState);
return <div>Child: {state}</div>;
};
const Parent = () => {
const [mounted, setMounted] = useState(true);
return (
<div>
Parent:
<button onClick={() => setMounted(!mounted)}>
{mounted ? "Unmount" : "Mount"} Child
</button>
{mounted && <Child />}
<p>
Unmount Child, while it is still loading. It won't set state later on,
so no error is triggered.
</p>
</div>
);
};
const simulateFetchData = () => new Promise(
resolve => setTimeout(() => resolve("data fetched"), 4000));
ReactDOM.render(<Parent />, document.getElementById("root"));
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/react/16.13.0/umd/react.production.min.js" integrity="sha256-32Gmw5rBDXyMjg/73FgpukoTZdMrxuYW7tj8adbN8z4=" crossorigin="anonymous"></script>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/react-dom/16.13.0/umd/react-dom.production.min.js" integrity="sha256-bjQ42ac3EN0GqK40pC9gGi/YixvKyZ24qMP/9HiGW7w=" crossorigin="anonymous"></script>
<div id="root"></div>
<script>var { useReducer, useEffect, useState, useRef } = React</script>
More on effect cleanups: Overreacted: A Complete Guide to useEffect

To remove - Can't perform a React state update on an unmounted component warning, use componentDidMount method under a condition and make false that condition on componentWillUnmount method. For example : -
class Home extends Component {
_isMounted = false;
constructor(props) {
super(props);
this.state = {
news: [],
};
}
componentDidMount() {
this._isMounted = true;
ajaxVar
.get('https://domain')
.then(result => {
if (this._isMounted) {
this.setState({
news: result.data.hits,
});
}
});
}
componentWillUnmount() {
this._isMounted = false;
}
render() {
...
}
}

If above solutions dont work, try this and it works for me:
componentWillUnmount() {
// fix Warning: Can't perform a React state update on an unmounted component
this.setState = (state,callback)=>{
return;
};
}

There is a hook that's fairly common called useIsMounted that solves this problem (for functional components)...
import { useRef, useEffect } from 'react';
export function useIsMounted() {
const isMounted = useRef(false);
useEffect(() => {
isMounted.current = true;
return () => isMounted.current = false;
}, []);
return isMounted;
}
then in your functional component
function Book() {
const isMounted = useIsMounted();
...
useEffect(() => {
asyncOperation().then(data => {
if (isMounted.current) { setState(data); }
})
});
...
}

Checking if a component is mounted is actually an anti pattern as per React documentation. The solution to the setState warning is rather to leverage on the use of an AbortController:
useEffect(() => {
const abortController = new AbortController() // creating an AbortController
fetch(url, { signal: abortController.signal }) // passing the signal to the query
.then(data => {
setState(data) // if everything went well, set the state
})
.catch(error => {
if (error.name === 'AbortError') return // if the query has been aborted, do nothing
throw error
})
return () => {
abortController.abort() // stop the query by aborting on the AbortController on unmount
}
}, [])
For asynchronous operations that aren't based on the Fetch API, there still should be a way to cancel these asynchronous operations, and you should rather leverage these than just checking if a component is mounted. If you are building your own API, you can implement the AbortController API in it to handle it.
For more context, the check if a component is mounted is an anti pattern as React is checking internally if the component is mounted to display that warning. Doing the same check again is just a way to hide the warning, and there are some easier ways to hide them than adding this piece of code on a big part of a codebase.
Source: https://medium.com/doctolib/react-stop-checking-if-your-component-is-mounted-3bb2568a4934

I had this warning possibly because of calling setState from an effect hook (This is discussed in these 3 issues linked together).
Anyway, upgrading the react version removed the warning.

React already removed this warning
but here is a better solution (not just workaround)
useEffect(() => {
const abortController = new AbortController() // creating an AbortController
fetch(url, { signal: abortController.signal }) // passing the signal to the query
.then(data => {
setState(data) // if everything went well, set the state
})
.catch(error => {
if (error.name === 'AbortError') return // if the query has been aborted, do nothing
throw error
})
return () => {
abortController.abort()
}
}, [])

The solution from #ford04 didn't worked to me and specially if you need to use the isMounted in multiple places (multiple useEffect for instance), it's recommended to useRef, as bellow:
Essential packages
"dependencies":
{
"react": "17.0.1",
}
"devDependencies": {
"typescript": "4.1.5",
}
My Hook Component
export const SubscriptionsView: React.FC = () => {
const [data, setData] = useState<Subscription[]>();
const isMounted = React.useRef(true);
React.useEffect(() => {
if (isMounted.current) {
// fetch data
// setData (fetch result)
return () => {
isMounted.current = false;
};
}
}
});

try changing setDivSizeThrottleable to
this.setDivSizeThrottleable = throttle(
() => {
if (this.isComponentMounted) {
this.setState({
pdfWidth: this.pdfWrapper!.getBoundingClientRect().width - 5,
});
}
},
500,
{ leading: false, trailing: true }
);

I know that you're not using history, but in my case I was using the useHistory hook from React Router DOM, which unmounts the component before the state is persisted in my React Context Provider.
To fix this problem I have used the hook withRouter nesting the component, in my case export default withRouter(Login), and inside the component const Login = props => { ...; props.history.push("/dashboard"); .... I have also removed the other props.history.push from the component, e.g, if(authorization.token) return props.history.push('/dashboard') because this causes a loop, because the authorization state.
An alternative to push a new item to history.

Add a ref to a jsx component and then check it exist
function Book() {
const ref = useRef();
useEffect(() => {
asyncOperation().then(data => {
if (ref.current) setState(data);
})
});
return <div ref={ref}>content</div>
}

I had a similar issue thanks #ford04 helped me out.
However, another error occurred.
NB. I am using ReactJS hooks
ndex.js:1 Warning: Cannot update during an existing state transition (such as within `render`). Render methods should be a pure function of props and state.
What causes the error?
import {useHistory} from 'react-router-dom'
const History = useHistory()
if (true) {
history.push('/new-route');
}
return (
<>
<render component />
</>
)
This could not work because despite you are redirecting to new page all state and props are being manipulated on the dom or simply rendering to the previous page did not stop.
What solution I found
import {Redirect} from 'react-router-dom'
if (true) {
return <redirect to="/new-route" />
}
return (
<>
<render component />
</>
)

If you are fetching data from axios and the error still occurs, just wrap the setter inside the condition
let isRendered = useRef(false);
useEffect(() => {
isRendered = true;
axios
.get("/sample/api")
.then(res => {
if (isRendered) {
setState(res.data);
}
return null;
})
.catch(err => console.log(err));
return () => {
isRendered = false;
};
}, []);

I have 2 solutions for this error:
return:
If you are used hook and useEffect, So put a return end of useEffect.
useEffect(() => {
window.addEventListener('mousemove', logMouseMove)
return () => {
window.removeEventListener('mousemove', logMouseMove)
}
}, [])
componentWillUnmount:
If you are used componentDidMount, So put componentWillUnmount next to it.
componentDidMount() {
window.addEventListener('mousemove', this.logMouseMove)
}
componentWillUnmount() {
window.removeEventListener('mousemove', this.logMouseMove)
}

The isMounted approach is an anti-pattern in most cases because it doesn't actually clean up/cancel anything, it just avoids changing state on unmounted components, but does nothing with pending asynchronous tasks. The React team recently removed the leak warning because users keep creating a lot of anti-patterns to hide the warning rather than fix its cause.
But writing cancellable code in plain JS can be really tricky. To fix this I made my own lib useAsyncEffect2 with custom hooks, built on top of a cancellable promise (c-promise2) for executing cancellable async code to reach its graceful cancellation. All async stages (promises), including deep ones, are cancellable. This means that the request here will be automatically aborted if its parent context is canceled. Of course, any other asynchronous operation can be used instead of a request.
useAsyncEffect Demo with plain useState usage (Live Demo):
import React, { useState } from "react";
import { useAsyncEffect } from "use-async-effect2";
import cpAxios from "cp-axios";
function TestComponent({url}) {
const [text, setText] = useState("");
const cancel = useAsyncEffect(
function* () {
setText("fetching...");
const json = (yield cpAxios(url)).data;
setText(`Success: ${JSON.stringify(json)}`);
},
[url]
);
return (
<div>
<div>{text}</div>
<button onClick={cancel}>
Cancel request
</button>
</div>
);
}
useAsyncEffect Demo with internal states usage (Live Demo):
import React from "react";
import { useAsyncEffect } from "use-async-effect2";
import cpAxios from "cp-axios";
function TestComponent({ url, timeout }) {
const [cancel, done, result, err] = useAsyncEffect(
function* () {
return (yield cpAxios(url).timeout(timeout)).data;
},
{ states: true, deps: [url] }
);
return (
<div>
{done ? (err ? err.toString() : JSON.stringify(result)) : "loading..."}
<button onClick={cancel} disabled={done}>
Cancel async effect (abort request)
</button>
</div>
);
}
Class component using decorators (Live demo)
import React, { Component } from "react";
import { ReactComponent } from "c-promise2";
import cpAxios from "cp-axios";
#ReactComponent
class TestComponent extends Component {
state = {
text: ""
};
*componentDidMount(scope) {
const { url, timeout } = this.props;
const response = yield cpAxios(url).timeout(timeout);
this.setState({ text: JSON.stringify(response.data, null, 2) });
}
render() {
return (<div>{this.state.text}</div>);
}
}
export default TestComponent;
More other examples:
Axios request with errors handling
Fetch weather by coords
Live search
Pause & Resume
Progress capturing

Edit: I just realized the warning is referencing a component called TextLayerInternal. That's likely where your bug is. The rest of this is still relevant, but it might not fix your problem.
1) Getting the instance of a component for this warning is tough. It looks like there is some discussion to improve this in React but there currently is no easy way to do it. The reason it hasn't been built yet, I suspect, is likely because components are expected to be written in such a way that setState after unmount isn't possible no matter what the state of the component is. The problem, as far as the React team is concerned, is always in the Component code and not the Component instance, which is why you get the Component Type name.
That answer might be unsatisfactory, but I think I can fix your problem.
2) Lodashes throttled function has a cancel method. Call cancel in componentWillUnmount and ditch the isComponentMounted. Canceling is more "idiomatically" React than introducing a new property.

UPDATE DO NOT USE MY ORIGINAL ANSWER AS IT DOES NOT WORK
This answer was based on the use of cancelable promises and a note in makecancelable which I migrated to use hooks. However, it appears it does not cancel a chain of async/await and even cancelable-promise does not support canceling of a chain of awaits
Doing a bit more research on this, it appears that some internal Google reasons prevented cancelable promises from coming into the standard.
Further more, there was some promise with Bluebird which introduces cancelable promises, but it does not work in Expo or at least I haven't seen an example of it working in Expo.
The accepted answer is the best. Since I use TypeScript I had adapted the code with a few modifications (I explicitly set the dependencies since the accepted answer's implicit dependencies appear to give a re-render loop on my app, added and use async/await rather than promise chain, pass a ref to the mounted object so that an async/await chain can be canceled earlier if needed)
/**
* This starts an async function and executes another function that performs
* React state changes if the component is still mounted after the async
* operation completes
* #template T
* #param {(mountedRef: React.MutableRefObject<boolean>) => Promise<T>} asyncFunction async function,
* it has a copy of the mounted ref so an await chain can be canceled earlier.
* #param {(asyncResult: T) => void} onSuccess this gets executed after async
* function is resolved and the component is still mounted
* #param {import("react").DependencyList} deps
*/
export function useAsyncSetEffect(asyncFunction, onSuccess, deps) {
const mountedRef = useRef(false);
useEffect(() => {
mountedRef.current = true;
(async () => {
const x = await asyncFunction(mountedRef);
if (mountedRef.current) {
onSuccess(x);
}
})();
return () => {
mountedRef.current = false;
};
}, deps);
}
Original answer
Since I have many different operations that are async, I use the cancelable-promise package to resolve this issue with minimal code changes.
Previous code:
useEffect(() =>
(async () => {
const bar = await fooAsync();
setSomeState(bar);
})(),
[]
);
New code:
import { cancelable } from "cancelable-promise";
...
useEffect(
() => {
const cancelablePromise = cancelable(async () => {
const bar = await fooAsync();
setSomeState(bar);
})
return () => cancelablePromise.cancel();
},
[]
);
You can alsowrpte it in a custom utility function like this
/**
* This wraps an async function in a cancelable promise
* #param {() => PromiseLike<void>} asyncFunction
* #param {React.DependencyList} deps
*/
export function useCancelableEffect(asyncFunction, deps) {
useEffect(() => {
const cancelablePromise = cancelable(asyncFunction());
return () => cancelablePromise.cancel();
}, deps);
}

In my case of a login-like screen, the fetch was done in a onClick handler of a parent component, who passed that handler down to the child, whom placed .catch and .finally on it.
In the .then case a redirect (and hence unmount) would happen as normal operation, and only in cases of fetch error would the child stay mounted on-screen.
My solution was moving the setState and all other code from the .finally to the .catch since the child is guaranteed to be mounted in the .catch case. And in the .then case nothing needed doing because of the guaranteed unmount.

Based on #ford04 answer, here is the same encapsulated in a method :
import React, { FC, useState, useEffect, DependencyList } from 'react';
export function useEffectAsync( effectAsyncFun : ( isMounted: () => boolean ) => unknown, deps?: DependencyList ) {
useEffect( () => {
let isMounted = true;
const _unused = effectAsyncFun( () => isMounted );
return () => { isMounted = false; };
}, deps );
}
Usage:
const MyComponent : FC<{}> = (props) => {
const [ asyncProp , setAsyncProp ] = useState( '' ) ;
useEffectAsync( async ( isMounted ) =>
{
const someAsyncProp = await ... ;
if ( isMounted() )
setAsyncProp( someAsyncProp ) ;
});
return <div> ... ;
} ;

Depending on how you open your webpage, you may not be causing a mounting. Such as using a <Link/> back to a page that was already mounted in the virtual DOM, so requiring data from a componentDidMount lifecycle is caught.

Here is a simple solution for this. This warning is due to when we do some fetch request while that request is in the background (because some requests take some time.)and we navigate back from that screen then they react cannot update the state. here is the example code for this. write this line before every state Update.
if(!isScreenMounted.current) return;
Here is the Complete Code
import React , {useRef} from 'react'
import { Text,StatusBar,SafeAreaView,ScrollView, StyleSheet } from 'react-native'
import BASEURL from '../constants/BaseURL';
const SearchScreen = () => {
const isScreenMounted = useRef(true)
useEffect(() => {
return () => isScreenMounted.current = false
},[])
const ConvertFileSubmit = () => {
if(!isScreenMounted.current) return;
setUpLoading(true)
var formdata = new FormData();
var file = {
uri: `file://${route.params.selectedfiles[0].uri}`,
type:`${route.params.selectedfiles[0].minetype}`,
name:`${route.params.selectedfiles[0].displayname}`,
};
formdata.append("file",file);
fetch(`${BASEURL}/UploadFile`, {
method: 'POST',
body: formdata,
redirect: 'manual'
}).then(response => response.json())
.then(result => {
if(!isScreenMounted.current) return;
setUpLoading(false)
}).catch(error => {
console.log('error', error)
});
}
return(
<>
<StatusBar barStyle="dark-content" />
<SafeAreaView>
<ScrollView
contentInsetAdjustmentBehavior="automatic"
style={styles.scrollView}>
<Text>Search Screen</Text>
</ScrollView>
</SafeAreaView>
</>
)
}
export default SearchScreen;
const styles = StyleSheet.create({
scrollView: {
backgroundColor:"red",
},
container:{
flex:1,
justifyContent:"center",
alignItems:"center"
}
})

I solved this problem by providing all the params that are used in the useEffect hook
The code reported the bug:
useEffect(() => {
getDistrict({
geonameid: countryId,
subdistrict: level,
}).then((res) => {
......
});
}, [countryId]);
The code after fix:
useEffect(() => {
getDistrict({
geonameid: countryId,
subdistrict: level,
}).then((res) => {
......
});
}, [countryId,level]);
Can see that , problems solved after I provided all the params(including the level param) that supposed to pass through.

I had a similar problem and solved it :
I was automatically making the user logged-in by dispatching an action on redux
( placing authentication token on redux state )
and then I was trying to show a message with this.setState({succ_message: "...")
in my component.
Component was looking empty with the same error on console : "unmounted component".."memory leak" etc.
After I read Walter's answer up in this thread
I've noticed that in the Routing table of my application ,
my component's route wasn't valid if user is logged-in :
{!this.props.user.token &&
<div>
<Route path="/register/:type" exact component={MyComp} />
</div>
}
I made the Route visible whether the token exists or not.

In my case the issue was that the parent component was hidding the child because of a condition change in the child component.
So what I did was to change the condition so the child component was always shown.
What was happening:
const ParentComponent:FC = () => {
...
if (someCondition) {
return null;
}
return (
<>
Some cool text here
<ChildModalComponent message="this is a cool modal" />
</>
)
}
const ChildModalComponent: FC = () => {
...
const handleSubmit = () => {
setSomeCondition(true);
}
}
So after clicking submit the modal was automatically hidden becasue of the parent condition (someCondition).
How did I fix it?
I changed the place where the someCondition was checked in the Parent component, so the child component was always shown:
const ParentComponent:FC = () => {
...
return (
<>
{!someCondition && <>Some cool text here</>
<ChildModalComponent message="this is a cool modal" />
</>
)
}

I faced same warning, not it is fixed. To fix the issue, I removed the useRef() variable check in useEffect()
Earlier, the code was
const varRef = useRef();
useEffect(() => {
if (!varRef.current)
{
}
}, []);
Now, the code is
const varRef = useRef();
useEffect(() => {
//if (!varRef.current)
{
}
}, [])
Hope, it helps...

Inspired by the accepted answer by #ford04 I had even better approach dealing with it, instead of using useEffect inside useAsync create a new function that returns a callback for componentWillUnmount :
function asyncRequest(asyncRequest, onSuccess, onError, onComplete) {
let isMounted=true
asyncRequest().then((data => isMounted ? onSuccess(data):null)).catch(onError).finally(onComplete)
return () => {isMounted=false}
}
...
useEffect(()=>{
return asyncRequest(()=>someAsyncTask(arg), response=> {
setSomeState(response)
},onError, onComplete)
},[])

const handleClick = async (item: NavheadersType, index: number) => {
const newNavHeaders = [...navheaders];
if (item.url) {
await router.push(item.url); =>>>> line causing error (causing route to happen)
// router.push(item.url); =>>> coreect line
newNavHeaders.forEach((item) => (item.active = false));
newNavHeaders[index].active = true;
setnavheaders([...newNavHeaders]);
}
};

The simplest and most compact solution (with an explanation) is seen below as a one-liner solution.
useEffect(() => { return () => {}; }, []);
The useEffect() example above returns a callback function triggers React to finish its unmount portion of its life-cycle prior to updating state.
That very simplistic solution is all that is needed. In addition, it also works unlike the fictional syntax provided by #ford04 and #sfletche . By the way, the below code snippet from #ford04 is purely imaginary syntax (#sfletche , #vinod , #guneetgstar , and #Drew Cordano used the very same imaginary syntax).
data => {       <--- Fictional/Imaginary Syntax
someAsyncOperation().then(data => {
if (isMounted) setState(data); // add conditional check
})
All of my linters and all the linters of my entire team will not accept it and they report Uncaught SyntaxError: unexpected token: '=>'. I am surprised that no one caught the imaginary syntax. Would anyone who has participated in this question-thread, particularly among the up-voters, explain to me how they got the solutions to work for them?

Inspired by #ford04 answer I use this hook, which also takes callbacks for success, errors, finally and an abortFn:
export const useAsync = (
asyncFn,
onSuccess = false,
onError = false,
onFinally = false,
abortFn = false
) => {
useEffect(() => {
let isMounted = true;
const run = async () => {
try{
let data = await asyncFn()
if (isMounted && onSuccess) onSuccess(data)
} catch(error) {
if (isMounted && onError) onSuccess(error)
} finally {
if (isMounted && onFinally) onFinally()
}
}
run()
return () => {
if(abortFn) abortFn()
isMounted = false
};
}, [asyncFn, onSuccess])
}
If the asyncFn is doing some kind of fetch from back-end it often makes sense to abort it when the component is unmounted (not always though, sometimes if ie. you're loading some data into a store you might as well just want to finish it even if component is unmounted)

Async redux action to fetch data is causing component to reload and cause react to react max depth in reload

I am trying to create a component that allows detecting changes in the redux store. Once the shouldUpdateData flag is set in the store, the component responsible for updating should fetch the data by using an async action creator. In my case, either the error "Maximum updates have reached" occurs or the update never happens.
Depending on the dispatch function stopFetching() (turns off the shouldUpdateData flag), the error or outcome changes. If I do the dispatch inside the action creator there are endless updates. If the code is used as it is below, no update occurs.
The reason I used the useSelector() hook from 'react-redux' is to detect a change in the store for the loading attribute.
Thank you in advance.
Here is the action creator:
export function updateDataAsync(id) {
return function (dispatch) {
// dispatch(fetchDataRequest());
return fetch(`/api/user/${id}/data`, {
method: "GET",
headers: {
'Accept': 'application/json',
'Content-Type': 'application/json'
}
})
.then(res => res.json())
.then(
(result) => {
let {projects, notes} = result;
// New data and dispatch function
dispatch(fetchDataSuccess({projects, notes}));
},
(error) => { dispatch(fetchDataFailure(error)) }
)
}
}
Here is the reducer for this action creator:
export function savedData(state = DATA_INITIAL_STATE, action) {
switch(action.type) {
case FETCH_STATES.FETCH_DATA_REQUEST:
return {
...state,
loading: true
}
case FETCH_STATES.FETCH_DATA_SUCCESS:
return {
loading: false,
data: action.data,
error: ''
}
case FETCH_STATES.FETCH_DATA_FAILURE:
return {
loading: false,
data: {},
error: action.error.message
}
default:
return state;
}
}
The React component that is doing the update:
function StoreUpdater({ update, userId, shouldUpdate, startFetch, stopFetch, children }) {
const loading = useSelector(state => state.savedData.loading);
let reqSent = useRef(false);
useEffect(()=>{
if(!reqSent && shouldUpdate) {
startFetch();
update(userId)
reqSent.context = true;
}
})
return loading ? <LoadingAnimation /> : children;
}
const mapStateToProps = (state) => {
return {
userId: state.user.id,
shouldUpdate: state.shouldUpdateData // The flag that should trigger the update
}
}
const mapDispatchToProps = (dispatch) => {
return {
stopFetch: () => { dispatch(setShouldFetchData(false)) },
update: (id) => { dispatch(updateDataAsync(id)) },
startFetch: () => dispatch(fetchDataRequest()),
}
}
export default connect(mapStateToProps, mapDispatchToProps)(StoreUpdater);

You dint pass any dependency to useEffect so it will be called on every render which is causing infinite renders
change useEffect to
useEffect(()=>{
if(!reqSent && shouldUpdate) {
startFetch();
update(userId)
reqSent.context = true;
}
},[])
For complete information regarding useEffect refer this link

The reference I created inside the component responsible of the updates, was causing the problem. The reference was preventing the update dispatch to occur due to the if statement being false.

mapStateToProps and mapDispatchToProps were react-redux higher order functions to connect classes components into the store. there equalants at functional components are useSelector and useDispatch. re-write your HOC redux adaption into hooks, and add [ dependency ] at useEffect usage
function StoreUpdater({ update, userId, shouldUpdate, startFetch, stopFetch, children }) {
const loading = useSelector(state => state.savedData.loading);
const userId = useSelector(state => state.user.id);
const shouldUpdate = useSelector(state => state.shouldUpdateData);
let reqSent = useRef(false);
const dispatch = useDispatch() // import from 'react-redux'
useEffect(()=>{
if(!reqSent && shouldUpdate) {
dispatch(startFetch());
dispatch(update(userId));
reqSent.context = true;
}
}, [reqSent, shouldUpdate, startFetch, dispatch, update, userId])
return loading ? <LoadingAnimation /> : children;
}
export default StoreUpdater ;

React Hooks - Making an Ajax request

I have just began playing around with React hooks and am wondering how an AJAX request should look?
I have tried many attempts, but am unable to get it to work, and also don't really know the best way to implement it. Below is my latest attempt:
import React, { useState, useEffect } from 'react';
const App = () => {
const URL = 'http://api.com';
const [data, setData] = useState({});
useEffect(() => {
const resp = fetch(URL).then(res => {
console.log(res)
});
});
return (
<div>
// display content here
</div>
)
}

You could create a custom hook called useFetch that will implement the useEffect hook.
If you pass an empty array as the second argument to the useEffect hook will trigger the request on componentDidMount. By passing the url in the array this will trigger this code anytime the url updates.
Here is a demo in code sandbox.
See code below.
import React, { useState, useEffect } from 'react';
const useFetch = (url) => {
const [data, setData] = useState(null);
useEffect(() => {
async function fetchData() {
const response = await fetch(url);
const json = await response.json();
setData(json);
}
fetchData();
}, [url]);
return data;
};
const App = () => {
const URL = 'http://www.example.json';
const result = useFetch(URL);
return (
<div>
{JSON.stringify(result)}
</div>
);
}

Works just fine... Here you go:
import React, { useState, useEffect } from 'react';
const useFetch = url => {
const [data, setData] = useState(null);
const [loading, setLoading] = useState(true);
const fetchUser = async () => {
const response = await fetch(url);
const data = await response.json();
const [user] = data.results;
setData(user);
setLoading(false);
};
useEffect(() => {
fetchUser();
}, []);
return { data, loading };
};
const App = () => {
const { data, loading } = useFetch('https://api.randomuser.me/');
return (
<div className="App">
{loading ? (
<div>Loading...</div>
) : (
<React.Fragment>
<div className="name">
{data.name.first} {data.name.last}
</div>
<img className="cropper" src={data.picture.large} alt="avatar" />
</React.Fragment>
)}
</div>
);
};
Live Demo:
Edit
Updated based on version change (thanks #mgol for bringing it to
my attention in the comments).

Great answers so far, but I'll add a custom hook for when you want to trigger a request, because you can do that too.
function useTriggerableEndpoint(fn) {
const [res, setRes] = useState({ data: null, error: null, loading: null });
const [req, setReq] = useState();
useEffect(
async () => {
if (!req) return;
try {
setRes({ data: null, error: null, loading: true });
const { data } = await axios(req);
setRes({ data, error: null, loading: false });
} catch (error) {
setRes({ data: null, error, loading: false });
}
},
[req]
);
return [res, (...args) => setReq(fn(...args))];
}
You can create a function using this hook for a specific API method like so if you wish, but be aware that this abstraction isn't strictly required and can be quite dangerous (a loose function with a hook is not a good idea in case it is used outside of the context of a React component function).
const todosApi = "https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/todos";
function postTodoEndpoint() {
return useTriggerableEndpoint(data => ({
url: todosApi,
method: "POST",
data
}));
}
Finally, from within your function component
const [newTodo, postNewTodo] = postTodoEndpoint();
function createTodo(title, body, userId) {
postNewTodo({
title,
body,
userId
});
}
And then just point createTodo to an onSubmit or onClick handler. newTodo will have your data, loading and error statuses. Sandbox code right here.

use-http is a little react useFetch hook used like: https://use-http.com
import useFetch from 'use-http'
function Todos() {
const [todos, setTodos] = useState([])
const { request, response } = useFetch('https://example.com')
// componentDidMount
useEffect(() => { initializeTodos() }, [])
async function initializeTodos() {
const initialTodos = await request.get('/todos')
if (response.ok) setTodos(initialTodos)
}
async function addTodo() {
const newTodo = await request.post('/todos', {
title: 'no way',
})
if (response.ok) setTodos([...todos, newTodo])
}
return (
<>
<button onClick={addTodo}>Add Todo</button>
{request.error && 'Error!'}
{request.loading && 'Loading...'}
{todos.map(todo => (
<div key={todo.id}>{todo.title}</div>
)}
</>
)
}
or, if you don't want to manage the state yourself, you can do
function Todos() {
// the dependency array at the end means `onMount` (GET by default)
const { loading, error, data } = useFetch('/todos', [])
return (
<>
{error && 'Error!'}
{loading && 'Loading...'}
{data && data.map(todo => (
<div key={todo.id}>{todo.title}</div>
)}
</>
)
}
Live Demo

I'd recommend you to use react-request-hook as it covers a lot of use cases (multiple request at same time, cancelable requests on unmounting and managed request states). It is written in typescript, so you can take advantage of this if your project uses typescript as well, and if it doesn't, depending on your IDE you might see the type hints, and the library also provides some helpers to allow you to safely type the payload that you expect as result from a request.
It's well tested (100% code coverage) and you might use it simple as that:
function UserProfile(props) {
const [user, getUser] = useResource((id) => {
url: `/user/${id}`,
method: 'GET'
})
useEffect(() => getUser(props.userId), []);
if (user.isLoading) return <Spinner />;
return (
<User
name={user.data.name}
age={user.data.age}
email={user.data.email}
>
)
}
image example
Author disclaimer: We've been using this implementation in production. There's a bunch of hooks to deal with promises but there are also edge cases not being covered or not enough test implemented. react-request-hook is battle tested even before its official release. Its main goal is to be well tested and safe to use as we're dealing with one of the most critical aspects of our apps.

Traditionally, you would write the Ajax call in the componentDidMount lifecycle of class components and use setState to display the returned data when the request has returned.
With hooks, you would use useEffect and passing in an empty array as the second argument to make the callback run once on mount of the component.
Here's an example which fetches a random user profile from an API and renders the name.
function AjaxExample() {
const [user, setUser] = React.useState(null);
React.useEffect(() => {
fetch('https://randomuser.me/api/')
.then(results => results.json())
.then(data => {
setUser(data.results[0]);
});
}, []); // Pass empty array to only run once on mount.
return <div>
{user ? user.name.first : 'Loading...'}
</div>;
}
ReactDOM.render(<AjaxExample/>, document.getElementById('app'));
<script src="https://unpkg.com/react#16.7.0-alpha.0/umd/react.development.js"></script>
<script src="https://unpkg.com/react-dom#16.7.0-alpha.0/umd/react-dom.development.js"></script>
<div id="app"></div>

I find many wrong usages of useEffect in the answers above.
An async function shouldn't be passed into useEffect.
Let's see the signature of useEffect:
useEffect(didUpdate, inputs);
You can do side effects in didUpdate function, and return a dispose function. The dispose function is very important, you can use that function to cancel a request, clear a timer etc.
Any async function will return a promise, but not a function, so the dispose function actually takes no effects.
So pass in an async function absolutely can handle your side effects, but is an anti-pattern of Hooks API.

Here's something which I think will work:
import React, { useState, useEffect } from 'react';
const App = () => {
const URL = 'http://api.com';
const [data, setData] = useState({})
useEffect(function () {
const getData = async () => {
const resp = await fetch(URL);
const data = await resp.json();
setData(data);
}
getData();
}, []);
return (
<div>
{ data.something ? data.something : 'still loading' }
</div>
)
}
There are couple of important bits:
The function that you pass to useEffect acts as a componentDidMount which means that it may be executed many times. That's why we are adding an empty array as a second argument, which means "This effect has no dependencies, so run it only once".
Your App component still renders something even tho the data is not here yet. So you have to handle the case where the data is not loaded but the component is rendered. There's no change in that by the way. We are doing that even now.

Develop Reference

JavaScript is the programming language of the Web.

react hooks first dispatch causes other muplitple dispatch to fire twice - javascript

Related

context api - useEffect doesn't fire on first render - react native

reactjs passing value to useEffect from useSelector

Not able to figure out this error: Can't perform a React state update on an unmounted component [duplicate]

Async redux action to fetch data is causing component to reload and cause react to react max depth in reload

React Hooks - Making an Ajax request

Categories

Resources