Enzyme mount() rerender after state change in useEffect()? - javascript

I'm new to React and to React unit testing. I have a component which loads some divs based on state set with useState. Inside useEffect, if a rejected promise is returned from a function then an error div should be shown instead. I want to test this scenario, but because initial state is set as error = false, the original divs are still shown instead.
My question is, how can I do this so that the test registers updated divs? I'm using Enzyme's mount(), but I've also tried it with shallow(). I've also verified that it's actually going into .catch() with some console.logs.
component:
export const Main = (props) => {
const [showLoadError, setShowLoadError] = useState(false);
const [loadError, setLoadError] = useState('');
React.useEffect(() => {
const { categories, actions } = props;
// retrieve categories from Db if they don't exist in state
if (categories.length === 0) {
actions.loadCategories().catch(err => {
setShowLoadError(true);
setLoadError(err.message);
})
} else {
setShowLoadError(false);
setLoadError('');
}
}, []);
return (
<>
{/* conditional show for error container if loading failed */}
{showLoadError &&
<div className="load-error">
Error loading categories. {loadError}
</div>
}
{/* conditional show for no Load error */}
{!showLoadError &&
<div className="grid-container grid-container--fit">
<div><CategoryContainer /></div>
<div><ItemContainer /></div>
<div><FileAssociationsContainer /></div>
</div>
}
</>
);
}
test:
import React from 'react';
import ConnectedApp, { Main } from './Main';
import { shallow, mount } from 'enzyme';
jest.mock("../category/CategoryContainer");
jest.mock("../item/ItemContainer");
jest.mock("../fileAssociations/FileAssociationsContainer");
describe("Main component", () => {
beforeEach(() => {
fetch.resetMocks()
});
test('should render error div after loadCategories fail', () => {
const categories = [];
const errMessage = {message: 'test error'}
const actions = {
loadCategories: jest.fn(() => {
return Promise.reject(errMessage);
})
};
const wrapper = mount(<Main categories={categories} actions={actions} />);
wrapper.setProps(); // rerenders
// expect there to be a load-error div
expect(wrapper.find('div').hasClass('load-error')).toBe(true)
// expect loadCategories to be called because component was passed in empty categories
expect(actions.loadCategories).toBeCalled();
});
});
I've tried wrapper.setProps(), wrapper.update() before my expects with no luck.
Additionally, this unit test gives a jest warning that An update to Main inside a test was not wrapped in act(...). This only happens if actions.loadCategories() returns a rejected promise. It does not do this when it returns a resolved promise. I've tried moving code into act() with no luck in removing the error, like such:
act(() => {
actions = {
loadCategories: jest.fn(() => {
return Promise.reject(errMessage);
})
};
wrapper = mount(<Main categories={categories} actions={actions} />);
wrapper.setProps(); // rerenders
});

Related

React: How to avoid duplication in a state array

I am making MERN social media app.
I want to show all the friends of the current user in a list in SideBar.jsx .
Home.jsx (parent of Sidebar.jsx)
import React, { Component } from "react";
import { Person } from "#material-ui/icons";
import Topbar from "../../components/topbar/Topbar";
import Sidebar from "../../components/sidebar/Sidebar";
import Feed from "../../components/feed/Feed";
import Rightbar from "../../components/rightbar/Rightbar";
import "./home.css";
export default function Home() {
return (
<>
<Topbar />
<div className="homeContainer">
<Sidebar />
<Feed />
<Rightbar />
</div>
</>
);
}
SideBar.jsx
import "./sidebar.css";
import React, { Component, useContext, useState } from "react";
...
import { axiosInstance } from "../../config";
export default function Sidebar() {
const { user } = useContext(AuthContext);
const [followings, setFollowings] = useState([]);
const followingsList = user.followings;
useEffect(() => {
const fetchFollowings = async () => {
followingsList.map(async (id) => {
try {
const theUser = await axiosInstance.get(`/users?userId=${id}`);
if (followings.includes(theUser.data)) {
} else {
setFollowings((prev) => [...prev, theUser.data]);
}
} catch (error) {
console.log(error);
}
});
};
fetchFollowings();
}, [user]);
return (
<div className="sidebar">
.....
<ul className="sidebarFriendList">
{followings.map((u) => (
<CloseFriend key={u._id} user={u} />
))}
</ul>
</div>
</div>
);
}
For example, in this case, in the state "followings", there are 2 user objects.
So, the line
followings.map((u) => (...
should only show 2 entries.
However, the result is below.
As you can see, it is showing each friend twice.
I tired to check if a user object already exists in followings by doing
if (followings.includes(theUser.data)) {
} else {
setFollowings((prev) => [...prev, theUser.data]);
}
But this is not working.
How can I make sure that it only shows each user once?
I want it to be like this
Any help would be greatly appreciated. thank you
This is happening because it seems that your useEffect method is being fired two times (probably because you are using React.StrictMode) and you are setting the state inside the .map method (that is not good because you trigger a new render each time you call the setState).
What I would recommend you to do, is to remove the setState from the .map method and just set the new state after you format your data. So it would be something like this:
const newFollowings = followingsList.map(async (id) => {
try {
const theUser = await axiosInstance.get(`/users?userId=${id}`);
return theUser.data;
} catch (error) {
console.log(error);
}
});
setFollowings(newFollowings);
Probably you would have to add a filtering to the array in case there are some errors (because on errors the mapped value would be undefined):
.filter(data => data);
When you are using the .map function with async/await Promise.all usually always does the trick. Instead of pushing the state on every iteration you collect the followers list and set the state when all your fetching is done. I did not test it yet, but I hope it works.
const followingsList = user.followings;
useEffect(() => {
const fetchFollowings = async () => {
const list = await Promise.all(followingsList.map(async (id) => (
await axios.get('/user?userId=' + id);
)));
setFollowers(list);
};
fetchFollowings();
}, [user]);
Note: let me know if it works, if not I'll do a little sandbox on my own

waitFor unable to find HTML element after setTimeout and advanceTimersByTime

I have a component that utilises quite a few setTimeouts in order to do three things: a) mount a child to the DOM, b) animate that child in, c) unmount that child after user interaction.
I'm trying to mock this behaviour in a test, and am specifically testing step b - I'm doing a queryByText to grab the text value of the child that I animate in.
However, the text never seems to show up in the HTML that gets printed to the CLI when the test fails. The error is as follows:
expect(received).toBeInTheDocument()
received value must be an HTMLElement or an SVGElement.
Received has value: null
My test looks like this:
it("should show message after setTimeout", async () => {
jest.useFakeTimers();
jest.advanceTimersByTime(5000);
const amendedMockContext = {
...baseMockContext,
introductionData: {
data: {
cta: "This is a cta!",
},
},
};
customRender(<FAB />, { contextProps: amendedMockContext });
const message = screen.queryByText(/this/i);
await waitFor(() => expect(message).toBeInTheDocument());
});
and my component animates in and out like so. Note the $visible flag triggers the animation:
const CTA_REVEAL_TIME = 5000;
export default function FAB() {
const [showCTA, setShowCTA] = useState(false);
const [mountCTA, setMountCTA] = useState(false);
// mount just before animating (step a)
useEffect(() => {
const mountCTATimer = setTimeout(
() => setMountCTA(true),
CTA_REVEAL_TIME - 1000
);
return () => {
clearTimeout(mountCTATimer);
};
}, []);
// animate in message (step b)
useEffect(() => {
const CTATimer = setTimeout(
() => setShowCTA((prevState) => !prevState),
CTA_REVEAL_TIME
);
return () => {
clearTimeout(CTATimer);
};
}, []);
return (
<>
{mountCta && <p $visible={showCTA}>{message}</p>}
</>
);
}
In my test, I've tried using various methods of async/await, waitFor, all the different query/get/find methods, but can't seem to get it to actually await the message revealing, even though I'm artificially advaning time by 5000ms. I also use advanceTimersBytime in other tests and have no such problems.
You should mount the component first, then advance the timers.
import { act, render, screen, waitFor } from '#testing-library/react';
import '#testing-library/jest-dom';
import React from 'react';
import FAB from './FAB';
describe('71867883', () => {
it('should show message after setTimeout', async () => {
jest.useFakeTimers();
render(<FAB />);
act(() => {
jest.advanceTimersByTime(5000);
})
await waitFor(() => expect(screen.queryByText(/this/i)).toBeInTheDocument());
});
});

Not able to figure out this error: Can't perform a React state update on an unmounted component [duplicate]

Problem
I am writing an application in React and was unable to avoid a super common pitfall, which is calling setState(...) after componentWillUnmount(...).
I looked very carefully at my code and tried to put some guarding clauses in place, but the problem persisted and I am still observing the warning.
Therefore, I've got two questions:
How do I figure out from the stack trace, which particular component and event handler or lifecycle hook is responsible for the rule violation?
Well, how to fix the problem itself, because my code was written with this pitfall in mind and is already trying to prevent it, but some underlying component's still generating the warning.
Browser console
Warning: Can't perform a React state update on an unmounted component.
This is a no-op, but it indicates a memory leak in your application.
To fix, cancel all subscriptions and asynchronous tasks in the componentWillUnmount
method.
in TextLayerInternal (created by Context.Consumer)
in TextLayer (created by PageInternal) index.js:1446
d/console[e]
index.js:1446
warningWithoutStack
react-dom.development.js:520
warnAboutUpdateOnUnmounted
react-dom.development.js:18238
scheduleWork
react-dom.development.js:19684
enqueueSetState
react-dom.development.js:12936
./node_modules/react/cjs/react.development.js/Component.prototype.setState
react.development.js:356
_callee$
TextLayer.js:97
tryCatch
runtime.js:63
invoke
runtime.js:282
defineIteratorMethods/</prototype[method]
runtime.js:116
asyncGeneratorStep
asyncToGenerator.js:3
_throw
asyncToGenerator.js:29
Code
Book.tsx
import { throttle } from 'lodash';
import * as React from 'react';
import { AutoWidthPdf } from '../shared/AutoWidthPdf';
import BookCommandPanel from '../shared/BookCommandPanel';
import BookTextPath from '../static/pdf/sde.pdf';
import './Book.css';
const DEFAULT_WIDTH = 140;
class Book extends React.Component {
setDivSizeThrottleable: () => void;
pdfWrapper: HTMLDivElement | null = null;
isComponentMounted: boolean = false;
state = {
hidden: true,
pdfWidth: DEFAULT_WIDTH,
};
constructor(props: any) {
super(props);
this.setDivSizeThrottleable = throttle(
() => {
if (this.isComponentMounted) {
this.setState({
pdfWidth: this.pdfWrapper!.getBoundingClientRect().width - 5,
});
}
},
500,
);
}
componentDidMount = () => {
this.isComponentMounted = true;
this.setDivSizeThrottleable();
window.addEventListener("resize", this.setDivSizeThrottleable);
};
componentWillUnmount = () => {
this.isComponentMounted = false;
window.removeEventListener("resize", this.setDivSizeThrottleable);
};
render = () => (
<div className="Book">
{ this.state.hidden && <div className="Book__LoadNotification centered">Book is being loaded...</div> }
<div className={this.getPdfContentContainerClassName()}>
<BookCommandPanel
bookTextPath={BookTextPath}
/>
<div className="Book__PdfContent" ref={ref => this.pdfWrapper = ref}>
<AutoWidthPdf
file={BookTextPath}
width={this.state.pdfWidth}
onLoadSuccess={(_: any) => this.onDocumentComplete()}
/>
</div>
<BookCommandPanel
bookTextPath={BookTextPath}
/>
</div>
</div>
);
getPdfContentContainerClassName = () => this.state.hidden ? 'hidden' : '';
onDocumentComplete = () => {
try {
this.setState({ hidden: false });
this.setDivSizeThrottleable();
} catch (caughtError) {
console.warn({ caughtError });
}
};
}
export default Book;
AutoWidthPdf.tsx
import * as React from 'react';
import { Document, Page, pdfjs } from 'react-pdf';
pdfjs.GlobalWorkerOptions.workerSrc = `//cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/pdf.js/${pdfjs.version}/pdf.worker.js`;
interface IProps {
file: string;
width: number;
onLoadSuccess: (pdf: any) => void;
}
export class AutoWidthPdf extends React.Component<IProps> {
render = () => (
<Document
file={this.props.file}
onLoadSuccess={(_: any) => this.props.onLoadSuccess(_)}
>
<Page
pageNumber={1}
width={this.props.width}
/>
</Document>
);
}
Update 1: Cancel throttleable function (still no luck)
const DEFAULT_WIDTH = 140;
class Book extends React.Component {
setDivSizeThrottleable: ((() => void) & Cancelable) | undefined;
pdfWrapper: HTMLDivElement | null = null;
state = {
hidden: true,
pdfWidth: DEFAULT_WIDTH,
};
componentDidMount = () => {
this.setDivSizeThrottleable = throttle(
() => {
this.setState({
pdfWidth: this.pdfWrapper!.getBoundingClientRect().width - 5,
});
},
500,
);
this.setDivSizeThrottleable();
window.addEventListener("resize", this.setDivSizeThrottleable);
};
componentWillUnmount = () => {
window.removeEventListener("resize", this.setDivSizeThrottleable!);
this.setDivSizeThrottleable!.cancel();
this.setDivSizeThrottleable = undefined;
};
render = () => (
<div className="Book">
{ this.state.hidden && <div className="Book__LoadNotification centered">Book is being loaded...</div> }
<div className={this.getPdfContentContainerClassName()}>
<BookCommandPanel
BookTextPath={BookTextPath}
/>
<div className="Book__PdfContent" ref={ref => this.pdfWrapper = ref}>
<AutoWidthPdf
file={BookTextPath}
width={this.state.pdfWidth}
onLoadSuccess={(_: any) => this.onDocumentComplete()}
/>
</div>
<BookCommandPanel
BookTextPath={BookTextPath}
/>
</div>
</div>
);
getPdfContentContainerClassName = () => this.state.hidden ? 'hidden' : '';
onDocumentComplete = () => {
try {
this.setState({ hidden: false });
this.setDivSizeThrottleable!();
} catch (caughtError) {
console.warn({ caughtError });
}
};
}
export default Book;
Here is a React Hooks specific solution for
Error
Warning: Can't perform a React state update on an unmounted component.
Solution
You can declare let isMounted = true inside useEffect, which will be changed in the cleanup callback, as soon as the component is unmounted. Before state updates, you now check this variable conditionally:
useEffect(() => {
let isMounted = true; // note mutable flag
someAsyncOperation().then(data => {
if (isMounted) setState(data); // add conditional check
})
return () => { isMounted = false }; // cleanup toggles value, if unmounted
}, []); // adjust dependencies to your needs
const Parent = () => {
const [mounted, setMounted] = useState(true);
return (
<div>
Parent:
<button onClick={() => setMounted(!mounted)}>
{mounted ? "Unmount" : "Mount"} Child
</button>
{mounted && <Child />}
<p>
Unmount Child, while it is still loading. It won't set state later on,
so no error is triggered.
</p>
</div>
);
};
const Child = () => {
const [state, setState] = useState("loading (4 sec)...");
useEffect(() => {
let isMounted = true;
fetchData();
return () => {
isMounted = false;
};
// simulate some Web API fetching
function fetchData() {
setTimeout(() => {
// drop "if (isMounted)" to trigger error again
// (take IDE, doesn't work with stack snippet)
if (isMounted) setState("data fetched")
else console.log("aborted setState on unmounted component")
}, 4000);
}
}, []);
return <div>Child: {state}</div>;
};
ReactDOM.render(<Parent />, document.getElementById("root"));
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/react/16.13.0/umd/react.production.min.js" integrity="sha256-32Gmw5rBDXyMjg/73FgpukoTZdMrxuYW7tj8adbN8z4=" crossorigin="anonymous"></script>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/react-dom/16.13.0/umd/react-dom.production.min.js" integrity="sha256-bjQ42ac3EN0GqK40pC9gGi/YixvKyZ24qMP/9HiGW7w=" crossorigin="anonymous"></script>
<div id="root"></div>
<script>var { useReducer, useEffect, useState, useRef } = React</script>
Extension: Custom useAsync Hook
We can encapsulate all the boilerplate into a custom Hook, that automatically aborts async functions in case the component unmounts or dependency values have changed before:
function useAsync(asyncFn, onSuccess) {
useEffect(() => {
let isActive = true;
asyncFn().then(data => {
if (isActive) onSuccess(data);
});
return () => { isActive = false };
}, [asyncFn, onSuccess]);
}
// custom Hook for automatic abortion on unmount or dependency change
// You might add onFailure for promise errors as well.
function useAsync(asyncFn, onSuccess) {
useEffect(() => {
let isActive = true;
asyncFn().then(data => {
if (isActive) onSuccess(data)
else console.log("aborted setState on unmounted component")
});
return () => {
isActive = false;
};
}, [asyncFn, onSuccess]);
}
const Child = () => {
const [state, setState] = useState("loading (4 sec)...");
useAsync(simulateFetchData, setState);
return <div>Child: {state}</div>;
};
const Parent = () => {
const [mounted, setMounted] = useState(true);
return (
<div>
Parent:
<button onClick={() => setMounted(!mounted)}>
{mounted ? "Unmount" : "Mount"} Child
</button>
{mounted && <Child />}
<p>
Unmount Child, while it is still loading. It won't set state later on,
so no error is triggered.
</p>
</div>
);
};
const simulateFetchData = () => new Promise(
resolve => setTimeout(() => resolve("data fetched"), 4000));
ReactDOM.render(<Parent />, document.getElementById("root"));
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/react/16.13.0/umd/react.production.min.js" integrity="sha256-32Gmw5rBDXyMjg/73FgpukoTZdMrxuYW7tj8adbN8z4=" crossorigin="anonymous"></script>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/react-dom/16.13.0/umd/react-dom.production.min.js" integrity="sha256-bjQ42ac3EN0GqK40pC9gGi/YixvKyZ24qMP/9HiGW7w=" crossorigin="anonymous"></script>
<div id="root"></div>
<script>var { useReducer, useEffect, useState, useRef } = React</script>
More on effect cleanups: Overreacted: A Complete Guide to useEffect
To remove - Can't perform a React state update on an unmounted component warning, use componentDidMount method under a condition and make false that condition on componentWillUnmount method. For example : -
class Home extends Component {
_isMounted = false;
constructor(props) {
super(props);
this.state = {
news: [],
};
}
componentDidMount() {
this._isMounted = true;
ajaxVar
.get('https://domain')
.then(result => {
if (this._isMounted) {
this.setState({
news: result.data.hits,
});
}
});
}
componentWillUnmount() {
this._isMounted = false;
}
render() {
...
}
}
If above solutions dont work, try this and it works for me:
componentWillUnmount() {
// fix Warning: Can't perform a React state update on an unmounted component
this.setState = (state,callback)=>{
return;
};
}
There is a hook that's fairly common called useIsMounted that solves this problem (for functional components)...
import { useRef, useEffect } from 'react';
export function useIsMounted() {
const isMounted = useRef(false);
useEffect(() => {
isMounted.current = true;
return () => isMounted.current = false;
}, []);
return isMounted;
}
then in your functional component
function Book() {
const isMounted = useIsMounted();
...
useEffect(() => {
asyncOperation().then(data => {
if (isMounted.current) { setState(data); }
})
});
...
}
Checking if a component is mounted is actually an anti pattern as per React documentation. The solution to the setState warning is rather to leverage on the use of an AbortController:
useEffect(() => {
const abortController = new AbortController() // creating an AbortController
fetch(url, { signal: abortController.signal }) // passing the signal to the query
.then(data => {
setState(data) // if everything went well, set the state
})
.catch(error => {
if (error.name === 'AbortError') return // if the query has been aborted, do nothing
throw error
})
return () => {
abortController.abort() // stop the query by aborting on the AbortController on unmount
}
}, [])
For asynchronous operations that aren't based on the Fetch API, there still should be a way to cancel these asynchronous operations, and you should rather leverage these than just checking if a component is mounted. If you are building your own API, you can implement the AbortController API in it to handle it.
For more context, the check if a component is mounted is an anti pattern as React is checking internally if the component is mounted to display that warning. Doing the same check again is just a way to hide the warning, and there are some easier ways to hide them than adding this piece of code on a big part of a codebase.
Source: https://medium.com/doctolib/react-stop-checking-if-your-component-is-mounted-3bb2568a4934
I had this warning possibly because of calling setState from an effect hook (This is discussed in these 3 issues linked together).
Anyway, upgrading the react version removed the warning.
React already removed this warning
but here is a better solution (not just workaround)
useEffect(() => {
const abortController = new AbortController() // creating an AbortController
fetch(url, { signal: abortController.signal }) // passing the signal to the query
.then(data => {
setState(data) // if everything went well, set the state
})
.catch(error => {
if (error.name === 'AbortError') return // if the query has been aborted, do nothing
throw error
})
return () => {
abortController.abort()
}
}, [])
The solution from #ford04 didn't worked to me and specially if you need to use the isMounted in multiple places (multiple useEffect for instance), it's recommended to useRef, as bellow:
Essential packages
"dependencies":
{
"react": "17.0.1",
}
"devDependencies": {
"typescript": "4.1.5",
}
My Hook Component
export const SubscriptionsView: React.FC = () => {
const [data, setData] = useState<Subscription[]>();
const isMounted = React.useRef(true);
React.useEffect(() => {
if (isMounted.current) {
// fetch data
// setData (fetch result)
return () => {
isMounted.current = false;
};
}
}
});
try changing setDivSizeThrottleable to
this.setDivSizeThrottleable = throttle(
() => {
if (this.isComponentMounted) {
this.setState({
pdfWidth: this.pdfWrapper!.getBoundingClientRect().width - 5,
});
}
},
500,
{ leading: false, trailing: true }
);
I know that you're not using history, but in my case I was using the useHistory hook from React Router DOM, which unmounts the component before the state is persisted in my React Context Provider.
To fix this problem I have used the hook withRouter nesting the component, in my case export default withRouter(Login), and inside the component const Login = props => { ...; props.history.push("/dashboard"); .... I have also removed the other props.history.push from the component, e.g, if(authorization.token) return props.history.push('/dashboard') because this causes a loop, because the authorization state.
An alternative to push a new item to history.
Add a ref to a jsx component and then check it exist
function Book() {
const ref = useRef();
useEffect(() => {
asyncOperation().then(data => {
if (ref.current) setState(data);
})
});
return <div ref={ref}>content</div>
}
I had a similar issue thanks #ford04 helped me out.
However, another error occurred.
NB. I am using ReactJS hooks
ndex.js:1 Warning: Cannot update during an existing state transition (such as within `render`). Render methods should be a pure function of props and state.
What causes the error?
import {useHistory} from 'react-router-dom'
const History = useHistory()
if (true) {
history.push('/new-route');
}
return (
<>
<render component />
</>
)
This could not work because despite you are redirecting to new page all state and props are being manipulated on the dom or simply rendering to the previous page did not stop.
What solution I found
import {Redirect} from 'react-router-dom'
if (true) {
return <redirect to="/new-route" />
}
return (
<>
<render component />
</>
)
If you are fetching data from axios and the error still occurs, just wrap the setter inside the condition
let isRendered = useRef(false);
useEffect(() => {
isRendered = true;
axios
.get("/sample/api")
.then(res => {
if (isRendered) {
setState(res.data);
}
return null;
})
.catch(err => console.log(err));
return () => {
isRendered = false;
};
}, []);
I have 2 solutions for this error:
return:
If you are used hook and useEffect, So put a return end of useEffect.
useEffect(() => {
window.addEventListener('mousemove', logMouseMove)
return () => {
window.removeEventListener('mousemove', logMouseMove)
}
}, [])
componentWillUnmount:
If you are used componentDidMount, So put componentWillUnmount next to it.
componentDidMount() {
window.addEventListener('mousemove', this.logMouseMove)
}
componentWillUnmount() {
window.removeEventListener('mousemove', this.logMouseMove)
}
The isMounted approach is an anti-pattern in most cases because it doesn't actually clean up/cancel anything, it just avoids changing state on unmounted components, but does nothing with pending asynchronous tasks. The React team recently removed the leak warning because users keep creating a lot of anti-patterns to hide the warning rather than fix its cause.
But writing cancellable code in plain JS can be really tricky. To fix this I made my own lib useAsyncEffect2 with custom hooks, built on top of a cancellable promise (c-promise2) for executing cancellable async code to reach its graceful cancellation. All async stages (promises), including deep ones, are cancellable. This means that the request here will be automatically aborted if its parent context is canceled. Of course, any other asynchronous operation can be used instead of a request.
useAsyncEffect Demo with plain useState usage (Live Demo):
import React, { useState } from "react";
import { useAsyncEffect } from "use-async-effect2";
import cpAxios from "cp-axios";
function TestComponent({url}) {
const [text, setText] = useState("");
const cancel = useAsyncEffect(
function* () {
setText("fetching...");
const json = (yield cpAxios(url)).data;
setText(`Success: ${JSON.stringify(json)}`);
},
[url]
);
return (
<div>
<div>{text}</div>
<button onClick={cancel}>
Cancel request
</button>
</div>
);
}
useAsyncEffect Demo with internal states usage (Live Demo):
import React from "react";
import { useAsyncEffect } from "use-async-effect2";
import cpAxios from "cp-axios";
function TestComponent({ url, timeout }) {
const [cancel, done, result, err] = useAsyncEffect(
function* () {
return (yield cpAxios(url).timeout(timeout)).data;
},
{ states: true, deps: [url] }
);
return (
<div>
{done ? (err ? err.toString() : JSON.stringify(result)) : "loading..."}
<button onClick={cancel} disabled={done}>
Cancel async effect (abort request)
</button>
</div>
);
}
Class component using decorators (Live demo)
import React, { Component } from "react";
import { ReactComponent } from "c-promise2";
import cpAxios from "cp-axios";
#ReactComponent
class TestComponent extends Component {
state = {
text: ""
};
*componentDidMount(scope) {
const { url, timeout } = this.props;
const response = yield cpAxios(url).timeout(timeout);
this.setState({ text: JSON.stringify(response.data, null, 2) });
}
render() {
return (<div>{this.state.text}</div>);
}
}
export default TestComponent;
More other examples:
Axios request with errors handling
Fetch weather by coords
Live search
Pause & Resume
Progress capturing
Edit: I just realized the warning is referencing a component called TextLayerInternal. That's likely where your bug is. The rest of this is still relevant, but it might not fix your problem.
1) Getting the instance of a component for this warning is tough. It looks like there is some discussion to improve this in React but there currently is no easy way to do it. The reason it hasn't been built yet, I suspect, is likely because components are expected to be written in such a way that setState after unmount isn't possible no matter what the state of the component is. The problem, as far as the React team is concerned, is always in the Component code and not the Component instance, which is why you get the Component Type name.
That answer might be unsatisfactory, but I think I can fix your problem.
2) Lodashes throttled function has a cancel method. Call cancel in componentWillUnmount and ditch the isComponentMounted. Canceling is more "idiomatically" React than introducing a new property.
UPDATE DO NOT USE MY ORIGINAL ANSWER AS IT DOES NOT WORK
This answer was based on the use of cancelable promises and a note in makecancelable which I migrated to use hooks. However, it appears it does not cancel a chain of async/await and even cancelable-promise does not support canceling of a chain of awaits
Doing a bit more research on this, it appears that some internal Google reasons prevented cancelable promises from coming into the standard.
Further more, there was some promise with Bluebird which introduces cancelable promises, but it does not work in Expo or at least I haven't seen an example of it working in Expo.
The accepted answer is the best. Since I use TypeScript I had adapted the code with a few modifications (I explicitly set the dependencies since the accepted answer's implicit dependencies appear to give a re-render loop on my app, added and use async/await rather than promise chain, pass a ref to the mounted object so that an async/await chain can be canceled earlier if needed)
/**
* This starts an async function and executes another function that performs
* React state changes if the component is still mounted after the async
* operation completes
* #template T
* #param {(mountedRef: React.MutableRefObject<boolean>) => Promise<T>} asyncFunction async function,
* it has a copy of the mounted ref so an await chain can be canceled earlier.
* #param {(asyncResult: T) => void} onSuccess this gets executed after async
* function is resolved and the component is still mounted
* #param {import("react").DependencyList} deps
*/
export function useAsyncSetEffect(asyncFunction, onSuccess, deps) {
const mountedRef = useRef(false);
useEffect(() => {
mountedRef.current = true;
(async () => {
const x = await asyncFunction(mountedRef);
if (mountedRef.current) {
onSuccess(x);
}
})();
return () => {
mountedRef.current = false;
};
}, deps);
}
Original answer
Since I have many different operations that are async, I use the cancelable-promise package to resolve this issue with minimal code changes.
Previous code:
useEffect(() =>
(async () => {
const bar = await fooAsync();
setSomeState(bar);
})(),
[]
);
New code:
import { cancelable } from "cancelable-promise";
...
useEffect(
() => {
const cancelablePromise = cancelable(async () => {
const bar = await fooAsync();
setSomeState(bar);
})
return () => cancelablePromise.cancel();
},
[]
);
You can alsowrpte it in a custom utility function like this
/**
* This wraps an async function in a cancelable promise
* #param {() => PromiseLike<void>} asyncFunction
* #param {React.DependencyList} deps
*/
export function useCancelableEffect(asyncFunction, deps) {
useEffect(() => {
const cancelablePromise = cancelable(asyncFunction());
return () => cancelablePromise.cancel();
}, deps);
}
In my case of a login-like screen, the fetch was done in a onClick handler of a parent component, who passed that handler down to the child, whom placed .catch and .finally on it.
In the .then case a redirect (and hence unmount) would happen as normal operation, and only in cases of fetch error would the child stay mounted on-screen.
My solution was moving the setState and all other code from the .finally to the .catch since the child is guaranteed to be mounted in the .catch case. And in the .then case nothing needed doing because of the guaranteed unmount.
Based on #ford04 answer, here is the same encapsulated in a method :
import React, { FC, useState, useEffect, DependencyList } from 'react';
export function useEffectAsync( effectAsyncFun : ( isMounted: () => boolean ) => unknown, deps?: DependencyList ) {
useEffect( () => {
let isMounted = true;
const _unused = effectAsyncFun( () => isMounted );
return () => { isMounted = false; };
}, deps );
}
Usage:
const MyComponent : FC<{}> = (props) => {
const [ asyncProp , setAsyncProp ] = useState( '' ) ;
useEffectAsync( async ( isMounted ) =>
{
const someAsyncProp = await ... ;
if ( isMounted() )
setAsyncProp( someAsyncProp ) ;
});
return <div> ... ;
} ;
Depending on how you open your webpage, you may not be causing a mounting. Such as using a <Link/> back to a page that was already mounted in the virtual DOM, so requiring data from a componentDidMount lifecycle is caught.
Here is a simple solution for this. This warning is due to when we do some fetch request while that request is in the background (because some requests take some time.)and we navigate back from that screen then they react cannot update the state. here is the example code for this. write this line before every state Update.
if(!isScreenMounted.current) return;
Here is the Complete Code
import React , {useRef} from 'react'
import { Text,StatusBar,SafeAreaView,ScrollView, StyleSheet } from 'react-native'
import BASEURL from '../constants/BaseURL';
const SearchScreen = () => {
const isScreenMounted = useRef(true)
useEffect(() => {
return () => isScreenMounted.current = false
},[])
const ConvertFileSubmit = () => {
if(!isScreenMounted.current) return;
setUpLoading(true)
var formdata = new FormData();
var file = {
uri: `file://${route.params.selectedfiles[0].uri}`,
type:`${route.params.selectedfiles[0].minetype}`,
name:`${route.params.selectedfiles[0].displayname}`,
};
formdata.append("file",file);
fetch(`${BASEURL}/UploadFile`, {
method: 'POST',
body: formdata,
redirect: 'manual'
}).then(response => response.json())
.then(result => {
if(!isScreenMounted.current) return;
setUpLoading(false)
}).catch(error => {
console.log('error', error)
});
}
return(
<>
<StatusBar barStyle="dark-content" />
<SafeAreaView>
<ScrollView
contentInsetAdjustmentBehavior="automatic"
style={styles.scrollView}>
<Text>Search Screen</Text>
</ScrollView>
</SafeAreaView>
</>
)
}
export default SearchScreen;
const styles = StyleSheet.create({
scrollView: {
backgroundColor:"red",
},
container:{
flex:1,
justifyContent:"center",
alignItems:"center"
}
})
I solved this problem by providing all the params that are used in the useEffect hook
The code reported the bug:
useEffect(() => {
getDistrict({
geonameid: countryId,
subdistrict: level,
}).then((res) => {
......
});
}, [countryId]);
The code after fix:
useEffect(() => {
getDistrict({
geonameid: countryId,
subdistrict: level,
}).then((res) => {
......
});
}, [countryId,level]);
Can see that , problems solved after I provided all the params(including the level param) that supposed to pass through.
I had a similar problem and solved it :
I was automatically making the user logged-in by dispatching an action on redux
( placing authentication token on redux state )
and then I was trying to show a message with this.setState({succ_message: "...")
in my component.
Component was looking empty with the same error on console : "unmounted component".."memory leak" etc.
After I read Walter's answer up in this thread
I've noticed that in the Routing table of my application ,
my component's route wasn't valid if user is logged-in :
{!this.props.user.token &&
<div>
<Route path="/register/:type" exact component={MyComp} />
</div>
}
I made the Route visible whether the token exists or not.
In my case the issue was that the parent component was hidding the child because of a condition change in the child component.
So what I did was to change the condition so the child component was always shown.
What was happening:
const ParentComponent:FC = () => {
...
if (someCondition) {
return null;
}
return (
<>
Some cool text here
<ChildModalComponent message="this is a cool modal" />
</>
)
}
const ChildModalComponent: FC = () => {
...
const handleSubmit = () => {
setSomeCondition(true);
}
}
So after clicking submit the modal was automatically hidden becasue of the parent condition (someCondition).
How did I fix it?
I changed the place where the someCondition was checked in the Parent component, so the child component was always shown:
const ParentComponent:FC = () => {
...
return (
<>
{!someCondition && <>Some cool text here</>
<ChildModalComponent message="this is a cool modal" />
</>
)
}
I faced same warning, not it is fixed. To fix the issue, I removed the useRef() variable check in useEffect()
Earlier, the code was
const varRef = useRef();
useEffect(() => {
if (!varRef.current)
{
}
}, []);
Now, the code is
const varRef = useRef();
useEffect(() => {
//if (!varRef.current)
{
}
}, [])
Hope, it helps...
Inspired by the accepted answer by #ford04 I had even better approach dealing with it, instead of using useEffect inside useAsync create a new function that returns a callback for componentWillUnmount :
function asyncRequest(asyncRequest, onSuccess, onError, onComplete) {
let isMounted=true
asyncRequest().then((data => isMounted ? onSuccess(data):null)).catch(onError).finally(onComplete)
return () => {isMounted=false}
}
...
useEffect(()=>{
return asyncRequest(()=>someAsyncTask(arg), response=> {
setSomeState(response)
},onError, onComplete)
},[])
const handleClick = async (item: NavheadersType, index: number) => {
const newNavHeaders = [...navheaders];
if (item.url) {
await router.push(item.url); =>>>> line causing error (causing route to happen)
// router.push(item.url); =>>> coreect line
newNavHeaders.forEach((item) => (item.active = false));
newNavHeaders[index].active = true;
setnavheaders([...newNavHeaders]);
}
};
The simplest and most compact solution (with an explanation) is seen below as a one-liner solution.
useEffect(() => { return () => {}; }, []);
The useEffect() example above returns a callback function triggers React to finish its unmount portion of its life-cycle prior to updating state.
That very simplistic solution is all that is needed. In addition, it also works unlike the fictional syntax provided by #ford04 and #sfletche . By the way, the below code snippet from #ford04 is purely imaginary syntax (#sfletche , #vinod , #guneetgstar , and #Drew Cordano used the very same imaginary syntax).
data => {       <--- Fictional/Imaginary Syntax
someAsyncOperation().then(data => {
if (isMounted) setState(data); // add conditional check
})
All of my linters and all the linters of my entire team will not accept it and they report Uncaught SyntaxError: unexpected token: '=>'. I am surprised that no one caught the imaginary syntax. Would anyone who has participated in this question-thread, particularly among the up-voters, explain to me how they got the solutions to work for them?
Inspired by #ford04 answer I use this hook, which also takes callbacks for success, errors, finally and an abortFn:
export const useAsync = (
asyncFn,
onSuccess = false,
onError = false,
onFinally = false,
abortFn = false
) => {
useEffect(() => {
let isMounted = true;
const run = async () => {
try{
let data = await asyncFn()
if (isMounted && onSuccess) onSuccess(data)
} catch(error) {
if (isMounted && onError) onSuccess(error)
} finally {
if (isMounted && onFinally) onFinally()
}
}
run()
return () => {
if(abortFn) abortFn()
isMounted = false
};
}, [asyncFn, onSuccess])
}
If the asyncFn is doing some kind of fetch from back-end it often makes sense to abort it when the component is unmounted (not always though, sometimes if ie. you're loading some data into a store you might as well just want to finish it even if component is unmounted)

Dynamic import of react hooks

Can we dynamically import hooks based on the value passed to the component?
For eg.
App.js
<BaseComponent isActive />
BaseComponent.js
if(props.isActive) {
// import useActive (custom Hook)
}
I donot want these(custom hook) files to be imported and increase the size of BaseComponent even when the props contain falsey values.
You can dynamically import hooks as it is just a function (using require), but you shouldn't because you can't use hooks inside conditions.
See Rules of Hooks
Only call Hooks at the top level. Don’t call Hooks inside loops, conditions, or nested functions.
If you want conditionally use a hook, use the condition in its implementation (look for example at skip option of useQuery hook from Apollo GraphQL Client).
const useActive = (isUsed) => {
if (isUsed) {
// logic
}
}
You should extract the logic inside the useActive hook and dynamically import it instead of dynamically importing the hook since you should not call Hooks inside loops, conditions, or nested functions., checkout Rules of Hooks:
Let's say your useActive hook was trying to update the document title (in real world, it has to be a big chunk of code that you would consider using dynamic import)
It might be implemented as below:
// useActive.js
import { useEffect } from "react";
export function useActive() {
useEffect(() => {
document.title = "(Active) Hello World!";
}, []);
}
And you tried to use it in the BaseComponent:
// BaseComponent.js
function BaseComponent({ isActive }) {
if (isActive) { // <-- call Hooks inside conditions ❌
import("./useActive").then(({ useActive }) => {
useActive();
});
}
return <p>Base</p>;
}
Here you violated the rule "don't call Hooks inside conditions" and will get an Invalid hook call. error.
So instead of dynamically import the hook, you can extract the logic inside the hook and dynamically import it:
// updateTitle.js
export function updateTitle() {
document.title = "(Active) Hello World!"
}
And you do the isActive check inside the hook:
// BaseComponent.js
function BaseComponent({ isActive }) {
useEffect(() => {
if (!isActive) return;
import("./updateTitle").then(({ updateTitle }) => {
updateTitle();
});
}, [isActive]);
return <p>Base</p>;
}
It works fine without violating any rules of hooks.
I have attached a CodeSandbox for you to play around:
You could create a Higher Order Component that fetches the hook and then passes it down as a prop to a wrapped component. By doing so the wrapped component can use the hook without breaking the rules of hooks, eg from the wrapped component's point of view, the reference to the hook never changes and the hook gets called everytime the wrapped component renders. Here is what the code would look like:
export function withDynamicHook(hookName, importFunc, Component) {
return (props) => {
const [hook, setHook] = useState();
useEffect(() => {
importFunc().then((mod) => setHook(() => mod[hookName]));
}, []);
if (!hook) {
return null;
}
const newProps = { ...props, [hookName]: hook };
return <Component {...newProps} />;
};
}
// example of a Component using it:
const MyComponent = ({useMyHook}) => {
let something = useMyHook();
console.log(something)
return <div>myHook returned something, see the console to inspect it </div>
}
const MyComponentWithHook = withDynamicHook('useMyHook', () => import('module-containing-usemyhook'), MyComponent)
To whoever encountered it as well: You can't use Hooks inside dynamically imported components(however, apparently if you does not use hooks even the first example works):
instead of:
const useDynamicDemoImport = (name) => {
const [comp, setComp] = useState(null);
useEffect(() => {
let resolvedComp = false;
import(`#site/src/demos/${name}`)
.then((m) => {
if (!resolvedComp) {
resolvedComp = true;
setComp(m.default);
}
})
.catch(console.error);
return () => {
resolvedComp = true;
};
}, []);
return comp;
};
const DemoPreviewer: FC<DemoPreviewerProps> = (props) => {
comp = useDynamicDemoImport(props.name);
return (
<Paper sx={{ position: "relative" }}>
{comp}
</Paper>
);
};
export default DemoPreviewer
use React Lazy instead and render the component later
const useDynamicDemoImport = (name) => {
const Comp = React.lazy(() => import(`#site/src/demos/${name}`));
return comp;
};
const RootDemoPreviewer: FC<DemoPreviewerProps> = (props) => {
console.log("RootDemoPreviewer");
return (
<React.Suspense fallback={<div>Loading...</div>}>
<DemoPreviewer {...props} />
</React.Suspense>
);
};
const DemoPreviewer: FC<DemoPreviewerProps> = (props) => {
const Comp = useDynamicDemoImport(props.name);
return (
<Paper sx={{ position: "relative" }}>
<Comp />
</Paper>
);
};
export default RootDemoPreviewer

Testing method inside functional component in React using Jest / Enzyme

Following is my React Functional Component which I am trying to test using jest / enzyme.
React Functional Component Code -
export const UserForm = props => {
const {labels, formFields, errorMessages} = props;
const [showModal, setShowModal] = React.useState(false);
const [newId, setNewId] = React.useState('');
const showModal = () => {
setShowModal(true);
}
const closeModal = () => {
setShowModal(false);
};
const handleSubmit = data => {
Post(url, data)
.then(resp => {
const userData = resp.data;
setNewId(() => userData.id);
showModal();
})
}
return (
<div className="user-form">
<UserForm
fields={formFields}
handleSubmit={handleSubmit}
labels={labels}
errors={errorMessages}
/>
{showModal && <Modal closeModal={closeModal}>
<div className="">
<h3>Your new id is - {newId}</h3>
<Button
type="button"
buttonLabel="Close"
handleClick={closeModal}
classes="btn btn-close"
/>
</div>
</Modal>}
</div>
)
};
Now I am trying to test showModal, closeModal and handleSubmit method, but my tests are failing. Let me know the correct way of testing React Hooks and methods inside functional component.
My test case -
import React from 'react';
import { UserForm } from '../index';
import { shallow } from 'enzyme';
describe('<UserForm />', () => {
let wrapper;
const labels = {
success: 'Success Message'
};
const formFields = [];
const errorMessages = {
labels: {
firstName: 'First Name Missing'
}
};
function renderShallow() {
wrapper = shallow(<UserForm
labels={labels}
formFields={formFields}
errorMessages={errorMessages}
/>);
}
it('should render with props(snapshot)', () => {
renderShallow();
expect(wrapper).toMatchSnapshot();
});
it('should test showModal method', () => {
const mockSetShowModal = jest.fn();
React.useState = jest.fn(() => [false, mockSetShowModal]);
renderShallow();
expect(mockSetShowModal).toHaveBeenCalledWith(true);
});
});
Error I am getting -
Expected mock function to have been called with:
[true]
But it was not called.
Let me know how can i test the showModal, closeModal and handleSubmit methods in a functional component.
Generally, functional components in React aren't meant to be tested in that way. The React team are suggesting that you use the approach of React Testing Library which is more focused on the actual user interface scenarios. Instead of testing React component instances, you're testing DOM nodes.
This is the main reason why people are moving away from Enzyme and starting to use RTL, because you want to avoid testing implementation details as much as you can.

Categories

Resources