I've seen this question before but only applied to Class components so I am not sure how to apply the same approach for functional components.
It's simple, I have a link <Link to={{ pathname="/first-page" state: { name: "First person" }>First Page</Link> and then in the component FirstPage.js I need to read the name state so I have tried the following:
import React from "react";
export default props => {
React.useEffect(() => {
console.log(props)
}, []);
return (
<div>
<h1>First Page</h1>
<p>Welcome to first page, {props.location.state.name}</p>
</div>
);
};
I have been reading React Router location documentation and it should pass the state as a component property but it isn't. I am quite sure there is something I am doing wrong or not seeing at all.
In case you wanna give a try on the whole code, I will leave here a CodeSandbox project to "test" this.
Therefore, any ideas on what am I doing wrong? Thanks in advance.
This isn't an issue of class-based vs. functional component, but rather how Routes work. Wrapped children don't receive the route params, but anything rendered using the Route's component, render, or children prop do.
Route render methods
<Switch>
<Route path="/first-page" component={FirstPage} />
<Route path="/second-page" component={SecondPage} />
</Switch>
The other option is to export a decorated page component using the withRouter HOC, or if a functional component, use hooks.
withRouter
You can get access to the history object’s properties and the closest
<Route>'s match via the withRouter higher-order component. withRouter
will pass updated match, location, and history props to the wrapped
component whenever it renders.
const FirstPage = props => {
React.useEffect(() => {
console.log(props)
}, []);
return (
<div>
<h1>First Page</h1>
<p>Welcome to first page, {props.location.state.name}</p>
</div>
);
};
export default withRouter(FirstPage);
hooks
React Router ships with a few hooks that let you access the state of
the router and perform navigation from inside your components.
const FirstPage = props => {
const location = useLocation();
console.log(location);
return (
<div>
<h1>First Page</h1>
<p>Welcome to first page, {location.state.name}</p>
</div>
);
};
export default FirstPage;
I found a problem in your router. Instead of using:
<Route path="/first-page">
<FirstPage/>
</Route>
Use:
<Route path="/first-page" component={FirstPage}/>
Otherwise use the hook provided by the library let location = useLocation();, this way you will have access to the location object.
Related
I have a header that appears in 95% of pages in my site, so I mount it in my main App component. For the other 5% of pages though I need it to be gone.
I figured a good way to do it would be to change a state from true to false based on the current route, and that state would determine whether the header mounts or not.
at first I tried just using window.location.href as a useEffect dependency but that didn't seem to work. I've read about the option to listen to the location of the history, but I keep getting Cannot read property 'history' of undefined. I thing that perhaps it's because I am using a custom history component, or maybe because I try to do so in my main App component? Not sure.
This is my history object:
import { createBrowserHistory } from 'history';
export default createBrowserHistory();
I use it in my Router like this:
<Router history={history}>
CONDITIONAL COMPONENT
<Switch>
...routes
</Switch>
</Router>
This is how I try to listen, where history is my custom history object
const MyHistory = useHistory(history)
useEffect(() => {
return MyHistory.listen((location) => {
console.log(`You changed the page to: ${location.pathname}`)
})
},[MyHistory])
You are trying to use useHistory within a component that renders Router which is a Provider. In order for useHistory to Work it needs to have a Router higher up in the hierarchy.
So either you wrap the App component with Router like
export default () => (
<Router history={history}><App /><Router>
)
or since you define a custom history you can use it directly without using useHistory
useEffect(() => {
return history.listen((location) => {
console.log(`You changed the page to: ${location.pathname}`)
})
},[])
This is how I control every route change in my App. I created a component that listen to the pathname property given by useLocation
import { useEffect } from "react";
import { useLocation } from "react-router-dom";
export default function AppScrollTop() {
const { pathname } = useLocation();
useEffect(() => {
console.log(`You changed the page to: ${pathname}`)
}, [pathname]);
return null;
}
Then I put the component inside the <Router>
<BrowserRouter>
<AppScrollTop />
<Switch>
<Route path="/login" component={Login} />
</Switch>
</BrowserRouter>
I hope this helps.
I'm kind of new to reactjs and I'm learning step by step. I'm facing a problem and that is when I try to access the location parameter in the props it returns me undefined. I tried to find the solution but most of the people have written I have to add my component in the router but I'm wrapping it in the router but still, I don't have access to location parameter
export const abcdContainer = withRouter(connect(
mapStateToProps,
mapDispatchToProps
)(abcd));
I'm trying to access the location parameter in the and component but the problem is there is no location parameter in it. Can somebody tell me what is it that is going wrong
Please if anybody know what is wrong please tell me I have spent half of my day and I can't figure it out
CODE AND VERSION ADDED WITH URL
Router version => 2.8.1
URL : http://localhost:3000/somePage?someParam=cm9oYW5qYWxpbHRlYWNoZXJAZ21haWwuY29t
abcdContainer.js
const mapStateToProps = (state, ownProps) => {
// some code over here
}
const mapDispatchToProps = (dispatch, ownProps) => {
// some code over here
};
export const abcdContainer = withRouter(connect(
mapStateToProps,
mapDispatchToProps
)(abcd));
abcd.jsx
class abcd extends Component {
constructor(props, context) {
super(props, context);
this.state = {
// setting state over here
};
}
abcdFunction(){
if (this.props.location.query.someParam !== undefined){ // trying to extract someParam value from location
// some code over here
}
}
render() {
// some code over here
}
}
export default CSSModules(abcd, styles, { allowMultiple: true });
Here is the flow. The router redirect to the container and then the container redirect to the real component
Route.js
export const Routes = ({ store }) => (
<Provider store={store}>
<Router history={browserHistory}>
<Route path="/" component={aContainer}>
<IndexRoute component={IContainer} />
// some routes
<Route path="/openAbcd" component={() => (<abcdContainer caller="aaaaaaa" />)} />
// some routes
</Route>
// some routes
</Router>
</Provider>
);
Routes.propTypes = {
store: React.PropTypes.object.isRequired,
};
<Route path="/openAbcd" component={() => (<abcdContainer caller="aaaaaaa" />)} />
If you use an inline arrow function to render your component why you don't just pass the props directly to the component? Then you will not need withRouter(). Like this:
<Route path="/openAbcd" component={props => (<abcdContainer caller="aaaaaaa" {...props} />)} />
Also the docs of react-router v2.8.1 says about withRouter():
A HoC (higher-order component) that wraps another component to provide props.router.
It doesn't provide location but router as a prop. I recommend you to update react-router to v4 or at least v3.
EDIT: "But why were the props not being inserted implicitly?":
React knows two types of components. Stateless functional components and class-based components. Functional components are functions that accept a single props object argument with data and return a React element. Take a look at this line of your code again:
<Route path="/openAbcd" component={() => (<abcdContainer caller="aaaaaaa" />)} />
You passed an arrow function () => (<abcdContainer caller="aaaaaaa" />) to your <Route> element which is an inline definition of a functional component that takes props as a parameter and returns a rendered React element, in this case this is your <abcdContainer>. But as you can see you omitted the props parameter in your function by defining it with empty parenthesis: () => (<AComponent />). React does not automatically pass props to child components that are rendered inside a functional component. When wrapping your <abcdContainer> into an inline functional component you are responsible for passing props to it yourself.
But if you pass the class/variable of your class-based/functional component to the component prop of your <Route> element like you did it in your other routes then it will render this component an implicitly pass props to it because it isn't wrapped in a functional component:
// this will directly render <aContainer> and pass the props to it
<Route path="/" component={aContainer}>
What you did is creating a "functional unnamed wrapper component" that doesn't take any props and also doesn't pass any props further down.
And note that you should not use withRouter() extensively. This HOC is only there to inject a router into components that do not get rendered by a matching route itself and are e.g. much deeper down your component tree. In your case you do not need it.
I'm trying to route programatically using this.props.history.push(..) but it doesn't seem to work.
Here's the router:
import {
BrowserRouter as Router,
Route
} from 'react-router-dom';
<Router>
<Route path="/customers/" exact component={CustomersList} />
<Route path="/customers/:id" exact component="{Customer} />
</Router>
In CustomerList, a list of customers is rendered. Clicking on a customer (li) should make the application route to Customer:
import { withRouter } from 'react-router'
class Customers extends Component {
static propTypes = {
history: PropTypes.object.isRequired
}
handleCustomerClick(customer) {
this.props.history.push(`/customers/${customer.id}`);
}
render() {
return(
<ul>
{ this.props.customers.map((c) =>
<li onClick={() => this.handleCustomerClick(c)} key={c.id}>
{c.name}
</li>
</ul>
)
}
}
//connect to redux to get customers
CustomersList = withRouter(CustomersList);
export default CustomersList;
The code is partial but illustrates perfectly the situation.
What happens is that the browser's address bar changes accordingly to history.push(..), but the view does not update, Customer component is not rendered and CustomersList is still there. Any ideas?
So I came to this question hoping for an answer but to no avail. I have used
const { history } = this.props;
history.push("/thePath")
In the same project and it worked as expected.
Upon further experimentation and some comparing and contrasting, I realized that this code will not run if it is called within the nested component. Therefore only the rendered page component can call this function for it to work properly.
Find Working Sandbox here
history: v4.7.2
react: v16.0.0
react-dom: v16.0.0
react-router-dom:
v4.2.2
It seems things have changed around a bit in the latest version of react router. You can now access history via the context. this.context.history.push('/path')
Also see the replies to the this github issue: https://github.com/ReactTraining/react-router/issues/4059
You can try to load the child component with history. to do so, pass 'history' through props. Something like that:
return (
<div>
<Login history={this.props.history} />
<br/>
<Register/>
</div>
)
For me (react-router v4, react v16) the problem was that I had the navigation component all right:
import { Link, withRouter } from 'react-router-dom'
class MainMenu extends Component {
render() {
return (
...
<NavLink to="/contact">Contact</NavLink>
...
);
}
}
export default withRouter(MainMenu);
Both using either
to="/contact"
or
OnClick={() => this.props.history.push('/contact')};
The behavior was still the same - the URL in browser changed but wrong components were rendered, the router was called with the same old URL.
The culprit was in the router definition. I had to move the MainMenu component as a child of the Router component!
// wrong placement of the component that calls the router
<MainMenu history={this.props.history} />
<Router>
<div>
// this is the right place for the component!
<MainMenu history={this.props.history} />
<Route path="/" exact component={MainPage} />
<Route path="/contact/" component={MainPage} />
</div>
</Router>
You can get access to the history object's properties and the closest 's match via the withRouter higher-order component. withRouter will pass updated match, location, and history props to the wrapped component whenever it renders.
import React, { Component } from 'react'
import { withRouter } from 'react-router';
// you can also import "withRouter" from 'react-router-dom';
class Example extends Component {
render() {
const { match, location, history } = this.props
return (
<div>
<div>You are now at {location.pathname}</div>
<button onClick={() => history.push('/')}>{'Home'}</button>
</div>
)
}
}
export default withRouter(Example)
Seems like an old question but still relevant.
I think it is a blocked update issue.
The main problem is the new URL (route) is supposed to be rendered by the same component(Costumers) as you are currently in (current URL).
So solution is rather simple, make the window url as a prop, so react has a chance to detect the prop change (therefore the url change), and act accordingly.
A nice usecase described in the official react blog called Recommendation: Fully uncontrolled component with a key.
So the solution is to change from
render() {
return(
<ul>
to
render() {
return(
<ul key={this.props.location.pathname}>
So whenever the location changed by react-router, the component got scrapped (by react) and a new one gets initiated with the right values (by react).
Oh, and pass the location as prop to the component(Costumers) where the redirect will happen if it is not passed already.
Hope it helps someone.
I had similar symptoms, but my problem was that I was nesting BrowserRouter
Do not nest BrowserRouter, because the history object will refer to the nearest BrowserRouter parent. So when you do a history.push(targeturl) and that targeturl it's not in that particular BrowserRouter it won't match any of it's route, so it will not load any sub-component.
Solution
Nest the Switch without wrapping it with a BrowserRouter
Example
Let's consider this App.js file
<BrowserRouter>
<Switch>
<Route exact path="/nestedrouter" component={NestedRouter} />
<Route exact path="/target" component={Target} />
</Switch>
</BrowserRouter>
Instead of doing this in the NestedRouter.js file
<BrowserRouter>
<Switch>
<Route exact path="/nestedrouter/" component={NestedRouter} />
<Route exact path="/nestedrouter/subroute" component={SubRoute} />
</Switch>
</BrowserRouter>
Simply remove the BrowserRouter from NestedRouter.js file
<Switch>
<Route exact path="/nestedrouter/" component={NestedRouter} />
<Route exact path="/nestedrouter/subroute" component={SubRoute} />
</Switch>
Let's consider this scenario. You have App.jsx as the root file for you ReactJS SPA. In it your render() looks similar to this:
<Switch>
<Route path="/comp" component={MyComponent} />
</Switch>
then, you should be able to use this.props.history inside MyComponent without a problem. Let's say you are rendering MySecondComponent inside MyComponent, in that case you need to call it in such manner:
<MySecondComponent {...props} />
which will pass the props from MyComponent down to MySecondComponent, thus making this.props.history available in MySecondComponent
You need to export the Customers Component not the CustomerList.
CustomersList = withRouter(Customers);
export default CustomersList;
I see that you are using a class component but in case you decide to switch to functional component or encountered the same issue with a functional component in your application, you can fix this issue by using the "useHistory" hook API by react-router-dom.
Example of usage:
import { useHistory } from "react-router-dom";
const Customers = ({customer}) => {
let history = useHistory();
const handleCustomerClick = (customer) => {
history.push(`/customers/${customer.id}`);
}
return (
//some JSX here
);
};
You may find the official documentation here: https://reactrouter.com/web/api/Hooks/usehistory
Beginner's mistake when working with routing is the importance of using withRouter directly with the component and not put any other high order component in between (or at least one that doest not know to push the props.history to its children:
Wrong: export default withRouter(withErrorHandler(Foo));
Correct: export default withErrorHandler(withRouter(Foo));
`const navigate=useNavigate();
navigate(/customers/${customer.id}); `
Don't use with Router.
handleSubmit(e){
e.preventDefault();
this.props.form.validateFieldsAndScroll((err,values)=>{
if(!err){
this.setState({
visible:false
});
this.props.form.resetFields();
console.log(values.username);
const path = '/list/';
this.props.history.push(path);
}
})
}
It works well.
You need to bind handleCustomerClick:
class Customers extends Component {
constructor() {
super();
this.handleCustomerClick = this.handleCustomerClick(this)
}
this.props.history.push(`/customers/${customer.id}`, null);
I'm trying to create an Electron app using React, React-router and Redux. What I'm finding is that my routing logic works absolutely fine when I'm nesting the switch/route logic under a purely presentational component (Page), but that I'm forced to refresh the page to see navigational changes if nested under a 'smart' container component.
Near the top of my React component hierarchy (right beneath HashRouter) I have a Page:
export default function Page (props) {
return (
<div className={`${styles.page}`}>
<SideBar/>
<DetailPane>{props.children}</DetailPane>
</div>
);
}
Here, DetailPane and SideBar are both container components wrapped around presentational components of the same name.
At startup (and during hot reloads), I create my React hierarchy using this function:
export default () => (
<Router>
<Page>
<Switch>
<Route exact path='/txDefinitions/:definitionName/:fieldName' component={FieldPage}/>
<Route exact path='/txDefinitions/:definitionName?' component={DefinitionPage}/>
<Route exact path='/rxDefinitions/:definitionName?' component={DefinitionPage}/>
<Route exact path='/'/>
<Route component={Route404}/>
</Switch>
</Page>
</Router>
This means that <Switch>...</Switch> gets nested underneath <DetailPane>.
If I try to navigate around my app (clicking links in the side bar), I won't actually see the detail pane render the new component until I force-reload the Electron app.
However, I find that routing works as expected if I omit DetailPane from Page:
export default function Page (props) {
return (
<div className={`${styles.page}`}>
<SideBar/>
{props.children}
</div>
);
}
Here is my React hierarchy without DetailPane (works fine):
Here is my React hierarchy with DetailPane (does not work right):
(Apologies for using images but I'm not sure if there's a way to copy from React devtools into clipboard - appears larger if opened in a new tab).
As I was writing this question, I realised this wouldn't be a huge issue for me because earlier refactoring had made the 'smart' version of DetailPane apparently obsolete. Using the purely presentational version of DetailPane
instead resolves this issue:
import * as React from 'react';
//import {DetailPane} from '../../containers'; // Smart/Redux
import {DetailPane} from '../../components'; // Dumb/presentational
import {SideBar} from '../../containers/';
const styles = require('./Page.scss');
export default function Page (props) {
return (
<div className={`${styles.page}`}>
<SideBar/>
<DetailPane>{props.children}</DetailPane>
</div>
);
}
However, I'm still curious why this doesn't work for the container component version. For reference, this is the container component version of DetailPane:
import {connect} from 'react-redux';
import {DetailPane} from '../../components';
// TODO: delete this container?
function mapStateToProps (state): {} {
return {};
}
function mapDispatchToProps (dispatch) {
// TODO.
return {};
}
export default connect(mapStateToProps, mapDispatchToProps)(DetailPane);
The connect HOC implements shouldComponentUpdate logic so if the props don't change, the component doesn't update.
To prevent this from occurring, and have the component always render, you can override the pure option in the connect call.
export default connect(mapStateToProps, mapDispatchToProps, undefined, { pure: false })(DetailPane);
See the react-redux API docs for more details.
Using redux and react router, I would like to access a route parameter on a component other than the one specified by the route.
I've got react-router, redux, and react-router-redux set up as follows and I would like to access the reportId parameter from my redux store.
const history = syncHistoryWithStore(browserHistory, store);
const store = createStore(reducers);
const routes = (
<Router history={history}>
<Route path="/" component={MainLayout} >
<IndexRoute component={Home} />
<Route path="reports">
<Route path=":reportId" component={ReportViewerContainer} />
</Route>
</Route>
</Router>
);
ReactDOM.render(
<Provider store={store}>{router}</Provider>,
document.getElementById('root')
);
I've tried hooking up react-redux-router to store the route state, but I've found that there is nothing useful stored inside of redux besides the full path to the active route. This has left me with the options of either parsing out the reportId from the path in redux, or creating my own custom action in redux and updating it with the componentWillReceiveProps lifecycle method inside of my ReportViewerContainer component. There must be a better way?
If you want to access the router parameter inside the component, the best way to achieve this by using withRouter
https://egghead.io/lessons/javascript-redux-using-withrouter-to-inject-the-params-into-connected-components
You will find the better understanding with above example.
If you want to access the router in the redux store, there's a HOC called withRouter (docs). If I remember correctly, this will pass any router state to your component as props.
The only change you need to make to your component would be this:
import { withRouter } from 'react-router'
export default withRouter(ReportViewerContainer);
So I think you can use context to fetch the location that will be passed through the Router. ( Refer that link on how it works.) This should give you a solid direction to work on.
This can also help you down the lane to work with internationalization as well.
class MyComponent extends React.Component {
static contextTypes = {
router: React.PropTypes.object
};
render(){
// By declaring context type here, and childContextTypes
// on the parent along with a function with how to get it,
// React will traverse up and look for the `router` context.
// It will then inject it into `this.context`, making it
// available here.
}
}