Where (in an object3d) can I find the changing point coordinates? - javascript

This shows one point rotating around the Y axis.
I want to see the changing X coordinate as it rotates.
This shows the starting coordinate, but it doesn't change.
The varying coordinates must be somewhere, right? Where?
I thought "pointa.geometry.vertices[0].x" would be the place.
EDIT: I made the rotating point a rotating Group under a fixed Scene.
<!doctype html>
<html>
<head>
<title> a point </title>
<script src="http://threejs.org/build/three.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript">
"use strict";
var js3canvas, renderer, camera, world, pointa, geometry, material, datadiv;
var norotate;
window.onload = function() {
"use strict";
js3canvas = document.getElementById("js3canvas");
datadiv = document.getElementById("data");
renderer = new THREE.WebGLRenderer( { canvas:js3canvas } );
camera = new THREE.PerspectiveCamera(50, 1, 1, 20);
camera.position.set(0,5,10);
camera.lookAt(0,0,0);
norotate = new THREE.Scene();
norotate.background = new THREE.Color(0x888888);
world = new THREE.Group();
norotate.add(world);
// make point
geometry = new THREE.Geometry();
geometry.vertices.push(new THREE.Vector3(2.3456,0,0));
material = new THREE.PointsMaterial( { color:0xffffff } );
pointa = new THREE.Points(geometry, material);
world.add(pointa);
animate();
}
function animate() {
datadiv.innerHTML = "X coordinate: " + pointa.geometry.vertices[0].x; // the x coordinate
renderer.render( norotate, camera );
world.rotateY(.03);
requestAnimationFrame(animate);
}
</script>
</head>
<body>
<canvas width="200" height="200" id="js3canvas"></canvas>
<div id="data"></div>
</body>
</html>

When you change rotation or position or scale of an object, you apply just a transform matrix to the points of a geometry, keeping data of the points intact.
Set a temp vector, copy a vertex into this vector, cast from local to world coordinate system:
var js3canvas, renderer, camera, world, pointa, geometry, material, datadiv;
var norotate;
js3canvas = document.getElementById("js3canvas");
datadiv = document.getElementById("data");
renderer = new THREE.WebGLRenderer({
canvas: js3canvas
});
camera = new THREE.PerspectiveCamera(50, 1, 1, 20);
camera.position.set(0, 5, 10);
camera.lookAt(0, 0, 0);
norotate = new THREE.Scene();
norotate.background = new THREE.Color(0x888888);
world = new THREE.Group();
norotate.add(world);
// make point
geometry = new THREE.Geometry();
geometry.vertices.push(new THREE.Vector3(2.3456, 0, 0));
material = new THREE.PointsMaterial({
color: 0xffffff
});
pointa = new THREE.Points(geometry, material);
world.add(pointa);
var tempV3 = new THREE.Vector3();
animate();
function animate() {
pointa.localToWorld(tempV3.copy(pointa.geometry.vertices[0]));
datadiv.innerHTML = "X coordinate: " + tempV3.x; // the x coordinate
renderer.render(norotate, camera);
world.rotateY(.03);
requestAnimationFrame(animate);
}
<canvas width="200" height="200" id="js3canvas"></canvas>
<div id="data"></div>
<script src="http://threejs.org/build/three.js"></script>

Related

Rendering Complicated Models in Three.js

if some rockstar could look through my code real quick and tell me why I cant render/see my three.js model I'd be forever in your debt!
I'll post the whole script, but I think some preliminary info is important. Basically, I have thousands of points that look like this:
472232.14363148 2943288.56768013 200.129142"
472237.03086105 2943289.62356560 200.119496"
472241.91809061 2943290.67945108 200.109851"
472246.80532018 2943291.73533656 200.100205"
...and so on...
and a bunch of faces that look like this:
["1021 1020 1061", "640 754 641", "1534 1633 1535", "4701 27 26", "654 753 655", ...and so on...
When I extracted all the data and configured it correctly I then push it to the geometry and try to add it to the scene but with no success. Here's the whole script:
var renderer = new THREE.WebGLRenderer();
renderer.setSize( window.innerWidth, window.innerHeight );
document.body.appendChild( renderer.domElement );
var camera = new THREE.PerspectiveCamera( 45, window.innerWidth / window.innerHeight, 1, 1000 );
camera.position.set( 0, 50, 50 );
camera.lookAt( 0, 0, 0 );
var scene = new THREE.Scene();
var material = new THREE.MeshStandardMaterial( { color : 0x00cc00 } );
var geometry = new THREE.Geometry();
var points = bigData['LandXML']['Surfaces']['Surface']['Definition']['Pnts']['P']
var faces = bigData['LandXML']['Surfaces']['Surface']['Definition']['Faces']['F']
for(i=0;i<points.length;i++){
var [point1,point2,point3] = points[i]['__text'].split(' ').map(Number)
//point1 *= .00001
//point2 *= .00001
//point3 *= .00001
geometry.vertices.push(new THREE.Vector3(point1,point2,point3))
}
for(i=0;i<faces.length;i++){
console.log(faces[i]);
var [face1,face2,face3] = faces[i].split(' ').map(Number)
var face = new THREE.Face3(face1 - 1,face2 - 1, face3 - 1)
geometry.faces.push(face)
}
scene.add( new THREE.Mesh( geometry, material ) );
You can see that in the for loop for the points, I have multiplied them by .00001 to scale the model because otherwise the numbers are so huge, if that makes sense. And I subtract 1 from each face because the data was not zero indexed. Anyways, if any coding superhero took the time to read this and has some insight, please help me out! Thanks!
So, I found your model on scene, the code missed those parts:
Your model has big coordinates, but small dimension. After dividing
all coordinates by 100.000 it has boundingSphere center at (4.72;
29,432; 0,00192) and boundingSphere radius 0,00480, So you need
to either translate model so it has center at (0;0;0) or move camera
target to it's center;
geometry.computeFaceNormals() must be called after building faces
in order to make faces resposive to lighting and shading;
Scene needs some light in it. In curent state it will not show
anything
Render loop or at least single call after adding mesh is required.
Here is fixed code, additionally I played with camera distance and added simple rotation animation. Also I used geometry translation approach to have an adequate rotation:
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en" dir="ltr">
<head>
<meta charset="utf-8">
<title>DXF Test</title>
</head>
<body>
<script src="three.min.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="JFM.js"></script>
<script>
var renderer = new THREE.WebGLRenderer();
renderer.setSize(window.innerWidth, window.innerHeight);
document.body.appendChild(renderer.domElement);
var camera = new THREE.PerspectiveCamera(45, window.innerWidth / window.innerHeight, 1, 2000);
camera.position.set(0, 650, 650);
camera.lookAt(0, 0, 0);
var scene = new THREE.Scene();
var material = new THREE.MeshStandardMaterial({color: 0x00cc00});
var geometry = new THREE.Geometry();
//geometry.vertices.push(new THREE.Vector3(4.72227256402, 29.4328751179, 0.00200138787));
//geometry.vertices.push(new THREE.Vector3(3, 3, 0));
//geometry.vertices.push(new THREE.Vector3(5, 6, 0));
//var line = new THREE.Line( geometry, material );
//scene.add( line );
//renderer.render( scene, camera );
var points = bigData['LandXML']['Surfaces']['Surface']['Definition']['Pnts']['P'];
var faces = bigData['LandXML']['Surfaces']['Surface']['Definition']['Faces']['F'];
console.log('Complete XML file');
console.log(bigData);
console.log('POINTS');
console.log(points);
console.log('FACES');
console.log(faces);
for (i = 0; i < points.length; i++) {
var [point1, point2, point3] = points[i]['__text'].split(' ').map(Number);
geometry.vertices.push(new THREE.Vector3(point1, point2, point3));
}
for (i = 0; i < faces.length; i++) {
var [face1, face2, face3] = faces[i].split(' ').map(Number);
var face = new THREE.Face3(face1 - 1, face3 - 1, face2 - 1);
geometry.faces.push(face)
}
geometry.computeFaceNormals();
geometry.computeBoundingSphere();
// translate model so it's real center will be the same as mesh pivot
geometry.translate(
-geometry.boundingSphere.center.x,
-geometry.boundingSphere.center.y,
-geometry.boundingSphere.center.z
);
// compute bounding sphere again, because it was broken during translation
geometry.computeBoundingSphere();
var mesh = new THREE.Mesh(geometry, material);
scene.add(mesh);
var sunLight = new THREE.DirectionalLight(0xffffff);
sunLight.position.set(200, 600, 1000);
scene.add(sunLight);
function animate() {
requestAnimationFrame(animate);
renderer.render(scene, camera);
mesh.rotation.y += 0.01;
mesh.rotation.x += 0.01;
}
animate();
</script>
</body>
</html>
If you don't like translation, you can remove it, remove rotation and after computeBoundingSphere do like this:
camera.position.set(
geometry.boundingSphere.center.x + geometry.boundingSphere.radius,
geometry.boundingSphere.center.y + geometry.boundingSphere.radius,
geometry.boundingSphere.center.z + geometry.boundingSphere.radius,
);
camera.lookAt(
geometry.boundingSphere.center.x,
geometry.boundingSphere.center.y,
geometry.boundingSphere.center.z,
);
Hope it will help.

Unable to map texture on to mesh in three.js

I've been working on putting together a very simple program that will create a height map from an image and texture that image in three.js
After a bit of hacking around I can generate the height map/mesh from an image quite easily but I cannot map a texture to this mesh object. I'm not sure where I'm going wrong although I'm pretty sure it is in the addMesh(); function. This is my first attempt with three.js so it may well be something very obvious.
The error I am thrown is:
THREE.Material: 'map' parameter is undefined.
This is what is rendered:
This is the code I'm using:
// Define variables
var camera, scene, renderer, geometry, material, mesh;
var img = document.getElementById("landscape-image");
var texture = new THREE.TextureLoader().load( "assets/texture.png" )
// Get the pixels by draw the image onto a canvas. From the canvas get the Pixel (R,G,B,A)
function getTerrainPixelData(){
var canvas = document.getElementById("canvas");
canvas.width = img.width;
canvas.height = img.height;
canvas.getContext('2d').drawImage(img, 0, 0, img.width, img.height);
var data = canvas.getContext('2d').getImageData(0,0, img.height, img.width).data;
var normPixels = []
for (var i = 0, n = data.length; i < n; i += 4) {
// get the average value of R, G and B.
normPixels.push((data[i] + data[i+1] + data[i+2]) / 3); //Essentially render image black and white
}
return normPixels;
}
// Create a mesh from pixel data
function addMesh() {
var numSegments = img.width-1; //Equal to number of image pixels - 1
geometry = new THREE.PlaneGeometry(2400, 2400, numSegments, numSegments);
material = new THREE.MeshBasicMaterial({
wireframe: true,
map: texture
});
terrain = getTerrainPixelData();
for (var i = 0, l = geometry.vertices.length; i < l; i++) // For each vertex
{
var terrainValue = terrain[i] / 255;
geometry.vertices[i].z = geometry.vertices[i].z + terrainValue * 800 ; // Define height of vertices against image pixel data
}
mesh = new THREE.Mesh(geometry, material);
scene.add(mesh)
}
// Function to render scene and camera
function render() {
requestAnimationFrame(render);
renderer.render(scene, camera);
}
scene = new THREE.Scene();
camera = new THREE.PerspectiveCamera(70, window.innerWidth / window.innerHeight, 0.1, 10000); //Field-of-View, Aspect Ratio, Near Render, Far Render
camera.position.z = 3000; // Camera distance
renderer = new THREE.WebGLRenderer();
controls = new THREE.OrbitControls( camera, renderer.domElement );
addMesh();
renderer.setSize(window.innerWidth, window.innerHeight);
document.body.appendChild(renderer.domElement);
render();
body {
margin: 0;
}
#canvas {
display: none;
}
#assets {
display: none;
}
<html>
<head>
<title>Landscape Test</title>
<link rel="stylesheet" href="style.css">
</head>
<body>
<div id="assets"><img id="landscape-image" src="assets/Heightmap2.png"/></div>
<canvas id="canvas"></canvas>
<script src="js/three.min.js"></script>
<script src="js/OrbitControls.js"></script> <!-- added so user can rotate the scene with the mouse -->
<script src="js/app.js"></script>
</body>
</html>

three.js - How to set camera position?

I'm pretty beginner in three.js and webgl programming. so I have created a box in three.js and its working fine but the problem is when I set camera position in z axis(eg: camera.position.z = 2; ) the box just disappears. could anyone explain me why is it happening and how can I properly set the position of the camera?
try uncommenting the camera.position.z = 2; in the fiddle
function init() {
var scene = new THREE.Scene();
var box = getBox(1, 1, 1);
scene.add(box);
var camera = new THREE.Camera(45, window.innerWidth/window.innerHeight, 1, 1000 );
//camera.position.z = 2;
var renderer = new THREE.WebGLRenderer();
renderer.setSize(window.innerWidth, window.innerHeight);
document.getElementById("webgl").appendChild(renderer.domElement);
renderer.render(scene, camera);
}
function getBox(w, h, d) {
var geometry = new THREE.BoxGeometry(w, h, d);
var material = new THREE.MeshBasicMaterial({
color : 0x00ff00
});
var mesh = new THREE.Mesh(geometry, material);
return mesh;
}
init();
not sure if you're trying to create this scene with an orthographic camera or perspective camera, but you'll typically need to specify the camera by type (ie THREE.PerspectiveCamera(...)).
I also added a few extra lines to ensure the camera was configured correctly, namely, setting the "LookAt" point to (0,0,0) , as well as setting an actual position of the camera via the THREE.Vector3.set(...) method.
Here are my adjustments to your code:
function init() {
var scene = new THREE.Scene();
var box = getBox(1, 1, 1);
scene.add(box);
var camera = new THREE.PerspectiveCamera(70,
window.innerWidth/window.innerHeight, 0.1, 1000 ); // Specify camera type like this
camera.position.set(0,2.5,2.5); // Set position like this
camera.lookAt(new THREE.Vector3(0,0,0)); // Set look at coordinate like this
var renderer = new THREE.WebGLRenderer();
renderer.setSize(window.innerWidth, window.innerHeight);
document.getElementById("webgl").appendChild(renderer.domElement);
renderer.render(scene, camera);
}
function getBox(w, h, d) {
var geometry = new THREE.BoxGeometry(w, h, d);
var material = new THREE.MeshBasicMaterial({
color : 0x00ff00
});
var mesh = new THREE.Mesh(geometry, material);
return mesh;
}
init();
Try
camera.position.set( <X> , <Y> , <Z> );
where <X> and <Z> are 2D coordinates and <Y> is height

rotate sphere in three.js so that mapped image of globe matches GeoJSON that is also shown in three.js

I have created a globe in three.js and am using an image mapped to the sphere.
On top of this, I'm using the ThreeGeoJSON library to render geojson data.
However the geographies don't match up.
I need to rotate the globe with the mapped image so that they align, but I can't figure out how to do so. I tried setting a quaternion variable and rotating based on that, but can't get it working. Any help or pointers would be very much appreciated.
Here you can see a working version of what I've done so far:
http://bl.ocks.org/jhubley/8450d7b0df0a4a9fd8ce52d1775515d5
All of the code, images, data here:
https://gist.github.com/jhubley/8450d7b0df0a4a9fd8ce52d1775515d5
I've also pasted the index.html below.
<html>
<head>
<title>ThreeGeoJSON</title>
<script src="threeGeoJSON.js"></script>
<!-- Three.js library, movement controls, and jquery for the geojson-->
<script src="three.min.js"></script>
<script src="TrackballControls.js"></script>
<script src="jquery-1.10.2.min.js"></script>
</head>
<body>
<script type="text/JavaScript">
var width = window.innerWidth,
height = window.innerHeight;
// Earth params
var radius = 9.99,
segments = 32,
rotation = 0 ;
//New scene and camera
var scene = new THREE.Scene();
var camera = new THREE.PerspectiveCamera(55, width / height, 0.01, 1000);
camera.position.z = 1;
camera.position.x = -.2;
camera.position.y = .5;
//New Renderer
var renderer = new THREE.WebGLRenderer();
renderer.setSize(width, height);
document.body.appendChild(renderer.domElement);
//Add lighting
scene.add(new THREE.AmbientLight(0x333333));
var light = new THREE.DirectionalLight(0xe4eef9, .7);
light.position.set(12,12,8);
scene.add(light);
var quaternion = new THREE.Quaternion();
quaternion.setFromAxisAngle( new THREE.Vector3( 0, 1, 0 ), Math.PI / 2 );
var sphere = createSphere(radius, segments);
//sphere.rotation.y = rotation;
sphere.rotation = new THREE.Euler().setFromQuaternion( quaternion );
scene.add(sphere)
//Create a sphere to make visualization easier.
var geometry = new THREE.SphereGeometry(10, 32, 32);
var material = new THREE.MeshPhongMaterial({
//wireframe: true,
//transparent: true
});
function createSphere(radius, segments) {
return new THREE.Mesh(
new THREE.SphereGeometry(radius, segments, segments),
new THREE.MeshPhongMaterial({
map: THREE.ImageUtils.loadTexture('relief.jpg'),
bumpMap: THREE.ImageUtils.loadTexture('elev_bump_4k.jpg'),
bumpScale: 0.005,
specularMap: THREE.ImageUtils.loadTexture('wateretopo.png'),
specular: new THREE.Color('grey')
})
);
}
var clouds = createClouds(radius, segments);
clouds.rotation.y = rotation;
scene.add(clouds)
function createClouds(radius, segments) {
return new THREE.Mesh(
new THREE.SphereGeometry(radius + .003, segments, segments),
new THREE.MeshPhongMaterial({
map: THREE.ImageUtils.loadTexture('n_amer_clouds.png'),
transparent: true
})
);
}
//Draw the GeoJSON
var test_json = $.getJSON("countries_states.geojson", function(data) {
drawThreeGeo(data, 10, 'sphere', {
color: 'red'
})
});
//Draw the GeoJSON loggerhead data
var test_json = $.getJSON("loggerhead-distro-cec-any.json", function(data) {
drawThreeGeo(data, 10, 'sphere', {
color: 'blue'
})
});
//Set the camera position
camera.position.z = 30;
//Enable controls
var controls = new THREE.TrackballControls(camera);
//Render the image
function render() {
controls.update();
requestAnimationFrame(render);
renderer.render(scene, camera);
}
render();
</script>
</body>
</html>
Instead of ancient r66, I used r81 (just replaced three.min.js). I modified your createSphere() function a bit, and seems it's working.
function createSphere(radius, segments) {
var sphGeom = new THREE.SphereGeometry(radius, segments, segments);
sphGeom.rotateY(THREE.Math.degToRad(-90));
return new THREE.Mesh(
sphGeom,
new THREE.MeshPhongMaterial({
map: new THREE.TextureLoader().load('relief.jpg'),
bumpMap: new THREE.TextureLoader().load('elev_bump_4k.jpg'),
bumpScale: 0.005,
specularMap: new THREE.TextureLoader().load('wateretopo.png'),
specular: new THREE.Color('grey')
})
);
}
The only thing I did was to rotate the sphere's geometry around Y-axis at -90 degrees. The result is here

Incrementally display three.js TubeGeometry

I am able to display a THREE.TubeGeometry figure as follows
Code below, link to jsbin
<html>
<body>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/three.js/r75/three.js"></script>
<script>
// global variables
var renderer;
var scene;
var camera;
var geometry;
var control;
var count = 0;
var animationTracker;
init();
drawSpline();
function init()
{
// create a scene, that will hold all our elements such as objects, cameras and lights.
scene = new THREE.Scene();
// create a camera, which defines where we're looking at.
camera = new THREE.PerspectiveCamera(45, window.innerWidth / window.innerHeight, 0.1, 1000);
// create a render, sets the background color and the size
renderer = new THREE.WebGLRenderer();
renderer.setClearColor('lightgray', 1.0);
renderer.setSize(window.innerWidth, window.innerHeight);
// position and point the camera to the center of the scene
camera.position.x = 0;
camera.position.y = 40;
camera.position.z = 40;
camera.lookAt(scene.position);
// add the output of the renderer to the html element
document.body.appendChild(renderer.domElement);
}
function drawSpline(numPoints)
{
var numPoints = 100;
// var start = new THREE.Vector3(-5, 0, 20);
var start = new THREE.Vector3(-5, 0, 20);
var middle = new THREE.Vector3(0, 35, 0);
var end = new THREE.Vector3(5, 0, -20);
var curveQuad = new THREE.QuadraticBezierCurve3(start, middle, end);
var tube = new THREE.TubeGeometry(curveQuad, numPoints, 0.5, 20, false);
var mesh = new THREE.Mesh(tube, new THREE.MeshNormalMaterial({
opacity: 0.9,
transparent: true
}));
scene.add(mesh);
renderer.render(scene, camera);
}
</script>
</body>
</html>
However, I would like to display incrementally, as in, like an arc that is loading, such that it starts as the start point, draws incrementally and finally looks the below arc upon completion.
I have been putting in some effort, and was able to do this by storing all the points/coordinates covered by the arc, and drawing lines between the consecutive coordinates, such that I get the 'arc loading incrementally' feel. However, is there a better way to achieve this? This is the link to jsbin
Adding the code here as well
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<title>Incremental Spline Curve</title>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/three.js/r75/three.js"></script>
<style>
body {
margin: 0;
overflow: hidden;
}
</style>
</head>
<script>
// global variables
var renderer;
var scene;
var camera;
var splineGeometry;
var control;
var count = 0;
var animationTracker;
// var sphereCamera;
var sphere;
var light;
function init() {
// create a scene, that will hold all our elements such as objects, cameras and lights.
scene = new THREE.Scene();
// create a camera, which defines where we're looking at.
camera = new THREE.PerspectiveCamera(45, window.innerWidth / window.innerHeight, 0.1, 1000);
// create a render, sets the background color and the size
renderer = new THREE.WebGLRenderer();
// renderer.setClearColor(0x000000, 1.0);
renderer.setClearColor( 0xffffff, 1 );
renderer.setSize(window.innerWidth, window.innerHeight);
// position and point the camera to the center of the scene
camera.position.x = 0;
camera.position.y = 40;
camera.position.z = 40;
camera.lookAt(scene.position);
// add the output of the renderer to the html element
document.body.appendChild(renderer.domElement);
// //init for sphere
// sphereCamera = new THREE.PerspectiveCamera(45, window.innerWidth / window.innerHeight, 1, 1000);
// sphereCamera.position.y = -400;
// sphereCamera.position.z = 400;
// sphereCamera.rotation.x = .70;
sphere = new THREE.Mesh(new THREE.SphereGeometry(0.8,31,31), new THREE.MeshLambertMaterial({
color: 'yellow',
}));
light = new THREE.DirectionalLight('white', 1);
// light.position.set(0,-400,400).normalize();
light.position.set(0,10,10).normalize();
//get points covered by Spline
getSplineData();
}
//save points in geometry.vertices
function getSplineData() {
var curve = new THREE.CubicBezierCurve3(
new THREE.Vector3( -5, 0, 10 ),
new THREE.Vector3(0, 20, 0 ),
new THREE.Vector3(0, 20, 0 ),
new THREE.Vector3( 2, 0, -25 )
);
splineGeometry = new THREE.Geometry();
splineGeometry.vertices = curve.getPoints( 50 );
animate();
}
//scheduler loop
function animate() {
if(count == 50)
{
cancelAnimationFrame(animationTracker);
return;
}
//add line to the scene
drawLine();
renderer.render(scene, camera);
// renderer.render(scene, sphereCamera);
count += 1;
// camera.position.z -= 0.25;
// camera.position.y -= 0.25;
animationTracker = requestAnimationFrame(animate);
}
function drawLine() {
var lineGeometry = new THREE.Geometry();
var lineMaterial = new THREE.LineBasicMaterial({
color: 0x0000ff
});
console.log(splineGeometry.vertices[count]);
console.log(splineGeometry.vertices[count+1]);
lineGeometry.vertices.push(
splineGeometry.vertices[count],
splineGeometry.vertices[count+1]
);
var line = new THREE.Line( lineGeometry, lineMaterial );
scene.add( line );
}
// calls the init function when the window is done loading.
window.onload = init;
</script>
<body>
</body>
</html>
Drawback : The drawback of doing it the above way is that, end of the day, I'm drawing a line between consecutive points, and so I lose out on a lot of the effects possible in TubeGeometry such as, thickness, transparency etc.
Please suggest me an alternative way to get a smooth incremental load for the TubeGeometry.
THREE.TubeGeometry returns a THREE.BufferGeometry.
With THREE.BufferGeometry, you have access to a property drawRange that you can set to animate the drawing of the mesh:
let nEnd = 0, nMax, nStep = 90; // 30 faces * 3 vertices/face
...
const geometry = new THREE.TubeGeometry( path, pathSegments, tubeRadius, radiusSegments, closed );
nMax = geometry.attributes.position.count;
...
function animate() {
requestAnimationFrame( animate );
nEnd = ( nEnd + nStep ) % nMax;
mesh.geometry.setDrawRange( 0, nEnd );
renderer.render( scene, camera );
}
EDIT: For another approach, see this SO answer.
three.js r.144
Normally you would be able to use the method .getPointAt() to "get a vector for point at relative position in curve according to arc length" to get a point at a certain percentage of the length of the curve.
So normally if you want to draw 70% of the curve and a full curve is drawn in 100 segments. Then you could do:
var percentage = 70;
var curvePath = new THREE.CurvePath();
var end, start = curveQuad.getPointAt( 0 );
for(var i = 1; i < percentage; i++){
end = curveQuad.getPointAt( percentage / 100 );
lineCurve = new THREE.LineCurve( start, end );
curvePath.add( lineCurve );
start = end;
}
But I think this is not working for your curveQuad since the getPointAt method is not implemented for this type. A work around is to get a 100 points for your curve in an array like this:
points = curve.getPoints(100);
And then you can do almost the same:
var percentage = 70;
var curvePath = new THREE.CurvePath();
var end, start = points[ 0 ];
for(var i = 1; i < percentage; i++){
end = points[ percentage ]
lineCurve = new THREE.LineCurve( start, end );
curvePath.add( lineCurve );
start = end;
}
now your curvePath holds the line segments you want to use for drawing the tube:
// draw the geometry
var radius = 5, radiusSegments = 8, closed = false;
var geometry = new THREE.TubeGeometry(curvePath, percentage, radius, radiusSegments, closed);
Here a fiddle with a demonstration on how to use this dynamically
I'm not really that familiar with three.js. But I think I can be of assistance. I have two solutions for you. Both based on the same principle: build a new TubeGeometry or rebuild the current one, around a new curve.
Solution 1 (Simple):
var CurveSection = THREE.Curve.create(function(base, from, to) {
this.base = base;
this.from = from;
this.to = to;
}, function(t) {
return this.base.getPoint((1 - t) * this.from + t * this.to);
});
You define a new type of curve which just selects a segment out of a given curve. Usage:
var curve = new CurveSection(yourCurve, 0, .76); // Where .76 is your percentage
Now you can build a new tube.
Solution 2 (Mathematics!):
You are using for your arc a quadratic bezier curve, that's awesome! This curve is a parabola. You want just a segment of that parabola and that is again a parabola, just with other bounds.
What we need is a section of the bezier curve. Let's say the curve is defined by A (start), B (direction), C (end). If we want to change the start to a point D and the end to a point F we need the point E that is the direction of the curve in D and F. So the tangents to our parabola in D and F have to intersect in E. So the following code will give us the desired result:
// Calculates the instersection point of Line3 l1 and Line3 l2.
function intersection(l1, l2) {
var A = l1.start;
var P = l2.closestPointToPoint(A);
var Q = l1.closestPointToPoint(P);
var l = P.distanceToSquared(A) / Q.distanceTo(A);
var d = (new THREE.Vector3()).subVectors(Q, A);
return d.multiplyScalar(l / d.length()).add(A);
}
// Calculate the tangentVector of the bezier-curve
function tangentQuadraticBezier(bezier, t) {
var s = bezier.v0,
m = bezier.v1,
e = bezier.v2;
return new THREE.Vector3(
THREE.CurveUtils.tangentQuadraticBezier(t, s.x, m.x, e.x),
THREE.CurveUtils.tangentQuadraticBezier(t, s.y, m.y, e.y),
THREE.CurveUtils.tangentQuadraticBezier(t, s.z, m.z, e.z)
);
}
// Returns a new QuadraticBezierCurve3 with the new bounds.
function sectionInQuadraticBezier(bezier, from, to) {
var s = bezier.v0,
m = bezier.v1,
e = bezier.v2;
var ns = bezier.getPoint(from),
ne = bezier.getPoint(to);
var nm = intersection(
new THREE.Line3(ns, tangentQuadraticBezier(bezier, from).add(ns)),
new THREE.Line3(ne, tangentQuadraticBezier(bezier, to).add(ne))
);
return new THREE.QuadraticBezierCurve3(ns, nm, ne);
}
This is a very mathematical way, but if you should need the special properties of a Bezier curve, this is the way to go.
Note: The first solution is the simplest. I am not familiar with Three.js so I wouldn't know what the most efficient way to implement the animation is. Three.js doesn't seem to use the special properties of a bezier curve so maybe solution 2 isn't that useful.
I hope you have gotten something useful out of this.

Categories

Resources