Assume you use a library like vue3-datepicker. You realize you need to customize something, and as as first step you want to use a custom fork of it.
The issue is, there is a build step when the package is pushed to npm's registry since the project doesn't use plain JavaScript, but may have vue or typescript files.
In this case, that would be npm run build:component, though that depends on the project.
Just installing the fork from github via:
yarn add <GitHub user name>/<GitHub repository name>#<branch/commit/tag>
hence doesn't suffice as then the ./dist folder doesn't exist.
You'll get really strange errors like:
error: [plugin: vite:dep-scan] Failed to resolve entry for package "vue3-datepicker". The package may have incorrect main/module/exports specified in its package.json: Failed to resolve entry for package "vue3-datepicker". The package may have incorrect main/module/exports specified in its package.json.
As a quick and dirty solution, I removed in my fork the ./dist/ folder from the .gitignore, ran the npm i && npm run build:component in my fork, and pushed it.
Huge downside is, the ./dist/ folder is now part of that repository, after each change in my fork I also have to build the files again and push those as well.
I rather have the build process triggered in my application using my fork. Is there a way from my application to say:
When you install that library, you have to run a certain script once you downloaded all the files?
The solution should be usable for both npm and yarn, in the sense that the fork my be installed by either one in different applications.
A quote from npm-install Docs
If the package being installed contains a prepare script, its dependencies and devDependencies will be installed, and the prepare script will be run, before the package is packaged and installed.
so in your fork's package.json you can add
"scripts": {
// ...
"build:component": "rollup -c build/rollup.config.js",
"prepare": "yarn build:component || npm run build:component"
}
If you want to trigger builds after installation, you can use the postinstall or a build script in your package.json. In this script, you can create directories and do other setups, using shell commands or javascript programs:
{
"scripts": {
"build": "mkdir dist && npm run build:component",
"build:component": "some command"
}
}
I have a bash script which I wrote for publishing modules to npm: publish.sh
As I still work on tweaking this script a lot, every time I change it, I need to make the changes in every copy of it in every npm module I am managing.
Is there a way to include this as a dependency in my package.json file so that I just need to run npm update; npm install in order to update it? Maybe the sh file would need to be executed by some wrapper javascript or something like that..?
"scripts": {
"start": "sh ./scripts/publish.sh",
...
}
If you need access to the script in a single project, you can put it in the "scripts" object in package.json.
"scripts": {
"publish": "/bin/sh publish.sh"
}
The above can be run with npm run publish. See npm run-script docs for more information.
If you literally want to add the shell script as a dependency that can be installed (from the public registry or a private registry) with npm install, you can absolutely do that. Lots of not-JavaScript executable things are available in the npm repository. You'll want to create a package.json for the dependency and specify the location of your shell script with the "bin" entry.
An example package you can look at if you get stuck is notes.sh. The source code is on GitHub. Look at the package.json to see how they specified the scripts to run in the "bin" entry. You'll still need to create a "script" entry in your other project to run the installed shell script (or you can run it as an npm hook) though, unless you're running it manually or spawning a child process in your code or something.
When I add this line to my package.json:
"react": "git://github.com/facebook/react.git#08e4420019f74b7c93e64f59c443970359102530"
...and then run npm install, I find node_modules/react-tools installed when I expect to see node_modules/react.
What am I doing wrong here?
The code at git://github.com/facebook/react.git is not the same code that gets installed when you npm install react. Instead, the code contains a series of build steps that are used to build the npm package. As far as I know, there is not a way to easily use a specific SHA of the React repo as an npm package; you would need to clone the repo, build the project, and copy it somewhere you can require it.
I have an git repo and I'm trying to set it as a dependency in my project.
Using NPM, my package.json looks like this:
"devDependencies": {
"grunt": "~0.4.0",
"grunt-contrib-connect": "~0.2.0",
"grunt-contrib-watch": "~0.3.1",
"custom": "git://github.com/myGitHubRepo/repo.js.git#b7d53a0cfbe496ad89bde6f22324219d098dedb3",
"grunt-contrib-copy": "~0.4.0"
}
On the first
npm install
It install everything and fetches the repository with no problem. But if I change this commit hash to let's say
"custom": "git://github.com/myGitHubRepo/repo.js.git#d6da3a0...", // a different one
It doesn't update! Can anyone point me out how could I get this behavior?
I would simply like to share this code and be able to at some point change this version and the npm would automatically update this.
Ok this is how it is done.
I was also confused.
So i have a private npm module at git#github.com:myModule/MySweetModule.git
I have just published the latest tagged version. Unfortunately i cannot figure out how that works, BUT it works off your master. SOOO your master branch can be your integration branch and you have stage branch for building up the next version. Upon version completion, just merge it into master and increment your private repo's version (so your private repo now went from 1.0.0 to 1.0.1). If you call npm install it will update your repo if the master's package.json version is greater than current working repo. It will always take the latest repo.
That seems like it sucks
I agree. So lets do it a better way! If you tags for your private repo releases you can reference them by "custom": "git+ssh://git#github.com:usr/proj.git#TAG_NAME"
So it i have a tag called 0.1.0, then i would have the url in package.json versioned like so. "custom": "git+ssh://git#github.com:usr/proj.git#0.1.0"
I believe that this is the best approach to your answer. But i am not a gitanista
WARNING
If you try to go back a version, it appears it does not work. so from version 0.2.2 to 0.2.1 it will not update your project. Make sure you do npm remove myProj then npm install if you roll back a version.
manually updating that specific package did the trick for me.
and to do that automatically i added this postinstall script to my package.json
"scripts": {
...
"postinstall": "npm update custom"
}
I encountered this question and all the answers had their own set of issues so I had to find a better means.
I have discovered a newer way to prevent this npm issue with package upgrades on install within the docs (this MAY require newer versions of npm):
Ensure you are tagging versions in your repo.
Then you can include your repo using this slightly modified URL:
git+ssh://git#<repo url>.git#semver:<tag/package version>
This behaves MUCH better and has no issues with downgrading or upgrading the version as I have seen thus far.
Manually updating the package, as suggested by #Nestoro also worked for me:
npm update
npm install <your package name>
I have a downloaded module repo, I want to install it locally, not globally in another directory?
What is an easy way to do this?
you just provide one <folder> argument to npm install, argument should point toward the local folder instead of the package name:
npm install /path
From the npm-link documentation:
In the local module directory:
$ cd ./package-dir
$ npm link
In the directory of the project to use the module:
$ cd ./project-dir
$ npm link package-name
Or in one go using relative paths:
$ cd ./project-dir
$ npm link ../package-dir
This is equivalent to using two commands above under the hood.
Since asked and answered by the same person, I'll add a npm link as an alternative.
from docs:
This is handy for installing your own stuff, so that you can work on it and test it iteratively without having to continually rebuild.
cd ~/projects/node-bloggy # go into the dir of your main project
npm link ../node-redis # link the dir of your dependency
[Edit] As of NPM 2.0, you can declare local dependencies in package.json
"dependencies": {
"bar": "file:../foo/bar"
}
npm pack + package.json
This is what worked for me:
STEP 1: In module project, execute npm pack:
This will build a <package-name>-<version>.tar.gz file.
STEP 2: Move the file to the consumer project
Ideally you can put all such files in a tmp folder in your consumer-project root:
STEP 3: Refer it in your package.json:
"dependencies": {
"my-package": "file:/./tmp/my-package-1.3.3.tar.gz"
}
STEP 4: Install the packages:
npm install or npm i or yarn
Now, your package would be available in your consumer-project's node_modules folder.
Good Luck...
Neither of these approaches (npm link or package.json file dependency) work if the local module has peer dependencies that you only want to install in your project's scope.
For example:
/local/mymodule/package.json:
"name": "mymodule",
"peerDependencies":
{
"foo": "^2.5"
}
/dev/myproject/package.json:
"dependencies":
{
"mymodule": "file:/local/mymodule",
"foo": "^2.5"
}
In this scenario, npm sets up myproject's node_modules/ like this:
/dev/myproject/node_modules/
foo/
mymodule -> /local/mymodule
When node loads mymodule and it does require('foo'), node resolves the mymodule symlink, and then only looks in /local/mymodule/node_modules/ (and its ancestors) for foo, which it doen't find. Instead, we want node to look in /local/myproject/node_modules/, since that's where were running our project from, and where foo is installed.
So, we either need a way to tell node to not resolve this symlink when looking for foo, or we need a way to tell npm to install a copy of mymodule when the file dependency syntax is used in package.json. I haven't found a way to do either, unfortunately :(
Missing the main property?
As previous people have answered npm i --save ../location-of-your-packages-root-directory.
The ../location-of-your-packages-root-directory however must have two things in order for it to work.
package.json in that directory pointed towards
main property in the package.json must be set and working i.g. "main": "src/index.js", if the entry file for ../location-of-your-packages-root-directory is ../location-of-your-packages-root-directory/src/index.js
So I had a lot of problems with all of the solutions mentioned so far...
I have a local package that I want to always reference (rather than npm link) because it won't be used outside of this project (for now) and also won't be uploaded to an npm repository for wide use as of yet.
I also need it to work on Windows AND Unix, so sym-links aren't ideal.
Pointing to the tar.gz result of (npm package) works for the dependent npm package folder, however this causes issues with the npm cache if you want to update the package. It doesn't always pull in the new one from the referenced npm package when you update it, even if you blow away node_modules and re-do your npm-install for your main project.
so.. This is what worked well for me!
Main Project's Package.json File Snippet:
"name": "main-project-name",
"version": "0.0.0",
"scripts": {
"ng": "ng",
...
"preinstall": "cd ../some-npm-package-angular && npm install && npm run build"
},
"private": true,
"dependencies": {
...
"#com/some-npm-package-angular": "file:../some-npm-package-angular/dist",
...
}
This achieves 3 things:
Avoids the common error (at least with angular npm projects) "index.ts is not part of the compilation." - as it points to the built (dist) folder.
Adds a preinstall step to build the referenced npm client package to make sure the dist folder of our dependent package is built.
Avoids issues where referencing a tar.gz file locally may be cached by npm and not updated in the main project without lots of cleaning/troubleshooting/re-building/re-installing.
I hope this is clear, and helps someone out.
The tar.gz approach also sort of works..
npm install (file path) also sort of works.
This was all based off of a generated client from an openapi spec that we wanted to keep in a separate location (rather than using copy-pasta for individual files)
======
UPDATE:
======
There are additional errors with a regular development flow with the above solution, as npm's versioning scheme with local files is absolutely terrible. If your dependent package changes frequently, this whole scheme breaks because npm will cache your last version of the project and then blow up when the SHA hash doesn't match anymore with what was saved in your package-lock.json file, among other issues.
As a result, I recommend using the *.tgz approach with a version update for each change. This works by doing three things.
First:
For your dependent package, use the npm library "ng-packagr". This is automatically added to auto-generated client packages created by the angular-typescript code generator for OpenAPI 3.0.
As a result the project that I'm referencing has a "scripts" section within package.json that looks like this:
"scripts": {
"build": "ng-packagr -p ng-package.json",
"package": "npm install && npm run build && cd dist && npm pack"
},
And the project referencing this other project adds a pre-install step to make sure the dependent project is up to date and rebuilt before building itself:
"scripts": {
"preinstall": "npm run clean && cd ../some-npm-package-angular && npm run package"
},
Second
Reference the built tgz npm package from your main project!
"dependencies": {
"#com/some-npm-package-angular": "file:../some-npm-package-angular/dist/some-npm-package-angular-<packageVersion>.tgz",
...
}
Third
Update the dependent package's version EVERY TIME you update the dependent package. You'll also have to update the version in the main project.
If you do not do this, NPM will choke and use a cached version and explode when the SHA hash doesn't match. NPM versions file-based packages based on the filename changing. It won't check the package itself for an updated version in package.json, and the NPM team stated that they will not fix this, but people keep raising the issue: https://github.com/microsoft/WSL/issues/348
for now, just update the:
"version": "1.0.0-build5",
In the dependent package's package.json file, then update your reference to it in the main project to reference the new filename, ex:
"dependencies": {
"#com/some-npm-package-angular": "file:../some-npm-package-angular/dist/some-npm-package-angular-1.0.0-build5.tgz",
...
}
You get used to it. Just update the two package.json files - version then the ref to the new filename.
Hope that helps someone...
I came across different solution than above while installing custom build package for CKEditor5.
So I uploaded package to app root directory, than:
npm add file:./ckeditor5
In my package.json package is listed as a file:
"ckeditor5-custom-build": "file:ckeditor5",
I think this answer could be relevant to the topic on how to add local package.
For installing local module / package, that not yet on npm or you are developing an npm package and want to test it locally before publishing it. You can try this -
npm i yalc -g
Go to the module/package folder then -
yalc publish
Your packakge is ready to use, now go the project you want to install it -
yalc add <Your package name>
Package will be installed to you project. If you want to remove it -
yalc remove <Your package name>
For more recent versions of npm (I'm using 8.1.3 under macOS Big Sur), the sequence of commands is even easier...
cd /path-where-your-local-project-is/
npm init
This will ask you for some data related to your project and properly initialises your project.json file.
Once that is done, you can install additional modules with:
cd /path-where-your-local-project-is/
npm install --save-dev some-npm-module .
That's all you need!
Note: I believe that the trailing dot is not necessary if you're inside the project directory, but I also think that it doesn't hurt to add it :-)
(I wonder why the official docs still don't explain this...)