I'm working on a Video editing tool, and I need to maintain the 16:9 aspect ratio of the video when resizing the screen horizontally and vertically. So far I got it to work as expected when resizing horizontally, and when resizing down vertically, but can't get it to work when sizing up vertically. The Javascript code I used to calculate the height of the video and resize it is below (notice how the else clause is empty because that's where the code should go):
const calculateHeight = () => {
// Get the other elements on the page
const header = document.querySelector('.main-navigation');
const meshTopBar = document.querySelector('.mesh__top-bar');
const footer = document.querySelector('.mesh__bottom-bar');
// Get the section to apply the window height to it
const mainSection = document.querySelector('.insert-level-container');
// Get the video elements
const editor = document.querySelector('.mesh__insert-editor-container');
const video = document.querySelector('.mesh__insert-editor-video-container');
// Apply the height to the main section by calculating the window height minus the other elements' height
if(mainSection !== null) {
mainSection.style.height = (window.innerHeight - header.offsetHeight - meshTopBar.offsetHeight - footer.offsetHeight) + 'px';
}
// This should be the ideal height for the video
video.style.minHeight = ((video.offsetWidth * 9) / 16) + 'px';
// If the video height is bigger than the section height (calculated above), then resize it
if(video.offsetHeight + 115 > mainSection.offsetHeight) {
video.style.minHeight = video.offsetHeight - 1 + 'px';
editor.style.maxWidth = video.offsetHeight * 16 / 9 + 'px';
} else {
// This is where the logic for the vertical resizing should go
}
}
The relevant CSS for these items is:
.mesh__insert-editor-container {
margin-left: auto;
margin-right: auto;
}
.mesh__insert-editor-video-container {
position: relative;
width: 100%:
}
And the HTML:
<section class="mesh__insert-editor-container flex__one flex-container flex-column horizontally-left-aligned" id="video-main-container">
<div class="mesh__insert-editor-video-container flex-container horizontally-right-aligned flex-wrap">
<video class="mesh__insert-editor-video-placeholder"></video>
</div>
</section>
All this code is:
Get the height of all the elements on the page, sum them and calculate the main section height by subtracting that height;
If the video height gets bigger than the section height, I reduce its height by -1px each time the window gets resized, and calculate the new width.
All the above code is giving me this result, which works great for most scenarios, but I need the video to size up when the condition on the if statement is not met. Everything I tried inside the else statement gets "jumpy".
Any better alternatives to solve this would be much appreciated. Thanks all!
The CSS aspect ratio trick might be a good solution: https://css-tricks.com/aspect-ratio-boxes/
The approach takes advantage of a quirk in CSS where padding based on a percentage value will be relative to the element's width. Create a container using this trick, the important bit is this line:
padding-top: calc(9/16 * 100%);
The value is calculating the correct height based on the aspect ratio you want (9 tall over 16 wide in this case) and generating it relative to the width of the element by multiplying by 100%.
With the container maintaining aspect ratio, just place the content inside an absolute positioned inner div and you should be good. This solution is fully responsive at that point.
* { box-sizing: border-box }
.outer-max-width {
max-width: 960px;
margin: 0 auto;
}
.aspect-ratio-box {
width: 100%;
padding-top: calc(9/16 * 100%);
position: relative;
border: 2px solid red; /* for demo visibility, remove */
}
.aspect-ratio-box-content {
position: absolute;
width: 100%;
top: 0;
left: 0;
border: 2px solid blue; /* for demo visibility, remove */
}
.video-placeholder {
display: block;
width: 100%;
height: auto;
}
<div class="outer-max-width">
<div class="aspect-ratio-box">
<div class="aspect-ratio-box-content">
<img class="video-placeholder" src="https://placeimg.com/640/360/nature" />
</div>
</div>
</div>
Got it to work! I used this amazing CSS-only solution: https://codepen.io/EightArmsHQ/pen/BvNzrm similar to BugsArePeopleToo's suggestion, from eightarmshq:
.content{
position: absolute;
top: 0;
bottom: 0;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
background: #555;
box-shadow: inset 1vh 1vh 10vh 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.5);
display: flex;
box-sizing: border-box;
border: 25px solid #cecece;
}
Related
I'm trying to create a map of button elements that overlay a full-screen image, positioned over all the 'buttons' depicted on the image. When the image resizes, the button elements should resize as well.
I initially used an SVG image map for this, but it had a positioning bug (the link below) that didn't allow for the video player inside the foreignObject to show.
SVG foreignObject and absolute positioning
I figured using absolute positioning, and JS to measure the width of the background image was the best way to go. However, I'm having trouble making it work.
Below is the project, with the white box needing to be positioned over the background image (the entire box, with chocolates, and the screen).
The image is within a div as a background, like so:
export const BackgroundLightsOn = styled.div`
position: absolute;
background: url(${BgLightsOn});
background-position: center center;
background-repeat: no-repeat;
background-size: cover;
height: 100%;
width: 100%;
border: 1px solid red;
`
Unfortunately, getting the dimensions of this DOM element gets the dimensions of the div, not the image (which is sometimes larger than the viewport). Below is the 'resizing' code, but this connects to backgroundRef (which is the div element the image is the background, not the image itself).
import React, { useEffect, useRef } from 'react';
import {
TruffleTinContainer,
TruffleTinOutside,
} from '../truffle-tin/styledTruffleTin';
export default function TruffleTin({ backgroundRef }) {
const truffleTinRef = useRef();
const initialPos = { x: 150, y: 150 };
const padding = 25;
let truffleBoxWidth = 0;
let truffleBoxHeight = 0;
useEffect(() => {
truffleBoxWidth = truffleTinRef.current.offsetWidth;
truffleBoxHeight = truffleTinRef.current.offsetHeight;
resize();
}, []);
function resize() {
let backgroundDivRect = backgroundRef.current.getBoundingClientRect();
truffleTinRef.current.style.left =
(initialPos.x / truffleBoxWidth) * backgroundDivRect.width -
padding +
'px';
truffleTinRef.current.style.top =
(initialPos.y / truffleBoxHeight) * backgroundDivRect.height -
padding +
'px';
}
useEffect(() => {
window.addEventListener('resize', resize);
return () => window.removeEventListener('resize', resize);
});
return (
<TruffleTinContainer ref={truffleTinRef}>
I'm the truffle tin
</TruffleTinContainer>
);
}
See the GIF below for the issue:
What's the best way to get this div to proportionally match the width of the background image?
(Edit: I changed the 'div with image background' to an img tag, but even then, the getBoundingClientRect shows not the width of the image, but the width of the viewport:
(in other words, even though the image is much wider than the viewport, I'm still getting the viewports dimensions, when what I want is the image's dimensions))
You don't need JS for that. This is achieved with plain CSS, all you need is the button center positions relative to left-top corner of the block. Sample HTML/CSS:
<div class='wrapper'> <!-- Will need this later -->
<div class='container'>
<a class='button' style='--left: 25%; --top: 20%'>1</a>
<a class='button' style='--left: 35%; --top: 80%'>2</a>
</div>
</div>
.container{
position: relative;
background: url('/path/to/image');
background-size: 100% auto;
}
.button{
position: absolute;
left: var(--left);
top: var(--top);
transform: translate(-50%, -50%); /* Move button a bit so its center matches the actual position */
/* These are just for visualization */
width: 50px;
height: 50px;
border-radius: 100%;
background: pink;
display: flex; align-items: center; justify-content: center;
}
The next step is to make .container have a constant width, or at least a constant width/height ratio if you care about vertical resizing. The constant width is achieved with a simple min-width. To avoid horizontal scroll we will add a .wrapper to hide the cut-off sides:
.wrapper{
display: flex;
align-items: center;
max-width: 100%;
overflow: hidden;
}
/* A-and a min-width for .container */
.container{
min-width: 1200px; /* Or whatever */
}
If you need a fixed ratio:
.container::before{
content: '';
display: block;
padding-top: 56.25%; /* 56.25% of the parent width this is, ratio 16x9 */
}
min-width can still be applied if needed. There's an aspect-ratio CSS property that can be used instead of that pseudo-element hack, but it is supported only in relatively fresh browser versions; still might be used if you don't plan supporting a little outdated browsers.
I'm making a portfolio website and I am trying to make a simple image browser. I have a container div with size relative to the size of the browser window. I want that div to be able to contain images of different aspect ratios and a caption of fixed height and the width relative to the width of the image. I don't want the div to stretch to contain the images, I want to resize the image (you can see what I mean in the picture below).
illustration of the problem here
I was trying to use javascript to calculate the size of the image, but failed, because I couldn't calculate the element's size before it is actually loaded. This is how I tried to do it (not thinking about the titlebar):
var divAspectRatio = containerDiv.offsetHeight/containerDiv.offsetWidth;
var imageAspectRatio = image.offsetHeight/image.offsetWidth;
if(divAspectRatio>imageAspectRatio){
image.style.height = content_in.offsetHeight;
}else{
image.style.width = content_in.offsetWidth;
}
captionDiv.style.width = image.offsetWidth;
How do I make it work?
If your background image is in a div element, add this to your css, inside the div block:
background-size: cover;
If it's in an img element, add this to your css, inside the img block:
object-fit: cover;
Try using this css element:
object-fit: cover
This way, your image will get resized to fit the containing box!
The desired layout needs some calculation as the placing of an image that has aspect ratio bigger than the aspect ratio of the container differs from one that doesn't. Also to note is that the caption area is required to be only as wide as the displayed image but has a fixed height.
The imgs are wrapped in an 'innerdiv' which will also contain the caption. On loading the image's aspect ratio is found and stored as a CSS variable. Other CSS variables are set up in advance - see the head of this snippet for those that can be chosen. Remaining calculations are done in CSS.
window.onload = function () {
const imgs = document.querySelectorAll('.container .innerdiv .img');
imgs.forEach(img => {
img.parentElement.style.setProperty('--imgratio', img.naturalWidth / img.naturalHeight);
img.parentElement.classList.add(( (img.naturalWidth / img.naturalHeight) > getComputedStyle(img).getPropertyValue("--containerratio") ) ? 'wider' : 'thinner');
});
}
* {
padding: 0;
margin: 0;
}
.container {
/* SET THE NEXT 4 VARIABLES TO WHAT YOU REQUIRE */
--unit: 1vmin; /* the basic unit - must be fixed e.g. vmin, px, ch not % */
--containerw: 40; /* width of a container in these units */
--containerratio: 1.5; /* the ratio of width to height */
--captionh: 4vmin; /* height of a caption including its units (which must be fixed e.g. vmin, px, em */
--containerh: calc(var(--containerw) / var(--containerratio));
display: inline-block;
width: calc(var(--containerw) * var(--unit));
height: calc(var(--containerh) * var(--unit));
position: relative;
border: solid;
}
.innerdiv {
display: inline-block;
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 0;
}
.innerdiv.thinner {
width: calc(var(--imgratio) * ((var(--containerh) * var(--unit)) - var(--captionh)));
height: 100%;
left: 50%;
transform: translateX(-50%);
}
.innerdiv.wider {
width: 100%;
height: calc((var(--containerw) / var(--imgratio)) * var(--unit) + var(--captionh));
top: 50%;
transform: translateY(-50%);
}
.img {
width: 100%;
height: auto;
}
.caption {
font-size: 2vmin;
background-color: yellow;
text-align: center;
width: 100%;
height: var(--captionh);
position: absolute;
top: calc(100% - var(--captionh));
left: 0;
}
<div class="container">
<div class="innerdiv">
<img class="img" src="https://picsum.photos/id/1016/200/300">
<div class="caption">CAPTION</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="container">
<div class="innerdiv">
<img class="img" src="https://picsum.photos/id/1016/500/200">
<div class="caption">CAPTION</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="container">
<div class="innerdiv">
<img class="img" src="https://picsum.photos/id/1016/300/300">
<div class="caption">CAPTION</div>
</div>
</div>
I am trying to create a tooltip element that has a min width of 50px and a max width of 200px. I place the tooltip element inside another element so that I can easily control when the tooltip appears or disappears when there is a hover event on the parent.
The problem that I have is that the tooltip element's width appears to be controlled by the parent's width even though I specified that the child(tooltip) has an absolute position.
let p = document.getElementById( 'parent' );
let b = true;
setInterval( ()=> {
b = !b;
let w = 10;
if( b ) {
w = 300;
}
p.style.width = `${w}px`
}, 5000 );
#parent {
background-color: cyan;
width: 100px;
height: 25px;
position: relative;
transition: width 2s;
}
#tooltip {
position: absolute;
top: calc( 100% + 5px );
left: 5px;
min-width: 50px;
max-width: 200px;
background-color: yellow;
padding: 5px;
border: 1px solid black;
}
<div id="parent">
<div id="tooltip">
My long tooltip text that wraps to multiple lines as needed.
</div>
</div>
I would like the tooltip (yellow div) to keep it's size at 200px in this example, but we can see that when the parent changes width, the tooltip width also changes. Why?
Is there a way to fix this problem?
Clarification: In this example: https://codepen.io/anon/pen/ePPWER we see that the tooltip text looks nice on one line. I don't want the tooltip's div to change its width when the parent changes width, because it forces the tooltip text to wrap onto 2 lines which is undesirable.
If we check the specification related to the width of absolutely positioned element we can read this:
'width' and 'right' are 'auto' and 'left' is not 'auto', then the width is shrink-to-fit . Then solve for 'right'
So in your case the width of your element is shrink to fit:
Calculation of the shrink-to-fit width is similar to calculating the
width of a table cell using the automatic table layout algorithm.
Roughly: calculate the preferred width by formatting the content
without breaking lines other than where explicit line breaks occur,
and also calculate the preferred minimum width, e.g., by trying all
possible line breaks. CSS 2.1 does not define the exact algorithm.
Thirdly, calculate the available width: this is found by solving for
'width' after setting 'left' (in case 1) or 'right' (in case 3) to 0.
Then the shrink-to-fit width is: min(max(preferred minimum width,
available width), preferred width).
To make it easy, and without considering the min/max-width, the width of your element will try to fit the content without exceding the width of its parent container (containing block). By adding min/max-width you simply add more constraint.
One idea of fix it to remove positon:relative from the parent element so that it's no more the containing block of the position:absolute element (it will be the initial containing block which is wide enough to avoid the available width constraint).
Then use margin instead of top/left to control the position:
let p = document.getElementById( 'parent' );
let b = true;
setInterval( ()=> {
b = !b;
let w = 10;
if( b ) {
w = 300;
}
p.style.width = `${w}px`
}, 5000 );
#parent {
background-color: cyan;
width: 100px;
height: 25px;
transition: width 2s;
}
#tooltip {
position: absolute;
margin-top: 30px;
min-width: 50px;
max-width: 200px;
background-color: yellow;
padding: 5px;
border: 1px solid black;
}
<div id="parent">
<div id="tooltip">
My long tooltip text that wraps to multiple lines as needed.
</div>
</div>
ID Tooltip is being used under Parent. When parent's width changes, it also suggest that tooltip's total width is changed. Since you have used mix-width and max-width it will expand till it reaches max-width. If you want it to be fixed then simple use width.
It is because the .parent has a position: relative. This will keep all children (position: absolute included) as confined by the parent div.
Not sure if this will work for you because it is pulling the tooltip out of the parent and making it's own with span wrapping the text. Alternatively, you'll need to change the parent from being relative otherwise it'll continually affect the child.
let p = document.getElementById('parent');
let b = true;
setInterval(() => {
b = !b;
let w = 10;
if (b) {
w = 300;
}
p.style.width = `${w}px`
}, 5000);
#parent {
background-color: cyan;
width: 100px;
height: 25px;
transition: width 2s;
position: relative;
}
#root {
position: relative;
}
#tooltip {
width: 100%;
}
#tooltip span {
position: absolute;
top: calc( 100% + 5px);
left: 5px;
min-width: 50px;
max-width: 200px;
background-color: yellow;
padding: 5px;
border: 1px solid black;
}
<div id="root">
<div id="parent"></div>
<div id="tooltip">
<span>My long tooltip text that wraps to multiple lines as needed.</span>
</div>
</div>
I need to maintain the width of an element as a percentage of its height. So as the height changes, the width is updated.
The opposite is achievable by using a % value for padding-top, but padding-left as a percentage will be a percentage of the width of an object, not its height.
So with markup like this:
<div class="box">
<div class="inner"></div>
</div>
I'd like to use something like this:
.box {
position: absolute;
margin-top: 50%;
bottom: 0;
}
.inner {
padding-left: 200%;
}
To ensure the box's aspect ratio is maintained according to it's height. The height is fluid because of it's % margin - as the window's height changes, the box's height will too.
I know how to achieve this with JavaScript, just wondering if there's a clean CSS-only solution?
You can use an image that has the desired proportions as to help with proportional sizing (images can be scaled proportionally by setting one dimension to some value and other to auto). The image does not have to be visible, but it must occupy space.
.box {
position: absolute;
bottom: 0;
left: 0;
height: 50%;
}
.size-helper {
display: block;
width: auto;
height: 100%;
}
.inner {
position: absolute;
top: 0;
bottom: 0;
left: 0;
right: 0;
background: rgba(255, 255, 153, .8);
}
<div class="box">
<img class="size-helper" src="//dummyimage.com/200x100/999/000" width="200" height="100">
<div class="inner">
1. box has fluid height<br>
2. img has 2:1 aspect ratio, 100% height, auto width, static position<br>
2.1 it thus maintains width = 200% of height<br>
2.2 it defines the dimensions of the box<br>
3. inner expands as much as box
</div>
</div>
In the above example, box, inner and helper are all same size.
You can use vh units for both height and width of your element so they both change according to the viewport height.
vh
1/100th of the height of the viewport. (MDN)
DEMO
.box {
position: absolute;
height:50vh;
width:100vh;
bottom: 0;
background:teal;
}
<div class="box"></div>
There is another, more efficient way to achieve constant aspect ratio according to height.
You can place an empty svg so you dont have to load an external image.
HTML code:
<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"
height="100"
width="200"
class='placeholder-svg'
/>
CSS code:
.placeholder-svg {
width: auto;
height: 100%;
}
Change width/height to achieve desired aspect ratio.
Keep in mind, the svg might overflow.
http://www.w3.org/2000/svg is just a namespace. It doesn't load anything.
If you change placeholder-svg class to:
.placeholder-svg {
width: 100%;
height: auto;
}
then height is adjusted according to width.
Demo 1 Width is adjusted according to height and 2:1 aspect ratio.
Demo 2 same as above, but you can resize easily (uses React)
The CSS trick you wrote, works pretty well to keep ratio width / height on an element.
It is based on the padding property that, when its value is in percent, is proportional to parent width, even for padding-top and padding-bottom.
There is no CSS property that could set an horizontal sizing proportionally to the parent height.
So I think there is no clean CSS solution.
As of 2021 there is a property called aspect-ratio.
Most browsers support it
div {
border: 1px solid;
margin: 8px;
}
.box {
width: 100px;
min-height: 100px;
resize: horizontal;
overflow: auto;
}
.inner1 {
aspect-ratio: 1/1;
}
.inner2 {
aspect-ratio: 3/1;
}
<div class="box">
<div class="inner1"></div>
<div class="inner2"></div>
</div>
Run this snippet and resize the outer div manually to see the inner divs behavior
I can't find a pure CSS solution. Here's a solution using CSS Element Queries JavaScript library.
var aspectRatio = 16/9;
var element = document.querySelector('.center');
function update() {
element.style.width = (element.clientHeight * aspectRatio) + 'px';
}
new ResizeSensor(element, update);
update();
CodePen demo!
How can I scale a div to fit inside the browser view port but preserve the aspect ratio of the div. How can I do this using CSS and/or JQuery?
Thanks!
You don't need javascript for this. You can use pure CSS.
A padding-top percentage is interpreted relative to the containing block width. Combine it with position: absolute on a child element, and you can put pretty much anything in a box that retains its aspect ratio.
HTML:
<div class="aspectwrapper">
<div class="content">
</div>
</div>
CSS:
.aspectwrapper {
display: inline-block; /* shrink to fit */
width: 100%; /* whatever width you like */
position: relative; /* so .content can use position: absolute */
}
.aspectwrapper::after {
padding-top: 56.25%; /* percentage of containing block _width_ */
display: block;
content: '';
}
.content {
position: absolute;
top: 0; bottom: 0; right: 0; left: 0; /* follow the parent's edges */
outline: thin dashed green; /* just so you can see the box */
}
The display: inline-block leaves a little extra space below the bottom edge of the .aspectwrapper box, so another element below it won't run flush against it. Using display: block will get rid of it.
Thanks to this post for the tip!
Another approach relies on the fact that browsers respect an image's aspect ratio when you resize only its width or height. (I'll let google generate a 16x9 transparent image for demonstration purposes, but in practice you would use your own static image.)
HTML:
<div class="aspectwrapper">
<img class="aspectspacer" src="http://chart.googleapis.com/chart?cht=p3&chs=160x90" />
<div class="content">
</div>
</div>
CSS:
.aspectwrapper {
width: 100%;
position: relative;
}
.aspectspacer {
width: 100%; /* let the enlarged image height push .aspectwrapper's bottom edge */
}
.content {
position: absolute;
top: 0; bottom: 0; right: 0; left: 0;
outline: thin dashed green;
}
Thanks to Geoff for the tip on how to structure the math and logic. Here's my jQuery implementation, which I'm using to size a lightbox so it fills the window:
var height = originalHeight;
var width = originalWidth;
aspect = width / height;
if($(window).height() < $(window).width()) {
var resizedHeight = $(window).height();
var resizedWidth = resizedHeight * aspect;
}
else { // screen width is smaller than height (mobile, etc)
var resizedWidth = $(window).width();
var resizedHeight = resizedWidth / aspect;
}
This is working well for me right now across laptop and mobile screen sizes.
I have a different pure HTML/CSS approach which does not rely on padding or absolute positioning. Instead it uses em units and relies on the CSS min() function plus a little bit of math.
Imagine that we want a viewport div with 16:9 aspect ratio which always fits the browser window and is centered in the axis with excess space. Here's how we can accomplish that:
HTML
<body>
<div class="viewport">
<p>
This should be a 16:9 viewport that fits the window.
</p>
</div>
</body>
CSS
body {
width: 100vw;
height: 100vh;
margin: 0;
display: flex;
justify-content: center;
align-items: center;
background-color: white;
font-size: min(1vw, 1.778vh);
}
div.viewport {
width: 100em;
height: 56.25em;
background-color: lightblue;
}
div.viewport > p {
font-size: 3em;
text-align: center;
}
You can experiment with this in a sample JSFiddle here.
The secret sauce is in the body font-size. It should be set to min(1vw, Avh), where A is the aspect ratio you want the div to have, i.e. width / height. In the example above we're using 1.778, which is approximately 16 / 9.
In CSS, em units are based on the font-size of the element, which is inherited from parent element if not explicitly set. For your viewport div, set the width to 100em (NOT rem) and the height to Iem, where I is the inverse of the aspect ratio expressed as a percentage, i.e. 100 / A or 100 * height / width. In the example above we're using 56.25, which is 100 * 9 / 16.
One bonus of this approach is that all of your nested elements may also use em units so that they always scale precisely with the size of the viewport. You can see this used on the p element in the example.
Note that as an alternative to the above, you may set the font-size on your html element and use rem units everywhere. CSS rem units are similar to em units but always relative to the root element's font-size.
Javascipt:
//Responsive Scaling
let outer = document.getElementById('outer'),
wrapper = document.getElementById('wrap'),
maxWidth = outer.clientWidth,
maxHeight = outer.clientHeight;
window.addEventListener("resize", resize);
resize();
function resize(){
let scale,
width = window.innerWidth,
height = window.innerHeight,
isMax = width >= maxWidth && height >= maxHeight;
scale = Math.min(width/maxWidth, height/maxHeight);
outer.style.transform = isMax?'':'scale(' + scale + ')';
wrapper.style.width = isMax?'':maxWidth * scale;
wrapper.style.height = isMax?'':maxHeight * scale;
}
HTML:
<div id="wrap">
<div id="outer">
{{ fixed content here }}
</div>
</div>
Styling:
/* Responsive Scaling */
#wrap {
position: relative;
width: 1024px;
height: 590px;
margin: 0 auto;
}
#outer {
position: relative;
width: 1024px;
height: 590px;
transform-origin: 0% 0%;
overflow: hidden;
}
This is possible with JQuery and a bit of maths.
Use JQuery to get the view ports width and height as well as the divs current dimensions.
$(document).width();
Calculate the divs current aspect ratio. eg width/height
You need a bit of logic to determine whether to set the width or height first, then use the initial ratio to calculate the other side.
jQuery has a plugin that grows an object until one of it's sides reaches a certain px-value. Coupling this will the viewport's height, you could expand any element to that size: jQuery MaxSide.