I have an api that return me data in following format:
[
{
"_id": 1567362600000,
"KIDate": "2019-09-02",
"KITools": [
{
"data": 1,
"tool": "A"
},
{
"data": 2,
"tool": "B"
}
]
},
{
"_id": 1567519839316,
"KIDate": "2019-09-01",
"KITools": [
{
"data": 2,
"tool": "A"
},
{
"data": 1,
"tool": "C"
}
]
},
{
"_id": 1567519839317,
"KIDate": "2019-08-31",
"KITools": [
{
"data": 0,
"tool": "C"
}
]
},
]
I want to transform this data to get the following arrays:
Result 1 - [“2019-09-02”,”2019-09-01”,”2019-08-31”]
Result 2 - [ {name: ‘A’, data:[1, 2, 0] }, { name: 'B', data: [2, 0, 0] }, { name: 'C', data: [0, 1, 0]}]
Currently I am able to achieve this by using loops and per-defining variables with the tool name like following and looping the api data to push into this variable.
var result2 = [{
name: 'A',
data: []
}, {
name: 'B',
data: []
}, {
name: 'C',
data: []
}];
But this is not the expected behavior, the tool names can change and I have to figure that out dynamically based on the data returned by the api.
What is the best way to achieve this without looping like crazy.
You could use reduce method to get the result with array of dates and object of values for each tool.
const data = [{"_id":1567362600000,"KIDate":"2019-09-02","KITools":[{"data":1,"tool":"A"},{"data":2,"tool":"B"}]},{"_id":1567519839316,"KIDate":"2019-09-01","KITools":[{"data":2,"tool":"A"},{"data":1,"tool":"C"}]},{"_id":1567519839317,"KIDate":"2019-08-31","KITools":[{"data":0,"tool":"C"}]}]
const result = data.reduce((r, {KIDate, KITools}, i) => {
r.dates.push(KIDate);
KITools.forEach(({data: dt, tool}) => {
if(!r.values[tool]) r.values[tool] = Array(data.length).fill(0);
r.values[tool][i] = dt
})
return r;
}, {dates: [], values: {}})
console.log(result)
You can use reduce and forEach with Set and Map
Initialize accumulator as object with dates and data key, dates is a Set and data is Map
For every element add the KIDate to dates key,
Loop over KITools, check if that particular too exists in data Map if it exists update it's value by adding current values to id, if not set it's value as per current values
let data = [{"_id": 1567362600000,"KIDate": "2019-09-02","KITools": [{"data": 1,"tool": "A"},{"data": 2,"tool": "B"}]},{"_id": 1567519839316,"KIDate": "2019-09-01","KITools": [{"data": 2,"tool": "A"},{"data": 1,"tool": "C"}]},{"_id": 1567519839317,"KIDate": "2019-08-31","KITools": [{"data": 0,"tool": "C"}]},]
let final = data.reduce((op,{KIDate,KITools})=>{
op.dates.add(KIDate)
KITools.forEach(({data,tool})=>{
if(op.data.has(data)){
op.data.get(data).data.push(tool)
} else{
op.data.set(data, {name: data, data:[tool]})
}
})
return op
},{dates:new Set(),data: new Map()})
console.log([...final.dates.values()])
console.log([...final.data.values()])
The result1 array can be obtained via a direct .map(). To build the result2 array will require additional work - one approach would be to do so via .reduce() as detailed below:
const data=[{"_id":1567362600000,"KIDate":"2019-09-02","KITools":[{"data":1,"tool":"A"},{"data":2,"tool":"B"}]},{"_id":1567519839316,"KIDate":"2019-09-01","KITools":[{"data":2,"tool":"A"},{"data":1,"tool":"C"}]},{"_id":1567519839317,"KIDate":"2019-08-31","KITools":[{"data":0,"tool":"C"}]}];
const result1 = data.map(item => item.KIDate);
const result2 = data.reduce((result, item) => {
item.KITools.forEach(kitool => {
/* For current item, search for matching tool on name/tool fields */
let foundTool = result.find(i => i.name === kitool.tool);
if (foundTool) {
/* Add data to data sub array if match found */
foundTool.data.push(kitool.data);
} else {
/* Add new tool if no match found and init name and data array */
result.push({
name: kitool.tool,
data: [kitool.data]
});
}
});
return result;
}, []).map((item, i, arr) => {
/* Second phase of processing here to pad the data arrays with 0 values
if needed */
for (let i = item.data.length; i < arr.length; i++) {
item.data.push(0);
}
return item;
});
console.log('result1:', result1);
console.log('result2:', result2);
Related
I have a dictionary called teamData
var teamData = {
app: {
sortCol:"name",
sortDir:"asc"
},
data: [
{
id: 1,
name:"Raptors",
coachId: 1,
coachFirst: "Ken",
coachLast: "jenson",
coachPhone: "801-333-4444",
coachEmail: "ken.jenson#uvu.edu",
coachLicenseLevel: 1,
league: 1,
division: 1
},
{
id: 2,
name:"Killer Bunnies",
coachId: 2,
coachFirst: "Peter",
coachLast: "Rabbit",
coachPhone: "801-333-4444",
coachEmail: "peter.rabbit#uvu.edu",
coachLicenseLevel: 1,
league: 1,
division: 2
},
{
id: 3,
name:"Thunderbirds",
coachId: 3,
coachFirst: "Harry",
coachLast: "DirtyDog",
coachPhone: "801-333-4444",
coachEmail: "harry.dirty.dog#uvu.edu",
coachLicenseLevel: 2,
league: 1,
division: 2
}
]
}
I'm trying to write a function that takes a key/value object and returns a filtered dictionary. So if the function is
let teams = filter({coachLicenseLevel:1});
then the expected result is to return a filtered dictionary with only two elements that have that key/value pair
Here is the function I have so far, but I'm stuck on how to get the key object.
filter(filterObj) {
const v = Object.values(filterObj);
const k = Object.keys(filterObj);
const res = teamData.filter(({???}) => v.includes(???));
}
any help would be appreciated.
If you want to filter only the data array, you could do something like this:
function filterArrayByParamAndValue(arr, itemParam, value) {
return arr.filter(item => item.itemParam === value)
}
And in your code just replace the data property, if
let teamData = {
....,
data: [...filterArrayByParamAndValue(teamData.data, coachLicenseLevel, 1)],
....
}
Of course you should also add all necessary checks in the filter function, or even add an object property to check for and pass the whole object.
Instead of passing an object, you may consider using the filter function with your custom filter logic. Here is an example for your specific case:
let teams = teamData.data.filter(item => item.coachLicenseLevel == 1)
I have two arrays of objects. Each object within that array has an array of objects.
I'm trying to merge the two arrays with one being used as a master, overwriting any duplicates in both the first level and the second 'option' level. Almost like a union join.
I've tried the code, however this doesn't cater for duplicate in options within a material.
Running this code results in two id: 400 options for the second material. When there should only be 1 with the value of 100cm.
Is there any smart way of doing this please? I also had a look at using sets, but again this only worked on the top level.
const materials_list = [
{
id: 2,
options: [
{
id: 300,
value: '50cm'
},
{
id: 400,
value: '75cm'
}
]
}
]
const master_materials_list = [
{
id: 1,
options: [
{
id: 200,
value: '50cm'
}
]
},
{
id: 2,
options: [
{
id: 400,
value: '100cm'
}
]
}
]
master_materials_list.forEach(masterMaterial => {
const matchMaterial = materials_list.find(existingMaterial => existingMaterial.id === masterMaterial.id);
if(matchMaterial) {
masterMaterial.options = masterMaterial?.options.concat(matchMaterial.options);
}
});
console.log(master_materials_list);
This is the desired output
[
{
id: 1,
options: [
{
id: 200,
value: '50cm'
}
]
},
{
id: 2,
options: [
{
id: 300,
name: '50cm'
},
{
id: 400,
name: '100cm'
}
]
}
]
Different approach that first makes a Map of the material_list options for o(1) lookup
Then when mapping the master list use filter() to find options stored in the above Map that don't already exist in the master
const materials_list=[{id:2,options:[{id:300,value:"50cm"},{id:400,value:"75cm"}]}, {id:999, options:[]}],
master_materials_list=[{id:1,options:[{id:200,value:"50cm"}]},{id:2,options:[{id:400,value:"100cm"}]}];
// store material list options array in a Map keyed by option id
const listMap = new Map(materials_list.map(o=>[o.id, o]));
// used to track ids found in master list
const masterIDs = new Set()
// map material list and return new objects to prevent mutation of original
const res = master_materials_list.map(({id, options, ...rest})=>{
// track this id
masterIDs.add(id)
// no need to search if the material list Map doesn't have this id
if(listMap.has(id)){
// Set of ids in this options array in master
const opIds = new Set(options.map(({id}) => id));
// filter others in the Map for any that don't already exist
const newOpts = listMap.get(id).options.filter(({id})=> !opIds.has(id));
// and merge them
options = [...options, ...newOpts]
}
// return the new object
return {id, options, ...rest};
});
// add material list items not found in master to results
listMap.forEach((v,k) =>{
if(!masterIDs.has(k)){
res.push({...v})
}
})
console.log(res)
.as-console-wrapper {max-height: 100%!important;top:0}
You can do this with lodash:
const materials_list = [
{
id: 2,
options: [
{
id: 300,
value: '50cm',
},
{
id: 400,
value: '75cm',
},
],
},
];
const master_materials_list = [
{
id: 1,
options: [
{
id: 200,
value: '50cm',
},
],
},
{
id: 2,
options: [
{
id: 400,
value: '100cm',
},
],
},
];
const customizer = (objValue, srcValue, propertyName) => {
if (propertyName === 'options') {
return _(srcValue)
.keyBy('id')
.mergeWith(_.keyBy(objValue, 'id'))
.values()
.value();
}
};
const merged = _(master_materials_list)
.keyBy('id')
.mergeWith(_.keyBy(materials_list, 'id'), customizer)
.values()
.value();
console.log(merged);
<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/lodash#4.17.21/lodash.min.js"></script>
You’re going to have to filter matchMaterials.options before the concat. Something like:
matchMaterial.options = matchMaterial.options.filter(opt =>
masterMaterial.options.find(val => val.Id === opt.Id) == null;
);
This should remove any “duplicate” options from matchMaterial before the concat.
EDIT:
I did this on my phone so I’m sorry if the code is formatted weird like I’m seeing now
I am using Axios to execute a GET request to a public API, I need to combine the names if they are the same and add the values up to only show the top 20 (It's a large dataset) based on the highest to lowest amounts(ascending order).
Axios Response
[
{
name: "foo1",
value: "8123.30"
},
{
name: "foo1",
value: "2852.13"
},
{
name: "foo2",
value: "5132.23"
},
{
name: "foo1",
value: "1224.20"
},
{
name: "foo2",
value: "1285.23"
}
1200...
];
Expected Output
[
{ name: "foo1",
value: "12199.63" // from all combined "foo1" amounts in the dataset
},
{
name: "foo2",
value: "6417.46" // from all combined "foo2" amounts in the dataset
},
18..
]
I tried to do something like this....
const fetchData = () => {
return axios.get(url)
.then((response) => response.data)
};
function onlyWhatINeed() {
const newArr = []
return fetchData().then(data => {
const sortedData = data.sort((a, b) => parseFloat(a.value) - parseFloat(b.value));
// I need to loop through the dataset and add all the "values" up
// returning only the top 20 highest values in an array of those objects
newArr.push(sortedData)
})
}
But I am confused as to how to push this data to a new array of the sorted data (top 20 values in ascending order) and use this data in my web application. I am a bit new to creating REST APIs so if you could provide articles and/or resources so I can understand a little more that would be an awesome bonus!
You can combine the entries that share the same name using a map, then sort the map and keep the first twenty elements :
function onlyWhatINeed() {
const newArr = []
return fetchData().then(data => {
let map = new Map();
data.forEach(d => {
if(!map.has(d.name)) {
map.set(d.name, parseFloat(d.value));
} else {
map.set(d.name, map.get(d.name) + parseFloat(d.value));
}
})
return Array.from(map.entries()).sort((a, b) => a.value - b.value).slice(0, 20);
})
}
Since you're dealing with a large dataset, I recommend that you handle this server side instead of offloading the sorting to your clients.
async function fetchData(){
const { data } = await axios.get(url);
let newArr = []
data.forEach((e,i) => {
let index = newArr.findIndex(el => el.name === e.name);
if(index !== -1 ) newArr[index].value += parseFloat(e.value); //add to the value if an element is not unique
if(index === -1 ) newArr.push({...e, value: parseFloat(e.value)}); //push to the array if the element is unique and convert value to float
});
return newArr.sort((a,b) => a.value - b.value).slice(0,20);//returns an array of 20 elements after sorting
}
Please do more research on how to work with arrays and objects in general.
If you happen to already be using lodash, then here's a functional-style solution using lodash chaining. Probably not optimal performance, but could be useful for relatively small datasets.
const _ = require('lodash');
const data = [
{
name: "foo1",
value: "8123.30"
},
{
name: "foo1",
value: "2852.13"
},
{
name: "foo2",
value: "5132.23"
},
{
name: "foo1",
value: "1224.20"
},
{
name: "foo2",
value: "1285.23"
},
{
name: "foo3",
value: "1000.00"
},
{
name: "foo3",
value: "2000.00"
}
];
// 1. convert string values to floats
// 2. group by name
// 3. sum values by name
// 4. sort by descending value
// 5. take top 20
const output =
_(data)
.map(obj => ({
name: obj.name,
value: parseFloat(obj.value)
}))
.groupBy('name')
.map((objs, key) => ({
name: key,
value: _.sumBy(objs, 'value')
}))
.orderBy(['value'], 'desc')
.slice(0, 20)
.value();
console.log('output:', output);
How can I get an array with all the unique values based on a property name?
In my case my object looks like this and I want an array with the unique documentID's.
const file = {
invoice: {
invoiceID: 1,
documentID: 5
},
reminders: [
{
reminderID: 1,
documentID: 1
},
{
reminderID: 2,
documentID: 1
}
]
}
The result should be an array [5, 1] //The unique documentID's are 5 and 1
It doesn't seem like possible to add a property name to the Object.values() function.
You can use Set to get unique documentID.
const file = {
invoice: {
invoiceID: 1,
documentID: 5
},
reminders: [
{
reminderID: 1,
documentID: 1
},
{
reminderID: 2,
documentID: 1
}
],
payments: {
documentID : 5
}
};
var keys = Object.keys(file).map(key=>file[key].map ? file[key].map(i=>i.documentID) : file[key].documentID)
var keysFlattened= [].concat.apply([], keys);
var unique = new Set(keysFlattened);
console.log(Array.from(unique));
I use something like this that does what you want I think
const keepUniqueBy = key => (array, item) => {
if (array.find(i => item[key] === i[key])) {
return array;
} else {
return [ ...array, item ];
}
};
Then you can simply: const unique = reminders.reduce(keepUniqueBy('documentID'))
NB: It's probably low performing, but for small arrays it doesn't matter.
See jsfiddle here: https://jsfiddle.net/remenyLx/2/
I have data that contains objects that each have an array of images. I want only the first image of each object.
var data1 = [
{
id: 1,
images: [
{ name: '1a' },
{ name: '1b' }
]
},
{
id: 2,
images: [
{ name: '2a' },
{ name: '2b' }
]
},
{
id: 3
},
{
id: 4,
images: []
}
];
var filtered = [];
var b = data1.forEach((element, index, array) => {
if(element.images && element.images.length)
filtered.push(element.images[0].name);
});
console.log(filtered);
The output needs to be flat:
['1a', '2a']
How can I make this prettier?
I'm not too familiar with JS map, reduce and filter and I think those would make my code more sensible; the forEach feels unnecessary.
First you can filter out elements without proper images property and then map it to new array:
const filtered = data1
.filter(e => e.images && e.images.length)
.map(e => e.images[0].name)
To do this in one loop you can use reduce function:
const filtered = data1.reduce((r, e) => {
if (e.images && e.images.length) {
r.push(e.images[0].name)
}
return r
}, [])
You can use reduce() to return this result.
var data1 = [{
id: 1,
images: [{
name: '1a'
}, {
name: '1b'
}]
}, {
id: 2,
images: [{
name: '2a'
}, {
name: '2b'
}]
}, {
id: 3
}, {
id: 4,
images: []
}];
var result = data1.reduce(function(r, e) {
if (e.hasOwnProperty('images') && e.images.length) r.push(e.images[0].name);
return r;
}, [])
console.log(result);
All answers are creating NEW arrays before projecting the final result : (filter and map creates a new array each) so basically it's creating twice.
Another approach is only to yield expected values :
Using iterator functions
function* foo(g)
{
for (let i = 0; i < g.length; i++)
{
if (g[i]['images'] && g[i]["images"].length)
yield g[i]['images'][0]["name"];
}
}
var iterator = foo(data1) ;
var result = iterator.next();
while (!result.done)
{
console.log(result.value)
result = iterator.next();
}
This will not create any additional array and only return the expected values !
However if you must return an array , rather than to do something with the actual values , then use other solutions suggested here.
https://jsfiddle.net/remenyLx/7/