What's the advantage of creating a TextNode and appending it to an HTML element over setting directly its textContent?
Let's say I have a span.
var span = document.getElementById('my-span');
And I want to change its text. What's the advantage of using :
var my_text = document.createTextNode('Hello!');
span.appendChild(my_text);
over
span.textContent = 'hello';
It 's not really matter of advantage but of proper usage depending on the need.
The fundamental difference is that:
createTextNode() is a method and works just as its name says: it creates an element... then you must do something with it (like in your example, where you append it as a child);
so it is useful if you want to have a new element and place it somewhere
textContent is a property you may get or set, with a unique statement and nothing else;
so it is useful when you only want to change the content of an already existing element
Now in the precise case of your question, you said you want to change the text of the element...
To be more clear say you have the following HTML element:
<span>Original text</span>
If you're using your first solution:
var my_text = document.createTextNode('Hello!');
span.appendChild(my_text);
then it will end with:
<span>Original textHello!</span>
because you appended your textNode.
So you should use the second solution.
Related
I am trying to add some text to an existing element using textContent. But when I use +=(addition assignment) operator but in the result, already existing tags like b has lost its effect. I think I am just adding to it, but it also has effect in the previous content. Can anyone explain why? I checked the docs but didn't find anything about this.
HTML:
<div id="divA">Something<b>bold</b></div>
JS
const some = document.getElementById("divA");
some.textContent += "Hi"; // This results in : "Something boldHi" without the bolded formatting.
some.textContent = some.textContent + "Hi"; //This too results in the same!
Thanks in advance!
The .textContent value of an element returns just that - the text content, which is plain text, not the HTML markup of the contents.
If you do
some.textContent += "Hi"
The text content of the container will be retrieved, which will not contain any tags - eg
<div id="divA">Something<b>bold</b></div>
will retrieve:
Something bold
Concatenating onto that and then assigning the result back to the .textContent of the element results in the element's descendants replaced with a single text node, where the text node's value is the value assigned.
If you use .innerHTML += instead, the prior HTML markup of the descendants will be preserved - but the descendants will all be re-parsed according to the HTML markup assigned, so event listeners and related things that depend on DOM elements will be lost. A better option is to use .insertAdjacentHTML, which does not require re-parsing of the descendants.
An even better option would be to append a node itself instead of trying to write HTML markup (which is potentially unsafe), eg
some.appendChild(document.createTextNode('Hi'))
When you are taking the textContent then you will get Somethingbold which is just plain text wihtout HTML tags
console.log(some.textContent); // Somethingbold
You are appending the textContent, instead you shold use innerHTML
const some = document.getElementById("divA");
some.innerHTML += "Hi"; // This results in : "Something boldHi" without the bolded formatting.
some.innerHTML = some.innerHTML + "Hi"; //This too results in the same!
<div id="divA">Something<b>bold</b></div>
How to set dom's text in pure javascript?
I want to set ul object's text value.
So i tried below.
getElementByID("DropDown").textContent = "text";
But the ul's child is disappeared when i set the textcontent.
It has same result in innerHtml and innerText.
getElementByID("DropDown").innerText= "text";
getElementByID("DropDown").innerHtml= "text";
Then i must appendChild(TextNode) to ul? I think it is too complex.
I must append TextNode and i must save the TextNode's ref.
Is there have any easy way?
innerHTML is just a string. If you overwrite it, it loses its previous content. But, you can append to it instead, and then it does not lose its previous content. See magic1
And magic2 shows the createElement+appendChild way. While it has more lines, it is easier to manage if you want to set various attributes of an element (style, event handlers and others - not necessarily for this particular case of list items, but in general).
var i=0;
function magic1(){
i++;
document.getElementById("myUL").innerHTML+="<li>Testx"+i+"</li>";
}
function magic2(){
i++;
var li=document.createElement("li");
li.innerHTML="Testy"+i;
document.getElementById("myUL").appendChild(li);
}
<button onclick="magic1()">ClickMe1</button>
<button onclick="magic2()">ClickMe2</button>
<ul id="myUL"></ul>
I am writing a small library where I am in need of selecting a relative element to the targeted element through querySelector method.
For example:
HTML
<div class="target"></div>
<div class="relative"></div>
<!-- querySelector will select only this .target element -->
<div class="target"></div>
<div class="relative"></div>
<div class="target"></div>
<div class="relative"></div>
JavaScript
var target = document.querySelectorAll('.target')[1];
// Something like this which doesn't work actually
var relativeElement = target.querySelector('this + .relative');
In the above example, I am trying to select the .relative class element relative only to the .target element whose value is stored in target variable. No styles should apply to the other .relative class elements.
PS: the selectors can vary. So, I can't use JavaScript's predefined methods like previousElementSibling or nextElementSibling.
I don't need solution in jQuery or other JavaScript libraries.
Well it should be ideally:
var relativeElement = target.querySelector('.relative');
But this will actually try to select something inside the target element.
therefore this would only work if your html structure is something like:
<div class="target">
<div class="relative"></div>
</div>
Your best bet would probably in this case be to use nextElementSibling which I understand is difficult for you to use.
You cannot.
If you insist on using the querySelector of the subject element, the answers is there is no way.
The spec and MDN both says clearly that Element.querySelector must return "a descendant of the element on which it is invoked", and the object element you want does not meet this limitation.
You must go up and use other elements, e.g. document.querySelector, if you want to break out.
You can always override Element.prototype.querySelector to do your biddings, including implementing your own CSS engine that select whatever element you want in whatever syntax you want.
I didn't mention this because you will be breaking the assumption of a very important function, easily breaking other libraries and even normal code, or at best slowing them down.
target.querySelector('.relative');
By using querySelector on the target instead of document, you scope the DOM traversal to the target element.
It is not entirely clear from your explanation, but by related i assume you mean descendant?
To get all target elements you can use
document.querySelectorAll('.target')
And then iterate the result
I found a way which will work for my library.
I will replace "this " in the querySelector with a unique custom attribute value. Something like this:
Element.prototype.customQuerySelector = function(selector){
// Adding a custom attribute to refer for selector
this.setAttribute('data-unique-id', '1');
// Replace "this " string with custom attribute's value
// You can also add a unique class name instead of adding custom attribute
selector = selector.replace("this ", '[data-unique-id="1"] ');
// Get the relative element
var relativeElement = document.querySelector(selector);
// After getting the relative element, the added custom attribute is useless
// So, remove it
this.removeAttribute('data-unique-id');
// return the fetched element
return relativeElement;
}
var element = document.querySelectorAll('.target')[1];
var targetElement = element.customQuerySelector('this + .relative');
// Now, do anything with the fetched relative element
targetElement.style.color = "red";
Working Fiddle
what's the different between using:
// assuming using elements/tags 'span' creates an array and want to access its first node
1) var arrayAccess = document.getElementsByTagName('elementName')[0]; // also tried property items()
vs
// assuming I assign an id value to the first span element/tag
// specifically calling a node by using it's id value
2) var idAccess = document.getElementById('idValue');
then if I want to change the text node....when using example 1) it will not work, for example:
arrayAccess.firstChild.nodeValue = 'some text';
or
arrayAccess.innerText/innerHTML/textContent = 'some text';
If I "access" the node through its id value then it seems to work fine....
Why is it that when using array it does not work? I'm new to javascript and the book I'm reading does not provide an answer.
Both are working,
In your first case you need to pass the tag name instead of the element name. Then only it will work.
There might be a case that you trying to set input/form elements using innerHTML. At that moment you need to use .value instead of innerHTML.
InnerHTML should be used for div, span, td and similar elements.
So your html markup example:
<div class="test">test</div>
<div class="test">test1</div>
<span id="test">test2</span>
<button id="abc" onclick="renderEle();">Change Text</button>
Your JS code:
function renderEle() {
var arrayAccess = document.getElementsByTagName('div')[0];
arrayAccess.innerHTML = "changed Text";
var idEle = document.getElementById('test');
idEle.innerHTML = "changed this one as well";
}
Working Fiddle
When you use document.getElementsByTagName('p'), the browser traverses the rendered DOM tree and returns a node list (array) of all elements that have the matching tag.
When you use document.getElementById('something'), the browser traverses the rendered DOM tree and returns a single node matching the ID if it exists (since html ID's are unique).
There are many differences when to use which, but one main factor will be speed (getElementById is much faster since you're only searching for 1 item).
To address your other question, you already have specified that you want the first element in the returned nodeList (index [0]) in your function call:
var arrayAccess = document.getElementsByTagName('elementName')[0];
Therefore, arrayAccess is already set to the first element in the returned query. You should be able to access the text by the following. The same code should work if you used document.getElementById to get the DOM element:
console.log(arrayAccess.textContent);
Here's a fiddle with an example:
http://jsfiddle.net/qoe30w2w/
Hope this helps!
I've searched around using Google and Stack Overflow, but I haven't seemed to find a answer to this. I want to write text inside a <div> element, using JavaScript, and later clear the <div> element, and write more text into it. I am making a simple text adventure game.
This is what I am trying to do:
<DOCTYPE!HTML>
<body>
<div class="gamebox">
<!-- I want to write in this div element -->
</div>
</body>
As a new user to JavaScript, how would I be able to write inside the div element gamebox? Unfortunately, my JavaScript skills are not very good, and it would be nice if you can patiently explain what happens in the code.
You can use querySelector to get a reference to the first element matching any CSS selector. In your case, a class selector:
var div = document.querySelector(".gamebox");
querySelector works on all modern browsers, including IE8. It returns null if it didn't find any matching element. You can also get a list of all matching elements using querySelectorAll:
var list = document.querySelectorAll(".gamebox");
Then you access the elements in that list using 0-based indexes (list[0], list[1], etc.); the length of the list is available from list.length.
Then you can either assign HTML strings to innerHTML:
div.innerHTML = "This is the text, <strong>markup</strong> works too.";
...or you can use createElement or createTextNode and appendChild / insertBefore:
var child = document.createTextNode("I'm text for the div");
div.appendChild(span); // Put the text node in the div
Those functions are found in the DOM. A lot of them are now covered in the HTML5 specification as well (particularly Section 3).
Select a single element with document.querySelector or a collection with document.querySelectorAll.
And then it depends, on what you want to do:
Writing Text into the div or create an Element and append it to the div.
Like mentioned getElementsByClassName is faster. Important to know it when you use this you get returned an array with elements to reach the elment you want you specify its index line [0], [1]
var gameBox = document.getElementsByClassName('gamebox')[0];
Here how you can do it
//returns array with elements
var gameBox = document.getElementsByClassName('gamebox');
//inner HTML (overwrites fsd) this can be used if you direcly want to write in the div
gameBox[0].innerHTML ='<p>the new test</p>';
//Appending when you want to add extra content
//create new element <p>
var newP = document.createElement('p');
//create a new TextNode
var newText = document.createTextNode("i'm a new text");
//append textNode to the new element
newP.appendChild(newText);
//append to the DOM
gameBox[0].appendChild(newP);
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/document.createElement
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/document.getElementsByClassName