I am trying to change the URL request on an already connected socket but I can't figure out how or if it is even possible.
I am working with the WebSocket API and CoinCap.
What I am doing right now is closing the connection and creating a new one with the new parameters.
// Create a new WS connection
const webSocketURL = `wss://ws.coincap.io/prices?assets=${loadedKeys}`
// loadedKeys could be a string of one coin (e.g. bitcoin) or an array
// or an array (e.g. bitcoin,ethereum,monero,litecoin), has to be dynamic.
pricesWs = new WebSocket(webSocketURL);
pricesWs.onopen = function () {
console.log(`conected: ${pricesWs.readyState}`)
}
pricesWs.onmessage = function (msg) {
handleUpdateCB(msg.data);
}
// then when I need to receive different coin prices
// I close the connection and reopen a new one.
anotherFunction() {
pricesWs.close();
pricesWs = new WebSocket(aNewWebSocketURL);
}
I tried sending parameters as messages with send() function without success, I keep receiving the same data, let's say I first connect asking for bitcoin and the I want to receive bitcoin and ethereum I tried this
pricesWs = new WebSocket(`wss://ws.coincap.io/prices?assets=bitcoin);
//then tried
pricesWs.send(bitcoin,ethereum)
this doesn't work, I also tried sending as JSON but I kept getting the same data just for the first query(bitcoin)
UPDATE:
This is the the Git for the app, if you are interested seeing the whole thing together.
Git
UPDATE 2:
I created this pen to make it easier to understand, note that the pen is made on VueJS, but that isn't important. The important part is on line 60 JS panel
Is there any reason why you want to switch the URL?
According to the coin cap documentation, you can request information about multiple crypto currency at once. Is it not an option for you?
Generally you should avoid opening and closing connections to a socket as there is slight latency albeit very insignificant. Leaving the connection open is better since you will be notified if price is changed for any of the currencies you are interested it.
The answer to your original question "Is it possible to change URL for a web socket connection?" is no! You can't change URL however you can create as many connections as you need. In your case you are closing the connection and opening it immediately but in the comments I noticed that you mentioned that it is based on user interaction. You can open connection just for the currencies you care about when user requests it and keep the connection opened until user switches the currency again because at that point you'll probably switch to another currency.
I also agree with #Taylor Spark, you can also just hide the dom for the currencies user don't care and render the ones they are interested in.
Related
I am having some issues trying to connect to a matrix server using the matrix-js-sdk in a react app.
I have provided a simple code example below, and made sure that credentials are valid (login works) and that the environment variable containing the URL for the matrix client is set. I have signed into element in a browser and created two rooms for testing purposes, and was expecting these two rooms would be returned from matrixClient.getRooms(). However, this simply returns an empty array. With some further testing it seems like the asynchronous functions provided for fetching room, member and group ID's only, works as expected.
According to https://matrix.org/docs/guides/usage-of-the-matrix-js-sd these should be valid steps for setting up the matrix-js-sdk, however the sync is never executed either.
const matrixClient = sdk.createClient(
process.env.REACT_APP_MATRIX_CLIENT_URL!
);
await matrixClient.long("m.login.password", credentials);
matrixClient.once('sync', () => {
debugger; // Never hit
}
for (const room of matrixClient.getRooms()) {
debugger; // Never hit
}
I did manage to use the roomId's returned from await matrixClient.roomInitialSync(roomId, limit, callback), however this lead me to another issue where I can't figure out how to decrypt messages, as the events containing the messages sent in the room seems to be of type 'm.room.encrypted' instead of 'm.room.message'.
Does anyone have any good examples of working implementations for the matrix-js-sdk, or any other good resources for properly understanding how to put this all together? I need to be able to load rooms, persons, messages etc. and display these respectively in a ReactJS application.
It turns out I simply forgot to run startClient on the matrix client, resulting in it not fetching any data.
I have an app where I spawn several BrowserWindows, with html forms, and I'd like to collect all the data (in order to save it, to be able to spawn them in the same state at a restart) at a press of a button.
At the moment, the only solution I found to do so, is to have each BrowserWindow do ipcRenderer.send every single time any variable changes (not too hard to do with Vuejs 'watchers'), but this seems demanding and inefficient.
I also thought of doing 'executeJavascript' to each window but that does not allow to capture the return value afaik.
I'd just like to be able to send a message from main when a request for saving is made, and wait for the windows to respond before saving all.
EDIT
I found a slightly better way, it looks like this
app.js
// wait for update reponses
ipc.on('update-response', (evt,args) => {
updates[evt.sender.id] = args;
if(Object.keys(updates).length == BrowserWindow.getAllWindows().length) {
// here I do what I need to save my settings, using what is stored in 'updates'
// ...
// and now reset updates for next time
updates = {}
}
});
// now send the requests for updates
BrowserWindow.getAllWindows().map(w => w.send('update'));
renderer.js
ipcRenderer.on('update', () => {
// collect the data
// var data = ...
ipcRenderer.send('update-response', data);
})
and obviously on the renderer side I am listening to these 'update' messages and sending data with 'udpate-response'.
But it seems a bit complicated and so I am sure there is a simpler way to achieve this using the framework.
EDIT 2
I realized that the above does not always work, because for some reason, the evt.sender.id do not match the ids obtained from BrowserWindows.getAllWindows(). I worked around that by sending ids in the request, and having the responder include it. But this is all so much fine for so very little...
I am developing a chatbot using Dialogflow, I would like to throw a message to user when the chatbot doesn't understand the user input for three times in a row and for the forth time respond with a custom message (not the one of the options declared on the dialogflow interface)
One idea that I have is to make a counter within the input unknown action like this:
var counter = 1;
// The default fallback intent has been matched, try to recover (https://dialogflow.com/docs/intents#fallback_intents)
'input.unknown': () => {
// Use the Actions on Google lib to respond to Google requests; for other requests use JSON
if (requestSource === googleAssistantRequest) {
sendGoogleResponse('I\'m having trouble, can you try that again?'); // Send simple response to user
} else {
if (counter == 3) {
counter = 1;
sendResponse('Custom message');
} else {
counter++;
sendResponse('I\'m having trouble, can you try that again?'); // Send simple response to user
}
}
},
This would work, but idk if this will work for multiple user at the same time, I was thinking to create a storage for storing requests attached by a unique id and have a different counter for each request!
Do you have any better idea of achieving such thing in Dialogflow?
This will not work the way you've designed it. Not quite for the reason you think, but close.
You don't show the rest of your code (that's ok), but the counter variable is probably in a function that gets called each time it processes a message. When that function is finished, the counter variable goes out of scope - it is lost. Having multiple calls at the same time won't really be an issue since each call gets a different scope (I'm glossing over some technical details, but this should be good enough).
One solution is that you could store the variable in a global context - but then you do have the issue of multiple users ending up with the same counter. That is very very bad.
Your solution about keeping a counter in a database, keyed against the user, does make sense. But for this need, it is overkill. It is useful for saving data between conversations, but there are better ways to save information during the same conversation.
The easiest solution would be to use a Dialogflow Context. Contexts let you save state in between calls to your webhook fulfillment during the same conversation and for a specific number of messages received from the user (the lifespan).
In this case, it would be best if you created a context named something like unknown_counter with a lifespan of 1. In the parameters, you might set val to 1.
The lifespan of 1 would mean that you'll only see this context the next time your webhook is called. If they handle it through some other Intent (ie - you understood them), then the context would just vanish after your fulfillment runs.
But if your input.unknown handler is called again, then you would see the context was there and what the value is. If it doesn't meet the threshold, send the context again (with a lifespan of 1 again), but with the value being incremented by 1. If it did meet the threshold - you'd reply with some other answer and close the connection.
By "send the context", I mean that the context would be included as part of the reply. So instead of sending just a string to sendGoogleResponse() or sendResponse() you would send an object that included a speech property and an outputContexts property. Something like this:
var outputContexts = [
{
name: 'unknown_counter',
lifespan: 1,
parameters: {
'val': counterValue,
}
}
];
sendResponse({
speech: "I'm confused. What did you say?",
outputContexts: outputContexts
});
In my source connector, I'm using javascript for my database work due to my requirements and parameters.
The end result is storing the data.
ifxResults = ifxConn.executeCachedQuery(ifxQuery); //var is declared
I need to use these results in the destination transformer.
I have tried channelMap.put("results", ifxResults);.
I get the following error ReferenceError: "channelMap" is not defined.
I have also tried to use return ifxResults but I'm not sure how to access this in the destination transformer.
Do you want to send each row as a separate message through your channel? If so, sounds like you want to use the Database Reader in JavaScript mode. Just return that ResultSet (it's really a CachedRowSet if you use executeCachedQuery like that) and the channel will handle the rest, dispatching an XML representation of each row as discrete messages.
If you want to send all rows in the result set aggregated into a single message, that will be possible with the Database Reader very soon: MIRTH-2337
Mirth Connect 3.5 will be released next week so you can take advantage of it then. But if you can't wait or don't want to upgrade then you can still do this with a JavaScript Reader:
var processor = new org.apache.commons.dbutils.BasicRowProcessor();
var results = new com.mirth.connect.donkey.util.DonkeyElement('<results/>');
while (ifxResults.next()) {
var result = results.addChildElement('result');
for (var entries = processor.toMap(ifxResults).entrySet().iterator(); entries.hasNext();) {
var entry = entries.next();
result.addChildElement(entry.getKey(), java.lang.String.valueOf(entry.getValue()));
}
}
return results.toXml();
I know this question is kind of old, but here's an answer just for the record.
For this answer, I'm assuming that you are using a Source connector type of JavaScript Reader, and that you're trying to use channelMap in the JavaScript Reader Settings editing pane.
The problem is that the channelMap variable isn't available in this part of the channel. It's only available in filters and transformers.
It's possible that what you want can be accomplished by using the globalChannelMap variable, e.g.
globalChannelMap.put("results", ifxResults);
I usually need to do this when I'm processing one record at a time and need to pass some setting to the destination channel. If you do it like I've done in the past, then you would first create a globalChannelMap key/value in the source channel's transformer:
globalchannelMap.put("ProcID","TestValue");
Then go to the Destinations tab and select your destination channel to make sure you're sending it to the destination (I've never tried this for channels with multiple destinations, so I'm not sure if anything different needs to be done).
Destination tab of source channel
Notice that ProcID is now listed in the Destination Mappings box. Click the New button next to the Map Variable box and you'll see Variable 1 appear. Double click on that and put in your mapping key, which in this case is ProcID.
Now go to your destination channel's source transformer. There you would enter the following code:
var SentValue = sourceMap.get("ProcID");
Now SentValue in your destination transformer has whatever was in ProcID when your source channel relinquished control.
I am doing a notification system. When a new post is published, users will be notified immediately by an small notification on the screen.
I am currently using this:
setInterval(function(){
checkForChanges();
}, 2*1000);
function checkForChanges(){
$.post("http://"+ document.domain + "/posts/checkForChanges/",
function(dat){
if(dat>0){
....
/*create notification*/
}
});
}
And i was wondering if this is the correct way to do it or not. Because, this is calling a PHP function every 2 seconds and making a query to the database.
In case there are no new changes, it won't do anything...
Thanks.
Yes, polling is the right way. There's no way to send notifications from a server to a client. The client has to ask for them.
2 seconds might be too often. If you could get away with 10 or more, it might be better, but all depends on the number of users, the complexity (weight) of the checks to perform and the need to be 'near realtime'.
This is also fine.You can do it with websocket also-
http://socketo.me/