I'm using trying to create a multi-level donut chart in d3 version5
This image is drawn by d3 version3. it is working fine in version3. I decided to upgrade d3 to the latest version. now, donut chart is not drawn by d3(also no errors in the console)
D3 version 3 > version 5
Here is the sample dataset I used:
Hint: first value in the array is used storage and second is free storage
{
average: [30.012, 69.988],
minimum: [10, 90],
maximum: [40, 60]
}
Note: Above data is just a sample this is not exact data.
Here is the code I tried:
var width = 300;
var height = 300;
var radius = Math.floor((width / 6) - 2);
var classFn = function(a, b) {
return a === 0 ? classes[b] : 'default';
};
var pie = d3.layout.pie().sort(null);
var arc = d3.svg.arc();
var svg = d3.select(selector).append("svg");
svg.attr("width", width);
svg.attr("height", height);
svg = svg.append("g");
svg.attr("transform", "translate(" + width / 2 + "," + height / 2 + ")");
var gs = svg.selectAll("g").data(d3.values(dataset)).enter().append("g");
var path = gs.selectAll("path");
path = path.data(function(d) {
return pie(d);
});
path.enter().append("path");
path.attr("class", function(d, i, j) {
return classFn(i, j);
})
path.attr("d", function(d, i, j) {
return arc.innerRadius((j === 0 ? 0 : 2) + radius * j).outerRadius(radius * (j + 1))(d);
});
Note: This code is working fine in d3 version3.
2. Update:
I've updated the answer with a better solution. I didn't do this at first, because I didn't grasp you structure. I've updated it to being more D3 idiomatic. Plus it does away with the hack I made in my first update :)
var dataset = {
average: [0, 100],
minimum: [0, 100],
maximum: [0, 100]
}
var width = 300;
var height = 300;
var radius = Math.floor((width / 6) - 2);
var pie = d3.pie().sort(null);
var arc = d3.arc();
var svg = d3.select('body').append("svg");
svg.attr("width", width);
svg.attr("height", height);
svg = svg.append("g");
svg.attr("transform", "translate(" + width / 2 + "," + height / 2 + ")");
var gs = svg.selectAll("g").data(d3.values(dataset)).enter().append("g");
gs.each(function (d, j) {
d3.select(this).selectAll('path')
.data(pie(d)).enter()
.append('path')
.attr("class", function(d, i) {
// return classFn(i);
})
.attr('d', function (d) {
return arc
.innerRadius((j === 0 ? 0 : 2) + radius * j)
.outerRadius(radius * (j + 1))(d);
})
})
The updated code uses the index (here j) that is available when appending the g elements, which corresponds to you original j index. This makes it possible to calculate the radii in the original way.
To achieve this, the arc appending code is wrapped into a .each function that iterates over the g elements, making j available to us.
The class application should work as well, but I've commented it out, as the classFn function doesn't work, since the classes variable is not present.
1. Update:
Besides the original answer, when calculating the arc radii you rely on a j value that is different from D3 v3 and v5. I summise that j is used the index of the d3.values array, so I've cooked up a way to reverse look-up that index based on the input values.
First create a map for reverse mapping data values into their corresponding index:
var dataValueJoinChar = 'ยค'
var datasetValuesToIndex = d3.values(dataset).reduce((acc, curr, i) => {
acc[`0${dataValueJoinChar}${curr[0]}`] = i
acc[`1${dataValueJoinChar}${curr[1]}`] = i
return acc
}, {})
Then change the last part of your code to:
path = path.data(function(d) {
return pie(d);
}).enter().append("path");
path.attr("class", function(d, i, j) {
return classFn(i, j);
})
path.attr("d", function(d, i, j) {
var orgIndex = datasetValuesToIndex[`${i}${dataValueJoinChar}${d.data}`]
return arc
.innerRadius((orgIndex === 0 ? 0 : 2) + radius * orgIndex)
.outerRadius(radius * (orgIndex + 1))(d);
});
It might not be too pretty, but it's a simple adaption of your code that works.
------- Original answer --------
In D3 v5 pie and arc are found at d3.pie and d3.arc respectively. Therefore, try changing:
var pie = d3.layout.pie().sort(null);
var arc = d3.svg.arc();
To this instead:
var pie = d3.pie().sort(null);
var arc = d3.arc();
Pie API reference: https://github.com/d3/d3-shape/blob/v1.3.4/README.md#pie
Arc API reference: https://github.com/d3/d3-shape/blob/v1.3.4/README.md#arc
If you use a bundler to bundle sub-modules, both are part of the d3-shape module. If not they are both available in the full D3 library.
Hope this helps!
Related
I have a tree visualisation in which I am trying to display paths between nodes that represent a distribution with multiple classes. I want to split the path lengthwise into multiple colours to represent the frequency of each distribution.
For example: say we have Class A (red) and Class B (black), that each have a frequency of 50. Then I would like a path that is half red and half black between the nodes. The idea is to represent the relative frequencies of the classes, so the frequencies would be normalised.
My current (naive) attempt is to create a separate path for each class and then use an x-offset. It looks like this.
However, as shown in the image, the lines do not maintain an equal distance for the duration of the path.
The relevant segment of code:
linkGroup.append("path").attr("class", "link")
.attr("d", diagonal)
.style("stroke", "red")
.style("stroke-width", 5)
.attr("transform", function(d) {
return "translate(" + -2.5 + "," + 0.0 + ")"; });
linkGroup.append("path").attr("class", "link")
.attr("d", diagonal)
.style("stroke", "black")
.style("stroke-width", 5)
.attr("transform", function(d) {
return "translate(" + 2.5 + "," + 0.0 + ")"; });
It would be great if anyone has some advice.
Thanks!
A possible solution is to calculate the individual paths and fill with the required color.
Using the library svg-path-properties from geoexamples.com you can calculate properties (x,y,tangent) of a path without creating it first like it is done in this SO answer (this does not calculate the tangent).
The code snippet does it for 2 colors but it can be easy generalized for more.
You specify the colors, percentage and width of the stroke with a dictionary
var duoProp = { color: ["red", "black"], percent: 0.30, width: 15 };
percent is the amount color[0] takes from the stroke width.
var duoPath = pathPoints("M30,30C160,30 150,90 250,90S350,210 250,210", 10, duoProp);
duoPath.forEach( (d, i) => {
svg.append("path")
.attr("d", d)
.attr("fill", duoProp.color[i])
.attr("stroke", "none");
});
The pathPoints parameters
path that needs to be stroked, can be generated by d3.line path example from SO answer
var lineGenerator = d3.line().x(d=>d[0]).y(d=>d[1]).curve(d3.curveNatural);
var curvePoints = [[0,0],[0,10],[20,30]];
var duoPath = pathPoints(lineGenerator(curvePoints), 10, duoProp);
path length interval at which to sample (unit pixels). Every 10 pixels gives a good approximation
dictionary with the percent and width of the stroke
It returns an array with the paths to be filled, 1 for each color.
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en">
<head>
<meta charset="UTF-8">
<title>Document</title>
<script src="https://d3js.org/d3.v5.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://unpkg.com/svg-path-properties#0.4.4/build/path-properties.min.js"></script>
</head>
<body>
<svg id="chart" width="350" height="350"></svg>
<script>
var svg = d3.select("#chart");
function pathPoints(path, stepLength, duoProp) {
var props = spp.svgPathProperties(path);
var length = props.getTotalLength();
var tList = d3.range(0, length, stepLength);
tList.push(length);
var tProps = tList.map(d => props.getPropertiesAtLength(d));
var pFactor = percent => (percent - 0.5) * duoProp.width;
tProps.forEach(p => {
p.x0 = p.x - pFactor(0) * p.tangentY;
p.y0 = p.y + pFactor(0) * p.tangentX;
p.xP = p.x - pFactor(duoProp.percent) * p.tangentY;
p.yP = p.y + pFactor(duoProp.percent) * p.tangentX;
p.x1 = p.x - pFactor(1) * p.tangentY;
p.y1 = p.y + pFactor(1) * p.tangentX;
});
var format1d = d3.format(".1f");
var createPath = (forward, backward) => {
var fp = tProps.map(p => forward(p));
var bp = tProps.map(p => backward(p));
bp.reverse();
return 'M' + fp.concat(bp).map(p => `${format1d(p[0])},${format1d(p[1])}`).join(' ') + 'z';
}
return [createPath(p => [p.x0, p.y0], p => [p.xP, p.yP]), createPath(p => [p.xP, p.yP], p => [p.x1, p.y1])]
}
var duoProp = { color: ["red", "black"], percent: 0.30, width: 15 };
var duoPath = pathPoints("M30,30C160,30 150,90 250,90S350,210 250,210", 10, duoProp);
duoPath.forEach( (d, i) => {
svg.append("path")
.attr("d", d)
.attr("fill", duoProp.color[i])
.attr("stroke", "none");
});
</script>
</body>
</html>
As a quick follow-up to rioV8's excellent answer, I was able to get their code working but needed to generalise it to work with more than two colours. In case someone else has a similar requirement, here is the code:
function pathPoints(path, stepLength, duoProp) {
// get the properties of the path
var props = spp.svgPathProperties(path);
var length = props.getTotalLength();
// build a list of segments to use as approximation points
var tList = d3.range(0, length, stepLength);
tList.push(length);
var tProps = tList.map(function (d) {
return props.getPropertiesAtLength(d);
});
// incorporate the percentage
var pFactor = function pFactor(percent) {
return (percent - 0.5) * duoProp.width;
};
// for each path segment, calculate offset points
tProps.forEach(function (p) {
// create array to store modified points
p.x_arr = [];
p.y_arr = [];
// calculate offset at 0%
p.x_arr.push(p.x - pFactor(0) * p.tangentY);
p.y_arr.push(p.y + pFactor(0) * p.tangentX);
// calculate offset at each specified percent
duoProp.percents.forEach(function(perc) {
p.x_arr.push(p.x - pFactor(perc) * p.tangentY);
p.y_arr.push(p.y + pFactor(perc) * p.tangentX);
});
// calculate offset at 100%
p.x_arr.push(p.x - pFactor(1) * p.tangentY);
p.y_arr.push(p.y + pFactor(1) * p.tangentX);
});
var format1d = d3.format(".1f");
var createPath = function createPath(forward, backward) {
var fp = tProps.map(function (p) {
return forward(p);
});
var bp = tProps.map(function (p) {
return backward(p);
});
bp.reverse();
return 'M' + fp.concat(bp).map(function (p) {
return format1d(p[0]) + "," + format1d(p[1]);
}).join(' ') + 'z';
};
// create a path for each projected point
var paths = [];
for(var i=0; i <= duoProp.percents.length; i++) {
paths.push(createPath(function (p) { return [p.x_arr[i], p.y_arr[i]]; }, function (p) { return [p.x_arr[i+1], p.y_arr[i+1]]; }));
}
return paths;
}
// generate the line
var duoProp = { color: ["red", "blue", "green"], percents: [0.5, 0.7], width: 15 };
var duoPath = pathPoints("M30,30C160,30 150,90 250,90S350,210 250,210", 10, duoProp);
duoPath.forEach( (d, i) => {
svg.append("path")
.attr("d", d)
.attr("fill", duoProp.color[i])
.attr("stroke", "none");
});
Note that the percents array specifies the cumulative percentage of the stroke, not the individual percentages of the width. E.g. in the example above, the red stroke will span 0% to 50% width, the blue stroke 50% to 70% width and the green stroke 70% to 100% width.
I have a simple scatterplot in d3js. The aim of the visualization is to fade out points on a selection. This works. Congruent with this, a new trendline should appear only for those selected points as well as an updated slope equation and R2 value. The fading of points and updating of slope equation/R2 values is working on selection. However, the trendline appears to be truncated and not scaled correctly, but I can't figure out why.
Here is a working version.
Following the on.change the following code is executed:
filteredData = filterJSON(data, 'name', value); // gets filtered json data
var x = d3.scaleLinear()
.range([0,width]);
var y = d3.scaleLinear()
.range([height,0]);
var xSeries1 = filteredData.map(function(e) { return e.x; }); // new x values
var ySeries1 = filteredData.map(function(e) { return e.y; }); // new y values
var rsq1 = leastSquares(xSeries1,ySeries1); // calculates r2/slope etc. - see function below
// Add trendline
ptAx1 = d3.min(xSeries1);
ptAy1 = rsq1[0] * d3.min(xSeries1) + rsq1[1];
ptBy1 = d3.min(ySeries1);
ptBx1 = (d3.min(ySeries1) - rsq1[1]) / rsq1[0];
svg.append("line")
.attr("class", "regression")
.attr("x1", x(ptAx1))
.attr("y1", y(ptAy1))
.attr("x2", x(ptBx1))
.attr("y2", y(ptBy1));
// calculate linear regression
function leastSquares(xSeries,ySeries) {
var reduceSumFunc = function(prev, cur) { return prev + cur; };
var xBar = xSeries.reduce(reduceSumFunc) * 1.0 / xSeries.length;
var yBar = ySeries.reduce(reduceSumFunc) * 1.0 / ySeries.length;
var ssXX = xSeries.map(function(d) { return Math.pow(d - xBar, 2); })
.reduce(reduceSumFunc);
var ssYY = ySeries.map(function(d) { return Math.pow(d - yBar, 2); })
.reduce(reduceSumFunc);
var ssXY = xSeries.map(function(d, i) { return (d - xBar) * (ySeries[i] - yBar); })
.reduce(reduceSumFunc);
var slope = ssXY / ssXX;
var intercept = yBar - (xBar * slope);
var rSquare = Math.pow(ssXY, 2) / (ssXX * ssYY);
return [slope, intercept, rSquare];
}
This code works well when all data points (no filtering of data), but doesn't when filtering occurs.
This is all points - trendline ok
This is filtered points - trendline truncated
It looks like you left "min" where you meant "max" in assigning values to ptBy1 and ptBx1
Made this change in your "blockbuilder" and it seemed to work as intended.
(sorry for my english bad level)
Hi I'm using D3 for the first time with mithril js. The map is ok but I have a problem with colors of provinces and it comes from the 'd' attribute to get the id of provinces.The attribute is undefined and I don't understand what is 'd' exactly. is mithril the problem? is there an other way to get 'd' attribute?
controller.map = function(el){
var width = 1160;
var height = 960;
var scale = 10000;
var offset = [width / 2, height / 2];
var center = [0, 50.64];
var rotate = [-4.668, 0];
var parallels = [51.74, 49.34];
var projection = d3.geo.albers()
.center(center)
.rotate(rotate)
.parallels(parallels)
.scale(scale)
.translate(offset)
;
var path = d3.geo.path()
.projection(projection)
;
var svg = d3.select(el).append("svg")
.attr("width",width)
.attr("height",height)
;
d3.json("belprov.json",function(error,be){
if (error) return console.error(error);
var bounds = path.bounds(topojson.feature(be, be.objects.subunits));
var hscale = scale*width / (bounds[1][0] - bounds[0][0]);
var vscale = scale*height / (bounds[1][1] - bounds[0][1]);
scale = (hscale < vscale) ? hscale : vscale;
offset = [width - (bounds[0][0] + bounds[1][0])/2,
height - (bounds[0][1] + bounds[1][1])/2];
var centroid = d3.geo.centroid(topojson.feature(be, be.objects.subunits));
center = [0, centroid[1]];
rotate = [-centroid[0],0];
projection = d3.geo.albers()
.center(center)
.rotate(rotate)
.parallels(parallels)
.scale(scale)
.translate(offset);
svg.selectAll(".province")
.data(topojson.feature(be, be.objects.provinces).features)
.enter().append("path")
.attr("class", function(d) { return "province " + d.id })
.attr("d", path)
;
})
};
The "d" attribute in a path object defines the successive coordinates of the points through which the path has to go (it also gives indication about whether the path should use bezier curves, straight lines, etc.). See some documentation here.
Be careful: in d3, d is often used as a parameter for anonymous functions representing the data currently binded to the current element. So the two are completely different things.
Here, your line
.attr("d", path)
should probably look more like
.attr("d", function(d){return d.path})
i.e., take the field path within the data elements.
You can do something like this to color diffrent paths:
//make a color scale
var color20 = d3.scale.category20();
//your code as you doing
//on making paths do
svg.selectAll(".province")
.data(topojson.feature(be, be.objects.provinces).features)
.enter().append("path")
.attr("class", function(d) { return "province " + d.id })
.style("fill", function(d){return color(d.id);})//do this to color path based on id.
.attr("d", path)
I'm using a d3 attrTween to translate a circle over a path smoothly, similar to this example and as shown in the picture below:
The circle's transition is defined here:
function transition() {
circle.transition()
.duration(2051)
.ease("linear")
.attrTween("transform", translateAlong(path.node()))
}
And the attribute tween is shown here:
function translateAlong(path) {
var l = path.getTotalLength();
return function (d, i, a) {
return function (t) {
var p = path.getPointAtLength(t * l);
return "translate(" + p.x + "," + p.y + ")";
};
};
}
This works well thanks to the SVG method getPointAtLength, which allows us to retrieve coordinates at different lengths of the path. However, I need a different kind of behavior and I've been unable to come up with a solution so far.
I need the circle to animate along the path, but at a steady horizontal speed. Meaning that the circle ought to take as much time to navigate this slice:
As it does with this slice:
Because both slices encompass the same width. On a low level, what I need is to be able to translate any X coordinate with its corresponding Y coordinate along the path. I've looked at all the SVG path methods and I haven't found anything particularly useful here. I'm hoping there's some way in D3 to feed an X coordinate to a d3 line and retrieve its corresponding Y coordinate.
Here's a JSFiddle working as described above. I'd really appreciate any help I can get on this. Thanks!
I ended up creating a lookup array for all my points along the line using getPointAtLength:
var lookup = [];
var granularity = 1000;
var l = path.node().getTotalLength();
for(var i = 1; i <= granularity; i++) {
var p = path.node().getPointAtLength(l * (i/granularity))
lookup.push({
x: p.x,
y: p.y
})
}
Once I had all those points in my lookup table, I used a bisector in my translate tween:
var xBisect = d3.bisector(function(d) { return d.x; }).left;
function translateAlong(path) {
var l = path.getTotalLength();
return function (d, i, a) {
return function (t) {
var index = xBisect(lookup, l * t);
var p = lookup[index];
return "translate(" + p.x + "," + p.y + ")";
};
};
}
And it works as expected! Yahoo!
Fiddle
I am trying to make a bar chart containing 3 'groups' of data in d3.js. I have been able to implement the example from "Let's Make a Bar Chart" sample http://bost.ocks.org/mike/bar/2/, but am wondering how you would implement that with a 2 dimensional data set instead.
I'm having a bit of a tough time wrapping my head around what I feel should be a fairly straight forward process (select first index of 2d array -> iterate through that array and display the values of each element in bars -> select second index of array -> iterate through that array and display the value of each element in bars etc...), so examples would be hugely appreciated.
The code thus far is:
var data = [4, 8, 15, 16, 23, 42];*/
var width = Math.max(500, innerWidth), height = Math.max(500, innerHeight), barHeight = 80;
var x = d3.scale.linear().domain([0, d3.max(data)]).range([0, width]);
var chart = d3.select(".chart").attr("width", width).attr("height", barHeight * data.length * 3);
var bar = chart.selectAll("g").data(data).enter().append("g").attr("transform", function(d, i) { return "translate(0," + i * barHeight + ")"; });
bar.append("rect").attr("width", x).attr("height", barHeight - 1);
bar.append("text").attr("x", function(d) { return x(d) - 3; }).attr("y", barHeight / 2).attr("dy", ".35em").text(function(d) { return d; });
however I would like to change the "data" variable to be:
var data = [[40,45,5],
[50,49,2],
[60,62,4],
[40,41,6],
[42,40,3],
[65,67,10],
[70,67,17],
[66,65,2],
[45,44,3],
[39,38,7],
[38,38,8],
[45,40,4],
[43,35,3],
[50,65,8],
[51,50,6]];