I need to construct a table which will have complex col and row. How can I construct this kind of table?
I've already tried to construct but it seems that the output is not what I wished for. I want to make a left header which span two rows and the rows will have header and input field.
This is my code that I've already tried. I failed whenever i try to put theader to all the fields.
<table>
<tr>
<td rowspan="2">Flock ID</td>
<td>Field 1</td>
<td>Field 2</td>
<td>Field 3</td>
<td>Field 4</td>
<td>Field 5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Field 6</td>
<td>Field 7</td>
<td>Field 8</td>
<td>Field 9</td>
<td>Field 10</td>
</tr>
</table>
The table should have a columnn that span two rows. For each row there will be several headers.
This the example pic of my expected table
Related
The following code gets all the tr tags in #mytable:
table = document.getElementById("myTable");
trs = table.getElementsByTagName("tr");
But if we want to get only tr tags whose display is not none, what should I do?
Thanks.
Not the best solution, but you can do this...
let tableRows = $("#my-table tr");
tableRows.map((i, obj)=>{
if($(obj).attr('style') != 'display: none;'){
// whatever you want to do here...
console.log(obj);
}
});
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.3.0/jquery.min.js"></script>
<table id="my-table">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>data 1</td>
<td>data 2</td>
</tr>
<tr style="display: none;">
<td>data 3</td>
<td>data 4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>data 5</td>
<td>data 6</td>
</tr>
<tr style="display: none;">
<td>data 7</td>
<td>data 8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>data 9</td>
<td>data 10</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
You can use the :visible selector which is a jquery extension (https://api.jquery.com/visible-selector/) that allows seelction of elements based on display visibility.
In the following snippet - there are 3 tr's but the middle one is hidden with display:none. The console log targets the visible tr's and logs the number (2);
$(document).ready(function(){
const totalRows = $('#myTable tr');
const visibleRows = totalRows.filter(':visible');
console.log('total rows: '+ totalRows.length); // gives 3
console.log('visible rows: '+ visibleRows.length); // gives 2 - since one tr is hidden
})
.second-row {
display: none;
}
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.3.1/jquery.min.js"></script>
<table id="myTable">
<tbody>
<tr class="first-row">
<td>row 1</td>
<td>row 1</td>
<td>row 1</td>
</tr>
<tr class="second-row">
<td>row 2</td>
<td>row 2</td>
<td>row 2</td>
</tr>
<tr class="third-row">
<td>row 3</td>
<td>row 3</td>
<td>row 3</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
Simple solution with VanillaJS
var elems = document.querySelectorAll('tr');
var noneElems = [];
elems.forEach(function (element) {
if (window.getComputedStyle(element).display == 'none') {
noneElems.push(element);
}
});
console.log( { noneElems } );
<table id="mytable">
<tr>
<td>Block</td>
<td>1</td>
</tr>
<tr style="display:none">
<td>None</td>
<td>1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Block</td>
<td>2</td>
</tr>
<tr style="display:none">
<td>None</td>
<td>2</td>
</tr>
</table>
If I have the following table, which I can't manually touch, but can apply javascript to...
<table data="customTable">
<tr>
<td>item 1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="10"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>item 2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="10"></td>
</tr>
</table>
...when the DOM loads fully, how can I remove every instance of <tr><td height="10"></td></tr> from the above table via jQuery or raw JavaScript? I don't need that row at all and its causing design issues for me. This is my first time trying to learn how to replace a full pattern of elements.
Hopefully, this is doable via JavaScript?
This should do the trick.
jQuery
$('td[height="10"]').parent().remove();
https://jsfiddle.net/uzv3fn2e/1/
Vanilla JS
Array.from(document.querySelectorAll('td[height="10"]')).forEach(td => td.parentNode.remove());
https://jsfiddle.net/t7y6aqc5/
You can use :has() selector to select tr that has td with specific attribute
$("tr:has(td[height='10'])").remove()
$("tr:has(td[height='10'])").remove()
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.3.1/jquery.min.js"></script>
<table data="customTable">
<tr>
<td>item 1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="10"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>item 2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="10"></td>
</tr>
</table>
without using jquery javascript has also remove()
document.querySelectorAll("td").forEach(el => el.getAttribute("height") === "10" && el.parentNode.remove())
<table data="customTable">
<tr>
<td>item 1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="10"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>item 2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="10"></td>
</tr>
</table>
I'm currently trying to dynamically populate a bootstrap 4 table from an array. I am trying to populate 3 tables that are actually side by side, and then will eventually filter the data from the array to be stored in each corresponding table. So what I am aiming to have is 3 tables that can be populated with a different number of rows each, with data taken directly from an array.
However, whenever I try and populate or create the table dynamically through a function, I either remove the Bootstrap formatting, or end up with some very odd results!
Below is essentially the type of layout I want to achieve, but this is static and I'd love to have something that can acquire these varying rows, based on how much data they retrieve from an array.
<div class="row">
<div class="col-md-4">
<h2 class="sub-header">Test Tab 1</h2>
<div class="table-responsive">
<table class="table table-striped">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="col-md-1">Content 1</td>
<td class="col-md-2">Content 1</td>
<td class="col-md-3">Content 1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="col-md-1">Content 2</td>
<td class="col-md-2">Content 2</td>
<td class="col-md-3">Content 2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="col-md-1">Content 3</td>
<td class="col-md-2">Content 3</td>
<td class="col-md-3">Content 3</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
<div class="col-md-4">
<h2 class="sub-header">Test Tab 2</h2>
<div class="table-responsive">
<table class="table table-striped">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="col-md-1">Content 4</td>
<td class="col-md-2">Content 4</td>
<td class="col-md-3">Content 4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="col-md-1">Content 5</td>
<td class="col-md-2">Content 5</td>
<td class="col-md-3">Content 5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="col-md-1">Content 6</td>
<td class="col-md-2">Content 6</td>
<td class="col-md-3">Content 6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="col-md-1">Content 7</td>
<td class="col-md-2">Content 7</td>
<td class="col-md-3">Content 7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="col-md-1">Content 8</td>
<td class="col-md-2">Content 8</td>
<td class="col-md-3">Content 8</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
<div class="col-md-4">
<h2 class="sub-header">Test Tab 3</h2>
<div class="table-responsive">
<table class="table table-striped">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="col-md-1">Content 9</td>
<td class="col-md-2">Content 9</td>
<td class="col-md-3">Content 9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="col-md-1">Content 10</td>
<td class="col-md-2">Content 10</td>
<td class="col-md-3">Content 10</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="col-md-1">Content 11</td>
<td class="col-md-2">Content 11</td>
<td class="col-md-3">Content 11</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="col-md-1">Content 12</td>
<td class="col-md-2">Content 12</td>
<td class="col-md-3">Content 12</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="col-md-1">Content 13</td>
<td class="col-md-2">Content 13</td>
<td class="col-md-3">Content 13</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="col-md-1">Content 14</td>
<td class="col-md-2">Content 14</td>
<td class="col-md-3">Content 14</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="col-md-1">Content 15</td>
<td class="col-md-2">Content 15</td>
<td class="col-md-3">Content 15</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
When experimenting with just a single one of these tables to try and get the general concept working, I've just been going around in circles and can't seem to figure out this hierarchy of table elements and how to associate the javascript created rows to the bootstrap classes for design.
Below is my attempt, but it doesn't seem to alter the base bootstrap html or make any changes at all (one of numerous attempts)(credit to Ovidiu for fixing the error):
var testList = ["TestContent1", "TestContent2", "TestContent3", "TestContent4"];
function drawTable1() {
// get the reference for the body
var table1 = document.getElementById('table1Div');
// get reference for <table> element
var tbl = document.getElementById("table1");
// creating rows
for (var r = 0; r < testList.length; r++) {
var row = document.createElement("tr");
// create cells in row
for (var c = 0; c < 3; c++) {
var cell = document.createElement("td");
var cellText = document.createElement('span');
cellText.innerText = testList[r];
cell.appendChild(cellText);
row.appendChild(cell);
}
tbl.appendChild(row); // add the row to the end of the table body
}
table1.appendChild(tbl); // appends <table> into <div>
}
drawTable1();
Edit: To clarify, my question differs from the duplicate as I would still like to retain my bootstrap formatting. Simply creating a dynamic table removes all of the bootstrap classes and formatting that keeps the tables responsive.
Edit 2: Thank you Ovidiu for the working fiddle! This more clearly illustrates my point that the Bootstrap formatting is no longer applied once the table has been populated dynamically!
To add classes from JavaScript use className property:
var div = document.createElement('div');
div.className = 'some-class other-class';
You may also want to avoid using classes like col-md-3 with tables. Bootstrap layoud is float based while tables have their own display types in HTML/CSS and changing them to floats won't work (especially that you are not using row on rows etc.). Either move to purely <div> based layout or use width=8%, width=17% and width=25% respectively. And of course fix the bug of the widths not summing up to 100% (col-md-1 + col-md-2 + col-md-3 = col-md-6 < col-md-12 (12 is 100% row width in Bootstrap)). Or if you really want free space, then either add it explicitly as an empty cell or just set the whole table width to be 50%.
Answer to comment:
If you are going to use table-stripped then you need table to be <table> and not <div>, obviously. However you MUST NOT use col-md-# classes with table cells. Use width="33%" (or other appropriate value) attribute instead. If you create the whole table content dynamically, you may add <colgroup> sections and define columns separately from the content. Also, you should append your rows inside <tbody> not <table>. Appending them to <table> works only due to browser being backward compatibile with HTML 3, but Bootstrap is not and its styling gets broken. Bootstrap expects all the cells to be either in <thead>, <tbody> or <tfoot>, not directly under <table>. Example code:
<table class="table table-striped">
<colgroup>
<col width="17%">
<col width="33%">
<col width="50%">
</colgroup>
<tbody id="table2">
<tr>
<td>Content 4</td>
<td>Content 4</td>
<td>Content 4</td>
</tr>
<!-- etc. --->
</tbody>
</table>
I am trying to get the row no and column no of cell on which user has clicked
my code is giving the correct column no but row no always giving 0 and 1
I am using the following code
help me to find the reason why giving the row no always 0 and 1
<script>
$('td').click(function(){
col = $(this).parent().children().index($(this));
row = $(this).parent().parent().children().index($(this).parent());
alert("row no:"+row+"col no :"+col);
</script>
You can simply use $(element).index() to get that element's index within it's siblings
$('td').click(function() {
var col = $(this).index(),
row = $(this).parent().index();
console.log("row index:" + row + ", col index :" + col);
});
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/2.1.1/jquery.min.js"></script>
<table>
<tr>
<td>Item 1</td>
<td>Item 2</td>
<td>Item 3</td>
<td>Item 4</td>
<td>Item 5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Item 1</td>
<td>Item 2</td>
<td>Item 3</td>
<td>Item 4</td>
<td>Item 5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Item 1</td>
<td>Item 2</td>
<td>Item 3</td>
<td>Item 4</td>
<td>Item 5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Item 1</td>
<td>Item 2</td>
<td>Item 3</td>
<td>Item 4</td>
<td>Item 5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Item 1</td>
<td>Item 2</td>
<td>Item 3</td>
<td>Item 4</td>
<td>Item 5</td>
</tr>
</table>
It is much simpler and faster without jQuery if you use .cellIndex and .rowIndex.
$('td').click(function(){
var col = this.cellIndex,
row = this.parentNode.rowIndex;
alert("row no:"+row+"col no :"+col);
As noted by #PatrickRoberts below, old Opera's behavior (version 12 and lower) deviates in that it honors the thead/tbody/tfoot order in HTML that you provide, so if you put the tfoot above the tbody (which is really where it should go), and it has one or more rows, the tbody rows will be offset by that much.
The correct behavior is to consider the thead at the top and the tbody at the bottom, irrespective of where they were defined.
This is no longer an issue in modern Opera since it now uses Chrome's Webkit fork, so the behavior is consistent.
Also note that jQuery's manual .index() calculation will only take into account the children of the given tbody, assuming that's the context here.
I have a pretty challenging sorting problem for a price table which has to be sorted by columns not rows.
The problem is an unsorted table:
<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td>Cheapest</td>
<td>Option 1</td>
<td>Option 2</td>
<td>Option 3</td>
<td>Option 4</td>
<td>Option 5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Price 1</td>
<td data-price="20.82">€ 20,82</td>
<td data-price="100.95">€ 100,95</td>
<td data-price="300.20">€ 300,20</td>
<td data-price="0"></td>
<td data-price="158.72">€ 158,72</td>
<td data-price="0"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Price 2</td>
<td data-price="55.66">€ 55,66</td>
<td data-price="100.95">€ 100,95</td>
<td data-price="0"></td>
<td data-price="128.72">€ 128,72</td>
<td data-price="158.72">€ 158,72</td>
<td data-price="105.22">€ 105,22</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
What I need to accomplish:
The table needs to be sorted from left to right (columns)
The first two columns have to stay at there positions (dont sort)
The value to be sorted is in the data-price attribute
An empty value is repesented by a 0 value and has to be at the end
If there are multiple empty values, they have to be sorted on the second row value
I created a Fiddle to show the desired result and explain a little more
I have found enough solutions for sorting by rows or td by only one single row. I cant figure this challenging one out.