I am using the Nebular Angular theme. when my object is returned in the object ServerDataSource, you have to supply a key to get that string. However, in my
case, an object is returned and I need to try and select that string by selecting first the object and then the string.
I've already tried solutions such as "dataKey: 'data.page.maximum'" and so on.
this.tableBulkProductsOverviewRemoteSource = new ServerDataSource(this.httpClient, {
endPoint: 'URL',
dataKey: 'data',
totalKey: 'data.page.total',
pagerPageKey: ''
});
In the total key, I am trying to get the object and then the string via a string.
Is there any way around this?
Related
Looking for clean way to convert a javascript object containing arrays as values to a search param compatible query string. Serializing an element from each array before moving to the next index.
Using libraries such as querystring or qs, converts the object just fine, but handles each array independently. Passing the resulting string to the server (which I cannot change) causes an error in handling of the items as each previous value is overwritten by the next. Using any kind of array notation in the query string is not supported. The only option I have not tried is a custom sort function, but seems like it would be worse than writing a custom function to parse the object. Any revision to the object that would generate the expected result is welcome as well.
var qs = require("qs")
var jsobj = {
origString:['abc','123'],
newString:['abcd','1234'],
action:'compare'
}
qs.stringify(jsobj,{encode:false})
qs.stringify(jsobj,{encode:false,indices:false})
qs.stringify(jsobj,{encode:false,indices:false,arrayFormat:'repeat'})
Result returned is
"origString=abc&origString=123&newString=abcd&newString=1234&action=compare"
Result desired would be
"origString=abc&newString=abcd&origString=123&newString=1234&action=compare"
I tried reorder your json:
> var jsobj = [{origString: 'abc', newString: 'abcd' }, {origString: '123',
newString: '1234' }, {action:'compare'}]
> qs.stringify(jsobj,{encode:false})
'0[origString]=abc&0[newString]=abcd&1[origString]=123&1[newString]=1234&2[action]=compare'
But I don't know if this is a good alternative for your problem.
Chalk this up to misunderstanding of the application. After spending some more time with the API I realized my mistake, and as posted above by others, order does no matter. Not sure why my first several attempts failed but the question is 'answered'
This is sample JSON I got {"valueofa" : 1234}.To print the value it is something like body.valueofa. However, this valueofa can be anything like apple or something else. So to parse that I object I had tried with ${body}.${value} which isn't working and it's shouldn't be. How can I set the variable with body. So that I can parse the body whatever the value is.
If your object always contains only one key value pair like shown in the question, and you don't care about the key, you can just use Object.values()
console.log(Object.values({"valueofa" : 1234})[0]);
console.log(Object.values({"apple" : 1234})[0]);
The same is true for objects holding multiple key value pairs, Object.values() will return an array of all the values in your object if you omit accessing the first element with [0]
You can access a value of JSON using square brackets.
var value = "valueofa";
body[value];
I had a question about best practice for passing a list of XML xpath values to a function.
I'm just a beginner programmer and am just learning javascript.
What I want to do is define an object with criteria (done this okay), and a list of results I want back from a query, both of which that can be passed to a function.
The following is working, but I'm thinking that probably sending the xpath as the key in the object is probably not the best idea, with null values. I get back an object from the function with the keys I sent and the values.
var myCriteria = { prospect_id : 98888158, type : 13};
var myResults = { 'total_results':null , 'visitor_activity/id':null };
myResults = pardotQuery(authentication, 'visitorActivity', myCriteria, myResults);
I thought about just passing it in as an array, then converting it into an object that gets returned with keys, and values.
Please advice what would be best.
Thanks.
I have a grid using jqgrid. I need to store the some data returned by the url:, in a local variable so that I can display it in the subgrid. For this I add that column as a hidden column in the main grid, which is of the format in json:
"Details":[{"Name":"ttt", "Quantity":"12"}] .
Then in the loadcomplete: function I save the value to a variable using
var griddata = $("#grid').getCol('Details', false);
Now when I access griddata[0], I get a object Object. I tried to parse it to get the values correctly, but to no avail. I tried:
griddata[0].Details.Name
or
griddata[0].Details.0.Name
or
griddata[0].Name,
but all failed. I guess I am missing the format if the data returned by the getcol() function.I looked up the documentation on the method and it says that it returns just the values when we specify false, but could not get any examples.
If there are any examples or if there are any pointer to the solution, it will be greatly appreciated.
If you check the type of griddata[0] (for example with typeof operator) you will see that it has type of string - this is because the value you are getting is the result of toString() on the object you have passed. The reason for that is the way in which jqGrid is treating values.
If you want to store JSON as the value, you need to stringify it entirely:
"Details": "[{\"Name\":\"ttt\", \"Quantity\":\"12\"}]"
Now you can deserialize those string values into objects like this:
var griddata = $.map($("#grid").jqGrid('getCol', 'Details', false), function(value) {
return JSON.parse(value);
});
After that you can access the objects in the way you want:
var name = griddata[0].Name;
var quantity = griddata[0].Quantity;
As an alternative you can split your object into two columns, so the values can be accessed directly with getCol.
I am working on an app that heavily uses JavaScript. I am attempting to include some object-oriented practices. In this attempt, I have created a basic class like such:
function Item() { this.init(); }
Item.prototype = {
init: function () {
this.data = {
id: 0,
name: "",
description: ""
}
},
save: function() {
alert("Saving...");
$.ajax({
url: getUrl(),
type: "POST",
data: JSON.stringify(this.data),
contentType: "application/json"
});
}
}
I am creating Item instances in my app and then saving them to local storage like such:
Item item = new Item();
window.localStorage.setItem("itemKey", JSON.stringify(item));
On another page, or at another time, I am retriving that item from local storage like such:
var item = window.localStorage.getItem("itemKey");
item = JSON.parse(item);
item.save();
Unfortunately, the "save" function does not seem to get reached. In the console window, there is an error that says:
*save_Click
(anonymous function)
onclick*
I have a hunch that the "(anonymous function)" is the console window's way of saying "calling item.save(), but item is an anonymous type, so I am trying to access an anonymous function". My problem is, I'm not sure how to convert "var item" into an Item class instance again. Can someone please show me?
Short answer:
Functions cannot be serialized into JSON.
Explanation:
JSON is a cross-platform serialization scheme based on a subset of JS literal syntax. This being the case, it can only store certain things. Per http://www.json.org/ :
Objects: An object is an unordered set of name/value pairs. An object begins with { (left brace) and ends with } (right brace). Each name is followed by : (colon) and the name/value pairs are separated by , (comma).
Arrays: An array is an ordered collection of values. An array begins with [ (left bracket) and ends with ] (right bracket). Values are separated by , (comma).
values: A value can be a string in double quotes, or a number, or true or false or null, or an object or an array. These structures can be nested.
Functions cannot be serialized into JSON because another non-JS platform would not be able to unserialize and use it. Consider the example in reverse. Say I had a PHP object at my server which contained properties and methods. If I serialized that object with PHP's json_encode() and methods were included in the output, how would my JavaScript ever be able to parse and understand PHP code in the methods, let alone use those methods?
What you are seeing in your resulting JSON is the toString() value of the function on the platform you're using. The JSON serilizer calls toString() on anything being serialized which isn't proper for JSON.
I believe your solution is to stop storing instances in JSON/local storage. Rather, save pertinent data for an instance which you set back to a new instance when you need.
I know this question is answered already, however I stumbled upon this by accident and wanted to share a solution to this problem, if anyone is interested.
instead of doing this:
var item = window.localStorage.getItem("itemKey");
item = JSON.parse(item);
item.save();
do something like this:
// get serialized JSON
var itemData = window.localStorage.getItem("itemKey");
//instantiate new Item object
var item = new Item();
// extend item with data
$.extend(item, JSON.parse(itemData));
// this should now work
item.save();
this will work so long as the function you are wanting to call (ie, save()) is prototypal and not an instance method (often times the case, and is indeed the case in the OP's original question.
the $.extend method is a utility method of jquery, but it is trivial to roll your own.
You cant do that, how can javascript possibly knows that item have a save function ? json doesnt allow functions as datas. just read the json spec , you cant save functions.
what you need to do is to create a serialize and deserialize method in the hash you want to stock. that will specifiy what to export and how you can "wake up" an object after parsing the corresponding json string.
You can only store plain Objects in DOMstorages (cookies, urlparams..., everything that needs [de]serialisation through JSON.stringify/JSON.parse). So what you did when sending the ajax data
ajaxsend(this.data);
also applies to string serialisation. You can only store the data, not the instance attributes (like prototype, constructor etc.). So use
savestring(JSON.stringify(item.data));
which is possible because item.data is such a plain Object. And when restoring it, you will only get that plain data Object back. In your case it's easy to reconstruct a Item instance from plain data, because your Items hold their values (only) in a public available property:
var item = new Item;
item.data = JSON.parse(getjsonstring());
Disclaimer
Not a full time time J.S. Developer, answer may have some minor bugs:
Long Boring Explanation
As mentioned by #JAAulde, your object cannot be serialized into JSON, because has functions, the technique that you are using doesn't allow it.
Many people forget or ignore that the objects that are used in an application, may not be exactly the same as saved / restored from storage.
Short & quick Answer
Since you already encapsulate the data members of your object into a single field,
you may want to try something like this:
// create J.S. object from prototype
Item item = new Item();
// assign values as you app. logic requires
item.data.name = "John Doe";
item.data.description = "Cool developer, office ladies, love him";
// encoded item into a JSON style string, not stored yet
var encodedItem = JSON.stringify(item.data)
// store string as a JSON string
window.localStorage.setItem("itemKey", encodedItem);
// do several stuff
// recover item from storage as JSON encoded string
var encodedItem = window.localStorage.getItem("itemKey");
// transform into J.S. object
item.data = JSON.parse(encodedItem);
// do other stuff
Cheers.