Basically, I'm trying to get a username by id from Sequelize. The problem is that I am either stuck with a CORS problem or 500 Internal Server error depending on the response(status)
cors and 500
controller code
async getUserFromUserId (req, res) {
try {
// const user = await User.findByPk(req.body.id)
const id = req.body.id
const user = await User.findByPk(id)
res.send(user.username)
} catch (err) {
// or res.status(some random number).send() for CORS problem to appear
res.status(500).send({
error: 'an error has occured trying to fetch the users id'
})
}
},
client code
this.notifiedUser = (await UserService.getUserFromUserId({id: UserId})).data
I get a Status: 200 OK from postman though.
Postman Solution
Edit:
I have seen how the other Solution for the cors thingy, but the solutions does not specify as to why I get "undefined" results after resolving the cors problem.
So, CORS is actually really obnoxious in this regard, but there's a fairly straightforward way to fix this. It's a super useful security feature, though it is frustrating at best sometimes.
Your browser does what is called a Preflight Request, which is of the http verb OPTIONS. Your browser calls whatever route you want, but instead of what you asked it to do, it calls using OPTIONS first. Your server should accept all routes that the client can ask for with the OPTIONS method, and your server should respond with the following headers to be an externally available, cross-origin API.
Access-Control-Allow-Origin: *
Access-Control-Allow-Methods: GET, POST, ...
(note, you should not put the ... in, but you can put any HTTP verb in this list)
If you require your own headers (for auth purposes), you want to add this header for Client -> Server.
Access-Control-Allow-Headers: YourHeader, YourHeader2, YourHeader3
You want to add this one for Server -> Client
Access-Control-Expose-Headers: YourHeader,YourHeader3
Note that the OPTIONS call is an entirely separate call that you should handle as well as the GET method.
You've now told the browser what it is allowed to ask for, and what it can expect to get back from your API. If you don't respond to the OPTIONS request, the browser terminates the request, resulting in a CORS error.
I'm going to take a gander at a guess and assume you're likely using Express, which this answer describes how to set the headers on.
What do the headers mean, in English?
Access-Control-Allow-Origin
From where are clients allowed to access this resource (endpoint)? This can match partial domains with wildcards, or just a * to allow anywhere.
Access-Control-Allow-Methods
What HTTP methods are permissible on this route?
Access-Control-Expose-Headers
When I get a response from the server, what should I (the browser) expose to the client-side?
Access-Control-Allow-Headers
What am I as the client side allowed to send as headers?
Okay, so I figured out the problem.
In a way, I did not have to deal with any of the cors stuff because I believe that was not the main source of the problem.
So, instead of accessing my database data through "GET" and getting the data by doing this:
this.data = (Service.function(bodyValue)).data
I did "POST" to get the data, and accessed the data by simply doing this
const response = Service.function({
id: bodyValue
})
this.data = response.data
This accesses the data without having to get "secured" information from the database, but by accessing the data from the database by getting Observer object info from the database.
The Observer object looks as follows, which treats the user data as an object instead of pure data.
Compared to a data object, where each data {...} has user information.
I am not sure if I am using the correct words, but these are to the extent of my current understanding.
If your origin is from localhost, Chrome usually blocks any CORS request originating from this origin.
You can install this extension:
https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/allow-cors-access-control/lhobafahddgcelffkeicbaginigeejlf?hl=en
Or you can disable the security when running chrome (add the flag):
--disable-web-security
Related
I can hit this endpoint, http://catfacts-api.appspot.com/api/facts?number=99 via Postman and it returns JSON
Additionally I am using create-react-app and would like to avoid setting up any server config.
In my client code I am trying to use fetch to do the same thing, but I get the error:
No 'Access-Control-Allow-Origin' header is present on the requested
resource. Origin 'http://localhost:3000' is therefore not allowed
access. If an opaque response serves your needs, set the request's
mode to 'no-cors' to fetch the resource with CORS disabled.
So I am trying to pass in an object, to my Fetch which will disable CORS, like so:
fetch('http://catfacts-api.appspot.com/api/facts?number=99', { mode: 'no-cors'})
.then(blob => blob.json())
.then(data => {
console.table(data);
return data;
})
.catch(e => {
console.log(e);
return e;
});
Interestingly enough the error I get is actually a syntax error with this function. I am not sure my actual fetch is broken, because when I remove the { mode: 'no-cors' } object, and supply it with a different URL it works just fine.
I have also tried to pass in the object { mode: 'opaque'} , but this returns the original error from above.
I belive all I need to do is disable CORS.. What am I missing?
mode: 'no-cors' won’t magically make things work. In fact it makes things worse, because one effect it has is to tell browsers, “Block my frontend JavaScript code from seeing contents of the response body and headers under all circumstances.” Of course you never want that.
What happens with cross-origin requests from frontend JavaScript is that browsers by default block frontend code from accessing resources cross-origin. If Access-Control-Allow-Origin is in a response, then browsers relax that blocking and allow your code to access the response.
But if a site sends no Access-Control-Allow-Origin in its responses, your frontend code can’t directly access responses from that site. In particular, you can’t fix it by specifying mode: 'no-cors' (in fact that’ll ensure your frontend code can’t access the response contents).
However, one thing that will work: if you send your request through a CORS proxy.
You can also easily deploy your own proxy to Heroku in just 2-3 minutes, with 5 commands:
git clone https://github.com/Rob--W/cors-anywhere.git
cd cors-anywhere/
npm install
heroku create
git push heroku master
After running those commands, you’ll end up with your own CORS Anywhere server running at, for example, https://cryptic-headland-94862.herokuapp.com/.
Prefix your request URL with your proxy URL; for example:
https://cryptic-headland-94862.herokuapp.com/https://example.com
Adding the proxy URL as a prefix causes the request to get made through your proxy, which:
Forwards the request to https://example.com.
Receives the response from https://example.com.
Adds the Access-Control-Allow-Origin header to the response.
Passes that response, with that added header, back to the requesting frontend code.
The browser then allows the frontend code to access the response, because that response with the Access-Control-Allow-Origin response header is what the browser sees.
This works even if the request is one that triggers browsers to do a CORS preflight OPTIONS request, because in that case, the proxy also sends back the Access-Control-Allow-Headers and Access-Control-Allow-Methods headers needed to make the preflight successful.
I can hit this endpoint, http://catfacts-api.appspot.com/api/facts?number=99 via Postman
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Access_control_CORS explains why it is that even though you can access the response with Postman, browsers won’t let you access the response cross-origin from frontend JavaScript code running in a web app unless the response includes an Access-Control-Allow-Origin response header.
http://catfacts-api.appspot.com/api/facts?number=99 has no Access-Control-Allow-Origin response header, so there’s no way your frontend code can access the response cross-origin.
Your browser can get the response fine and you can see it in Postman and even in browser devtools—but that doesn’t mean browsers expose it to your code. They won’t, because it has no Access-Control-Allow-Origin response header. So you must instead use a proxy to get it.
The proxy makes the request to that site, gets the response, adds the Access-Control-Allow-Origin response header and any other CORS headers needed, then passes that back to your requesting code. And that response with the Access-Control-Allow-Origin header added is what the browser sees, so the browser lets your frontend code actually access the response.
So I am trying to pass in an object, to my Fetch which will disable CORS
You don’t want to do that. To be clear, when you say you want to “disable CORS” it seems you actually mean you want to disable the same-origin policy. CORS itself is actually a way to do that — CORS is a way to loosen the same-origin policy, not a way to restrict it.
But anyway, it’s true you can—in your local environment—do suff like give a browser runtime flags to disable security and run insecurely, or you can install a browser extension locally to get around the same-origin policy, but all that does is change the situation just for you locally.
No matter what you change locally, anybody else trying to use your app is still going to run into the same-origin policy, and there’s no way you can disable that for other users of your app.
You most likely never want to use mode: 'no-cors' in practice except in a few limited cases, and even then only if you know exactly what you’re doing and what the effects are. That’s because what setting mode: 'no-cors' actually says to the browser is, “Block my frontend JavaScript code from looking into the contents of the response body and headers under all circumstances.” In most cases that’s obviously really not what you want.
As far as the cases when you would want to consider using mode: 'no-cors', see the answer at What limitations apply to opaque responses? for the details. The gist of it is:
In the limited case when you’re using JavaScript to put content from another origin into a <script>, <link rel=stylesheet>, <img>, <video>, <audio>, <object>, <embed>, or <iframe> element (which works because embedding of resources cross-origin is allowed for those)—but for some reason you don’t want to/can’t do that just by having the markup of the document use the resource URL as the href or src attribute for the element.
When the only thing you want to do with a resource is to cache it. As alluded to in What limitations apply to opaque responses?, in practice the scenario that’s for is when you’re using Service Workers, in which case the API that’s relevant is the Cache Storage API.
But even in those limited cases, there are some important gotchas to be aware of; see the answer at What limitations apply to opaque responses? for the details.
I have also tried to pass in the object { mode: 'opaque'}
There is no 'opaque' request mode — opaque is instead just a property of the response, and browsers set that opaque property on responses from requests sent with no-cors mode.
But incidentally the word opaque is a pretty explicit signal about the nature of the response you end up with: “opaque” means you can’t see into any of its details; it blocks you from seeing.
If you are trying to address this issue temporarily on your localhost, you can use this chrome extension : Allow CORS Access-Control-Allow-Origin
https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/allow-cors-access-control/lhobafahddgcelffkeicbaginigeejlf
If you are using Express as back-end you just have to install cors and import and use it in app.use(cors());.
If it is not resolved then try switching ports.
It will surely resolve after switching ports
So if you're like me and developing a website on localhost where you're trying to fetch data from Laravel API and use it in your Vue front-end, and you see this problem, here is how I solved it:
In your Laravel project, run command php artisan make:middleware Cors. This will create app/Http/Middleware/Cors.php for you.
Add the following code inside the handles function in Cors.php:
return $next($request)
->header('Access-Control-Allow-Origin', '*')
->header('Access-Control-Allow-Methods', 'GET, POST, PUT, DELETE, OPTIONS');
In app/Http/kernel.php, add the following entry in $routeMiddleware array:
‘cors’ => \App\Http\Middleware\Cors::class
(There would be other entries in the array like auth, guest etc. Also make sure you're doing this in app/Http/kernel.php because there is another kernel.php too in Laravel)
Add this middleware on route registration for all the routes where you want to allow access, like this:
Route::group(['middleware' => 'cors'], function () {
Route::get('getData', 'v1\MyController#getData');
Route::get('getData2', 'v1\MyController#getData2');
});
In Vue front-end, make sure you call this API in mounted() function and not in data(). Also make sure you use http:// or https:// with the URL in your fetch() call.
Full credits to Pete Houston's blog article.
You can also set up a reverse proxy which adds the CORS headers using a self-hosted CORS Anywhere or Just CORS if you want a managed solution.
https://justcors.com/<id>/<your-requested-resource>
http://cors-anywhere.com/<your-requested-resource>
Very easy solution (2 min to config) is to use local-ssl-proxy package from npm
The usage is straight pretty forward:
1. Install the package:
npm install -g local-ssl-proxy
2. While running your local-server mask it with the local-ssl-proxy --source 9001 --target 9000
P.S: Replace --target 9000 with the -- "number of your port" and --source 9001 with --source "number of your port +1"
Solution for me was to just do it server side
I used the C# WebClient library to get the data (in my case it was image data) and send it back to the client. There's probably something very similar in your chosen server-side language.
//Server side, api controller
[Route("api/ItemImage/GetItemImageFromURL")]
public IActionResult GetItemImageFromURL([FromQuery] string url)
{
ItemImage image = new ItemImage();
using(WebClient client = new WebClient()){
image.Bytes = client.DownloadData(url);
return Ok(image);
}
}
You can tweak it to whatever your own use case is. The main point is client.DownloadData() worked without any CORS errors. Typically CORS issues are only between websites, hence it being okay to make 'cross-site' requests from your server.
Then the React fetch call is as simple as:
//React component
fetch(`api/ItemImage/GetItemImageFromURL?url=${imageURL}`, {
method: 'GET',
})
.then(resp => resp.json() as Promise<ItemImage>)
.then(imgResponse => {
// Do more stuff....
)}
I had a similar problem with my browser debugger saying my response.body was null but fiddler and the developer tools show it as populated that turned out to be basically the same scenario as this. I was using a local Angular application hitting a Web Api service running on IISExpress. I fixed it by following the steps outlined here to find the correct applicationhost.config file to add a Access-Control-Allow-Origin header like so:
<customHeaders>
<clear />
<add name="X-Powered-By" value="ASP.NET" />
<add name="Access-Control-Allow-Origin" value="*" />
<add name="Access-Control-Allow-Headers" value="Content-Type" />
</customHeaders>
If all the above solutions don't work, probably it's because of the file permissions as sometimes even if you have fixed the non-cors problem using Heroku or another way, it throws 403 forbidden error. Set the directory/file permissions like this:
Permissions and ownership errors
A 403 Forbidden error can also be caused by incorrect ownership or permissions on your web content files and folders.
Permissions
Rule of thumb for correct permissions:
Folders: 755
Static Content: 644
Dynamic Content: 700
I can hit this endpoint, http://catfacts-api.appspot.com/api/facts?number=99 via Postman and it returns JSON
Additionally I am using create-react-app and would like to avoid setting up any server config.
In my client code I am trying to use fetch to do the same thing, but I get the error:
No 'Access-Control-Allow-Origin' header is present on the requested
resource. Origin 'http://localhost:3000' is therefore not allowed
access. If an opaque response serves your needs, set the request's
mode to 'no-cors' to fetch the resource with CORS disabled.
So I am trying to pass in an object, to my Fetch which will disable CORS, like so:
fetch('http://catfacts-api.appspot.com/api/facts?number=99', { mode: 'no-cors'})
.then(blob => blob.json())
.then(data => {
console.table(data);
return data;
})
.catch(e => {
console.log(e);
return e;
});
Interestingly enough the error I get is actually a syntax error with this function. I am not sure my actual fetch is broken, because when I remove the { mode: 'no-cors' } object, and supply it with a different URL it works just fine.
I have also tried to pass in the object { mode: 'opaque'} , but this returns the original error from above.
I belive all I need to do is disable CORS.. What am I missing?
mode: 'no-cors' won’t magically make things work. In fact it makes things worse, because one effect it has is to tell browsers, “Block my frontend JavaScript code from seeing contents of the response body and headers under all circumstances.” Of course you never want that.
What happens with cross-origin requests from frontend JavaScript is that browsers by default block frontend code from accessing resources cross-origin. If Access-Control-Allow-Origin is in a response, then browsers relax that blocking and allow your code to access the response.
But if a site sends no Access-Control-Allow-Origin in its responses, your frontend code can’t directly access responses from that site. In particular, you can’t fix it by specifying mode: 'no-cors' (in fact that’ll ensure your frontend code can’t access the response contents).
However, one thing that will work: if you send your request through a CORS proxy.
You can also easily deploy your own proxy to Heroku in just 2-3 minutes, with 5 commands:
git clone https://github.com/Rob--W/cors-anywhere.git
cd cors-anywhere/
npm install
heroku create
git push heroku master
After running those commands, you’ll end up with your own CORS Anywhere server running at, for example, https://cryptic-headland-94862.herokuapp.com/.
Prefix your request URL with your proxy URL; for example:
https://cryptic-headland-94862.herokuapp.com/https://example.com
Adding the proxy URL as a prefix causes the request to get made through your proxy, which:
Forwards the request to https://example.com.
Receives the response from https://example.com.
Adds the Access-Control-Allow-Origin header to the response.
Passes that response, with that added header, back to the requesting frontend code.
The browser then allows the frontend code to access the response, because that response with the Access-Control-Allow-Origin response header is what the browser sees.
This works even if the request is one that triggers browsers to do a CORS preflight OPTIONS request, because in that case, the proxy also sends back the Access-Control-Allow-Headers and Access-Control-Allow-Methods headers needed to make the preflight successful.
I can hit this endpoint, http://catfacts-api.appspot.com/api/facts?number=99 via Postman
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Access_control_CORS explains why it is that even though you can access the response with Postman, browsers won’t let you access the response cross-origin from frontend JavaScript code running in a web app unless the response includes an Access-Control-Allow-Origin response header.
http://catfacts-api.appspot.com/api/facts?number=99 has no Access-Control-Allow-Origin response header, so there’s no way your frontend code can access the response cross-origin.
Your browser can get the response fine and you can see it in Postman and even in browser devtools—but that doesn’t mean browsers expose it to your code. They won’t, because it has no Access-Control-Allow-Origin response header. So you must instead use a proxy to get it.
The proxy makes the request to that site, gets the response, adds the Access-Control-Allow-Origin response header and any other CORS headers needed, then passes that back to your requesting code. And that response with the Access-Control-Allow-Origin header added is what the browser sees, so the browser lets your frontend code actually access the response.
So I am trying to pass in an object, to my Fetch which will disable CORS
You don’t want to do that. To be clear, when you say you want to “disable CORS” it seems you actually mean you want to disable the same-origin policy. CORS itself is actually a way to do that — CORS is a way to loosen the same-origin policy, not a way to restrict it.
But anyway, it’s true you can—in your local environment—do suff like give a browser runtime flags to disable security and run insecurely, or you can install a browser extension locally to get around the same-origin policy, but all that does is change the situation just for you locally.
No matter what you change locally, anybody else trying to use your app is still going to run into the same-origin policy, and there’s no way you can disable that for other users of your app.
You most likely never want to use mode: 'no-cors' in practice except in a few limited cases, and even then only if you know exactly what you’re doing and what the effects are. That’s because what setting mode: 'no-cors' actually says to the browser is, “Block my frontend JavaScript code from looking into the contents of the response body and headers under all circumstances.” In most cases that’s obviously really not what you want.
As far as the cases when you would want to consider using mode: 'no-cors', see the answer at What limitations apply to opaque responses? for the details. The gist of it is:
In the limited case when you’re using JavaScript to put content from another origin into a <script>, <link rel=stylesheet>, <img>, <video>, <audio>, <object>, <embed>, or <iframe> element (which works because embedding of resources cross-origin is allowed for those)—but for some reason you don’t want to/can’t do that just by having the markup of the document use the resource URL as the href or src attribute for the element.
When the only thing you want to do with a resource is to cache it. As alluded to in What limitations apply to opaque responses?, in practice the scenario that’s for is when you’re using Service Workers, in which case the API that’s relevant is the Cache Storage API.
But even in those limited cases, there are some important gotchas to be aware of; see the answer at What limitations apply to opaque responses? for the details.
I have also tried to pass in the object { mode: 'opaque'}
There is no 'opaque' request mode — opaque is instead just a property of the response, and browsers set that opaque property on responses from requests sent with no-cors mode.
But incidentally the word opaque is a pretty explicit signal about the nature of the response you end up with: “opaque” means you can’t see into any of its details; it blocks you from seeing.
If you are trying to address this issue temporarily on your localhost, you can use this chrome extension : Allow CORS Access-Control-Allow-Origin
https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/allow-cors-access-control/lhobafahddgcelffkeicbaginigeejlf
If you are using Express as back-end you just have to install cors and import and use it in app.use(cors());.
If it is not resolved then try switching ports.
It will surely resolve after switching ports
So if you're like me and developing a website on localhost where you're trying to fetch data from Laravel API and use it in your Vue front-end, and you see this problem, here is how I solved it:
In your Laravel project, run command php artisan make:middleware Cors. This will create app/Http/Middleware/Cors.php for you.
Add the following code inside the handles function in Cors.php:
return $next($request)
->header('Access-Control-Allow-Origin', '*')
->header('Access-Control-Allow-Methods', 'GET, POST, PUT, DELETE, OPTIONS');
In app/Http/kernel.php, add the following entry in $routeMiddleware array:
‘cors’ => \App\Http\Middleware\Cors::class
(There would be other entries in the array like auth, guest etc. Also make sure you're doing this in app/Http/kernel.php because there is another kernel.php too in Laravel)
Add this middleware on route registration for all the routes where you want to allow access, like this:
Route::group(['middleware' => 'cors'], function () {
Route::get('getData', 'v1\MyController#getData');
Route::get('getData2', 'v1\MyController#getData2');
});
In Vue front-end, make sure you call this API in mounted() function and not in data(). Also make sure you use http:// or https:// with the URL in your fetch() call.
Full credits to Pete Houston's blog article.
You can also set up a reverse proxy which adds the CORS headers using a self-hosted CORS Anywhere or Just CORS if you want a managed solution.
https://justcors.com/<id>/<your-requested-resource>
http://cors-anywhere.com/<your-requested-resource>
Very easy solution (2 min to config) is to use local-ssl-proxy package from npm
The usage is straight pretty forward:
1. Install the package:
npm install -g local-ssl-proxy
2. While running your local-server mask it with the local-ssl-proxy --source 9001 --target 9000
P.S: Replace --target 9000 with the -- "number of your port" and --source 9001 with --source "number of your port +1"
Solution for me was to just do it server side
I used the C# WebClient library to get the data (in my case it was image data) and send it back to the client. There's probably something very similar in your chosen server-side language.
//Server side, api controller
[Route("api/ItemImage/GetItemImageFromURL")]
public IActionResult GetItemImageFromURL([FromQuery] string url)
{
ItemImage image = new ItemImage();
using(WebClient client = new WebClient()){
image.Bytes = client.DownloadData(url);
return Ok(image);
}
}
You can tweak it to whatever your own use case is. The main point is client.DownloadData() worked without any CORS errors. Typically CORS issues are only between websites, hence it being okay to make 'cross-site' requests from your server.
Then the React fetch call is as simple as:
//React component
fetch(`api/ItemImage/GetItemImageFromURL?url=${imageURL}`, {
method: 'GET',
})
.then(resp => resp.json() as Promise<ItemImage>)
.then(imgResponse => {
// Do more stuff....
)}
I had a similar problem with my browser debugger saying my response.body was null but fiddler and the developer tools show it as populated that turned out to be basically the same scenario as this. I was using a local Angular application hitting a Web Api service running on IISExpress. I fixed it by following the steps outlined here to find the correct applicationhost.config file to add a Access-Control-Allow-Origin header like so:
<customHeaders>
<clear />
<add name="X-Powered-By" value="ASP.NET" />
<add name="Access-Control-Allow-Origin" value="*" />
<add name="Access-Control-Allow-Headers" value="Content-Type" />
</customHeaders>
If all the above solutions don't work, probably it's because of the file permissions as sometimes even if you have fixed the non-cors problem using Heroku or another way, it throws 403 forbidden error. Set the directory/file permissions like this:
Permissions and ownership errors
A 403 Forbidden error can also be caused by incorrect ownership or permissions on your web content files and folders.
Permissions
Rule of thumb for correct permissions:
Folders: 755
Static Content: 644
Dynamic Content: 700
Unable to call post webservice from my application. following is the code.
var postLogin = "http://0.0.0.0:000/ddd/v1/login";
var loginvalue = {"email":"some#mail.com","password":"cbsjc6dw3bgjyfdgdKHGGDF="};
var config = {
headers: {
'Content-Type': 'application/json'
}
}
$http.post(postLogin ,loginvalue,config ).success( function(response) {
alert("response "+ response)
$scope.defer.resolve(response);
}).error(function(error){
alert("dddddd" + JSON.stringify(error));
})
If i write this code then it is returning as 400 error but if i use the postman application of google then i am getting the response without any error. So i am in confusion that whatever the code i have written is right or wrong. Hence i need to solve this issue.
Please go through the above image.
This usually happens when Client and Server are on different domains. The POST requests done by the client are first verified with a OPTIONS pre-flight check, to see if a POST would be possible. Sometimes, servers are configured to not allow OPTIONS request method. This will be the outcome of a pre-flight OPTIONS check, in such a case.
There is more information here - Why is an OPTIONS request sent and can I disable it?
Other resources for understanding the concept and helping us to configure the Response headers from the Server-side application are here:
https://medium.com/#praveen.beatle/avoiding-pre-flight-options-calls-on-cors-requests-baba9692c21a
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Glossary/Preflight_request
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/CORS
At the end of the day, if the Server is NOT configured to handle Cross-site requests, nothing can be done from the client-side.
Also, there are cases where the server does allow cross-site request, processes and send the response back to client, without the Access-Control-Allow-Origin header or with the Access-Control-Allow-Origin header, but not the same as the request origin or a wildcard "*". In such cases, browser stops processing the response, even when the call turns out to be in HTTP 200 OK Status.
Below is one such example, that I recently encountered while integrating with an external application.
I have a generated React site I am hosting in an S3 bucket. One of my components attempts to fetch something when loaded:
require('isomorphic-fetch')
...
componentDidMount() {
fetch(`${url}`)
.then(res => {
console.log(res);
this.setState({
users: res
})
})
.catch(e => {
// do nothing
})
}
The url I am fetching is an AWS API Gateway. I have enabled CORS there, via the dropdown, with no changes to the default configuration.
In my console, for both the remote site and locally during development, I see:
"Failed to load url: No 'Access-Control-Allow-Origin' header is present on the requested resource." etc
However, in the Chrome Network tab, I can see the request and the response, with status 200, etc. In the console, my console.log and this.setState are never called, however.
I understand that CORS is a common pain point, and that many questions have touched on CORS. My question: Why does the response show no error in the Network tab, while simultaneously erroring in the console?
The fetch(`${url}`) call returns a promise that resolves with a Response object, and that Response object provides methods that resolve with text, JSON data, or a Blob.
So to get the data you want, you need to do something like this:
componentDidMount() {
fetch(`${url}`)
.then(res => res.text())
.then(text => {
console.log(text);
this.setState({
users: text
})
.catch(e => {
// do nothing
})
}
Failed to load url: No 'Access-Control-Allow-Origin' header is present on the requested resource." etc
That means the browser isn’t allowing your frontend code to access the response from the server, because the response doesn’t include the Access-Control-Allow-Origin header.
So in order for the above code to work, you’ll need to fix the server configuration on that server so that it sends the necessary Access-Control-Allow-Origin response header.
However, in the Chrome Network tab, I can see the request and the response, with status 200, etc. In the console, my console.log and this.setState are never called, however.
That’s expected in the case where the server doesn’t send the Access-Control-Allow-Origin response header. In that case, the browser still gets the response — and that’s why you can see it in the devtools Network tab — but just because the browser gets the response doesn’t mean it will expose the response to your frontend JavaScript code.
The browser will only let your code access the response if it includes the Access-Control-Allow-Origin response header; if the response doesn’t include that header, then the browser blocks your code from accessing it.
My question: Why does the response show no error in the Network tab, while simultaneously erroring in the console?
For the reason outlined above. The browser itself runs into no error in getting the response. But your code hits an error because it’s trying to access an res object that’s not there; the browser hasn’t created that res object, because the browser isn’t exposing the response to your code.
You may be seeing the status 200 for the OPTIONS not the GET. There is a setting for CORS to handle legacy, so it won't confuse your client. I had to do that last time in a React app. Your error is that your CORS isn't configured properly (sorry, obviously). Chrome won't let your client tlak to the backend if it doesn't get the headers properly. Other browsers probably also, probably React also. It may be some kind of HTTP protocol if only one side has CORS enabled. Someone can correct me there. It's a similar security consideration as sending a request to HTTP from HTTPS. Chrome blocks it.
It looks to me like it's your backend. CORS isn't active or it would put that header on, and after that, you would see errors about origin mismatch in the frontend client.
In my experience, it's a 2-3 step combo, make sure OPTIONS don't send confusing signals to your client (look for settings to do with 200). This is a config setting in your backend. Then, make sure the backend is configured to use CORS. You very specifically need to enter the origin hostname and port that the backend is to expect traffic from.
I could probably give better input if I see what languages and/or frameworks you are using besides React.
This is what you would do in Express JS and node for your Backend:
const cors = require('cors')
// note http or https
app.use(cors({
origin: 'http://example.com:1337',
//origin: '*',
methods: 'GET,HEAD,PUT,PATCH,POST,DELETE',
optionsSuccessStatus: 200
// some legacy browsers (IE11, various SmartTVs) choke on 204
}))
My last React app was detonating without optionsSuccessStatus by throwing success when it was fail.
To give you a little bit of imagery to work with, CORS is simple but finicky. It's a simple matter of alignment. Once your backend is configured to a) use CORS and b) know who to accept traffic from, it's done. Once your frontend is configured to handle this traffic, it's done. It's like aligning a square peg in a round hole until you get the config settings aligned.
Try using Postman to send some GET requests to the Backend. You can observe the headers from there.
I have two domains. I'm trying to access a JSON object from one domain through a page on another. I've read everything I could find regarding this issue, and still can't figure this out.
The domain serving the JSON has the following settings:
Header set Access-Control-Allow-Origin "*"
Header set Access-Control-Allow-Methods "GET, OPTIONS"
Header set Access-Control-Allow-Headers "origin, authorization, accept"
From my other domain, I'm calling the following:
$.ajax({
type:'get',
beforeSend: function(xhr) {
var auth = // authentication;
xhr.setRequestHeader("Authorization", "Basic " + auth);
}
url:myUrl,
dataType:'json',
error: function(xhr, textStatus, errorThrown) { console.log(textStatus, errorThrown); }
})
I know that 'auth' is initialized properly (logged and checked). However, this does not work. In Firefox's Console, I get
Request URL: ...
Request Method:
OPTIONS
Status Code:
HTTP/1.1 401 Authorization Required
If I get rid of the beforeSend:... part, I see the following
Request Method:
GET
Status Code:
HTTP/1.1 401 Authorization Required
However, the domain serving JSON also can serve JSONP. I don't want to use this, mainly because the application will be running constantly on a dedicated browser, and I'm worried about this issue. More importantly, I would really like to know what is actually wrong with what I am doing. I know that for practical purposes there are various ways to overcome the JSONP memory leak (such as not using jQuery).
At any rate, when I did use JSONP, my code looked like this:
$.ajax({
url:newUrl,
dataType:'jsonp',
jsonp:'jsonp'
}).done(function(d){console.log(d)})
This gets the following
Request Method:
GET
Status Code:
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
after it prompts me with an alert box for a username and password.
Is there a fundamental difference in the way jQuery handles JSONP requests as opposed to JSON requests? And if so, how can I fix this?
Thanks.
Edit: Here's what I did find.
Basically, because I need authentication, the GET request is sending an Authorization header. However, this is not a "simple" header, and so the browser is sending a pre-flight request (the OPTIONS). This preflight request doesn't have any authentication, though, and so the server was rejecting it. The "solution" was to set the server to let OPTIONS request not require authentication, and report an HTTP status of 200 to it.
Reference: http://www.kinvey.com/blog/item/61-kinvey-adds-cross-origin-resource-sharing-cors
mail-archive[.com]/c-user#axis.apache.org/msg00790.html (not allowed to post more links)
Unfortunately, the "solution" is only working on Firefox and not Chrome. Chrome simply shows the request in red, but doesn't give me any more info on why it failed.
Edit 2: Fixed on Chrome: The server I was trying to get data from had a security certificate which was not trusted. The preflight request on Chrome failed because of this. Solution
superuser[.com]/questions/27268/how-do-i-disable-the-warning-chrome-gives-if-a-security-certificate-is-not-trust (not allowed to post more links)
Welp, now that I have enough rep a while later, I might as well answer this question and accept it.
When you attempt to send a GET json request to a server with headers, the browser first sends an OPTION request to make sure that you can access it. Unfortunately, this OPTION request cannot carry with it any authentication. This means that if you want to send a GET with auth, the server must allow an OPTION without auth. Once I did this, things started working.
Some examples available here may illustrate further how access control can be combined with CORS. Specifically the credentialed GET example. Access control requires that the request set the withCredentials flag to true on the XMLHttpRequest, and for the server handling the OPTIONS method to do two things:
Set Access-Control-Allow-Credentials: true
Not use a wildcard * in the Access-Control-Allow-Origin header. This has to be set to the origin exactly according to the MDN docs on HTTP access control (CORS).
Essentially, the thing processing the OPTIONS request needs to send back appropriate response headers so you can make that credentialed request.
In your question you stated that the service you are interacting with is returning Access-Control-Allow-Origin: *, which is not compatible with a credentialed cross-domain request. This needs to return the origin specifically.
The aforementioned MDN Http Access Control (CORS) documentation also links to the Server-Side Access Control documentation outlining how a server would potentially respond to various cross domain requests - including handling a cross domain credentialed POST request that requires you to send back the correct headers in response to the OPTIONS method. You can find that example here.
Why don't you try typing the URL you are fetching the JSON from into your browser and seeing what happens. It sounds like you literally just need to authenticate into this other website to access it.
If your site needs to work in other browsers like IE, you WILL need JSONP, by the way. The security won't allow the cross site request to work. The headers won't change that. I believe you will also need to add a security policy in your headers.