I'm trying to create a fullscreen crossfade slideshow with bxslider, but one thing that I cannot complete.
There is space around images while the slideshow is going well.
I want to expand images entire window...
The slideshow is going well.
HTML
<head>
<meta charset="utf-8">
<link rel="stylesheet" href="css/style.css">
<title>Fading image slideshow</title>
<link rel="stylesheet" href="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/bxslider/4.2.12/jquery.bxslider.css">
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.1.1/jquery.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/bxslider/4.2.12/jquery.bxslider.min.js"></script>
</head>
<body>
<ul id="slider">
<li style="background-image: url(img01.jpg);"></li>
<li style="background-image: url(img02.jpg);"></li>
<li style="background-image: url(img03.jpg);"></li>
<li style="background-image: url(img04.jpg);"></li>
<li style="background-image: url(img05.jpg);"></li>
<li style="background-image: url(img06.jpg);"></li>
</ul>
<script>
$(function() {
$('#slider').bxSlider({
mode: 'fade',
speed: 2000,
pause: 8000,
auto: true,
pager: false,
controls: false,
touchEnabled: false
});
});
</script>
</body>
CSS
body {
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
}
.bx-viewport {
left: 0;
box-shadow: none;
border: none;
}
#slider li {
height: 100vh;
width: 100%;
background-position: center;
background-size: cover;
background-repeat: no-repeat;
}
I don't need any space, and I just want images to expand full screen size.
Hello Please check below css code add it to your css and then check please confirm me also.
ul#slider{margin: 0px;}
ul#slider li{left: 0px;}
.bx-wrapper{margin: 0px; border: 0px;}
Try to reset the default margin and padding by adding this styles:
ul#slider{
margin: 0;
padding: 0
}
Related
I'm trying to make analog of with images and videos using slick carousel in vue (nuxt). It works fine when images are the same width, but when width is different - speed seems to be unpredictable.
How to make sliders with different width go one after another with the same speed and no stop?
This is my example:
$(document).ready(function(){
$('.slider').slick({
slidesToShow: 3,
variableWidth: true,
cssEase: 'linear',
autoplay: true,
autoplaySpeed: 0,
speed: 1000
});
});
.wrapper {
border: 1px solid blue;
overflow: hidden;
}
.slider {
border: 1px solid red;
box-sizing: border-box;
}
.item {
box-sizing: border-box;
border: 1px solid red;
}
.item_300 {
width: 300px;
}
.item_500 {
width: 500px;
}
.item_600 {
width: 600px;
}
.item_200 {
width: 200px;
}
<head>
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="//cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/kenwheeler/slick#1.8.1/slick/slick.css"/>
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="//cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/kenwheeler/slick#1.8.1/slick/slick-theme.css"/>
</head>
<section class="wrapper">
<div class="slider">
<div class="item item_300"><h3>1</h3></div>
<div class="item item_500"><h3>2</h3></div>
<div class="item item_300"><h3>3</h3></div>
<div class="item item_500"><h3>4</h3></div>
<div class="item item_300"><h3>5</h3></div>
<div class="item item_200"><h3>6</h3></div>
</div>
</section>
<script type="text/javascript" src="//code.jquery.com/jquery-1.11.0.min.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="//code.jquery.com/jquery-migrate-1.2.1.min.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="//cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/kenwheeler/slick#1.8.1/slick/slick.min.js"></script>
I'm practicing customizing bxSlider direction buttons.
As you can see, I changed .bx-controls-direction a's width & height to put different background images.
prev button works well, but next button seems weird. When I hover on it, it appears two different size same icons. How can I fix this?
the image is here: https://i.postimg.cc/5NdXKznk/2.png
HTML/JS:
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en">
<head>
<meta charset="UTF-8">
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0">
<title>bxSlider</title>
<link rel="stylesheet" href="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/bxslider/4.2.12/jquery.bxslider.css">
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.1.1/jquery.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/bxslider/4.2.12/jquery.bxslider.min.js"></script>
<link rel="stylesheet" href="./css/style.css">
</head>
<body>
<h1>my beautiful moments</h1>
<div class="slider">
<div class="slide"><img src="./img/a.jpg" alt=""></div>
<div class="slide"><img src="./img/b.jpg" alt=""></div>
<div class="slide"><img src="./img/c.jpg" alt=""></div>
<div class="slide"><img src="./img/d.jpg" alt=""></div>
<div class="slide"><img src="./img/e.jpg" alt=""></div>
<div class="slide"><img src="./img/f.jpg" alt=""></div>
</div>
<script>
$(document).ready(function() {
$('.slider').bxSlider({
mode: 'fade',
slideWidth: 500,
auto: true,
pause: 1800
});
});
</script>
</body>
</html>
CSS:
#import url('https://fonts.googleapis.com/css2?family=Open+Sans:wght#300;400;600&display=swap');
body {
font-family: 'Open Sans', sans-serif;
}
h1 {
text-align: center;
text-transform: uppercase;
}
.bx-wrapper {
box-shadow: none;
border: none;
margin: 1rem auto;
}
.bx-wrapper .bx-controls-direction a {
width: 90px;
height: 90px;
}
.bx-wrapper .bx-prev {
left: -10rem;
background: url('../img/arrow_t3_prev.png');
}
.bx-wrapper .bx-next {
background: url('../img/arrow_t3_next.png');
right: -10rem;
}
I figured it out myself.
I had to specify classes more in css.
CSS:
.bx-wrapper .bx-controls-direction .bx-prev {
background: url('../img/arrow_t3_prev.png') no-repeat;
left: -10rem;
}
.bx-wrapper .bx-controls-direction .bx-next {
background: url('../img/arrow_t3_next.png') no-repeat;
right: -10rem;
}
Now it works perfectly.
My question is how can i set full width and height background image for the header in Bootstrap like http://demo.evenfly.com/view?theme=SantaGo ( i am not expecting animations, i am expecting how to make background that fits in to screen like this)?
This is what i have done so far,
https://codepen.io/anon/pen/reYRBo
HTML:
<html lang="en">
<head>
<title>Bootstrap Example</title>
<meta charset="utf-8">
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1">
<link rel="stylesheet" href="http://maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com/bootstrap/3.3.6/css/bootstrap.min.css">
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.12.0/jquery.min.js"></script>
<script src="http://maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com/bootstrap/3.3.6/js/bootstrap.min.js"></script>
<link href="http://www.jqueryscript.net/css/jquerysctipttop.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css">
<link rel="stylesheet" href="sltac.css">
</head>
<body>
<header>
<div class="row">
<div class="bg-image" id="jumboid">
<img src="http://www.visitnorwich.co.uk/assets/Uploads/Events-images/Theatre-generic.jpg" class="img-responsive" alt="Cinque Terre" width="100%" height="40%" back>
</div>
</header>
</body>
</html>
CSS:
body{
margin:0;
padding:0;
width:100%;
}
#jumboid{
width:100% ;
}
.bg-image {
position: relative;
}
.bg-image img {
display: block;
width: 100%;
max-width: 1200px; /* corresponds to max height of 450px */
margin: 0 auto;
}
header{
width:100%;
height:100%;
height:calc(100% - 1px);
background-image:url('a.jpg');
background-size:cover;
}
At the end i'm expecting the result like this(if i take full page screen shot),
expected result
There is no need to use an extra image tag. Just set the background and the property background-size: cover
Try it like this:
html,
body {
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
}
header {
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
background: url(http://www.visitnorwich.co.uk/assets/Uploads/Events-images/Theatre-generic.jpg) center center no-repeat;
background-size: cover;
}
<body>
<header>
</header>
</body>
Do you have an img tag inside the #jumboid?
In case you don't, you can easily fix it with a background-image on #jumboid.
Edit the css as following:
#jumboid{
width:100% ;
height: 100vh;
background: url(http://www.visitnorwich.co.uk/assets/Uploads/Events-images/Theatre-generic.jpg);
background-size: cover;
background-repeat: no-repeat;
}
(forked) example: https://codepen.io/pimskie/pen/wGPOar
Simply use, using contain keeps your bg-img scalable and responsive-
background-size:contain;
OR if want to have a fixed header height and wan't to keep the image background scaled upto header's width-
background-size:100% 100%;
Hi try this code and Is this what you are looking for.
body {
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
width: 100%;
}
#jumboid {
width: 100%;
}
.bg-image {
position: relative;
background: url("http://www.visitnorwich.co.uk/assets/Uploads/Events-images/Theatre-generic.jpg") no-repeat center center /cover;
height: 450px;
background-attachment: fixed;
}
.bg-image img {
display: block;
width: 100%;
margin: 0 auto;
}
header {
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
height: calc(100% - 1px);
background-image: url('a.jpg');
background-size: cover;
}
<html lang="en">
<head>
<title>Bootstrap Example</title>
<meta charset="utf-8">
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1">
<link rel="stylesheet" href="http://maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com/bootstrap/3.3.6/css/bootstrap.min.css">
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.12.0/jquery.min.js"></script>
<script src="http://maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com/bootstrap/3.3.6/js/bootstrap.min.js"></script>
<link href="http://www.jqueryscript.net/css/jquerysctipttop.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css">
<link rel="stylesheet" href="sltac.css">
</head>
<body>
<header>
<div class="row">
<div class="bg-image" id="jumboid">
</div>
</div>
</header>
<div class="restofthecontent">
<p>your content</p>
</div>
</body>
</html>
Put your image in background of DIV by css not in <img> tag.
and give that DIV below CSS.
.Your_DV {
background-image: url(http://www.visitnorwich.co.uk/assets/Uploads/Events-images/Theatre-generic.jpg);
background-position: fixed;
background-size: cover;
background-repeat: no-repeat;
}
i want to use wow.js on my website. I got a sidebar which needs to have the content inside a container with overflow-x: auto;. Because of this wow.js does not work.
Is it possible to define in wow.js the scrolling container?
My site looks like this:
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head lang="en">
<meta charset="UTF-8">
<title></title>
<script src="//code.jquery.com/jquery-1.11.3.min.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="lib/js/wow.js"></script>
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="lib/css/animate.css">
<script>
$("document").ready(function() {
new WOW().init();
})
</script>
<style>
body,html {
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
height: 100%;
width: 100%;
}
#container {
height: 100%;
width: 100%;
position: relative;
}
#menu {
position: absolute;
width: 300px;
left: -300px;
background: red;
}
#content {
position: absolute;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
background: green;
overflow-x: auto;
}
.wow {
background: yellow;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<div id="container">
<nav id="menu">
<ul>
<li>sidebar1</li>
<li>sidebar2</li>
<li>sidebar3</li>
</ul>
</nav>
<div id="content">
contentcontent<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br>content<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br>content<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br>content<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><div class="wow bounce">text</div>content<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br>
</div>
</div>
</body>
<script>
</script>
</html>
Problem solved:
I've changed the Contentcontainer to a section and used this code to init wow.js
var wow = new WOW({ scrollContainer: "section"});
wow.init();
Thanks anyway
I would like to use the very excellent texteditor CodeMirror in fullscreen mode in a browser window and I would like to add a fixed header for some kind of menu - or at least space for a few buttons with some functionality.
So I've added a div with "position: fixed" to the top and added a padding-top to the div with the codemirror object. The problem comes up, when there's enough text that scrolling happens. After moving the cursor down/scrolling the content up and moving the cursor up again, the cursor goes behind the div but the content doesn't scroll fully down. Cursor is hidden, I cannot see the content. Only scrolling via scrollbar works.
Do I need to change the html/css with the fixed div?
Or do I need to check whether the cursor comes behind/under the div and I have to let CodeMirror scroll manually? I tried this but didn't manage to do it programmatically :-(
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<meta charset="UTF-8">
<link rel=stylesheet href="http://codemirror.net/doc/docs.css">
<link rel=stylesheet href="http://codemirror.net/lib/codemirror.css">
<script src=http://codemirror.net/lib/codemirror.js></script>
<script src=http://codemirror.net/mode/htmlmixed/htmlmixed.js></script>
<style type=text/css>
.CodeMirror {float: left; width: 100%; height: 100%; }
</style>
</head>
<body>
<div style="position: fixed; height: 28px; z-index:999; width: 100%; background: lightgray;">
<button>Some action</button>
</div>
<div style="padding-top: 23px">
<textarea id=content name="content"></textarea>
</div>
<script>
var editor = CodeMirror.fromTextArea(document.getElementById('content'), {
mode: 'application/x-httpd-php',
lineNumbers: true
});
</script>
</body>
</html>
check out here as well: http://jsfiddle.net/fxvef3bw/1/
I found a solution on my own.
Instead of two overlapping divs, I use two divs (non-overlapping), with style "position: absolute". They don't overlap, so scrolling is fine.
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<meta charset="UTF-8">
<link rel=stylesheet href="http://codemirror.net/doc/docs.css">
<link rel=stylesheet href="http://codemirror.net/lib/codemirror.css">
<script src=http://codemirror.net/lib/codemirror.js></script>
<script src=http://codemirror.net/mode/htmlmixed/htmlmixed.js></script>
<style type=text/css>
.CodeMirror {float: left; width: 100%; height: 100%; }
</style>
</head>
<body>
<div style="padding: 1px; position: absolute; margin: 0px; top: 0px; bottom: auto; left: 0px; right: 0px; width: auto; height: 24px; background: lightgrey;">
<button>some action</button>
</div>
<div style="padding: 1px; position: absolute; margin: 0px; left: 0px; right: 0px; top: 28px; bottom: 0px; width: auto; height: auto; ">
<textarea id="content" name="content" style="display: none;"></textarea>
</div>
<script>
var editor = CodeMirror.fromTextArea(document.getElementById('content'), {
mode: 'application/x-httpd-php',
lineNumbers: true
});
</script>
</body>
</html>
Updated jsfiddle is here: http://jsfiddle.net/fxvef3bw/2/
I hope I can get some comments about possible side effects or drawbacks of the position absolute. Otherwise it seems to be fine for me.