Wait for a newly opened window to close before continue - javascript

I'm using a loop with window.open inside it, and I'm looking for a way to wait for the previous window to be closed before launching the next one.
for(...){
window.open('index.html', '_blank', 'nodeIntegration=yes');

Simple for loop will not work. This can be achieved by setInterval.
Please refer the code below.
var MyWin = null;//window obejct will assign in future
var i = 0;//Strating index of loop
var len = 5;//length of loop
var myInterval = setInterval(function () {
if ((!MyWin || MyWin.closed) && i < len) {
MyWin = window.open("http://www.google.com/");
i++;
}
else if (i >= len) {
clearInterval(myInterval);//dont forget to clear interval
}
}, 100);

Related

Can't find the way to proper timeout or interval

I can't find the way to timeout or pause (tried for and counting to big numbers) click event. I use alert('x') to stop before $(arr[i-1]).click(); and then I have to press enter after that. But I want to automically pause after click event for about 300 ms.
javascript:
var arr = $("a.farm_icon_b");
var x = document.getElementById("plunder_list").rows;
var images;
for (var i = 0; i < x.length; i++) {
var z = x[i].id;
if (!!z) {
images = document.getElementById(String(z)).getElementsByTagName('img');
for (var j = 0; j < images.length; j++) {
if (!!images) {
if (images[j].src == "https://dspl.innogamescdn.com/8.116/36249/graphic/command/attack.png") {
if (images[j].tooltipText == "1 atak w drodze") {
alert('x');
$(arr[i - 1]).click();
} else if (images[j].tooltipText == "2 ataki w drodze") {
alert('y');
$(arr[i - 1]).click();
}
}
}
}
}
}
You can use javascript setTimeout function to hold or stop your script to execute for time as per your requirement. check this Link for more details. All the best.
setTimeout(function(){
$(arr[i - 1]).click();
}, 3000); // 3000 is stands for 3 second you can change it according to your requirementcode here
Important Note (thanks to #Thomas for highlighting this) This function doesn't "sleep" for 300ms, it freezes the page. The browser simply is stuck in that loop for 300ms and can't do anything untill this is over.
I think this is the function you are looking for. It will help you put a 300ms delay before the button clicks.
function pausecomp(millis)
{
var date = new Date();
var curDate = null;
do { curDate = new Date(); }
while(curDate-date < millis);
}
Source: http://userscripts-mirror.org/scripts/review/408779
Usage:
pausecomp(300); // Sleep for 300ms
$(arr[i - 1]).click();
Disclaimer:
Ideally, a setTimeout() based solution is the best approach for such problems in Javascript (as suggested by Akansh). However, a linear for-loop based approach will most likely not work for such a solution, and you will need to devise a callback functions based solution that relies on deferred execution.

Int from for loop not working in function - JS

I am pretty new to Javascript and have noticed this odd issue come up.
var dispatchMouseEvent = function(target, var_args) {
var e = document.createEvent("MouseEvents");
e.initEvent.apply(e, Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments, 1));
target.dispatchEvent(e);
};
var Level1Cats = document.getElementsByClassName("p-pstctgry-lnk-ctgry "); //GETTING LEVEL 1 CATS
var Level1CatsLen = Level1Cats.length; //GETTING LEVEL 1 CAT LEN
for (i = 0; i <= Level1CatsLen-1; i++) {
var ID1 = Level1Cats[i].id;
var temp1 = Level1Cats[i].innerHTML;
temp1.replace(/&/gi, "&").replace(/<[^>]*>/gi, "");
function GoToLevel2(callback) { //GO TO NEXT LEVEL!
dispatchMouseEvent(Level1Cats[i], "mouseover", true, true);
dispatchMouseEvent(Level1Cats[i], "click", true, true);
}
function GetLevel2() { //GET NEXT LEVEL
var Level2Cats = document.getElementsByClassName("p-pstctgry-lnk-ctgry");
return Level2Cats.length;
}
setTimeout(function() { //RUN IT WITH TIMING
GoToLevel2();
}, 100);
var Level2CatsLen = GetLevel2();
}
When the code is executed it gives me an error (Cannot read property 'dispatchEvent' of undefined)
I know this is because the i in the function does not seem to work. If I simply replace it with an int value of 1 it will execute and click cat 1, 16 times, as expected..
I would have thought this should work, any ideas how I can work around it?
Inside the loop, a closure GoToLevel2 is created, closing over the variable i, when i is 1. Then the loop runs through, i is incremented to 2, and the loop is terminated.
Then your setTimeout fires after 100ms, and invokes your closure. It still remembers that there was once a variable i, but it now contains 2. Level1Cats[2] is undefined, and you get an error.
The standard solution is to enclose the contents of the loop into another self-evaluating function that will not close over i:
for (i = 0; i <= Level1CatsLen-1; i++) {
(function(i) {
// ...
})(i);
}
(Note also that setTimeout(function() { GoToLevel2(); }, 200) is identical to, but less efficient than setTimeout(GoToLevel2, 200).)

Repeating a for loop by re-setting variable to 0

Why won't the below make the var i = 0 again and re-run through the loop?
for (var i = 0; i < menuitems.length; i++){
if (i == menuitems.length){
i = 0;
};
$(menuitems[i]).delay(3000*i).queue(function() {
$(this).trigger('click');
});
};
Because "i" will never be == to menuitems.length (in the body of the loop; it will be after the loop, of course). Your loop terminates as soon as "i" is not less than menuitems.length.
Because when i becomes menuitems.length, the for loop condition (i < menuitems.length) becomes false, so the loop stops.
Try this instead:
if (i == menuitems.length - 1){
But then, you'll need some way to make the loop stop; otherwise it will just keep going and freeze your browser.
This cannot work, because JavaScript code is not interruptible. Events like timer expirations will not be executed while you're inside the loop, so nobody from the outside will set an exit condition for you.
for (var i = 0;;i++)
{
i %= menuitems.length; // loops i when it exceeds list length
// the expiration of these delays will not interrupt the loop
$(menuitems[i]).delay(3000*i).queue(function() {
$(this).trigger('click');
});
// if you don't compute a break condition from within the loop, you're toast
if (some_break_condition) break;
}
Now if you want a scroller, the way to go is something like:
var timer;
var period = 1000; // milliseconds
function startScroll ()
{
stopScroll();
timer = window.setInterval(
move_something_around (), // do you scroll here
period);
}
function stopScroll ()
{
if (timer)
{
window.clearInterval(timer);
timer = null;
}
}
// html
<button type="button" onclick="startScroll()">Start</button>
<button type="button" onclick="stopScroll()" >Stop </button>
I ended up getting around this issue using the below code:
$('#scroll').click(function(){
setInterval(function(){
var u = 0;
document.getElementById('maps').setAttribute('src',myUrlArray[u]);
if(u < myUrlArray.length){
++u;
}else{
u = 0;
}
},3000);
});
My question ended up being very similar to this one:
JavaScript: Change iFrame src from Array

How to slow down a loop with setTimeout or setInterval

I have an array called RotatorNames. It contains random things but let's just say that it contains ["rotatorA","rotatorB","rotatorC"].
I want to loop through the array, and for each item i want to trigger a click event. I have got some of this working, except that the everything get's triggered instantly. How can i force the loop to wait a few seconds before it continues looping.
Here's what i have.
function Rotator() {
var RotatorNames = ["rotatorA","rotatorB","rotatorC"];
RotatorNames.forEach(function(entry){
window.setTimeout(function() {
//Trigger that elements button.
var elemntBtn = $('#btn_' + entry);
elemntBtn.trigger('click');
}, 5000);
});
}
You can run this to see what my issue is. http://jsfiddle.net/BxDtp/
Also, sometimes the alerts do A,C,B instead of A,B,C.
While I'm sure the other answers work, I would prefer using this setup:
function rotator(arr) {
var iterator = function (index) {
if (index >= arr.length) {
index = 0;
}
console.log(arr[index]);
setTimeout(function () {
iterator(++index);
}, 1500);
};
iterator(0);
};
rotator(["rotatorA", "rotatorB", "rotatorC"]);
DEMO: http://jsfiddle.net/BxDtp/4/
It just seems more logical to me than trying to get the iterations to line up correctly by passing the "correct" value to setTimeout.
This allows for the array to be continually iterated over, in order. If you want it to stop after going through it once, change index = 0; to return;.
You can increase the timeout based on the current index:
RotatorNames.forEach(function(entry, i) {
window.setTimeout(function() {
//Trigger that elements button.
var elemntBtn = $('#btn_' + entry);
elemntBtn.trigger('click');
}, 5000 + (i * 1000)); // wait for 5 seconds + 1 more per element
});
Try:
var idx = 0;
function Rotator() {
var RotatorNames = ["rotatorA", "rotatorB", "rotatorC"];
setTimeout(function () {
console.log(RotatorNames[idx]);
idx = (idx<RotatorNames.length-1) ? idx+1:idx=0;
Rotator();
}, 5000);
}
Rotator();
jsFiddle example
(note that I used console.log instead of alert)
Something like this should do what you're after:
function Rotator(index){
var RotatorNames = ["rotatorA","rotatorB","rotatorC"];
index = (index === undefined ? 0 : index);
var $btn = $("#btn_"+RotatorNames[index]);
$btn.click();
if(RotatorNames[index+1]!==undefined){
window.setTimeout(function(){
Rotator(index+1);
}, 500);
}
}

How to stop all timeouts and intervals using javascript? [duplicate]

This question already has answers here:
javascript: Clear all timeouts?
(13 answers)
Closed 6 years ago.
I'm working on an ajax web appliation which contains many running timeouts and intervals. And now I need to clear all running timeouts and intervals sometimes. Is there a simple way to stop everything without need to store every timeout and interval ID and iterate through them and clear them?
Sometimes it's possible to save the timer Id / Handle to clear it later which would be the best solution. So this is a second best. But I wanted to give a better understanding of what's going on. It basically grabs the highest timer id and clears everything less than that. But it's also possible to clear other timers that you do not want to clear!
It is a little hackish, so be warned!
// Set a fake timeout to get the highest timeout id
var highestTimeoutId = setTimeout(";");
for (var i = 0 ; i < highestTimeoutId ; i++) {
clearTimeout(i);
}
Updated answer after reading the duplicate I closed this question with -
It works and tested in Chrome on OSX
// run something
var id1 = setInterval(function() { console.log("interval", new Date())}, 1000);
var id2 = setTimeout(function() { console.log("timeout 1", new Date())}, 2000);
var id3 = setTimeout(function() { console.log("timeout 2", new Date())}, 5000); // not run
setTimeout(function() { console.log("timeout 3", new Date())}, 6000); // not run
// this will kill all intervals and timeouts too in 3 seconds.
// Change 3000 to anything larger than 10
var killId = setTimeout(function() {
for (var i = killId; i > 0; i--) clearInterval(i)
}, 3000);
console.log(id1, id2, id3, killId); // the IDs set by the function I used
NOTE: Looked at window objects that had a typeof number - funnily enough IE assigns an 8 digit number, FF a single digit starting with 2
Here is a workaround.
window.timeoutList = new Array();
window.intervalList = new Array();
window.oldSetTimeout = window.setTimeout;
window.oldSetInterval = window.setInterval;
window.oldClearTimeout = window.clearTimeout;
window.oldClearInterval = window.clearInterval;
window.setTimeout = function(code, delay) {
var retval = window.oldSetTimeout(code, delay);
window.timeoutList.push(retval);
return retval;
};
window.clearTimeout = function(id) {
var ind = window.timeoutList.indexOf(id);
if(ind >= 0) {
window.timeoutList.splice(ind, 1);
}
var retval = window.oldClearTimeout(id);
return retval;
};
window.setInterval = function(code, delay) {
var retval = window.oldSetInterval(code, delay);
window.intervalList.push(retval);
return retval;
};
window.clearInterval = function(id) {
var ind = window.intervalList.indexOf(id);
if(ind >= 0) {
window.intervalList.splice(ind, 1);
}
var retval = window.oldClearInterval(id);
return retval;
};
window.clearAllTimeouts = function() {
for(var i in window.timeoutList) {
window.oldClearTimeout(window.timeoutList[i]);
}
window.timeoutList = new Array();
};
window.clearAllIntervals = function() {
for(var i in window.intervalList) {
window.oldClearInterval(window.intervalList[i]);
}
window.intervalList = new Array();
};
It works for set/clear timeout/interval functions called after these lines are executed. Try and see it works:
setInterval('console.log(\'a\')', 1000);
setInterval('console.log(\'b\')', 500);
setInterval('console.log(\'c\')', 750);
setTimeout('clearAllIntervals()', 10000);
Proxying does the magic.
var noofTimeOuts = setTimeout('');
for (var i = 0 ; i < noofTimeOuts ; i++) clearTimeout(i);
var max = setTimeout(function(){ /* Empty function */ },1);
for (var i = 1; i <= max ; i++) {
window.clearInterval(i);
window.clearTimeout(i);
if(window.mozCancelAnimationFrame)window.mozCancelAnimationFrame(i); // Firefox
}
There's nothing built-in, but it's pretty easy to blast through all currently outstanding deferred execution functions by calling this clearAll() function:
function clearAll() {
for (var i = setTimeout(function() {}, 0); i > 0; i--) {
window.clearInterval(i);
window.clearTimeout(i);
if (window.cancelAnimationFrame) window.cancelAnimationFrame(i);
}
}
If you are in charge of the page you run, and can wrap the native deferred execution functions in wrappers that do the house keeping for of course equip each setter function with a corresponding .clearAll() too:
(function(deferFunctions) {
for (var setter in deferFunctions) (function(setter, clearer) {
var ids = [];
var startFn = window[setter];
var clearFn = window[clearer];
function clear(id) {
var index = ids.indexOf(id);
if (index !== -1) ids.splice(index, 1);
return clearFn.apply(window, arguments);
}
function set() {
var id = startFn.apply(window, arguments);
ids.push(id);
return id;
}
set.clearAll = function() { ids.slice(0).forEach(clear); };
if (startFn && clearFn) {
window[setter] = set;
window[clearer] = clear;
}
})(setter, deferFunctions[setter]);
})(
{ setTimeout: 'clearTimeout'
, setInterval: 'clearInterval'
, requestAnimationFrame: 'cancelAnimationFrame'
});
To try that it works, you could then try doing this, for instance, which will remain silent, as none of the callbacks end up firing before they're cancelled again:
// Some example timers of all types:
requestAnimationFrame(console.error);
setInterval(console.info, 1000, 'interval');
setTimeout(alert, 0, 'timeout');
// Now you can clear all deferred functions
// by execution type, whenever you want to:
window.setTimeout.clearAll();
window.setInterval.clearAll();
window.requestAnimationFrame.clearAll();
A little hack added to Gokhan Ozturk's answer
If you are using third party libraries which uses Timeouts and Intervals then they will also be cleared, so I added one parameter to notify function that this interval is to be push'ed or not to array.
window.setTimeout = function(code, delay, toBeAdded) {
var retval = window.oldSetTimeout(code, delay);
var toBeAdded = toBeAdded || false;
if(toBeAdded) {
window.timeoutList.push(retval);
}
return retval;
};
... // likewise for all functions.
You might be better off creating a scheduler. Take a look at this approach by Nader Zeid:
https://www.onsip.com/blog/avoiding-javascript-settimeout-and-setinterval-problems
It's an approach that help create some determinacy (because "the time interval argument of each of those functions really only establishes that the given function will execute after at least that amount of time. So a timed event can miss its target by literally any amount of time.").
Specifically, to the question you raise here, you can easily add and remove functions from the queue. While this response is long after the question was raised, hopefully it's helpful to any who find themselves struggling with Timeouts and Intervals.
You cannot clear any timeouts and intervals you don't know about.
You'd need something like getTimeoutList which isn't in the DOM3 spec, or even planned, AFAIK.
The previous proxying trick is nice, but if you have a lot of timeouts and intervals, I would not fill the arrays with consecutive numbers [1,2,3....], but with intervals. For example, instead of having [1,2,3,7,8,9], you would have maybe something like ['1-3','7-9'] or [[1,3],[7,9]], as a memory optimization. Of course this trick is only suited if you have a lot of timeouts and intervals and also if you would not stop arbitrary intervals that often.

Categories

Resources