Develop Reference

hasPairsWithSum Google Interview Question

I solved this problem by iterating through the array then find the item when the sum equals to array[i] + item returning true otherwise returning false.
My Question is => How I can return the indices of those numbers that add up to sum not just true? Using the same code below:
function hasPairsWithSum(array,sum) {
for (let i = 0; i < array.length; i++) {
if (array.find((item) => {return sum === array[i] + item}
));
return true;
};
return false;
};
console.log(hasPairsWithSum([1,2,4,4],8))
Note: Time complexity must be less than O(n ^ 2).

JavaScript O(n) Solution.
function hasPairsWithSum(array, sum) {
const map = new Map ();
for(let i = 0; i < array.length; i++) {
let currVal = array[i];
if (map.has(currVal)) {
return [map.get(currVal),i]
}
// difference value = sum - current value
let diff = sum - currVal
map.set(diff,i)
}
};
console.log(hasPairsWithSum([2,2,4,4], 8))

Please refer this code.
function hasPairsWithSum(array,sum) {
let result = [];
for (let i = 0; i < array.length; i++) {
if (array.some((item, index) => {return i === index ? false : sum === array[i] + item}))
result.push(i);
};
return result;
};
console.log(hasPairsWithSum([1,2,4,4],8))
console.log(hasPairsWithSum([3,2,4],6))
console.log(hasPairsWithSum([0,4,3,0],0))

O(n) Soln ... using math concept a+b = n then if a is present in our array then need to find b = n - a is present or not ..
def hasPairsWithSum(array,sum):
d = {}
for i in range(len(array)):
if(array[i] in d):
d[array[i]].append(i)
else:
d[array[i]] = [i]
ans = []
for i in range(len(array)):
val = sum - array[i]
if(val in d):
if(d[val][0] == i):
if(len(d[val]) > 1):
ans.append((i,d[val][1]))
break
else:
continue
else:
ans.append((i,d[val][0]))
break
return ans
print(hasPairsWithSum([4, 4, 4, 4], 8))
O(nlogn) soln ....just store the index with elements .. then sort it by their values .. next step run a loop with complexity of O(n) [concept : Two pointers]
def hasPairsWithSum(array,sum):
arr = []
for i in range(len(array)):
arr.append((array[i],i))
arr.sort()
i = 0
j = len(array)-1
ans = []
while(i<j):
tmp_sum = arr[i][0] + arr[j][0]
if(tmp_sum == sum):
ans.append((arr[i][1] , arr[j][1]))
#add your logic if you want to find all possible indexes instead of break
break
elif(tmp_sum < sum):
i = i + 1
elif(tmp_sum > sum):
j = j - 1
return ans
print(hasPairsWithSum([1,2,4,4],8))
note : if you want to find all possible soln then these approaches will not work either add you own logic in while loop or another approach is use binary search with traversal on every element and store the indexes in set (worst case this will be O(n^2) as we have to find all possible values) Eg: [4,4,4,4,4,4] , sum = 8 and you want to print all possible indexes then we end up running it upto n^2 (why? reason: total possible solns. are 5+4+3+2+1 = n*(n-1)/2 ≈ n^2)

You have to iterate over the array elements checking at every iteration for every element of the array (except the last one) all the elements at the right of it like below:
function findIndexes(array, sum) {
const result = [];
for (let i = 0; i < array.length -1; ++i) {
for (let j = i + 1; j < array.length; ++j) {
if ((array[i] + array[j]) === sum) {
result.push([i, j]);
}
}
}
return result;
}
console.log(findIndexes([1, 2, 4, 4], 8));
console.log(findIndexes([3, 2, 4], 6));
Update:
It is possible to obtain a linear O(n) complexity using an auxiliary Map structure associating an integer value as key with as a value the list containing all the indexes of the elements in the array equal to the integer key like below:
function findIndexes(array, sum) {
const map = new Map();
const result = [];
for (let i = 0; i < array.length; ++i) {
const a = array[i];
const b = sum - a;
if (map.has(b)) {
for (const index of map.get(b)) {
result.push([index, i]);
}
}
const l = map.has(a) ? map.get(a) : [];
l.push(i);
map.set(a, l);
}
return result;
}
console.log(findIndexes([1, 2, 4, 4], 8));
console.log(findIndexes([3, 2, 4], 6));
console.log(findIndexes([1, 1, 1], 2));

Is there any any other way to find in array pair of numbers whose sum are k?

I have an array of integers and a number k. Is it necessary to determine whether there are two numbers in the array whose sum is k?
function findPairs(nums, k) {
var s = [];
var length = nums.length;
for (var i = 0; i < length; i++) {
if (s[nums[i]] === k - nums[i]) {
console.log(nums[i], k - nums[i])
return true;
} else {
s[k - nums[i]] = nums[i];
}
}
return false;
}
var nums = [10, 15, 3, 7]
var k = 17
console.log(findPairs(nums, k))
why my code is not working?

My guess is that you had a syntax error or forgot to actually declare a function, since the code in the current version of your question appears to work as expected.
As an aside, I would suggest using an object or a Set instead of an array to store the other pair, because for large values of k, your s array may consume a lot of memory on some JavaScript engines as a result.
function findPairs(nums, k) {
var s = {};
var length = nums.length;
for (var i = 0; i < length; i++) {
if (s[nums[i]] === k - nums[i]) {
console.log(nums[i], k - nums[i]);
return true;
}
s[k - nums[i]] = nums[i];
console.log(s); // see the lookup table after each iteration
}
return false;
}
var nums = [10, 15, 3, 7];
var k = 17;
console.log(findPairs(nums, k));

Functional solution
const findPairs = (nums, k) =>
nums
.flatMap((v, i, arr) => arr.slice(i + 1).map(w => [v, w]))
.filter(pair => pair[0] + pair[1] === k);
console.log(findPairs([1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6], 5));

How to return the first occurrence of repeated item in an array using for loop?

I am trying to build logic currently with arrays and data structure. I am trying to implement the logic using for loop
function getRepeatingNumber(arr) {
for (var i = 0; i < arr.length; i++) {
for (var j = i + 1; j < arr.length; j++) {
if (arr[i] === arr[j]) {
return arr[i];
}
}
}
return undefined;
}
getRepeatingNumber([2, 3, 6, 5, 2]);
the above function takes in array and returns a repeated item in the array so in the above case it will return 2. But what if I have an array something like this arr[2,3,3,6,5,2] in this case it should return 3 but as the outer loop has index [0] which is 2 as the reference it will return 2 as the answer.
How to implement a function that returns the first occurrence of the repeated item.

Instead of iterating with j in the part after i, iterate the part before i:
function getRepeatingNumber(arr){
for (var i = 1; i < arr.length; i++) {
for (var j = 0; j < i; j++) {
if (arr[i] === arr[j]) {
return arr[i];
}
}
}
}
console.log(getRepeatingNumber([2,3,3,6,5,2]));
Note that an explicit return undefined is not needed, that is the default behaviour already.
You could also use indexOf to shorten the code a bit:
function getRepeatingNumber(arr){
for (var i = 1; i < arr.length; i++) {
if (arr.indexOf(arr[i]) < i) {
return arr[i];
}
}
}
console.log(getRepeatingNumber([2,3,3,6,5,2]));
You could even decide to make use of find -- which will return undefined in case of no match (i.e. no duplicates in our case):
function getRepeatingNumber(arr){
return arr.find((a, i) => {
if (arr.indexOf(a) < i) {
return true;
}
});
}
console.log(getRepeatingNumber([2,3,3,6,5,2]));
If you do this for huge arrays, then it would become important to have a solution that runs with linear time complexity. In that case, a Set will be useful:
function getRepeatingNumber(arr){
var set = new Set;
return arr.find(a => {
if (set.has(a)) return true;
set.add(a);
});
}
console.log(getRepeatingNumber([2,3,3,6,5,2]));
And if you are into functions of functions, and one-liners, then:
const getRepeatingNumber = r=>(t=>r.find(a=>[t.has(a),t.add(a)][0]))(new Set);
console.log(getRepeatingNumber([2,3,3,6,5,2]));

You need a data structure to keep track of first occurring index.
My recommendation is to use an array to store all the index of repeating numbers. Sort the array in ascending order and return the item at first index from the array.
function getRepeatingNumber(arr){
var resultIndexArr = [];
var count = 0;
var flag = 0;
for(var i=0;i<arr.length;i++)
{
for(var j=i+1;j<arr.length;j++)
{
if(arr[i] === arr[j])
{
flag = 1;
resultIndexArr[count++] = j;
}
}
}
resultIndexArr.sort((a, b) => a - b);
var resultIndex = resultIndexArr[0];
if(flag === 1)
return arr[resultIndex];
else
return;
}
console.log(getRepeatingNumber([2,3,6,5,2])); // test case 1
console.log(getRepeatingNumber([2,3,3,6,5,2])); // test case 2
console.log(getRepeatingNumber([2,5,3,6,5,2])); // test case 3
This will return correct result, but this is not the best solution. The best solution is to store your items in an array, check for each iteration if the item already exists in your array, if it exists then just return that item.

as a javascript dev you should be comfortable wit functional programming & higher-order functions so check the doc to get more understanding of some useful functions: like filter - find - reduce - findIndex map ...
Documentation
Now to answer your question:
at first you should think by step :
Get the occurrence of an item in an array as function:
const arr = [2, 5, 6, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 2, 5, 2]
const res = arr.reduce((numberofOcc, item) => {
if (item === 2)
numberofOcc++
return numberofOcc
}, 0);
console.log(`result without function ${res}`);
/* so my function will be */
const occurenceFun = (num, arr) => {
return arr.reduce((numberofOcc, item) => {
if (item === num)
numberofOcc++
return numberofOcc
}, 0);
}
console.log(`result using my function ${occurenceFun(2, arr)}`);
Now i have this function so i can use it inside another function to get the higher occurrence i have in an array
const arr = [1, 2, 5, 6, 8, 7, 2, 2, 2, 10, 10, 2]
const occurenceFun = (num, arr) => {
return arr.reduce((numberofOcc, item) => {
if (item === num)
numberofOcc++
return numberofOcc
}, 0);
}
/*let's create our function*/
const maxOccurenceFun = arr => {
let max = 0;
arr.forEach(el => {
if (max < occurenceFun(el, arr)) {
max = el
}
})
return max;
}
console.log(`the max occurence in this array is : ${maxOccurenceFun(arr)}`);

Why is this function returns an empty array?

I just don't understand why does this function return an empty array instead of newArr = [1, 2, 3, etc.] depending on the length of the array.
function randomFunction(num) {
var newArr = [];
for(var i = 1; i < num.length; i++) {
newArr.push(i);
}
return newArr;
};

If num is supposed to be the length of the new array, and the last number of the range of values, you have to use it directly, instead of using length (which is meant to be used for an array):
function randomFunction(num) {
var newArr = [];
for(var i = 1; i <= num; i++) {
newArr.push(i);
}
return newArr;
};
var array = randomFunction(5);
console.log(array);
Also, you might want use <= instead of <, in case you want to start the value by 1 and go through n, and not n - 1.

function randomFunction(num) {
var newArr = [];
for(var i = 1; i < num /* number has no length */; i++) {
newArr.push(i);
}
return newArr;
};
Es6 alternative for fun:
return new Array(num).fill().map((r, i) => i)

randomFunction(8) ; for example
A number doesn't have length at all. It's already a value.
You do not need length attribute at all. just
for(var i = 1; i < num; i++) {
newArr.push(i);
}
function randomFunction(num) {
var newArr = [];
for (var i = 1; i < num; i++) {
newArr.push(i);
}
return newArr;
};
console.log(randomFunction(8))

num is already a number. You don't need use .lenght property
function randomFunction(num) {
var newArr = [];
for(var i = 1; i <= num; i++) {
newArr.push(i);
}
return newArr;
};
randomFunction(5); // [ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ]

Pair of elements from a specified array whose sum equals a specific target number

I am in mid of my JavaScript session. Find this code in my coding exercise. I understand the logic but I didn't get this map[nums[x]] condition.
function twoSum(nums, target_num) {
var map = [];
var indexnum = [];
for (var x = 0; x < nums.length; x++)
{
if (map[nums[x]] != null)
// what they meant by map[nums[x]]
{
index = map[nums[x]];
indexnum[0] = index+1;
indexnum[1] = x+1;
break;
}
else
{
map[target_num - nums[x]] = x;
}
}
return indexnum;
}
console.log(twoSum([10,20,10,40,50,60,70],50));
I am trying to get the Pair of elements from a specified array whose sum equals a specific target number. I have written below code.
function arraypair(array,sum){
for (i = 0;i < array.length;i++) {
var first = array[i];
for (j = i + 1;j < array.length;j++) {
var second = array[j];
if ((first + second) == sum) {
alert('First: ' + first + ' Second ' + second + ' SUM ' + sum);
console.log('First: ' + first + ' Second ' + second);
}
}
}
}
var a = [2, 4, 3, 5, 6, -2, 4, 7, 8, 9];
arraypair(a,7);
Is there any optimized way than above two solutions? Can some one explain the first solution what exactly map[nums[x]] this condition points to?

Using HashMap approach using time complexity approx O(n),below is the following code:
let twoSum = (array, sum) => {
let hashMap = {},
results = []
for (let i = 0; i < array.length; i++){
if (hashMap[array[i]]){
results.push([hashMap[array[i]], array[i]])
}else{
hashMap[sum - array[i]] = array[i];
}
}
return results;
}
console.log(twoSum([10,20,10,40,50,60,70,30],50));
result:
{[10, 40],[20, 30]}
I think the code is self explanatory ,even if you want help to understand it,let me know.I will be happy enough to for its explanation.
Hope it helps..

that map value you're seeing is a lookup table and that twoSum method has implemented what's called Dynamic Programming
In Dynamic Programming, you store values of your computations which you can re-use later on to find the solution.
Lets investigate how it works to better understand it:
twoSum([10,20,40,50,60,70], 50)
//I removed one of the duplicate 10s to make the example simpler
In iteration 0:
value is 10. Our target number is 50. When I see the number 10 in index 0, I make a note that if I ever find a 40 (50 - 10 = 40) in this list, then I can find its pair in index 0.
So in our map, 40 points to 0.
In iteration 2:
value is 40. I look at map my map to see I previously found a pair for 40.
map[nums[x]] (which is the same as map[40]) will return 0.
That means I have a pair for 40 at index 0.
0 and 2 make a pair.
Does that make any sense now?
Unlike in your solution where you have 2 nested loops, you can store previously computed values. This will save you processing time, but waste more space in the memory (because the lookup table will be needing the memory)
Also since you're writing this in javascript, your map can be an object instead of an array. It'll also make debugging a lot easier ;)

function twoSum(arr, S) {
const sum = [];
for(let i = 0; i< arr.length; i++) {
for(let j = i+1; j < arr.length; j++) {
if(S == arr[i] + arr[j]) sum.push([arr[i],arr[j]])
}
}
return sum
}
Brute Force not best way to solve but it works.

Please try the below code. It will give you all the unique pairs whose sum will be equal to the targetSum. It performs the binary search so will be better in performance. The time complexity of this solution is O(NLogN)
((arr,targetSum) => {
if ((arr && arr.length === 0) || targetSum === undefined) {
return false;
} else {
for (let x = 0; x <=arr.length -1; x++) {
let partnerInPair = targetSum - arr[x];
let start = x+1;
let end = (arr.length) - 2;
while(start <= end) {
let mid = parseInt(((start + end)/2));
if (arr[mid] === partnerInPair) {
console.log(`Pairs are ${arr[x]} and ${arr[mid]} `);
break;
} else if(partnerInPair < arr[mid]) {
end = mid - 1;
} else if(partnerInPair > arr[mid]) {
start = mid + 1;
}
}
};
};
})([0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9], 10)

function twoSum(arr, target) {
let res = [];
let indexes = [];
for (let i = 0; i < arr.length - 1; i++) {
for (let j = i + 1; j < arr.length; j++) {
if (target === arr[i] + arr[j] && !indexes.includes(i) && !indexes.includes(j)) {
res.push([arr[i], arr[j]]);
indexes.push(i);
indexes.push(j);
}
}
}
return res;
}
console.log('Result - ',
twoSum([1,2,3,4,5,6,6,6,6,6,6,6,6,6,7,8,9,10], 12)
);
Brute force.

const findTwoNum = ((arr, value) => {
let result = [];
for(let i= 0; i< arr.length-1; i++) {
if(arr[i] > value) {
continue;
}
if(arr.includes(value-arr[i])) {
result.push(arr[i]);
result.push(value-arr[i]);
break;;
}
}
return result;
});
let arr = [20,10,40,50,60,70,30];
const value = 120;
console.log(findTwoNum(arr, value));
OUTPUT : Array [50, 70]

function twoSum(arr){
let constant = 17;
for(let i=0;i<arr.length-2;i++){
for(let j=i+1;j<arr.length;j++){
if(arr[i]+arr[j] === constant){
console.log(arr[i],arr[j]);
}
}
}
}

let myArr = [2, 4, 3, 5, 7, 8, 9];
function getPair(arr, targetNum) {
for (let i = 0; i < arr.length; i++) {
let cNum = arr[i]; //my current number
for (let j = i; j < arr.length; j++) {
if (cNum !== arr[j] && cNum + arr[j] === targetNum) {
let pair = {};
pair.key1 = cNum;
pair.key2 = arr[j];
console.log(pair);
}
}
}
}
getPair(myArr, 7)

let sumArray = (arr,target) => {
let ar = []
arr.forEach((element,index) => {
console.log(index);
arr.forEach((element2, index2) => {
if( (index2 > index) && (element + element2 == target)){
ar.push({element, element2})
}
});
});
return ar
}
console.log(sumArray([8, 7, 2, 5, 3, 1],10))

Use {} hash object for storing and fast lookups.
Use simple for loop so you can return as soon as you find the right combo; array methods like .forEach() have to finish iterating no matter what.
And make sure you handle edges cases like this: twoSum([1,2,3,4], 8)---that should return undefined, but if you don't check for !== i (see below), you would erroneously return [4,4]. Think about why that is...
function twoSum(nums, target) {
const lookup = {};
for (let i = 0; i < nums.length; i++) {
const n = nums[i];
if (lookup[n] === undefined) {//lookup n; seen it before?
lookup[n] = i; //no, so add to dictionary with index as value
}
//seen target - n before? if so, is it different than n?
if (lookup[target - n] !== undefined && lookup[target - n] !== i) {
return [target - n, n];//yep, so we return our answer!
}
}
return undefined;//didn't find anything, so return undefined
}

We can fix this with simple JS object as well.
const twoSum = (arr, num) => {
let obj = {};
let res = [];
arr.map(item => {
let com = num - item;
if (obj[com]) {
res.push([obj[com], item]);
} else {
obj[item] = item;
}
});
return res;
};
console.log(twoSum([2, 3, 2, 5, 4, 9, 6, 8, 8, 7], 10));
// Output: [ [ 4, 6 ], [ 2, 8 ], [ 2, 8 ], [ 3, 7 ] ]

Solution In Java
Solution 1
public static int[] twoNumberSum(int[] array, int targetSum) {
for(int i=0;i<array.length;i++){
int first=array[i];
for(int j=i+1;j<array.length;j++){
int second=array[j];
if(first+second==targetSum){
return new int[]{first,second};
}
}
}
return new int[0];
}
Solution 2
public static int[] twoNumberSum(int[] array, int targetSum) {
Set<Integer> nums=new HashSet<Integer>();
for(int num:array){
int pmatch=targetSum-num;
if(nums.contains(pmatch)){
return new int[]{pmatch,num};
}else{
nums.add(num);
}
}
return new int[0];
}
Solution 3
public static int[] twoNumberSum(int[] array, int targetSum) {
Arrays.sort(array);
int left=0;
int right=array.length-1;
while(left<right){
int currentSum=array[left]+array[right];
if(currentSum==targetSum){
return new int[]{array[left],array[right]};
}else if(currentSum<targetSum){
left++;
}else if(currentSum>targetSum){
right--;
}
}
return new int[0];
}

function findPairOfNumbers(arr, targetSum) {
var low = 0, high = arr.length - 1, sum, result = [];
while(low < high) {
sum = arr[low] + arr[high];
if(sum < targetSum)
low++;
else if(sum > targetSum)
high--;
else if(sum === targetSum) {
result.push({val1: arr[low], val2: arr[high]});
high--;
}
}
return (result || false);
}
var pairs = findPairOfNumbers([1,2,3,4,4,5], 8);
if(pairs.length) {
console.log(pairs);
} else {
console.log("No pair of numbers found that sums to " + 8);
}

Simple Solution would be in javascript is:
var arr = [7,5,10,-5,9,14,45,77,5,3];
var arrLen = arr.length;
var sum = 15;
function findSumOfArrayInGiven (arr, arrLen, sum){
var left = 0;
var right = arrLen - 1;
// Sort Array in Ascending Order
arr = arr.sort(function(a, b) {
return a - b;
})
// Iterate Over
while(left < right){
if(arr[left] + arr[right] === sum){
return {
res : true,
matchNum: arr[left] + ' + ' + arr[right]
};
}else if(arr[left] + arr[right] < sum){
left++;
}else{
right--;
}
}
return 0;
}
var resp = findSumOfArrayInGiven (arr, arrLen, sum);
// Display Desired output
if(resp.res === true){
console.log('Matching Numbers are: ' + resp.matchNum +' = '+ sum);
}else{
console.log('There are no matching numbers of given sum');
}
Runtime test JSBin: https://jsbin.com/vuhitudebi/edit?js,console
Runtime test JSFiddle: https://jsfiddle.net/arbaazshaikh919/de0amjxt/4/

function sumOfTwo(array, sumNumber) {
for (i of array) {
for (j of array) {
if (i + j === sumNumber) {
console.log([i, j])
}
}
}
}
sumOfTwo([1, 2, 3], 4)

function twoSum(args , total) {
let obj = [];
let a = args.length;
for(let i = 0 ; i < a ; i++){
for(let j = 0; j < a ; j++){
if(args[i] + args[j] == total) {
obj.push([args[i] , args[j]])
}
}
}
console.log(obj)}
twoSum([10,20,10,40,50,60,70,30],60);
/* */