Await for Redux thunk in react lifecycle - javascript

I'd been working with React & Redux for some time when a work
colleague saw some code I wrote and commented on it.
SomeComponent.js
class SomeComponent extends Component {
async componentDidMount() {
await this.props.fetchPosts();
if (this.props.posts.length < 1)
return navigateTo( /* someOtherPlace */);
}
render() {
return (
<>
{this.props.posts.map(
(postData, i) => <Post key={i} {...postData}/>
)}
</>
);
}
}
const mapStateToProps = ({ posts }) => ({
posts: posts.list,
isFetching: posts.isFetching
});
export default connect(mapStateToProps, { fetchPosts })(SomeComponent);
actions/posts.js
export const fetchPosts = () => async dispatch => {
dispatch(requestPosts());
let posts;
try {
posts = (await api.get('/posts')).data
} catch (e) {
posts = e;
}
dispatch(receivePosts(posts));
}
He basically said that I shouldn't be awaiting for fetchPosts() action, instead I should just call it, and let it update props, re-render and perform the conditional navigation in componentDidUpdate which when he said it, it totally made sense to me.
But now I keep asking myself if what I was doing was really that bad, potencially buggy or just a bad practice that added more complexity.
He didn't mention the reasons why it was wrong other than it wasn't the React way of doing it.
EDIT: Added code snippet showing that the approach actually does work and doesn't perform faulty reads.

So there is small issue in your case
async componentDidMount() {
await this.props.fetchPosts();
if (this.props.posts.length < 1)
return navigateTo( /* someOtherPlace */);
}
Here await will wait till the fetchPosts is completed provided it returns a promise. Now fetchPosts will dispatch an action that will only result in the props being updated and another render triggered to update the posts in the component. So even if you wait for fetchPosts to complete the posts are not updated in the same render cycle and hence using this.props.posts.length won't return you the result corresponding to the latest posts update in redux store. The result being that you are unnecessarily waiting for the fetchPosts to complete and performing a check which will lead to a faulty result
Better approach is to work like
class SomeComponent extends Component {
componentDidMount() {
this.props.fetchPosts();
}
componentDidUpdate(prevProps) {
if(this.props.posts !== prevProps.posts && this.props.posts.length < 1) {
return navigateTo( /* someOtherPlace */);
}
}
render() {
return (
<>
{this.props.posts.map(
(postData, i) => <Post key={i} {...postData}/>
)}
</>
);
}
}

Related

Not able to figure out this error: Can't perform a React state update on an unmounted component [duplicate]

Problem
I am writing an application in React and was unable to avoid a super common pitfall, which is calling setState(...) after componentWillUnmount(...).
I looked very carefully at my code and tried to put some guarding clauses in place, but the problem persisted and I am still observing the warning.
Therefore, I've got two questions:
How do I figure out from the stack trace, which particular component and event handler or lifecycle hook is responsible for the rule violation?
Well, how to fix the problem itself, because my code was written with this pitfall in mind and is already trying to prevent it, but some underlying component's still generating the warning.
Browser console
Warning: Can't perform a React state update on an unmounted component.
This is a no-op, but it indicates a memory leak in your application.
To fix, cancel all subscriptions and asynchronous tasks in the componentWillUnmount
method.
in TextLayerInternal (created by Context.Consumer)
in TextLayer (created by PageInternal) index.js:1446
d/console[e]
index.js:1446
warningWithoutStack
react-dom.development.js:520
warnAboutUpdateOnUnmounted
react-dom.development.js:18238
scheduleWork
react-dom.development.js:19684
enqueueSetState
react-dom.development.js:12936
./node_modules/react/cjs/react.development.js/Component.prototype.setState
react.development.js:356
_callee$
TextLayer.js:97
tryCatch
runtime.js:63
invoke
runtime.js:282
defineIteratorMethods/</prototype[method]
runtime.js:116
asyncGeneratorStep
asyncToGenerator.js:3
_throw
asyncToGenerator.js:29
Code
Book.tsx
import { throttle } from 'lodash';
import * as React from 'react';
import { AutoWidthPdf } from '../shared/AutoWidthPdf';
import BookCommandPanel from '../shared/BookCommandPanel';
import BookTextPath from '../static/pdf/sde.pdf';
import './Book.css';
const DEFAULT_WIDTH = 140;
class Book extends React.Component {
setDivSizeThrottleable: () => void;
pdfWrapper: HTMLDivElement | null = null;
isComponentMounted: boolean = false;
state = {
hidden: true,
pdfWidth: DEFAULT_WIDTH,
};
constructor(props: any) {
super(props);
this.setDivSizeThrottleable = throttle(
() => {
if (this.isComponentMounted) {
this.setState({
pdfWidth: this.pdfWrapper!.getBoundingClientRect().width - 5,
});
}
},
500,
);
}
componentDidMount = () => {
this.isComponentMounted = true;
this.setDivSizeThrottleable();
window.addEventListener("resize", this.setDivSizeThrottleable);
};
componentWillUnmount = () => {
this.isComponentMounted = false;
window.removeEventListener("resize", this.setDivSizeThrottleable);
};
render = () => (
<div className="Book">
{ this.state.hidden && <div className="Book__LoadNotification centered">Book is being loaded...</div> }
<div className={this.getPdfContentContainerClassName()}>
<BookCommandPanel
bookTextPath={BookTextPath}
/>
<div className="Book__PdfContent" ref={ref => this.pdfWrapper = ref}>
<AutoWidthPdf
file={BookTextPath}
width={this.state.pdfWidth}
onLoadSuccess={(_: any) => this.onDocumentComplete()}
/>
</div>
<BookCommandPanel
bookTextPath={BookTextPath}
/>
</div>
</div>
);
getPdfContentContainerClassName = () => this.state.hidden ? 'hidden' : '';
onDocumentComplete = () => {
try {
this.setState({ hidden: false });
this.setDivSizeThrottleable();
} catch (caughtError) {
console.warn({ caughtError });
}
};
}
export default Book;
AutoWidthPdf.tsx
import * as React from 'react';
import { Document, Page, pdfjs } from 'react-pdf';
pdfjs.GlobalWorkerOptions.workerSrc = `//cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/pdf.js/${pdfjs.version}/pdf.worker.js`;
interface IProps {
file: string;
width: number;
onLoadSuccess: (pdf: any) => void;
}
export class AutoWidthPdf extends React.Component<IProps> {
render = () => (
<Document
file={this.props.file}
onLoadSuccess={(_: any) => this.props.onLoadSuccess(_)}
>
<Page
pageNumber={1}
width={this.props.width}
/>
</Document>
);
}
Update 1: Cancel throttleable function (still no luck)
const DEFAULT_WIDTH = 140;
class Book extends React.Component {
setDivSizeThrottleable: ((() => void) & Cancelable) | undefined;
pdfWrapper: HTMLDivElement | null = null;
state = {
hidden: true,
pdfWidth: DEFAULT_WIDTH,
};
componentDidMount = () => {
this.setDivSizeThrottleable = throttle(
() => {
this.setState({
pdfWidth: this.pdfWrapper!.getBoundingClientRect().width - 5,
});
},
500,
);
this.setDivSizeThrottleable();
window.addEventListener("resize", this.setDivSizeThrottleable);
};
componentWillUnmount = () => {
window.removeEventListener("resize", this.setDivSizeThrottleable!);
this.setDivSizeThrottleable!.cancel();
this.setDivSizeThrottleable = undefined;
};
render = () => (
<div className="Book">
{ this.state.hidden && <div className="Book__LoadNotification centered">Book is being loaded...</div> }
<div className={this.getPdfContentContainerClassName()}>
<BookCommandPanel
BookTextPath={BookTextPath}
/>
<div className="Book__PdfContent" ref={ref => this.pdfWrapper = ref}>
<AutoWidthPdf
file={BookTextPath}
width={this.state.pdfWidth}
onLoadSuccess={(_: any) => this.onDocumentComplete()}
/>
</div>
<BookCommandPanel
BookTextPath={BookTextPath}
/>
</div>
</div>
);
getPdfContentContainerClassName = () => this.state.hidden ? 'hidden' : '';
onDocumentComplete = () => {
try {
this.setState({ hidden: false });
this.setDivSizeThrottleable!();
} catch (caughtError) {
console.warn({ caughtError });
}
};
}
export default Book;
Here is a React Hooks specific solution for
Error
Warning: Can't perform a React state update on an unmounted component.
Solution
You can declare let isMounted = true inside useEffect, which will be changed in the cleanup callback, as soon as the component is unmounted. Before state updates, you now check this variable conditionally:
useEffect(() => {
let isMounted = true; // note mutable flag
someAsyncOperation().then(data => {
if (isMounted) setState(data); // add conditional check
})
return () => { isMounted = false }; // cleanup toggles value, if unmounted
}, []); // adjust dependencies to your needs
const Parent = () => {
const [mounted, setMounted] = useState(true);
return (
<div>
Parent:
<button onClick={() => setMounted(!mounted)}>
{mounted ? "Unmount" : "Mount"} Child
</button>
{mounted && <Child />}
<p>
Unmount Child, while it is still loading. It won't set state later on,
so no error is triggered.
</p>
</div>
);
};
const Child = () => {
const [state, setState] = useState("loading (4 sec)...");
useEffect(() => {
let isMounted = true;
fetchData();
return () => {
isMounted = false;
};
// simulate some Web API fetching
function fetchData() {
setTimeout(() => {
// drop "if (isMounted)" to trigger error again
// (take IDE, doesn't work with stack snippet)
if (isMounted) setState("data fetched")
else console.log("aborted setState on unmounted component")
}, 4000);
}
}, []);
return <div>Child: {state}</div>;
};
ReactDOM.render(<Parent />, document.getElementById("root"));
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/react/16.13.0/umd/react.production.min.js" integrity="sha256-32Gmw5rBDXyMjg/73FgpukoTZdMrxuYW7tj8adbN8z4=" crossorigin="anonymous"></script>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/react-dom/16.13.0/umd/react-dom.production.min.js" integrity="sha256-bjQ42ac3EN0GqK40pC9gGi/YixvKyZ24qMP/9HiGW7w=" crossorigin="anonymous"></script>
<div id="root"></div>
<script>var { useReducer, useEffect, useState, useRef } = React</script>
Extension: Custom useAsync Hook
We can encapsulate all the boilerplate into a custom Hook, that automatically aborts async functions in case the component unmounts or dependency values have changed before:
function useAsync(asyncFn, onSuccess) {
useEffect(() => {
let isActive = true;
asyncFn().then(data => {
if (isActive) onSuccess(data);
});
return () => { isActive = false };
}, [asyncFn, onSuccess]);
}
// custom Hook for automatic abortion on unmount or dependency change
// You might add onFailure for promise errors as well.
function useAsync(asyncFn, onSuccess) {
useEffect(() => {
let isActive = true;
asyncFn().then(data => {
if (isActive) onSuccess(data)
else console.log("aborted setState on unmounted component")
});
return () => {
isActive = false;
};
}, [asyncFn, onSuccess]);
}
const Child = () => {
const [state, setState] = useState("loading (4 sec)...");
useAsync(simulateFetchData, setState);
return <div>Child: {state}</div>;
};
const Parent = () => {
const [mounted, setMounted] = useState(true);
return (
<div>
Parent:
<button onClick={() => setMounted(!mounted)}>
{mounted ? "Unmount" : "Mount"} Child
</button>
{mounted && <Child />}
<p>
Unmount Child, while it is still loading. It won't set state later on,
so no error is triggered.
</p>
</div>
);
};
const simulateFetchData = () => new Promise(
resolve => setTimeout(() => resolve("data fetched"), 4000));
ReactDOM.render(<Parent />, document.getElementById("root"));
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/react/16.13.0/umd/react.production.min.js" integrity="sha256-32Gmw5rBDXyMjg/73FgpukoTZdMrxuYW7tj8adbN8z4=" crossorigin="anonymous"></script>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/react-dom/16.13.0/umd/react-dom.production.min.js" integrity="sha256-bjQ42ac3EN0GqK40pC9gGi/YixvKyZ24qMP/9HiGW7w=" crossorigin="anonymous"></script>
<div id="root"></div>
<script>var { useReducer, useEffect, useState, useRef } = React</script>
More on effect cleanups: Overreacted: A Complete Guide to useEffect
To remove - Can't perform a React state update on an unmounted component warning, use componentDidMount method under a condition and make false that condition on componentWillUnmount method. For example : -
class Home extends Component {
_isMounted = false;
constructor(props) {
super(props);
this.state = {
news: [],
};
}
componentDidMount() {
this._isMounted = true;
ajaxVar
.get('https://domain')
.then(result => {
if (this._isMounted) {
this.setState({
news: result.data.hits,
});
}
});
}
componentWillUnmount() {
this._isMounted = false;
}
render() {
...
}
}
If above solutions dont work, try this and it works for me:
componentWillUnmount() {
// fix Warning: Can't perform a React state update on an unmounted component
this.setState = (state,callback)=>{
return;
};
}
There is a hook that's fairly common called useIsMounted that solves this problem (for functional components)...
import { useRef, useEffect } from 'react';
export function useIsMounted() {
const isMounted = useRef(false);
useEffect(() => {
isMounted.current = true;
return () => isMounted.current = false;
}, []);
return isMounted;
}
then in your functional component
function Book() {
const isMounted = useIsMounted();
...
useEffect(() => {
asyncOperation().then(data => {
if (isMounted.current) { setState(data); }
})
});
...
}
Checking if a component is mounted is actually an anti pattern as per React documentation. The solution to the setState warning is rather to leverage on the use of an AbortController:
useEffect(() => {
const abortController = new AbortController() // creating an AbortController
fetch(url, { signal: abortController.signal }) // passing the signal to the query
.then(data => {
setState(data) // if everything went well, set the state
})
.catch(error => {
if (error.name === 'AbortError') return // if the query has been aborted, do nothing
throw error
})
return () => {
abortController.abort() // stop the query by aborting on the AbortController on unmount
}
}, [])
For asynchronous operations that aren't based on the Fetch API, there still should be a way to cancel these asynchronous operations, and you should rather leverage these than just checking if a component is mounted. If you are building your own API, you can implement the AbortController API in it to handle it.
For more context, the check if a component is mounted is an anti pattern as React is checking internally if the component is mounted to display that warning. Doing the same check again is just a way to hide the warning, and there are some easier ways to hide them than adding this piece of code on a big part of a codebase.
Source: https://medium.com/doctolib/react-stop-checking-if-your-component-is-mounted-3bb2568a4934
I had this warning possibly because of calling setState from an effect hook (This is discussed in these 3 issues linked together).
Anyway, upgrading the react version removed the warning.
React already removed this warning
but here is a better solution (not just workaround)
useEffect(() => {
const abortController = new AbortController() // creating an AbortController
fetch(url, { signal: abortController.signal }) // passing the signal to the query
.then(data => {
setState(data) // if everything went well, set the state
})
.catch(error => {
if (error.name === 'AbortError') return // if the query has been aborted, do nothing
throw error
})
return () => {
abortController.abort()
}
}, [])
The solution from #ford04 didn't worked to me and specially if you need to use the isMounted in multiple places (multiple useEffect for instance), it's recommended to useRef, as bellow:
Essential packages
"dependencies":
{
"react": "17.0.1",
}
"devDependencies": {
"typescript": "4.1.5",
}
My Hook Component
export const SubscriptionsView: React.FC = () => {
const [data, setData] = useState<Subscription[]>();
const isMounted = React.useRef(true);
React.useEffect(() => {
if (isMounted.current) {
// fetch data
// setData (fetch result)
return () => {
isMounted.current = false;
};
}
}
});
try changing setDivSizeThrottleable to
this.setDivSizeThrottleable = throttle(
() => {
if (this.isComponentMounted) {
this.setState({
pdfWidth: this.pdfWrapper!.getBoundingClientRect().width - 5,
});
}
},
500,
{ leading: false, trailing: true }
);
I know that you're not using history, but in my case I was using the useHistory hook from React Router DOM, which unmounts the component before the state is persisted in my React Context Provider.
To fix this problem I have used the hook withRouter nesting the component, in my case export default withRouter(Login), and inside the component const Login = props => { ...; props.history.push("/dashboard"); .... I have also removed the other props.history.push from the component, e.g, if(authorization.token) return props.history.push('/dashboard') because this causes a loop, because the authorization state.
An alternative to push a new item to history.
Add a ref to a jsx component and then check it exist
function Book() {
const ref = useRef();
useEffect(() => {
asyncOperation().then(data => {
if (ref.current) setState(data);
})
});
return <div ref={ref}>content</div>
}
I had a similar issue thanks #ford04 helped me out.
However, another error occurred.
NB. I am using ReactJS hooks
ndex.js:1 Warning: Cannot update during an existing state transition (such as within `render`). Render methods should be a pure function of props and state.
What causes the error?
import {useHistory} from 'react-router-dom'
const History = useHistory()
if (true) {
history.push('/new-route');
}
return (
<>
<render component />
</>
)
This could not work because despite you are redirecting to new page all state and props are being manipulated on the dom or simply rendering to the previous page did not stop.
What solution I found
import {Redirect} from 'react-router-dom'
if (true) {
return <redirect to="/new-route" />
}
return (
<>
<render component />
</>
)
If you are fetching data from axios and the error still occurs, just wrap the setter inside the condition
let isRendered = useRef(false);
useEffect(() => {
isRendered = true;
axios
.get("/sample/api")
.then(res => {
if (isRendered) {
setState(res.data);
}
return null;
})
.catch(err => console.log(err));
return () => {
isRendered = false;
};
}, []);
I have 2 solutions for this error:
return:
If you are used hook and useEffect, So put a return end of useEffect.
useEffect(() => {
window.addEventListener('mousemove', logMouseMove)
return () => {
window.removeEventListener('mousemove', logMouseMove)
}
}, [])
componentWillUnmount:
If you are used componentDidMount, So put componentWillUnmount next to it.
componentDidMount() {
window.addEventListener('mousemove', this.logMouseMove)
}
componentWillUnmount() {
window.removeEventListener('mousemove', this.logMouseMove)
}
The isMounted approach is an anti-pattern in most cases because it doesn't actually clean up/cancel anything, it just avoids changing state on unmounted components, but does nothing with pending asynchronous tasks. The React team recently removed the leak warning because users keep creating a lot of anti-patterns to hide the warning rather than fix its cause.
But writing cancellable code in plain JS can be really tricky. To fix this I made my own lib useAsyncEffect2 with custom hooks, built on top of a cancellable promise (c-promise2) for executing cancellable async code to reach its graceful cancellation. All async stages (promises), including deep ones, are cancellable. This means that the request here will be automatically aborted if its parent context is canceled. Of course, any other asynchronous operation can be used instead of a request.
useAsyncEffect Demo with plain useState usage (Live Demo):
import React, { useState } from "react";
import { useAsyncEffect } from "use-async-effect2";
import cpAxios from "cp-axios";
function TestComponent({url}) {
const [text, setText] = useState("");
const cancel = useAsyncEffect(
function* () {
setText("fetching...");
const json = (yield cpAxios(url)).data;
setText(`Success: ${JSON.stringify(json)}`);
},
[url]
);
return (
<div>
<div>{text}</div>
<button onClick={cancel}>
Cancel request
</button>
</div>
);
}
useAsyncEffect Demo with internal states usage (Live Demo):
import React from "react";
import { useAsyncEffect } from "use-async-effect2";
import cpAxios from "cp-axios";
function TestComponent({ url, timeout }) {
const [cancel, done, result, err] = useAsyncEffect(
function* () {
return (yield cpAxios(url).timeout(timeout)).data;
},
{ states: true, deps: [url] }
);
return (
<div>
{done ? (err ? err.toString() : JSON.stringify(result)) : "loading..."}
<button onClick={cancel} disabled={done}>
Cancel async effect (abort request)
</button>
</div>
);
}
Class component using decorators (Live demo)
import React, { Component } from "react";
import { ReactComponent } from "c-promise2";
import cpAxios from "cp-axios";
#ReactComponent
class TestComponent extends Component {
state = {
text: ""
};
*componentDidMount(scope) {
const { url, timeout } = this.props;
const response = yield cpAxios(url).timeout(timeout);
this.setState({ text: JSON.stringify(response.data, null, 2) });
}
render() {
return (<div>{this.state.text}</div>);
}
}
export default TestComponent;
More other examples:
Axios request with errors handling
Fetch weather by coords
Live search
Pause & Resume
Progress capturing
Edit: I just realized the warning is referencing a component called TextLayerInternal. That's likely where your bug is. The rest of this is still relevant, but it might not fix your problem.
1) Getting the instance of a component for this warning is tough. It looks like there is some discussion to improve this in React but there currently is no easy way to do it. The reason it hasn't been built yet, I suspect, is likely because components are expected to be written in such a way that setState after unmount isn't possible no matter what the state of the component is. The problem, as far as the React team is concerned, is always in the Component code and not the Component instance, which is why you get the Component Type name.
That answer might be unsatisfactory, but I think I can fix your problem.
2) Lodashes throttled function has a cancel method. Call cancel in componentWillUnmount and ditch the isComponentMounted. Canceling is more "idiomatically" React than introducing a new property.
UPDATE DO NOT USE MY ORIGINAL ANSWER AS IT DOES NOT WORK
This answer was based on the use of cancelable promises and a note in makecancelable which I migrated to use hooks. However, it appears it does not cancel a chain of async/await and even cancelable-promise does not support canceling of a chain of awaits
Doing a bit more research on this, it appears that some internal Google reasons prevented cancelable promises from coming into the standard.
Further more, there was some promise with Bluebird which introduces cancelable promises, but it does not work in Expo or at least I haven't seen an example of it working in Expo.
The accepted answer is the best. Since I use TypeScript I had adapted the code with a few modifications (I explicitly set the dependencies since the accepted answer's implicit dependencies appear to give a re-render loop on my app, added and use async/await rather than promise chain, pass a ref to the mounted object so that an async/await chain can be canceled earlier if needed)
/**
* This starts an async function and executes another function that performs
* React state changes if the component is still mounted after the async
* operation completes
* #template T
* #param {(mountedRef: React.MutableRefObject<boolean>) => Promise<T>} asyncFunction async function,
* it has a copy of the mounted ref so an await chain can be canceled earlier.
* #param {(asyncResult: T) => void} onSuccess this gets executed after async
* function is resolved and the component is still mounted
* #param {import("react").DependencyList} deps
*/
export function useAsyncSetEffect(asyncFunction, onSuccess, deps) {
const mountedRef = useRef(false);
useEffect(() => {
mountedRef.current = true;
(async () => {
const x = await asyncFunction(mountedRef);
if (mountedRef.current) {
onSuccess(x);
}
})();
return () => {
mountedRef.current = false;
};
}, deps);
}
Original answer
Since I have many different operations that are async, I use the cancelable-promise package to resolve this issue with minimal code changes.
Previous code:
useEffect(() =>
(async () => {
const bar = await fooAsync();
setSomeState(bar);
})(),
[]
);
New code:
import { cancelable } from "cancelable-promise";
...
useEffect(
() => {
const cancelablePromise = cancelable(async () => {
const bar = await fooAsync();
setSomeState(bar);
})
return () => cancelablePromise.cancel();
},
[]
);
You can alsowrpte it in a custom utility function like this
/**
* This wraps an async function in a cancelable promise
* #param {() => PromiseLike<void>} asyncFunction
* #param {React.DependencyList} deps
*/
export function useCancelableEffect(asyncFunction, deps) {
useEffect(() => {
const cancelablePromise = cancelable(asyncFunction());
return () => cancelablePromise.cancel();
}, deps);
}
In my case of a login-like screen, the fetch was done in a onClick handler of a parent component, who passed that handler down to the child, whom placed .catch and .finally on it.
In the .then case a redirect (and hence unmount) would happen as normal operation, and only in cases of fetch error would the child stay mounted on-screen.
My solution was moving the setState and all other code from the .finally to the .catch since the child is guaranteed to be mounted in the .catch case. And in the .then case nothing needed doing because of the guaranteed unmount.
Based on #ford04 answer, here is the same encapsulated in a method :
import React, { FC, useState, useEffect, DependencyList } from 'react';
export function useEffectAsync( effectAsyncFun : ( isMounted: () => boolean ) => unknown, deps?: DependencyList ) {
useEffect( () => {
let isMounted = true;
const _unused = effectAsyncFun( () => isMounted );
return () => { isMounted = false; };
}, deps );
}
Usage:
const MyComponent : FC<{}> = (props) => {
const [ asyncProp , setAsyncProp ] = useState( '' ) ;
useEffectAsync( async ( isMounted ) =>
{
const someAsyncProp = await ... ;
if ( isMounted() )
setAsyncProp( someAsyncProp ) ;
});
return <div> ... ;
} ;
Depending on how you open your webpage, you may not be causing a mounting. Such as using a <Link/> back to a page that was already mounted in the virtual DOM, so requiring data from a componentDidMount lifecycle is caught.
Here is a simple solution for this. This warning is due to when we do some fetch request while that request is in the background (because some requests take some time.)and we navigate back from that screen then they react cannot update the state. here is the example code for this. write this line before every state Update.
if(!isScreenMounted.current) return;
Here is the Complete Code
import React , {useRef} from 'react'
import { Text,StatusBar,SafeAreaView,ScrollView, StyleSheet } from 'react-native'
import BASEURL from '../constants/BaseURL';
const SearchScreen = () => {
const isScreenMounted = useRef(true)
useEffect(() => {
return () => isScreenMounted.current = false
},[])
const ConvertFileSubmit = () => {
if(!isScreenMounted.current) return;
setUpLoading(true)
var formdata = new FormData();
var file = {
uri: `file://${route.params.selectedfiles[0].uri}`,
type:`${route.params.selectedfiles[0].minetype}`,
name:`${route.params.selectedfiles[0].displayname}`,
};
formdata.append("file",file);
fetch(`${BASEURL}/UploadFile`, {
method: 'POST',
body: formdata,
redirect: 'manual'
}).then(response => response.json())
.then(result => {
if(!isScreenMounted.current) return;
setUpLoading(false)
}).catch(error => {
console.log('error', error)
});
}
return(
<>
<StatusBar barStyle="dark-content" />
<SafeAreaView>
<ScrollView
contentInsetAdjustmentBehavior="automatic"
style={styles.scrollView}>
<Text>Search Screen</Text>
</ScrollView>
</SafeAreaView>
</>
)
}
export default SearchScreen;
const styles = StyleSheet.create({
scrollView: {
backgroundColor:"red",
},
container:{
flex:1,
justifyContent:"center",
alignItems:"center"
}
})
I solved this problem by providing all the params that are used in the useEffect hook
The code reported the bug:
useEffect(() => {
getDistrict({
geonameid: countryId,
subdistrict: level,
}).then((res) => {
......
});
}, [countryId]);
The code after fix:
useEffect(() => {
getDistrict({
geonameid: countryId,
subdistrict: level,
}).then((res) => {
......
});
}, [countryId,level]);
Can see that , problems solved after I provided all the params(including the level param) that supposed to pass through.
I had a similar problem and solved it :
I was automatically making the user logged-in by dispatching an action on redux
( placing authentication token on redux state )
and then I was trying to show a message with this.setState({succ_message: "...")
in my component.
Component was looking empty with the same error on console : "unmounted component".."memory leak" etc.
After I read Walter's answer up in this thread
I've noticed that in the Routing table of my application ,
my component's route wasn't valid if user is logged-in :
{!this.props.user.token &&
<div>
<Route path="/register/:type" exact component={MyComp} />
</div>
}
I made the Route visible whether the token exists or not.
In my case the issue was that the parent component was hidding the child because of a condition change in the child component.
So what I did was to change the condition so the child component was always shown.
What was happening:
const ParentComponent:FC = () => {
...
if (someCondition) {
return null;
}
return (
<>
Some cool text here
<ChildModalComponent message="this is a cool modal" />
</>
)
}
const ChildModalComponent: FC = () => {
...
const handleSubmit = () => {
setSomeCondition(true);
}
}
So after clicking submit the modal was automatically hidden becasue of the parent condition (someCondition).
How did I fix it?
I changed the place where the someCondition was checked in the Parent component, so the child component was always shown:
const ParentComponent:FC = () => {
...
return (
<>
{!someCondition && <>Some cool text here</>
<ChildModalComponent message="this is a cool modal" />
</>
)
}
I faced same warning, not it is fixed. To fix the issue, I removed the useRef() variable check in useEffect()
Earlier, the code was
const varRef = useRef();
useEffect(() => {
if (!varRef.current)
{
}
}, []);
Now, the code is
const varRef = useRef();
useEffect(() => {
//if (!varRef.current)
{
}
}, [])
Hope, it helps...
Inspired by the accepted answer by #ford04 I had even better approach dealing with it, instead of using useEffect inside useAsync create a new function that returns a callback for componentWillUnmount :
function asyncRequest(asyncRequest, onSuccess, onError, onComplete) {
let isMounted=true
asyncRequest().then((data => isMounted ? onSuccess(data):null)).catch(onError).finally(onComplete)
return () => {isMounted=false}
}
...
useEffect(()=>{
return asyncRequest(()=>someAsyncTask(arg), response=> {
setSomeState(response)
},onError, onComplete)
},[])
const handleClick = async (item: NavheadersType, index: number) => {
const newNavHeaders = [...navheaders];
if (item.url) {
await router.push(item.url); =>>>> line causing error (causing route to happen)
// router.push(item.url); =>>> coreect line
newNavHeaders.forEach((item) => (item.active = false));
newNavHeaders[index].active = true;
setnavheaders([...newNavHeaders]);
}
};
The simplest and most compact solution (with an explanation) is seen below as a one-liner solution.
useEffect(() => { return () => {}; }, []);
The useEffect() example above returns a callback function triggers React to finish its unmount portion of its life-cycle prior to updating state.
That very simplistic solution is all that is needed. In addition, it also works unlike the fictional syntax provided by #ford04 and #sfletche . By the way, the below code snippet from #ford04 is purely imaginary syntax (#sfletche , #vinod , #guneetgstar , and #Drew Cordano used the very same imaginary syntax).
data => {       <--- Fictional/Imaginary Syntax
someAsyncOperation().then(data => {
if (isMounted) setState(data); // add conditional check
})
All of my linters and all the linters of my entire team will not accept it and they report Uncaught SyntaxError: unexpected token: '=>'. I am surprised that no one caught the imaginary syntax. Would anyone who has participated in this question-thread, particularly among the up-voters, explain to me how they got the solutions to work for them?
Inspired by #ford04 answer I use this hook, which also takes callbacks for success, errors, finally and an abortFn:
export const useAsync = (
asyncFn,
onSuccess = false,
onError = false,
onFinally = false,
abortFn = false
) => {
useEffect(() => {
let isMounted = true;
const run = async () => {
try{
let data = await asyncFn()
if (isMounted && onSuccess) onSuccess(data)
} catch(error) {
if (isMounted && onError) onSuccess(error)
} finally {
if (isMounted && onFinally) onFinally()
}
}
run()
return () => {
if(abortFn) abortFn()
isMounted = false
};
}, [asyncFn, onSuccess])
}
If the asyncFn is doing some kind of fetch from back-end it often makes sense to abort it when the component is unmounted (not always though, sometimes if ie. you're loading some data into a store you might as well just want to finish it even if component is unmounted)

Consuming Paginated API in React Component

I'm just getting started with React. As a simple exercise, I wanted to create some components for viewing data retrieved from the JsonMonk API. The API contains 83 user records and serves them in pages of 10.
I am trying to develop a component for viewing a list of users one page at a time which I called UserList. The code for it is below:
class UserList extends React.Component {
constructor(props) {
super(props);
this.state = {
pageNumber: 1,
users: [],
};
this.onPageNext = this.onPageNext.bind(this);
}
componentDidMount() {
this.fetchUsers(this.state.pageNumber)
.then((users) => this.setState({users: users}));
}
async fetchUsers(pageNumber) {
const response = await fetch(`https://jsonmonk.com/api/v1/users?page=${pageNumber}`);
const jsonResponse = await response.json();
return jsonResponse.data.records;
}
onPageNext() {
// ...
}
render() {
const postElements = this.state.users.map(
(props) => <User key={props._id} {...props} />);
return (
<div>
{postElements}
<div>
<button onClick={this.onPageNext}>Next</button>
</div>
</div>
);
}
}
The problem I am having pertains to the onPageNext method of my component. When the user clicks the "Next" button, I want to make a fetch for the next page of data and update the list.
My first attempt used an asynchronous arrow function passed to setState like so:
onPageNext() {
this.setState(async (state, props) => {
const nextPageNumber = state.pageNumber + 1;
const users = await this.fetchUsers(nextPageNumber);
return {pageNumber: nextPageNumber, users: users}
})
}
However, it does not seem React supports this behavior because the state is never updated.
Next, I tried to use promise .then syntax like so:
onPageNext() {
const nextPageNumber = this.state.pageNumber + 1;
this.fetchUsers(nextPageNumber)
.then((users) => this.setState({pageNumber: nextPageNumber, users: users}));
}
This works but the problem here is that I am accessing the class's state directly and not through setState's argument so I may receive an incorrect value. Say the user clicks the "Next" button three times quickly, they may not advance three pages.
I have essentially run into a chicken-or-the-egg type problem. I need to pass a callback to setState but I need to know the next page ID to fetch the data which requires calling setState. After studying the docs, I feel like the solution is moving the fetch logic out of the UsersList component, but I'm not entirely sure how to attack it.
As always, any help is appreciated.
You need to change onPageNext as below:
onPageNext() {
this.setState( prevState => {
return {pageNumber: prevState.pageNumber + 1}
}, () =>{
this.fetchUsers(this.state.pageNumber).then(users => this.setState({users: users}) )
});
}
Here is the Complete Code:
import React from "react";
export default class UserList extends React.Component {
constructor(props) {
super(props);
this.state = {
pageNumber: 1,
users: [],
};
this.onPageNext = this.onPageNext.bind(this);
}
componentDidMount() {
this.fetchUsers(this.state.pageNumber)
.then((users) => {
console.log(users, 'users');
this.setState({users: users})
}
);
}
async fetchUsers(pageNumber) {
const response = await fetch(`https://jsonmonk.com/api/v1/users?page=${pageNumber}`);
const jsonResponse = await response.json();
return jsonResponse.data.records;
}
onPageNext() {
this.setState( prevState => {
return {pageNumber: prevState.pageNumber + 1}
}, () =>{
this.fetchUsers(this.state.pageNumber).then(users => this.setState({users: users}) )
});
}
render() {
const postElements = this.state.users.map(
(user) => <User key={user._id} {...user} />);
return (
<div>
{postElements}
<div>
<button onClick={this.onPageNext}>Next</button>
</div>
</div>
);
}
}
function User(props) {
return (
<div>
<div style={{padding: 5}}>Name: {props.first_name} {props.last_name}</div>
<div style={{padding: 5}}>Email: {props.email}</div>
<div style={{padding: 5}}>Phone: {props.mobile_no}</div>
<hr/>
</div>
);
}
Here is the Code Sandbox

Functional component is not rerendering after state is changed

I would like to ask why my component is not rerendering after my state is changed and I need to refresh it (switch between routes) to see changes. Well, the interesting fact is that the first time when I click the delete button page (component) does not rerender but after I switch routes and come back the item is deleted and when I try to delete other items, it gets deleted instantly not like the first time.
This is my code:
import React, {useEffect, useState} from 'react';
import ApiFactory from '../mock';
import Editor from '../Editor';
import ProductCard from '../components/product-card/product-card';
import ProductEdit from '../components/product-edit/product-edit';
export default function Admin() {
const [items, setItems]= useState([]);
useEffect(() => {
getProducts();
}, [items]);
function getProducts() {
ApiFactory.getInstance().get('/api/products')
.then((res) => {
if(res.status == 200) {
setItems(res.data);
}
})
.catch((error) => { console.log(error)})
}
function handleDelete (productId) {
ApiFactory.getInstance().delete(`/api/products/${productId}`)
.then(()=> getProducts()
);
}
return (
<>
{
items.map((item, index) => {
console.log(item.id)
return <>
<div key={index}>
<ProductCard product={item}></ProductCard>
<button onClick={() => handleDelete(item.id)}>Delete</button>
</div>
</>
})
}
</>
);
}
I am quite new in React can anybody explain why it happens and how can I fix it?
I believe it's because of how you have useEffect set up.
change the useEffect to only make the GET API call once (on initial load):
useEffect(() => {
getProducts();
}, []); // remove the dependency here. You may have made an infinite loop here.
const getProducts = () => {
ApiFactory.getInstance().get('/api/products')
.then((res) => {
if(res.status == 200) {
setItems(res.data);
}
})
.catch((error) => { console.log(error)})
}
If you confirmed that the API call is handling your errors / successes (are you getting non 200 status codes ? those may not be handled)
Add error catching to handleDelete to make sure this call works.
const handleDelete = (productId) => {
ApiFactory.getInstance().delete(`/api/products/${productId}`)
.then(getProducts())
).catch((error) => { console.log(error)})
}
You may additionally do as another user suggested and move even more logic away from the API calls (not required though) to have state locally and not re-fetch data from the API.

Infinite loop during useEffect and Reducer

I don't know why but I have infinite loop when fetching data in Redux operations.
I have an app with Redux and ReactJS.
This is my React component
const CustomersTable = (props) => {
useEffect( () => {
props.getAllCustomers()
}, []);
return <Table ...props.customers />
}
const mapStateToProps = (state) => ({
customers: state.customers,
})
const mapDispatchToProps = dispatch => ({
getAllCustomers: () => dispatch(getAllCustomers()),
})
export default connect(
mapStateToProps, mapDispatchToProps
)(CustomersTable);
This is getAllInvoices()
const fetchCustomers = async() => {
/**
* I fetch only documents with flag delete==false
*/
const snapshot = await firestore.collection("customers").where('deleted', '==', false).get()
let data = []
snapshot.forEach(doc => {
let d = doc.data();
d.id_db = doc.id
//...other
data.push(d)
})
return data
}
export const getAllCustomers = () =>
async (dispatch) => {
const customers = await fetchCustomers()
// I reset state becouse I wont duplicate inovices in tables
dispatch(actions.reset())
customers.map(customer => dispatch(
actions.fetch(customer)
))
}
And reducers
const customerReducer = (state = INITIAL_STATE, action) => {
switch (action.type) {
case types.FETCH_CUSTOMERS:
return {
...state, list: [...state.list, action.item]
}
case types.RESET_CUSTOMERS:
return {
...state, list: []
}
default:
return state
}
}
I expect that reducers RESET_CUSTOMERS and then FETCH_CUSTOMERS done job. But it still working in loop reset->customers.
I thought that is still rendered the component in useEffect but I think that hook is writing good.
I tested other reducers which are copy-pase reducers from Customers and they work well.
EDIT 1
#godsenal, thanks for your reply:
actions.js:
import types from './types'
const fetch = item => ({
type: types.FETCH_CUSTOMERS, item
})
const reset = item => ({
type: types.RESET_CUSTOMERS, item
})
export default {
fetch,
reset
}
As regards <Table /> it is AntDesign component (https://ant.design/components/table/). Without that, it looks the same.
EDIT 2
It is incredible. I copied all files from modules (customers) and paste into contracts directory. Then I changed all variables, functions, etc from customer to contract. Now it working (only contracts), but customers infinite loop. Maybe something disturbs in outside a structure.
EDIT 3
I found in app.js that in mapStateToProps I added customers to props. After remove (because I don't need it in root component) it began works fine. I suspect that fetch method in <CustomerTable /> affect the <App /> component and it render in a loop. I discovered that component isn't still updated in a loop, but its mounts and unmounts in a loop.
But still, I don't understand one thing. In <App />, I still have in mapStateToProps dispatching invoice from a store (the same case as customers) and in this case, everything works fine.

Setting state in getDetails() occurs infinite loop

this.state = {
data: [],
details: []
}
componentDidMount() {
this.getDetails()
this.getCountries()
}
getCountries() {
Utils.rest('POST', 'https:///api-spot-get-all', {
country: '',
windProbability: ''
}).then(async (r) => {
const data = await r.json();
this.setState({
data: data.result
})
}).catch(err => {
console.log(err.message);
});
}
`getDetails() {
return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
let details_list = [];
this.state.data.map(item => {
return (
Utils.rest('POST', 'https:///api-spot-get-details', {
spotId: item.id
})
.then(async (r) => {
const details_item = await r.json()
console.log(`Loaded ${details_list.length} item ...(of ${this.state.data.length})`);
if (details_list.length === this.state.data.length) {
await resolve(details_list)
}
details_list.push(details_item.result);
})
);
})
})
}`
render() {
return (
{
this.state.data.map((item, key) => {
return (
{item.id}
{item.id}
);
})
}
Here is my code. After first call I am receiving id and passing it as input to second call
I think this is happening because you're calling this.getCountries() in the render function. So the function is called in every render, that causes a new request that sets a new state, which will trigger a new render an so on, creating an infinite loop. So, if you delete the function calling from the render function it should work.
This is a basic example:
import React from "react";
import ReactDOM from "react-dom";
import "./styles.css";
function App() {
const myarray=[1,2,3,4,5]
const mytable=myarray.map((item,key)=>{return(
<table key={key}>
<tr><td>id</td><td>{item}</td></tr>
</table>)
})
return (
<div className="App">
<h1>Hello CodeSandbox</h1>
{mytable}
</div>
);
}
const rootElement = document.getElementById("root");
ReactDOM.render(<App />, rootElement);
You can create a const in the render and use after in return so you can tryin your code to do something like that:
render() {
const myComponent= this.state.data.map((item, key) => { return (
<div key={key}>
<span>{item.it}</span>
</div>
) });
return (
{myComponent}
)
}
I used and is just for example you can use what structor you want as in the first example I used table...
Please note that you are calling getDetails method in render. render is not a good place to add methods which modify the internal state. please check the react doc for additional details.
There are a lot of strange things there. First of all, getDetails returns a Promise, but the promise is not resolved anywhere. Its usage should be something like:
getDetails()
.then(data => {
// do something with the data
}, error => {
// manage here the error
}):
Also, this.state.data.map should be this.state.data.forEach and delete the return from inside, because you don't need to return anything outside
On the other hand, there's an issue with getCountries. Its name sais it's a GET, but the API call sends a POST.
After that's clarified, inside getDetails you're using the data retrieved in getCountries, so its call should be inside the request resolving inside getCountries or either change getCountries to a Promise and do something like:
this.getCountries()
.then(data => {
this.getDetails();
});
You don't care when the getDetails call ends, so it doesn't need to return a Promise.
And, in the end, the render function should look more like this:
render() {
return (
<div>
{this.state.data.map((item, key) =>
<div key={key}>{item.id} - {item.id}</div>
)}
</div>
)
}
After this it should work properly, more or less. I have to warn you, though. Probably you would need to do something easier to become familiar with React's flow and how to properly work with state and JS's asynchronous functions.

Categories

Resources