I am facing a problem during my development in javascript with Phaser. I try to call a method inside a method of a class but I have an error.
Here is my class :
import Enemy from '../classes/Enemy';
import Turret from '../classes/Turret';
import Bullet from '../classes/Bullet';
class GameScene extends Phaser.Scene {
constructor() {
super({
key: 'GameScene'
});
}
preload()
{
this.load.image('turret', './www/assets/tour_simple.png');
}
drawGrid(graphics)
{
graphics.lineStyle(1, 0x0000ff, 0.8);
for(var i = 0; i < 8; i++)
{
graphics.moveTo(0, i * 64);
graphics.lineTo(640, i * 64);
}
for(var j = 0; j < 10; j++)
{
graphics.moveTo(j * 64, 0);
graphics.lineTo(j * 64, 512);
}
graphics.strokePath();
}
canPlaceTurret(i, j)
{
return this.map[i][j] === 0;
}
placeTurret(pointer)
{
var i = Math.floor(pointer.y/64);
var j = Math.floor(pointer.x/64);
if(this.canPlaceTurret(i, j)) {
var turret = this.turrets.get();
if (turret)
{
turret.setActive(true);
turret.setVisible(true);
turret.place(i, j);
}
}
}
damageEnemy(enemy, bullet)
{
// only if both enemy and bullet are alive
if (enemy.active === true && bullet.active === true) {
// we remove the bullet right away
bullet.setActive(false);
bullet.setVisible(false);
//todo mettre dans une classe constante
var BULLET_DAMAGE = 25;
// decrease the enemy hp with BULLET_DAMAGE
enemy.receiveDamage(BULLET_DAMAGE);
}
}
create() {
this.add.text(200, 230, 'good!', { fill: '#0f0' });
var graphics = this.add.graphics();
this.map = [[ 0,-1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
[ 0,-1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
[ 0,-1,-1,-1,-1,-1,-1,-1, 0, 0],
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,-1, 0, 0],
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,-1, 0, 0],
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,-1, 0, 0],
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,-1, 0, 0],
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,-1, 0, 0]];
//TODO creer une classe qui dessine le path
// the path for our enemies
// parameters are the start x and y of our path
this.path = this.add.path(96, -32);
this.path.lineTo(96, 164);
this.path.lineTo(480, 164);
this.path.lineTo(480, 544);
graphics.lineStyle(3, 0xffffff, 1);
// visualize the path
this.path.draw(graphics);
this.enemies = this.physics.add.group({ classType: Enemy, runChildUpdate: true });
this.nextEnemy = 0;
var graphics = this.add.graphics();
this.drawGrid(graphics);
this.turrets = this.add.group({ classType: Turret, runChildUpdate: true });
this.input.on('pointerdown', this.placeTurret);
this.bullets = this.physics.add.group({ classType: Bullet, runChildUpdate: true });
this.physics.add.overlap(this.enemies, this.bullets, this.damageEnemy);
}
update(time, delta) {
if (time > this.nextEnemy)
{
var enemy = this.enemies.get();
console.log(enemy);
if (enemy)
{
enemy.setActive(true);
enemy.setVisible(true);
// place the enemy at the start of the path
enemy.startOnPath();
this.nextEnemy = time + 2000;
}
}
}
}
export default GameScene;
And an error occurs during my game :
TypeError: this.canPlaceTurret is not a function
The error is from the placeTurret method where I call the canPlaceTurret method.
I have tried some things like adding an attribute to my class : self = this; and call my function with self.canPlaceTurret but there is always the problem. I think it is a scope problem but I don't know how to solve that.
Another important information : we are using Webpack
Thanks for reading :).
Try replacing:
this.input.on('pointerdown', this.placeTurret);
with:
this.input.on('pointerdown', pointer => this.placeTurret(pointer));
(slighthy edited following your comment below)
Basically, when you pass your method as a callback, it becomes a simple function reference. When that function is called later, this won't refer to the class instance you're expecting, because it's no longer called in the context of your class.
By using the fat arrow syntax, you create a specific callback instead, and explicitly tells it to call the method in the context of the current (as in, at the time said callback is defined) this.
Alternatively, you can also do:
this.input.on('pointerdown', this.placeTurret.bind(this));
Instead of creating a new anonymous function, this takes your method as a reference (like it was doing to begin with) but manually binds the current this to it.
Please refer to this post for a more detailed explanation.
Won't it work without using the this keyword at all in your placeTurret() method when calling the canPlaceTurret()?
placeTurret(pointer)
{
var i = Math.floor(pointer.y/64);
var j = Math.floor(pointer.x/64);
if(canPlaceTurret(i, j)) {
var turret = this.turrets.get();
if (turret)
{
turret.setActive(true);
turret.setVisible(true);
turret.place(i, j);
}
}
}
Related
I got a 10 x 10 array with the following values:
[[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]];
In this 2D array, I have to randomly choose six values of 0, either horizontally or vertically (also random) and replace them with the value 6.
I've done this with the following code:
function tekenGrootstSchip(bord) {
rand = Math.floor((Math.random() * 10));
rand2 = Math.floor((Math.random() * 10));
directie = Math.floor((Math.random() * 2));
counter = 0;
if (directie == 0) {
for(y = rand2; y < 10; y++) {
if(counter < 6) {
bord[rand][y] = 6;
counter++;
}
}
for(y = rand2; y > 0; y--) {
if(counter < 6) {
bord[rand][y] = 6;
counter++;
}
}
} else {
for(x = rand; x < 10; x++) {
if(counter < 6) {
bord[x][rand2] = 6;
counter++;
}
}
for(x = rand; x > 0; x--) {
if(counter < 6) {
bord[x][rand2] = 6;
counter++;
}
}
}
}
After doing this for the value 6, I also have to do this for the value 4. The rules for value 4 are a bit different however. You can't place a 4 on a 6, neither can you place a 4 next to a 6. And the value 4 only takes four places (so 4x1, while a 6 is 6x1)
So if my randomly generated direction is horizontal, my bord[x-1][y], bord[x][y] and bord[x+1][y], with x and y initialized at the random value, with y going up to y+1, y+2, y+3, y+4 (4x1). All these values have to be checked against == 0, if true, replacing the zeroes with fours can be initialized otherwise not. If so, I have to generate a new [x][y] and check these conditions again until I can change four zeroes in my 2D array succesfully.
Although I have a general idea of implementing this, I would have a bug that, if for instance one null-value would be replaced with a four, but the one next to it can't be replaced since it's next to a != 0 value, I would be stuck with a "illegal" four.
If anyone could help me out in the right direction I would appreciate it.
feasibility
We can (trivially) show that whatever the 6 configuration chosen, we can always put the 4s.
Indeed, the maximal cover area of a 6 is 9 (a 3x3 square)
000
060
000
(we can't put a 4 in the border surrounding the 6).
So a bound for the maximal 6 configuration covered area is 6*9=54
000000xxxx
060060xxxx
000000xxxx
000000xxxx
060060xxxx
000000xxxx
000000xxxx
060060xxxx
000000xxxx
xxxxxxxxxx
and we can put as many 4 in the squares containing 'x' (which is way more than 4)
6-generation
Let's assume the board is indiced as follow:
0 1 2 3 ... 9
10 11 12 ... 19
...
90... 99
let x towards the bottom and y to the right
A square holding value id can be found at (x,y)=((id - id%10)/10, id%10) and reciprocally
id:(x,y)->x*10+y
So we will only consider numbers between 0 and 99 (since we can find back their associated position(x,y) in the grid)
I will use the copy-pasted below getRandomInt taken shamelessly from mdn
function getRandomInt(min, max) {
min = Math.ceil(min);
max = Math.floor(max);
return Math.floor(Math.random() * (max - min)) + min; //The maximum is exclusive and the minimum is inclusive
}
Finally we can draw between 0 and 99. If number already exists then discard it, otherwise take it
let indices = new Set
while(indices.size < 6){
let idx = getRandomInt(0,99)
if(!indices.has(idx)){
indices.add(idx)
}
}
return [...indices]
4-generation
We can apply the same stragy as before: draw a random number between 0 and 99 and discard it as long as it is not valid, until 4 valid positions are found
build the invalid set due to the 6 positionned
let invalids = new Set
indices.forEach(idx=>{
let [x,y] = [(idx - idx%10)/10, idx%10]
//add the adjacent squares
for(let i = -1; i<=1; ++i){
for(let j = -1; j<= 1; ++j){
if( 0<=x+i<10 && 0 <= y+j < 10){//if the cell in the board....
invalids.add( (x+i)*10 + y+j )
}
}
}
})
draw except from the invalid set
let out = []
while(out.length < 4){
let idx = getRandomInt(0,99)
if(!invalids.has(idx)){
invalids.add(idx)
out.push(idx)
}
}
return out
That approach may be not that efficient in worst case: we would have about 54% probability of drawing an invalid number!
We can thus consider an array of only the valid numbers, and draw from it
let valids = Array(100).fill(0).reduce((oks, x,i)=>{
if(invalids.has(i)) return oks
return oks.push(i),oks
},[])
//take numbers from that array
let out = []
for(let i = 0; i<4; ++i){
let idx = getRandomInt(0,valids.length)
//notice that here we take the elem from valids
//not just the idx from getRandomInt
out.push(valids[idx])
//and we takeout the element from valids
valids.splice(idx, 1);
}
return out
I have searched this for weeks but just can't find the right tutorial.
Lets say we have a canvas that is 800x800.
<canvas id='draw' width=800 height=800></canvas>
And we have a tile map(0 will be square barriers and 1 will be air).
var tileMap = [ [0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0],
[0,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,0],
[0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0]
]
How do I make the map scroll so that only 3x3 of the squares be seen whenever the player moves?
For example:
canvas screen--> [0,0,0]
[0,1,1] <-- just this part to be seen
[0,0,0]
when player moves:
canvas screen--> [0,0,0]
[1,1,1] <-- now this part will be seen
[0,0,0]
So how do I make the tile map move to give the illusion that the player is moving?
tileMap should not be modify instead you create some object that represents center of current view e.g. player and use it in your display function. Whenever you want to scroll you just move center of view.
var tileMap = [ [0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0],
[0,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,0],
[0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0]
]
var hero = {
position: {
x: 0,
y: 1
}
};
const air = 1;
const barrier = 0;
display(hero,tileMap);
// move player instead of scrolling data
// tileMap is untouched
hero.position.x += 3;
display(hero,tileMap);
// use player position to display only portion of map
function display(player,map) {
var result = [
"",
"",
""
];
for(var y = 0, i = player.position.y - 1; y < 3; i++,y++) {
if (i >= 0 && i < map.length) {
for(var x = 0, j = player.position.x - 1; x < 3; j++,x++) {
if ( j >= 0 && j < map[i].length) {
result[y] += map[i][j] + ",";
}
else {
// outside map only ait
result[y] += air+ ",";
}
}
}
else {
// outside map only ait
result[y] += air +","+ air +","+air+",";
}
}
console.log(result);
}
You did not explained how is your array correlated with your canvas and animations - therefore a clear guess is that you're concerned about your Arrays only.
You need a viewport Array viewMap dictated by the camera cam position and size values.
In the example below it's anchor is left/top (you might want to change the logic later to use center/center instead, up to you).
on keyboard event, change the camera x y position and prevent going out of map boundaries
Populate your viewMap array and print it:
var tileMap = [
[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
[0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0],
[0, 1, 4, 1, 1, 3, 3, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 8, 8, 1, 0],
[0, 6, 1, 1, 1, 3, 3, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 9, 9, 1, 0],
[0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0],
[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]
];
var cam = {
x: 0,
y: 0,
width: 3,
height: 3
};
// Create empty 2D viewMap of viewport
var viewMap = [];
for (var i = 0; i < cam.height; i++) viewMap[i] = new Array(cam.width);
function tileViewport() {
for (var y = 0; y < cam.height; y++)
for (var x = 0; x < cam.width; x++)
viewMap[y][x] = tileMap[y + cam.y][x + cam.x];
// PRINT
console.clear(); console.log(viewMap.map(a => a.join(" ")).join("\n"))
}
document.body.addEventListener("keydown", function(e) {
var key = e.which;
if( /^(37|38|39|40)$/.test(key) ) e.preventDefault(); // prevent browser default stuff
if (key === 38) --cam.y;
if (key === 40) ++cam.y;
if (key === 37) --cam.x;
if (key === 39) ++cam.x;
// Fix movement to tileMap area boundary
cam.y = Math.max(0, Math.min(cam.y, tileMap.length - cam.height));
cam.x = Math.max(0, Math.min(cam.x, tileMap[0].length - cam.width));
tileViewport();
});
// INITIALIZE
tileViewport();
Click here and user your keyboard arrows!
Now that the above works correctly you can:
Add logic for obstacles behavior by using the new viewMap Array
prefetch new tiles for your canvas,
animate the canvas depending on the movement
I'm trying to do a Tilemap system, so I went through a tutorial. Here's the code :
// Possible tile types
const TILE_TYPES = {
0: { name: 'Sea', color: 'lightBlue'},
1: { name: 'Land', color: 'wheat' },
2: { name: 'House', color: 'black'}
}
// Map tile data
let mapData = <?php echo $mapData ?>
/**
Tile class
*/
class Tile {
constructor (size, type, ctx) {
this.size = size
this.type = type
this.ctx = ctx
}
draw (x, y) {
// Store positions
const xPos = x * this.size
const yPos = y * this.size
// Draw tile
this.ctx.fillStyle = this.type.color
this.ctx.fillRect(xPos, yPos, this.size, this.size)
}
}
/**
Map class
*/
class Map {
constructor (selector, data, opts) {
this.canvas = document.getElementById(selector)
this.ctx = this.canvas.getContext('2d')
this.data = data
this.tileSize = opts.tileSize
}
}
/**
OrthogonalMap class
*/
class OrthogonalMap extends Map {
constructor (selector, data, opts) {
super(selector, data, opts)
this.draw()
}
draw () {
const numCols = this.data[0].length
const numRows = this.data.length
// Iterate through map data and draw each tile
for (let y = 0; y < numRows; y++) {
for (let x = 0; x < numCols; x++) {
// Get tile ID from map data
const tileId = this.data[y][x]
// Use tile ID to determine tile type from TILE_TYPES (i.e. Sea or Land)
const tileType = TILE_TYPES[tileId]
// Create tile instance and draw to our canvas
new Tile(this.tileSize, tileType, this.ctx).draw(x, y)
}
}
}
}
// Init canvas tile map on document ready
document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded', function () {
// Init orthogonal map
const map = new OrthogonalMap('orthogonal-map', mapData, { tileSize: 64 })
})
Here's the call :
<?php
$mapData = '[
[1, 1, 1, 1, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 2],
[1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1],
[1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0],
[1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0],
[1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
[1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
[1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1],
[1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1],
[1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1],
]';
include "" . $_SERVER['DOCUMENT_ROOT'] . "/includes/maptiles.php";
?>
<canvas id="orthogonal-map" class="canvas-map" width="704" height="576"> </canvas>
Here's my question : How can I replace the color by an image ?
My first bet would be to replace the 'color' attribute to the TILE_TYPES constant and to replace this.ctx.fillStyle by something like this.ctx.drawimage.
I'm a beginner in Javascript so I would love some explaination to your process if you have the time. Thanks !
Drawing the images on the canvas will be straightforward, however, there is a step you need to do before that requires explanation. You need to load the images and wait for them to be ready before starting executing the Javascript code. I'm going to show you the easiest way to achieve this, but there are other methods and this one has several problems. So, it is ok by now, but at some point you will learn the other ways to do it.
First, we will add at html image tags to load the images:
<img id="Sea" src="Sea.jpg">
<img id="Land" src="Land.jpg">
<img id="House" src="House.jpg">
<script>
...
The <script> is the start of your current code and with the ... I mean that the code continues there, you must not write the dots into your code.
If you check the result, you will see that they appear at the top of your page, on top of the canvas. We will now tell Javascript to wait for them to load and remove them from the top of the canvas:
First lets change this:
document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded', function () {
by this:
window.addEventListener('load', function () {
With what you had, you were waiting for the DOM content to be loaded to start the execution. With the new code, it will wait for everything to be loaded, including the DOM content and the images.
So, now lets create some references for the images:
const images = {};
window.addEventListener('load', function () {
images.Sea = document.getElementById("Sea");
images.Land = document.getElementById("Land");
images.House = document.getElementById("House");
...
And now, lets remove them from the top of the canvas:
const images = {};
window.addEventListener('load', function () {
images.Sea = document.getElementById("Sea");
images.Land = document.getElementById("Land");
images.House = document.getElementById("House");
images.Sea.parentNode.removeChild(images.Sea);
images.Land.parentNode.removeChild(images.Land);
images.House.parentNode.removeChild(images.House);
...
Now the only part missing is drawing them on the canvas. So, lets replace this:
// Draw tile
this.ctx.fillStyle = this.type.color
this.ctx.fillRect(xPos, yPos, this.size, this.size)
By this:
// Draw tile
this.ctx.drawImage(images[this.type.name], xPos, yPos);
I am trying to achieve following effect using css3 and javascript when we move mouse to center div (MouseOver effect)
I have created small library which accepts 3 arguments element,sourcePoints,destination points and returns css3D matrix and update element. here is my javascript code.
var BLEND = BLEND || {};
BLEND.Util = BLEND.Util || {};
function print(msg) {
console.log(msg);
}
BLEND.Util.VendorPrefix = "";
BLEND.Util.DetectVendorPrefix = function() {
var styles = window.getComputedStyle(document.documentElement, ''),
pre = (Array.prototype.slice.call(styles).join('').match(/-(moz|webkit|ms)-/) || (styles.OLink === '' && ['', 'o']))[1];
BLEND.Util.VendorPrefix = pre[0].toUpperCase() + pre.substr(1) + "Transform";
}
BLEND.Util.DetectVendorPrefix();
BLEND.TransformElement = function(elm, src, dest) {
var L = [[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0], [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0], [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0], [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0], [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]];
var R = [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0];
for (var i = 0; i < 4; i++) {
L[i] = [];
L[i][0] = L[i + 4][3] = src[i].x;
L[i][2] = L[i + 4][4] = src[i].y;
L[i][2] = L[i + 4][5] = 1;
L[i][3] = L[i][4] = L[i][5] = L[i + 4][0] = L[i + 4][3] = L[i + 4][2] = 0;
L[i][6] = -src[i].x * dest[i].x;
L[i][7] = -src[i].y * dest[i].x;
L[i + 4][6] = -src[i].x * dest[i].y;
L[i + 4][7] = -src[i].y * dest[i].y;
R[i] = dest[i].x;
R[i + 4] = dest[i].y;
}
var RM = [];
for (i = 0; i < R.length; i++) {
RM[i] = [R[i]];
}
var Left = Matrix.create(L);
var Right = Matrix.create(R);
var res = Matrix.calculate(Left, Right);
print (res);
if (BLEND.Util.VendorPrefix == 'WebkitTransform') {
var matrix3D = new CSSMatrix();
matrix3D.m11 = res.get(0,0);
matrix3D.m12 = res.get(3,0);
matrix3D.m13 = 0;
matrix3D.m14 = res.get(6,0);
matrix3D.m21 = res.get(1,0);
matrix3D.m22 = res.get(4,0);
matrix3D.m23 = 0;
matrix3D.m24 = res.get(7,0);
matrix3D.m31 = 0;
matrix3D.m32 = 0;
matrix3D.m33 = 1;
matrix3D.m34 = 0;
matrix3D.m41 = res.get(2,0);
matrix3D.m42 = res.get(5,0);
matrix3D.m43 = 0;
matrix3D.m44 = 1;
elm.style.webkitTransform = matrix3D;
} else {
if (BLEND.Util.VendorPrefix === "")
BLEND.Util.DetectVendorPrefix();
elm.style[BLEND.Util.VendorPrefix] = "matrix3d(" + res.get(0,0) + "," + res.get(3,0) + ", 0," + res.get(6,0) + "," + res.get(1,0) + "," + res.get(4,0) + ", 0," + res.get(7,0) + ",0, 0, 1, 0," + res.get(2,0) + "," + res.get(5,0) + ", 0, 1)";
}
}
UPDATE: Here is JSFiddle
I am calling TransformElement method for each of 9 div with proper source and destination coordinates. But its not working as expected. Please suggest the possible solution.
can we do it using three.js in anyway (just asking may be its silly idea)?
UPDATE: Can we do it with CSS3D renderer and Three.js.
Idea is to create plane and slice it in 3x3 grid and on mouse over of each face of plane we can scale that div upside and respectivly we have to scale others div according to current div? Is it possible?
I didn't try to use your library but here is my solution to your problem: http://codepen.io/bali_balo/pen/87b980a2acf722b1c9feb35f3fcb1c65/ (I used Haml and SCSS, you can see compiled code by clicking the little eye on the top right corner of each panel)
I used this article to write this code.
9 matrices are computed first (corresponding to the hovered tile and every surrounding ones), using numericjs and fomulas available on the article linked before. Then on mouseover these matrices are applied to the corresponding tiles. Here is the code to get the transform matrix knowing the locations of 4 points before and after transformation:
//from and to are arrays of 4 objects containing a property x and a property y
//describing the 4 points of the quadrilateral to transform
function getTransform(from, to)
{
var A = [], i;
for(i = 0; i < 4; i++)
{
A.push([from[i].x, from[i].y, 1, 0, 0, 0, -from[i].x * to[i].x, -from[i].y * to[i].x]);
A.push([0, 0, 0, from[i].x, from[i].y, 1, -from[i].x * to[i].y, -from[i].y * to[i].y]);
}
var b = [];
for(i = 0; i < 4; i++)
{
b.push(to[i].x);
b.push(to[i].y);
}
//Uses numericjs to solve matrices equations
//returns h knowing A and b where A.h = b
var h = numeric.solve(A, b);
//Column major representation
return [[h[0], h[3], 0, h[6]],
[h[1], h[4], 0, h[7]],
[ 0 , 0 , 1, 0 ],
[h[2], h[5], 0, 1 ]];
}
Note that, as mentionned in my code, if you want to animate transitions, you can't just use CSS (as it would just transition each number of the matrix, but this would rarely give an appropriate result). You could try doing it using javascript but it might be a bit slow (I didn't test it), because you could not cache matrices and would have to compute them at every frame.
I have a grid stored in a one-dimensional array. The grid can be of variable size. I now have different blocks (2x2,2x3,2x4,3x3,3x4,3x5, 4x4 and so forth).
How do I fill the grid in now? It can have unused spaces left in the end but what is the fastest way here without looping through the array over and over trying out sizes?
For instance with this 5x5 grid.
var g1 = [
0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
]
You could use a backtracking algorithm to solve this type of problem:
function process(var blockstate) {
if(gridIsFullOfBlocks(blockstate))
return true;
if(canPlaceBlock(blockstate)) {
blockstate = placeLargestBlock(blockstate);
return process(blockstate);
}
return false;
}
function fillBlocks(int size) {
var blockstate = new Array(size);
if(process(blockstate))
displayBlockstate(blockstate);
else
displayError(blockstate);
}