Im looking to merge/combine objects in an array each with a series of nested arrays. I want to merge the objects based on a specific key (here label[1]). I can use Lodash and unionBy to filter out dublicates by label[1], but how do i keep the values from the filtered items?
The array can look like this:
var arr = [{
"label": ['item', 'private'],
"values": [1, 2, 3]
},
{
"label": ['item', 'private'],
"values": [1, 2, 3, 6]
},
{
"label": ['item', 'work'],
"values": [1, 2, 8, 9]
},
{
"label": ['item', 'private'],
"values": [1, 2, 4, 5]
},
{
"label": ['item', 'school'],
"values": [1, 2, 7]
}
];
And the desired output is:
var arr = [{
"label": ["item", "private"],
"values": [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ]
}, {
"label": ["item", "work"],
"values": [1, 2, 8, 9]
}, {
"label": ["item", "school"],
"values": [1, 2, 7]
}]
Here's a sample which is only half way there.
var arr = [
{ label: ['item','private'], values: [1,2,3] },
{ label: ['item','private'], values: [1,2,3,6] },
{ label: ['item','work'], values: [1,2,8,9] },
{ label: ['item','private'], values: [1,2,4,5] },
{ label: ['item','school'], values: [1,2,7] }
];
var result = _.unionBy(arr, "label[1]");
console.log(result);
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.11/lodash.js"></script>
Any ideas?
Thanks
Lasse
I'd write:
const arr2 = _(arr)
.groupBy(obj => obj.label[1])
.values()
.map(objs => ({
label: objs[0].label,
values: _(objs).flatMap("values").uniq().value(),
}))
.value()
Not sure how to do this with lodash but I don't think unionBy is the method to do this anyway.
Here is how you can group by label using lodash and then reduce the groups into one value to merge the items of a group.
const arr = [{"label":["item","private"],"values":[1,2,3]},{"label":["item","private"],"values":[1,2,3,6]},{"label":["item","work"],"values":[1,2,8,9]},{"label":["item","private"],"values":[1,2,4,5]},{"label":["item","school"],"values":[1,2,7]}];
console.log(
Object.values(
_.groupBy(arr, (item) => item.label.join()),//use lodash group by
).map((
group, //now we have array of array of groups
) =>
group
.reduce((result, item) => ({
//reduce a group to one object
label: result.label, //set label
values: [
//set values with unique values of all items
...new Set(
(result.values || []).concat(item.values || []),
),
],
})),
),
);
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.11/lodash.js"></script>
You could also do something like this via lodash:
var arr = [{ "label": ['item', 'private'], "values": [1, 2, 3] }, { "label": ['item', 'private'], "values": [1, 2, 3, 6] }, { "label": ['item', 'work'], "values": [1, 2, 8, 9] }, { "label": ['item', 'private'], "values": [1, 2, 4, 5] }, { "label": ['item', 'school'], "values": [1, 2, 7] } ]
const merge = arr => _.reduce(arr, (r,c) => _.union(r, c.values), [])
const result = _(arr).groupBy('label')
.entries()
.reduce((r,[k,v]) => (r.push({ label: k.split(','), values: merge(v) }), r), [])
console.log(result)
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.10/lodash.min.js"></script>
The idea is first to group by via _.groupBy and then get the entries (via _.entries) so you can form the desired output via _.reduce. _.union we use to merge the values arrays as part of the final reduce.
Here is the ES6 implementation:
var arr = [{ "label": ['item', 'private'], "values": [1, 2, 3] }, { "label": ['item', 'private'], "values": [1, 2, 3, 6] }, { "label": ['item', 'work'], "values": [1, 2, 8, 9] }, { "label": ['item', 'private'], "values": [1, 2, 4, 5] }, { "label": ['item', 'school'], "values": [1, 2, 7] } ]
const mrg = arr => Array.from(new Set(arr.reduce((r,c) => [...r, ...c.values], [])))
const grp = (arr, k) => arr.reduce((r,c) => (r[c[k]] = [...r[c[k]] || [], c], r), {})
const result = Object.entries(grp(arr, 'label'))
.reduce((r,[k,v]) => (r.push({ label: k.split(','), values: mrg(v) }), r), [])
console.log(result)
Related
I have an array of nested regions that look like this:
Egypt
Zone 1
Tagamo3
Giza
Helwan
Fayoum
Zone 2
Gesr ElSuis
test
Delta
Mohandeseen
Down Town
The array itself:
[
{
"key": 10,
"title": "Egypt",
"parent_key": null,
"children": [
{
"key": 1,
"title": "Zone 1",
"parent_key": 10,
"children": [
{
"key": 3,
"title": "Tagamo3",
"parent_key": 1,
"children": []
},
{
"key": 7,
"title": "Giza",
"parent_key": 1,
"children": []
},
{
"key": 8,
"title": "Helwan",
"parent_key": 1,
"children": []
},
{
"key": 11,
"title": "Fayoum",
"parent_key": 1,
"children": []
}
]
},
{
"key": 2,
"title": "Zone 2",
"parent_key": 10,
"children": [
{
"key": 4,
"title": "Gesr ElSuis",
"parent_key": 2,
"children": [
{
"key": 12,
"title": "test",
"parent_key": 4,
"children": []
}
]
},
{
"key": 5,
"title": "Delta",
"parent_key": 2,
"children": []
},
{
"key": 6,
"title": "Mohandeseen",
"parent_key": 2,
"children": []
},
{
"key": 9,
"title": "Down Town",
"parent_key": 2,
"children": []
}
]
}
]
}
]
I want to return to the highest region in a given input
Examples:
input [7, 1, 10] should return [10] since 10 is Egypt parent of 1 and 7
input [1, 2] should return both [1, 2] since they are on the same level both Zone 1 and zone 2 located under Egypt
input [2, 3, 1] should return [2, 1] since they are on the same level and 3 removed because it's a child of 1
input [1, 4] should return [1, 4] since they are on different levels and no one parent to the other
First it helps to turn your tree structure into a map of descendant ids, recursively:
const descendantsMap = new Map<number, Set<number>>();
function walk(tree: Tree) {
const s: Set<number> = new Set();
descendantsMap.set(tree.key, s);
for (const t of tree.children) {
walk(t);
s.add(t.key);
descendantsMap.get(t.key)?.forEach(v => s.add(v));
}
}
arr.forEach(walk);
We are building up a Map from each key in your tree structure to a Set of the keys of its descendants. The walk() function is recursive, and we merge the descendants for the children of each node into the descendants for the current node.
Let's make sure it looks right:
console.log(descendantsMap);
/* Map (12) {
10 => Set (11) {1, 3, 7, 8, 11, 2, 4, 12, 5, 6, 9},
1 => Set (4) {3, 7, 8, 11},
3 => Set (0) {},
7 => Set (0) {},
8 => Set (0) {},
11 => Set (0) {},
2 => Set (5) {4, 12, 5, 6, 9},
4 => Set (1) {12},
12 => Set (0) {},
5 => Set (0) {},
6 => Set (0) {},
9 => Set (0) {}
} */
Yes. You can see how now we have a quick mapping from each key to the set of keys in its descendant subtree.
Now to get the "highest" entries in an array (I would call these the "shallowest" since they are closest to the root), we find all the descendants of all the elements in the array and then filter these out of the array:
const shallowest = (x: number[]): number[] => {
const descendants = new Set<number>();
for (const v of x) {
descendantsMap.get(v)?.forEach(i => descendants.add(i));
}
console.log(descendants); // just to understand what's happening
return x.filter(v => !descendants.has(v));
}
Let's test it:
console.log(shallowest([7, 1, 10]));
// descendants are {3, 7, 8, 11, 1, 2, 4, 12, 5, 6, 9}
// output [10]
console.log(shallowest([1, 2]));
// descendants are {3, 7, 8, 11, 4, 12, 5, 6, 9};
// output [1, 2]
console.log(shallowest([2, 3, 1]));
// descendants are {4, 12, 5, 6, 9, 3, 7, 8, 11};
// output [2, 1]
console.log(shallowest([1, 4]));
// descendants are {3, 7, 8, 11, 12};
// output [1, 4]
Looks good. You can see that shallowest([7, 1, 10]) first finds all the descendants of 7, 1, and 10, which is {3, 7, 8, 11, 1, 2, 4, 12, 5, 6, 9}, or everything except 10. So when we filter those out of [7, 1, 10] we are left with just 10. Similarly, shallowest([1, 2]) and shallowest([1, 4]) produce sets of descendants that don't overlap at all with the input, so the output is identical to the input. And with shallowest([2, 3, 1]), the list of descendants contains 3 but not 2 or 1, so the output is [2, 1].
Playground link to code
This is my 2nd attempt, thanks to jcalz for pointing out the error and his solution is neater than mine.
The function buildArray builds an array of objects in to the variable keyArray, the key is the element in the array to be searched and another array that's the path to that element (so key 7 will have a path of [10, 1, 7]).
We then filter keyArray to remove any elements that have a parent in the original search array.
Anyway, reading jcalz's solution, I've learnt about maps so my time's not been entirely wasted. Hope this helps in some way though.
console.log(search2([7, 1, 10], obj)); //returns [10]
console.log(search2([1,2], obj)); //returns [1,2]
console.log(search2([2,3,1], obj)); //returns [1,2]
console.log(search2([1,4], obj)); //returns [1,4]
function search2(search, obj) {
keyArray=[];
buildArray(obj);
return keyArray.filter((element)=> !element.path.some(e => search.includes(e))).map((e)=> e.key);
function buildArray(obj, path=[]) {
obj.forEach((element) =>{
if(search.includes(element.key)) {
keyArray.push({"key":element.key,"path":path});
}
buildArray(element.children,[...path,element.key]);
});
}
}
So I have this 2D permutations array of ints which looks like this:
arr = [
[ 5, 2, 6 ],
[ 2, 5, 6 ],
[ 6, 5, 2 ],
[ 5, 6, 2 ],
[ 2, 6, 5 ],
[ 6, 2, 5 ]
]
and essentially I want to be able to get a string that looks like this '652,625,562,526,256'
This means that the numbers are ordered and are in string format.
What I have done so far is:
arr.map(c => c.join("")).join()
Which combines it to a array, however now my thought process would be to convert this to a array of ints and then order and re-parse as strings, but there must be some kind of easier way to do this?
I'm quite new to JavaScript so any help is appreciated.
Don't do the second join immediately - instead, sort the array of joined strings first, then join:
const arr = [
[ 5, 2, 6 ],
[ 2, 5, 6 ],
[ 6, 5, 2 ],
[ 5, 6, 2 ],
[ 2, 6, 5 ],
[ 6, 2, 5 ]
];
const result = arr
.map(subarr => subarr.join(''))
.sort((a, b) => b.localeCompare(a, undefined, { numeric: true }))
.join();
console.log(result);
or map to numbers and subtract in the comparator:
const arr = [
[ 5, 2, 6 ],
[ 2, 5, 6 ],
[ 6, 5, 2 ],
[ 5, 6, 2 ],
[ 2, 6, 5 ],
[ 6, 2, 5 ]
];
const result = arr
.map(subarr => Number(subarr.join('')))
.sort((a, b) => b - a)
.join();
console.log(result);
I have an array of objects
[
{ values: [2, 7, 1] },
{ values: [1, 2, 7] },
{ values: [7, 1, 2] },
{ values: [3, 4, 5] },
{ values: [2, 1, 8] },
{ values: [2, 1, 8] },
]
I want to group these objects together with the other object with same values. So this array of objects should be grouped into 3 groups since the first 3 objects have the same values, the next object is alone and the last 2 objects have the same values.
As seen in the example, the values can have different orders, but should still be considered the same.
I am thinking about for each element to loop through the remaining elements and see if they are alike, but it will result in O(n^2).
I guess I should remove elements from the array that has already been grouped.
So how could I, efficiently, group it as
[[first, second, third],[fourth],[fifth,sixth]]
Something like this?
var data = [
{ values: [2, 7, 1] },
{ values: [1, 2, 7] },
{ values: [7, 1, 2] },
{ values: [3, 4, 5] },
{ values: [2, 1, 8] },
{ values: [2, 1, 8] },
];
var hash = {};
for(var obj of data) {
var key = obj.values.sort().join("-");
if (!hash[key]) hash[key] = [];
hash[key].push(obj);
}
var result = [];
for(var k in hash) result.push(hash[k])
console.log(result)
Or js6 variant:
var data = [
{ values: [2, 7, 1] },
{ values: [1, 2, 7] },
{ values: [7, 1, 2] },
{ values: [3, 4, 5] },
{ values: [2, 1, 8] },
{ values: [2, 1, 8] },
];
var hash = data.reduce((hash, obj) => {
const key = obj.values.sort().join("-");
if (!hash[key]) hash[key] = [];
hash[key].push(obj);
return hash;
}, [])
var result = Object.keys(hash).map(k => hash[k])
console.log(result)
You can do this with forEach() loop and sort()
var arr = [
{ values: [2, 7, 1] },
{ values: [1, 2, 7] },
{ values: [7, 1, 2] },
{ values: [3, 4, 5] },
{ values: [2, 1, 8] },
{ values: [2, 1, 8] },
];
var result = [];
arr.forEach(function(e) {
var s = [].concat(e.values).sort().join('|');
if (!this[s]) {
this[s] = [e.values];
result.push(this[s]);
} else {
this[s].push(e.values)
}
})
console.log(result)
I have an array with objects
const nodes = [ { children: [1, 2, 3] }, { children: [1, 2, 3] } ];
I want a new array [ 1, 2, 3, 1, 2, 3 ].
I have tried
nodes.map(node => node.children);
but it gives me [ [ 1, 2, 3 ], [ 1, 2, 3 ] ].
I have tried
[].concat(nodes.map(node => node.children));
but it doesn't work since it is just concatenating [] with [ [ 1, 2, 3 ], [ 1, 2, 3 ] ] which is just [ [ 1, 2, 3 ], [ 1, 2, 3 ] ].
You could use Array#reduce
const nodes = [ { children: [1, 2, 3] }, { children: [1, 2, 3] } ],
result = nodes.reduce((r, node) => r.concat(node.children), []);
console.log(result);
console.log([... new Set(result)]); // for unique values
.as-console-wrapper { max-height: 100% !important; top: 0; }
You can do this with Array#reduce
const nodes = [ { children: [1, 2, 3] }, { children: [1, 2, 3] } ];
var result = nodes.reduce(function(r, o) {
r = r.concat(o.children);
return r;
}, []);
console.log(result)
Another way to do this using Array#forEach:
const nodes = [ { children: [1, 2, 3] }, { children: [1, 2, 3] } ]
final = []
nodes.forEach(x => final = final.concat(x.children))
console.log(final)
Another shorter way is (a little modification to what OP was trying to do):
const nodes = [ { children: [1, 2, 3] }, { children: [1, 2, 3] } ];
var result = [].concat.apply([], nodes.map(x => x.children))
console.log(result);
var items = [{
//other properties... above
item_name: [
[1],
[2, 3]
],
item_description: [
[1],
[3, 4]
],
item_quantity: [
[1],
[4, 5]
],
item_value: null,
}, {
//other properties... above
item_name: 1,
item_description: 2,
item_quantity: 3,
item_value: 4,
}, {
//other properties... above
item_name: [1, 2, 3],
item_description: [1, 2, 3],
item_quantity: [1, 2, 3],
item_value: [1, 2, 3],
}];
var itemList = [];
items.forEach(function(item) {
if (!_.isArray(item.item_name)) {
itemList.push({
name: item.item_name,
description: item.item_description,
quantity: item.item_quantity,
value: item.item_value
});
}
var names = item.item_name ? _.flatten(item.item_name) : [];
var descriptions = item.item_description ? _.flatten(item.item_description) : [];
var quantity = item.item_quantity ? _.flatten(item.item_quantity) : [];
var values = item.item_value ? _.flatten(item.item_value) : [];
names.forEach(function(name, index) {
itemList.push({
name: names[index],
description: descriptions[index],
quantity: quantity[index],
values: values[index]
});
})
});
console.log(itemList);
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/underscore.js/1.4.1/underscore-min.js"></script>
is there a way I can perform this faster in underscore, to remove all of the flattens?
for each item in the array I am taking
item_name[i]
item_description[i]
item_quantity[i]
item_value[i]
and adding them to the itemList
item properties in items can be [[],[]] or [] or integer or null
currently it is outputting what is expected (unless a name is null and it can skip items) however I do not like all of the loops this is performing and I am wondering if I can make a better use of underscore library
You can use this:
var myKeys = ['name', 'description', 'quantity', 'value'];
var result = _.flatten(items.map(function(item) {
return _.zip.apply(_, myKeys.map(function(key) {
return _.flatten([item['item_'+key]]);
})).map(function(arr) {
return _.object(myKeys, arr);
});
}));
Demo:
var items = [{
//other properties... above
item_name: [
[1],
[2, 3]
],
item_description: [
[1],
[3, 4]
],
item_quantity: [
[1],
[4, 5]
],
item_value: null,
}, {
//other properties... above
item_name: 1,
item_description: 2,
item_quantity: 3,
item_value: 4,
}, {
//other properties... above
item_name: [1, 2, 3],
item_description: [1, 2, 3],
item_quantity: [1, 2, 3],
item_value: [1, 2, 3],
}];
var myKeys = ['name', 'description', 'quantity', 'value'];
var result = _.flatten(items.map(function(item) {
return _.zip.apply(_, myKeys.map(function(key) {
return _.flatten([item['item_'+key]]);
})).map(function(arr) {
return _.object(myKeys, arr);
});
}));
console.log(result);
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/underscore.js/1.4.1/underscore-min.js"></script>