I have a JSON query and I am using console.log to present it:
var json_data = {"headers":["Month","Value","Number"],"rows":[["2018-10-01 00:00:00.0","one",209],["2018-09-01 00:00:00.0","one",274],["2018-09-01 00:00:00.0","five",183],["2018-10-01 00:00:00.0","five",164],["2018-09-01 00:00:00.0","four",214],["2018-10-01 00:00:00.0","four",192],["2018-09-01 00:00:00.0","three",128],["2018-10-01 00:00:00.0","three",125],["2018-09-01 00:00:00.0","two",199],["2018-10-01 00:00:00.0","two",169],["2018-09-01 00:00:00.0","seven",10541],["2018-10-01 00:00:00.0","seven",6139],["2018-10-01 00:00:00.0","six",169],["2018-09-01 00:00:00.0","six",233]]};
document.getElementById("original").innerHTML = json_data.rows;
<div style="background:yellow; "id="original"></div>
<div style="background:red;" id="output"></div>
And for the value "one" I have two numbers (209 and 274).
I am then using a function to groupby which works fine (output). My problem is that when I use the console.log for the initial json_data query, the first two rows are different. It seems that my function replaced the first two rows with the rows of the output (red). The function is given here:
function initialGroupBy(rows) {
const
rowMap = new Map(),
result = [],
dataTemp = [];
// Iterate over the rows.
rows.forEach(row => {
const
// Create a key, it is the first elements joined together.
key = row.slice(0,1).join();
// Check if the Map has the generated key...
if (rowMap.has(key)) {
// The map has the key, we need to add up the values
const
// Get the value for the current key.
storedRow = rowMap.get(key);
// Add the value of the current row to the row in the map.
storedRow[2] += row[2];
} else {
// The key doens't exist yet, add the row to the map.
rowMap.set(key, row);
}
});
// Iterate over all the entries in the map and push each value with the
// summed up value into the array.
rowMap.forEach(value => {
result.push(value);
});
for (i = 0; i < result.length; i++)
{
var object2 = {"date": result[i][0].slice(0,7), "num": result[i][2]};
dataTemp.push(object2);
}
return dataTemp;
}
A full snippet can be found here (Compare the first two rows of the yellow box from the two snippets):
var json_data = {"headers":["Month","Value","Number"],"rows":[["2018-10-01 00:00:00.0","one",209],["2018-09-01 00:00:00.0","one",274],["2018-09-01 00:00:00.0","five",183],["2018-10-01 00:00:00.0","five",164],["2018-09-01 00:00:00.0","four",214],["2018-10-01 00:00:00.0","four",192],["2018-09-01 00:00:00.0","three",128],["2018-10-01 00:00:00.0","three",125],["2018-09-01 00:00:00.0","two",199],["2018-10-01 00:00:00.0","two",169],["2018-09-01 00:00:00.0","seven",10541],["2018-10-01 00:00:00.0","seven",6139],["2018-10-01 00:00:00.0","six",169],["2018-09-01 00:00:00.0","six",233]]};
function initialGroupBy(rows) {
const
rowMap = new Map(),
result = [],
dataTemp = [];
// Iterate over the rows.
rows.forEach(row => {
const
// Create a key, it is the first elements joined together.
key = row.slice(0,1).join();
// Check if the Map has the generated key...
if (rowMap.has(key)) {
// The map has the key, we need to add up the values
const
// Get the value for the current key.
storedRow = rowMap.get(key);
// Add the value of the current row to the row in the map.
storedRow[2] += row[2];
} else {
// The key doens't exist yet, add the row to the map.
rowMap.set(key, row);
}
});
// Iterate over all the entries in the map and push each value with the
// summed up value into the array.
rowMap.forEach(value => {
result.push(value);
});
for (i = 0; i < result.length; i++)
{
var object2 = {"date": result[i][0].slice(0,7), "num": result[i][2]};
dataTemp.push(object2);
}
return dataTemp;
}
const damn = initialGroupBy(json_data.rows);
document.getElementById("original").innerHTML = json_data.rows;
document.getElementById("output").innerHTML =JSON.stringify(damn);
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/2.1.1/jquery.min.js"></script>
<div style="background:yellow; "id="original"></div>
<br><br>
<div style="background:red;" id="output"></div>
I have tried changing the var to const in many cases. Am I missing a fundamental JavaScript case here?
As your value is an Array object, when you save it in your temporary Map, you're actually using a reference to your original data structure row.
So in the first forEach loop, where you sum the values you're actually changing the original array entry.
The solution is pretty simple, just clone the array:
rowMap.set(key, row.slice());
Another possibility is to use a different array to save the totals.
Here is your code with the fix.
var json_data = {"headers":["Month","Value","Number"],"rows":[["2018-10-01 00:00:00.0","one",209],["2018-09-01 00:00:00.0","one",274],["2018-09-01 00:00:00.0","five",183],["2018-10-01 00:00:00.0","five",164],["2018-09-01 00:00:00.0","four",214],["2018-10-01 00:00:00.0","four",192],["2018-09-01 00:00:00.0","three",128],["2018-10-01 00:00:00.0","three",125],["2018-09-01 00:00:00.0","two",199],["2018-10-01 00:00:00.0","two",169],["2018-09-01 00:00:00.0","seven",10541],["2018-10-01 00:00:00.0","seven",6139],["2018-10-01 00:00:00.0","six",169],["2018-09-01 00:00:00.0","six",233]]};
function initialGroupBy(rows) {
const
rowMap = new Map(),
result = [],
dataTemp = [];
// Iterate over the rows.
rows.forEach(row => {
const
// Create a key, it is the first elements joined together.
key = row.slice(0,1).join();
// Check if the Map has the generated key...
if (rowMap.has(key)) {
// The map has the key, we need to add up the values
const
// Get the value for the current key.
storedRow = rowMap.get(key);
// Add the value of the current row to the row in the map.
storedRow[2] += row[2];
} else {
// The key doens't exist yet, add the row to the map.
rowMap.set(key, row.slice());
}
});
// Iterate over all the entries in the map and push each value with the
// summed up value into the array.
rowMap.forEach(value => {
result.push(value);
});
for (i = 0; i < result.length; i++)
{
var object2 = {"date": result[i][0].slice(0,7), "num": result[i][2]};
dataTemp.push(object2);
}
return dataTemp;
}
const damn = initialGroupBy(json_data.rows);
document.getElementById("original").innerHTML = json_data.rows;
document.getElementById("output").innerHTML =JSON.stringify(damn);
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/2.1.1/jquery.min.js"></script>
<div style="background:yellow; "id="original"></div>
<div style="background:red;" id="output"></div>
A) The const declaration creates a read-only reference to a value. It does not mean the value it holds is immutable -> Link
B) Your problem is that you are actually editing the original object in the initialGroupBy function. Maybe this answer will be helpful.
A different logic applies here and the result is handy:
var json_data = {"headers":["Month","Value","Number"],"rows":[["2018-10-01 00:00:00.0","one",209],["2018-09-01 00:00:00.0","one",274],["2018-09-01 00:00:00.0","five",183],["2018-10-01 00:00:00.0","five",164],["2018-09-01 00:00:00.0","four",214],["2018-10-01 00:00:00.0","four",192],["2018-09-01 00:00:00.0","three",128],["2018-10-01 00:00:00.0","three",125],["2018-09-01 00:00:00.0","two",199],["2018-10-01 00:00:00.0","two",169],["2018-09-01 00:00:00.0","seven",10541],["2018-10-01 00:00:00.0","seven",6139],["2018-10-01 00:00:00.0","six",169],["2018-09-01 00:00:00.0","six",233]]};
function groupBy(accumulator, item) {
const [date,extra,value] = item;
const key = date.slice(0,7);
if(!accumulator[key]){
accumulator[key] = 0
}
accumulator[key] += value;
return accumulator;
}
var damn = json_data.rows.reduce(groupBy,{});
damn = Object.keys(damn).map(function(key){
return {date: key, Value: "Total", num: damn[key]};
})
document.getElementById("original").innerHTML = json_data.rows;
document.getElementById("output").innerHTML =JSON.stringify(damn);
<div style="background:yellow; "id="original"></div>
<div style="background:red;" id="output"></div>
Related
So I wrote some code that goes to a book's ID based on a "dictionary" and takes the data from all the sheets in that book after the second sheet. That data is then aggregated into a single array. My question centers around the idea of improving the for loop in the if statement. That is adding the "supplier name" to the front of the subarray that represents a row in the sheet/data. I was told that this is inefficient as the code has to go through each subarray and add a value.
Is there a more efficient way of doing this? I did it this way because I am copying the values of a range which are stored as an array of arrays. So to add data, I have to reaccess the subarrays. Is it possible to add the new data (supplier name) at the same time that the values are being copied? would this be more efficient? It was recommended to use an arrow function, however, I am not familiar with their usage.
function aggregate() {
var combinedData = []
var idArray = {
"suppliername":"id",
};
for (var supplierName in idArray){
var sBook = SpreadsheetApp.openById(idArray[supplierName]);
var sheets = sBook.getSheets();
for (var index = 2; index <sheets.length; index++){
var sheet = sheets[index];
var dataLength = sheet.getRange("E5:E").getValues().filter(String).length;
if(dataLength != 0){
var dataRange = sheet.getRange(5,2,dataLength,14);
var dataValues = dataRange.getValues();
for (row in dataValues) {
dataValues[row].unshift(supplierName);
};
combinedData = combinedData.concat(dataValues);
};
};
};
var dataLength = combinedData.length;
const dSheet = SpreadsheetApp.openById("id").getSheets()[0];
dSheet.getRange(2,1,dSheet.getMaxRows(),dSheet.getMaxColumns()).clearContent();
var dRange = dSheet.getRange(2,1,dataLength,15);
dRange.setValues(combinedData);
};
In your script, how about the following modification?
From:
for (row in dataValues) {
dataValues[row].unshift(supplierName);
};
combinedData = combinedData.concat(dataValues);
To:
combinedData = combinedData.concat(dataValues.map(e => [supplierName].concat(e)));
or
combinedData = [...combinedData, ...dataValues.map(e => [supplierName, ...e])];
References:
map()
Spread syntax
I'm trying to manipulate the repeater list in Wix. When the user selects the quantity of equipment, that number of forms show up. I got the hang of it when I see it in the console log but when I try to display it on the web, it gives me an error. I've tried reassigning $w("#repeater1").data to newArr(the new data).
Here's my code
$w("#repeater1").hide();
let itemOptions = $w("#quoteDropdown").options
$w("#quoteDropdown").onChange((event) => {
$w("#repeater1").show();
const arrOfValues = []
let newArr = []
let repeaterData = $w("#repeater1").data;
let quantity = Number(event.target.value);
let iterator = repeaterData.values();
for(const value of iterator) {
arrOfValues.push(value);
}
for(let i = 0 ; i < itemOptions.length; i++) {
newArr = repeaterData.slice(0, quantity);
}
if(quantity > newArr.length) {
let newItems = arrOfValues.filter(arr => {
newArr.forEach(na => arr !== na)
})
newArr.push(newItems)
}
console.log("newArr");
console.log(newArr);
// $w("#repeater1").data is the original data from the repeater
// newArr is the altered data from the repeater based on how it appears based on the users' interaction.
// I've tried each one of these
// $w("#repeater1").data = newArr;
// return newArr;
}); // end onChange
If you're trying to assign the array as the data for a repeater, you need to follow some rules. First, it needs to be an array of objects. Second, each object needs to have an _id property.
I am trying to iterate over a large 2D array which is over 3000 rows and 54 columns. Each index contains either a string or integer value. When I try to use a nested for loop I am unable to test it since it just takes to long to complete. How can I get around this issue?
I have this code from an earlier post that does something similar:
function getOrder() {
const srcSheetName = "result";
const dstSheetName = "Order Changes";
const ss = SpreadsheetApp.getActiveSpreadsheet();
// 1. Retrieve source values.
const srcSheet = ss.getSheetByName(srcSheetName);
const [[,,,,,,,, ...header], ...srcValues] = srcSheet.getRange("F1:BQ" + srcSheet.getLastRow()).getValues();
// 2. Create an object using the source values.
const srcObj = srcValues.reduce((o, [a,,,,,,,, ...v]) => {
const temp = v.reduce((s, r, i) => {
if (r.toString() != "") s += `${header[i]} (${r}) `;
return s;
}, "");
return Object.assign(o, {[a]: temp || ""});
}, {});
// 3. Retrieve the header column of destination values.
const dstSheet = ss.getSheetByName(dstSheetName);
const dstRange = dstSheet.getRange(3, 1, dstSheet.getLastRow() - 1);
const dstValues = dstRange.getValues();
// 4. Create the output values using the header column and the object.
const putValues = dstValues.map(([a]) => [srcObj[a] || ""]);
console.log(srcObj)
// 5. Put the values.
dstRange.offset(0, 2).setValues(putValues);
}
The above code matches names on two different sheets and returns the values and headers of each column if a match is found and does so very quickly with the same number of entries. I assume it is so quick because of .reduce to remove unnecessary information in the 2d array.
How can I achieve a similar speed? I would like to search the 2d array for non-zero entries of a row in the last 12 columns. If any of the columns contain a value I would like to return index 0 of that row and continue until the array has been completely cycled through.
I have tried to adjust the above code but I don't understand it entirely and can't manipulate it how I'd like. Here is what I have written:
function getCustomer(){
const srcSheetName = "result";
const dstSheetName = "Allergy";
const ss = SpreadsheetApp.getActiveSpreadsheet();
const srcSheet = ss.getSheetByName(srcSheetName);
const allergyRange = srcSheet.getRange('F1:BQ' + srcSheet.getLastRow()).getValues();
const dstSheet = ss.getSheetByName(dstSheetName);
Logger.log(allergyRange);
for (let i = 0; i < allergyRange.length; i++){
for (let k = 0; k < allergyRange[i].length; k++){
Logger.log("hi");
}
}
}
I would like to nest an if statement in the code I've written but am unaware of a way to refer to a range of indices in a row of a 2d Array and at this point I think this would take too much time to be practical. Any tips would be greatly appreciated.
Assuming allergyRange is formatted like [row, ...] where each row is an array with each of its indices referring to a column:
allergyRange.map(row => row.slice(row.length-12)).forEach((row, i) => {
if(!row.every(val => val == 0)) console.log(allergyRange[i][0])
});
This maps a new array of arrays that contain just the last 12 columns, checks if every value in that row is equal to 0, and if not logs the 0th index of that row.
I'm trying to write a vote counting function, I have an array of objects and each object has a property called currentVote which has a userId value. I want to find out which userID has the most votes. Using lodash this is what I got so far:
function countVotes(players) {
return new Promise(function(resolve, reject) {
//votes should be empty, filled it with some sample values
let votes = ['312139659792875521','360445341989863434', '312139659792875521','360445341989863435','1','9999999999999999999999'];
for (let i = 0, j = players.length; i < j; i++) {
votes.push(players[i].currentVote);
}
let tally = _.chain(votes)
.countBy()
.toPairs()
.sortBy(1).reverse()
.map(0)
.value()[0];
resolve(tally);
});
How can I pick a random value IF I have multiple userIds with the same number of votes. At the moment it seems that the smallest ID will always be picked?
Based on your question, I believe your object is as follow, I have used the array method sort to sort the array in descending and picked up the first element. Hope this helps.
let players = [{
"userId":1,
"currentVotes":2220
},
{
"userId":2,
"currentVotes":383830
},
{
"userId":3,
"currentVotes":6894740
},
{
"userId":4,
"currentVotes":6894740
},
{
"userId":5,
"currentVotes":1
}
];
function getHighestVoteByRandowm(players){
let arrSameVotes = [];
let i = 0;
do{
arrSameVotes.push(players[i]);
temp = players[i].currentVotes;
i++;
}while(players[i].currentVotes == temp);
let rndTill = arrSameVotes.length - 1;
let rndVal = Math.round(Math.random() * rndTill);
return arrSameVotes[rndVal];
}
function sortVotes(a,b){
return b.currentVotes - a.currentVotes;
}
let highestVotesPlayer = getHighestVoteByRandowm(players.sort(sortVotes));
console.log(highestVotesPlayer);
You could use _.shuffle and _.first. Maybe something like:
_.chain(votes).countBy()
.groupBy() // added this to get a list of all the ones that have matching vote counts
.toPairs()
.sortBy(0)
.reverse()
.first() // most votes
.last() // get the user ids
.shuffle() // randomize order
.first() // get whatever is first
.value()
Can someone show me the javascript I need to use to dynamically create a two dimensional Javascript Array like below?
desired array contents:
[["test1","test2","test3","test4","test5"],["test6","test7","test8","test9","test10"]]
current invalid output from alert(outterArray):
"test6","test7","test8","test9","test10","test6","test7","test8","test9","test10"
JavaScript code:
var outterArray = new Array();
var innerArray = new Array();
var outterCount=0;
$something.each(function () {
var innerCount = 0;//should reset the inner array and overwrite previous values?
$something.somethingElse.each(function () {
innerArray[innerCount] = $(this).text();
innerCount++;
}
outterArray[outterCount] = innerArray;
outterCount++;
}
alert(outterArray);
This is pretty cut and dry, just set up a nested loop:
var count = 1;
var twoDimensionalArray =[];
for (var i=0;i<2;i++)
{
var data = [];
for (var j=0;j<5;j++)
{
data.push("Test" + count);
count++;
}
twoDimensionalArray.push(data);
}
It sounds like you want to map the array of text for each $something element into an outer jagged array. If so then try the following
var outterArray = [];
$something.each(function () {
var innerArray = [];
$(this).somethingElse.each(function () {
innerArray.push($(this).text());
});
outterArray.push(innerArray);
});
alert(outterArray);
A more flexible approach is to use raw objects, they are used in a similar way than dictionaries. Dynamically expendables and with more options to define the index (as string).
Here you have an example:
var myArray = {};
myArray[12]="banana";
myArray["superman"]=123;
myArray[13]={}; //here another dimension is created
myArray[13][55]="This is the second dimension";
You don't need to keep track of array lengths yourself; the runtime maintains the ".length" property for you. On top of that, there's the .push() method to add an element to the end of an array.
// ...
innerArray.push($(this).text());
// ...
outerArray.push(innerArray);
To make a new array, just use []:
innerArray = []; // new array for this row
Also "outer" has only one "t" :-)
[SEE IT IN ACTION ON JSFIDDLE] If that $something variable is a jQuery search, you can use .map() function like this:
var outterArray = [];
var outterArray = $('.something').map(function() {
// find .somethingElse inside current element
return [$(this).find('.somethingElse').map(function() {
return $(this).text();
}).get()]; // return an array of texts ['text1', 'text2','text3']
}).get(); // use .get() to get values only, as .map() normally returns jQuery wrapped array
// notice that this alert text1,text2,text3,text4,text5,text6
alert(outterArray);
// even when the array is two dimensional as you can do this:
alert(outterArray[0]);
alert(outterArray[1]);
HTML:
<div class="something">
<span class="somethingElse">test1</span>
<span class="somethingElse">test2</span>
<span class="somethingElse">test3</span>
</div>
<div class="something">
<span class="somethingElse">test4</span>
<span class="somethingElse">test5</span>
<span class="somethingElse">test6</span>
</div>
Here you can see it working in a jsFiddle with your expected result: http://jsfiddle.net/gPKKG/2/
I had a similar issue recently while working on a Google Spreadsheet and came up with an answer similar to BrianV's:
// 1st nest to handle number of columns I'm formatting, 2nd nest to build 2d array
for (var i = 1; i <= 2; i++) {
tmpRange = sheet.getRange(Row + 1, Col + i, numCells2Format); // pass/fail cells
var d2Arr = [];
for (var j = 0; j < numCells2Format; j++) {
// 1st column of cells I'm formatting
if ( 1 == i) {
d2Arr[j] = ["center"];
// 2nd column of cells I'm formatting
} else if ( 2 == i ) {
d2Arr[j] = ["left"];
}
}
tmpRange.setHorizontalAlignments( d2Arr );
}
So, basically, I had to make the assignment d2Arr[index]=["some string"] in order to build the multidimensional array I was looking for. Since the number of cells I wanted to format can change from sheet to sheet, I wanted it generalized. The case I was working out required a 15-dimension array. Assigning a 1-D array to elements in a 1-D array ended up making the 15-D array I needed.
you can use Array.apply
Array.apply(0, Array(ARRAY_SIZE)).map((row, rowIndex) => {
return Array.apply(0, Array(ARRAY_SIZE)).map((column, columnIndex) => {
return null;
});
});`