This question already has answers here:
JavaScript: How to reverse a number?
(19 answers)
Closed 3 years ago.
Can anyone show me where I'm going wrong in my code please? I'm trying to reverse a number without changing it to a string. I've been searching google and looked through the previous questions asked about this topic and from what I can see my code mirrors the other answers.
I've only been able to find code in Java, C, or C++ that do not use the to string method.
In my attempts, when I run the code in the browser console it either gives me an answer of "Infinity" or crashes my browser.
Here's my code...
function reverseNumber(number) {
var revNumber = 0;
while (number > 0) {
revNumber = (revNumber * 10) + (number % 10);
number = number / 10;
}
return revNumber;
}
console.log(reverseNumber(876));
I know it must be some small syntax error but I just don't see it. Any insight would be appreciated. Thanks!
number = number / 10; inside a while loop whose condition is number > 0 means that number will only reach 0 after a very large number of iterations, once number precision fails. (eg. 876 => 87.6 => 8.76 => .876 => .0876...) That's not what you want. You might divide by 10 and drop the decimal part:
function reverseNumber(number) {
var revNumber = 0;
while (number > 0) {
revNumber = (revNumber * 10) + (number % 10);
number = Math.floor(number / 10);
}
return revNumber;
}
console.log(reverseNumber(876));
These works.
Basic Implementation:
function reverse(n)
{
var temp=0;
while(n)
{
temp *= 10;
temp += n%10;
n = Math.floor(n/10);
}
return temp;
}
console.log(reverse(123))
console.log(reverse(456))
console.log(reverse(789))
console.log(reverse(7890))
Inline Basic implementation:
function reverse(n)
{
var reverse=0;
while(n>0) (reverse=reverse*10+n%10, n=Math.floor(n/10));
return reverse;
}
console.log(reverse(123))
console.log(reverse(456))
console.log(reverse(789))
console.log(reverse(7890))
Implementation using arrays.
function reverse(n)
{
var arr=[], reverse=0;
while(n>0) (arr.push(n%10), n=Math.floor(n/10));
while(arr.length) reverse=reverse*10+arr.shift();
return reverse;
}
console.log(reverse(123))
console.log(reverse(456))
console.log(reverse(789))
console.log(reverse(7890))
number = Math.floor(number / 10);
You need to Math.floor as number = number / 10; will give in floating points value which will always be greater than 0
function reverseNumber(number) {
var revNumber = 0;
console.log("######### steps ###########");
while (number > 0) {
console.log("Step " , number);
revNumber = (revNumber * 10) + (number % 10);
number = Math.floor(number / 10);
}
console.log("######### steps End ###########");
return revNumber;
}
console.log(reverseNumber(876));
function reverseNumber(number) {
var revNumber = 0;
while (number > 0) {
revNumber = (revNumber * 10) + (number % 10);
number = Math.floor(number / 10);
}
return revNumber;
}
console.log(reverseNumber(876));
El problema estaba en la reeasignaciĆ³n del valor del number, con el Math.floor sacamos la parte entera y solo esta, asi evitamos los decimales.
function reverseInt(int) {
return parseInt(int.toString().split('').reverse().join(''))
}
console.log(reverseInt(510));
Related
I am doing a coding challenge that reads like this:
Create a function runningAverage() that returns a callable function object. Update the series with each given value and calculate the current average.
rAvg = runningAverage();
rAvg(10) = 10.0;
rAvg(11) = 10.5;
rAvg(12) = 11;
I got a working solution, yet they also want the results to be rounded like this:
rAvg(13) = 13.50678; => 13.50
rAvg(13) = 13.50; => 13.50
rAvg(13) = 13.5; => 13.5
rAvg(13) = 13; => 13
Here is my code:
function runningAverage() {
let number = 0;
let numbOfFunctionCalls = 0;
return function (y) {
number += y;
numbOfFunctionCalls ++;
let average = (number/numbOfFunctionCalls);
let averageArray = average.toString().split('.');
//to get the number of decimal places
//e.g 11.543 ==> ['11', '543']
if ((Array.from(averageArray[1]).length) >= 2) {
return average.toPrecision(2);
}
else if ((Array.from(averageArray[1]).length) = 1) {
return average.toPrecision(1);
}
else {
return average;
}
}
}
I tested parts of the function separately and it seems to work, yet when I invoke it I get the message 'cannot convert undefined or null to object'.
This sounds like a fun coding challenge!
In this case, you want toFixed(), not toPrecision(). toPrecision() essentially allows you determine how many digits TOTAL (including those on the left of the decimal point) should appear, whereas toFixed() focuses on the number of digits to the right of the decimal point. Feel free to look these two methods up on MDN. When you read that toPrecision() may return exponential notation, this should make you pause and think, "That's weird. Why does this happen? When does this happen?", rather than "this detail is unimportant."
Your .length = 1 comparison needs to be modified to a ===.
Your code currently fails if an integer is the first number provided to rAvg(). In your first conditional, Array.from(undefined) may run, which is not permissible in JavaScript. You should consider ways to only work with "the digits to the right of the decimal" only if "there are digits to the right of the decimal."
Here is a working solution including all the suggestions, in case someone is interested:
function runningAverage() {
let number = 0;
let numbOfFunctionCalls = 0;
return function (y) {
number += y;
numbOfFunctionCalls ++;
let average = (number/numbOfFunctionCalls);
let numIsDecimal = average.toString().includes('.');
if (numIsDecimal) {
let averageArray = average.toString().split('.');
//to get the number of decimal places
//e.g 11.543 ==> ['11', '543']
if ((Array.from(averageArray[1]).length) >= 2) {
return Number(average.toFixed(2));
}
if ((Array.from(averageArray[1]).length) === 1) {
return Number(average.toFixed(1));
}
}
else {
return Number(average);
}
}
}
Not sure if this works but try it
function runningAverage() {
let number = 0;
let numbOfFunctionCalls = 0;
return function (y) {
number += y;
numbOfFunctionCalls ++;
let average = (number/numbOfFunctionCalls);
let averageArray = average.toString().split('.');
if ((Array.from(averageArray[1]).length) >= 2) {
return Math.round(average.toPrecision(2) * 2) / 2;
} else if ((Array.from(averageArray[1]).length) == 1) {
return Math.round(average.toPrecision(1) * 2) / 2;
} else {
return Math.round(average * 2) / 2;
};
};
};
I want the user to enter a number and print back the amount of digits of that number.
I know that I can use length, but my homework asking for while loop.
This is what I have so far:
var num;
var count = 0;
num = prompt('Enter number: ');
function counter(x, y) {
while (x > 0) {
y++;
x /= 10;
}
return y;
}
var result = counter(num, count);
console.log(result);
When I give the number 3456 (example), I get back the number 328. I want it to print back the number 4.
This line:
x /= 10;
Should be changed to:
x = Math.floor(x / 10);
The logic assumes integer division: 1234 is supposed to become 123, 12, 1 and 0. JavaScript does not have built in integer division so you need to use Math.floor to emulate it. Complete example with some fixes:
function countDigits(num) {
var count = 0;
while (num > 0) {
num = Math.floor(num / 10);
count++;
}
return count;
}
var num;
do {
num = Number(prompt("Enter number:"));
} while (Number.isNaN(num));
num = Math.abs(num); // just in case you want to handle -ve numbers
var result = countDigits(num);
console.log(result);
The problem is that the division operation will eventually end up converting x to a float and you'll have something like:
x / 10 === 0.1;
x / 10 === 0.01;
x / 10 === 0.001;
....
if you always parse (round) the result of the division to an integer, you'll get the expected result.
var num;
var count = 0;
num = prompt('Enter number: ');
function counter(x, y) {
while (x > 0) {
y++;
x = parseInt(x / 10);
}
return y;
}
var result = counter(num, count);
console.log(result);
You could check againt a number by taking the power of a decimal count.
function counter(value) {
var decimals = 0;
do {
decimals++;
} while (value >= 10 ** decimals)
return decimals;
}
console.log(counter(0));
console.log(counter(1));
console.log(counter(7));
console.log(counter(42));
console.log(counter(999));
console.log(counter(1000));
console.log(counter(1001));
First of all you should convert the input into a number, preferably using the Number function (using unary + has the same effect).
Secondly a division like 5 / 10 will return 0.5 which is bigger than 0. You should instead check if the number is bigger than or equal to 1.
function counter(num) {
num = Math.abs(num) / 10;
var count = 1;
while (num >= 1) {
count++;
num /= 10;
}
return count;
}
console.log(counter(+prompt('Enter number: ')));
You could also use a do while loop and avoid having an extra division outside the loop.
As others have pointed out, y doesn't need to be a parameter, it can be a local variable. But that's not your problem; let's add some extra logging to your loop:
function counter(x) {
let y=0;
while (x > 0) {
console.log("x=" + x + ", y=" + y);
y++;
x /= 10;
}
return y;
}
counter(3456);
The output looks like this:
x=3456, y=0
x=345.6, y=1
x=34.56, y=2
x=3.4560000000000004, y=3
x=0.3456, y=4
x=0.03456, y=5
...
You wanted the loop to stop at 0.3456, but that's still more than 0. (This mistake actually gives you a chance to learn something extra: can you explain why the loop ever finishes at all?)
Hopefully this will give you enough of a hint to complete the homework assignment - remember that debugging is an extremely important part of programming.
Please don't use cycles to measure length of an integer...
Use math instead! Logarithm will do much better job for you.
function numberLength(number) {
return Math.floor(Math.log10(Math.abs(number))) + 1
}
console.log(numberLength(YOUR_NUMBER));
This code returns NaN when the input is 0. I think it depends on your philosophy what length the 0 should have, so I am leaving that case unhandled.
I have to calculate value of Pi using Gregory-Leibniz series:
pi = 4 * ((1/1 - 1/3) + (1/5 - 1/7) + (1/9 - 1/11) + ...)
I want to write a function in JavaScript that would take the number of digits that needs to be displayed as an argument. But I'm not sure if my way of thinking is fine here.
This is what I got so far:
function pi(n) {
var pi = 0;
for (i=1; i <= n; i+2) {
pi = 4 * ((1/i) + (1/(i+2)))
}
return pi;
}
How do I write the pi calculation so it calculates values till n?
You could use an increment of 4 and multiply at the end of the function with 4.
n is not the number of digits, but the counter of the value of the series.
function pi(n) {
var v = 0;
for (i = 1; i <= n; i += 4) { // increment by 4
v += 1 / i - 1 / (i + 2); // add the value of the series
}
return 4 * v; // apply the factor at last
}
console.log(pi(1000000000));
You may also do as follows; The function will iterate 10M times and will return you PI with n significant digits after the decimal point.
function getPI(n){
var i = 1,
p = 0;
while (i < 50000000){
p += 1/i - 1/(i+2);
i += 4;
}
return +(4*p).toFixed(n);
}
var myPI = getPI(10);
console.log("myPI #n:100M:", myPI);
console.log("Math.PI :", Math.PI);
console.log("The Diff :", Math.PI-myPI);
I have a variable that has a number between 1-3.
I need to randomly generate a new number between 1-3 but it must not be the same as the last one.
It happens in a loop hundreds of times.
What is the most efficient way of doing this?
May the powers of modular arithmetic help you!!
This function does what you want using the modulo operator:
/**
* generate(1) will produce 2 or 3 with probablity .5
* generate(2) will produce 1 or 3 with probablity .5
* ... you get the idea.
*/
function generate(nb) {
rnd = Math.round(Math.random())
return 1 + (nb + rnd) % 3
}
if you want to avoid a function call, you can inline the code.
Here is a jsFiddle that solves your problem : http://jsfiddle.net/AsMWG/
I've created an array containing 1,2,3 and first I select any number and swap it with the last element. Then I only pick elements from position 0 and 1, and swap them with last element.
var x = 1; // or 2 or 3
// this generates a new x out of [1,2,3] which is != x
x = (Math.floor(2*Math.random())+x) % 3 + 1;
You can randomly generate numbers with the random number generator built in to javascript. You need to use Math.random().
If you're push()-ing into an array, you can always check if the previously inserted one is the same number, thus you regenerate the number. Here is an example:
var randomArr = [];
var count = 100;
var max = 3;
var min = 1;
while (randomArr.length < count) {
var r = Math.floor(Math.random() * (max - min) + min);
if (randomArr.length == 0) {
// start condition
randomArr.push(r);
} else if (randomArr[randomArr.length-1] !== r) {
// if the previous value is not the same
// then push that value into the array
randomArr.push(r);
}
}
As Widor commented generating such a number is equivalent to generating a number with probability 0.5. So you can try something like this (not tested):
var x; /* your starting number: 1,2 or 3 */
var y = Math.round(Math.random()); /* generates 0 or 1 */
var i = 0;
var res = i+1;
while (i < y) {
res = i+1;
i++;
if (i+1 == x) i++;
}
The code is tested and it does for what you are after.
var RandomNumber = {
lastSelected: 0,
generate: function() {
var random = Math.floor(Math.random()*3)+1;
if(random == this.lastSelected) {
generateNumber();
}
else {
this.lastSelected = random;
return random;
}
}
}
RandomNumber.generate();
How would I go about rounded a number up the nearest multiple of 3?
i.e.
25 would return 27
1 would return 3
0 would return 3
6 would return 6
if(n > 0)
return Math.ceil(n/3.0) * 3;
else if( n < 0)
return Math.floor(n/3.0) * 3;
else
return 3;
Simply:
3.0*Math.ceil(n/3.0)
?
Here you are!
Number.prototype.roundTo = function(num) {
var resto = this%num;
if (resto <= (num/2)) {
return this-resto;
} else {
return this+num-resto;
}
}
Examples:
y = 236.32;
x = y.roundTo(10);
// results in x = 240
y = 236.32;
x = y.roundTo(5);
// results in x = 235
I'm answering this in psuedocode since I program mainly in SystemVerilog and Vera (ASIC HDL). % represents a modulus function.
round_number_up_to_nearest_divisor = number + ((divisor - (number % divisor)) % divisor)
This works in any case.
The modulus of the number calculates the remainder, subtracting that from the divisor results in the number required to get to the next divisor multiple, then the "magic" occurs. You would think that it's good enough to have the single modulus function, but in the case where the number is an exact multiple of the divisor, it calculates an extra multiple. ie, 24 would return 27. The additional modulus protects against this by making the addition 0.
As mentioned in a comment to the accepted answer, you can just use this:
Math.ceil(x/3)*3
(Even though it does not return 3 when x is 0, because that was likely a mistake by the OP.)
Out of the nine answers posted before this one (that have not been deleted or that do not have such a low score that they are not visible to all users), only the ones by Dean Nicholson (excepting the issue with loss of significance) and beauburrier are correct. The accepted answer gives the wrong result for negative numbers and it adds an exception for 0 to account for what was likely a mistake by the OP. Two other answers round a number to the nearest multiple instead of always rounding up, one more gives the wrong result for negative numbers, and three more even give the wrong result for positive numbers.
This function will round up to the nearest multiple of whatever factor you provide.
It will not round up 0 or numbers which are already multiples.
round_up = function(x,factor){ return x - (x%factor) + (x%factor>0 && factor);}
round_up(25,3)
27
round up(1,3)
3
round_up(0,3)
0
round_up(6,3)
6
The behavior for 0 is not what you asked for, but seems more consistent and useful this way. If you did want to round up 0 though, the following function would do that:
round_up = function(x,factor){ return x - (x%factor) + ( (x%factor>0 || x==0) && factor);}
round_up(25,3)
27
round up(1,3)
3
round_up(0,3)
3
round_up(6,3)
6
Building on #Makram's approach, and incorporating #Adam's subsequent comments, I've modified the original Math.prototype example such that it accurately rounds negative numbers in both zero-centric and unbiased systems:
Number.prototype.mround = function(_mult, _zero) {
var bias = _zero || false;
var base = Math.abs(this);
var mult = Math.abs(_mult);
if (bias == true) {
base = Math.round(base / mult) * _mult;
base = (this<0)?-base:base ;
} else {
base = Math.round(this / _mult) * _mult;
}
return parseFloat(base.toFixed(_mult.precision()));
}
Number.prototype.precision = function() {
if (!isFinite(this)) return 0;
var a = this, e = 1, p = 0;
while (Math.round(a * e) / e !== a) { a *= 10; p++; }
return p;
}
Examples:
(-2).mround(3) returns -3;
(0).mround(3) returns 0;
(2).mround(3) returns 3;
(25.4).mround(3) returns 24;
(15.12).mround(.1) returns 15.1
(n - n mod 3)+3
$(document).ready(function() {
var modulus = 3;
for (i=0; i < 21; i++) {
$("#results").append("<li>" + roundUp(i, modulus) + "</li>")
}
});
function roundUp(number, modulus) {
var remainder = number % modulus;
if (remainder == 0) {
return number;
} else {
return number + modulus - remainder;
}
}
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.11.1/jquery.min.js"></script>
Round up to nearest multiple of 3:
<ul id="results">
</ul>
A more general answer that might help somebody with a more general problem: if you want to round numbers to multiples of a fraction, consider using a library. This is a valid use case in GUI where decimals are typed into input and for instance you want to coerce them to multiples of 0.25, 0.2, 0.5 etc. Then the naive approach won't get you far:
function roundToStep(value, step) {
return Math.round(value / step) * step;
}
console.log(roundToStep(1.005, 0.01)); // 1, and should be 1.01
After hours of trying to write up my own function and looking up npm packages, I decided that Decimal.js gets the job done right away. It even has a toNearest method that does exactly that, and you can choose whether to round up, down, or to closer value (default).
const Decimal = require("decimal.js")
function roundToStep (value, step) {
return new Decimal(value).toNearest(step).toNumber();
}
console.log(roundToStep(1.005, 0.01)); // 1.01
RunKit example
Using remainder operator (modulus):
(n - 1 - (n - 1) % 3) + 3
By the code given below use can change any numbers and you can find any multiple of any number
let numbers = [8,11,15];
let multiple = 3
let result = numbers.map(myFunction);
function myFunction(n){
let answer = Math.round(n/multiple) * multiple ;
if (answer <= 0)
return multiple
else
return answer
}
console.log("Closest Multiple of " + multiple + " is " + result);
if(x%3==0)
return x
else
return ((x/3|0)+1)*3