I am working on a fiddle which is working perfectly fine in a desktop view.
The desktop view works in a way that on click of any 2 product items (By default, one remain selected) , the description box gets displayed at the bottom giving detailed explanation of those product items.
The snippets of CSS codes which I have used for the mobile view:
#media only screen and (max-width: 767px)
{
.product-all-contents
{
overflow-x: auto;
}
.product-contents .product{
min-width: 50.795%;
margin: 0 2%;
padding-top: 3.91%;
padding-left: 3.91%; padding-right: 3.91%;
}
}
Problem Statement:
In the mobile view, there is one small issue. The issue is that, I am seeing the explanation of both product items whereas only one should be displayed without changing the look of it i.e. items should remain piled up.
I want the mobile view to work exactly in a way as in the desktop view i.e. when we click one product item, the description box should display at the bottom and when we click another product item another description box should display at the bottom.
The reason why I have used display:inline-block !important because I want the items to pile up vertically in mobile view in html/css. Removing that will make the images and text squished.
This happens because of you have set display: inline-block !important; for div.franchisehubtv and div.cloudbasedtextipad in #media only screen and (max-width: 767px) which override your display: none; css.
Solution No: 1
You can remove those classes from the media query, so your #media will be like this
#media only screen and (max-width: 767px)
{
div.goal-setting, div.customization-tools, div.custom-invoicing, div.lead-tracking, div.email-marketing, div.royalty-calculator, div.brand-control, div.business-analytics,div.tech-support, div.employee-management, div.order-management, div.white-label {
display: inline-block !important;
}
.cloudbasedtextipad, .franchisehubtv {
flex-direction: column;
}
.tv img {
max-width: 100%;
height: auto;
}
}
Solution No: 2
You need to override those css by adding these lines
div.franchisehubtv[style="display: none;"] {
display: none !important;
}
div.cloudbasedtextipad[style="display: none;"] {
display: none !important;
}
Updated fiddle here
Update: You can set your layout using flex for small devices
Didn't get you clearly, can you please specify is this mobile view the one you want to be the same display in desktop? if so then i recommend you to check how to use bootstrap grid system and you can use their CSS as a benchmark.
Looking at your current solution, the second div has a style rule that is invoked below 767px, which forces it to display as an inline-block. By adding the !important declaration, this then overrides any other property declaration.
If you remove this rule, you'll get a broken layout, but the div is hidden as required.
As to the layout, the content within each div will need some refined flexbox rules, which can use the same breakpoint to switch between column or row direction:
flex-direction: column (for mobile)
flex-direction: row (for non-mobile)
One problem you have is because you set the display property as inline style in the HTML, so you have to use important to overwrite.
The second problem is that you are not having in count the display: inline-block on your jQuery.
You are going to have to change several things, I've changed the fiddle to account for these things, only works if you click in the buttons, on load you see both items, there are several ways you can do these things, I only want to make the minimal changes to show the result.
https://jsfiddle.net/zaefnson/2/
And on desktop probably doesn't work either, just like I said, there are several things you are going to have to change.
Related
I'm using ng-zorro-antd 7.0.0 rc3 with angular 7.2.4.
My problem is: I can not scroll horizontal while using the nz-range-picker on mobile browser, it seem the element was too large with the screen, but the parent of nz-range-picker has "over-flow-x: hidden", or "over-flow: hidden" attribute.
But i can't find what element to fix this.
I went to the documents of Ng-Zorro and it seem that they have had this problem too: https://ng.ant.design/components/date-picker/en#header
I also seen the react version of Ant Design and it doesn't have this problem: https://ant.design/components/date-picker/#header
Can any one help me with this?
Range picker cannot scroll when over-flow-x on mobile screen
Thank to AlokeT, I have resolved this problem.
I make the picker display vertical when responsive to mobile.
Add this to src/styles.less (or css | scss)
// #screen-sm-min = 576px, or you can choose another break point
#media only screen and (max-width: #screen-sm-min + 100px) {
.ant-calendar-range {
width: 276px;
.ant-calendar-range-part {
width: 100%;
}
.ant-calendar-range-right {
float: left;
border-top: 1px solid #e8e8e8;
}
}
}
This is a pretty absurd question but has been bugging me for a while now. I am designing this website and I am just finishing off on the responsive/mobile view. Currently it looks okay but that's because I delete the images with display : none: when the view port becomes too small for the image to look good. (Can bee seen at drleilamasson.com/css/responsive.css)
The images I want to change are the book (under the book section) and the parrot (under the social section) If I were to not delete them they would just go over the text / embedded post I have and block the content. What I want to happen is that the book image goes above the text centered perfectly. I have fiddled around with the styles of these images but never been able to figure it out.
I hope you guys can figure it out! Thanks :)
You've already set a flexbox parent on the <section id="about">, so we can play with the direction and ordering of the children.
#media (max-width: 1065px) {
#about {
flex-direction: column; /* stack the children */
}
.leila-book-img {
...
display: none; <-- remove
margin: 0 auto;
order: 2; /* put the image container after the text */
}
.about-content {
padding-bottom: 1em;
}
}
I have several divs, that should have the same height, if the screen size is above a certain width.
I thought its a good idea to use a class .sameheight as selector to create a "global working function". Next I would assign another class, to pair the divs, that should have the same height, like so:
.sameheight-01
.sameheight-01
.sameheight-02
.sameheight-02
.sameheight-02
I have several issues, that prevent me from writing my own script, as I have not enough skills in javascript/jQuery:
How can I make it a responsive function, not just set the height once after loading (using window.resize)?
How can I target .sameheight and search for other classes, without writing the same line multiple times (.hasClass(sameheight-01).hasClass(sameheight-02), etc.)?
How can I make this scalable? (Imagen I have twenty groups with ten different media queries)
I have created a JS Fiddle Demo to illustrate my problem.
How far back do you have to support?
Because this could be solved using display:flex;
.row-sameheight {
display: flex;
display: -webkit-flex;
display: -moz-box;
width: 100%;
}
Here's a JS Fiddle
this you could achieve using CSS itself
#media (min-width:500px){
.sameheight {
min-height:100px;
}
}
or
if u want to do through js/jq, refer the modification of fiddle code
http://jsfiddle.net/qj3ntsjs/11/ or
http://jsfiddle.net/qj3ntsjs/17/
For my first responsive design I use css #media with display: none; or display:table-cell to show or hide sidebars. This works fine, I need the display:table-cell for a three divs layout.
CSS example:
#div_right { display: table-cell; }
#media screen and (max-width: 700px) { #div_right {display: none; } }
JS is standard ToogleDisplay function (with e.style.display = "table-cell"; in place of e.style.display = "block"; )
On small windows/screen the sidebars are hidden, but a new div with 2 options to display these 2 same navigation sidebars appears: clicking on a link with embedded javascript, allows to toogle display of a sidebar div. It also works fine.
The problem comes when I show then hide the sidebars by clicking on the JS links (on small windows), and then resize the window to a larger width: the sidebars are not displayed this time!
Is there a #media condition to specify "on larger width than xxx" do force display:table-cell; ?
I don't want to use jQuery, and a solution with CSS would be nice.
Just use min-width instead of max-width:
#div_right { display: table-cell; }
#media screen and (min-width: xxx) { #div_right {display: none; } }
Very simple, tells the browser that these rules are to be used if the browser is larger then xxx.
If you want to know everything about #media queries, check out the Mozilla Docs On It.
Could be very helpful to you.
To see it in action, see this JSFiddle
[EDIT]
As noted in the other answer, if you are using jquery, it will override the #media rule.
The correct way to do this, not using !important is to use jquery:
In your js:
$(".menu").show().css("display","block");
This JS shows it as display:block;
Are you using jquery to $.('el').css("display","none") or .hide() the elements? If so jquery will add the style as an inline-style - hence overwriting your media query.
You can try to add !important to your CSS code (the media query) and it might work.
See: http://www.iandevlin.com/blog/2013/05/css/using-important-in-your-media-queries
Also please note the follow rule of thumb:
CSS style is applied in the following hierachy/priority:
!important is always highest priority
The closer styles to your elements will override styles defined before:
inline styles are higher priority
CSS styles are lowest priority
Please check: developer.tizen.org/dev-guide/2.2.1/org.tizen.web.appprogramming/html/guide/w3c_guide/dom_guide/html_priorities_css.htm
Also you might want to use not only min-width, but rather a range like:
#media screen (min-width: xxx) and (max-width: yyy){ }
Check out some standard templates from: http://css-tricks.com/snippets/css/media-queries-for-standard-devices/
It looks like with the new version 3.0 I have to set the class names of an image to col-lg-4 col-sm-4 col-4 if the image is part of div with the same class names to make the image responsive with all breakpoints.
In version 2 the images CSS properties inherited by default the parent's div properties.
Is this correct?
Bootstrap 4
For Bootstrap 4 use Sass (SCSS):
// make images responisve by default
img {
#extend .img-fluid;
}
answer updated for version 3
Bootstrap 3 has a special class for responsive images (set max-width to 100%). This class is defined as:
.img-responsive {
display: block;
height: auto;
max-width: 100%;
}
Note img tag gets by default:
img {
vertical-align: middle;
border: 0;
page-break-inside: avoid;
max-width: 100% !important;
}
So use class="img-responsive" to make your images responsive.
To make all images responsive by default:
css: add the code below under the bootstrap css:
img {
display: block;
height: auto;
max-width: 100%;
}
less: add the code below in your mixins.less:
img {
&:extend(.img-responsive);
}
Note: requires Less 1.4.0. see: https://stackoverflow.com/a/15573240/1596547
Carousel
img tags inside a carousel are responsive by default
Semantic rules
See also the answer of #its-me (https://stackoverflow.com/a/18653778/1596547). Using the above to make all your images responsive by default turns your images to block level elements. Block level elements are not allowed in paragraphs (<p>), see: https://stackoverflow.com/a/4291515/1596547
As far as i understand the distinction of block-level vs. inline elements is replaced with a more complex set of content categories. See also: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML/Inline_elemente#Inline_vs._block-level.
So in HTML5 a p tag can contain any phrasing element intermixed with normal character data. (see: http://www.w3.org/TR/html-markup/p.html) The img tag is such a phrasing element. The img tag's default value for the display property is indeed inline-block. Changing the display property to block does not violate any of the preceding rules.
Block level elements (display:block) take all the available space of their parent, which seems exactly what you expect for responsive images. So setting display: block; seems a reasonable choice, which has to be preferred above the inline-block declaration.
Images inside p elements which require inline-block as suggest by #its-me (https://stackoverflow.com/a/18653778/1596547) should maybe not be responsive at all.
Excellent suggestion by #BassJobsen, but I'd use display: inline-block; instead of display: block; as that feels more semantic 1 (which means you can be a bit more sure you are not messing up somewhere else).
So, mine would look like this:
img {
display: inline-block;
height: auto;
max-width: 100%;
}
Please do let me know if my understanding is flawed. :)
[1]: For one, images are almost always wrapped in a block-level element if that's the use case; and then again, we also use images in elements like paragraphs (p), where an inline-block would be more appropriate than a block element.
Got here after trying to figure out if it's safe to apply img-responsive for all images.
The answer by #its_me led me to think that it isn't safe to apply this for images under a p element.
This does not seems to be what the bootstrap team think.
This is why images are not responsive by default in bootstrap3:
The summary is that it breaks a ton of unsuspecting third-party widgets (including Google Maps), which understandably don't anticipate the images within them being forcibly resized to other widths. This is why we rolled back Bootstrap v2's "images are responsive by default" approach in Bootstrap v3 in favor of an explicit .img-responsive class.
https://github.com/twbs/bootstrap/issues/18178#issuecomment-154180107