Develop Reference

how to check if a exact dictionary is in an array? javascript [duplicate]

A strict equality operator will tell you if two object types are equal. However, is there a way to tell if two objects are equal, much like the hash code value in Java?
Stack Overflow question Is there any kind of hashCode function in JavaScript? is similar to this question, but requires a more academic answer. The scenario above demonstrates why it would be necessary to have one, and I'm wondering if there is any equivalent solution.

Why reinvent the wheel? Give Lodash a try. It has a number of must-have functions such as isEqual().
_.isEqual(object, other);
It will brute force check each key value - just like the other examples on this page - using ECMAScript 5 and native optimizations if they're available in the browser.
Note: Previously this answer recommended Underscore.js, but lodash has done a better job of getting bugs fixed and addressing issues with consistency.

The short answer
The simple answer is: No, there is no generic means to determine that an object is equal to another in the sense you mean. The exception is when you are strictly thinking of an object being typeless.
The long answer
The concept is that of an Equals method that compares two different instances of an object to indicate whether they are equal at a value level. However, it is up to the specific type to define how an Equals method should be implemented. An iterative comparison of attributes that have primitive values may not be enough: an object may contain attributes which are not relevant to equality. For example,
function MyClass(a, b)
{
var c;
this.getCLazy = function() {
if (c === undefined) c = a * b // imagine * is really expensive
return c;
}
}
In this above case, c is not really important to determine whether any two instances of MyClass are equal, only a and b are important. In some cases c might vary between instances and yet not be significant during comparison.
Note this issue applies when members may themselves also be instances of a type and these each would all be required to have a means of determining equality.
Further complicating things is that in JavaScript the distinction between data and method is blurred.
An object may reference a method that is to be called as an event handler, and this would likely not be considered part of its 'value state'. Whereas another object may well be assigned a function that performs an important calculation and thereby makes this instance different from others simply because it references a different function.
What about an object that has one of its existing prototype methods overridden by another function? Could it still be considered equal to another instance that it otherwise identical? That question can only be answered in each specific case for each type.
As stated earlier, the exception would be a strictly typeless object. In which case the only sensible choice is an iterative and recursive comparison of each member. Even then one has to ask what is the 'value' of a function?

The default equality operator in JavaScript for Objects yields true when they refer to the same location in memory.
var x = {};
var y = {};
var z = x;
x === y; // => false
x === z; // => true
If you require a different equality operator you'll need to add an equals(other) method, or something like it to your classes and the specifics of your problem domain will determine what exactly that means.
Here's a playing card example:
function Card(rank, suit) {
this.rank = rank;
this.suit = suit;
this.equals = function(other) {
return other.rank == this.rank && other.suit == this.suit;
};
}
var queenOfClubs = new Card(12, "C");
var kingOfSpades = new Card(13, "S");
queenOfClubs.equals(kingOfSpades); // => false
kingOfSpades.equals(new Card(13, "S")); // => true

Short functional deepEqual implementation:
function deepEqual(x, y) {
return (x && y && typeof x === 'object' && typeof y === 'object') ?
(Object.keys(x).length === Object.keys(y).length) &&
Object.keys(x).reduce(function(isEqual, key) {
return isEqual && deepEqual(x[key], y[key]);
}, true) : (x === y);
}
Edit: version 2, using jib's suggestion and ES6 arrow functions:
function deepEqual(x, y) {
const ok = Object.keys, tx = typeof x, ty = typeof y;
return x && y && tx === 'object' && tx === ty ? (
ok(x).length === ok(y).length &&
ok(x).every(key => deepEqual(x[key], y[key]))
) : (x === y);
}

This is my version. It is using new Object.keys feature that is introduced in ES5 and ideas/tests from +, + and +:
function objectEquals(x, y) {
'use strict';
if (x === null || x === undefined || y === null || y === undefined) { return x === y; }
// after this just checking type of one would be enough
if (x.constructor !== y.constructor) { return false; }
// if they are functions, they should exactly refer to same one (because of closures)
if (x instanceof Function) { return x === y; }
// if they are regexps, they should exactly refer to same one (it is hard to better equality check on current ES)
if (x instanceof RegExp) { return x === y; }
if (x === y || x.valueOf() === y.valueOf()) { return true; }
if (Array.isArray(x) && x.length !== y.length) { return false; }
// if they are dates, they must had equal valueOf
if (x instanceof Date) { return false; }
// if they are strictly equal, they both need to be object at least
if (!(x instanceof Object)) { return false; }
if (!(y instanceof Object)) { return false; }
// recursive object equality check
var p = Object.keys(x);
return Object.keys(y).every(function (i) { return p.indexOf(i) !== -1; }) &&
p.every(function (i) { return objectEquals(x[i], y[i]); });
}
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
/// The borrowed tests, run them by clicking "Run code snippet"
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
var printResult = function (x) {
if (x) { document.write('<div style="color: green;">Passed</div>'); }
else { document.write('<div style="color: red;">Failed</div>'); }
};
var assert = { isTrue: function (x) { printResult(x); }, isFalse: function (x) { printResult(!x); } }
assert.isTrue(objectEquals(null,null));
assert.isFalse(objectEquals(null,undefined));
assert.isFalse(objectEquals(/abc/, /abc/));
assert.isFalse(objectEquals(/abc/, /123/));
var r = /abc/;
assert.isTrue(objectEquals(r, r));
assert.isTrue(objectEquals("hi","hi"));
assert.isTrue(objectEquals(5,5));
assert.isFalse(objectEquals(5,10));
assert.isTrue(objectEquals([],[]));
assert.isTrue(objectEquals([1,2],[1,2]));
assert.isFalse(objectEquals([1,2],[2,1]));
assert.isFalse(objectEquals([1,2],[1,2,3]));
assert.isTrue(objectEquals({},{}));
assert.isTrue(objectEquals({a:1,b:2},{a:1,b:2}));
assert.isTrue(objectEquals({a:1,b:2},{b:2,a:1}));
assert.isFalse(objectEquals({a:1,b:2},{a:1,b:3}));
assert.isTrue(objectEquals({1:{name:"mhc",age:28}, 2:{name:"arb",age:26}},{1:{name:"mhc",age:28}, 2:{name:"arb",age:26}}));
assert.isFalse(objectEquals({1:{name:"mhc",age:28}, 2:{name:"arb",age:26}},{1:{name:"mhc",age:28}, 2:{name:"arb",age:27}}));
Object.prototype.equals = function (obj) { return objectEquals(this, obj); };
var assertFalse = assert.isFalse,
assertTrue = assert.isTrue;
assertFalse({}.equals(null));
assertFalse({}.equals(undefined));
assertTrue("hi".equals("hi"));
assertTrue(new Number(5).equals(5));
assertFalse(new Number(5).equals(10));
assertFalse(new Number(1).equals("1"));
assertTrue([].equals([]));
assertTrue([1,2].equals([1,2]));
assertFalse([1,2].equals([2,1]));
assertFalse([1,2].equals([1,2,3]));
assertTrue(new Date("2011-03-31").equals(new Date("2011-03-31")));
assertFalse(new Date("2011-03-31").equals(new Date("1970-01-01")));
assertTrue({}.equals({}));
assertTrue({a:1,b:2}.equals({a:1,b:2}));
assertTrue({a:1,b:2}.equals({b:2,a:1}));
assertFalse({a:1,b:2}.equals({a:1,b:3}));
assertTrue({1:{name:"mhc",age:28}, 2:{name:"arb",age:26}}.equals({1:{name:"mhc",age:28}, 2:{name:"arb",age:26}}));
assertFalse({1:{name:"mhc",age:28}, 2:{name:"arb",age:26}}.equals({1:{name:"mhc",age:28}, 2:{name:"arb",age:27}}));
var a = {a: 'text', b:[0,1]};
var b = {a: 'text', b:[0,1]};
var c = {a: 'text', b: 0};
var d = {a: 'text', b: false};
var e = {a: 'text', b:[1,0]};
var i = {
a: 'text',
c: {
b: [1, 0]
}
};
var j = {
a: 'text',
c: {
b: [1, 0]
}
};
var k = {a: 'text', b: null};
var l = {a: 'text', b: undefined};
assertTrue(a.equals(b));
assertFalse(a.equals(c));
assertFalse(c.equals(d));
assertFalse(a.equals(e));
assertTrue(i.equals(j));
assertFalse(d.equals(k));
assertFalse(k.equals(l));
// from comments on stackoverflow post
assert.isFalse(objectEquals([1, 2, undefined], [1, 2]));
assert.isFalse(objectEquals([1, 2, 3], { 0: 1, 1: 2, 2: 3 }));
assert.isFalse(objectEquals(new Date(1234), 1234));
// no two different function is equal really, they capture their context variables
// so even if they have same toString(), they won't have same functionality
var func = function (x) { return true; };
var func2 = function (x) { return true; };
assert.isTrue(objectEquals(func, func));
assert.isFalse(objectEquals(func, func2));
assert.isTrue(objectEquals({ a: { b: func } }, { a: { b: func } }));
assert.isFalse(objectEquals({ a: { b: func } }, { a: { b: func2 } }));

If you are working in AngularJS, the angular.equals function will determine if two objects are equal. In Ember.js use isEqual.
angular.equals - See the docs or source for more on this method. It does a deep compare on arrays too.
Ember.js isEqual - See the docs or source for more on this method. It does not do a deep compare on arrays.
var purple = [{"purple": "drank"}];
var drank = [{"purple": "drank"}];
if(angular.equals(purple, drank)) {
document.write('got dat');
}
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/angularjs/1.4.5/angular.min.js"></script>

If you are using a JSON library, you can encode each object as JSON, then compare the resulting strings for equality.
var obj1={test:"value"};
var obj2={test:"value2"};
alert(JSON.encode(obj1)===JSON.encode(obj2));
NOTE: While this answer will work in many cases, as several people have pointed out in the comments it's problematic for a variety of reasons. In pretty much all cases you'll want to find a more robust solution.

For those of you using Node, there is a convenient method called isDeepStrictEqual on the native util library that can achieve this.
const util = require('util');
const obj1 = {
foo: "bar",
baz: [1, 2]
};
const obj2 = {
foo: "bar",
baz: [1, 2]
};
obj1 == obj2 // false
util.isDeepStrictEqual(obj1, obj2) // true
https://nodejs.org/api/util.html#util_util_isdeepstrictequal_val1_val2

In Node.js, you can use its native require("assert").deepStrictEqual. More info:
http://nodejs.org/api/assert.html
For example:
var assert = require("assert");
assert.deepStrictEqual({a:1, b:2}, {a:1, b:3}); // will throw AssertionError
Another example that returns true / false instead of returning errors:
var assert = require("assert");
function deepEqual(a, b) {
try {
assert.deepEqual(a, b);
} catch (error) {
if (error.name === "AssertionError") {
return false;
}
throw error;
}
return true;
};

Are you trying to test if two objects are the equal? ie: their properties are equal?
If this is the case, you'll probably have noticed this situation:
var a = { foo : "bar" };
var b = { foo : "bar" };
alert (a == b ? "Equal" : "Not equal");
// "Not equal"
you might have to do something like this:
function objectEquals(obj1, obj2) {
for (var i in obj1) {
if (obj1.hasOwnProperty(i)) {
if (!obj2.hasOwnProperty(i)) return false;
if (obj1[i] != obj2[i]) return false;
}
}
for (var i in obj2) {
if (obj2.hasOwnProperty(i)) {
if (!obj1.hasOwnProperty(i)) return false;
if (obj1[i] != obj2[i]) return false;
}
}
return true;
}
Obviously that function could do with quite a bit of optimisation, and the ability to do deep checking (to handle nested objects: var a = { foo : { fu : "bar" } }) but you get the idea.
As FOR pointed out, you might have to adapt this for your own purposes, eg: different classes may have different definitions of "equal". If you're just working with plain objects, the above may suffice, otherwise a custom MyClass.equals() function may be the way to go.

Simplest and logical solutions for comparing everything Like Object, Array, String, Int...
JSON.stringify({a: val1}) === JSON.stringify({a: val2})
Note:
you need to replace val1and val2 with your Object
for the object, you have to sort(by key) recursively for both side objects

If you have a deep copy function handy, you can use the following trick to still use JSON.stringify while matching the order of properties:
function equals(obj1, obj2) {
function _equals(obj1, obj2) {
return JSON.stringify(obj1)
=== JSON.stringify($.extend(true, {}, obj1, obj2));
}
return _equals(obj1, obj2) && _equals(obj2, obj1);
}
Demo: http://jsfiddle.net/CU3vb/3/
Rationale:
Since the properties of obj1 are copied to the clone one by one, their order in the clone will be preserved. And when the properties of obj2 are copied to the clone, since properties already existing in obj1 will simply be overwritten, their orders in the clone will be preserved.

This question has more than 30 answers already. I am going to summarize and explain them (with a "my father" analogy) and add my suggested solution.
You have 4+1 classes of solutions:
1) Use a hacky incomplete quick one-liner
Good if you are in a rush and 99% correctness works.
Examples of this is, JSON.stringify() suggested by Pratik Bhalodiya, or JSON.encode by Joel Anair, or .toString(), or other methods that transform your objects into a String and then compare the two Strings using === character by character.
The drawback, however, is that there is no globally standard unique representation of an Object in String. e.g. { a: 5, b: 8} and {b: 8 and a: 5 } are equal.
Pros: Fast, quick.
Cons: Hopefully works! It will not work if the environment/browser/engine memorizes the ordering for objects (e.g. Chrome/V8) and the order of the keys are different (Thanks to Eksapsy.) So, not guaranteed at all. Performance wouldn't be great either in large objects.
My Father Analogy
When I am talking about my father, "my tall handsome father" and "my handsome tall father" are the same person! But the two strings are not the same.
Note that there is actually a correct (standard way) order of adjectives in English grammar, which says it should be a "handsome tall man," but you are risking your competency if you blindly assume Javascript engine of iOS 8 Safari is also abiding the same grammar, blindly! #WelcomeToJavascriptNonStandards
2) Write your own DIY recursive function
Good if you are learning.
Examples are atmin's solution.
The biggest disadvantage is you will definitely miss some edge cases. Have you considered a self-reference in object values? Have you considered NaN? Have you considered two objects that have the same ownProperties but different prototypical parents?
I would only encourage people to do this if they are practicing and the code is not going to go in production. That's the only case that reinventing the wheel has justifications.
Pros: Learning opportunity.
Cons: Not reliable. Takes time and concerns.
My Father Analogy
It's like assuming if my dad's name is "John Smith" and his birthday is "1/1/1970", then anyone whose name is "John Smith" and is born on "1/1/1970" is my father.
That's usually the case, but what if there are two "John Smith"s born on that day? If you think you will consider their height, then that's increasing the accuracy but still not a perfect comparison.
2.1 You limited scope DIY comparator
Rather than going on a wild chase of checking all the properties recursively, one might consider checking only "a limited" number of properties. For instance, if the objects are Users, you can compare their emailAddress field.
It's still not a perfect one, but the benefits over solution #2 are:
It's predictable, and it's less likely to crash.
You are driving the "definition" of equality, rather than relying on a wild form and shape of the Object and its prototype and nested properties.
3) Use a library version of equal function
Good if you need a production-level quality, and you cannot change the design of the system.
Examples are _.equal of lodash, already in coolaj86's answer or Angular's or Ember's as mentioned in Tony Harvey's answer or Node's by Rafael Xavier.
Pros: It's what everyone else does.
Cons: External dependency, which can cost you extra memory/CPU/Security concerns, even a little bit. Also, can still miss some edge cases (e.g. whether two objects having same ownProperties but different prototypical parents should be considered the same or not.) Finally, you might be unintentionally band-aiding an underlying design problem with this; just saying!
My Father Analogy
It's like paying an agency to find my biological father, based on his phone, name, address, etc.
It's gonna cost more, and it's probably more accurate than myself running the background check, but doesn't cover edge cases like when my father is immigrant/asylum and his birthday is unknown!
4) Use an IDentifier in the Object
Good if you [still] can change the design of the system (objects you are dealing with) and you want your code to last long.
It's not applicable in all cases, and might not be very performant. However, it's a very reliable solution, if you can make it.
The solution is, every object in the system will have a unique identifier along with all the other properties. The uniqueness of the identifier will be guaranteed at the time of generation. And you will use this ID (also known as UUID/GUID -- Globally/Universally Unique Identifier) when it comes to comparing two objects. i.e. They are equal if and only if these IDs are equal.
The IDs can be simple auto_incremental numbers, or a string generated via a library (advised) or a piece of code. All you need to do is make sure it's always unique, which in case of auto_incremental it can be built-in, or in case of UUID, can be checked will all existing values (e.g. MySQL's UNIQUE column attribute) or simply (if coming from a library) be relied upon giving the extremely low likelihood of a collision.
Note that you also need to store the ID with the object at all times (to guarantee its uniqueness), and computing it in real-time might not be the best approach.
Pros: Reliable, efficient, not dirty, modern.
Cons: Needs extra space. Might need a redesign of the system.
My Father Analogy
It's like known my father's Social Security Number is 911-345-9283, so anyone who has this SSN is my father, and anyone who claims to be my father must have this SSN.
Conclusion
I personally prefer solution #4 (ID) over them all for accuracy and reliability. If it's not possible I'd go with #2.1 for predictability, and then #3. If neither is possible, #2 and finally #1.

var object1 = {name: "humza" , gender : "male", age: 23}
var object2 = {name: "humza" , gender : "male", age: 23}
var result = Object.keys(object1).every((key) => object1[key] === object2[key])
Result will be true if object1 has same values on object2.

I use this comparable function to produce copies of my objects that are JSON comparable:
var comparable = o => (typeof o != 'object' || !o)? o :
Object.keys(o).sort().reduce((c, key) => (c[key] = comparable(o[key]), c), {});
// Demo:
var a = { a: 1, c: 4, b: [2, 3], d: { e: '5', f: null } };
var b = { b: [2, 3], c: 4, d: { f: null, e: '5' }, a: 1 };
console.log(JSON.stringify(comparable(a)));
console.log(JSON.stringify(comparable(b)));
console.log(JSON.stringify(comparable(a)) == JSON.stringify(comparable(b)));
<div id="div"></div>
Comes in handy in tests (most test frameworks have an is function). E.g.
is(JSON.stringify(comparable(x)), JSON.stringify(comparable(y)), 'x must match y');
If a difference is caught, strings get logged, making differences spottable:
x must match y
got {"a":1,"b":{"0":2,"1":3},"c":7,"d":{"e":"5","f":null}},
expected {"a":1,"b":{"0":2,"1":3},"c":4,"d":{"e":"5","f":null}}.

Heres's a solution in ES6/ES2015 using a functional-style approach:
const typeOf = x =>
({}).toString
.call(x)
.match(/\[object (\w+)\]/)[1]
function areSimilar(a, b) {
const everyKey = f => Object.keys(a).every(f)
switch(typeOf(a)) {
case 'Array':
return a.length === b.length &&
everyKey(k => areSimilar(a.sort()[k], b.sort()[k]));
case 'Object':
return Object.keys(a).length === Object.keys(b).length &&
everyKey(k => areSimilar(a[k], b[k]));
default:
return a === b;
}
}
demo available here

I don't know if anyone's posted anything similar to this, but here's a function I made to check for object equalities.
function objectsAreEqual(a, b) {
for (var prop in a) {
if (a.hasOwnProperty(prop)) {
if (b.hasOwnProperty(prop)) {
if (typeof a[prop] === 'object') {
if (!objectsAreEqual(a[prop], b[prop])) return false;
} else {
if (a[prop] !== b[prop]) return false;
}
} else {
return false;
}
}
}
return true;
}
Also, it's recursive, so it can also check for deep equality, if that's what you call it.

ES6: The minimum code I could get it done, is this. It do deep comparison recursively by stringifying all key value array sorted representing the object, the only limitation is no methods or symbols are compare.
const compareObjects = (a, b) => {
let s = (o) => Object.entries(o).sort().map(i => {
if(i[1] instanceof Object) i[1] = s(i[1]);
return i
})
return JSON.stringify(s(a)) === JSON.stringify(s(b))
}
console.log(compareObjects({b:4,a:{b:1}}, {a:{b:1},b:4}));
IMPORTANT: This function is doing a JSON.stringfy in an ARRAY with the keys sorted and NOT in the object it self:
["a", ["b", 1]]
["b", 4]

Below is a short implementation which uses JSON.stringify but sorts the keys as #Jor suggested here.
Some tests were taken from the answer of #EbrahimByagowi here.
Of course, by using JSON.stringify, the solution is limited to JSON-serializable types (a string, a number, a JSON object, an array, a boolean, null). Objects like Date, Function, etc. are not supported.
function objectEquals(obj1, obj2) {
const JSONstringifyOrder = obj => {
const keys = {};
JSON.stringify(obj, (key, value) => {
keys[key] = null;
return value;
});
return JSON.stringify(obj, Object.keys(keys).sort());
};
return JSONstringifyOrder(obj1) === JSONstringifyOrder(obj2);
}
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
/// The borrowed tests, run them by clicking "Run code snippet"
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
var printResult = function (x) {
if (x) { document.write('<div style="color: green;">Passed</div>'); }
else { document.write('<div style="color: red;">Failed</div>'); }
};
var assert = { isTrue: function (x) { printResult(x); }, isFalse: function (x) { printResult(!x); } }
assert.isTrue(objectEquals("hi","hi"));
assert.isTrue(objectEquals(5,5));
assert.isFalse(objectEquals(5,10));
assert.isTrue(objectEquals([],[]));
assert.isTrue(objectEquals([1,2],[1,2]));
assert.isFalse(objectEquals([1,2],[2,1]));
assert.isFalse(objectEquals([1,2],[1,2,3]));
assert.isTrue(objectEquals({},{}));
assert.isTrue(objectEquals({a:1,b:2},{a:1,b:2}));
assert.isTrue(objectEquals({a:1,b:2},{b:2,a:1}));
assert.isFalse(objectEquals({a:1,b:2},{a:1,b:3}));
assert.isTrue(objectEquals({1:{name:"mhc",age:28}, 2:{name:"arb",age:26}},{1:{name:"mhc",age:28}, 2:{name:"arb",age:26}}));
assert.isFalse(objectEquals({1:{name:"mhc",age:28}, 2:{name:"arb",age:26}},{1:{name:"mhc",age:28}, 2:{name:"arb",age:27}}));

Just wanted to contribute my version of objects comparison utilizing some es6 features. It doesn't take an order into account. After converting all if/else's to ternary I've came with following:
function areEqual(obj1, obj2) {
return Object.keys(obj1).every(key => {
return obj2.hasOwnProperty(key) ?
typeof obj1[key] === 'object' ?
areEqual(obj1[key], obj2[key]) :
obj1[key] === obj2[key] :
false;
}
)
}

you can use _.isEqual(obj1, obj2) from the underscore.js library.
Here is an example:
var stooge = {name: 'moe', luckyNumbers: [13, 27, 34]};
var clone = {name: 'moe', luckyNumbers: [13, 27, 34]};
stooge == clone;
=> false
_.isEqual(stooge, clone);
=> true
See the official documentation from here: http://underscorejs.org/#isEqual

Assuming that the order of the properties in the object is not changed.
JSON.stringify() works for deep and non-deep both types of objects, not very sure of performance aspects:
var object1 = {
key: "value"
};
var object2 = {
key: "value"
};
var object3 = {
key: "no value"
};
console.log('object1 and object2 are equal: ', JSON.stringify(object1) === JSON.stringify(object2));
console.log('object2 and object3 are equal: ', JSON.stringify(object2) === JSON.stringify(object3));

let std1 = {
name: "Abhijeet",
roll: 1
}
let std2 = {
name: "Siddharth",
roll: 2
}
console.log(JSON.stringify(std1) === JSON.stringify(std2))

One easy way I have found to compare the values of two javascript objects while ignoring property order is with the JSON stringify replacer function:
const compareReplacer = (key, value) => {
if(typeof value === 'object' && !(value instanceof Array))
return Object.entries(value).sort();
return value;
}
export const compareObjects = (a, b) => JSON.stringify(a, compareReplacer) === JSON.stringify(b, compareReplacer);
This will order the properties at every step of the way so that the string result will be invariant to property order. Some one has probably done this before but I just thought I would share it incase not :).

EDIT: This method is quite flawed, and is rife with its own issues. I don't recommend it, and would appreciate some down-votes! It is problematic because 1) Some things can not be compared (i.e. functions) because they can not be serialized, 2) It isn't a very fast method of comparing, 3) It has ordering issues, 4) It can have collision issues/false positives if not properly implemented, 5) It can't check for "exactness" (===), and instead is based of value equality, which is oftentimes not what is desired in a comparison method.
A simple solution to this issue that many people don't realize is to sort the JSON strings (per character). This is also usually faster than the other solutions mentioned here:
function areEqual(obj1, obj2) {
var a = JSON.stringify(obj1), b = JSON.stringify(obj2);
if (!a) a = '';
if (!b) b = '';
return (a.split('').sort().join('') == b.split('').sort().join(''));
}
Another useful thing about this method is you can filter comparisons by passing a "replacer" function to the JSON.stringify functions (https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/JSON/stringify#Example_of_using_replacer_parameter). The following will only compare all objects keys that are named "derp":
function areEqual(obj1, obj2, filter) {
var a = JSON.stringify(obj1, filter), b = JSON.stringify(obj2, filter);
if (!a) a = '';
if (!b) b = '';
return (a.split('').sort().join('') == b.split('').sort().join(''));
}
var equal = areEqual(obj1, obj2, function(key, value) {
return (key === 'derp') ? value : undefined;
});

Needing a more generic object comparison function than had been posted, I cooked up the following. Critique appreciated...
Object.prototype.equals = function(iObj) {
if (this.constructor !== iObj.constructor)
return false;
var aMemberCount = 0;
for (var a in this) {
if (!this.hasOwnProperty(a))
continue;
if (typeof this[a] === 'object' && typeof iObj[a] === 'object' ? !this[a].equals(iObj[a]) : this[a] !== iObj[a])
return false;
++aMemberCount;
}
for (var a in iObj)
if (iObj.hasOwnProperty(a))
--aMemberCount;
return aMemberCount ? false : true;
}

If you are comparing JSON objects you can use https://github.com/mirek/node-rus-diff
npm install rus-diff
Usage:
a = {foo:{bar:1}}
b = {foo:{bar:1}}
c = {foo:{bar:2}}
var rusDiff = require('rus-diff').rusDiff
console.log(rusDiff(a, b)) // -> false, meaning a and b are equal
console.log(rusDiff(a, c)) // -> { '$set': { 'foo.bar': 2 } }
If two objects are different, a MongoDB compatible {$rename:{...}, $unset:{...}, $set:{...}} like object is returned.

I faced the same problem and deccided to write my own solution. But because I want to also compare Arrays with Objects and vice-versa, I crafted a generic solution. I decided to add the functions to the prototype, but one can easily rewrite them to standalone functions. Here is the code:
Array.prototype.equals = Object.prototype.equals = function(b) {
var ar = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(b));
var err = false;
for(var key in this) {
if(this.hasOwnProperty(key)) {
var found = ar.find(this[key]);
if(found > -1) {
if(Object.prototype.toString.call(ar) === "[object Object]") {
delete ar[Object.keys(ar)[found]];
}
else {
ar.splice(found, 1);
}
}
else {
err = true;
break;
}
}
};
if(Object.keys(ar).length > 0 || err) {
return false;
}
return true;
}
Array.prototype.find = Object.prototype.find = function(v) {
var f = -1;
for(var i in this) {
if(this.hasOwnProperty(i)) {
if(Object.prototype.toString.call(this[i]) === "[object Array]" || Object.prototype.toString.call(this[i]) === "[object Object]") {
if(this[i].equals(v)) {
f = (typeof(i) == "number") ? i : Object.keys(this).indexOf(i);
}
}
else if(this[i] === v) {
f = (typeof(i) == "number") ? i : Object.keys(this).indexOf(i);
}
}
}
return f;
}
This Algorithm is split into two parts; The equals function itself and a function to find the numeric index of a property in an array / object. The find function is only needed because indexof only finds numbers and strings and no objects .
One can call it like this:
({a: 1, b: "h"}).equals({a: 1, b: "h"});
The function either returns true or false, in this case true.
The algorithm als allows comparison between very complex objects:
({a: 1, b: "hello", c: ["w", "o", "r", "l", "d", {answer1: "should be", answer2: true}]}).equals({b: "hello", a: 1, c: ["w", "d", "o", "r", {answer1: "should be", answer2: true}, "l"]})
The upper example will return true, even tho the properties have a different ordering. One small detail to look out for: This code also checks for the same type of two variables, so "3" is not the same as 3.

stringify both objects and compare
return (JSON.stringify(obj1) === JSON.stringify(obj2))
This will return true or false

I'd advise against hashing or serialization (as the JSON solution suggest). If you need to test if two objects are equal, then you need to define what equals means. It could be that all data members in both objects match, or it could be that must the memory locations match (meaning both variables reference the same object in memory), or may be that only one data member in each object must match.
Recently I developed an object whose constructor creates a new id (starting from 1 and incrementing by 1) each time an instance is created. This object has an isEqual function that compares that id value with the id value of another object and returns true if they match.
In that case I defined "equal" as meaning the the id values match. Given that each instance has a unique id this could be used to enforce the idea that matching objects also occupy the same memory location. Although that is not necessary.

Includes() does not work in Vue! is there something else to use? [duplicate]

A strict equality operator will tell you if two object types are equal. However, is there a way to tell if two objects are equal, much like the hash code value in Java?
Stack Overflow question Is there any kind of hashCode function in JavaScript? is similar to this question, but requires a more academic answer. The scenario above demonstrates why it would be necessary to have one, and I'm wondering if there is any equivalent solution.

Why reinvent the wheel? Give Lodash a try. It has a number of must-have functions such as isEqual().
_.isEqual(object, other);
It will brute force check each key value - just like the other examples on this page - using ECMAScript 5 and native optimizations if they're available in the browser.
Note: Previously this answer recommended Underscore.js, but lodash has done a better job of getting bugs fixed and addressing issues with consistency.

The short answer
The simple answer is: No, there is no generic means to determine that an object is equal to another in the sense you mean. The exception is when you are strictly thinking of an object being typeless.
The long answer
The concept is that of an Equals method that compares two different instances of an object to indicate whether they are equal at a value level. However, it is up to the specific type to define how an Equals method should be implemented. An iterative comparison of attributes that have primitive values may not be enough: an object may contain attributes which are not relevant to equality. For example,
function MyClass(a, b)
{
var c;
this.getCLazy = function() {
if (c === undefined) c = a * b // imagine * is really expensive
return c;
}
}
In this above case, c is not really important to determine whether any two instances of MyClass are equal, only a and b are important. In some cases c might vary between instances and yet not be significant during comparison.
Note this issue applies when members may themselves also be instances of a type and these each would all be required to have a means of determining equality.
Further complicating things is that in JavaScript the distinction between data and method is blurred.
An object may reference a method that is to be called as an event handler, and this would likely not be considered part of its 'value state'. Whereas another object may well be assigned a function that performs an important calculation and thereby makes this instance different from others simply because it references a different function.
What about an object that has one of its existing prototype methods overridden by another function? Could it still be considered equal to another instance that it otherwise identical? That question can only be answered in each specific case for each type.
As stated earlier, the exception would be a strictly typeless object. In which case the only sensible choice is an iterative and recursive comparison of each member. Even then one has to ask what is the 'value' of a function?

The default equality operator in JavaScript for Objects yields true when they refer to the same location in memory.
var x = {};
var y = {};
var z = x;
x === y; // => false
x === z; // => true
If you require a different equality operator you'll need to add an equals(other) method, or something like it to your classes and the specifics of your problem domain will determine what exactly that means.
Here's a playing card example:
function Card(rank, suit) {
this.rank = rank;
this.suit = suit;
this.equals = function(other) {
return other.rank == this.rank && other.suit == this.suit;
};
}
var queenOfClubs = new Card(12, "C");
var kingOfSpades = new Card(13, "S");
queenOfClubs.equals(kingOfSpades); // => false
kingOfSpades.equals(new Card(13, "S")); // => true

Short functional deepEqual implementation:
function deepEqual(x, y) {
return (x && y && typeof x === 'object' && typeof y === 'object') ?
(Object.keys(x).length === Object.keys(y).length) &&
Object.keys(x).reduce(function(isEqual, key) {
return isEqual && deepEqual(x[key], y[key]);
}, true) : (x === y);
}
Edit: version 2, using jib's suggestion and ES6 arrow functions:
function deepEqual(x, y) {
const ok = Object.keys, tx = typeof x, ty = typeof y;
return x && y && tx === 'object' && tx === ty ? (
ok(x).length === ok(y).length &&
ok(x).every(key => deepEqual(x[key], y[key]))
) : (x === y);
}

This is my version. It is using new Object.keys feature that is introduced in ES5 and ideas/tests from +, + and +:
function objectEquals(x, y) {
'use strict';
if (x === null || x === undefined || y === null || y === undefined) { return x === y; }
// after this just checking type of one would be enough
if (x.constructor !== y.constructor) { return false; }
// if they are functions, they should exactly refer to same one (because of closures)
if (x instanceof Function) { return x === y; }
// if they are regexps, they should exactly refer to same one (it is hard to better equality check on current ES)
if (x instanceof RegExp) { return x === y; }
if (x === y || x.valueOf() === y.valueOf()) { return true; }
if (Array.isArray(x) && x.length !== y.length) { return false; }
// if they are dates, they must had equal valueOf
if (x instanceof Date) { return false; }
// if they are strictly equal, they both need to be object at least
if (!(x instanceof Object)) { return false; }
if (!(y instanceof Object)) { return false; }
// recursive object equality check
var p = Object.keys(x);
return Object.keys(y).every(function (i) { return p.indexOf(i) !== -1; }) &&
p.every(function (i) { return objectEquals(x[i], y[i]); });
}
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
/// The borrowed tests, run them by clicking "Run code snippet"
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
var printResult = function (x) {
if (x) { document.write('<div style="color: green;">Passed</div>'); }
else { document.write('<div style="color: red;">Failed</div>'); }
};
var assert = { isTrue: function (x) { printResult(x); }, isFalse: function (x) { printResult(!x); } }
assert.isTrue(objectEquals(null,null));
assert.isFalse(objectEquals(null,undefined));
assert.isFalse(objectEquals(/abc/, /abc/));
assert.isFalse(objectEquals(/abc/, /123/));
var r = /abc/;
assert.isTrue(objectEquals(r, r));
assert.isTrue(objectEquals("hi","hi"));
assert.isTrue(objectEquals(5,5));
assert.isFalse(objectEquals(5,10));
assert.isTrue(objectEquals([],[]));
assert.isTrue(objectEquals([1,2],[1,2]));
assert.isFalse(objectEquals([1,2],[2,1]));
assert.isFalse(objectEquals([1,2],[1,2,3]));
assert.isTrue(objectEquals({},{}));
assert.isTrue(objectEquals({a:1,b:2},{a:1,b:2}));
assert.isTrue(objectEquals({a:1,b:2},{b:2,a:1}));
assert.isFalse(objectEquals({a:1,b:2},{a:1,b:3}));
assert.isTrue(objectEquals({1:{name:"mhc",age:28}, 2:{name:"arb",age:26}},{1:{name:"mhc",age:28}, 2:{name:"arb",age:26}}));
assert.isFalse(objectEquals({1:{name:"mhc",age:28}, 2:{name:"arb",age:26}},{1:{name:"mhc",age:28}, 2:{name:"arb",age:27}}));
Object.prototype.equals = function (obj) { return objectEquals(this, obj); };
var assertFalse = assert.isFalse,
assertTrue = assert.isTrue;
assertFalse({}.equals(null));
assertFalse({}.equals(undefined));
assertTrue("hi".equals("hi"));
assertTrue(new Number(5).equals(5));
assertFalse(new Number(5).equals(10));
assertFalse(new Number(1).equals("1"));
assertTrue([].equals([]));
assertTrue([1,2].equals([1,2]));
assertFalse([1,2].equals([2,1]));
assertFalse([1,2].equals([1,2,3]));
assertTrue(new Date("2011-03-31").equals(new Date("2011-03-31")));
assertFalse(new Date("2011-03-31").equals(new Date("1970-01-01")));
assertTrue({}.equals({}));
assertTrue({a:1,b:2}.equals({a:1,b:2}));
assertTrue({a:1,b:2}.equals({b:2,a:1}));
assertFalse({a:1,b:2}.equals({a:1,b:3}));
assertTrue({1:{name:"mhc",age:28}, 2:{name:"arb",age:26}}.equals({1:{name:"mhc",age:28}, 2:{name:"arb",age:26}}));
assertFalse({1:{name:"mhc",age:28}, 2:{name:"arb",age:26}}.equals({1:{name:"mhc",age:28}, 2:{name:"arb",age:27}}));
var a = {a: 'text', b:[0,1]};
var b = {a: 'text', b:[0,1]};
var c = {a: 'text', b: 0};
var d = {a: 'text', b: false};
var e = {a: 'text', b:[1,0]};
var i = {
a: 'text',
c: {
b: [1, 0]
}
};
var j = {
a: 'text',
c: {
b: [1, 0]
}
};
var k = {a: 'text', b: null};
var l = {a: 'text', b: undefined};
assertTrue(a.equals(b));
assertFalse(a.equals(c));
assertFalse(c.equals(d));
assertFalse(a.equals(e));
assertTrue(i.equals(j));
assertFalse(d.equals(k));
assertFalse(k.equals(l));
// from comments on stackoverflow post
assert.isFalse(objectEquals([1, 2, undefined], [1, 2]));
assert.isFalse(objectEquals([1, 2, 3], { 0: 1, 1: 2, 2: 3 }));
assert.isFalse(objectEquals(new Date(1234), 1234));
// no two different function is equal really, they capture their context variables
// so even if they have same toString(), they won't have same functionality
var func = function (x) { return true; };
var func2 = function (x) { return true; };
assert.isTrue(objectEquals(func, func));
assert.isFalse(objectEquals(func, func2));
assert.isTrue(objectEquals({ a: { b: func } }, { a: { b: func } }));
assert.isFalse(objectEquals({ a: { b: func } }, { a: { b: func2 } }));

If you are working in AngularJS, the angular.equals function will determine if two objects are equal. In Ember.js use isEqual.
angular.equals - See the docs or source for more on this method. It does a deep compare on arrays too.
Ember.js isEqual - See the docs or source for more on this method. It does not do a deep compare on arrays.
var purple = [{"purple": "drank"}];
var drank = [{"purple": "drank"}];
if(angular.equals(purple, drank)) {
document.write('got dat');
}
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/angularjs/1.4.5/angular.min.js"></script>

If you are using a JSON library, you can encode each object as JSON, then compare the resulting strings for equality.
var obj1={test:"value"};
var obj2={test:"value2"};
alert(JSON.encode(obj1)===JSON.encode(obj2));
NOTE: While this answer will work in many cases, as several people have pointed out in the comments it's problematic for a variety of reasons. In pretty much all cases you'll want to find a more robust solution.

For those of you using Node, there is a convenient method called isDeepStrictEqual on the native util library that can achieve this.
const util = require('util');
const obj1 = {
foo: "bar",
baz: [1, 2]
};
const obj2 = {
foo: "bar",
baz: [1, 2]
};
obj1 == obj2 // false
util.isDeepStrictEqual(obj1, obj2) // true
https://nodejs.org/api/util.html#util_util_isdeepstrictequal_val1_val2

In Node.js, you can use its native require("assert").deepStrictEqual. More info:
http://nodejs.org/api/assert.html
For example:
var assert = require("assert");
assert.deepStrictEqual({a:1, b:2}, {a:1, b:3}); // will throw AssertionError
Another example that returns true / false instead of returning errors:
var assert = require("assert");
function deepEqual(a, b) {
try {
assert.deepEqual(a, b);
} catch (error) {
if (error.name === "AssertionError") {
return false;
}
throw error;
}
return true;
};

Are you trying to test if two objects are the equal? ie: their properties are equal?
If this is the case, you'll probably have noticed this situation:
var a = { foo : "bar" };
var b = { foo : "bar" };
alert (a == b ? "Equal" : "Not equal");
// "Not equal"
you might have to do something like this:
function objectEquals(obj1, obj2) {
for (var i in obj1) {
if (obj1.hasOwnProperty(i)) {
if (!obj2.hasOwnProperty(i)) return false;
if (obj1[i] != obj2[i]) return false;
}
}
for (var i in obj2) {
if (obj2.hasOwnProperty(i)) {
if (!obj1.hasOwnProperty(i)) return false;
if (obj1[i] != obj2[i]) return false;
}
}
return true;
}
Obviously that function could do with quite a bit of optimisation, and the ability to do deep checking (to handle nested objects: var a = { foo : { fu : "bar" } }) but you get the idea.
As FOR pointed out, you might have to adapt this for your own purposes, eg: different classes may have different definitions of "equal". If you're just working with plain objects, the above may suffice, otherwise a custom MyClass.equals() function may be the way to go.

Simplest and logical solutions for comparing everything Like Object, Array, String, Int...
JSON.stringify({a: val1}) === JSON.stringify({a: val2})
Note:
you need to replace val1and val2 with your Object
for the object, you have to sort(by key) recursively for both side objects

If you have a deep copy function handy, you can use the following trick to still use JSON.stringify while matching the order of properties:
function equals(obj1, obj2) {
function _equals(obj1, obj2) {
return JSON.stringify(obj1)
=== JSON.stringify($.extend(true, {}, obj1, obj2));
}
return _equals(obj1, obj2) && _equals(obj2, obj1);
}
Demo: http://jsfiddle.net/CU3vb/3/
Rationale:
Since the properties of obj1 are copied to the clone one by one, their order in the clone will be preserved. And when the properties of obj2 are copied to the clone, since properties already existing in obj1 will simply be overwritten, their orders in the clone will be preserved.

This question has more than 30 answers already. I am going to summarize and explain them (with a "my father" analogy) and add my suggested solution.
You have 4+1 classes of solutions:
1) Use a hacky incomplete quick one-liner
Good if you are in a rush and 99% correctness works.
Examples of this is, JSON.stringify() suggested by Pratik Bhalodiya, or JSON.encode by Joel Anair, or .toString(), or other methods that transform your objects into a String and then compare the two Strings using === character by character.
The drawback, however, is that there is no globally standard unique representation of an Object in String. e.g. { a: 5, b: 8} and {b: 8 and a: 5 } are equal.
Pros: Fast, quick.
Cons: Hopefully works! It will not work if the environment/browser/engine memorizes the ordering for objects (e.g. Chrome/V8) and the order of the keys are different (Thanks to Eksapsy.) So, not guaranteed at all. Performance wouldn't be great either in large objects.
My Father Analogy
When I am talking about my father, "my tall handsome father" and "my handsome tall father" are the same person! But the two strings are not the same.
Note that there is actually a correct (standard way) order of adjectives in English grammar, which says it should be a "handsome tall man," but you are risking your competency if you blindly assume Javascript engine of iOS 8 Safari is also abiding the same grammar, blindly! #WelcomeToJavascriptNonStandards
2) Write your own DIY recursive function
Good if you are learning.
Examples are atmin's solution.
The biggest disadvantage is you will definitely miss some edge cases. Have you considered a self-reference in object values? Have you considered NaN? Have you considered two objects that have the same ownProperties but different prototypical parents?
I would only encourage people to do this if they are practicing and the code is not going to go in production. That's the only case that reinventing the wheel has justifications.
Pros: Learning opportunity.
Cons: Not reliable. Takes time and concerns.
My Father Analogy
It's like assuming if my dad's name is "John Smith" and his birthday is "1/1/1970", then anyone whose name is "John Smith" and is born on "1/1/1970" is my father.
That's usually the case, but what if there are two "John Smith"s born on that day? If you think you will consider their height, then that's increasing the accuracy but still not a perfect comparison.
2.1 You limited scope DIY comparator
Rather than going on a wild chase of checking all the properties recursively, one might consider checking only "a limited" number of properties. For instance, if the objects are Users, you can compare their emailAddress field.
It's still not a perfect one, but the benefits over solution #2 are:
It's predictable, and it's less likely to crash.
You are driving the "definition" of equality, rather than relying on a wild form and shape of the Object and its prototype and nested properties.
3) Use a library version of equal function
Good if you need a production-level quality, and you cannot change the design of the system.
Examples are _.equal of lodash, already in coolaj86's answer or Angular's or Ember's as mentioned in Tony Harvey's answer or Node's by Rafael Xavier.
Pros: It's what everyone else does.
Cons: External dependency, which can cost you extra memory/CPU/Security concerns, even a little bit. Also, can still miss some edge cases (e.g. whether two objects having same ownProperties but different prototypical parents should be considered the same or not.) Finally, you might be unintentionally band-aiding an underlying design problem with this; just saying!
My Father Analogy
It's like paying an agency to find my biological father, based on his phone, name, address, etc.
It's gonna cost more, and it's probably more accurate than myself running the background check, but doesn't cover edge cases like when my father is immigrant/asylum and his birthday is unknown!
4) Use an IDentifier in the Object
Good if you [still] can change the design of the system (objects you are dealing with) and you want your code to last long.
It's not applicable in all cases, and might not be very performant. However, it's a very reliable solution, if you can make it.
The solution is, every object in the system will have a unique identifier along with all the other properties. The uniqueness of the identifier will be guaranteed at the time of generation. And you will use this ID (also known as UUID/GUID -- Globally/Universally Unique Identifier) when it comes to comparing two objects. i.e. They are equal if and only if these IDs are equal.
The IDs can be simple auto_incremental numbers, or a string generated via a library (advised) or a piece of code. All you need to do is make sure it's always unique, which in case of auto_incremental it can be built-in, or in case of UUID, can be checked will all existing values (e.g. MySQL's UNIQUE column attribute) or simply (if coming from a library) be relied upon giving the extremely low likelihood of a collision.
Note that you also need to store the ID with the object at all times (to guarantee its uniqueness), and computing it in real-time might not be the best approach.
Pros: Reliable, efficient, not dirty, modern.
Cons: Needs extra space. Might need a redesign of the system.
My Father Analogy
It's like known my father's Social Security Number is 911-345-9283, so anyone who has this SSN is my father, and anyone who claims to be my father must have this SSN.
Conclusion
I personally prefer solution #4 (ID) over them all for accuracy and reliability. If it's not possible I'd go with #2.1 for predictability, and then #3. If neither is possible, #2 and finally #1.

var object1 = {name: "humza" , gender : "male", age: 23}
var object2 = {name: "humza" , gender : "male", age: 23}
var result = Object.keys(object1).every((key) => object1[key] === object2[key])
Result will be true if object1 has same values on object2.

I use this comparable function to produce copies of my objects that are JSON comparable:
var comparable = o => (typeof o != 'object' || !o)? o :
Object.keys(o).sort().reduce((c, key) => (c[key] = comparable(o[key]), c), {});
// Demo:
var a = { a: 1, c: 4, b: [2, 3], d: { e: '5', f: null } };
var b = { b: [2, 3], c: 4, d: { f: null, e: '5' }, a: 1 };
console.log(JSON.stringify(comparable(a)));
console.log(JSON.stringify(comparable(b)));
console.log(JSON.stringify(comparable(a)) == JSON.stringify(comparable(b)));
<div id="div"></div>
Comes in handy in tests (most test frameworks have an is function). E.g.
is(JSON.stringify(comparable(x)), JSON.stringify(comparable(y)), 'x must match y');
If a difference is caught, strings get logged, making differences spottable:
x must match y
got {"a":1,"b":{"0":2,"1":3},"c":7,"d":{"e":"5","f":null}},
expected {"a":1,"b":{"0":2,"1":3},"c":4,"d":{"e":"5","f":null}}.

Heres's a solution in ES6/ES2015 using a functional-style approach:
const typeOf = x =>
({}).toString
.call(x)
.match(/\[object (\w+)\]/)[1]
function areSimilar(a, b) {
const everyKey = f => Object.keys(a).every(f)
switch(typeOf(a)) {
case 'Array':
return a.length === b.length &&
everyKey(k => areSimilar(a.sort()[k], b.sort()[k]));
case 'Object':
return Object.keys(a).length === Object.keys(b).length &&
everyKey(k => areSimilar(a[k], b[k]));
default:
return a === b;
}
}
demo available here

I don't know if anyone's posted anything similar to this, but here's a function I made to check for object equalities.
function objectsAreEqual(a, b) {
for (var prop in a) {
if (a.hasOwnProperty(prop)) {
if (b.hasOwnProperty(prop)) {
if (typeof a[prop] === 'object') {
if (!objectsAreEqual(a[prop], b[prop])) return false;
} else {
if (a[prop] !== b[prop]) return false;
}
} else {
return false;
}
}
}
return true;
}
Also, it's recursive, so it can also check for deep equality, if that's what you call it.

ES6: The minimum code I could get it done, is this. It do deep comparison recursively by stringifying all key value array sorted representing the object, the only limitation is no methods or symbols are compare.
const compareObjects = (a, b) => {
let s = (o) => Object.entries(o).sort().map(i => {
if(i[1] instanceof Object) i[1] = s(i[1]);
return i
})
return JSON.stringify(s(a)) === JSON.stringify(s(b))
}
console.log(compareObjects({b:4,a:{b:1}}, {a:{b:1},b:4}));
IMPORTANT: This function is doing a JSON.stringfy in an ARRAY with the keys sorted and NOT in the object it self:
["a", ["b", 1]]
["b", 4]

Below is a short implementation which uses JSON.stringify but sorts the keys as #Jor suggested here.
Some tests were taken from the answer of #EbrahimByagowi here.
Of course, by using JSON.stringify, the solution is limited to JSON-serializable types (a string, a number, a JSON object, an array, a boolean, null). Objects like Date, Function, etc. are not supported.
function objectEquals(obj1, obj2) {
const JSONstringifyOrder = obj => {
const keys = {};
JSON.stringify(obj, (key, value) => {
keys[key] = null;
return value;
});
return JSON.stringify(obj, Object.keys(keys).sort());
};
return JSONstringifyOrder(obj1) === JSONstringifyOrder(obj2);
}
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
/// The borrowed tests, run them by clicking "Run code snippet"
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
var printResult = function (x) {
if (x) { document.write('<div style="color: green;">Passed</div>'); }
else { document.write('<div style="color: red;">Failed</div>'); }
};
var assert = { isTrue: function (x) { printResult(x); }, isFalse: function (x) { printResult(!x); } }
assert.isTrue(objectEquals("hi","hi"));
assert.isTrue(objectEquals(5,5));
assert.isFalse(objectEquals(5,10));
assert.isTrue(objectEquals([],[]));
assert.isTrue(objectEquals([1,2],[1,2]));
assert.isFalse(objectEquals([1,2],[2,1]));
assert.isFalse(objectEquals([1,2],[1,2,3]));
assert.isTrue(objectEquals({},{}));
assert.isTrue(objectEquals({a:1,b:2},{a:1,b:2}));
assert.isTrue(objectEquals({a:1,b:2},{b:2,a:1}));
assert.isFalse(objectEquals({a:1,b:2},{a:1,b:3}));
assert.isTrue(objectEquals({1:{name:"mhc",age:28}, 2:{name:"arb",age:26}},{1:{name:"mhc",age:28}, 2:{name:"arb",age:26}}));
assert.isFalse(objectEquals({1:{name:"mhc",age:28}, 2:{name:"arb",age:26}},{1:{name:"mhc",age:28}, 2:{name:"arb",age:27}}));

Just wanted to contribute my version of objects comparison utilizing some es6 features. It doesn't take an order into account. After converting all if/else's to ternary I've came with following:
function areEqual(obj1, obj2) {
return Object.keys(obj1).every(key => {
return obj2.hasOwnProperty(key) ?
typeof obj1[key] === 'object' ?
areEqual(obj1[key], obj2[key]) :
obj1[key] === obj2[key] :
false;
}
)
}

you can use _.isEqual(obj1, obj2) from the underscore.js library.
Here is an example:
var stooge = {name: 'moe', luckyNumbers: [13, 27, 34]};
var clone = {name: 'moe', luckyNumbers: [13, 27, 34]};
stooge == clone;
=> false
_.isEqual(stooge, clone);
=> true
See the official documentation from here: http://underscorejs.org/#isEqual

Assuming that the order of the properties in the object is not changed.
JSON.stringify() works for deep and non-deep both types of objects, not very sure of performance aspects:
var object1 = {
key: "value"
};
var object2 = {
key: "value"
};
var object3 = {
key: "no value"
};
console.log('object1 and object2 are equal: ', JSON.stringify(object1) === JSON.stringify(object2));
console.log('object2 and object3 are equal: ', JSON.stringify(object2) === JSON.stringify(object3));

let std1 = {
name: "Abhijeet",
roll: 1
}
let std2 = {
name: "Siddharth",
roll: 2
}
console.log(JSON.stringify(std1) === JSON.stringify(std2))

One easy way I have found to compare the values of two javascript objects while ignoring property order is with the JSON stringify replacer function:
const compareReplacer = (key, value) => {
if(typeof value === 'object' && !(value instanceof Array))
return Object.entries(value).sort();
return value;
}
export const compareObjects = (a, b) => JSON.stringify(a, compareReplacer) === JSON.stringify(b, compareReplacer);
This will order the properties at every step of the way so that the string result will be invariant to property order. Some one has probably done this before but I just thought I would share it incase not :).

EDIT: This method is quite flawed, and is rife with its own issues. I don't recommend it, and would appreciate some down-votes! It is problematic because 1) Some things can not be compared (i.e. functions) because they can not be serialized, 2) It isn't a very fast method of comparing, 3) It has ordering issues, 4) It can have collision issues/false positives if not properly implemented, 5) It can't check for "exactness" (===), and instead is based of value equality, which is oftentimes not what is desired in a comparison method.
A simple solution to this issue that many people don't realize is to sort the JSON strings (per character). This is also usually faster than the other solutions mentioned here:
function areEqual(obj1, obj2) {
var a = JSON.stringify(obj1), b = JSON.stringify(obj2);
if (!a) a = '';
if (!b) b = '';
return (a.split('').sort().join('') == b.split('').sort().join(''));
}
Another useful thing about this method is you can filter comparisons by passing a "replacer" function to the JSON.stringify functions (https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/JSON/stringify#Example_of_using_replacer_parameter). The following will only compare all objects keys that are named "derp":
function areEqual(obj1, obj2, filter) {
var a = JSON.stringify(obj1, filter), b = JSON.stringify(obj2, filter);
if (!a) a = '';
if (!b) b = '';
return (a.split('').sort().join('') == b.split('').sort().join(''));
}
var equal = areEqual(obj1, obj2, function(key, value) {
return (key === 'derp') ? value : undefined;
});

Needing a more generic object comparison function than had been posted, I cooked up the following. Critique appreciated...
Object.prototype.equals = function(iObj) {
if (this.constructor !== iObj.constructor)
return false;
var aMemberCount = 0;
for (var a in this) {
if (!this.hasOwnProperty(a))
continue;
if (typeof this[a] === 'object' && typeof iObj[a] === 'object' ? !this[a].equals(iObj[a]) : this[a] !== iObj[a])
return false;
++aMemberCount;
}
for (var a in iObj)
if (iObj.hasOwnProperty(a))
--aMemberCount;
return aMemberCount ? false : true;
}

If you are comparing JSON objects you can use https://github.com/mirek/node-rus-diff
npm install rus-diff
Usage:
a = {foo:{bar:1}}
b = {foo:{bar:1}}
c = {foo:{bar:2}}
var rusDiff = require('rus-diff').rusDiff
console.log(rusDiff(a, b)) // -> false, meaning a and b are equal
console.log(rusDiff(a, c)) // -> { '$set': { 'foo.bar': 2 } }
If two objects are different, a MongoDB compatible {$rename:{...}, $unset:{...}, $set:{...}} like object is returned.

I faced the same problem and deccided to write my own solution. But because I want to also compare Arrays with Objects and vice-versa, I crafted a generic solution. I decided to add the functions to the prototype, but one can easily rewrite them to standalone functions. Here is the code:
Array.prototype.equals = Object.prototype.equals = function(b) {
var ar = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(b));
var err = false;
for(var key in this) {
if(this.hasOwnProperty(key)) {
var found = ar.find(this[key]);
if(found > -1) {
if(Object.prototype.toString.call(ar) === "[object Object]") {
delete ar[Object.keys(ar)[found]];
}
else {
ar.splice(found, 1);
}
}
else {
err = true;
break;
}
}
};
if(Object.keys(ar).length > 0 || err) {
return false;
}
return true;
}
Array.prototype.find = Object.prototype.find = function(v) {
var f = -1;
for(var i in this) {
if(this.hasOwnProperty(i)) {
if(Object.prototype.toString.call(this[i]) === "[object Array]" || Object.prototype.toString.call(this[i]) === "[object Object]") {
if(this[i].equals(v)) {
f = (typeof(i) == "number") ? i : Object.keys(this).indexOf(i);
}
}
else if(this[i] === v) {
f = (typeof(i) == "number") ? i : Object.keys(this).indexOf(i);
}
}
}
return f;
}
This Algorithm is split into two parts; The equals function itself and a function to find the numeric index of a property in an array / object. The find function is only needed because indexof only finds numbers and strings and no objects .
One can call it like this:
({a: 1, b: "h"}).equals({a: 1, b: "h"});
The function either returns true or false, in this case true.
The algorithm als allows comparison between very complex objects:
({a: 1, b: "hello", c: ["w", "o", "r", "l", "d", {answer1: "should be", answer2: true}]}).equals({b: "hello", a: 1, c: ["w", "d", "o", "r", {answer1: "should be", answer2: true}, "l"]})
The upper example will return true, even tho the properties have a different ordering. One small detail to look out for: This code also checks for the same type of two variables, so "3" is not the same as 3.

stringify both objects and compare
return (JSON.stringify(obj1) === JSON.stringify(obj2))
This will return true or false

I'd advise against hashing or serialization (as the JSON solution suggest). If you need to test if two objects are equal, then you need to define what equals means. It could be that all data members in both objects match, or it could be that must the memory locations match (meaning both variables reference the same object in memory), or may be that only one data member in each object must match.
Recently I developed an object whose constructor creates a new id (starting from 1 and incrementing by 1) each time an instance is created. This object has an isEqual function that compares that id value with the id value of another object and returns true if they match.
In that case I defined "equal" as meaning the the id values match. Given that each instance has a unique id this could be used to enforce the idea that matching objects also occupy the same memory location. Although that is not necessary.

(Don't) split string and use as object property accessor [duplicate]

Given a JavaScript object,
var obj = { a: { b: '1', c: '2' } }
and a string
"a.b"
how can I convert the string to dot notation so I can go
var val = obj.a.b
If the string was just 'a', I could use obj[a]. But this is more complex. I imagine there is some straightforward method, but it escapes me at present.

recent note: While I'm flattered that this answer has gotten many upvotes, I am also somewhat horrified. If one needs to convert dot-notation strings like "x.a.b.c" into references, it could (maybe) be a sign that there is something very wrong going on (unless maybe you're performing some strange deserialization).
That is to say, novices who find their way to this answer must ask themselves the question "why am I doing this?"
It is of course generally fine to do this if your use case is small and you will not run into performance issues, AND you won't need to build upon your abstraction to make it more complicated later. In fact, if this will reduce code complexity and keep things simple, you should probably go ahead and do what OP is asking for. However, if that's not the case, consider if any of these apply:
case 1: As the primary method of working with your data (e.g. as your app's default form of passing objects around and dereferencing them). Like asking "how can I look up a function or variable name from a string".
This is bad programming practice (unnecessary metaprogramming specifically, and kind of violates function side-effect-free coding style, and will have performance hits). Novices who find themselves in this case, should instead consider working with array representations, e.g. ['x','a','b','c'], or even something more direct/simple/straightforward if possible: like not losing track of the references themselves in the first place (most ideal if it's only client-side or only server-side), etc. (A pre-existing unique id would be inelegant to add, but could be used if the spec otherwise requires its existence regardless.)
case 2: Working with serialized data, or data that will be displayed to the user. Like using a date as a string "1999-12-30" rather than a Date object (which can cause timezone bugs or added serialization complexity if not careful). Or you know what you're doing.
This is maybe fine. Be careful that there are no dot strings "." in your sanitized input fragments.
If you find yourself using this answer all the time and converting back and forth between string and array, you may be in the bad case, and should consider an alternative.
Here's an elegant one-liner that's 10x shorter than the other solutions:
function index(obj,i) {return obj[i]}
'a.b.etc'.split('.').reduce(index, obj)
[edit] Or in ECMAScript 6:
'a.b.etc'.split('.').reduce((o,i)=> o[i], obj)
(Not that I think eval always bad like others suggest it is (though it usually is), nevertheless those people will be pleased that this method doesn't use eval. The above will find obj.a.b.etc given obj and the string "a.b.etc".)
In response to those who still are afraid of using reduce despite it being in the ECMA-262 standard (5th edition), here is a two-line recursive implementation:
function multiIndex(obj,is) { // obj,['1','2','3'] -> ((obj['1'])['2'])['3']
return is.length ? multiIndex(obj[is[0]],is.slice(1)) : obj
}
function pathIndex(obj,is) { // obj,'1.2.3' -> multiIndex(obj,['1','2','3'])
return multiIndex(obj,is.split('.'))
}
pathIndex('a.b.etc')
Depending on the optimizations the JS compiler is doing, you may want to make sure any nested functions are not re-defined on every call via the usual methods (placing them in a closure, object, or global namespace).
edit:
To answer an interesting question in the comments:
how would you turn this into a setter as well? Not only returning the values by path, but also setting them if a new value is sent into the function? – Swader Jun 28 at 21:42
(sidenote: sadly can't return an object with a Setter, as that would violate the calling convention; commenter seems to instead be referring to a general setter-style function with side-effects like index(obj,"a.b.etc", value) doing obj.a.b.etc = value.)
The reduce style is not really suitable to that, but we can modify the recursive implementation:
function index(obj,is, value) {
if (typeof is == 'string')
return index(obj,is.split('.'), value);
else if (is.length==1 && value!==undefined)
return obj[is[0]] = value;
else if (is.length==0)
return obj;
else
return index(obj[is[0]],is.slice(1), value);
}
Demo:
> obj = {a:{b:{etc:5}}}
> index(obj,'a.b.etc')
5
> index(obj,['a','b','etc']) #works with both strings and lists
5
> index(obj,'a.b.etc', 123) #setter-mode - third argument (possibly poor form)
123
> index(obj,'a.b.etc')
123
...though personally I'd recommend making a separate function setIndex(...). I would like to end on a side-note that the original poser of the question could (should?) be working with arrays of indices (which they can get from .split), rather than strings; though there's usually nothing wrong with a convenience function.
A commenter asked:
what about arrays? something like "a.b[4].c.d[1][2][3]" ? –AlexS
Javascript is a very weird language; in general objects can only have strings as their property keys, so for example if x was a generic object like x={}, then x[1] would become x["1"]... you read that right... yup...
Javascript Arrays (which are themselves instances of Object) specifically encourage integer keys, even though you could do something like x=[]; x["puppy"]=5;.
But in general (and there are exceptions), x["somestring"]===x.somestring (when it's allowed; you can't do x.123).
(Keep in mind that whatever JS compiler you're using might choose, maybe, to compile these down to saner representations if it can prove it would not violate the spec.)
So the answer to your question would depend on whether you're assuming those objects only accept integers (due to a restriction in your problem domain), or not. Let's assume not. Then a valid expression is a concatenation of a base identifier plus some .identifiers plus some ["stringindex"]s.
Let us ignore for a moment that we can of course do other things legitimately in the grammar like identifier[0xFA7C25DD].asdf[f(4)?.[5]+k][false][null][undefined][NaN]; integers are not (that) 'special'.
Commenter's statement would then be equivalent to a["b"][4]["c"]["d"][1][2][3], though we should probably also support a.b["c\"validjsstringliteral"][3]. You'd have to check the ecmascript grammar section on string literals to see how to parse a valid string literal. Technically you'd also want to check (unlike in my first answer) that a is a valid javascript identifier.
A simple answer to your question though, if your strings don't contain commas or brackets, would be just be to match length 1+ sequences of characters not in the set , or [ or ]:
> "abc[4].c.def[1][2][\"gh\"]".match(/[^\]\[.]+/g)
// ^^^ ^ ^ ^^^ ^ ^ ^^^^^
["abc", "4", "c", "def", "1", "2", ""gh""]
If your strings don't contain escape characters or " characters, and because IdentifierNames are a sublanguage of StringLiterals (I think???) you could first convert your dots to []:
> var R=[], demoString="abc[4].c.def[1][2][\"gh\"]";
> for(var match,matcher=/^([^\.\[]+)|\.([^\.\[]+)|\["([^"]+)"\]|\[(\d+)\]/g;
match=matcher.exec(demoString); ) {
R.push(Array.from(match).slice(1).filter(x=> x!==undefined)[0]);
// extremely bad code because js regexes are weird, don't use this
}
> R
["abc", "4", "c", "def", "1", "2", "gh"]
Of course, always be careful and never trust your data. Some bad ways to do this that might work for some use cases also include:
// hackish/wrongish; preprocess your string into "a.b.4.c.d.1.2.3", e.g.:
> yourstring.replace(/]/g,"").replace(/\[/g,".").split(".")
"a.b.4.c.d.1.2.3" //use code from before
Special 2018 edit:
Let's go full-circle and do the most inefficient, horribly-overmetaprogrammed solution we can come up with... in the interest of syntactical purityhamfistery. With ES6 Proxy objects!... Let's also define some properties which (imho are fine and wonderful but) may break improperly-written libraries. You should perhaps be wary of using this if you care about performance, sanity (yours or others'), your job, etc.
// [1,2,3][-1]==3 (or just use .slice(-1)[0])
if (![1][-1])
Object.defineProperty(Array.prototype, -1, {get() {return this[this.length-1]}}); //credit to caub
// WARNING: THIS XTREME™ RADICAL METHOD IS VERY INEFFICIENT,
// ESPECIALLY IF INDEXING INTO MULTIPLE OBJECTS,
// because you are constantly creating wrapper objects on-the-fly and,
// even worse, going through Proxy i.e. runtime ~reflection, which prevents
// compiler optimization
// Proxy handler to override obj[*]/obj.* and obj[*]=...
var hyperIndexProxyHandler = {
get: function(obj,key, proxy) {
return key.split('.').reduce((o,i)=> o[i], obj);
},
set: function(obj,key,value, proxy) {
var keys = key.split('.');
var beforeLast = keys.slice(0,-1).reduce((o,i)=> o[i], obj);
beforeLast[keys[-1]] = value;
},
has: function(obj,key) {
//etc
}
};
function hyperIndexOf(target) {
return new Proxy(target, hyperIndexProxyHandler);
}
Demo:
var obj = {a:{b:{c:1, d:2}}};
console.log("obj is:", JSON.stringify(obj));
var objHyper = hyperIndexOf(obj);
console.log("(proxy override get) objHyper['a.b.c'] is:", objHyper['a.b.c']);
objHyper['a.b.c'] = 3;
console.log("(proxy override set) objHyper['a.b.c']=3, now obj is:", JSON.stringify(obj));
console.log("(behind the scenes) objHyper is:", objHyper);
if (!({}).H)
Object.defineProperties(Object.prototype, {
H: {
get: function() {
return hyperIndexOf(this); // TODO:cache as a non-enumerable property for efficiency?
}
}
});
console.log("(shortcut) obj.H['a.b.c']=4");
obj.H['a.b.c'] = 4;
console.log("(shortcut) obj.H['a.b.c'] is obj['a']['b']['c'] is", obj.H['a.b.c']);
Output:
obj is: {"a":{"b":{"c":1,"d":2}}}
(proxy override get) objHyper['a.b.c'] is: 1
(proxy override set) objHyper['a.b.c']=3, now obj is: {"a":{"b":{"c":3,"d":2}}}
(behind the scenes) objHyper is: Proxy {a: {…}}
(shortcut) obj.H['a.b.c']=4
(shortcut) obj.H['a.b.c'] is obj['a']['b']['c'] is: 4
inefficient idea: You can modify the above to dispatch based on the input argument; either use the .match(/[^\]\[.]+/g) method to support obj['keys'].like[3]['this'], or if instanceof Array, then just accept an Array as input like keys = ['a','b','c']; obj.H[keys].
Per suggestion that maybe you want to handle undefined indices in a 'softer' NaN-style manner (e.g. index({a:{b:{c:...}}}, 'a.x.c') return undefined rather than uncaught TypeError)...:
This makes sense from the perspective of "we should return undefined rather than throw an error" in the 1-dimensional index situation ({})['e.g.']==undefined, so "we should return undefined rather than throw an error" in the N-dimensional situation.
This does not make sense from the perspective that we are doing x['a']['x']['c'], which would fail with a TypeError in the above example.
That said, you'd make this work by replacing your reducing function with either:
(o,i)=> o===undefined?undefined:o[i], or
(o,i)=> (o||{})[i].
(You can make this more efficient by using a for loop and breaking/returning whenever the subresult you'd next index into is undefined, or using a try-catch if you expect such failures to be sufficiently rare.)

If you can use Lodash, there is a function, which does exactly that:
_.get(object, path, [defaultValue])
var val = _.get(obj, "a.b");

You could use lodash.get
After installing (npm i lodash.get), use it like this:
const get = require('lodash.get');
const myObj = {
user: {
firstName: 'Stacky',
lastName: 'Overflowy',
list: ['zero', 'one', 'two']
},
id: 123
};
console.log(get(myObj, 'user.firstName')); // outputs Stacky
console.log(get(myObj, 'id')); // outputs 123
console.log(get(myObj, 'user.list[1]')); // outputs one
// You can also update values
get(myObj, 'user').firstName = 'John';

A little more involved example with recursion.
function recompose(obj, string) {
var parts = string.split('.');
var newObj = obj[parts[0]];
if (parts[1]) {
parts.splice(0, 1);
var newString = parts.join('.');
return recompose(newObj, newString);
}
return newObj;
}
var obj = { a: { b: '1', c: '2', d:{a:{b:'blah'}}}};
console.log(recompose(obj, 'a.d.a.b')); //blah

2021
You don't need to pull in another dependency every time you wish for new capabilities in your program. Modern JS is very capable and the optional-chaining operator ?. is now widely supported and makes this kind of task easy as heck.
With a single line of code we can write get that takes an input object, t and string path. It works for object and arrays of any nesting level -
const get = (t, path) =>
path.split(".").reduce((r, k) => r?.[k], t)
const mydata =
{ a: { b: [ 0, { c: { d: [ "hello", "world" ] } } ] } }
console.log(get(mydata, "a.b.1.c.d.0"))
console.log(get(mydata, "a.b.1.c.d.1"))
console.log(get(mydata, "a.b.x.y.z"))
"hello"
"world"
undefined

I suggest to split the path and iterate it and reduce the object you have. This proposal works with a default value for missing properties.
const getValue = (object, keys) => keys.split('.').reduce((o, k) => (o || {})[k], object);
console.log(getValue({ a: { b: '1', c: '2' } }, 'a.b'));
console.log(getValue({ a: { b: '1', c: '2' } }, 'foo.bar.baz'));

Many years since the original post.
Now there is a great library called 'object-path'.
https://github.com/mariocasciaro/object-path
Available on NPM and BOWER
https://www.npmjs.com/package/object-path
It's as easy as:
objectPath.get(obj, "a.c.1"); //returns "f"
objectPath.set(obj, "a.j.0.f", "m");
And works for deeply nested properties and arrays.

If you expect to dereference the same path many times, building a function for each dot notation path actually has the best performance by far (expanding on the perf tests James Wilkins linked to in comments above).
var path = 'a.b.x';
var getter = new Function("obj", "return obj." + path + ";");
getter(obj);
Using the Function constructor has some of the same drawbacks as eval() in terms of security and worst-case performance, but IMO it's a badly underused tool for cases where you need a combination of extreme dynamism and high performance. I use this methodology to build array filter functions and call them inside an AngularJS digest loop. My profiles consistently show the array.filter() step taking less than 1ms to dereference and filter about 2000 complex objects, using dynamically-defined paths 3-4 levels deep.
A similar methodology could be used to create setter functions, of course:
var setter = new Function("obj", "newval", "obj." + path + " = newval;");
setter(obj, "some new val");

Other proposals are a little cryptic, so I thought I'd contribute:
Object.prop = function(obj, prop, val){
var props = prop.split('.')
, final = props.pop(), p
while(p = props.shift()){
if (typeof obj[p] === 'undefined')
return undefined;
obj = obj[p]
}
return val ? (obj[final] = val) : obj[final]
}
var obj = { a: { b: '1', c: '2' } }
// get
console.log(Object.prop(obj, 'a.c')) // -> 2
// set
Object.prop(obj, 'a.c', function(){})
console.log(obj) // -> { a: { b: '1', c: [Function] } }

var a = { b: { c: 9 } };
function value(layer, path, value) {
var i = 0,
path = path.split('.');
for (; i < path.length; i++)
if (value != null && i + 1 === path.length)
layer[path[i]] = value;
layer = layer[path[i]];
return layer;
};
value(a, 'b.c'); // 9
value(a, 'b.c', 4);
value(a, 'b.c'); // 4
This is a lot of code when compared to the much simpler eval way of doing it, but like Simon Willison says, you should never use eval.
Also, JSFiddle.

You can use the library available at npm, which simplifies this process. https://www.npmjs.com/package/dot-object
var dot = require('dot-object');
var obj = {
some: {
nested: {
value: 'Hi there!'
}
}
};
var val = dot.pick('some.nested.value', obj);
console.log(val);
// Result: Hi there!

Note if you're already using Lodash you can use the property or get functions:
var obj = { a: { b: '1', c: '2' } };
_.property('a.b')(obj); // => 1
_.get(obj, 'a.b'); // => 1
Underscore.js also has a property function, but it doesn't support dot notation.

I have extended the elegant answer by ninjagecko so that the function handles both dotted and/or array style references, and so that an empty string causes the parent object to be returned.
Here you go:
string_to_ref = function (object, reference) {
function arr_deref(o, ref, i) { return !ref ? o : (o[ref.slice(0, i ? -1 : ref.length)]) }
function dot_deref(o, ref) { return ref.split('[').reduce(arr_deref, o); }
return !reference ? object : reference.split('.').reduce(dot_deref, object);
};
See my working jsFiddle example here: http://jsfiddle.net/sc0ttyd/q7zyd/

You can obtain value of an object member by dot notation with a single line of code:
new Function('_', 'return _.' + path)(obj);
In you case:
var obj = { a: { b: '1', c: '2' } }
var val = new Function('_', 'return _.a.b')(obj);
To make it simple you may write a function like this:
function objGet(obj, path){
return new Function('_', 'return _.' + path)(obj);
}
Explanation:
The Function constructor creates a new Function object. In JavaScript every function is actually a Function object. Syntax to create a function explicitly with Function constructor is:
new Function ([arg1[, arg2[, ...argN]],] functionBody)
where arguments(arg1 to argN) must be a string that corresponds to a valid javaScript identifier and functionBody is a string containing the javaScript statements comprising the function definition.
In our case we take the advantage of string function body to retrieve object member with dot notation.
Hope it helps.

var find = function(root, path) {
var segments = path.split('.'),
cursor = root,
target;
for (var i = 0; i < segments.length; ++i) {
target = cursor[segments[i]];
if (typeof target == "undefined") return void 0;
cursor = target;
}
return cursor;
};
var obj = { a: { b: '1', c: '2' } }
find(obj, "a.b"); // 1
var set = function (root, path, value) {
var segments = path.split('.'),
cursor = root,
target;
for (var i = 0; i < segments.length - 1; ++i) {
cursor = cursor[segments[i]] || { };
}
cursor[segments[segments.length - 1]] = value;
};
set(obj, "a.k", function () { console.log("hello world"); });
find(obj, "a.k")(); // hello world

Use this function:
function dotToObject(data) {
function index(parent, key, value) {
const [mainKey, ...children] = key.split(".");
parent[mainKey] = parent[mainKey] || {};
if (children.length === 1) {
parent[mainKey][children[0]] = value;
} else {
index(parent[mainKey], children.join("."), value);
}
}
const result = Object.entries(data).reduce((acc, [key, value]) => {
if (key.includes(".")) {
index(acc, key, value);
} else {
acc[key] = value;
}
return acc;
}, {});
return result;
}
module.exports = { dotToObject };
Ex:
const user = {
id: 1,
name: 'My name',
'address.zipCode': '123',
'address.name': 'Some name',
'address.something.id': 1,
}
const mappedUser = dotToObject(user)
console.log(JSON.stringify(mappedUser, null, 2))
Output:
{
"id": 1,
"name": "My name",
"address": {
"zipCode": "123",
"name": "Some name",
"something": {
"id": 1
}
}
}

using Array Reduce function will get/set based on path provided.
I tested it with a.b.c and a.b.2.c {a:{b:[0,1,{c:7}]}} and its works for both getting key or mutating object to set value
function setOrGet(obj, path=[], newValue){
const l = typeof path === 'string' ? path.split('.') : path;
return l.reduce((carry,item, idx)=>{
const leaf = carry[item];
// is this last item in path ? cool lets set/get value
if( l.length-idx===1) {
// mutate object if newValue is set;
carry[item] = newValue===undefined ? leaf : newValue;
// return value if its a get/object if it was a set
return newValue===undefined ? leaf : obj ;
}
carry[item] = leaf || {}; // mutate if key not an object;
return carry[item]; // return object ref: to continue reduction;
}, obj)
}
console.log(
setOrGet({a: {b:1}},'a.b') === 1 ||
'Test Case: Direct read failed'
)
console.log(
setOrGet({a: {b:1}},'a.c',22).a.c===22 ||
'Test Case: Direct set failed'
)
console.log(
setOrGet({a: {b:[1,2]}},'a.b.1',22).a.b[1]===22 ||
'Test Case: Direct set on array failed'
)
console.log(
setOrGet({a: {b:{c: {e:1} }}},'a.b.c.e',22).a.b.c. e===22 ||
'Test Case: deep get failed'
)
// failed !. Thats your homework :)
console.log(
setOrGet({a: {b:{c: {e:[1,2,3,4,5]} }}},'a.b.c.e.3 ',22)
)
my personal recommendation.
do not use such a thing unless there is no other way!
i saw many examples people use it for translations for example from json; so you see function like locale('app.homepage.welcome') . this is just bad. if you already have data in an object/json; and you know path.. then just use it directly example locale().app.homepage.welcome by changing you function to return object you get typesafe, with autocomplete, less prone to typo's ..

I copied the following from Ricardo Tomasi's answer and modified to also create sub-objects that don't yet exist as necessary. It's a little less efficient (more ifs and creating of empty objects), but should be pretty good.
Also, it'll allow us to do Object.prop(obj, 'a.b', false) where we couldn't before. Unfortunately, it still won't let us assign undefined...Not sure how to go about that one yet.
/**
* Object.prop()
*
* Allows dot-notation access to object properties for both getting and setting.
*
* #param {Object} obj The object we're getting from or setting
* #param {string} prop The dot-notated string defining the property location
* #param {mixed} val For setting only; the value to set
*/
Object.prop = function(obj, prop, val){
var props = prop.split('.'),
final = props.pop(),
p;
for (var i = 0; i < props.length; i++) {
p = props[i];
if (typeof obj[p] === 'undefined') {
// If we're setting
if (typeof val !== 'undefined') {
// If we're not at the end of the props, keep adding new empty objects
if (i != props.length)
obj[p] = {};
}
else
return undefined;
}
obj = obj[p]
}
return typeof val !== "undefined" ? (obj[final] = val) : obj[final]
}

Few years later, I found this that handles scope and array. e.g. a['b']["c"].d.etc
function getScopedObj(scope, str) {
let obj=scope, arr;
try {
arr = str.split(/[\[\]\.]/) // split by [,],.
.filter(el => el) // filter out empty one
.map(el => el.replace(/^['"]+|['"]+$/g, '')); // remove string quotation
arr.forEach(el => obj = obj[el])
} catch(e) {
obj = undefined;
}
return obj;
}
window.a = {b: {c: {d: {etc: 'success'}}}}
getScopedObj(window, `a.b.c.d.etc`) // success
getScopedObj(window, `a['b']["c"].d.etc`) // success
getScopedObj(window, `a['INVALID']["c"].d.etc`) // undefined

If you wish to convert any object that contains dot notation keys into an arrayed version of those keys you can use this.
This will convert something like
{
name: 'Andy',
brothers.0: 'Bob'
brothers.1: 'Steve'
brothers.2: 'Jack'
sisters.0: 'Sally'
}
to
{
name: 'Andy',
brothers: ['Bob', 'Steve', 'Jack']
sisters: ['Sally']
}
convertDotNotationToArray(objectWithDotNotation) {
Object.entries(objectWithDotNotation).forEach(([key, val]) => {
// Is the key of dot notation
if (key.includes('.')) {
const [name, index] = key.split('.');
// If you have not created an array version, create one
if (!objectWithDotNotation[name]) {
objectWithDotNotation[name] = new Array();
}
// Save the value in the newly created array at the specific index
objectWithDotNotation[name][index] = val;
// Delete the current dot notation key val
delete objectWithDotNotation[key];
}
});
}

If you want to convert a string dot notation into an object, I've made a handy little helper than can turn a string like a.b.c.d with a value of e with dotPathToObject("a.b.c.d", "value") returning this:
{
"a": {
"b": {
"c": {
"d": "value"
}
}
}
}
https://gist.github.com/ahallora/9731d73efb15bd3d3db647efa3389c12

Solution:
function deepFind(key, data){
return key.split('.').reduce((ob,i)=> ob?.[i], data)
}
Usage:
const obj = {
company: "Pet Shop",
person: {
name: "John"
},
animal: {
name: "Lucky"
}
}
const company = deepFind("company", obj)
const personName = deepFind("person.name", obj)
const animalName = deepFind("animal.name", obj)

Here is my implementation
Implementation 1
Object.prototype.access = function() {
var ele = this[arguments[0]];
if(arguments.length === 1) return ele;
return ele.access.apply(ele, [].slice.call(arguments, 1));
}
Implementation 2 (using array reduce instead of slice)
Object.prototype.access = function() {
var self = this;
return [].reduce.call(arguments,function(prev,cur) {
return prev[cur];
}, self);
}
Examples:
var myobj = {'a':{'b':{'c':{'d':'abcd','e':[11,22,33]}}}};
myobj.access('a','b','c'); // returns: {'d':'abcd', e:[0,1,2,3]}
myobj.a.b.access('c','d'); // returns: 'abcd'
myobj.access('a','b','c','e',0); // returns: 11
it can also handle objects inside arrays as for
var myobj2 = {'a': {'b':[{'c':'ab0c'},{'d':'ab1d'}]}}
myobj2.access('a','b','1','d'); // returns: 'ab1d'

I used this code in my project
const getValue = (obj, arrPath) => (
arrPath.reduce((x, y) => {
if (y in x) return x[y]
return {}
}, obj)
)
Usage:
const obj = { id: { user: { local: 104 } } }
const path = [ 'id', 'user', 'local' ]
getValue(obj, path) // return 104

Using object-scan seems a bit overkill, but you can simply do
// const objectScan = require('object-scan');
const get = (obj, p) => objectScan([p], { abort: true, rtn: 'value' })(obj);
const obj = { a: { b: '1', c: '2' } };
console.log(get(obj, 'a.b'));
// => 1
console.log(get(obj, '*.c'));
// => 2
.as-console-wrapper {max-height: 100% !important; top: 0}
<script src="https://bundle.run/object-scan#13.7.1"></script>
Disclaimer: I'm the author of object-scan
There are a lot more advanced examples in the readme.

This is one of those cases, where you ask 10 developers and you get 10 answers.
Below is my [simplified] solution for OP, using dynamic programming.
The idea is that you would pass an existing DTO object that you wish to UPDATE. This makes the method most useful in the case where you have a form with several input elements having name attributes set with dot (fluent) syntax.
Example use:
<input type="text" name="person.contact.firstName" />
Code snippet:
const setFluently = (obj, path, value) => {
if (typeof path === "string") {
return setFluently(obj, path.split("."), value);
}
if (path.length <= 1) {
obj[path[0]] = value;
return obj;
}
const key = path[0];
obj[key] = setFluently(obj[key] ? obj[key] : {}, path.slice(1), value);
return obj;
};
const origObj = {
a: {
b: "1",
c: "2"
}
};
setFluently(origObj, "a.b", "3");
setFluently(origObj, "a.c", "4");
console.log(JSON.stringify(origObj, null, 3));

function at(obj, path, val = undefined) {
// If path is an Array,
if (Array.isArray(path)) {
// it returns the mapped array for each result of the path
return path.map((path) => at(obj, path, val));
}
// Uniting several RegExps into one
const rx = new RegExp(
[
/(?:^(?:\.\s*)?([_a-zA-Z][_a-zA-Z0-9]*))/,
/(?:^\[\s*(\d+)\s*\])/,
/(?:^\[\s*'([^']*(?:\\'[^']*)*)'\s*\])/,
/(?:^\[\s*"([^"]*(?:\\"[^"]*)*)"\s*\])/,
/(?:^\[\s*`([^`]*(?:\\`[^`]*)*)`\s*\])/,
]
.map((r) => r.source)
.join("|")
);
let rm;
while (rm = rx.exec(path.trim())) {
// Matched resource
let [rf, rp] = rm.filter(Boolean);
// If no one matches found,
if (!rm[1] && !rm[2]) {
// it will replace escape-chars
rp = rp.replace(/\\(.)/g, "$1");
}
// If the new value is set,
if ("undefined" != typeof val && path.length == rf.length) {
// assign a value to the object property and return it
return (obj[rp] = val);
}
// Going one step deeper
obj = obj[rp];
// Removing a step from the path
path = path.substr(rf.length).trim();
}
if (path) {
throw new SyntaxError();
}
return obj;
}
// Test object schema
let o = { a: { b: [ [ { c: { d: { '"e"': { f: { g: "xxx" } } } } } ] ] } };
// Print source object
console.log(JSON.stringify(o));
// Set value
console.log(at(o, '.a["b"][0][0].c[`d`]["\\"e\\""][\'f\']["g"]', "zzz"));
// Get value
console.log(at(o, '.a["b"][0][0].c[`d`]["\\"e\\""][\'f\']["g"]'));
// Print result object
console.log(JSON.stringify(o));

Here is my code without using eval. It’s easy to understand too.
function value(obj, props) {
if (!props)
return obj;
var propsArr = props.split('.');
var prop = propsArr.splice(0, 1);
return value(obj[prop], propsArr.join('.'));
}
var obj = { a: { b: '1', c: '2', d:{a:{b:'blah'}}}};
console.log(value(obj, 'a.d.a.b')); // Returns blah

Yes, extending base prototypes is not usually good idea but, if you keep all extensions in one place, they might be useful.
So, here is my way to do this.
Object.defineProperty(Object.prototype, "getNestedProperty", {
value : function (propertyName) {
var result = this;
var arr = propertyName.split(".");
while (arr.length && result) {
result = result[arr.shift()];
}
return result;
},
enumerable: false
});
Now you will be able to get nested property everywhere without importing module with function or copy/pasting function.
Example:
{a:{b:11}}.getNestedProperty('a.b'); // Returns 11
The Next.js extension broke Mongoose in my project. Also I've read that it might break jQuery. So, never do it in the Next.js way:
Object.prototype.getNestedProperty = function (propertyName) {
var result = this;
var arr = propertyName.split(".");
while (arr.length && result) {
result = result[arr.shift()];
}
return result;
};

This is my extended solution proposed by ninjagecko.
For me, simple string notation was not enough, so the below version supports things like:
index(obj, 'data.accounts[0].address[0].postcode');
 
/**
* Get object by index
* #supported
* - arrays supported
* - array indexes supported
* #not-supported
* - multiple arrays
* #issues:
* index(myAccount, 'accounts[0].address[0].id') - works fine
* index(myAccount, 'accounts[].address[0].id') - doesnt work
* #Example:
* index(obj, 'data.accounts[].id') => returns array of id's
* index(obj, 'data.accounts[0].id') => returns id of 0 element from array
* index(obj, 'data.accounts[0].addresses.list[0].id') => error
* #param obj
* #param path
* #returns {any}
*/
var index = function(obj, path, isArray?, arrIndex?){
// is an array
if(typeof isArray === 'undefined') isArray = false;
// array index,
// if null, will take all indexes
if(typeof arrIndex === 'undefined') arrIndex = null;
var _arrIndex = null;
var reduceArrayTag = function(i, subArrIndex){
return i.replace(/(\[)([\d]{0,})(\])/, (i) => {
var tmp = i.match(/(\[)([\d]{0,})(\])/);
isArray = true;
if(subArrIndex){
_arrIndex = (tmp[2] !== '') ? tmp[2] : null;
}else{
arrIndex = (tmp[2] !== '') ? tmp[2] : null;
}
return '';
});
}
function byIndex(obj, i) {
// if is an array
if(isArray){
isArray = false;
i = reduceArrayTag(i, true);
// if array index is null,
// return an array of with values from every index
if(!arrIndex){
var arrValues = [];
_.forEach(obj, (el) => {
arrValues.push(index(el, i, isArray, arrIndex));
})
return arrValues;
}
// if array index is specified
var value = obj[arrIndex][i];
if(isArray){
arrIndex = _arrIndex;
}else{
arrIndex = null;
}
return value;
}else{
// remove [] from notation,
// if [] has been removed, check the index of array
i = reduceArrayTag(i, false);
return obj[i]
}
}
// reduce with the byIndex method
return path.split('.').reduce(byIndex, obj)
}

How to compare two javascript objects from one specific property [duplicate]

A strict equality operator will tell you if two object types are equal. However, is there a way to tell if two objects are equal, much like the hash code value in Java?
Stack Overflow question Is there any kind of hashCode function in JavaScript? is similar to this question, but requires a more academic answer. The scenario above demonstrates why it would be necessary to have one, and I'm wondering if there is any equivalent solution.

Why reinvent the wheel? Give Lodash a try. It has a number of must-have functions such as isEqual().
_.isEqual(object, other);
It will brute force check each key value - just like the other examples on this page - using ECMAScript 5 and native optimizations if they're available in the browser.
Note: Previously this answer recommended Underscore.js, but lodash has done a better job of getting bugs fixed and addressing issues with consistency.

The short answer
The simple answer is: No, there is no generic means to determine that an object is equal to another in the sense you mean. The exception is when you are strictly thinking of an object being typeless.
The long answer
The concept is that of an Equals method that compares two different instances of an object to indicate whether they are equal at a value level. However, it is up to the specific type to define how an Equals method should be implemented. An iterative comparison of attributes that have primitive values may not be enough: an object may contain attributes which are not relevant to equality. For example,
function MyClass(a, b)
{
var c;
this.getCLazy = function() {
if (c === undefined) c = a * b // imagine * is really expensive
return c;
}
}
In this above case, c is not really important to determine whether any two instances of MyClass are equal, only a and b are important. In some cases c might vary between instances and yet not be significant during comparison.
Note this issue applies when members may themselves also be instances of a type and these each would all be required to have a means of determining equality.
Further complicating things is that in JavaScript the distinction between data and method is blurred.
An object may reference a method that is to be called as an event handler, and this would likely not be considered part of its 'value state'. Whereas another object may well be assigned a function that performs an important calculation and thereby makes this instance different from others simply because it references a different function.
What about an object that has one of its existing prototype methods overridden by another function? Could it still be considered equal to another instance that it otherwise identical? That question can only be answered in each specific case for each type.
As stated earlier, the exception would be a strictly typeless object. In which case the only sensible choice is an iterative and recursive comparison of each member. Even then one has to ask what is the 'value' of a function?

The default equality operator in JavaScript for Objects yields true when they refer to the same location in memory.
var x = {};
var y = {};
var z = x;
x === y; // => false
x === z; // => true
If you require a different equality operator you'll need to add an equals(other) method, or something like it to your classes and the specifics of your problem domain will determine what exactly that means.
Here's a playing card example:
function Card(rank, suit) {
this.rank = rank;
this.suit = suit;
this.equals = function(other) {
return other.rank == this.rank && other.suit == this.suit;
};
}
var queenOfClubs = new Card(12, "C");
var kingOfSpades = new Card(13, "S");
queenOfClubs.equals(kingOfSpades); // => false
kingOfSpades.equals(new Card(13, "S")); // => true

Short functional deepEqual implementation:
function deepEqual(x, y) {
return (x && y && typeof x === 'object' && typeof y === 'object') ?
(Object.keys(x).length === Object.keys(y).length) &&
Object.keys(x).reduce(function(isEqual, key) {
return isEqual && deepEqual(x[key], y[key]);
}, true) : (x === y);
}
Edit: version 2, using jib's suggestion and ES6 arrow functions:
function deepEqual(x, y) {
const ok = Object.keys, tx = typeof x, ty = typeof y;
return x && y && tx === 'object' && tx === ty ? (
ok(x).length === ok(y).length &&
ok(x).every(key => deepEqual(x[key], y[key]))
) : (x === y);
}

This is my version. It is using new Object.keys feature that is introduced in ES5 and ideas/tests from +, + and +:
function objectEquals(x, y) {
'use strict';
if (x === null || x === undefined || y === null || y === undefined) { return x === y; }
// after this just checking type of one would be enough
if (x.constructor !== y.constructor) { return false; }
// if they are functions, they should exactly refer to same one (because of closures)
if (x instanceof Function) { return x === y; }
// if they are regexps, they should exactly refer to same one (it is hard to better equality check on current ES)
if (x instanceof RegExp) { return x === y; }
if (x === y || x.valueOf() === y.valueOf()) { return true; }
if (Array.isArray(x) && x.length !== y.length) { return false; }
// if they are dates, they must had equal valueOf
if (x instanceof Date) { return false; }
// if they are strictly equal, they both need to be object at least
if (!(x instanceof Object)) { return false; }
if (!(y instanceof Object)) { return false; }
// recursive object equality check
var p = Object.keys(x);
return Object.keys(y).every(function (i) { return p.indexOf(i) !== -1; }) &&
p.every(function (i) { return objectEquals(x[i], y[i]); });
}
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
/// The borrowed tests, run them by clicking "Run code snippet"
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
var printResult = function (x) {
if (x) { document.write('<div style="color: green;">Passed</div>'); }
else { document.write('<div style="color: red;">Failed</div>'); }
};
var assert = { isTrue: function (x) { printResult(x); }, isFalse: function (x) { printResult(!x); } }
assert.isTrue(objectEquals(null,null));
assert.isFalse(objectEquals(null,undefined));
assert.isFalse(objectEquals(/abc/, /abc/));
assert.isFalse(objectEquals(/abc/, /123/));
var r = /abc/;
assert.isTrue(objectEquals(r, r));
assert.isTrue(objectEquals("hi","hi"));
assert.isTrue(objectEquals(5,5));
assert.isFalse(objectEquals(5,10));
assert.isTrue(objectEquals([],[]));
assert.isTrue(objectEquals([1,2],[1,2]));
assert.isFalse(objectEquals([1,2],[2,1]));
assert.isFalse(objectEquals([1,2],[1,2,3]));
assert.isTrue(objectEquals({},{}));
assert.isTrue(objectEquals({a:1,b:2},{a:1,b:2}));
assert.isTrue(objectEquals({a:1,b:2},{b:2,a:1}));
assert.isFalse(objectEquals({a:1,b:2},{a:1,b:3}));
assert.isTrue(objectEquals({1:{name:"mhc",age:28}, 2:{name:"arb",age:26}},{1:{name:"mhc",age:28}, 2:{name:"arb",age:26}}));
assert.isFalse(objectEquals({1:{name:"mhc",age:28}, 2:{name:"arb",age:26}},{1:{name:"mhc",age:28}, 2:{name:"arb",age:27}}));
Object.prototype.equals = function (obj) { return objectEquals(this, obj); };
var assertFalse = assert.isFalse,
assertTrue = assert.isTrue;
assertFalse({}.equals(null));
assertFalse({}.equals(undefined));
assertTrue("hi".equals("hi"));
assertTrue(new Number(5).equals(5));
assertFalse(new Number(5).equals(10));
assertFalse(new Number(1).equals("1"));
assertTrue([].equals([]));
assertTrue([1,2].equals([1,2]));
assertFalse([1,2].equals([2,1]));
assertFalse([1,2].equals([1,2,3]));
assertTrue(new Date("2011-03-31").equals(new Date("2011-03-31")));
assertFalse(new Date("2011-03-31").equals(new Date("1970-01-01")));
assertTrue({}.equals({}));
assertTrue({a:1,b:2}.equals({a:1,b:2}));
assertTrue({a:1,b:2}.equals({b:2,a:1}));
assertFalse({a:1,b:2}.equals({a:1,b:3}));
assertTrue({1:{name:"mhc",age:28}, 2:{name:"arb",age:26}}.equals({1:{name:"mhc",age:28}, 2:{name:"arb",age:26}}));
assertFalse({1:{name:"mhc",age:28}, 2:{name:"arb",age:26}}.equals({1:{name:"mhc",age:28}, 2:{name:"arb",age:27}}));
var a = {a: 'text', b:[0,1]};
var b = {a: 'text', b:[0,1]};
var c = {a: 'text', b: 0};
var d = {a: 'text', b: false};
var e = {a: 'text', b:[1,0]};
var i = {
a: 'text',
c: {
b: [1, 0]
}
};
var j = {
a: 'text',
c: {
b: [1, 0]
}
};
var k = {a: 'text', b: null};
var l = {a: 'text', b: undefined};
assertTrue(a.equals(b));
assertFalse(a.equals(c));
assertFalse(c.equals(d));
assertFalse(a.equals(e));
assertTrue(i.equals(j));
assertFalse(d.equals(k));
assertFalse(k.equals(l));
// from comments on stackoverflow post
assert.isFalse(objectEquals([1, 2, undefined], [1, 2]));
assert.isFalse(objectEquals([1, 2, 3], { 0: 1, 1: 2, 2: 3 }));
assert.isFalse(objectEquals(new Date(1234), 1234));
// no two different function is equal really, they capture their context variables
// so even if they have same toString(), they won't have same functionality
var func = function (x) { return true; };
var func2 = function (x) { return true; };
assert.isTrue(objectEquals(func, func));
assert.isFalse(objectEquals(func, func2));
assert.isTrue(objectEquals({ a: { b: func } }, { a: { b: func } }));
assert.isFalse(objectEquals({ a: { b: func } }, { a: { b: func2 } }));

If you are working in AngularJS, the angular.equals function will determine if two objects are equal. In Ember.js use isEqual.
angular.equals - See the docs or source for more on this method. It does a deep compare on arrays too.
Ember.js isEqual - See the docs or source for more on this method. It does not do a deep compare on arrays.
var purple = [{"purple": "drank"}];
var drank = [{"purple": "drank"}];
if(angular.equals(purple, drank)) {
document.write('got dat');
}
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/angularjs/1.4.5/angular.min.js"></script>

If you are using a JSON library, you can encode each object as JSON, then compare the resulting strings for equality.
var obj1={test:"value"};
var obj2={test:"value2"};
alert(JSON.encode(obj1)===JSON.encode(obj2));
NOTE: While this answer will work in many cases, as several people have pointed out in the comments it's problematic for a variety of reasons. In pretty much all cases you'll want to find a more robust solution.

For those of you using Node, there is a convenient method called isDeepStrictEqual on the native util library that can achieve this.
const util = require('util');
const obj1 = {
foo: "bar",
baz: [1, 2]
};
const obj2 = {
foo: "bar",
baz: [1, 2]
};
obj1 == obj2 // false
util.isDeepStrictEqual(obj1, obj2) // true
https://nodejs.org/api/util.html#util_util_isdeepstrictequal_val1_val2

In Node.js, you can use its native require("assert").deepStrictEqual. More info:
http://nodejs.org/api/assert.html
For example:
var assert = require("assert");
assert.deepStrictEqual({a:1, b:2}, {a:1, b:3}); // will throw AssertionError
Another example that returns true / false instead of returning errors:
var assert = require("assert");
function deepEqual(a, b) {
try {
assert.deepEqual(a, b);
} catch (error) {
if (error.name === "AssertionError") {
return false;
}
throw error;
}
return true;
};

Are you trying to test if two objects are the equal? ie: their properties are equal?
If this is the case, you'll probably have noticed this situation:
var a = { foo : "bar" };
var b = { foo : "bar" };
alert (a == b ? "Equal" : "Not equal");
// "Not equal"
you might have to do something like this:
function objectEquals(obj1, obj2) {
for (var i in obj1) {
if (obj1.hasOwnProperty(i)) {
if (!obj2.hasOwnProperty(i)) return false;
if (obj1[i] != obj2[i]) return false;
}
}
for (var i in obj2) {
if (obj2.hasOwnProperty(i)) {
if (!obj1.hasOwnProperty(i)) return false;
if (obj1[i] != obj2[i]) return false;
}
}
return true;
}
Obviously that function could do with quite a bit of optimisation, and the ability to do deep checking (to handle nested objects: var a = { foo : { fu : "bar" } }) but you get the idea.
As FOR pointed out, you might have to adapt this for your own purposes, eg: different classes may have different definitions of "equal". If you're just working with plain objects, the above may suffice, otherwise a custom MyClass.equals() function may be the way to go.

Simplest and logical solutions for comparing everything Like Object, Array, String, Int...
JSON.stringify({a: val1}) === JSON.stringify({a: val2})
Note:
you need to replace val1and val2 with your Object
for the object, you have to sort(by key) recursively for both side objects

If you have a deep copy function handy, you can use the following trick to still use JSON.stringify while matching the order of properties:
function equals(obj1, obj2) {
function _equals(obj1, obj2) {
return JSON.stringify(obj1)
=== JSON.stringify($.extend(true, {}, obj1, obj2));
}
return _equals(obj1, obj2) && _equals(obj2, obj1);
}
Demo: http://jsfiddle.net/CU3vb/3/
Rationale:
Since the properties of obj1 are copied to the clone one by one, their order in the clone will be preserved. And when the properties of obj2 are copied to the clone, since properties already existing in obj1 will simply be overwritten, their orders in the clone will be preserved.

This question has more than 30 answers already. I am going to summarize and explain them (with a "my father" analogy) and add my suggested solution.
You have 4+1 classes of solutions:
1) Use a hacky incomplete quick one-liner
Good if you are in a rush and 99% correctness works.
Examples of this is, JSON.stringify() suggested by Pratik Bhalodiya, or JSON.encode by Joel Anair, or .toString(), or other methods that transform your objects into a String and then compare the two Strings using === character by character.
The drawback, however, is that there is no globally standard unique representation of an Object in String. e.g. { a: 5, b: 8} and {b: 8 and a: 5 } are equal.
Pros: Fast, quick.
Cons: Hopefully works! It will not work if the environment/browser/engine memorizes the ordering for objects (e.g. Chrome/V8) and the order of the keys are different (Thanks to Eksapsy.) So, not guaranteed at all. Performance wouldn't be great either in large objects.
My Father Analogy
When I am talking about my father, "my tall handsome father" and "my handsome tall father" are the same person! But the two strings are not the same.
Note that there is actually a correct (standard way) order of adjectives in English grammar, which says it should be a "handsome tall man," but you are risking your competency if you blindly assume Javascript engine of iOS 8 Safari is also abiding the same grammar, blindly! #WelcomeToJavascriptNonStandards
2) Write your own DIY recursive function
Good if you are learning.
Examples are atmin's solution.
The biggest disadvantage is you will definitely miss some edge cases. Have you considered a self-reference in object values? Have you considered NaN? Have you considered two objects that have the same ownProperties but different prototypical parents?
I would only encourage people to do this if they are practicing and the code is not going to go in production. That's the only case that reinventing the wheel has justifications.
Pros: Learning opportunity.
Cons: Not reliable. Takes time and concerns.
My Father Analogy
It's like assuming if my dad's name is "John Smith" and his birthday is "1/1/1970", then anyone whose name is "John Smith" and is born on "1/1/1970" is my father.
That's usually the case, but what if there are two "John Smith"s born on that day? If you think you will consider their height, then that's increasing the accuracy but still not a perfect comparison.
2.1 You limited scope DIY comparator
Rather than going on a wild chase of checking all the properties recursively, one might consider checking only "a limited" number of properties. For instance, if the objects are Users, you can compare their emailAddress field.
It's still not a perfect one, but the benefits over solution #2 are:
It's predictable, and it's less likely to crash.
You are driving the "definition" of equality, rather than relying on a wild form and shape of the Object and its prototype and nested properties.
3) Use a library version of equal function
Good if you need a production-level quality, and you cannot change the design of the system.
Examples are _.equal of lodash, already in coolaj86's answer or Angular's or Ember's as mentioned in Tony Harvey's answer or Node's by Rafael Xavier.
Pros: It's what everyone else does.
Cons: External dependency, which can cost you extra memory/CPU/Security concerns, even a little bit. Also, can still miss some edge cases (e.g. whether two objects having same ownProperties but different prototypical parents should be considered the same or not.) Finally, you might be unintentionally band-aiding an underlying design problem with this; just saying!
My Father Analogy
It's like paying an agency to find my biological father, based on his phone, name, address, etc.
It's gonna cost more, and it's probably more accurate than myself running the background check, but doesn't cover edge cases like when my father is immigrant/asylum and his birthday is unknown!
4) Use an IDentifier in the Object
Good if you [still] can change the design of the system (objects you are dealing with) and you want your code to last long.
It's not applicable in all cases, and might not be very performant. However, it's a very reliable solution, if you can make it.
The solution is, every object in the system will have a unique identifier along with all the other properties. The uniqueness of the identifier will be guaranteed at the time of generation. And you will use this ID (also known as UUID/GUID -- Globally/Universally Unique Identifier) when it comes to comparing two objects. i.e. They are equal if and only if these IDs are equal.
The IDs can be simple auto_incremental numbers, or a string generated via a library (advised) or a piece of code. All you need to do is make sure it's always unique, which in case of auto_incremental it can be built-in, or in case of UUID, can be checked will all existing values (e.g. MySQL's UNIQUE column attribute) or simply (if coming from a library) be relied upon giving the extremely low likelihood of a collision.
Note that you also need to store the ID with the object at all times (to guarantee its uniqueness), and computing it in real-time might not be the best approach.
Pros: Reliable, efficient, not dirty, modern.
Cons: Needs extra space. Might need a redesign of the system.
My Father Analogy
It's like known my father's Social Security Number is 911-345-9283, so anyone who has this SSN is my father, and anyone who claims to be my father must have this SSN.
Conclusion
I personally prefer solution #4 (ID) over them all for accuracy and reliability. If it's not possible I'd go with #2.1 for predictability, and then #3. If neither is possible, #2 and finally #1.

var object1 = {name: "humza" , gender : "male", age: 23}
var object2 = {name: "humza" , gender : "male", age: 23}
var result = Object.keys(object1).every((key) => object1[key] === object2[key])
Result will be true if object1 has same values on object2.

I use this comparable function to produce copies of my objects that are JSON comparable:
var comparable = o => (typeof o != 'object' || !o)? o :
Object.keys(o).sort().reduce((c, key) => (c[key] = comparable(o[key]), c), {});
// Demo:
var a = { a: 1, c: 4, b: [2, 3], d: { e: '5', f: null } };
var b = { b: [2, 3], c: 4, d: { f: null, e: '5' }, a: 1 };
console.log(JSON.stringify(comparable(a)));
console.log(JSON.stringify(comparable(b)));
console.log(JSON.stringify(comparable(a)) == JSON.stringify(comparable(b)));
<div id="div"></div>
Comes in handy in tests (most test frameworks have an is function). E.g.
is(JSON.stringify(comparable(x)), JSON.stringify(comparable(y)), 'x must match y');
If a difference is caught, strings get logged, making differences spottable:
x must match y
got {"a":1,"b":{"0":2,"1":3},"c":7,"d":{"e":"5","f":null}},
expected {"a":1,"b":{"0":2,"1":3},"c":4,"d":{"e":"5","f":null}}.

Heres's a solution in ES6/ES2015 using a functional-style approach:
const typeOf = x =>
({}).toString
.call(x)
.match(/\[object (\w+)\]/)[1]
function areSimilar(a, b) {
const everyKey = f => Object.keys(a).every(f)
switch(typeOf(a)) {
case 'Array':
return a.length === b.length &&
everyKey(k => areSimilar(a.sort()[k], b.sort()[k]));
case 'Object':
return Object.keys(a).length === Object.keys(b).length &&
everyKey(k => areSimilar(a[k], b[k]));
default:
return a === b;
}
}
demo available here

I don't know if anyone's posted anything similar to this, but here's a function I made to check for object equalities.
function objectsAreEqual(a, b) {
for (var prop in a) {
if (a.hasOwnProperty(prop)) {
if (b.hasOwnProperty(prop)) {
if (typeof a[prop] === 'object') {
if (!objectsAreEqual(a[prop], b[prop])) return false;
} else {
if (a[prop] !== b[prop]) return false;
}
} else {
return false;
}
}
}
return true;
}
Also, it's recursive, so it can also check for deep equality, if that's what you call it.

ES6: The minimum code I could get it done, is this. It do deep comparison recursively by stringifying all key value array sorted representing the object, the only limitation is no methods or symbols are compare.
const compareObjects = (a, b) => {
let s = (o) => Object.entries(o).sort().map(i => {
if(i[1] instanceof Object) i[1] = s(i[1]);
return i
})
return JSON.stringify(s(a)) === JSON.stringify(s(b))
}
console.log(compareObjects({b:4,a:{b:1}}, {a:{b:1},b:4}));
IMPORTANT: This function is doing a JSON.stringfy in an ARRAY with the keys sorted and NOT in the object it self:
["a", ["b", 1]]
["b", 4]

Below is a short implementation which uses JSON.stringify but sorts the keys as #Jor suggested here.
Some tests were taken from the answer of #EbrahimByagowi here.
Of course, by using JSON.stringify, the solution is limited to JSON-serializable types (a string, a number, a JSON object, an array, a boolean, null). Objects like Date, Function, etc. are not supported.
function objectEquals(obj1, obj2) {
const JSONstringifyOrder = obj => {
const keys = {};
JSON.stringify(obj, (key, value) => {
keys[key] = null;
return value;
});
return JSON.stringify(obj, Object.keys(keys).sort());
};
return JSONstringifyOrder(obj1) === JSONstringifyOrder(obj2);
}
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
/// The borrowed tests, run them by clicking "Run code snippet"
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
var printResult = function (x) {
if (x) { document.write('<div style="color: green;">Passed</div>'); }
else { document.write('<div style="color: red;">Failed</div>'); }
};
var assert = { isTrue: function (x) { printResult(x); }, isFalse: function (x) { printResult(!x); } }
assert.isTrue(objectEquals("hi","hi"));
assert.isTrue(objectEquals(5,5));
assert.isFalse(objectEquals(5,10));
assert.isTrue(objectEquals([],[]));
assert.isTrue(objectEquals([1,2],[1,2]));
assert.isFalse(objectEquals([1,2],[2,1]));
assert.isFalse(objectEquals([1,2],[1,2,3]));
assert.isTrue(objectEquals({},{}));
assert.isTrue(objectEquals({a:1,b:2},{a:1,b:2}));
assert.isTrue(objectEquals({a:1,b:2},{b:2,a:1}));
assert.isFalse(objectEquals({a:1,b:2},{a:1,b:3}));
assert.isTrue(objectEquals({1:{name:"mhc",age:28}, 2:{name:"arb",age:26}},{1:{name:"mhc",age:28}, 2:{name:"arb",age:26}}));
assert.isFalse(objectEquals({1:{name:"mhc",age:28}, 2:{name:"arb",age:26}},{1:{name:"mhc",age:28}, 2:{name:"arb",age:27}}));

Just wanted to contribute my version of objects comparison utilizing some es6 features. It doesn't take an order into account. After converting all if/else's to ternary I've came with following:
function areEqual(obj1, obj2) {
return Object.keys(obj1).every(key => {
return obj2.hasOwnProperty(key) ?
typeof obj1[key] === 'object' ?
areEqual(obj1[key], obj2[key]) :
obj1[key] === obj2[key] :
false;
}
)
}

you can use _.isEqual(obj1, obj2) from the underscore.js library.
Here is an example:
var stooge = {name: 'moe', luckyNumbers: [13, 27, 34]};
var clone = {name: 'moe', luckyNumbers: [13, 27, 34]};
stooge == clone;
=> false
_.isEqual(stooge, clone);
=> true
See the official documentation from here: http://underscorejs.org/#isEqual

Assuming that the order of the properties in the object is not changed.
JSON.stringify() works for deep and non-deep both types of objects, not very sure of performance aspects:
var object1 = {
key: "value"
};
var object2 = {
key: "value"
};
var object3 = {
key: "no value"
};
console.log('object1 and object2 are equal: ', JSON.stringify(object1) === JSON.stringify(object2));
console.log('object2 and object3 are equal: ', JSON.stringify(object2) === JSON.stringify(object3));

let std1 = {
name: "Abhijeet",
roll: 1
}
let std2 = {
name: "Siddharth",
roll: 2
}
console.log(JSON.stringify(std1) === JSON.stringify(std2))

One easy way I have found to compare the values of two javascript objects while ignoring property order is with the JSON stringify replacer function:
const compareReplacer = (key, value) => {
if(typeof value === 'object' && !(value instanceof Array))
return Object.entries(value).sort();
return value;
}
export const compareObjects = (a, b) => JSON.stringify(a, compareReplacer) === JSON.stringify(b, compareReplacer);
This will order the properties at every step of the way so that the string result will be invariant to property order. Some one has probably done this before but I just thought I would share it incase not :).

EDIT: This method is quite flawed, and is rife with its own issues. I don't recommend it, and would appreciate some down-votes! It is problematic because 1) Some things can not be compared (i.e. functions) because they can not be serialized, 2) It isn't a very fast method of comparing, 3) It has ordering issues, 4) It can have collision issues/false positives if not properly implemented, 5) It can't check for "exactness" (===), and instead is based of value equality, which is oftentimes not what is desired in a comparison method.
A simple solution to this issue that many people don't realize is to sort the JSON strings (per character). This is also usually faster than the other solutions mentioned here:
function areEqual(obj1, obj2) {
var a = JSON.stringify(obj1), b = JSON.stringify(obj2);
if (!a) a = '';
if (!b) b = '';
return (a.split('').sort().join('') == b.split('').sort().join(''));
}
Another useful thing about this method is you can filter comparisons by passing a "replacer" function to the JSON.stringify functions (https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/JSON/stringify#Example_of_using_replacer_parameter). The following will only compare all objects keys that are named "derp":
function areEqual(obj1, obj2, filter) {
var a = JSON.stringify(obj1, filter), b = JSON.stringify(obj2, filter);
if (!a) a = '';
if (!b) b = '';
return (a.split('').sort().join('') == b.split('').sort().join(''));
}
var equal = areEqual(obj1, obj2, function(key, value) {
return (key === 'derp') ? value : undefined;
});

Needing a more generic object comparison function than had been posted, I cooked up the following. Critique appreciated...
Object.prototype.equals = function(iObj) {
if (this.constructor !== iObj.constructor)
return false;
var aMemberCount = 0;
for (var a in this) {
if (!this.hasOwnProperty(a))
continue;
if (typeof this[a] === 'object' && typeof iObj[a] === 'object' ? !this[a].equals(iObj[a]) : this[a] !== iObj[a])
return false;
++aMemberCount;
}
for (var a in iObj)
if (iObj.hasOwnProperty(a))
--aMemberCount;
return aMemberCount ? false : true;
}

If you are comparing JSON objects you can use https://github.com/mirek/node-rus-diff
npm install rus-diff
Usage:
a = {foo:{bar:1}}
b = {foo:{bar:1}}
c = {foo:{bar:2}}
var rusDiff = require('rus-diff').rusDiff
console.log(rusDiff(a, b)) // -> false, meaning a and b are equal
console.log(rusDiff(a, c)) // -> { '$set': { 'foo.bar': 2 } }
If two objects are different, a MongoDB compatible {$rename:{...}, $unset:{...}, $set:{...}} like object is returned.

I faced the same problem and deccided to write my own solution. But because I want to also compare Arrays with Objects and vice-versa, I crafted a generic solution. I decided to add the functions to the prototype, but one can easily rewrite them to standalone functions. Here is the code:
Array.prototype.equals = Object.prototype.equals = function(b) {
var ar = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(b));
var err = false;
for(var key in this) {
if(this.hasOwnProperty(key)) {
var found = ar.find(this[key]);
if(found > -1) {
if(Object.prototype.toString.call(ar) === "[object Object]") {
delete ar[Object.keys(ar)[found]];
}
else {
ar.splice(found, 1);
}
}
else {
err = true;
break;
}
}
};
if(Object.keys(ar).length > 0 || err) {
return false;
}
return true;
}
Array.prototype.find = Object.prototype.find = function(v) {
var f = -1;
for(var i in this) {
if(this.hasOwnProperty(i)) {
if(Object.prototype.toString.call(this[i]) === "[object Array]" || Object.prototype.toString.call(this[i]) === "[object Object]") {
if(this[i].equals(v)) {
f = (typeof(i) == "number") ? i : Object.keys(this).indexOf(i);
}
}
else if(this[i] === v) {
f = (typeof(i) == "number") ? i : Object.keys(this).indexOf(i);
}
}
}
return f;
}
This Algorithm is split into two parts; The equals function itself and a function to find the numeric index of a property in an array / object. The find function is only needed because indexof only finds numbers and strings and no objects .
One can call it like this:
({a: 1, b: "h"}).equals({a: 1, b: "h"});
The function either returns true or false, in this case true.
The algorithm als allows comparison between very complex objects:
({a: 1, b: "hello", c: ["w", "o", "r", "l", "d", {answer1: "should be", answer2: true}]}).equals({b: "hello", a: 1, c: ["w", "d", "o", "r", {answer1: "should be", answer2: true}, "l"]})
The upper example will return true, even tho the properties have a different ordering. One small detail to look out for: This code also checks for the same type of two variables, so "3" is not the same as 3.

stringify both objects and compare
return (JSON.stringify(obj1) === JSON.stringify(obj2))
This will return true or false

I'd advise against hashing or serialization (as the JSON solution suggest). If you need to test if two objects are equal, then you need to define what equals means. It could be that all data members in both objects match, or it could be that must the memory locations match (meaning both variables reference the same object in memory), or may be that only one data member in each object must match.
Recently I developed an object whose constructor creates a new id (starting from 1 and incrementing by 1) each time an instance is created. This object has an isEqual function that compares that id value with the id value of another object and returns true if they match.
In that case I defined "equal" as meaning the the id values match. Given that each instance has a unique id this could be used to enforce the idea that matching objects also occupy the same memory location. Although that is not necessary.

My == isn't working [duplicate]

This question already has answers here:
How to compare arrays in JavaScript?
(55 answers)
Closed 6 years ago.
var a = [1, 2, 3];
var b = [3, 2, 1];
var c = new Array(1, 2, 3);
alert(a == b + "|" + b == c);
demo
How can I check these array for equality and get a method which returns true if they are equal?
Does jQuery offer any method for this?

This is what you should do. Please do not use stringify nor < >.
function arraysEqual(a, b) {
if (a === b) return true;
if (a == null || b == null) return false;
if (a.length !== b.length) return false;
// If you don't care about the order of the elements inside
// the array, you should sort both arrays here.
// Please note that calling sort on an array will modify that array.
// you might want to clone your array first.
for (var i = 0; i < a.length; ++i) {
if (a[i] !== b[i]) return false;
}
return true;
}

[2021 changelog: bugfix for option4: no total ordering on js objects (even excluding NaN!=NaN and '5'==5 ('5'===5, '2'<3, etc.)), so cannot use .sort(cmpFunc) on Map.keys() (though you can on Object.keys(obj), since even 'numerical' keys are strings).]
Option 1
Easiest option, works in almost all cases, except that null!==undefined but they both are converted to JSON representation null and considered equal:
function arraysEqual(a1,a2) {
/* WARNING: arrays must not contain {objects} or behavior may be undefined */
return JSON.stringify(a1)==JSON.stringify(a2);
}
(This might not work if your array contains objects. Whether this still works with objects depends on whether the JSON implementation sorts keys. For example, the JSON of {1:2,3:4} may or may not be equal to {3:4,1:2}; this depends on the implementation, and the spec makes no guarantee whatsoever. [2017 update: Actually the ES6 specification now guarantees object keys will be iterated in order of 1) integer properties, 2) properties in the order they were defined, then 3) symbol properties in the order they were defined. Thus IF the JSON.stringify implementation follows this, equal objects (in the === sense but NOT NECESSARILY in the == sense) will stringify to equal values. More research needed. So I guess you could make an evil clone of an object with properties in the reverse order, but I cannot imagine it ever happening by accident...] At least on Chrome, the JSON.stringify function tends to return keys in the order they were defined (at least that I've noticed), but this behavior is very much subject to change at any point and should not be relied upon. If you choose not to use objects in your lists, this should work fine. If you do have objects in your list that all have a unique id, you can do a1.map(function(x)}{return {id:x.uniqueId}}). If you have arbitrary objects in your list, you can read on for option #2.)
This works for nested arrays as well.
It is, however, slightly inefficient because of the overhead of creating these strings and garbage-collecting them.
Option 2
Historical, version 1 solution:
// generally useful functions
function type(x) { // does not work in general, but works on JSONable objects we care about... modify as you see fit
// e.g. type(/asdf/g) --> "[object RegExp]"
return Object.prototype.toString.call(x);
}
function zip(arrays) {
// e.g. zip([[1,2,3],[4,5,6]]) --> [[1,4],[2,5],[3,6]]
return arrays[0].map(function(_,i){
return arrays.map(function(array){return array[i]})
});
}
// helper functions
function allCompareEqual(array) {
// e.g. allCompareEqual([2,2,2,2]) --> true
// does not work with nested arrays or objects
return array.every(function(x){return x==array[0]});
}
function isArray(x){ return type(x)==type([]) }
function getLength(x){ return x.length }
function allTrue(array){ return array.reduce(function(a,b){return a&&b},true) }
// e.g. allTrue([true,true,true,true]) --> true
// or just array.every(function(x){return x});
function allDeepEqual(things) {
// works with nested arrays
if( things.every(isArray) )
return allCompareEqual(things.map(getLength)) // all arrays of same length
&& allTrue(zip(things).map(allDeepEqual)); // elements recursively equal
//else if( this.every(isObject) )
// return {all have exactly same keys, and for
// each key k, allDeepEqual([o1[k],o2[k],...])}
// e.g. ... && allTrue(objectZip(objects).map(allDeepEqual))
//else if( ... )
// extend some more
else
return allCompareEqual(things);
}
// Demo:
allDeepEqual([ [], [], [] ])
true
allDeepEqual([ [1], [1], [1] ])
true
allDeepEqual([ [1,2], [1,2] ])
true
allDeepEqual([ [[1,2],[3]], [[1,2],[3]] ])
true
allDeepEqual([ [1,2,3], [1,2,3,4] ])
false
allDeepEqual([ [[1,2],[3]], [[1,2],[],3] ])
false
allDeepEqual([ [[1,2],[3]], [[1],[2,3]] ])
false
allDeepEqual([ [[1,2],3], [1,[2,3]] ])
false
<!--
More "proper" option, which you can override to deal with special cases (like regular objects and null/undefined and custom objects, if you so desire):
To use this like a regular function, do:
function allDeepEqual2() {
return allDeepEqual([].slice.call(arguments));
}
Demo:
allDeepEqual2([[1,2],3], [[1,2],3])
true
-->
Option 3
function arraysEqual(a,b) {
/*
Array-aware equality checker:
Returns whether arguments a and b are == to each other;
however if they are equal-lengthed arrays, returns whether their
elements are pairwise == to each other recursively under this
definition.
*/
if (a instanceof Array && b instanceof Array) {
if (a.length!=b.length) // assert same length
return false;
for(var i=0; i<a.length; i++) // assert each element equal
if (!arraysEqual(a[i],b[i]))
return false;
return true;
} else {
return a==b; // if not both arrays, should be the same
}
}
//Examples:
arraysEqual([[1,2],3], [[1,2],3])
true
arraysEqual([1,2,3], [1,2,3,4])
false
arraysEqual([[1,2],[3]], [[1,2],[],3])
false
arraysEqual([[1,2],[3]], [[1],[2,3]])
false
arraysEqual([[1,2],3], undefined)
false
arraysEqual(undefined, undefined)
true
arraysEqual(1, 2)
false
arraysEqual(null, null)
true
arraysEqual(1, 1)
true
arraysEqual([], 1)
false
arraysEqual([], undefined)
false
arraysEqual([], [])
true
/*
If you wanted to apply this to JSON-like data structures with js Objects, you could do so. Fortunately we're guaranteed that all objects keys are unique, so iterate over the objects OwnProperties and sort them by key, then assert that both the sorted key-array is equal and the value-array are equal, and just recurse. We CANNOT extend the sort-then-compare method with Maps as well; even though Map keys are unique, there is no total ordering in ecmascript, so you can't sort them... but you CAN query them individually (see the next section Option 4). (Also if we extend this to Sets, we run into the tree isomorphism problem http://logic.pdmi.ras.ru/~smal/files/smal_jass08_slides.pdf - fortunately it's not as hard as general graph isomorphism; there is in fact an O(#vertices) algorithm to solve it, but it can get very complicated to do it efficiently. The pathological case is if you have a set made up of lots of seemingly-indistinguishable objects, but upon further inspection some of those objects may differ as you delve deeper into them. You can also work around this by using hashing to reject almost all cases.)
*/
<!--
**edit**: It's 2016 and my previous overcomplicated answer was bugging me. This recursive, imperative "recursive programming 101" implementation keeps the code really simple, and furthermore fails at the earliest possible point (giving us efficiency). It also doesn't generate superfluous ephemeral datastructures (not that there's anything wrong with functional programming in general, but just keeping it clean here).
If we wanted to apply this to a non-empty arrays of arrays, we could do seriesOfArrays.reduce(arraysEqual).
This is its own function, as opposed to using Object.defineProperties to attach to Array.prototype, since that would fail with a key error if we passed in an undefined value (that is however a fine design decision if you want to do so).
This only answers OPs original question.
-->
Option 4:
(continuation of 2016 edit)
This should work with most objects:
const STRICT_EQUALITY_BROKEN = (a,b)=> a===b;
const STRICT_EQUALITY_NO_NAN = (a,b)=> {
if (typeof a=='number' && typeof b=='number' && ''+a=='NaN' && ''+b=='NaN')
// isNaN does not do what you think; see +/-Infinity
return true;
else
return a===b;
};
function deepEquals(a,b, areEqual=STRICT_EQUALITY_NO_NAN, setElementsAreEqual=STRICT_EQUALITY_NO_NAN) {
/* compares objects hierarchically using the provided
notion of equality (defaulting to ===);
supports Arrays, Objects, Maps, ArrayBuffers */
if (a instanceof Array && b instanceof Array)
return arraysEqual(a,b, areEqual);
if (Object.getPrototypeOf(a)===Object.prototype && Object.getPrototypeOf(b)===Object.prototype)
return objectsEqual(a,b, areEqual);
if (a instanceof Map && b instanceof Map)
return mapsEqual(a,b, areEqual);
if (a instanceof Set && b instanceof Set) {
if (setElementsAreEqual===STRICT_EQUALITY_NO_NAN)
return setsEqual(a,b);
else
throw "Error: set equality by hashing not implemented because cannot guarantee custom notion of equality is transitive without programmer intervention."
}
if ((a instanceof ArrayBuffer || ArrayBuffer.isView(a)) && (b instanceof ArrayBuffer || ArrayBuffer.isView(b)))
return typedArraysEqual(a,b);
return areEqual(a,b); // see note[1] -- IMPORTANT
}
function arraysEqual(a,b, areEqual) {
if (a.length!=b.length)
return false;
for(var i=0; i<a.length; i++)
if (!deepEquals(a[i],b[i], areEqual))
return false;
return true;
}
function objectsEqual(a,b, areEqual) {
var aKeys = Object.getOwnPropertyNames(a);
var bKeys = Object.getOwnPropertyNames(b);
if (aKeys.length!=bKeys.length)
return false;
aKeys.sort();
bKeys.sort();
for(var i=0; i<aKeys.length; i++)
if (!areEqual(aKeys[i],bKeys[i])) // keys must be strings
return false;
return deepEquals(aKeys.map(k=>a[k]), aKeys.map(k=>b[k]), areEqual);
}
function mapsEqual(a,b, areEqual) { // assumes Map's keys use the '===' notion of equality, which is also the assumption of .has and .get methods in the spec; however, Map's values use our notion of the areEqual parameter
if (a.size!=b.size)
return false;
return [...a.keys()].every(k=>
b.has(k) && deepEquals(a.get(k), b.get(k), areEqual)
);
}
function setsEqual(a,b) {
// see discussion in below rest of StackOverflow answer
return a.size==b.size && [...a.keys()].every(k=>
b.has(k)
);
}
function typedArraysEqual(a,b) {
// we use the obvious notion of equality for binary data
a = new Uint8Array(a);
b = new Uint8Array(b);
if (a.length != b.length)
return false;
for(var i=0; i<a.length; i++)
if (a[i]!=b[i])
return false;
return true;
}
Demo (not extensively tested):
var nineTen = new Float32Array(2);
nineTen[0]=9; nineTen[1]=10;
> deepEquals(
[[1,[2,3]], 4, {a:5,'111':6}, new Map([['c',7],['d',8]]), nineTen],
[[1,[2,3]], 4, {111:6,a:5}, new Map([['d',8],['c',7]]), nineTen]
)
true
> deepEquals(
[[1,[2,3]], 4, {a:'5','111':6}, new Map([['c',7],['d',8]]), nineTen],
[[1,[2,3]], 4, {111:6,a:5}, new Map([['d',8],['c',7]]), nineTen],
(a,b)=>a==b
)
true
Note that if one is using the == notion of equality, then know that falsey values and coercion means that == equality is NOT TRANSITIVE. For example ''==0 and 0=='0' but ''!='0'. This is relevant for Sets: I do not think one can override the notion of Set equality in a meaningful way. If one is using the built-in notion of Set equality (that is, ===), then the above should work. However if one uses a non-transitive notion of equality like ==, you open a can of worms: Even if you forced the user to define a hash function on the domain (hash(a)!=hash(b) implies a!=b) I'm not sure that would help... Certainly one could do the O(N^2) performance thing and remove pairs of == items one by one like a bubble sort, and then do a second O(N^2) pass to confirm things in equivalence classes are actually == to each other, and also != to everything not thus paired, but you'd STILL have to throw a runtime error if you have some coercion going on... You'd also maybe get weird (but potentially not that weird) edge cases with https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Glossary/Falsy and Truthy values (with the exception that NaN==NaN... but just for Sets!). This is not an issue usually with most Sets of homogenous datatype.
To summarize the complexity of recursive equality on Sets:
Set equality is the tree isomorphism problem http://logic.pdmi.ras.ru/~smal/files/smal_jass08_slides.pdf but a bit simpler
set A =? set B being synonymous with B.has(k) for every k in A implicitly uses ===-equality ([1,2,3]!==[1,2,3]), not recursive equality (deepEquals([1,2,3],[1,2,3]) == true), so two new Set([[1,2,3]]) would not be equal because we don't recurse
trying to get recursive equality to work is kind of meaningless if the recursive notion of equality you use is not 1) reflexive (a=b implies b=a) and 2) symmetric (a=a) and 3) transitive (a=b and b=c implies a=c); this is the definition of an equivalence class
the equality == operator obviously does not obey many of these properties
even the strict equality === operator in ecmascript
does not obey these properties, because the strict equality comparison algorithm of ecmascript has NaN!=NaN; this is why many native datatypes like Set and Map 'equate' NaNs to consider them the same values when they appear as keys
As long as we force and ensure recursive set equality is indeed transitive and reflexive and symmetric, we can make sure nothing horribly wrong happens.
Then, we can do O(N^2) comparisons by recursively comparing everything randomly, which is incredibly inefficient. There is no magical algorithm that lets us do setKeys.sort((a,b)=> /*some comparison function*/) because there is no total ordering in ecmascript (''==0 and 0=='0', but ''!='0'... though I believe you might be able to define one yourself which would certainly be a lofty goal).
We can however .toStringify or JSON.stringify all elements to assist us. We will then sort them, which gives us equivalence classes (two same things won't not have the same string JSON representation) of potentially-false-positives (two different things may have the same string or JSON representation).
However, this introduces its own performance issues because serializing the same thing, then serializing subsets of that thing, over and over, is incredibly inefficient. Imagine a tree of nested Sets; every node would belong to O(depth) different serializations!
Even if that was not an issue, the worst-case performance would still be O(N!) if all the serializations 'hints' were the same
Thus, the above implementation declares that Sets are equal if the items are just plain === (not recursively ===). This will mean that it will return false for new Set([1,2,3]) and new Set([1,2,3]). With a bit of effort, you may rewrite that part of the code if you know what you're doing.
(sidenote: Maps are es6 dictionaries. I can't tell if they have O(1) or O(log(N)) lookup performance, but in any case they are 'ordered' in the sense that they keep track of the order in which key-value pairs were inserted into them. However, the semantic of whether two Maps should be equal if elements were inserted in a different order into them is ambiguous. I give a sample implementation below of a deepEquals that considers two maps equal even if elements were inserted into them in a different order.)
(note [1]: IMPORTANT: NOTION OF EQUALITY: You may want to override the noted line with a custom notion of equality, which you'll also have to change in the other functions anywhere it appears. For example, do you or don't you want NaN==NaN? By default this is not the case. There are even more weird things like 0=='0'. Do you consider two objects to be the same if and only if they are the same object in memory? See https://stackoverflow.com/a/5447170/711085 . You should document the notion of equality you use.) Also note that other answers which naively use .toString and .sort may sometimes fall pray to the fact that 0!=-0 but are considered equal and canonicalizable to 0 for almost all datatypes and JSON serialization; whether -0==0 should also be documented in your notion of equality, as well as most other things in that table like NaN, etc.
You should be able to extend the above to WeakMaps, WeakSets. Not sure if it makes sense to extend to DataViews. Should also be able to extend to RegExps probably, etc.
As you extend it, you realize you do lots of unnecessary comparisons. This is where the type function that I defined way earlier (solution #2) can come in handy; then you can dispatch instantly. Whether that is worth the overhead of (possibly? not sure how it works under the hood) string representing the type is up to you. You can just then rewrite the dispatcher, i.e. the function deepEquals, to be something like:
var dispatchTypeEquals = {
number: function(a,b) {...a==b...},
array: function(a,b) {...deepEquals(x,y)...},
...
}
function deepEquals(a,b) {
var typeA = extractType(a);
var typeB = extractType(a);
return typeA==typeB && dispatchTypeEquals[typeA](a,b);
}

jQuery does not have a method for comparing arrays. However the Underscore library (or the comparable Lodash library) does have such a method: isEqual, and it can handle a variety of other cases (like object literals) as well. To stick to the provided example:
var a=[1,2,3];
var b=[3,2,1];
var c=new Array(1,2,3);
alert(_.isEqual(a, b) + "|" + _.isEqual(b, c));
By the way: Underscore has lots of other methods that jQuery is missing as well, so it's a great complement to jQuery.
EDIT: As has been pointed out in the comments, the above now only works if both arrays have their elements in the same order, ie.:
_.isEqual([1,2,3], [1,2,3]); // true
_.isEqual([1,2,3], [3,2,1]); // false
Fortunately Javascript has a built in method for for solving this exact problem, sort:
_.isEqual([1,2,3].sort(), [3,2,1].sort()); // true

For primitive values like numbers and strings this is an easy solution:
a = [1,2,3]
b = [3,2,1]
a.sort().toString() == b.sort().toString()
The call to sort() will ensure that the order of the elements does not matter. The toString() call will create a string with the values comma separated so both strings can be tested for equality.

With JavaScript version 1.6 it's as easy as this:
Array.prototype.equals = function( array ) {
return this.length == array.length &&
this.every( function(this_i,i) { return this_i == array[i] } )
}
For example, [].equals([]) gives true, while [1,2,3].equals( [1,3,2] ) yields false.

Even if this would seem super simple, sometimes it's really useful. If all you need is to see if two arrays have the same items and they are in the same order, try this:
[1, 2, 3].toString() == [1, 2, 3].toString()
true
[1, 2, 3,].toString() == [1, 2, 3].toString()
true
[1,2,3].toString() == [1, 2, 3].toString()
true
However, this doesn't work for mode advanced cases such as:
[[1,2],[3]].toString() == [[1],[2,3]].toString()
true
It depends what you need.

Based on Tim James answer and Fox32's comment, the following should check for nulls, with the assumption that two nulls are not equal.
function arrays_equal(a,b) { return !!a && !!b && !(a<b || b<a); }
> arrays_equal([1,2,3], [1,3,4])
false
> arrays_equal([1,2,3], [1,2,3])
true
> arrays_equal([1,3,4], [1,2,3])
false
> arrays_equal(null, [1,2,3])
false
> arrays_equal(null, null)
false

jQuery has such method for deep recursive comparison.
A homegrown general purpose strict equality check could look as follows:
function deepEquals(obj1, obj2, parents1, parents2) {
"use strict";
var i;
// compare null and undefined
if (obj1 === undefined || obj2 === undefined ||
obj1 === null || obj2 === null) {
return obj1 === obj2;
}
// compare primitives
if (typeof (obj1) !== 'object' || typeof (obj2) !== 'object') {
return obj1.valueOf() === obj2.valueOf();
}
// if objects are of different types or lengths they can't be equal
if (obj1.constructor !== obj2.constructor || (obj1.length !== undefined && obj1.length !== obj2.length)) {
return false;
}
// iterate the objects
for (i in obj1) {
// build the parents list for object on the left (obj1)
if (parents1 === undefined) parents1 = [];
if (obj1.constructor === Object) parents1.push(obj1);
// build the parents list for object on the right (obj2)
if (parents2 === undefined) parents2 = [];
if (obj2.constructor === Object) parents2.push(obj2);
// walk through object properties
if (obj1.propertyIsEnumerable(i)) {
if (obj2.propertyIsEnumerable(i)) {
// if object at i was met while going down here
// it's a self reference
if ((obj1[i].constructor === Object && parents1.indexOf(obj1[i]) >= 0) || (obj2[i].constructor === Object && parents2.indexOf(obj2[i]) >= 0)) {
if (obj1[i] !== obj2[i]) {
return false;
}
continue;
}
// it's not a self reference so we are here
if (!deepEquals(obj1[i], obj2[i], parents1, parents2)) {
return false;
}
} else {
// obj2[i] does not exist
return false;
}
}
}
return true;
};
Tests:
// message is displayed on failure
// clean console === all tests passed
function assertTrue(cond, msg) {
if (!cond) {
console.log(msg);
}
}
var a = 'sdf',
b = 'sdf';
assertTrue(deepEquals(b, a), 'Strings are equal.');
b = 'dfs';
assertTrue(!deepEquals(b, a), 'Strings are not equal.');
a = 9;
b = 9;
assertTrue(deepEquals(b, a), 'Numbers are equal.');
b = 3;
assertTrue(!deepEquals(b, a), 'Numbers are not equal.');
a = false;
b = false;
assertTrue(deepEquals(b, a), 'Booleans are equal.');
b = true;
assertTrue(!deepEquals(b, a), 'Booleans are not equal.');
a = null;
assertTrue(!deepEquals(b, a), 'Boolean is not equal to null.');
a = function () {
return true;
};
assertTrue(deepEquals(
[
[1, 1, 1],
[2, 'asdf', [1, a]],
[3, {
'a': 1.0
},
true]
],
[
[1, 1, 1],
[2, 'asdf', [1, a]],
[3, {
'a': 1.0
},
true]
]), 'Arrays are equal.');
assertTrue(!deepEquals(
[
[1, 1, 1],
[2, 'asdf', [1, a]],
[3, {
'a': 1.0
},
true]
],
[
[1, 1, 1],
[2, 'asdf', [1, a]],
[3, {
'a': '1'
},
true]
]), 'Arrays are not equal.');
a = {
prop: 'val'
};
a.self = a;
b = {
prop: 'val'
};
b.self = a;
assertTrue(deepEquals(b, a), 'Immediate self referencing objects are equal.');
a.prop = 'shmal';
assertTrue(!deepEquals(b, a), 'Immediate self referencing objects are not equal.');
a = {
prop: 'val',
inside: {}
};
a.inside.self = a;
b = {
prop: 'val',
inside: {}
};
b.inside.self = a;
assertTrue(deepEquals(b, a), 'Deep self referencing objects are equal.');
b.inside.self = b;
assertTrue(!deepEquals(b, a), 'Deep self referencing objects are not equeal. Not the same instance.');
b.inside.self = {foo: 'bar'};
assertTrue(!deepEquals(b, a), 'Deep self referencing objects are not equal. Completely different object.');
a = {};
b = {};
a.self = a;
b.self = {};
assertTrue(!deepEquals(b, a), 'Empty object and self reference of an empty object.');

If you are using lodash and don't want to modify either array, you can use the function _.xor(). It compares the two arrays as sets and returns the set that contains their difference. If the length of this difference is zero, the two arrays are essentially equal:
var a = [1, 2, 3];
var b = [3, 2, 1];
var c = new Array(1, 2, 3);
_.xor(a, b).length === 0
true
_.xor(b, c).length === 0
true

Check every each value by a for loop once you checked the size of the array.
function equalArray(a, b) {
if (a.length === b.length) {
for (var i = 0; i < a.length; i++) {
if (a[i] !== b[i]) {
return false;
}
}
return true;
} else {
return false;
}
}

Using map() and reduce():
function arraysEqual (a1, a2) {
return a1 === a2 || (
a1 !== null && a2 !== null &&
a1.length === a2.length &&
a1
.map(function (val, idx) { return val === a2[idx]; })
.reduce(function (prev, cur) { return prev && cur; }, true)
);
}

If you wish to check arrays of objects for equality and order does NOT matter, i.e.
areEqual([{id: "0"}, {id: "1"}], [{id: "1"}, {id: "0"}]) // true
you'll want to sort the arrays first. lodash has all the tools you'll need, by combining sortBy and isEqual:
// arr1 & arr2: Arrays of objects
// sortProperty: the property of the object with which you want to sort
// Note: ensure every object in both arrays has your chosen sortProperty
// For example, arr1 = [{id: "v-test_id0"}, {id: "v-test_id1"}]
// and arr2 = [{id: "v-test_id1"}, {id: "v-test_id0"}]
// sortProperty should be 'id'
function areEqual (arr1, arr2, sortProperty) {
return _.areEqual(_.sortBy(arr1, sortProperty), _.sortBy(arr2, sortProperty))
}
EDIT: Since sortBy returns a new array, there is no need to clone your arrays before sorting. The original arrays will not be mutated.
Note that for lodash's isEqual, order does matter. The above example will return false if sortBy is not applied to each array first.

This method sucks, but I've left it here for reference so others avoid this path:
Using Option 1 from #ninjagecko worked best for me:
Array.prototype.equals = function(array) {
return array instanceof Array && JSON.stringify(this) === JSON.stringify(array) ;
}
a = [1, [2, 3]]
a.equals([[1, 2], 3]) // false
a.equals([1, [2, 3]]) // true
It will also handle the null and undefined case, since we're adding this to the prototype of array and checking that the other argument is also an array.

There is no easy way to do this. I needed this as well, but wanted a function that can take any two variables and test for equality. That includes non-object values, objects, arrays and any level of nesting.
In your question, you mention wanting to ignore the order of the values in an array. My solution doesn't inherently do that, but you can achieve it by sorting the arrays before comparing for equality
I also wanted the option of casting non-objects to strings so that [1,2]===["1",2]
Since my project uses UnderscoreJs, I decided to make it a mixin rather than a standalone function.
You can test it out on http://jsfiddle.net/nemesarial/T44W4/
Here is my mxin:
_.mixin({
/**
Tests for the equality of two variables
valA: first variable
valB: second variable
stringifyStatics: cast non-objects to string so that "1"===1
**/
equal:function(valA,valB,stringifyStatics){
stringifyStatics=!!stringifyStatics;
//check for same type
if(typeof(valA)!==typeof(valB)){
if((_.isObject(valA) || _.isObject(valB))){
return false;
}
}
//test non-objects for equality
if(!_.isObject(valA)){
if(stringifyStatics){
var valAs=''+valA;
var valBs=''+valB;
ret=(''+valA)===(''+valB);
}else{
ret=valA===valB;
}
return ret;
}
//test for length
if(_.size(valA)!=_.size(valB)){
return false;
}
//test for arrays first
var isArr=_.isArray(valA);
//test whether both are array or both object
if(isArr!==_.isArray(valB)){
return false;
}
var ret=true;
if(isArr){
//do test for arrays
_.each(valA,function(val,idx,lst){
if(!ret){return;}
ret=ret && _.equal(val,valB[idx],stringifyStatics);
});
}else{
//do test for objects
_.each(valA,function(val,idx,lst){
if(!ret){return;}
//test for object member exists
if(!_.has(valB,idx)){
ret=false;
return;
}
// test for member equality
ret=ret && _.equal(val,valB[idx],stringifyStatics);
});
}
return ret;
}
});
This is how you use it:
_.equal([1,2,3],[1,2,"3"],true)
To demonstrate nesting, you can do this:
_.equal(
['a',{b:'b',c:[{'someId':1},2]},[1,2,3]],
['a',{b:'b',c:[{'someId':"1"},2]},["1",'2',3]]
,true);

It handle all possible stuff and even reference itself in structure of object. You can see the example at the end of code.
var deepCompare = (function() {
function internalDeepCompare (obj1, obj2, objects) {
var i, objPair;
if (obj1 === obj2) {
return true;
}
i = objects.length;
while (i--) {
objPair = objects[i];
if ( (objPair.obj1 === obj1 && objPair.obj2 === obj2) ||
(objPair.obj1 === obj2 && objPair.obj2 === obj1) ) {
return true;
}
}
objects.push({obj1: obj1, obj2: obj2});
if (obj1 instanceof Array) {
if (!(obj2 instanceof Array)) {
return false;
}
i = obj1.length;
if (i !== obj2.length) {
return false;
}
while (i--) {
if (!internalDeepCompare(obj1[i], obj2[i], objects)) {
return false;
}
}
}
else {
switch (typeof obj1) {
case "object":
// deal with null
if (!(obj2 && obj1.constructor === obj2.constructor)) {
return false;
}
if (obj1 instanceof RegExp) {
if (!(obj2 instanceof RegExp && obj1.source === obj2.source)) {
return false;
}
}
else if (obj1 instanceof Date) {
if (!(obj2 instanceof Date && obj1.getTime() === obj2.getTime())) {
return false;
}
}
else {
for (i in obj1) {
if (obj1.hasOwnProperty(i)) {
if (!(obj2.hasOwnProperty(i) && internalDeepCompare(obj1[i], obj2[i], objects))) {
return false;
}
}
}
}
break;
case "function":
if (!(typeof obj2 === "function" && obj1+"" === obj2+"")) {
return false;
}
break;
default: //deal with NaN
if (obj1 !== obj2 && obj1 === obj1 && obj2 === obj2) {
return false;
}
}
}
return true;
}
return function (obj1, obj2) {
return internalDeepCompare(obj1, obj2, []);
};
}());
/*
var a = [a, undefined, new Date(10), /.+/, {a:2}, function(){}, Infinity, -Infinity, NaN, 0, -0, 1, [4,5], "1", "-1", "a", null],
b = [b, undefined, new Date(10), /.+/, {a:2}, function(){}, Infinity, -Infinity, NaN, 0, -0, 1, [4,5], "1", "-1", "a", null];
deepCompare(a, b);
*/

var a= [1, 2, 3, '3'];
var b = [1, 2, 3];
var c = a.filter(function (i) { return ! ~b.indexOf(i); });
alert(c.length);