Heres an image of the issue I'm trying to resolve. I am working on my portfolio site; and I have images of some of my personal projects, all of them are the same width but some have different heights. Due to getting full page screenshots of my work, some of the images have a much greater height than others. Instead of allowing displaying all the images the same size and allowing scrolling in the modal window, it scales the images down to fit within the same height as all the others. This gives it an odd look cause some of the images get scaled down a lot. I would like to get all the images to display in the same width, and those that need it to allow scrolling to see the rest of the image. I tried to use overflow: scroll; on the .lightbox but that didn't help. I've also tried overflow-y. I would also like to disable the page in the background from being able to scroll, to allow the scrolling to be focused on the images that it is necessary on.
.lightbox {
position: absolute;
left: 0;
width: 100%;
z-index: 10000;
text-align: center;
line-height: 0;
font-weight: normal;
}
.lightbox .lb-image {
display: block;
min-width: 100%;
height: auto;
border-radius: 3px;
/* Image border */
border: 4px solid white;
}
.lightbox a img {
border: none;
}
.lb-outerContainer {
position: relative;
*zoom: 1;
width: 250px;
min-height: 250px;
margin: 0 auto;
border-radius: 4px;
/* Background color behind image.
This is visible during transitions. */
background-color: white;
}
Lightbox2 by default appends calculated width & height to the image and .lb-outerContainer. But you can override this by doing the following -
.lb-outerContainer {
width: 100% !important;
height: auto !important;
}
.lightbox .lb-image {
width: 100% !important;
height: auto !important;
}
I don't recommend this because this breaks the intended use of this plugin. I'm sure you'll find an alternative to lightbox2 that achieves what you're looking for. So you can consider this as a temporary fix.
EDIT: Here's a jsfiddle to see it work. https://jsfiddle.net/hsugx6wm/43/
Related
Ok, this is an unusual question, but I've been playing around with it for hours and haven't had any progress - hoping the SO community can help! 🤓
Here's the webpage in question: https://pifornerds.io/
We're using this code to dynamically set the background (the digits of pi that you see in grey) height based on the foreground content length:
<script>
// Dynamically set base height based on container contents
var containerHeight = document.getElementById("container").offsetHeight;
var baseHeight = document.getElementById("base").offsetHeight;
if (baseHeight > containerHeight) {
document.getElementById("base").style.height = containerHeight + "px";
}
</script>
CSS snippet:
.layered {
display: grid;
justify-items: left;
background-color: #222222;
max-width: 1000px;
margin: auto;
height: auto;
min-height: 100px;
overflow: hidden;
}
.layered > * {
grid-column-start: 1;
grid-row-start: 1;
}
.base {
font-family: "DejaVuSansMonoBold", courier;
color: white;
opacity: 0.1;
max-width: 100%;
height: 100%;
word-break: break-all;
margin-top: -3px;
margin-left: 10px;
margin-right: 10px;
margin-bottom: 10px;
position: static;
z-index: 1;
overflow: hidden;
}
.container {
display: block;
height: max-content;
overflow: hidden;
}
We wanted to do this so there wouldn't be a bunch of pi digits in the footer area. We think it looks "cleaner" this way.
However, the menu at the top uses anchor links to jump to content lower on the page, for example:
Roadmap
jumps to:
<a id="roadmap"></a>
Now here's the problem ...
After you click a menu anchor link, and then try to scroll back up the page to the top, you can't 🧐 ... because somehow the previous Javascript height update won't allow that.
This is as far up as I can scroll up now, after clicking "Roadmap":
Any ideas? Thanks in advance! 😀
EDIT: Here's a Fiddle: https://jsfiddle.net/imkane/kof83msy/4/
Of course it works properly there 😖
You need to remove the overflow: hidden; from .layered div.
It will probably be better to add overflow: hidden; to .base div, which is the one you set the height on.
My current website is this https://resillience.in
It is completely responsive below 1440px and works fine
But it looks wierd when viewed at 2560px as shown below
Don't want to change the things also in % to make it responsive at 2560px
How to fix the view at 1440px and have a work around like shown below
If viewed at higher, it adds padding from both sides.
Also adding max-width:1440px in the main html css file, I cannot achieve the desired result
The following code also might not solve
#root {
max-width: 1400px;
margin: 0 auto;
}
Because some of the images are having its css property as
position: fixed;
right: 0;
In general,you can apply this CSS to your #root element:
#root {
max-width: 1400px;
margin: 0 auto;
}
This will limit the overall width at 1400px and center it horizontally when the window is wider than 1400px.
I don't know if there are any details in other pages of your website which would cause a problem in conjunction with those settings (I don't see any at first sight), but this would be an easy, general procedure to get what you are asking for.
add justify-content: flex-end; to right side menu and I had changed some CSS to look beautiful. Please go through this.
.jss6 {
justify-content: flex-end;
}
.jss7, .jss18 {
margin: 0 10px; /* to add space between a tag and dropdown */
}
.active {
border: none;
}
.active::before {
position: absolute;
height: 6px;
width: 100%;
background: #3672c0;
content: '';
left: 0;
bottom: -3px;
}
try do the following:
#root {
width: 100%;
}
#media (min-width: 1440px) {
#root {
width: 1440px;
margin: 0 auto; // for centering
}
}
setting the width to fixed-size might solve the issue, from my quick review, why? cuz u probably used width: 100% inside the root div, so setting the root div to fixed-size always be related to that 100% = 1440px; :) let me know
I am using Bootstrap 4 on my project, and modified the modal style in order to make it fullscreen like you can see it on this css code:
.modal.show {
display:flex!important;
flex-direction:column;
justify-content:center;
align-content:center;
align-items: flex-start;
}
.modal-body {
padding: 0;
margin: 0;
}
.close {
color: #aaa;
position: absolute;
/* background: blue !important; */
border: 0;
top: 0;
z-index: 99999;
right: 3%;
float: none;
opacity: 1;
font-size: 40px;
font-weight: 400;
}
.modal-backdrop.modal-backdrop-transparent {
background: #ffffff;
}
.modal-backdrop.modal-backdrop-transparent.in {
opacity: .9;
filter: alpha(opacity=90);
}
.modal-backdrop.modal-backdrop-fullscreen {
background: #ffffff;
}
.modal-backdrop.modal-backdrop-fullscreen.in {
opacity: .97;
filter: alpha(opacity=97);
}
.modal-fullscreen {
background: #fff;
min-width: 100%;
margin: 0;
}
#media (min-width: 768px) {
.modal-fullscreen .modal-dialog {
width: 750px;
}
}
#media (min-width: 992px) {
.modal-fullscreen .modal-dialog {
width: 970px;
}
}
#media (min-width: 1200px) {
.modal-fullscreen .modal-dialog {
width: 100%;
}
}
.modal-dialog {
position:fixed;
padding: 0;
max-width: 100%;
margin: 0;
top: 0;
bottom: 0;
left: 0;
right: 0;
height: 100vh;
overflow:auto;
}
When I tried to scroll down the vertical scrollbar of the browser, it won't ! I can use mouse scroll wheel but not by clicking on it directly !
Are you able to detect the problem ? It's for sure the fixed position but it is needed to make it fullscreen.
Here a jsfiddle to see a live demo of the problem:
https://jsfiddle.net/odbjcpt2/1/
I don't want to use position FLEX instead of FIXED since it won't solve the problem on my project, even if in the example given it will works (modal keep ading padding-right to body ... it is fixed using FIXED).
Thank you
In your JSFiddle, the problem appears to be with the div that contains the Lorem Ipsum text. It has pointer-events: auto; inherited from .modal-content class and if you remove that it ends up with pointer-events: none; inherited from modal-dialog class. If you take both those away, the problem goes away.
EDIT
I believe the root of the issue is that you're setting your .modal-dialog class to have fixed position and overflow auto.
Below is from bootstrap doc
Modals use position: fixed, which can sometimes be a bit particular
about its rendering. Whenever possible, place your modal HTML in a
top-level position to avoid potential interference from other
elements. You’ll likely run into issues when nesting a .modal within
another fixed element.
After playing around, if I edit your CSS in your JSFiddle example and in the .modal-dialog class I just remove position:fixed; and overflow:auto;, the problem goes away.
EDIT AGAIN
I just noticed you actually have .modal-dialog defined in your CSS twice, the first time with flex position and second time with fixed. Sounds like that was maybe a copy/paste mistake. Anyhow, still the same root cause I think, because your .modal-dialog div is fixed and it's inside your .modal div, and bootstrap doc says don't put another fixed inside a .modal
My Goal:
Here is what I'm trying to accomplish. We have an list of categories that appear on a page. The number of categories is unknown. The description can be pretty much any size... yet we want a uniform look. So, we are using the dotdotdot plugin to put ellipses on the paragraphs. When you hover over the item, it should expand the description and show the full text.
I want that hover to float or overlay whatever is below it. Due to some of my layout items (see my NOTE below) my sccontainer element doesn't have a set height. It's dynamic based on the content... with a max-height set.
When I change that height to AUTO in the hover event (which causes the text to flow down and displays all the content), I lose the background on the sccontainer element.
Some pertinent CSS:
.sccontainer { width: 280px; zoom: 1; float: left; margin: 5px 10px; padding: 0; border: 1px solid #8697a1; -moz-border-radius: 5px; border-radius: 5px; -moz-box-shadow: 0 0 6px #777; -webkit-box-shadow: 0 0 6px #777; box-shadow: 0 0 6px #777; -ms-filter: "progid:DXImageTransform.Microsoft.Shadow(Strength=6, Direction=90, Color='#777777')"; filter: progid:DXImageTransform.Microsoft.Shadow(Strength=6, Direction=90, Color='#777777'); position: relative; background: #fff url(http://imagecss.com/images/background.jpg) repeat-x left top; }
.sccontainer .parent { position: absolute; width: 270px; }
.sccontainer .image { margin: 5px; float: left; }
.sccontainer .image img { width: 48px; }
.sccontainer .icon { margin: 0; }
.sccontainer p { margin: 8px; padding: 0; max-height: 145px; }
.sccontainer h1 { line-height: 24px; display: inline-block; vertical-align: middle; width: 200px; height: 48px; padding: 0; margin: 5px 0 0 0; overflow: hidden; }
.sccontainer h1 a { padding: 0; font-size: 24px; color: #fff; font-weight: normal; }
.sccontainer .content { position: relative; height: 210px; padding: 0 5px; font-size: 15px; line-height: 22px; width: 270px; }
.sccontainer a:hover { text-decoration: underline; }
.sccontainer.hover { height: 250px; }
.sccontainer.hover .content { height: auto; }
.sccontainer.hover .content p { min-height: 135px; max-height: none; }
jsFiddle:
Here is a jsFiddle version of what I have right now. You can see this in action, if you hover over the text in the blue box. It's a bit large, so I used jsFiddle instead of putting all the bits here code tags...
http://jsfiddle.net/ztMM5/1/
And here is a mockup of what I'd like to see. Method 5a expands slightly to show the full content.... yets overlaps the red line. None of the other items move around or are affected.
NOTE: Sorry for the size of things. I've trimmed it down about as much as I can. Also, I am modifying an existing intranet website... it's 3rd party, so I have limited control of the source code - hence the table usage. :(
What I've Tried/Researched:
I believe the issue stems from the fact that my sccontainer item is floating, and doesn't have a height specified. That's why the image disappears.
I had a version that kept the background... but the sccontainer box didn't resize like we need... the text just overflowed it... rather ugly.
I don't know enough CSS to make this all work right. I'm not adverse to using jQuery to do more if needed.
I did work on a version that handled most of the hover using the :hover stuff... but it didn't work quite as well as the jQuery approach.
This answer may not solve your specific problem but it may help others with a similar scenario (working with tables makes difficult to render a clean layout in most cases.)
I ran into this issue before and this is how I solved it. It basically relies in an html nested div structure to achieve the expandability of the content without affecting the floating layout of the near elements :
<div id="wrapper" class="cf"><!--wrapper with border and CLEARED-->
<div class="sccontainer"><!--position relative-->
<div class="inner"><!--position absolute-->
<div class="content"><!--position relative-->
<!-- my content here -->
</div>
</div>
</div>
<!-- more containers etc-->
</div><!--END wrapper-->
First, we are going to apply the infamous clear-fix hack to the #wrapper container (use your preferred method):
.cf:after {
visibility:hidden;
display:block;
content:"";
clear:both;
height:0
}
* html .cf {
zoom:1
}
/* IE6 */
*:first-child+html .cf {
zoom:1
}
Then the style for the .sccontainer container :
.sccontainer {
width: 280px; /* or whatever - could be % for responsiveness */
padding-bottom:200px; /* any value to give height without using height ;) */
position: relative;
float: left;
margin: 5px 10px; /* or whatever */
overflow: hidden; /* this is important to keep all same height and big content out of sight */
z-index: 1; /* this is important too, see later */
background: white url("imagebackground.jpg") 0 0 repeat-x; /* need to explain? */
}
Then the .inner container, which actually will help to keep the layout in order if we hover the elements
.inner {
position: absolute; /* please don't move */
width: 100%; /* to fill the whole parent container */
height: 100%; /* same */
}
And the content :
.content {
position: relative;
background: white url("imagebackground.jpg") 0 0 repeat-x; /* not redundant though */
width: 100%; /* helps to fill the gaps with small content */
height: 100%; /* same, specially if using image backgrounds */
/* other styles, etc */
}
NOTE: we should apply same border-radius properties to the three containers and box-shadow to .sccontainer and .content for consistency
Now, what happens when we hover ?
.sccontainer:hover {
overflow: visible; /* show the full content */
z-index: 999; /* place me on top of the others if needed (which lower z-index, remember?) */
}
.sccontainer:hover .content {
height: auto; /* as it really is, including background image */
}
NOTES : this effect will happen regardless if the content's height is smaller than the parent container's height. You may not like the effect mostly if you are using borders and shadows (could be shown as smaller box inside the parent container) so we could add an extra class to .sccontainer like
<div class="sccontainer withhover">
and apply the hover effects only if that class exist like
.sccontainer.withhover:hover {
overflow: visible;
z-index: 999;
}
... and use a bit of jQuery to remove that class for shorter content, so it won't be affected :
jQuery(document).ready(function ($) {
$(".sccontainer").hover(function () {
var $contentHeight = $(this).find(".content").height();
if ($(this).innerHeight() > $contentHeight) {
$(this).removeClass("withhover");
}
});
});
See JSFIDDLE
I'm working on a hobby project of mine -- it's something of a glorified RSS feed reader/grabber. I've been able to get most things working, but for some reason I cannot get the text in a certain span to be drawn above an animated div.
When a feed is grabbed, certain operations are performed before displaying the results. During this time, I keep track of the progress and display them in an animated "progress bar" div. All of the sub-operations each have their own progress bars, and they all work correctly (text on top of bar), but the final progress bar (overall progress) does not layer the text correctly.
I created a simple mock-up in JSFiddle to give an example of my problem.
$('#progress-total-box').bind('click', draw);
function draw() {
if (($('#progress-totalbar-fill').css('width')) == "0px") {
$('#progress-total-box').unbind();
$('#progress-totalbar-fill').animate({width: '100%'}, 2000, function() {
var description = document.createElement('span');
$(description).attr('id', '#progress-total-text');
$(description).html('100%');
$('#progress-totalbar-empty').append(description);
$('#progress-total-box').bind('click', draw);
});
}
else {
$('#progress-total-box').unbind();
$('#progress-totalbar-fill').animate({width: 0}, 2000, function() {
document.getElementById('progress-totalbar-empty').innerHTML = '';
$('#progress-total-box').bind('click', draw);
});
}
}
The style/position/etc is purely for sake of demonstration. In this example, when the grey loading bar div is clicked, it animates its width from 0% to 100% (or vice-versa). When the animation is complete, a new child span is created and appended to the 'empty bar' background div, wherein the total percentage is displayed (100%, in this case).
This span element is intentionally removed when the bar is reset.
Do you guys have any ideas as to what's going wrong, and how I can fix it?
I have encountered this error is present in both Chrome and Firefox.
Thanks in advance!
There are multiple problems here.
First off, you need to remove the # from this line
$(description).attr('id', 'progress-total-text');
The new span, was never getting the css it was supposed.
Second, you need to either change your markup or your css.
In this case, I updated the CSS, but the id name don't make sense anymore
body {
width: 100%;
height: 125px;
margin: 0;
}
#progress-category-box {
position: relative;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
font-size: 0;
background-color: red;
}
#progress-total-box {
position: relative;
width: 100%;
height: 40px;
top: 32.5%;
float: right;
text-align: center;
background-color: #515A5C;
}
#progress-totalbar-empty {
position: relative;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
border: 1px solid #97b0b1;
background-color: transparent;
z-index: 3;
}
#progress-totalbar-fill {
position: relative;
width: 0%;
height: 100%;
top: -42px;
border-left: 1px solid #97b0b1;
border-top: 1px solid #97b0b1;
border-bottom: 1px solid #97b0b1;
background-color: #00FF00;
z-index: 2;
}
#progress-total-text {
position: relative;
color: black;
top: 30%;
font-size: 15px;
z-index: 3;
}
Thing is, you were showing the animated div over the text.
So I put the text over the animation and put a transparent background behind it.
I applied the grey background to the container instead. I also changed it's height and applied height:100% to it's children.
Here's a full fiddle